← The President's Daily Brief
The President's Daily Brief
March 18th, 2026: Who’s Actually In Charge Of Iran Right Now? & Trump Delays China Trip
00:23:33
Loading summary
Transcript8 lines
- [00:01]
A
FOX News is now streaming live on Fox 1. When news breaks, we don't just report it. We go beyond the headlines to get the full story. Get live coverage in depth, analysis and perspectives from the voices you trust all in one place. Whether you're at home or on the go, stay connected to the stories shaping our world stream. Fox News on Fox 1. Download today. It's Wednesday, the 18th of March. Welcome to the President's Daily Brief. I'm Mike Baker, your eyes and ears on the world stage. All right, let's get briefed. First up, new reports. Well, from the US Side say there's been back channel communication between the US And Iran. The Iranian regime is denying that there are any discussions taking place, but it does raise a bigger question. Even if messages are being exchanged, is there anyone left in Tehran who could actually make a deal? I'll have the details later in the show. President Trump hits pause on a high stakes summit in China, delaying the visit by weeks as the White House shifts its full attention to the war with Iran. Plus, tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan deteriorate even further after a deadly airstrike in Kabul kills dozens. And in today's Back of the Brief, an update on President Trump's efforts to build a Hormuz coalition. As many nations say, thanks, but no thanks. But first, our PDB Spotlight. We'll start today with reports suggesting that the U.S. and Iran may have quietly reopened lines of communication with messages allegedly passed through back channels in recent days as the war continues into its third week. At the same time, Iranian officials are publicly denying that any such talks are taking place. And President Trump, when asked about it, he said Iranian officials are in fact reaching out, but added that the US has no clear idea who those individuals are or whether they actually have the authority to speak on behalf of the regime. And that gets to the real story here because the question is not simply whether messages are being exchanged between Washington and Tehran. The more important question is who inside Iran still has the authority to make those conversations mean anything. Now, according to reporting from Axios, the contact, if it is happening, appears to involve US Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iran's foreign Minister Abbas Araghi. The outreach purportedly came from the Iranian side and was focused on finding a way to end the conflict. If accurate, that would mark the first significant communication between the two sides since the war began. But Arachi has publicly denied it, insisting that his last contact with Witkoff came before the conflict and dismissing the reports as misleading. It's entirely possible that both sides are telling a version of the Truth, quiet back channel communication is not unusual in a conflict like this, and public denials can serve their own strategic purpose. Neither side wants to appear as though it's seeking negotiations from a position of weakness. But even if messages are being exchanged, there's a more fundamental issue at play, one that raises serious questions about whether any of this communication could actually lead to an agreement. And that issue is authority inside the regime. Despite his role as foreign minister, Arachi was never considered one of the regime's primary decision makers. US Officials don't believe he has the power to negotiate or commit Iran to any meaningful deal. At most, he appears to be serving as an intermediary, someone who can pass messages along, but not necessarily someone who can make decisions. So who exactly within the regime would he be speaking for? Prior to recent developments, U.S. officials believed that role was being filled by Ali Laranjani, who had emerged as a central figure inside Iran's leadership structure following the death of the previous supreme leader. Larajani appeared to be acting as a kind of coordinator, bridging the gap between the country's political leadership, its security apparatus, and other centers of power within the regime. In other words, if there was someone capable of negotiating on Iran's behalf, it was likely him. But with reports now indicating that Larajani, by the way, the architect behind the murder of thousands of Iranians during the recent protests, has been killed in an airstrike, well, that structure may no longer exist. And that leaves a significant gap. The current supreme Leader, Mujtab Al Khamenei, has not been seen or heard in public. The only contact he's had with the world has been through several written statements that were attributed to him, but nothing beyond that. Beyond the absentee supreme leader, much of the regime's senior leadership has also been degraded, and it's increasingly unclear how decisions are being made inside Tehran or whether there is a single unified chain of command at all. That kind of fragmentation makes meaningful diplomacy extremely difficult, because negotiations are not just about opening a line of communication. They require someone on the other side who has the authority to make commitments, the ability to enforce those commitments, and the backing of the broader system to ensure sure that any agreement holds. So while there may be messages being passed back and forth, that doesn't necessarily bring the two sides closer to a resolution. If anything, it may reflect uncertainty within the regime itself. Different figures reaching out, exploring options, or attempting to create space without the ability to fully control the outcome. All right, up next, President Trump delays a major trip to China as the White House focuses on Iran while a deadly Pakistani airstrike in Kabul, Afghanistan leaves dozens dead as tensions between the two countries continue to escalate. I'll be right back. Hey, Mike Baker here with an important message about improving your personal finances right now. A lot of folks have had experiences with bad credit at some point in their lives. It's just a fact. If you're in that boat now, I want to tell you about Ava. That's Ava. Ava is an incredible credit building app designed to work fast so your credit score can start climbing with almost zero effort. AVA reports all your on time payments, including rent and utilities up to 24 months back so you can build positive history. In fact, members improve their scores by an average of 30 points in just 30 days. Take control of your credit. Today, download the AVA app again. That's AVA. And when you join using my promo code Baker, you'll get 20 off your first year, monthly or annual, your choice. Again, grab the AVA app and use my promo code Baker, and you'll get 20 off any plan for up to a year. That's promo code Baker. B A K E R. Just like it sounds, thanks to Ava. Now go get yourself good credit. Hey, Mike Baker here. Now, did you know that Fast Growing Trees is America's largest and most trusted online nursery? You know that they've got thousands of trees and plants and over 2 million happy customers. Come on, seriously. 2 million satisfied customers. They have all the plants your yard or home needs, including fruit trees and privacy trees, flowering trees, shrubs. Don't forget your shrubs and houseplants. All grown with care and guaranteed to arrive on your doorstep healthy. Whatever you're looking for, Fast Growing Trees helps you find options that actually work for your climate, for your space, for your lifestyle. Right now they have great deals on spring planting essentials, up to half off on select plants. And listeners to the PDB get 20% off their first purchase when using the code PDB at checkout. That's an additional 20% off for better plants and better growing. And at fast growing trees.com using the code PDB at checkout, that's fast growing trees.com code PDB. Now is the perfect time to plant and use code PDB to save. Today offers valid for a limited time. Terms and conditions may apply. Welcome back to the pdb. The war with Iran is reshaping the President's agenda. President Trump is now delaying his planned summit in China with President Xi Jinping by five to six weeks as he prioritizes staying in Washington. Now, according to the President, this isn't about canceling the trip altogether. It simply comes down to timing. Trump told reporters the visit, which was originally scheduled for 31 March through 2 April, is being pushed back so his administration can recalibrate urgencies while the conflict in the Middle east continues to dominate the headlines. Trump said, quote, we're resetting the meeting, adding that the U.S. is, quote, working with China and that Beijing was, quote, fine with it. He also said, quote, we've requested that we delay it a month or so. Speaking to an event at the Oval Office, the president said he's been in contact with Chinese officials, but when it comes to leaving Washington right now, the answer is no. He said, quote, I'd love to go, but because of the war, I want to be here. I have to be here. End quote. As operations in tandem with Israel against Iran continue, White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said Trump's, quote, utmost responsibility right now as commander in chief is ensuring the continued success of Operation Epic Fury, something she says he hasn't taken his eyes off of. In nearly three weeks, the Trump and Xi summit was expected to focus heavily on trade, coming a year after the tit for tat escalation on tariffs between Washington and Beijing that eventually settled into a fragile truce. Then just last month, you may remember, the Supreme Court struck down many of Trump's tariffs, reshaping the economic landscape yet again and setting the stage for what could have been a high stake round of negotiations with Xi. But the summit has now become more complicated because this isn't solely about trade policies anymore. As we've been tracking, the war with Iran is bleeding into global economic and security concerns, especially in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most vital shipping arteries that heavily services China. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant pushed back this week on a Financial Times report suggesting that Trump's delay in visiting China was tied to the president and pressing Beijing to help police the Strait of Hormuz, saying any change in timing was not driven by that demand. Still, the pressure is there. Trump has called on other countries, including China, to help reopen the critical waterway, arguing global energy markets depend on restoring safe passage. He said last week that American forces have destroyed dozens of Iranian ships capable of laying naval mines, demonstrating the scale of the threat and the ongoing US Response. So where does that leave us? China relations? Despite the delay, Trump has an optimistic tone. He continues to describe the relationship as very good, a signal that, at least publicly, both sides are keeping the door open to cooperation. Still, even before this postponement, expectations for an expansive deal or breakthrough were already tempered. Economic analysts warned that deep financial and trade tensions between the two powers made any major signings during the summit unlikely. Okay, I want to shift to the ongoing conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan. This week saw the deadliest attack thus far take place as a Pakistani airstrike on a drug rehabilitation center in Kabul killed dozens. Now, the strike took place late Monday night in the New York Times reports the death toll at about 75, but officials on the ground with the Red Crescent warn that number could steadily climb. So what do we know about the target of this strike? According to Afghan officials, Pakistan's focus was a Taliban run drug rehabilitation center with roughly 200 people inside. At the time, a UN assessment found that part of the facility was destroyed, including a section housing about 180 adolescents in that area. There are expected to be no survivors as recovery efforts intensify. But Pakistan's account of the strike looks very different. Islamabad acknowledged carrying out the airstrike, which was one of at least six launched across Afghanistan that day, but insists the intended target was an ammunition depot, not a civilian facility. Pakistan's information minister says the operation was carried out with precision intelligence, targeting infrastructure allegedly used by the Taliban government's military wing. So as is typical in the midst of a conflict, we have two competing narratives. Afghanistan says this was a civilian facility, while Pakistan calls it a legitimate security target. Now, I want to point out that this was the third time in recent weeks that Pakistan has hit targets inside Kabul. And that alone tells you how quickly this conflict is intensifying. A Taliban spokesman warned Afghanistan will retaliate. And to better understand how we got here, well, it helps to briefly zoom out as we've been monitoring here on the pdb, the escalation has been building for months, but it also reflects a deeper shift in our relationship that not long ago looked very different. For one, Pakistan was once one of the Taliban's primary backers. But that relationship fractured as cross border violence has surged. Islamabad now accuses Afghanistan's Taliban leadership of harboring terror groups responsible for hundreds of attacks inside Pakistan, particularly along their shared 1,600mile border where armed groups operate on both sides. And until recently, there were still attempts to manage those tensions. Back in October, officials from both countries were meeting regularly after a series of clashes along the border. Those talks collapsed and that's what set the stage for what we're seeing now. Regular listeners of the President's Daily Brief remember that last month our coverage of this conflict centered on Pakistan formally declaring what it described as, quote, open war against the Taliban government. Since then, Pakistani armed forces have carried out dozens of airstrikes targeting Afghanistan's largest cities, military positions, and broader regions. It's a campaign that has hit Taliban infrastructure but increasingly impacted civilian areas. Now, this latest strike stands out for another reason. It marks the deadliest single attack since late February, when Pakistan launched airstrikes on more than 20 locations across Afghanistan, killing at least a reported 270. That round of fighting triggered direct retaliation, with Afghanistan forces attacking more than 50 Pakistani border positions and Kabul claiming it killed 55 Pakistani troops. On a less than positive note, both sides say they're prepared to keep fighting. Okay, coming up next in the back of the brief Western nations push back on President Trump's Hormuz coalition. Have you heard about this? More on that when we come back. Hey, Mike Baker here. Now, here's the hard truth. And I'm sorry to bring this up, but we are all getting older, right? And getting older can hit dudes pretty hard. With me, once I got into my 40s, it seemed like I was hitting a wall. Same workouts, same diet, but everything was just getting more difficult. You know what I'm talking about? Recovery slowed. Energy dipped. Very frustrating. The reality is most men lose about 1% of testosterone yearly after age 30 and still just life. But Mars Men, well, Mars Men helps free the usable testosterone with eight natural, clinically dosed ingredients. There's no synthetics, there's no needles. And here's the thing. Since starting up with Mars Men, my strength, recovery times, and steady daily energy have all improved. For a limited time, our listeners get 50 off for life. Get that 50 off for life plus free shipping and three free gifts@ Mengotomars.com that's Mengotomars.com for 50 off and three free gifts. You check out. After you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them. Do me a favor if you could tell them the PDB sent you. Hey, Mike Baker here. Let me take a moment to talk about personal finances and the importance of diversifying your assets. So here's the question. Do you own physical gold in today's world, with its ups and downs and general instability? And I think we've got some general instability out there. Owning gold is something that everyone should consider. And here's a top tip. Acre Gold makes it simple. That's Acre. Acre. With Acre Gold, you pick a plan that fits your budget, you make monthly payments, and when you've accumulated enough, well, they ship you a beautifully designed 24 karat Swiss gold bar. The gold is up 70% year over year. And central banks are still buying gold at record levels. The reality is smart money has been moving into hard assets for a reason. Acre Gold makes investing and owning gold easier than ever. And if I might just say, once you hold a physical asset like gold in your hand, now you understand the difference between owning something real, something physical, as compared to investments that are just numbers on a screen. And right now, the folks at Acre Gold are giving away two 5 gram ancient collection gold bars. You can enter for free for a chance to win the gold bars and also subscribe to Gold@getacregold.com PDB Once again, that's getacregold.com PDB Hey, Mike Baker here. Now look, I do not mess around when it comes to comfort. And if something's going to be part of my daily routine, well, it better be comfortable and it better hold up. And that's why I love Cozy Earth. Have you heard about them? Well, we recently tried their socks. My wife got a pair and noticed the difference right away. Said they were soft, breathable, comfortable all day, no bunching, no slipping. Who needs any of that? And look, they've got sock options for everything, right? They got working out socks, they got boot socks, they got lounging around the house socks. I kind of sound like Dr. Seuss. So I gave them a shot. And yes, they deliver. You put them on in the morning and that's the last time you think about them. And that is frankly what you should have with socks. Then there's the bedding. We got their comforter on the bed now and it's the same story. It's lightweight, doesn't trap heat, and just consistently comfortable, right? No overheating, no kicking it off halfway through the night, just solid sleep. And that's really what Cozy Earth does very well. No hype, just well made products that do what they're supposed to do with incredible comfort. And they back it up too. A 100 night sleep trial and a 10 year warranty. Think about that. A 10 year warranty? Come on. So you can try it out without taking a risk. Go check them out. You're going to like what you see. Discover how care in every detail transforms simple routines into real comfort. Head on over to cozyearth.com and use my code, PDB for up to 20 off. That's PDB for up to 20% off. And if you get a post purchase survey, well be sure to mention you heard about Cozy Earth right here on the pdb.
- [18:59]
B
It's tax season and at lifelock we know you're tired of numbers, but here's a big one you need to hear. Billions. That's the amount of money and refunds the IRS has flagged for possible identity fraud. Now here's another big number. 100 million. That's how many data points LifeLock monitors every second. If your identity is stolen, we'll fix it. Guarantee one last big number. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast for the threats you can't control. Terms apply
- [19:30]
A
in today's Back of the Brief Just one day after the White House laid out plans for a so called Hormuz coalition, sort of a coalition of the willing, that effort is now facing significant and frankly, somewhat predictable resistance from US Allies. As we told you on Monday, the Trump administration is working to assemble a multinational force to escort commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz after the conflict disrupted global oil flows through the Critical Waterway and sent prices skyward. But new reporting suggests that effort is struggling to gain traction. According to Axios, most NATO members and several partner countries have already informed the US that they do not want to participate in the coalition. In some cases, responses from foreign governments have ranged from skepticism to what one source described bluntly as hell no. The US has approached a wide group of countries about joining the effort, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Canada and several Gulf states, but so far none have publicly committed naval forces, and several have explicitly ruled it out. Germany's defense minister made that position clear, saying, quote, this is not our war, we have not started it, end quote. And European Union foreign policy chief Kayakalis echoed that sentiment, stating there is, quote, no appetite within the EU to join the mission, adding, quote, this is not Europe's war, end quote. Even among Washington's closest allies, the response appears mixed at best. President Trump claimed this week that the UK Would participate in and described French President Emmanuel macron as, quote, 8 out of 10 in terms of willingness to help. But behind the scenes, well, officials say that assessment may be overly optimistic. One source told Axios that while London is forward leaning, France has not committed and quote, at the moment it's a no. Countries in Asia are holding back as well. Japan and South Korea, both major importers of Gulf energy, have not signed on despite being directly affected by disruptions in the strait, and China, for its part, remains notably and predictably quiet. As we mentioned Monday, Beijing has little incentive to get involved. Chinese oil shipments are still moving through the strait with relatively little disruption, and China remains one of the largest buyers of Iranian crude, making it highly unlikely, and I would emphasize highly unlikely, that President Xi Jinping would be interested in sending naval forces into a potential confrontation with Tehran. At the same time, President Trump has responded with growing frustration. Speaking to reporters on Monday, Trump said he was, quote, greatly disappointed in countries that have declined to participate and warned that NATO's refusal to step up could have long term consequences. In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday, he called the alliance a, quote, one way street, adding that the US Spends heavily to protect its allies while receiving little support in return. He later went even further, lashing out and declaring in all caps we do not need the help of anyone, end quote. So on the one hand, the White House is still reportedly trying to build a coalition to help reopen the strait, but on the other, the President is now publicly downplaying the need for allied support and signaling that the US May be prepared to move forward without it. Officials say discussions are continuing behind the scenes and the US Is also conducting strikes on Iranian anti ship positions along the strait in an effort to weaken Tehran's ability to enforce the blockade. But the early pushback from allies and the increasingly sharp rhetoric from the White House suggests that assembling a broad international coalition may prove difficult. Although, and here's the caveat, if the Iranian regime is able to continue disrupting shipping through the strait, well, the growing economic pain in the global energy market and the consequential rising prices may eventually convince many of the nations that it's in their best interest to provide support to the US to secure the strait. And that, my friends, is the President's Daily brief for Wednesday, 18th March. Now if you have any questions or comments, and I hope you do, please reach out to me at pdb@the first tv.com and as you probably read in the gossip columns, you can have an ad free PDB experience simply by becoming a premium member of the President's Daily Brief by visiting PDB Premium. It's that simple. I'm Mike Baker and I'll be back later today with the PDB Afternoon Bulletin. Until then, stay informed, stay safe, stay cool.
- [24:27]
B
Warning the following ZipRecruiter radio spot you are about to hear is going to
- [24:31]
A
be filled with F words when you're hiring.
- [24:33]
C
We at ZipRecruiter know you can feel frustrated, forlorn, even, like your efforts are futile. And you can spend a fortune trying to find fabulous people only to get flooded with candidates who are just fine. Fortunately, ZipRecruiter figured out how to fix all that and right now you can try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com Zip with ZipRecruiter you can forget your frustrations because we find the right people for your role for fast, which is our absolute favorite F word. In fact, four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day.
- [25:09]
A
Fantastic.
- [25:11]
C
So whether you need to hire four, 40 or 400 people, get ready to meet first rate talent. Just go to ZipRecruiter.com Zip to try ZipRecruiter for free. Don't forget that's ZipRecruiter.com Zip finally, that ZipRecruiter.com Zip.