The Political Scene | The New Yorker
Episode: Evan Osnos and John Cassidy on Michelle Obama’s Trip to China
Date: March 28, 2014
Host: Dorothy Wickenden
Guests: Evan Osnos, John Cassidy
Overview
This episode delves into the diplomatic and political significance of First Lady Michelle Obama’s trip to China, set against the backdrop of President Obama’s concurrent trip to Europe addressing the Ukraine crisis. The discussion explores the nuanced approaches each took, the history and impact of past U.S.-China interactions, the Obama administration's broader foreign policy goals in Asia and Europe, the ongoing Ukraine situation, and the shifting dynamics of U.S. alliances.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Michelle Obama’s Diplomatic Approach in China
- Contrast with Hillary Clinton’s 1995 Beijing Speech: Michelle Obama’s remarks in China were intentionally less confrontational than Hillary Clinton’s famous speech at the 1995 UN Women’s Conference, which directly challenged the Chinese government on human rights.
- [02:09] Clip of Clinton: “It is time for us to say here in Beijing and for the world to hear that it is no longer acceptable to discuss women’s rights as separate from human rights.”
- Anodyne yet Significant Messaging:
- Osnos points out that Clinton’s speech “still looms large” for Chinese officials and that Obama’s team aimed to balance people-to-people diplomacy with subtle advocacy for free expression—without overtly offending their hosts.
- [02:39] Evan Osnos: “They had to come up with a way to try to make some sort of statement without doing so much that it overshadowed the visitor.”
- Osnos points out that Clinton’s speech “still looms large” for Chinese officials and that Obama’s team aimed to balance people-to-people diplomacy with subtle advocacy for free expression—without overtly offending their hosts.
- Chinese Reaction:
- The state media censored Obama’s comments on free expression, which Osnos notes "basically proves the point." Nevertheless, her comments still circulated online and sparked discussion, without becoming a diplomatic incident.
- [03:47] Evan Osnos: “She was able to get that message across with just enough energy...but it didn’t strike them as a guest coming into their house and saying something uncomfortable.”
- The state media censored Obama’s comments on free expression, which Osnos notes "basically proves the point." Nevertheless, her comments still circulated online and sparked discussion, without becoming a diplomatic incident.
2. Education as a Diplomatic Bridge
- Personal Narratives and Minority Experiences:
- Michelle Obama discussed her journey as an African American woman, drawing subtle echoes to issues facing Tibetan and Uyghur minorities in China.
- [04:41] Evan Osnos: "There’s echoes in that of what it means to be a Tibetan or...a Uyghur Muslim minority."
- Michelle Obama discussed her journey as an African American woman, drawing subtle echoes to issues facing Tibetan and Uyghur minorities in China.
- Debunking Cultural Stereotypes:
- Obama’s accounts of American educational rigor helped counter myths about lackadaisical American students versus overachieving Chinese ones.
3. U.S. Foreign Policy: The "Pivot" to Asia and European Reassurances
- Obama’s Strategic Balancing:
- The “pivot” to Asia made sense strategically, but it risked signaling to Europe that it was being deprioritized, especially amidst the Ukraine crisis.
- [05:38] John Cassidy: “It’s okay to say you’re going to pivot to Asia, but I think a lot of people in Europe took that as...America was withdrawing to some extent from Europe.”
- The “pivot” to Asia made sense strategically, but it risked signaling to Europe that it was being deprioritized, especially amidst the Ukraine crisis.
- Obama’s Brussels Speech:
- Cassidy praises Obama's Brussels address for responding point-by-point to Putin’s justifications for Crimea.
- [06:44] John Cassidy: “His speech in Brussels was one of his better speeches. I think he hit all the notes.”
- Cassidy praises Obama's Brussels address for responding point-by-point to Putin’s justifications for Crimea.
- Criticism from Domestic Opponents:
- Obama faces domestic criticism for either “saber-rattling” without action or for avoiding intervention altogether.
- [06:55] Evan Osnos: “He knows that he has very little support among the American public for intervention...support for an activist American foreign policy has dropped to its lowest level since 1964.”
- Obama faces domestic criticism for either “saber-rattling” without action or for avoiding intervention altogether.
4. East Asian Flashpoints and U.S. Alliances
- Japan–South Korea Tensions:
- Obama tried to mediate between key allies locked in historic disputes—a necessary step for maintaining a united counterweight to China in the region.
- [08:18] Evan Osnos: “He faces the role of being a mediator between two allies...to shore up an alliance designed to be a counterweight to China’s growing power in Asia.”
- Obama tried to mediate between key allies locked in historic disputes—a necessary step for maintaining a united counterweight to China in the region.
- Upcoming Presidential Trip to Asia:
- Obama planned to visit Japan, the Philippines, Malaysia, and South Korea—but notably not Beijing, sending a message of commitment to allies.
- [14:12] Evan Osnos: “The United States will stand up and defend and support these [allies] in what appears to be this escalating conflict over territory...”
- [16:08] Evan Osnos: “He's not going to Beijing...designed to send a very clear message, which is the US believes that it has a number of allies in the region and it’s going to back them up.”
- Obama planned to visit Japan, the Philippines, Malaysia, and South Korea—but notably not Beijing, sending a message of commitment to allies.
5. Ukraine Crisis and Sanctions on Russia
- Effectiveness and Goals of Sanctions:
- Initial sanctions were weak, but subsequent ones targeted Putin’s circle more meaningfully, gaining European support—even from Germany.
- [09:41] John Cassidy: “The first list was just 11 people...I think I described it as pitiful...The US stepped up its sanctions to include a lot of the business people around Putin.”
- Europe’s coordination is key, particularly due to economic ties with Russia.
- Initial sanctions were weak, but subsequent ones targeted Putin’s circle more meaningfully, gaining European support—even from Germany.
- U.S. Commitment to NATO Allies:
- Obama reassured NATO members, especially the Baltics, of America’s security guarantees in the face of Russian threats.
- [12:01] Evan Osnos quoting Obama: “What we will do always is uphold our solemn obligation...our Article 5 duty to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of our allies.”
- [12:18] John Cassidy: “He’s effectively saying there if the Russians invade the Baltic states...America would use nuclear weapons against Russia. The question is whether that’s credible.”
- Obama reassured NATO members, especially the Baltics, of America’s security guarantees in the face of Russian threats.
6. China’s View of Ukraine and Russia
- Reluctance to Endorse Russian Actions:
- China is cautious about supporting Putin’s intervention in Ukraine, given its longstanding principle of non-interference and internal vulnerabilities in places like Tibet.
- [12:53] Evan Osnos: “One of China’s core principles of foreign policy is not intervening in the internal affairs of other states...So when it sees Putin venturing in and annexing Crimea, that is a source of enormous concern.”
- China is cautious about supporting Putin’s intervention in Ukraine, given its longstanding principle of non-interference and internal vulnerabilities in places like Tibet.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- [02:39] Evan Osnos: “The legacy of Hillary Clinton’s visit to Beijing still looms large...that was the backdrop that Michelle Obama was confronting when trying to design this trip.”
- [03:47] Evan Osnos: “The leadership’s response was reflected in the fact that the state media did censor the comments that she made about free expression, which, you know, basically proves the point.”
- [06:55] Evan Osnos: “There was a poll done by Pew in December that showed that support for an activist American foreign policy has dropped to its lowest level since 1964.”
- [09:41] John Cassidy: “The first list was just 11 people...that just looked, I think I described it as pitiful in a blog post I wrote.”
- [12:01] Obama, quoted by Osnos: “What we will do always is uphold our solemn obligation—our Article 5 duty to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of our allies. And in that promise, we will never waver. NATO nations never stand alone.”
- [14:12] Evan Osnos: “The president is in the position of going to East Asia to signal that the United States recognizes the threat that’s posed, the possibility of a conflict that would draw in the United States…But at the same time, he’s trying not to signal too much that we’re prepared to join in a fight.”
Important Timestamps
- 01:14 – Start of Episode; Introduction by Dorothy Wickenden
- 01:33–02:14 – Contrast between Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton’s Beijing speeches
- 02:39–04:29 – Analysis of Michelle Obama’s diplomacy and Chinese response
- 04:41–05:22 – Education as a diplomatic focus and personal narratives
- 05:38–06:44 – Obama’s “pivot to Asia” and strategic dilemmas
- 06:55–08:08 – Criticisms of Obama’s foreign policy ambiguity
- 08:18–09:26 – US mediation in Japan–South Korea dispute
- 09:41–12:01 – Sanctions on Russia and European response
- 12:01–12:50 – US/NATO security commitment to Baltic states
- 12:53–14:02 – Chinese perspective on Ukraine crisis
- 14:12–16:08 – Obama’s upcoming Asia trip; regional dynamics
- 16:08 – Not going to Beijing: U.S. signals to regional allies
Tone & Language
The conversation is analytical, nuanced, and sometimes wry, characteristic of The New Yorker’s reporting. Discussion is seasoned with historical context, pragmatic realism about the limitations and challenges of US foreign policy, and a keen eye on the unspoken signals of diplomatic actions.
Summary
This episode offers insightful analysis into the Obama administration’s delicate dance on the world stage: how Michelle Obama leveraged soft diplomacy in China, the balancing of U.S. priorities between Asia and Europe during the Ukraine crisis, the limits and symbolism of Western sanctions on Russia, and the complex web of relationships—both competitive and cooperative—materializing in 21st-century global politics.