Loading summary
A
I'm Kiana and I leveled up my business with Shopify. Once I figured out that Shopify was a thing, I never turned back. I can create a site with my eyes closed. Shopify thinks ahead of us, you know, and it thinks about the customer more than anything. Every day I'm thinking about some other new business. But Shopify is doing it to me because it's so easy to use. It's like I can't stop. I'm addicted.
B
Start your free trial@shopify.com we have really big developments this evening in the Epstein files case. The case against Jeffrey Epstein, the case against his co conspirators. A major court ruling was handed down today that could see the release of critical Epstein files and other information that the Department of Justice has been hiding from you. It's the ruling that even I did not think was possible. Katie Fang successfully got the Department of Justice to be forced by court to release critical unredacted documents and and more importantly, a privilege log, a privilege log that I'm going to talk about that has to memorialize exactly what is privileged, exactly what is being withheld from the public and most importantly, why. And it comes tonight as J.D. vance, the Vice President of the United States at the Nixon Library at the Nixon Presidential center is essentially saying, you know what? We're going to commit crimes worse than Watergate and there's nothing you can do to stop us. The COVID up of the Epstein files, well that's worse than Watergate. Make sure to like comment, share and as always subscribe to my substack link below to support my work. Other platforms do not like Epstein reporting so please make sure to boost this here because people need to know the truth. This afternoon a federal judge handed down a stunning ruling in favor of Katie Fang in favor of ruling and releasing more Epstein files. Quote she is suffering the type of harm lack of transparency that Congress sought to prevent by disclosure by requiring disclosure of the information and and the disclosure of the information that Ms. Fang seeks would help her in her work. Here is what Katie Fang has been seeking. Five things. First, to show cause why the redactions of sender and recipient names in the following emails bearing Bates numbers EFTA 00749245, EFTA 0118799 and a few other documents should not be removed in order to show cause why the redactions of potential co conspirator names in the DOJ documents bearing Bates numbers EFTA 01703108 and EFTA 00038227 should not be removed. Show cause why the underlying FBI interview notes that form the basis for the FD302 interviews, the FBI302 interviews with witnesses and interview reports bearing certain Bates numbers should not be produced to protect victims identities. Immediately initiate review and production of foreign language materials that may be subject to production under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. And here is the most important one, immediately publish in the Federal Register the redaction logs required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act Section 2C2 and updated concurrently with a future release of redacted materials once. Why is that the most important thing? Well, a privileged log is essentially a large document, kind of like a spreadsheet that they have to go document by document, Epstein file by Epstein file and identify why certain redactions were made, why certain documents were withheld from the public. They have to describe what the document is. Are they email communications? Who are they from who are they to who are they between? They have to identify what privilege they're seeking. Are they seeking attorney client privilege in that case? Who holds the privilege? In this case? There shouldn't be any attorney client privilege related issues unless someone is asserting that privilege because the DOJ doesn't have an attorney client relationship with any of these individuals, including the President of the United States. Are they seeking executive privilege? Are there communications between Donald Trump and DOJ officials, for example, that they're trying to withhold? What are they trying to withhold? And we're going to find out. And while the court made clear that it wasn't going to grant a stay, the DOJ desperately wanted seven more days to go to appeal in front of the D.C. circuit. The Attorney General also requested a 60 day stay to determine whether future appellate review is warranted. The court says it will not issue a stay for the reason stated in the opinion. The Attorney General has conceded that he is in violation of the act. Ms. Fang is not requesting the immediate production of documents or rather the Attorney General show cause if he declines to do so. As to the request of the foreign language documents, the act required the Attorney General to produce the documents and publish the log by December 19, 2025, more than six months ago. A stay is not warranted. A major major decision. And before I continue, I wanted to share a company that I started working with called Wild Grain. I love them. Watch this. Hey folks, I wanted to share with you a company that I've been working with for a long time. Really enjoy their products. It's called called Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from frozen subscription box for sourdough breads, artisanal pastries and fresh pastas. All items conveniently bake in 25 minutes or less. And I'll tell you this, I use them personally, which is why I'm sharing them with you. With a three month old in tow, baking and cooking truly has never been easier with Wild Grains help and it uses simple ingredients you can pronounce in a slow fermentation process that can be easier on your belly and and richer in nutrients and antioxidants. In addition to their variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box and a new protein box. So I wanted to share them with you and they're sponsoring this post graciously. So do me a favor and try out Wild Grain today and get $30 off your first box along with free croissants for life by visiting wildgrain.com backslash aaron30 and using code AARON30A A R O N30 at checkout. Thanks so much for your support and I hope you enjoy them. Like I said, truly. Test it out Link below. I love Wild Grain now Katie Fang spoke after this monumental victory. Take a listen to what she had to say.
C
I, Katie Fang, private citizen, have standing to be able to get Todd Blanche, as the Acting Attorney General of the Department of Justice to be able to comply with Judge Sullivan's order, which is now telling him that on or before July 2nd he either has to put up or shut up. He either has to bring forth unredacted files or show cause as to why he should not or cannot do so. But I have identified Ben specific areas in the Epstein files. Number one redactions that have been made to senders and recipients names and email addresses for some of the most egregious egregious email communications with Jeffrey Epstein talking about little girls being naughty, things like that. Judge Sullivan says those identities have to be disclosed. Number two, the FBI interview notes for the victim who is alleged that when she was 13 years old she was physically and sexually abused by Donald Trump. Judge Sullivan has said that Todd Blanche must produce those or show cause as to why that he should not have to do so. The four foreign language documents in the Epstein files act that the Department of Justice didn't bother to do interpretations or translations of. Judge Sullivan said you have to produce those the names in two internal DOJ documents that identify the co conspirators, co defendants that were going to be a part of that proposed indictment in the Southern District of Florida that Never materialized because it was never produced or presented to the grand jury. Instead, and Epstein got his sweetheart plea deal with the state authorities. Judge Sullivan says that those identities of those co conspirators and co defendants must be revealed. And lastly, there was the redaction log that the Epstein Files Transparency act required the DOJ to produce contemporaneously with the rollout of these files. It was supposed to identify the grounds underneath this law as to why they were withholding or redacting certain bits of information. The DOJ wiped his ass with it, Ben, and did produce that at all. Judge Sullivan said, you better do it and start it now. If not, there's going to be consequences. I mean, this is a big deal, Ben. This judge says I have informational harm and economic harm. But you know what the best part about this order is? It says that Blanche must produce, quote, to the public, not to just Ms. Fang, but to the public. And this is why I brought this lawsuit. In the beginning, we needed this transparency
B
and we're gonna get it. And tonight JD Vance essentially says, you know what, I'm just gonna say the quiet part out loud and brag about it. Take a listen.
D
So we were talking about this a little bit backstage, but I'm actually fascinated by Nixon as a character in history. I think that his historical legacy is enjoying a bit of a renaissance, but I think deservedly so. As I joked with Robert backstage, if Watergate happened to tomorrow, it would be like a 12 hour news story. The idea that it would have taken down a presidency is crazy. And by the way, if you look at the story of how the deep state took down Richard Nixon, it's not all that different from what the same groups of people, the same institutions tried to do to Donald Trump and the first Trump administration. There is a parallel. I also, just at a personal level, you know, okay, young senator, vice president, writes some best selling books.
B
Here's the thing. The reason why, literally the reason why Vance can say this is because no one's going to do anything about it. The Epstein files cover up is the biggest story, bigger than Watergate. No one's doing anything about it. But we need to keep the pressure on. So like comment, share and subscribe to my substack link below to support. See you soon. Hey folks, thanks so much for watching. Feel free to add this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you watch for the latest breaking news and daily hits throughout the day. Make sure to follow subscribe. See you soon for more.
E
Are you noticing your car insurance rate creep up. Even without tickets or claims, you're not alone. That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance assistant. Jerry handles the legwork by comparing quotes side by side from over 50 top insurers so you can confidently hit buy. No spam calls, no hidden fees. Jerry even tracks rates and alerts you when it's best to shop. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year. Don't settle for higher rates. Download the Jerry app or visit Jerry AI Libsyn today. That's J E R R Y AI libsync.
The Parnas Perspective
Host: Aaron Parnas
Episode: New Development in Epstein Files!!
Date: June 26, 2026
In this explosive episode, Aaron Parnas covers a monumental legal development in the ongoing fight for transparency in the Jeffrey Epstein case. A federal court has handed down a ruling compelling the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release previously withheld, unredacted documents related to Epstein and his alleged co-conspirators. With sharp analysis, Aaron walks listeners through what this means for the case, for justice, and for the culture of political impunity—drawing stark comparisons to the Watergate scandal. The episode features exclusive commentary from journalist Katie Fang, who led the charge in court, and examines the broader political implications, including recent provocative statements from Vice President J.D. Vance.
[00:26 - 06:13]
Notable Quote:
"It’s the ruling that even I did not think was possible. Katie Fang successfully got the Department of Justice to be forced by court to release critical unredacted documents and – more importantly – a privilege log."
—Aaron Parnas [00:34]
[01:48 - 05:40]
Aaron breaks down what journalist and attorney Katie Fang requested in court:
Notable Quote:
"A privileged log is essentially a large document, kind of like a spreadsheet...they have to go document by document...and identify why certain redactions were made, why certain documents were withheld from the public."
—Aaron Parnas [03:41]
[06:13 - 08:53]
Katie Fang joins to explain the meaning of her legal victory, emphasizing that the order applies to the public, not just her personally. She details which documents and redactions must be addressed, underscoring the significance of the disclosure mandate.
Notable Quotes:
"I, Katie Fang, private citizen, have standing to be able to get Todd Blanche, as the Acting Attorney General...to comply with Judge Sullivan's order, which is now telling him that on or before July 2nd he either has to put up or shut up."
—Katie Fang [06:13]
"The four foreign language documents in the Epstein files act that the Department of Justice didn't bother to do interpretations or translations of… Judge Sullivan said you have to produce those." —Katie Fang [07:28]
"But you know what the best part about this order is? It says that Blanche must produce, quote, to the public, not to just Ms. Fang, but to the public. And this is why I brought this lawsuit. In the beginning, we needed this transparency and we're gonna get it." —Katie Fang [08:39]
[08:53 - 09:59]
Notable Quotes:
"The Epstein files cover up is the biggest story, bigger than Watergate. No one's doing anything about it. But we need to keep the pressure on."
—Aaron Parnas [09:59]
"If Watergate happened tomorrow, it would be like a 12 hour news story… The idea that it would have taken down a presidency is crazy." —J.D. Vance [09:08]
This episode of The Parnas Perspective delivers a granular look at a legal bombshell: a court order demanding unprecedented transparency in the Epstein files. Aaron Parnas explains the mechanics and stakes of the ruling, amplifies Katie Fang’s victorious reflections, and urges listeners to stay vigilant as political actors frame and potentially undermine these historic disclosures. The tone is urgent, informed, and combative, reflecting a deep belief in the public’s right to know—regardless of how “untouchable” the implicated individuals may seem.