The President's Daily Brief – Afternoon Bulletin
Date: January 6, 2026
Host: Mike Baker (Former CIA Operations Officer)
Episode Focus:
- Why the Trump administration is refusing to back Venezuela’s opposition following Maduro’s ouster
- Israeli intelligence warning of an Iranian-backed assassination plot against Syria’s new president, Ahmed al-Sharah
Episode Overview
In this episode, Mike Baker delves deep into two major international developments: the Trump administration's controversial decision not to back Venezuela's Nobel-winning opposition leader, Marina Corinachado, after the fall of Nicolás Maduro, and fresh Israeli intelligence suggesting Iran may be plotting to assassinate Syria’s recently installed president, Ahmed al-Sharah. Baker explores the strategic logic, risks, and regional implications of both stories.
Key Topics and Insights
1. The United States and Venezuela’s Opposition
[00:12–09:46]
The Big Question: Why isn’t the Trump administration supporting Venezuela’s opposition?
- The ouster of Nicolás Maduro created expectations for swift US backing of opposition leader and Nobel laureate Marina Corinachado.
- However, recent New York Times reporting (cited by Baker) reveals the Trump administration decided—even before Maduro’s fall—to withhold support from Corinachado.
Administration Thinking and Intelligence Assessments
-
US intelligence believed Corinachado’s coalition, despite electoral legitimacy, lacked real control over vital state institutions (military, bureaucracy, security services).
-
Quote (Mike Baker, 02:22): “Analysts warned that any attempt to install the opposition would likely collapse quickly unless the US was prepared to maintain a sustained military presence in Venezuela.”
-
Secretary of State Marco Rubio cautioned that direct US support for the opposition could destabilize Venezuela further, potentially entangling the US in an open-ended commitment.
Erosion of Trust in Machado’s Leadership
-
Senior US officials found Corinachado overestimated Maduro’s weakness.
-
Baker on opposition’s failing strategy:
- Quote (03:33): “Officials grew increasingly frustrated with her assessments… consistently overstated how weak the regime was and underestimated its resilience.”
-
Doubts about the opposition’s ability to actually govern were heightened by their inability to provide a clear transition plan, especially regarding their surrogate candidate Edmundo Gonzalez after Corinachado was barred from running.
Diplomatic and Strategic Disconnects
- An attempt by envoy Richard Grinnell to meet Corinachado failed; she declined despite security assurances.
- Requests from the US for lists of political prisoners and concrete transition plans went unanswered, further souring relations.
Washington’s Chosen Path
-
Instead of endorsing the opposition, the administration chose to engage with Maduro’s vice president, Dely Rodriguez, as interim leader.
- Baker’s Analysis (05:01): “Not as an endorsement of the old regime, but as a way to keep the country functioning without plunging it into chaos.”
-
Critics, including Venezuelan opposition figures, warn this risks merely preserving or rearranging the same corrupt regime:
- Quote (Baker referencing the Times, 06:37): “The US appears to be betting on reforms, not on a revolution.”
-
Baker warns that these moves may damage US credibility and risk entrenching corrupt power structures, comparing it to pressure for easy peace deals elsewhere:
- Quote (08:01): “…is it anything more than a reshuffling of bad actors?”
Risks of the "Stability First" Approach
- Baker points out that the new Rodriguez regime is reportedly beginning to repress opposition:
- “There’s already reporting that the new Rodriguez regime is jailing journalists and hunting down anyone they feel supported the capture of Maduro.” (08:30)
2. Iran’s Alleged Assassination Plot Against Syria’s President
[10:10–End]
Fresh Contacts Between Israel and Syria
- Israel and Syria are cautiously exploring renewed diplomatic contacts.
- Israeli intelligence believes Iran sees this as a threat and may be plotting to assassinate President Ahmed al-Sharah to disrupt the process.
Israeli Defense Perceptions and Responses
- The plot is seen as part of a larger Iranian campaign to maintain influence in Damascus.
- Security sources say Iran’s goal is to prevent any moves that might lessen its clout over Syria.
Israel’s Security Posture Post-October 2023
- After the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, Israel is more committed than ever to maintaining a strong military presence along its northern front.
- Quote (Baker relaying IDF thinking, 12:52): “The Israel Defense Force’s presence inside Syrian territory is described as a ‘primary shield… a necessary layer of protection for Israeli communities along the border.’”
Israel’s Military Framework in Syria
- Operations are structured into three zones:
- Contact Zone: Directly along the border—to prevent cross-border attacks.
- Security Belt: Up to 10 miles inside Syria aimed at disrupting terror group infiltration.
- Area of Influence: From Sharah to Damascus, kept demilitarized and closely monitored for Iranian proxy activity.
Strategic Implications
- The suspected assassination plot reinforces Israel’s longstanding assessment that Iran is the central destabilizing force in Syria and the broader region.
Memorable Quotes & Moments
- On US support in Venezuela ([02:22]):
- “Any attempt to install the opposition would likely collapse quickly unless the US was prepared to maintain a sustained military presence.”
- On Corinachado’s leadership ([03:33]):
- “Officials grew increasingly frustrated with her assessments… consistently overstated how weak the regime was and underestimated its resilience.”
- On Washington’s interim approach ([05:01]):
- “Not as an endorsement of the old regime, but as a way to keep the country functioning without plunging it into chaos.”
- On illusion of reform ([06:37]):
- “The US appears to be betting on reforms, not on a revolution.”
- On potential risks ([08:01]):
- “…is it anything more than a reshuffling of bad actors?”
- On Israel’s military posture ([12:52]):
- “The Israel Defense Force’s presence inside Syrian territory is described as a ‘primary shield… a necessary layer of protection for Israeli communities along the border.’”
Timestamps for Key Segments
- [00:12] — Brief introduction / Main theme
- [01:15] — Venezuela: Why isn’t the US backing the opposition?
- [03:30] — Concerns about Corinachado’s leadership and opposition weaknesses
- [05:00] — US engagement with Maduro regime figures
- [08:00] — Risk analysis: “Stability first” vs. real change
- [10:10] — Israel-Syria contacts, Iran’s alleged assassination plot
- [12:00] — Israeli security framework in Syria
Conclusion
Mike Baker’s analysis highlights the complexity and risk of recent US and Israeli policy choices: the US prioritizes immediate stability over democratic change in Venezuela, potentially at the cost of credibility and long-term reform, while Israel, rattled by recent violence, refuses to loosen its security grip on Syria—especially with credible threats reportedly orchestrated by Iran.
Baker’s closing message:
“Stay informed, stay safe, stay cool.”
