Why Markets Don't Panic Anymore + How to Build Real Relationships at Work

Summary

---

The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

Episode: Why Markets Don't Panic Anymore + How to Build Real Relationships at Work
Date: May 13, 2026
Host: Scott Galloway

---

Episode Overview

In this episode, Scott Galloway tackles two central themes:

1. The resilience of modern financial markets in the face of turmoil, and the role of algorithmic and AI-driven trading in moderating panic.
2. Building authentic relationships at work—especially for introverts—and strategies for networking, career growth, and mentorship in today’s competitive environment.

Listener questions drive the conversation, covering issues of market volatility, workplace relationships for introverts, and the cost/benefit calculus of city living for ambitious professionals.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Why Markets Don’t Panic Anymore ([02:06]–[10:14])

Listener Question:

Why do markets seem more resilient now? Are electronic and AI-driven trading systems making it harder for mass panic and downturns? What about the risks?

Scott’s Analysis:

• Danger of Assuming "It's Different This Time"

  • “It's always dangerous to think it's different this time and the market is resilient. As a matter of fact, you just saying that is in my opinion a little bit of a sell signal.” ([03:04])
  • References to the dot-com bubble as a cautionary tale about thinking fundamentals don’t matter.

• How Market Mechanisms Have Changed

  • Algorithmic Trading Dominates:
    • “Algorithmic trading accounts for roughly 60 to 75% of total trading volume… Equity market in the U.S. algorithmic trading grew from about 15% of equity volume in 2003 to over 70% by 2010, and has since plateaued around 70 to 80%.” ([04:36])
  • Rise of Index Funds and Passive Investing:
    • "Index funds now account for 57% of equity funds by assets, up from 36% in 2016." ([05:13])
    • Passive investors "don’t panic—they just rebalance on a schedule."
    • “In 2024, the assets under management of passive funds surpassed that of active funds for the first time.” ([05:45])
  • Behavioral Impact:
    • Algorithms “don’t really panic. They don't read a scary headline and sell everything.” ([06:30])
    • “Algorithms reduce volatility partly by dampening investor sentiment and herd behavior. Basically, they stop the crowd from stampeding in stable periods.” ([06:42])
  • Flash Crashes and Systemic Risks:
    • “During severe stress, though, a firm's decision to scale back can create a sudden liquidity gap… when every algorithm steps away at once, there’s no one left to buy.”
    • Example: “The October 2024 yen flash crash… a 3% drop in 90 seconds triggered by algorithms hitting their own kill switches in a feedback loop.” ([07:12])

• Advice to Individual Investors

  • “Diversification is really powerful.” ([08:43])
  • “You could sell everything you have in your company and you’d still be heavily invested because your most important capital is your time.” ([08:50])
  • Encourages putting the bulk of a portfolio in diversified, low-cost index funds and notes that the S&P 500 is now highly concentrated in Big Tech (10 companies = 40% of the index).
  • Suggests geographic and asset-class diversification.

• Scott’s Personal Anecdote:

  • Burned by overinvesting in his own startup (“Red Envelope”) and losing everything when it went bankrupt—underscoring the importance of diversification.

Memorable Quotes:

• "If you think you're a stock picker... you're competing against an algorithm that looks at millions of points of data designed by a ton of PhDs... and you're watching CNBC or deciding because you see a long line outside of Chipotle that you're somehow informed." ([05:06])
• “The majority should go into index funds.” ([09:44])
• "Be really careful... that was the Peter Lynch 80s method of investing. Diversification, low cost index funds." ([10:08])

---

2. How to Build Real Relationships at Work (Especially as an Introvert) ([10:14]–[18:05])

Listener Question:

How can a quieter, introverted professional connect with senior leaders, overcome imposter syndrome, and build meaningful relationships at work without faking extroversion?

Scott’s Analysis & Advice:

• On His Own Experience:

  • "I'm paid to be an extrovert, but I'm actually an introvert." ([10:40])
  • Recalls early consulting days and the pressure to build client relationships—found it “exhausting.”

• Strategies for Introverts

  • Play to Your Strengths:
    • “Let your work show up and do the pitching for you.” ([13:49])
    • “Being quieter, who shows up prepared, writes really well, thoughtfully sends notes of gratitude, sends notes of congratulations...” ([12:12])
  • Leverage Alternative Mediums:
    • Build relationships via thoughtful emails, forwarding useful information, written praise, or thank-you notes.
  • Mentoring Others:
    • “Introverts are sometimes better at building relationships with people below them... champion them, mentor them, take them aside, teach them.” ([15:01])
    • “People notice. Senior managers notice when you take the time to mentor younger people and provide them really robust feedback.” ([16:32])
  • Be Proactive About Saying Yes:
    • "A lot of the times, is it do you really feel awkward or would you just rather be doing something else? If it’s just you would rather be doing something else, then okay, make the effort." ([17:20])
    • Advocates pushing outside comfort zones by accepting more invitations (“Say yes more”).

• Overall Message:

  • Success isn’t reserved for extroverts—introverts excel by leveraging authenticity, preparation, mentorship, and written communication. Sales jobs may favor extroverts, but leadership and influence often look different.

Memorable Quotes:

• “There is a lot of room for the person who’s more measured, listens more than they speak, and kind of shows up with their work and their data and their kindness.” ([12:56])
• “There is a certain power and grace and dignity in that.” ([13:41])
• “The meek will inherit the earth. I don’t buy that. But there are a lot of introverts who do really well by showing up and communicating nonverbally with their kindness, their work, and their confidence.” ([17:53])

---

3. The ROI of City Living for Young Professionals ([18:47]–[22:45])

Listener Question:

Given the high cost of living in big cities, is the ROI of city living still worth it for those who aren’t wealthy?

Scott’s Perspective:

• Why City Life as a Young Professional Is Worth It:

  • “That’s why you want to get to a city when you’re young.” ([18:50])
  • Shares his own post-college experience in NYC—living with roommates, “you can do that when you’re young.”

• Acknowledges Increased Hardship & Costs:

  • “It’s gotten much harder in big cities because of inflation.” ([19:57])
  • Recognizes limits: almost impossible when you have kids unless you’re “making a shit ton of money.”

• Policy Commentary:

  • “We need to lower taxes on lower earners… tax credits for more building, more housing.” ([20:19])

• Long-Term Benefit:

  • “Being in New York from 2000 to 2011 was incredibly productive for me. I made a lot of progress, established… a lot of credibility teaching at NYU.” ([20:49])
  • Suggests doing an "arbitrage": gain the experience/credentials in a city, then relocate to a more affordable location.

• Final Take:

  • “It’s not an option for 90%… but it probably is an option for about half of young people.” ([22:10])
  • Cities concentrate “ideas, capital, creativity and culture... you’re just going to bump off more ideas and more opportunity in a city.”
  • “If you’re an economic animal, 2/3 of economic growth is going to happen in one of 20 cities. Get to the city. Do it while you’re young.” ([22:37])

Memorable Quotes:

• “Ideas need to have sex, and you’re just going to bump off more ideas and more opportunity in a city.” ([22:28])
• "I stand by it. If you're an economic animal, 2/3 of economic growth is going to happen in one of 20 cities. Get to the city. Do it while you're young." ([22:37])

---

Notable Quotes (with Timestamps)

• "It's always dangerous to think it's different this time and the market is resilient. As a matter of fact, you just saying that is in my opinion a little bit of a sell signal." [03:04] — Scott Galloway
• “If you think you're a stock picker... you're competing against an algorithm that looks at millions of points of data designed by a ton of PhDs...” [05:06] — Scott Galloway
• “The S&P is no longer an index fund. It's a fund that's basically betting on big tech, specifically 10 companies which comprise 40% of the S&P.” [09:53] — Scott Galloway
• “I'm paid to be an extrovert, but I'm actually an introvert.” [10:40] — Scott Galloway
• “Let your work show up and do the pitching for you.” [13:49] — Scott Galloway
• “Say yes more. Mentor your younger employees. Find different mediums where you can be a little more extroverted.” [17:43] — Scott Galloway
• “Ideas need to have sex, and you're just going to bump off more ideas and more opportunity in a city.” [22:28] — Scott Galloway
• “Get to the city. Do it while you’re young, because… it gets increasingly hard and sometimes just not doable as you get older.” [22:37] — Scott Galloway

---

Segment Timestamps

• Why Markets Don’t Panic Anymore: [02:06]–[10:14]
• Building Relationships at Work (Introverts): [10:14]–[18:05]
• ROI of City Living: [18:47]–[22:45]

---

Summary

This episode of The Prof G Pod explores how algorithmic and passive investing have made stock markets more resilient to panic, but not immune to systemic shocks or flash crashes. Scott Galloway urges individual investors to embrace diversification, acknowledging the limits of human judgement versus algorithmic trading.

On workplace relationships, he champions introspective, authentic contributions, urging introverts to find their own channels for building connections—whether written, through mentoring, or by simply showing up with thoughtful preparation. For ambitious young professionals, Scott stands by his advice: if you can, spend your early career in a major city for the concentrated opportunity and exposure, even if the economics are tough.

Scott offers practical financial wisdom, empowering career guidance, and his characteristic blend of personal anecdotes and blunt, actionable advice for listeners at any career stage.

Transcript

[Scott Galloway]

When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit@ Indeed.com podcast. That's Indeed.com podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. This episode is brought to you by Palmolive. Family time isn't just the big moments. It's weeknight dinners, sitting around the table, everyone talking all at once. So when the plates are empty and the sink is full, use Palmolive Ultra. Palmolive's most powerful formula removes up to 99.9% of grease, leaving your dishes sparkling clean. And the new, convenient pump makes cleaning even easier so you can spend less time tackling dishes and more time together. Shop now at palmolive. Chronic migraine 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more, can make me feel like a spectator in my own life. Botox Anabotulinum Toxin a prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine. It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It's the number one prescribed branded chronic migraine preventive treatment.

[Listener/Caller]

Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems or muscle weakness can be signs of a life threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions including als, Lou Gehrig's disease, Myasthenia gravis or Lambert Eaton syndrome, and medications including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.

[Host/Interviewer]

Why wait?

[Scott Galloway]

Ask your doctor, visit botoxchronicmigraine.com or call 1-844botox to learn more.

[Host/Interviewer]

Welcome to Office Hours with Prof. G. This is the part of the show where we answer questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship and whatever else is on your mind. If you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording to office hoursproptam media.com Again, that's officehoursoproportunia.com or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we just might feature it in our next episode. Our first question comes from PreviousGolf95:41 on Reddit they say hi Scott, love your stuff and thanks for what you do. I don't trade individual stocks except for my company through the Employee Stock Purchase Program, which I liquidate as it becomes eligible to buy index funds. Therefore, the S and P is really what matters to my returns. I keep hearing you and others express fascination at the resilience of the market in the face of pandemics, tariffs, elections, wars and AI. Could part of what's going on here be advances in electronic trading tech that are modulating reactive trading? I'm talking about so called robo traders, but I feel like it's more nuanced than that as AI is further integrated into market strategy and trading tech. Is it better at dampening emotion and panic that would have led to severe market downturns in the past? Is AI better at buying the dip? Do we know about AI traders and the risks involved? Thank you for your thoughts. My immediate reaction is it's always dangerous to think it's different this time and the market is resilient. As a matter of fact, you just saying that is in my opinion a little bit of a sell signal. I remember in the late 90s when the Nasdaq surged past any rational number, there was an article in the Wall Street Journal saying maybe we have moved to a different evolution of our economy where valuations should be fundamentally repriced. And of course 2000 came and said no, fundamentals still matter. So what this question really gets to is the following. Has the market composition changed so fundamentally that the old emotional panic dynamics no longer apply in the same way? The honest answer is yes, maybe. Now the honest answer is maybe, but we don't know where. You do see what I'll call buy the dip sooner creating shallower dips is in geopolitical meteors. So the war in Iran you would think wow, massive dip, 911 pandemic. But what you've seen with these geopolitical occurrences is there's a dip and the market almost always in the following year, sometimes the following months rips back so the market has a memory and says well why don't we buy back sooner and make money? So the dips have become less severe as evidenced by the fact that the S and P has hit an all time high as we continue to what feels like enter into a deeper and deeper quagmire in Iran So what do we know? Algorithmic trading accounts for roughly 60 to 75% of total trading volume. Think about that. Three quarters of trading is a computer in the equity market in the U.S. algorithmic trading grew from about 15% of equity volume in 2003 to over 70% by 2010, and has since plateaued around 70 to 80%. So if you think you're a stock picker, just keep in mind you're competing against an algorithm that looks at millions of points of data designed by a ton of PhDs making a lot of money all in a room who do nothing but try and pick up on signals. And you're watching CNBC or deciding because you see a long line outside of Chipotle that you're somehow informed on the markets anyways. Which begs the question, what even is the market anymore? Index funds now account for 57% of equity funds by assets, up from 36% in 2016. In 2024, US based equity index funds inflows of registered inflows of 415 billion year to date, compared to outflows of 341 billion for active managers. Passive investors, by definition, don't panic. They just rebalance on a schedule. In 2024, the assets under management of passive funds surpassed that of active funds for the first time, and its market share continues to climb. Institutional Investors account for 61% of the algorithmic trading market. The retail segment is expanding, but at a much smaller base. So does algorithmic trading really affect volatility stocks? Here's what the research says. Algorithms don't really panic. They don't read a scary headline and sell everything. Studies suggest algorithms reduce volatility partly by dampening investor sentiment and herd behavior. Basically, they stop the crowd from stampeding in stable periods. Algorithmic trading provides a steady stream of orders that keeps markets liquid and prices tight. But during severe stress, though, a firm's decision to scale back can create a sudden liquidity gap. And when every algorithm steps away at once, there's no one left to buy. So see above another type of stampede. The October 2024 yen flash crash is a recent example. A 3% drop in 90 seconds triggered by algorithms hitting their own kill switches in a feedback loop. And in some cases, algorithmic traders can actually exploit volatile periods, placing directional bets that generate even more volatility. Researchers call it chicken and egg problem because the causal evidence still isn't settled. So what to do with this? First off, you had said that as soon as you got liquidity in your stocks, you sold. I think that's a good idea. I mean, if you're on the inside and you see that your company's just compounding like crazy and it feels like a decent valuation, okay, maybe leave some in. But generally speaking, you could sell everything you have in your company and you'd still be heavily invested because your most important capital is your time. So you're investing a lot of capital into one company. But I'm a big fan of diversifying. Once you have an asset base. And all these stories about Mark Zuckerberg reinvesting in his company or Steve Ballmer borrowing against his stock in Microsoft to buy more stock in Microsoft, those make the headlines. What doesn't make the headlines is what happened to me. And I fell into this bullshit notion that my venture capitalists instilled in me that, scott, are you in it to win it? And when I started coming out red envelope, and I took every penny I had and kept reinvesting in red envelope. And then when it went bankrupt in 2008, I woke up at 42 and had nothing, actually less than nothing. I think I was in debt. So diversification is really powerful. Also, you're going to be tempted to pick stocks. Occasionally. You might get some sort of asymmetric opportunity to invest in a private company where you think there's a lot of upside or you get. Or you just have a lot of confidence in something. Fine, have at it. Pretend you can pick stocks better than other people. Take 30%, no more of your portfolio and have some fun with it. And then over the long term, your winners will stay front of your prefrontal cortex or front of your lobe, and you'll convince yourself you're better than Warren Buffett. You aren't, but have at it. Have some fun. And who knows, maybe you get some opportunities other people don't. But I do believe the majority should go into index funds. Now, here's the wrinkle. The S and P is no longer an index fund. It's a fund that's basically betting on big tech, specifically 10 companies which compromise 40% of the S and P. So I think if you're going to do index funds, you want to be diversified across asset classes and just as importantly, across regions. My kind of Stock pick for 2025 was Big Tech was Google and also emerging markets, who had underperformed the US for 15 years. And I thought that you'd see a reversion in the flows of the rivers of capital. And we've begun to see that anyways. In sum, I think that it is more reason to be diversified and more reason to be an index and low cost diversified index and maybe quant funds because you are up against PhDs and technology that your brain and your gut and your patterns of observation around. Oh my gosh, ton of people going into Zara. I just love this Zara top. I'm going to buy it. That was kind of the Peter Lynch 80s method of investing. I would be really careful with that. Diversification, low cost index funds. And also I think you're smart to be selling regularly shares in your company because you're already very invested there. Thanks for the question.

[Listener/Caller]

Hi Scott. I'm a quieter, more introverted person and I struggle with social anxiety and some imposter syndrome at work. I know building relationships with senior leaders is important, but I feel like I don't have much in common with them and I'm not great at small talk or banter. How do I actually connect better with them without it feeling forced or awkward? Thanks for taking my question, Daniel.

[Host/Interviewer]

I relate to this and I think a lot of people relate to this. I'm paid to be an extrovert, but I'm actually an introvert. And my first firm was a firm called Profit Brand Strategy. And I started my second year of business school and my job was basically to go get new clients and then deliver kind of the final consulting, you know, the final sort of consulting findings and consulting essentially back then was you established a proxy, you know, kind of a proxy. Father, son, brother to brother and I use mail. It was all men back then. When I was consulting in the 90s, all my kind of biggest clients once I got above CMO were mentioned and I worked with the CEOs of Williams Sonoma, Levi Strauss and Co. Dreyers. You know, just these big companies and you would establish these deep or really strong relationships. And I found it exhausting. One of the things I did when I sold the company is I literally made the conscious decision I am never going to play golf again. It's a wonderful sport, but six hours on a Sunday takes you away from your family. I just, and I didn't like constantly trying to establish these friendships. The best wealth managers, the best salespeople are extroverts. And it just comes naturally to them. They just like people. You can't fake it. And because I was younger and really hungry, I could sort of fake it. But as I've gotten older, I've become much more introverted. So what can you do? Introversion is usually to a certain extent that you are not comfortable being very social in A certain medium. What do I mean by that? You're not as social in the office. In person, however, you can be social and thoughtful in different mediums. So there are people in my company who will forward stuff to me or write really thoughtful emails about stuff, or create connections that establish a bond. And that is they do good work, they send a congratulatory email, but they're not extroverted. Also, I do think that as the world becomes more competitive, the kind of intra office relationships and ass kissing has become less important. Unfortunately, it probably hasn't, but I do think there's other ways of establishing credibility other than being kind of the guy or gal with the bright shiny suit. One, you're going to have to have a certain level of comfort around people. That's just. It sucks to be a grownup. If you want to be a senior executive, you have to figure out a way to present. But being sort of the quieter one who shows up prepared, who writes really well, thoughtfully, sends notes of gratitude, sends notes of congratulations. And also I think there is a lot of room for the person who's more measured, listens more than they speak, and kind of shows up with their work and their data and their kindness. So I don't know if I have. And also I would avoid sales jobs, but I think being kind of the more reserved person who just lets your work speak for them, I think there's a certain power and grace and dignity in that. So I wouldn't be too worried. I think you let your work show up and do the pitching for you, but do try to develop and establish relationships in other formats. You know, when I give bonuses or I do something for people, some of them, a third of them will send me a card to saying, I very much appreciate working here in the bonus. I mean, you don't have to be an introvert or an extrovert to do that. You just have to be thoughtful and go to, you know, and send a card or send an email. And that's a form of relationship building. Another way to build relationships. Introverts are sometimes better at building relationships with people below them. And that is really try to champion them, mentor them, take them aside, teach them, be a player, coach. What does that mean? Sit down with them, show them, don't give them feedback, give them instruction. You could edit this a little bit better. This is how I would do it. Pull up the chair next to them and do it. I found that extroverts are great at managing up and managing out, but sometimes introverts are better at managing sideways and down because they have an easier time or a little less, I don't know, intimidated by their junior employees but can play a role in mentoring them and helping upskill them. And your senior managers will know that I know the people. People notice. I always say to the employees, I've never run a big company, but I've run small and medium sized companies and the employees make the mistake of thinking we don't notice. And that is if you take the time to mentor younger people and train them and provide them really robust feedback, really thoughtful, supportive feedback, especially young people who need a lot of watering notes, praise instruction. Senior managers notice. So I don't know if I have any blinding insight here my man, other than to say that introverts, a lot of introverts do really, really well. And I feel you. The other thing is just to say yes a lot. I was around this weekend. I got invited out Friday and Saturday night. I didn't want to go out. I went to dinner with my sons. But then I forced myself to go out after and meet with people. A lot of the times is it do you really feel awkward or would you just rather be doing something else? And if it's just you would rather be doing something else, then okay, make the effort. Go out, talk to people, get to know them. I find as I get older the bands within, you know, the, the boundaries within which the people and situations I'm comfortable in are narrowing. And what I have to do is push them out by saying yes more. Anyways, say yes more. Mentor your younger employees. Find different mediums where you can be a little bit more extroverted. Whether it's posting things or writing about things or sending people notes. But the world, you know, they say the meek will inherit the earth. I don't buy that. But there are a lot of introverts who do really well by showing up and communicating non verbally with their kindness and their work and their confidence. Thanks for the question. We'll be right back after a quick break. Support for the show comes from LinkedIn. It's a shame when the best B2B marketing gets wasted on the wrong audience. Like imagine running an ad for cataract surgery on Saturday morning cartoons. Or running a promo for this show on a video about Roblox or something. No offense to our Gen Alpha listeners, but that would be a waste of anyone's ad budget. So when you want to reach the right professionals, you can use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals and 130 million decision makers according to their data. That's where it stands apart from other ad buys. You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority, skills, company revenue. All so you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience. That's why LinkedIn Ads boasts one of the highest B2B return on ad spend of all online ad networks. Seriously, all of them. Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com Scott that's LinkedIn.com Scott. Terms and conditions apply. Zootopia 2 has come home to Disney Plus. Let's go get ready for a new case.

[Scott Galloway]

We're gonna crack this case and prove we're the greatest partners of all time. New friends you are Gary Destiny and your last name the Snake Dream Team. Habitats Zootopia has a secret reptile population.

[Host/Interviewer]

You can watch the record breaking phenomenon at home. You're clearly working it. Zootopia 2 now available on Disney. Rated PG.

[Scott Galloway]

Tomorrow morning is knocking. Stock your fridge now. How about a creamy mocha Frappuccino drink? Or a sweet vanilla smooth caramel maybe? Or a white chocolate mocha? Whichever you choose, delicious coffee awaits. Find Starbucks Frappuccino drinks wherever you buy your groceries.

[Host/Interviewer]

Welcome back. Question number three comes from Skinny Skeptic. On Reddit, you said that every person should be in a city, but have also said that larger cities, including New York, are tough for those who aren't wealthy. How do you square the ROI of city living with the real cost of living associated with that? Given the odds of being a baller in the top 10%, 9,100 people who take that advice will struggle. Thanks. Fair question. So that's why you want to get to a city when you're young. When I moved to New York out of ucla, I lived with a friend from ucla, a guy named Monte Yortt, who is this all American water polar player who just emailed me and I haven't gotten back to him. Monty, if you're out there, I'm going to follow up and we'll get together in New York. I'm sorry? Yeah, in New York when I get back there, we rented a one bedroom and there were three of us in there and it was $1,900. I slept in the living room. I think Monty had a bedroom and the other person slept in what was the entryway. You can do that when you're young. And then after work we would all pull our vouchers our car vouchers and our per diem. If you worked past 8 or 9pm you got a $25 per diem. So there'd be four of us, we had 100 bucks and four cars or vouchers for cabs or cars and we'd go out and have fun. And I just didn't spend a lot of money. And you can dance between the rain jobs when you're really young. Now having said that, it's gotten much harder in big cities because of inflation. I think it goes to structural policy. I think we need to lower taxes on ear, especially lower earners, less than say a quarter of a million dollars. We could do that by just enforcing our tax code, the tax cap, $750 billion and having an alternative minimum tax on corporations and the wealthy. But that's another talk show. And also tax credits for more building, more housing. Anyway, I'm not going to get it anyway. I recognize it's gotten harder, but it's never going to be less hard than when you're young. Because where cities become almost impossible or impractical is when in 2010 when I had or 2011 when I had a newborn and a three year old and was living in faculty housing at NYU making $160,000 a year, I just couldn't afford to be in New York. I just couldn't do it. And so we moved to Florida. Now having said that though being in New York from 2000 to 2011 was incredibly productive for me. I made a lot of progress, established I'd like to think a lot of credibility teaching at NYU. Started my company L2 which ultimately I went on to sell for about $160 million. But and then I did an arbitrage. I moved to Florida where we rented a house on the water on the Intracoastal for $4,500. And my kids school went from being 58,000 a year to 12,000 or something. Anyways, my point is it is hard, it is expensive and it is doable, typically when you're younger and it is not doable when you get older and start collecting dogs and kids unless you're making a shit ton of money. So I acknowledge that it's very expensive, but I think it's a great training. I think it's hard, I think it's difficult, I think it's motivating. But generally speaking, even if you decide to leave, which most people do ultimately decide to leave, big cities that are expensive, usually when they have kids, I think it's a good training. I think from a lifestyle and a life experience. It's a fantastic experience. The density of ideas, capital, creativity and culture. You know, ideas need to have sex and you're just going to bump off more ideas and more opportunity in a city. In sum, I feel you it's not an option for 90% of people, but it probably is an option for about half of young people. There's a lot of service workers. You can make good money as a waiter in New York. Can you live in a fat apartment in Soho? No, you probably have to take a train out to Gowanus or Queens. But there are people who do it every day. I think the number of people who live in Manhattan is actually 2 or 3 million, but during the day it's 8 million because people come in to service all the wealth. In sum, I stand by it. If you're an economic animal, 2/3 of economic growth is going to happen in one of 20 cities. Get to the city. Do it while you're young because to your point, it gets increasingly hard and sometimes just not doable as you get older. Thanks for the question. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to office hourspropertymedia.com that's officehoursoropertymedia.com or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we we might feature it in an upcoming episode. This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Laura Gennar. Cami Rica is our social producer, Brad Williams is our editor and Drew Burrows is our Technical Director. Thank you for listening to the Prophecy pod from propag Media. Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same Premium Wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have

[Listener/Caller]

one of your assistant's assistants switch you

[Host/Interviewer]

to Mint Mobile today.

[Listener/Caller]

I'm told it's super easy to [e-mail]

[Scott Galloway]

Switch upfront payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees, extra fee full [e-mail].