
Loading summary
Progressive Insurance Announcer
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible financial geniuses, monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds. Visit progressive.com to see if you could save Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations.
Mike Baker
Looking to diversify and protect your hard earned assets? Well, schedule a free consultation call with the Birch Gold Group. They're the precious metals specialists. Just text PDB to the number 989898 and you'll receive a free no obligation information kit. And learn how to convert an existing IRA or a 401k into a gold IRA. Again, just text PDB to the number 989898. It's Monday, the 22nd of September. Welcome to the President's Daily Brief. I'm Mike Baker, your eyes and ears on the world stage. And today, coming to you from looks like an airport lounge in an airport somewhere. Still on the road. All right, let's get briefed. First up, Russia is once again testing NATO. Three Russian fighter jets violated Estonian airspace in the most serious breach in years. Putin's actions have NATO leaders warning that the alliance is closer than ever to direct conflict. Later in the show, President Trump is warning Afghanistan's Taliban leaders return Bagram Air Base to US Control or face consequences. Of course, one could ask, why would the US Want Bagram back? Plus, the New York Times reports Trump's Justice Department shut down an FBI probe into border czar Tom Homan after he was caught on tape accepting a grocery bag full of cash. Well, I don't know about you, but I know that when I accept bags of fat stacks, there's usually an innocent explanation. We'll have those details. And in today's back of the brief, the National Counterterrorism center is warning that al Qaeda, remember them well, that al Qaeda's threat to the US hasn't gone away and may even be growing. That's the thing about the war on terrorism. You may be tired of talking about or thinking about terrorism, but the terrorists, they never tire of it. But first, today's pdb. Russia is once again testing NATO. And what's becoming clear is that a dangerous game of chicken is playing out over Eastern Europe. The latest flashpoint came just days ago when three Russian MiG 31 fighter jets crossed into the sovereign airspace of NATO member Estonia. The jets flew over Vendlu island in the Gulf of Finland and remained inside Estonia's territory for about 12 minutes, the longest such violation in years. For perspective, most Previous incursions lasted just seconds, quick passes that Moscow could dismiss as navigational errors. But 12 minutes is no mistake. It was deliberate. These aircraft had no flight plans filed, their transponders were switched off, and they refused to respond to communication attempts. Italian F35s assigned to NATO's Baltic Air Policing mission scrambled to intercept, but the Russian pilots ignored them, continuing their incursion until finally leaving Estonian skies. Estonian officials called the breach a, quote, brazen violation. Well, that's probably appropriate of sovereignty, and immediately invoked Article 4 of the NATO treaty, which calls for emergency consultations among alliance members whenever the security of one state is threatened. Russia, for its part, flatly denied any violation. Well, there's a surprise. Claiming its aircraft remained over neutral waters. It's the same playbook we've seen from them before. Provocation, denial, and. And then blame shifting. And frankly, Russia continues to use the same playbook because it works. They're not, apparently concerned about NATO invoking Article 4. As we know, this isn't an isolated incident. This kind of testing of NATO airspace is becoming a pattern. Other frontline states, including Latvia and Lithuania, have raised alarms in recent months, pointing to a surge of Russian aircraft flying over the Baltic Sea with their transponders switched off. These are not routine patrols. They're designed to unsettle, to probe, and to send the message that Russia will not respect NATO's eastern flank, as we've already reported here on the PDB. Earlier this month, Moscow pushed even further when Russia launched a massive drone assault that spilled into Polish airspace between 19 and 23dr. Across the border overnight on September 9th and 10th, marking the most serious violation of NATO territory since Putin's invasion of Ukraine began. Polish defenses, aided by NATO allies, shot down several of the drones, but debris rained down near civilian areas. Warsaw responded by invoking Article 4, just as Estonia did, demanding consultations with its allies and stronger guarantees of defense. That Polish incident directly triggered NATO's launch of Operation Eastern Sentry, the new multinational air defense mission over Poland. And just this week, UK Typhoons began flying sorties over Polish skies as part of that mission. They're expected to be joined soon by aircraft from Denmark, France, and Germany. In other words, the air over Poland is now NATO's front line, a constant patrol zone meant to keep Russia in check. So what are we really seeing here? The answer is what military strategists call the escalation ladder. Step by step, Russia is climbing that ladder. Each violation, whether it's MiG31s lingering over Estonia, drones flying into Poland, or aircraft running dark with transponders switched off is a deliberate test. Moscow wants to probe NATO's vigilance, its rules of engagement, and most of all, its political will. It wants to normalize these provocations, to make them seem routine, all while avoiding direct confrontation. Push just far enough to rattle, but not far enough to trigger an immediate military response. For NATO, the dilemma is clear. Respond too lightly and Moscow will grow bolder. Respond too forcefully, and the risk of miscalculation spikes. That's why we're seeing Article 4 consultations, increased air patrols, and the creation of multinational missions like Eastern Sentry. These are carefully calibrated moves meant to reassure frontline allies while warning Russia not to push further. But here's the danger. The escalation ladder can have very unpredictable results. One drone strays too far. One Russian jet ignores an intercept. One NATO pilot makes a split second call, and suddenly the alliance is dealing with a downed aircraft or worse. That's the kind of incident that could put Article 5 NATO's collective defense clause on the table. And once that door opens, well, the path toward direct conflict becomes very short for countries like Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. These aren't abstract risks. They're living with them every day, watching Russian aircraft probe their borders, hearing the sound of NATO jets scrambling overhead, knowing that tomorrow's provocation could escalate into something far more serious. And for NATO as a whole, the credibility of its security guarantees is at stake. Every time Russia violates allied airspace, the alliance must respond, because if it doesn't, the deterrent power of NATO itself comes into question. That credibility is the cornerstone of European security, and it's exactly what. What Moscow is trying to undermine. So where does this leave us? Well, war is, of course, not inevitable, but we're in a situation where one miscalculation could drag NATO and Russia into a direct clash neither side wants. The question now is whether NATO can continue to manage that balance, deterring Moscow without tipping into escalation, or whether the next Russian provocation pushes the alliance over the edge. Putin, if he were a rational, clear thinking individual who sits on the normal logic train, well, he'd understand that if the Kremlin can't defeat Ukraine, they have no chance of taking on Ukraine, NATO and the US at the same time, he would also understand that NATO has no interest in encroaching on Russia. That's his old school Soviet upbringing, feeding his paranoia and delusions of rebuilding the Soviet Union in some fashion. But Putin doesn't have a seat on the logic train. You can't predict his intentions or thoughts by using traditional Western values and logic. In his mind, the glory of the Soviet Union needs to be revisited, and in that construct, he imagines NATO is somehow a threat to Mother Russia. Putin lives and thinks like he's stuck in the 1960s. Alright. Coming up after the break, President Trump threatens the Taliban over Bagram Air Base, and the New York Times report says the Trump administration's Justice Department shut down an FBI probe into border czar Tom Homan. I'll be right back. Hey, Mike Baker here. Let me ask you a question about protecting your hard earned assets. When you hear about inflation worries or when you hear that the national debt is over $37 trillion, will you just look around and see all the global uncertainty? Do you ever think to yourself, maybe now would be a good time to buy some gold? Well, you know what? That would be a logical thought you see, whether as a hedge against inflation, peace of mind during global instability, or just for sensible diversification, gold has always been viewed as a safe haven. And the Birch Gold Group believes every American should own physical gold. So they've created something special. Until September 30th. Until the end of this month, if you're a first time gold buyer, Birch Gold is offering a rebate of up to $10,000 in free metals on qualifying purchases. To claim eligibility and start the process, request an information kit now. Just text PD to 989898 plus Birch Gold can help you roll an existing IRA or a 401K into an IRA in gold and you're still eligible for a rebate in free metals of up to $10,000. Find out why tens of thousands of happy customers trust the Birch Gold Group and make right now the time to decide if gold is right for you and take advantage of a Rebate up to $10,000 when you buy by September 30th. Text PDB to 989898, claim your eligibility and get your free information kit. Text PDB to 989-898.
WhatsApp Advertiser
When did making plans get this complicated? It's time to streamline with WhatsApp, the secure messaging app that brings the whole group together. Use polls to settle dinner plans, send event invites and pin messages so no one forgets mom's 60th and never miss a meme or milestone. All protected with end to end encryption. It's time for WhatsApp message privately with everyone. Learn more@WhatsApp.com.
Mike Baker
Welcome back to the PDB. President Trump is making clear to Afghanistan's Taliban rulers that either they return bagram Air Base or brace for consequences. Four years after America's chaotic exit from the country over the weekend, the president took to truth social posting, quote, if Afghanistan doesn't give Bagram Air Base back to those that built it, the United States of America back, bad things are going to happen. Now. He wrote that last bit in all caps just so the Taliban will know he's serious. Because the Taliban hates all caps. Trump later demanded the base be handed over, quote, right away, and delivered an ominous promise of quote, if they don't do it, you're going to find out what I'm going to do, end quote. The president offered no elaboration on what his threat would entail. Now, this wasn't Trump's first demand for the Taliban to hand over the base. Days earlier in London, standing alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, he called the Biden administration's 2021 Afghanistan pull out a surrender, previewing his demand with what he teased as, quote, a little breaking news. His case for Bagram is this. The base sits, quote, an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons. So the point is clear. The air base's value stretches far past Kabul. Of course, the base sits in Afghanistan whether the US Likes it or not. A sovereign nation now run by the Taliban. It's probably worth asking, does the US really want to jump back into that hot mess? The history of Bagram only heightens the drama. For background, the base was built by the Soviets in the 1950s, later claimed and enhanced by US forces after 9 11. It was the crown jewel of America's two decade global war on terror, its largest military installation and the hub of air campaigns and special operations, as well as the ultimate symbol of American presence in Afghanistan before the Biden administration's poorly planned and executed midnight withdrawal back on July 1st of 2021. In that abandonment, American troops slipped out without telling Afghan allies, leaving behind more than $7 billion in military equipment, much of it later appropriated, of course, by Taliban fighters. Six weeks after the withdrawal, as Kabul fell, the Taliban seized the base. The only people who couldn't see that coming were folks who can't spell Afghanistan. By August of last year, the Taliban marked the third anniversary of their takeover with a triumphant display and parade of abandoned U.S. armor. In response to Trump's threats and social media posts, the Taliban didn't hesitate to push back. On Sunday, the Taliban's chief spokesman posted on X that Afghanistan's independence and territorial integrity were of the utmost importance, accusing Washington of violating the 2020 Doha Agreement, a deal Trump himself signed that pledged the US Would not threaten Afghan sovereignty. The spokesman in this post went on to urge Trump to adopt, quote, realism and rationality in the same breath. The Taliban underscored ongoing negotiations with US Envoys, including a supposed prisoner swap arrangement. Although Washington has not confirmed the details of such talks, what is known is that earlier this year, White House hostage envoy Adam Bowler quietly traveled to Kabul for face to face talks with the Taliban's foreign minister, the first such meeting since that 2021 disastrous pullout. The visit centered on now released American hostage George Glesman, who had also touched on broader diplomatic ties and even investment prospects. According to a Taliban readout for Trump demanding Bagram's return is a chance to rewrite what he brands Biden's greatest foreign policy failure and to be within a short strategic flight of Beijing's nuclear sites at the same time. Okay, Shifting gears to US Domestic issues, President Trump's border czar Tom Homan was reportedly caught on audio tape in an FBI sting pocketing $50,000 in cash, a case of the Trump White House dismissed as politically driven and legally hollow. Back In September of 2024, undercover agents posing as a businessman handed home in a grocery bag stuffed with fat stacks during what officials described as a long running counterintelligence probe that hadn't even targeted Homan to begin with. The meeting was captured on audio tape, and Homan allegedly floated the idea to the supposed businessman that he could help secure border contracts in a future Trump administration. When recently pressed by News Nation correspondent Homan did not hold back, calling the allegations, quote, bullshit. According to people familiar with the FBI case, Homan was drawn into the sting only after a separate pro Target suggested in 2023 that paying him $1 million could open the door to immigration and border security contracts. By the following year, the FBI had set up its operation inside the Justice Department. Prosecutors weighed charges ranging from wire fraud to bribery and conspiracy, but in the end, they concluded the case was too thin and it crumbled. And here's something I'd like to point out. Homan wasn't in government at the time, had no binding promises and Supreme Court rulings in recent years, and have sharply narrowed what counts as corruption. In the end, federal officials concluded the elements just weren't there. According to msnbc, the first to report the sting, investigators intended to wait and see if Homan followed through, but the matter fizzled out once Trump returned to the White House. FBI Director Cash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche have since defended the case's shutdown, stressing That a full review found, quote, no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing. Patel added that the DOJ must keep its eye on real threats, not, quote, baseless investigations. The Trump administration has doubled down. Spokeswoman Abigail Jackson branded the sting a, quote, blatantly political investigation left over from the Biden era. She accused liberals of wasting resources targeting Trump allies while ignoring, quote, real criminals and the millions of illegal aliens who flooded our country. Jackson underscored that Homan had, quote, not been involved in any contract award decisions, praising him instead as a, quote, lifelong public servant doing a phenomenal job. The broader context matters here. Holman, who once ran Immigration and Customs Enforcement during Trump's first term, went on to launch a consulting business for companies seeking immigration related contracts. Homan had long telegraphed his intent to return to a White House administration. Writing on social media in November 2023, quote, I promised President Trump that if he goes back, I go back and I'm going to run the biggest deportation operation this country's ever seen, end quote. And today, as our listeners know, that pledge is in motion. Democrats claim the investigation was shut down to shield Trump's ally, but the administration remains firm that it was just another Biden era partisan fishing expedition, and it collapsed when real legal scrutiny was applied for Homan himself. The sting has well done little to dent his standing at the center of Trump's immigration machine. Now, what isn't clear in the information released to date is why Holman was accepting the cash. It appears that he was offering future consideration if and when he became a senior member of a future Trump administration. Now, I'm not a lawyer, so I won't speak to whether or not the legal case in the now dismissed investigation was sound or weak. But I think most people could agree the optic ain't good. Accepting a sack stuffed with $50,000 in cash for whatever reason sounds sketchy. At a minimum, it's not unreasonable that Homan and the administration should provide a more transparent explanation than it's bullshit. If it's legitimately bullshit, then provide sufficient transparency so that it doesn't become another self inflicted wound. Coming up next. In today's Back of the Brief, a new intelligence memo says Al Qaeda and its Yemen affiliate remain determined to strike the US More on that when we come back. Hey, Mike Baker here. Let me take just a moment to talk about your personal finances. Now, the Fed has finally dropped interest rates and, and that's great news for American homeowners. After all, expenses have been a major burden on families, wages are flat, and prices keep climbing and for many the only way to make ends meet is to lean on credit cards. But that cycle of high interest debt makes it hard to stay ahead. So if you're a homeowner, I want you to call my friends over at American Financing. With credit cards charging rates around 20% or higher, you should look at the potential to use your home equity to save money. There's an easy path to see how you can finally put your hard earned equity to work for you. American Financing can help you pay off that expensive debt, free up your cash flow and keep your budget under control. Their salary based mortgage consultants are saving customers an average of $800 a month and if you get started today, you may even be able to delay your next mortgage payment. Take control. Call American Financing today 866-885-1881 that's 866-885-1881 or just visit American Financing Do.
Shopify Advertiser
Running a business comes with a lot of what ifs, but luckily there's a simple answer to Shopify. It's the commerce platform behind millions of businesses including Thrive Cosmetics and Momofuku, and it'll help you with everything you need. From website design and marketing to boosting sales and expanding operations. Shopify can get the job done and make your dream a reality. Turn those what ifs into Sign up for your $1 per month trial@shopify.com SpecialOffer.
AM PM Advertiser 1
What do you think makes the perfect snack?
AM PM Advertiser 2
Hmm, it's gotta be when I'm really craving it and it's convenient.
AM PM Advertiser 1
Could you be more specific?
AM PM Advertiser 2
When it's cravinient. Okay, like a freshly baked cookie made with real butter available right down the street at a.m. p.m. Or a savory breakfast sandwich I can grab in just a second at a.m. pM.
AM PM Advertiser 1
I'm seeing a pattern here.
AM PM Advertiser 2
Well yeah, we're talking about what I.
AM PM Advertiser 1
Crave, which is anything from AM pm.
AM PM Advertiser 2
What more could you want? Stop by AM PM where the snacks and drinks are perfectly craveable and convenient. And that's Cravenians Ampm. Too much good stuff.
Mike Baker
In today's Back of the Brief Nearly a quarter century after the 911 terror attacks, Al Qaeda is once again signaling it wants to strike America. Washington's top counterterrorism officials are sounding the alarm. In a memo sent to law enforcement Friday, the U.S. national Counterterrorism center, better known as the NCTC, warned that Al Qaeda and its Yemen based affiliate Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula are actively trying to weaponize propaganda and global conflicts, especially those involving U.S. troops, to spark fresh attacks. The center warned that the Islamic terror group's recent calls for violence are a stark reminder of Al Qaeda's enduring intent and capability worldwide. The memo went beyond abstract threats. Federal and local officials were urged to tighten their own personal security, such as being aware of any surveillance, not advertising travel plans and concealing badges outside the workplace. But it also flagged the American public's vulnerability, pointing to so called, quote, soft targets like sports arenas, concerts and other mass gatherings. Created in 2004 under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the NCTC stressed that its coordination with state and local law enforcement is meant to give agencies, quote, the tools to combat target attempts by Al Qaeda. The group designated a foreign terrorist organization for more than 25 years continues to adapt. A Department of Homeland Security report issued late last year went further, concluding al Qaeda has, quote, reinvigorated its outreach to Western audiences and remains committed to striking inside the U.S. according to the warnings, the Islamic terror group continues to probe for weak spots. And once again, US Security officials are pressing for vigilance at home. And that, my friends, is the President's Daily brief for Monday, 22nd September. Now, if you have any questions or comments, please reach out to me at pdb@the first tv.com now. I hope you had a chance over the weekend to catch our latest episode of the PDB Situation Report. As always, you can watch it and past episodes on our YouTube channel at President's Daily Brief and on all podcast platforms. I'm Mike Baker and I'll be back later today with the PDB Afternoon Bulletin. Until then, stay informed, stay safe, stay cool.
Unidentified Speaker
It.
Host: Mike Baker
Episode: September 22, 2025: NATO and Russia Edge Toward Direct Conflict & Trump’s Warning to the Taliban
Date: September 22, 2025
This episode delivers an intelligence-driven summary of escalating global security concerns, focusing first on recent direct provocations between Russia and NATO, then examining President Trump’s public threats to the Taliban regarding Bagram Air Base, and finally spotlighting renewed warnings about al Qaeda’s threat to the United States. Host Mike Baker, a former CIA operations officer, explains why these developments matter for U.S. national security and analyzes their broader implications.
[00:29–09:58]
[11:10–15:53]
[15:53–20:24]
[21:27–23:50]
| Timestamp | Speaker | Quote | |-----------|--------------|-------| | 02:08 | Mike Baker | “But 12 minutes is no mistake. It was deliberate. These aircraft had no flight plans filed, their transponders were switched off, and they refused to respond to communication attempts.” | | 05:39 | Mike Baker | “Each violation... is a deliberate test. Moscow wants to probe NATO’s vigilance, its rules of engagement, and most of all, its political will.” | | 07:11 | Mike Baker | “One drone strays too far. One Russian jet ignores an intercept. One NATO pilot makes a split second call, and suddenly the alliance is dealing with a downed aircraft or worse.” | | 11:33 | Mike Baker (reading Trump) | “If Afghanistan doesn’t give Bagram Air Base back to those that built it, the United States of America back, bad things are going to happen.” | | 19:54 | Mike Baker | “Accepting a sack stuffed with $50,000 in cash for whatever reason sounds sketchy... If it’s legitimately bullshit, then provide sufficient transparency so that it doesn’t become another self-inflicted wound.” | | 21:54 | Mike Baker | “The NCTC warned that the Islamic terror group’s recent calls for violence are a stark reminder of Al Qaeda’s enduring intent and capability worldwide.” |
| Segment | Time | |------------------------------|--------------| | Russia-NATO Escalation | 00:29–09:58 | | Trump’s Taliban Warning | 11:10–13:58 | | Bagram Air Base Context | 13:58–15:53 | | FBI Probe into Tom Homan | 15:53–20:24 | | Al Qaeda Counterterrorism | 21:27–23:50 |
True to Mike Baker’s direct, wry tone, the episode balances urgency with measured skepticism—especially in analyzing the motivations of Russia, the Taliban, and U.S. political actors alike. Humorous asides underscore serious points (“...the Taliban hates all caps” at 11:37) and Baker consistently calls for transparency and realism from leaders on all sides.
Listeners come away armed with concise, critical updates on the world’s most pressing challenges—and perspective on why these seemingly distant events could matter for American security and politics.