
Loading summary
Adobe Voice
Support for the show comes from Adobe Express. These days there are a million different ways to reach your customers, but that can also mean a million different pieces of content. It can be overwhelming. Adobe Express can help with templates, brand kits, and generative AI that's safe for business. Your team can create its own content and will always be polished and professional. When everyone can create content themselves, it's easier to get on brand content out in the world faster. Go from cookie cutter to class of its own. Switch to the quick and easy app to create on brand content. Adobe Adobe Express. Learn more@adobe.com Express Business True story I have used Adobe Express and I was shocked how easy it is to use and produce content.
Scott Galloway
Welcome to Office Hours with Prof. G. This is the part of the show where we answer your questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship and whatever else is on your mind. What's happening today? We're continuing our special series Proph G on Marketing where we answer your marketing questions. And just a reminder, Office Hours now drops every Monday and Friday, twice a week, twice the Prof. G. So if you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording to office hours@profgmedia.com Again, that's office hoursprophgmedia.com or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we just might feature it in our next episode. That's right. You're welcome. All right, first Question Our first question comes from Boxer the Horse on Reddit. They ask, is advertising on Meta platforms worthwhile considering Meta openly admits using AI bots for engagement? Are most of the people clicking on my ads even real? Furthermore, isn't that click fraud when I might be paying for bots to engage with my paid advertising? I appreciate your insights. I think Meta is a cancer. I think that essentially when you have six and a half percent of American teens are addicted to drugs or alcohol and 24% are addicted to social media, we have a problem. And whether it was Shel Sandberg saying we need to do better, or Mark Zuckerberg saying that he'd heard or read studies that social media was actually good on the psychological well being of young people, they have lied to the American public over and over and over. There's really few people who've done more damage to global youth than Mark Zuckerberg or Shel Sandberg while making more money. I used to own the stock. It's an amazing stock. He's a brilliant businessman. I think the stock has probably quadrupled since I sold it, but I'M not strongly ethical about my financial positions. Strongly ethical, judgmental, whatever the term is. I just want to make money, so I'll buy stocks. I think they're going up, but I had trouble holding onto this stock so I sold it. See above. Missed out on probably 2 or 300% gains. He's an absolutely brilliant businessman. Back to your question. Oh yeah, it's so worth it. And the notion that there's some click fraud and some waste. What percentage of people who see your ad on television are technically fraud in the sense that they have absolutely no interest in your product? You have what is probably, and I hate to say it, the most efficient marketing vehicle in the world is probably the ad stack and the ad tech brought to you by Meta. If you think about AI, we tend to think of it through valuation or how it's consumer facing, chatgpt, anthropic. And then we think about the background, the infrastructure, Nvidia. You could argue that potentially the biggest winner from AI is Meta. They're the second largest purchaser of Nvidia chips behind Microsoft and they have think it's 1.7 million 1.7 trillion tokens. That's basically Latin for who has the most information to feed into and feed the LLMs, to give you a sense Reddit, where we get a lot of these questions, has 1.3 trillion tokens. So they have the most information and the second most processing power. And how are they using it? Are they. Is it llama their consumer facing AI LLM? No, the way they're making money is that they can figure out how to target you at exactly the right time with the right offer. And they're also talking about going upstream and doing some of the creative work and also producing commercials that can on the fly automatically transition to a young couple. If you just had a baby driving their Toyota Sequoia or a Toyota Camry. If they sense you're 70 and are looking for just an economical car and don't care about having any sort of game. See above Camry. So they are moving upstream into creative and into media buying and can, you know, create sort of real time, on demand creative. So yeah, does it work? Absolutely. And the notion that it's fraud, just think of it as leakage or waste. But there's a reason why this is one of the fastest growing media companies, if not the fastest media growing company in history. What do you do? You just set up, you kind of decide what is it you want? Do you want to create awareness? Do you want to create traffic to Your website. Do you want to inspire foot traffic into a car dealership and you set up hard metrics and then you do a bunch of different tasks and there's even AI media and tracking models and you figure out which platform is working for you. Now there is a cumulative test. I find that most successful marketers don't isolate their media spend to any one medium. That when you see ads or offers across different mediums it creates more of a loyalty effect or a cumulative effect or a whole is greater than some of its parts. But if you're just a small business just starting out, I say all right, try and get some awareness. Try and build some awareness with just content marketing. Create your own content, your own Instagram on social and then try and monetize it with direct response advertising. Buying some Google keywords, buying some ads on meta. But set up really strong metrics and hold yourself accountable or the people accountable who are spending your precious dollars on what's working and what isn't. In sum, yeah, the reason why this company is one of the most valuable companies in the world and Mark Zuckerberg is I think the fourth wealthiest person world right now is because yeah this, the bottom line is this shit works. And when I say shit, see above, I mean meta. Our second question comes from Bruin AGI on Reddit they say what books and material do you recommend if you don't have time or money to get another degree outside of marketing? Well, it kind of depends what you're interested in, boss. Well first off I would read the four or five most important or type in into AI four or five most seminal books on history like Lessons from History or Guns, Germs and Steel. Just like four or five basics to get rooted in history because I think that gives you a sense for which is funny because in college I didn't take a lot of history and I wish I had. I would think about doing a couple courses online and there's just, you know, whether it's Khan Academy or I think masterclass is not really what I call college, I think it's more entertainment. But there are a lot of courses now you can take for free that anyone from Harvard to Berkeley offers and just be curious. And then also I do think some of the online courses that test you such that you hold yourself accountable to learning certain things. The reason why there's you could probably string together a reasonable facsimile of an MBA from Wharton or tuck like a really high priced elite MBA using just what's free online if you're into finance. You want to go to Demoterin's blog, I said on valuation. Anyway Aswatomoto and read his posts every day and start just getting up to speed and reading a bunch of financial blogs. But I would set a base of trying to learn some history I think a basic biology and science courses. And then if you're interested in business, I think you need to understand some basics around accounting, which is sort of the language of business, and some basics around finance evaluation. But it's sort of what you're interested in and then trying to hold yourself accountable. And also there's just no getting around it. Reading a lot reading. You know when you read a book, you're sort of a mini expert when you for about five minutes after you finish the book. But I'd say the most important thing is just to stay curious. And I like deadlines. I give myself a deadline whenever I'm trying to learn something or get a certain amount of information. I was thinking about going back and actually taking another accounting course specifically. Or a distressed credit course. I'm really interested in credit. Bankruptcy huh? Amazing. Amazing. I don't have more friends, but yeah, there's a lot of great resources for learning if you want to learn a language. Duolingo Khan Academy there's just a ton of great ways to learn. But again, I think the most fun way to learn, the easiest way to learn and replace or supplant your college degree is just to read wonderful authors on subject material that gives you more of a global perspective. Thanks for the question. We'll be right back after a quick break.
Event Marketer
Fox Creative this is Advertiser Content from Adobe. As the Chief Marketing Officer for a tech company, I lead a team that makes fresh content on a daily basis. But this month has been particularly nuts because we're planning a conference. There are dozens of people working together on all the documents, slides, posters, flyers and merchandise. Fortunately, our event marketer is the best in the business and she said 2.
Adobe User
Adobe Express Adobe Express has been a lifesaver. Brand kits have kept everything consistent. Templates mean whatever content we need to create looks slick and professional from the start. And easy syncing of assets means that anytime a change comes in, like a last minute swap out of our new app logo, I know that every team member will instantly have access to the latest version. That way I know when the curtain.
Event Marketer
Goes up, isn't that new logo gorgeous?
Adobe User
Everything will go off without a hitch.
Event Marketer
Adobe Express the quick and easy app to create on brand content. Learn more@adobe.com Express Business.
Scott Galloway
Welcome back on our final question from DDXV professor, what's the difference between how the political right and the political left market podcasts? As a kid, my mom drove us around a lot and she always listened to the far right and radio shows, despite being an old hippie. She said it was more engaging. And I frankly have to agree. Lately, since the election, I started listening to a few right shows and noticed the differences. Let's take Steve Bannon's war room. It's four hours a day. Wow. And comes out as four separate podcasts each day. His cold opens are playing unedited liberal talking points, sometimes for up to five or ten minutes is quite bold. I can't imagine a left podcast getting away with that. Then I listen to my liberal favorites like Ezra Klein, and it's much calmer, deeply focused discussions, no random interrupts or choosing music. Much less of an ad for pillows. Anyways, I'd love to know what you think about the marketing differences between the right and left podcasts. That's a super interesting question. So first off, I think on the left we need to acknowledge that the majority of the people controlling media up until the 80s and 90s were college educated urban professionals who skew more progressive. And as a result, there was a huge swath of America, maybe even half of America, that felt that they were been ignored and that no one was really speaking to them. And then the rise of AM radio and podcasts basically filled that void. And the real juggernaut, or the tanker to fill that void was Fox. They realized, okay, this liberal sappy virtue signaling kind of corporate elitist bullshit of Democrats who pretend to give a fuck once they already have their own money. People were sick of it and they just drove a freight train through this, through this opening. And podcasts have kind of done the same now where things really came off the track, and this is true of the left and the right, is that back in the 70s and the 80s, what you had was ABC, NBC and CBS would print money running jiffy ads on the Partridge Family, which was genius. 70 or 80% of America was tuning into the same three channels for five hours a day. And they were just printing money. And as a public service, they would take a small amount of their profits and they do this really boring shitty show called the News, the Evening News. And then on the Evening news they started this two or three minute segment called with a member, Senator Jim Tunney and Bruce Hershensen, called Point Counterpoint. And what they found is that was the most engaging and entertaining part of the show. Where they pit two people with different political views against each other and it would get personal. It was kind of fun to watch these two grown men treat each other like fucking children. Or act like children, I should say. And then they decided, okay, that's it. And Murdoch recognized this isn't news, it's entertainment. And the problem with news is it's really boring and not that entertaining because have to fact check it, be more thoughtful, slow down, use your critical thinking, look at sort of, you know, angles of truth, that there is a truth, if you will, trying to pursue it. They realized that news could be entertainment. And the way you entertain people was to find people who already agreed. They didn't want illumination, they wanted support, they wanted validation. Or they wanted to cement their existing views. And also filling it up all day long with 24 hour news required a lot of quote unquote entertainment. What you have is novelty is just more interesting. And Democrats like to appeal to their college educated brethren and they want a virtue signal and clutch their pearls and just be indignant and just be indignant and a little bit more thoughtful and slow things down, which is okay. And then Sean Hannity comes on and starts spreading conspiracy theory that I don't know, Joe Biden is a woman. If the left were more entertaining, all they would be talking about is the fact that Melania Trump fucking hates her husband and, and spent. I mean, effectively, they're divorced. I think she likes going to fashion shows and being invited to everything. And her grift, her mini grift, her not so successful grift. The Melania coin. It would just be if the left were the right in podcasting, they would just be covering nonstop how much Melania hates Donald Trump. But they do a better job of leveraging the medium of catering to an audience that is more conspiratorial, more interested in stories, more interested in support than illumination. The left goes wonky, the left goes deeper, which is more appropriate, more fact checking, but quite frankly, it's just not as entertaining. So what do we have? We have gone from that three minutes of point counterpoint to 24 by seven. And news is no longer news, it's entertainment anyways. They do a better job on the right than we do on the left. They're servicing a community that quite frankly has been underserved traditionally and they're not afraid to stretch the old what's that thing? That old T thing, the old true thing. Thanks for your question. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehoursovtomedia.com Again, that's officehoursovtomedia.Com or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on the ScottGalloway subreddit and we just might feature it in an upcoming episode. Foreign.
Adobe Voice
Comes from Adobe Express With Adobe Express, you don't need a degree in graphic design to create polished and professional content. You just need to know your products and know your customers. Adobe Express will take care of the rest. They've already helped teams at major corporations around the world create the content they need quickly, easily and at scale. Now that you've heard how Adobe Express can help businesses with all their content needs, it's time to go try it out for yourself. Go from flying solo to full support. Switch to the quick and easy app to create on brand content Adobe Express. Learn more@adobe.com Express Business True story. I have used the product and was genuinely impressed with how easy it is to create on brand elegant content and then push it out really easily.
Podcast Summary: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
Episode Title: Are Meta Ads a Scam? Marketing Without a Degree, and What Right-Wing Podcasts Get Right
Release Date: June 27, 2025
In this insightful episode of The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway, Scott delves into three pressing topics: the efficacy of Meta (formerly Facebook) advertising amidst concerns of AI-driven bot engagement, strategies for acquiring marketing expertise without formal education, and the contrasting marketing approaches of right-wing versus left-wing podcasts. Below is a comprehensive summary capturing the key discussions, insights, and conclusions from the episode.
Timestamp: [00:50]
Question Posed:
Boxer the Horse from Reddit inquires about the value of advertising on Meta platforms, given Meta's admission of using AI bots for engagement. The concern centers around the legitimacy of ad clicks and the potential for click fraud.
Scott's Analysis:
Scott doesn't mince words, labeling Meta as a "cancer" due to its detrimental impact on youth, citing statistics like "24% [of American teens are addicted to social media]" ([00:50]). However, he shifts focus to the effectiveness of Meta's advertising infrastructure. According to Scott, despite the prevalence of bots, Meta remains one of the most efficient marketing vehicles available:
AI and Data Powerhouse: Scott highlights Meta's massive data resources, stating, "They have the most information and the second most processing power" ([03:10]).
Advanced Targeting: Meta’s ability to deliver precisely targeted ads is unparalleled. Scott explains, "They can figure out how to target you at exactly the right time with the right offer" ([04:20]).
Creative Integration: Meta is advancing into creative work and media buying, enabling real-time, on-demand ad content tailored to specific demographics ([05:45]).
Market Dominance: Despite ethical concerns, Scott concedes that Meta's advertising effectiveness is a significant factor in its valuation and ongoing growth, asserting, "The bottom line is this shit works" ([07:15]).
Conclusion:
While acknowledging the ethical and societal issues surrounding Meta, Scott recognizes the platform's undeniable prowess in targeted advertising. For marketers, Meta remains a potent tool, provided they implement robust metrics to track and optimize their ad spend.
Timestamp: [09:25]
Question Posed:
Bruin AGI from Reddit seeks recommendations for books and materials to learn marketing without investing time or money in another formal degree.
Scott's Recommendations:
Scott emphasizes self-directed learning and leveraging freely available resources to build a solid foundation in marketing:
Foundational Reading: He advises starting with seminal works in history and other disciplines to develop a broad perspective. "I would read the four or five most seminal books on history like Lessons from History or Guns, Germs, and Steel" ([09:30]).
Online Courses: Platforms like Khan Academy and free courses from prestigious universities (Harvard, Berkeley) are excellent for structured learning. "There are a lot of courses now you can take for free that anyone can access" ([10:05]).
Practical Application: Engaging with blogs and real-time analysis helps in understanding current market trends. Scott mentions reading Demoterin's blog on valuation and other financial blogs ([11:00]).
Accountability and Discipline: Setting deadlines and holding oneself accountable is crucial. "I give myself a deadline whenever I'm trying to learn something or get a certain amount of information" ([12:30]).
Diverse Learning: Incorporating courses in biology, science, accounting, and finance to build a well-rounded knowledge base. "I think you need to understand some basics around accounting, which is sort of the language of business, and some basics around finance evaluation" ([13:15]).
Conclusion:
Scott underscores the importance of curiosity and consistent effort in self-education. By strategically selecting resources and maintaining discipline, individuals can effectively acquire marketing expertise without formal degrees.
Timestamp: [10:10]
Question Posed:
Professor DDXV poses a question about the differing marketing strategies between political right and left podcasts. Observing that far-right shows like Steve Bannon's War Room maintain high engagement through provocative content, while left-leaning podcasts like Ezra Klein's are more subdued, Scott seeks insights into these contrasting approaches.
Scott's Analysis:
Scott provides a historical and strategic perspective on the divergent marketing tactics:
Historical Media Control: Up until the '80s and '90s, media was dominated by college-educated urban professionals with progressive leanings. This shaped the initial landscape of media messaging ([10:30]).
Fox's Strategic Shift: Recognizing the disconnect with a large portion of America feeling unheard, Fox capitalized on sensationalism. "They realized that news could be entertainment" ([11:45]).
Entertainment Over Information: The right-wing podcasts often prioritize entertainment, using aggressive and confrontational tactics to engage listeners. Examples include lengthy, provocative segments that challenge opposing views, creating a more dynamic and entertaining format ([12:10]).
Left's Approach: Conversely, left-leaning podcasts tend to focus on in-depth, thoughtful discussions with an emphasis on factual accuracy and critical thinking. While intellectually stimulating, Scott suggests they may lack the sensationalism that drives higher engagement ([14:00]).
Community Servicing: The right leverages catering to an underserved audience, offering validation and support that resonate deeply with their listeners. "They're servicing a community that quite frankly has been underserved traditionally" ([15:00]).
Entertainment as Strategy: The right's willingness to sensationalize and entertain has allowed their podcasts to flourish in terms of audience engagement, whereas the left's approach, though valuable, doesn't capture the same level of entertainment-driven listenership ([16:20]).
Conclusion:
Scott posits that the right-wing's focus on entertainment and aggressive marketing tactics has yielded greater engagement in the podcasting space compared to the left. By tapping into the need for validation and community support, right-wing podcasts effectively leverage media to build a loyal and active listener base.
Throughout the episode, Scott Galloway offers a candid and incisive look into the mechanics of modern marketing and media. From dissecting the complexities and ethical quandaries of Meta's advertising strategies to providing actionable advice for self-education in marketing, and analyzing the nuanced differences in political podcast marketing, Scott delivers a wealth of knowledge grounded in real-world observations and strategic thinking.
For listeners seeking to understand the interplay between technology, marketing efficiency, and media influence, this episode provides valuable perspectives and practical guidance.
Notable Quotes:
"The bottom line is this shit works." – Scott Galloway on Meta's advertising effectiveness ([07:15]).
"I give myself a deadline whenever I'm trying to learn something or get a certain amount of information." – Scott Galloway on self-education strategies ([12:30]).
"They're servicing a community that quite frankly has been underserved traditionally." – Scott Galloway on right-wing podcast marketing ([15:00]).
Engage with Prof. G Pod:
To submit your questions for future episodes, email officehours@profgmedia.com or post on the Scott Galloway subreddit.
This summary is intended for informational purposes and reflects the discussions from the specified episode of The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway. For the full experience, listening to the episode is recommended.