
Loading summary
Ed Elson
Hey there, Ryan Reynolds here. It's a new year and you know what that means.
Alex Rinker
No, not the diet resolutions. A way for us all to try and do a little bit better than we did last year.
Ed Elson
And my resolution, unlike big wireless, is to not be a raging and raise the price of wireless on you every chance I get. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch $45 upfront.
Alex Rinker
Payment required equivalent to $15 per month. New customers on first 3 month plan only. Taxes and fees, extra Speed slower above 40 GB on unlimited. See mintmobile.com for details.
Vivian Tu
This isn't your grandpa's finance podcast. It's Vivian Tu, your rich BFF and host of the Net Worth and Chill podcast. This is money talk that's actually fun, actually relatable, and will actually make you money. I'm breaking down investments, side hustles and wealth strategies. No boring spreadsheets, just real talk that'll have you leveling up your financial game with amazing guests like Glenda Baker.
Alex Rinker
There's never been any house that I've sold in the last 32 years that's not worth more today than it was.
Vivian Tu
The day that I sold it. This is a money podcast that you'll actually want to listen to. Follow Net Worth and chill wherever you listen to podcasts, your bank account will thank you later.
Ed Elson
Scott why are there so few unicorns in Europe?
Vivian Tu
Oh wow, we're going to need a bigger boat. I get asked that a lot here. One it starts with immigrants and that is the example I use when I'm asked out in London is that my father in Glasgow and my mother in London in their, you know, like when they were 19 and 23 left and took a chance to come to America. So risk taking a crazy idea that willing to kind of give up a good career or great prospects and take a chance on a crazy idea that might become crazy genius. We just have more of that secret sauce than anyone in the world. We have the best universities in the world. I've said often that you can't find a $50 billion plus company in tech that isn't a bike ride from a world class engineering university. And we have most of them. You have more kind of hardball, full body contact competition where the government opts for a lack of regulation and capitalism overregulation. We have a much more risk, much greater risk appetite. There's $5 million in venture capital for every one startup in the United States and there's 1 million for every startup in Europe. And there's five times as many entrepreneurs per capita in the United States. So we're more risk aggressive, we have stronger ip, we have more capital, and it just kind of all adds up to what is an ecosystem where there's been more wealth created in the last 24 months in a 7 mile radius of SFO International because of AI than in the last 10 years in Europe. These are big, big issues baked into the DNA of America. And I don't, quite frankly, I don't see anything really changing in the short or the medium term.
Ed Elson
Welcome to first Time Founders. I'm Ed Elson. The European startup scene is struggling. Last year Europe produced only seven new unicorns. Meanwhile, America made 71. My next guest, however, is a rare success story. Born and raised in Germany, he is one of the few Europeans who is leading the world in software and technology. His company, valued at $13 billion, is the second most valuable startup in Europe. What does the company do? Something called process mining. And we'll get to what that actually is in a moment. This is my conversation with Alex Rinker, co founder and co CEO of Celonis. Welcome Alex. Thank you for joining me.
Alex Rinker
Thanks for having me.
Ed Elson
You came in from New York, right? You're around.
Alex Rinker
Came on the subway.
Ed Elson
On the subway, exactly. So we got a lot to get into. But I want to just start off with what Celonis actually is and what it does. So Celonis is a process mining company. And what does that mean exactly? So basically, big companies hire you to do an X ray essentially of all of their business processes. You know, it could be manufacturing processes or compliance processes, or financial reporting processes, et cetera. Any process that has multiple moving parts. You come in, you visualize the process, you do that with data and you identify all of the inefficiencies in that process. Have I gotten anything wrong?
Alex Rinker
Yeah, I think that's where we started. Right. And we've built a lot more around it. We call it a process intelligence platform. So it doesn't just mine the process, it gives you real time insights in it. It flags when things are going wrong, it helps you orchestrate and optimize processes. But you captured the essence of it 100%.
Ed Elson
And it turns out that this is process mining or process intelligence, a highly valuable business. So you've worked with more than a third of the Fortune Global 500. You have unlocked more than $5 billion in value for your, and your company is now worth, or at least at its latest valuation, $13 billion, which makes it the second most valuable company in Europe. So my first question to you, what drew you to processes and process mining. And how did you know that this was going to be such a big business opportunity?
Alex Rinker
So when we started, we really. It started we got fascinated by the technology. We were all students at university and we didn't know much about business processes. In some ways, when I look back, I'm happy how little we knew because we were quite naive. But one thing we did know. So first we got fascinated with the technology and then we talked to some prospective clients and some. The university had these businesses that you could cooperate with, and there was all sorts of programs at the university to work with businesses. And we very quickly found out that processes are one of the most horizontal opportunities. They really are the fabric that run every business. The way you sell, I mean, the way you produce this podcast as a process, everything a business does can be described and expressed as a process. So when we look at a company, whether it's a bank or an automotive company, or packaged consumer goods, we look at it as a collection of interwoven and enacting processes.
Ed Elson
I guess what I'd love to know a bit more about from you is why companies have such a hard time with their processes. Like, how is it that a company can get to a point where they. They don't even understand their own business or how their own business works and they need to hire someone like you to come in and tell them this is how your business works. Like, how does a company get to that point?
Alex Rinker
So I have two stories about this. One is the story how it happened, and then the story how we found out about it. So the first is the story how it happened is very simple. So my grandfather, you know, he was a farmer and he grew up as a farmer and then he had a potato trading business. He just passed away at 96 years old. So, you know, he got pretty old. So back in the day, you could see the whole process, right? You would go there, you could see potatoes coming in, trucks coming in, everything being sorted. It's going out, you know, and if there was an issue, you could see it and quickly fix it. But then obviously companies grew much, much bigger than that. And you had ERP systems. People said, hey, we want to digitize our processes in ERP systems. In many ways, these ERP systems, our processes had to fit these systems. So we had to fit our processes into these systems, which generated quite a bit of friction. And then you had more and more systems come along. So it doesn't just stay with the ERP system like SAP and Oracle. You had CIM coming along you had the cloud revolution, so you had CIM systems coming along and then you had a lot of cloud applications, hr, it, service management. So over time we added more and more systems. This really happened in the last 50 years. So from the 70s, 80s all the way to today, and now companies have an ERP system. And I think on average big Companies own over 250 core systems that operate the different parts of their business. Supply chain, hr, finance, inventory, warehouse management, all sorts of processes. Banks, I mean when I talk to our big banking clients, they have thousands, they're even more complex. And in many ways our processes had to sort of be stitched together across all these systems. And then you have changing products, you have globalization, you have acquisitions. So over time these businesses tend to get quite complex and you can't see the process anymore because it's in systems. Not like with my grandfather, we could see it. And in many ways we also had to change our organizations, our processes to accommodate the way these systems were set up. So companies have a huge opportunity. We say that every process out there is waiting to be optimized. And now with AI coming in, you're going to have a huge wave of what we call process re engineering because you want to reimagine your processes in the age of AI. And we can talk about how we think it's going to play out and how we see it playing out. The story of how we found out about it is also quite interesting. So when we started we actually thought the same as you. We thought, well, process mining is kind of an interesting technology, but that's a little bit boring. We were excited about processes, but we said, well, but if we could simulate processes, so if we could basically take the mining and then build simulation models where people then could say, hey, if I hire like five people here or if I automate this, you know, how does it change? And we built a simulation product that was based on process mining. We took that to market. It didn't work because it was way ahead of its time. So we were about ready to give up until someone said, we explained how our technology works. And they said, well, this process visibility part, that's really interesting, that's where I would like to start. And even though we do way more today, it's like we really found out and there was a home run that people need that X ray of understanding exactly how their processes operate.
Ed Elson
What's like the worst process you've ever seen? Like you go to a client and you look at how they do anything, whatever it is, and you're like, oh my God. This is the slowest, most inefficient, most ridiculous process I've ever seen. You don't have to name them by name.
Alex Rinker
But often very successful companies, it's very high margin, actually don't have very efficient processes. Right. So you have that. I mean, we've seen crazy stories. One of our clients found out that they paid hundreds of millions worth of invoices twice. Okay. By the way, a lot of clients do that. Usually it's more in the millions to tens of millions, what you can save. But one was in the hundreds. It happens in every company. If you don't have a system, you get an invoice, someone gets a copy, maybe it gets into the system with slightly different data. You are from the uk, so the date format is different than the us so people type it the wrong way and somebody gets in the system twice. System thinks it's two invoices get paid twice. So that's just one example of a process that's ridiculous, but it happens. We see a lot of friction or where companies really pay attention is friction in customer facing processes. Like if it takes you days to book an order. We had one client once that was in a complex business, to be fair, but they on average changed the date that they confirmed to the customer 13 times.
Ed Elson
Wow.
Alex Rinker
So imagine that, right? I mean they were very successful companies. So their products were so unique that customers would put up with it. We helped them fix it. But you know, imagine on Amazon you get on average 13 emails. It's like, no, we're not coming on Monday, we're coming Tuesday. You sometimes get those emails but you don't get them 13 times on average. You know, we have lots of customers that shipped products but never invoiced them. Right. So they had revenue leakage because they ship products that they never invoiced. We have lots of customers that have, that negotiate contracts with their suppliers, but then they actually don't take advantage of them. So they buy off of prices that are actually higher than what they negotiated. So there's like, it's a really exciting space because you can see the impact. And what's particularly exciting, we do projects with Northwestern Medicine. They are looking at as patients go through the imaging, like a mammography or other imaging techniques, how long is the wait time? How can we cut that cycle time down? How can we make sure that we get it right the first time? What do the drop off rates look like? Right. How can we release patients out of the hospital faster? How can we move them through faster. So they started within finance and procurement, but they moved into the core medical operations. We have customers, a lot of government customers. Now we're talking about government efficiency. So we saved the state of Oklahoma, for example. I helped them really, as they came in and said, we want to really understand how are we spending money and where's money, taxpayer money, going out the door. And they were able to save taxpayer dollars and get more transparency into that. So we work with increasing amount of government agency, and we're excited about how we can make sure that government takes better care of taxpayer money. So there is no shortage of opportunities.
Ed Elson
Ten years ago, this is probably the most boring concept ever, but suddenly it's very exciting to people. And I think a lot of it is because of the renewed interest in government waste and the fact that people are so upset about the idea that we don't have transparency into how our government really works. We don't know where our money goes. And now we've got Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy heading up the Department of Government Efficiency, which is like the biggest thing in the news right now when it comes to government. So you're kind of at the forefront of that. Do you think you'd ever work with doge, the Department of Government Efficiency? Is that kind of like the sort of golden use case for Salonis?
Alex Rinker
Well, we hope so. Right. And it's not just doge. DOGE is really facilitating it. It's the agencies on the federal level, the states, and it's really governments around the world that I think have a very strong interest. I mean, with high inflation, with increasing debt, I think everybody has an interest to make sure that government money is spent transparently, efficiently, the same way businesses do. I think everybody can get more efficient. It's the same way that humans always get better. And the starting points are different, for sure. But often actually the best organizations, you know, if you want to get better, if you're already good, you need the best and most sophisticated systems. Right. So it's not that I would say we work with inefficient companies. We work with everybody. And I think that everybody has an opportunity to get better.
Ed Elson
So you've seen how these processes work. You've probably seen more inefficiencies than basically anyone in the world.
Alex Rinker
Yes.
Ed Elson
So I feel like you are well positioned to take a good guess at what is inefficient in the government right now. I know you haven't done an X ray of it, but if you were to do an audit of the US Government. What would you think are the big problems that need to be streamlined right now?
Alex Rinker
Well, I think one, because you also want to drive impact quickly. So if you want to drive impact quickly, the first thing you focus on is where money goes out of the door. So you look at procurement, you look at invoicing, you look at the controls around that, all the money flows that go out of the door. How can we make them more transparent? Where do we maybe have things that we don't intend to happen, like that? Where's potential fraud happening? How can we increase the accountability of that? And that's a complex thing because on the federal level and then even on the state level, you have multiple payment systems, you have hundreds of billions going out of the door of the government every year. So I think that's where I would probably start. But then you can get into everything else. I mean, you can get into labor efficiency, you can get into the efficiency of the core processes of servicing the citizens really in every single department. So you can get into really the corporations of these agencies that provide these services. Whether it's you pick up your new driver's license or you hand in your tax return. You can imagine the kind of use cases, right? As a citizen, you can really go anywhere.
Ed Elson
We'll be right back.
Vivian Tu
Support for the show comes from Brex, the financial stack founders can bank on. Brex knows cash is king for startups, so they built a banking experience that takes every dollar further. Unlike traditional business banking solutions, Brex has no minimums and no transaction fees and you can get 20 times the standard FDIC protection. Even better, you can earn industry leading yield from your first dollar while still being able to access your funds anytime. Learn more at brex.com banking-solutions brex.com banking solutions.
Alex Rinker
Why do so many of us get happiness wrong and how can we start to get it right? I mean, I think we assume that happiness is about positive emotion on all the time, right? Often very high arousal, positive emotion. But that's not really what we're talking about. I'm Preet Bharara and this week Dr. Laurie Santos joins me on my podcast Stay Tuned with Preet to discuss the science behind happiness. We explore job crafting, the parenting paradox, the arrival fallacy, and why acts of kindness might be the simplest path to fulfillment. The episode is out now. Search and follow Stay tuned with Preet wherever you get your podcasts.
Ed Elson
We're back with first time founders. What would you say makes a good process? I think about this a lot in my work, I mean, I don't have massive payment system processes, but, you know, we write scripts and we work as a team, and we gotta figure out how we produce this podcast. And I find that there are often just processes I just don't like. Like, they just feel awkward, slow, they irritate me. But I'm never fully sure how to address that. Like, you know, sometimes I'll just be like, oh, let's have a meeting, and, like, figure out how to make this better. But then even that makes it worse because then we start nitpicking everything, and it takes like an hour to have meeting, and then it's like, it's even worse. So I guess from your perspective, what is a reliable way to make a process within an organization better?
Alex Rinker
It's a lifestyle that you have to embed. I think what, what some people think, it's like they're too on and off about it, Right? So you like, let's get in a meeting, fix this process, and then never talk about it again. Yeah, that usually doesn't work. It's more about how do you get 1% better every week? Okay. So one of the things I always tell our teams is we are really selling a lifestyle. And the lifestyle is called continuous operational improvement. How do you get better all the time? How do you find these increments? It's like these little changes that add up to really, ultimately a revolution. That's really how you have to think about it. And the one thing that really figured this out initially where the, you know, the whole culture of the Toyota quality management system, Kaizen, and optimizing manufacturing processes, because manufacturing processes is like, you need perfect quality. It's very expensive. If you screw something up, like if you have a car and you're missing one little screw, the whole production line stops. Okay, so you know, those companies invented this Kaizen lifestyle, right? And that's really not from a technology standpoint, but culturally, what we are evangelizing. And when you think about it now with AI, that is exactly what companies need. Every company needs to embrace this. I'm like 100% convinced, because the way AI is going to manifest, you're not going to have this one AI system. You're going to have lots of agents in your processes. So a company is going to have, I don't know, 100,000 employees and 100,000 agents, right? And these agents are going to automate little processes and things and tasks so that ultimately the whole organization is much more efficient. One person is going to have way, way more Impact and it's going to do way more. And in order to do this, you have to think of each of this agent as a small process change. And you're not going to do that overnight. And you're not going to do this with one big bang or one year sprint. You're going to do this by implementing this tool set, educating the organization, really promoting this as a lifestyle where people are constantly automating, constantly optimizing, constantly embedding AI into what they do. And then two, three years later, they're going to be way more efficient than before. That's how it's going to work.
Ed Elson
Are you doing that within your own company as well? Are you employing AI agents to automate the processes within Celonis itself?
Alex Rinker
We have a big Celonis for Celonis program and that's exactly how we approach it. How do we get better every day, right? Like, how do we make our customer experience better? How do we make our customer onboarding better? How do we make our customer support better? How do we really embed those process? And you know, for us it's changing because we're growing so fast and we have grown so fast that sometimes you take the eye off the ball. Even though you are, you know, the process company, you take the eye off the ball. So it's something we constantly remind ourselves and go back to.
Ed Elson
I feel like this could be an entire sector or a department. Like I feel like we're going to see like chief process officers or something, right?
Alex Rinker
We already see this, that organizations are moving from very functional organizations. Think about the process of getting a lead, converting it into an opportunity, selling your product, shipping your product, maybe manufacturing it, and then billing it is called Lead2Cash. It's a very important process. So today you have a sales development team, you have a sales team, you have an engineering team, you have a post sales team, you have deployments, you have invoicing. So it's like seven different departments or so that are involved in this. And what we see already is that people are embedding process owners. So chief process owners, call them different ways, enterprise process owners for end to end processes. So what already a lot of companies are doing is that they're moving from a very functional structure to more of a process centric structure of the organization. And AI can automate more of those process tasks. That makes a lot more sense, right?
Ed Elson
Yeah.
Alex Rinker
So that you can really look at this end to end and say, what's our customer experience end to end? Because if I sent them the wrong invoice or I provision the thing that they haven't bought. Those breakpoints really hurt the customer experience. Customer experience is an outcome of a process. It's not just your product. So we see already that companies are sort of pivoting their org charts towards more of these process centric structures.
Ed Elson
Hearing you talk about this, you sound both your accent but also your philosophy, very German. You do. You sound, I mean the attention to detail, the obsession with order, process structure, it does not feel. You're not like an American cowboy, you're like an attention to detailed German. And I want to talk about that or I'd like for you to talk about that because we've been talking about this a little bit on our podcast where in Germany there is a dearth of entrepreneurship, but that's also true of Europe in general. And I'm just going to go through a couple stats here. There are 760 unicorns in the US and there are only 130 unicorns in Europe. Salonis is the second largest of all of those. On a per capita basis, the US has 13 times more unicorns than Europe. And when we look at the US Stock market, the US Stock market is now three times larger than the European stock market. And back in 2010, it was only one and a half times larger. So the gap is growing. Why do you think Europe is struggling so much to build new successful companies such as Celonis?
Alex Rinker
I think the primary reason is the venture capital infrastructure. I think it's gotten a lot better. But the structure around risk capital in the US is absolutely phenomenal. In the US companies that have a 10% chance of working out can raise $30 million seat rounds. Think about that. People are willing to give a team that doesn't even have a product yet $30 million, and maybe it has a 1% chance of working. But there's so much capital that goes into technology and emerging companies that sort of on the whole that system works, right? Some people are more successful than others, but on a whole, that's an incredible infrastructure that doesn't exist in Europe. In Europe, you have an increasing amount of venture capital. But for example, when we started, we bootstrapped for almost six years with no funding. And part of that because there wasn't enterprise oriented venture capital infrastructure. And the few VCs that were there said, oh, early 20s, you're too young to start a B2B business. Thank you. And then we were fine bootstrapping. But that doesn't work for every company. So I think that is the primary reason. I think There are other reasons. Obviously you have a huge domestic market, so that helps. I think you have a very entrepreneurial culture, a very good culture on failure. But look, people talk about the entrepreneurial culture in the us. I mean, companies were started in Europe. BMW was started in Germany. There was an entrepreneur there that wasn't afraid of failing. And I think that the cultural differences are not the biggest deal. I think there's tremendous amount of entrepreneurial history and heritage in Europe and tremendous amount of great talent. You have a pretty strong education system. I think the top European schools are just as good as the top US schools. You can actually say that in Europe education is more affordable and more accessible for people. So I think that the infrastructure around education, the talent in Europe is actually quite phenomenal, could certainly be improved a lot. But I think that's not the primary reason. I think the primary reason is that the venture capital infrastructure is so much less developed. And for technology companies in particular, you need capital. It's a capital intensive business now with AI, it's even in some ways more capital intensive. And I think that's the biggest gap. And obviously because we didn't have that, you then have the issue that a lot of you are really behind. So for example, out of Celonis, I get calls every month from former selling out, starting a company, just actually put an angel check into one of them. And there's great companies there. Right. I don't know how many of them will work out, but that obviously these successes feed the next successes. And because we didn't have as much of that, the US gets further and further ahead. I am bullish on Europe from an entrepreneurial ecosystem because of the talent. Quality of life is very high. I think people want to live there. I think people from all over the world still a very attractive place. So I think Europe has a lot of opportunities if Europe is able to use them. I think there's a lot ahead. But I would say the capital infrastructure is the main gap.
Ed Elson
I feel like another way to say this is America's rich. The reason I bring that up is because those guys who are down to put in a $30 million check for a company that has maybe a 1 to 5% chance of success. I feel like the only guys who can do that are the mega, mega billionaires or the mega funds who can make these bets. And I'm starting to think maybe it's just we're a little too comfortable in America.
Alex Rinker
I think America's rich for sure, but Europe is actually also quite rich. So for example In Germany there's a lot of wealth, but that wealth isn't going into risk capital. So for example, if you have a pension in the us, there's a high likelihood that a portion of that goes into the top VC funds. If you ask the top VC funds who are your investors, they will say it's a pension fund.
Ed Elson
The teachers.
Alex Rinker
Yeah, exactly. The teacher's pension. Right. In Germany, that actually used to be forbidden. Pension funds couldn't invest in risk capital. Now they can, like a very small percentage. I think there's some changes, but it's a whole different scale. So actually Europe historically was, you know, I think we're falling behind more and more, but there's a lot of wealth in Europe that could be directed towards riskier asset classes that just hasn't.
Ed Elson
There are two stats about Germany's economy which I find really interesting and I think kind of illustrate your point. The first is public infrastructure spending, which is two and a half percent of gdp, which is one of the lowest rates in the world. And the second is the debt to GDP ratio, which is 60%, which is significantly lower than the rest of the G7, certainly way lower than the US. And I feel like that is a good illustration of where Germans heads are at, which is they're very afraid of spending and also very afraid of debt. And it does paint this overall economic picture of like they're just not willing to take risks. And I feel like that's sort of reflected in the VC environment where it feels like the entire setup of the German economy is like we're afraid that something might break, so we want to play it really, really safe. We're not going to go out and over leverage ourselves. And maybe we're not going to go out and make bets on young companies that might not succeed.
Alex Rinker
That's what everybody says. I don't know if I totally agree. I think, you know, when you think about the founders epoch in Europe and particularly Germany, there was a tremendous amount of risk taking. You look at Siemens, you look at BMW, you look at basf, a lot of those companies actually got started within a reasonably short time window. So it's not that the cultural heritage is totally risk avoiding. Certainly there's a different culture around risk, which is also not necessarily all bad. Some of the good US companies, they took risks, but they were also built on solid principles of entrepreneurship. So I wouldn't expect Germany to have been the leader in the early days of the crypto industry or something like that. That is certainly true. There's a more conservative mindset but if you think about deep technology, where you need to make long term bets, you need to have an engineering driven mindset, I think that Germany actually has a great heritage on that and there's a lot of risk taking. I think that the system didn't enable it. If you say, hey, we can't invest any of our pensions in a venture capital, how would you expect the venture capital industry to work? So it's like, it's not that there's like 80 something million people that are afraid to take risks. Right. I think there's a system that didn't encourage people to invest money into ventures and technology ventures. And I think that is the primary challenge. I mean, SAP was bootstrapped too. Right. And it's been a long time ago. Obviously that was a different time. Right. Venture capital wasn't the thing then. But still, I mean the, you know, that was the last German big technology company that went public and went on to be successful and there hasn't been any really big successes since.
Ed Elson
It's like SAP and then a bunch of car companies basically.
Alex Rinker
Yeah, exactly. And the car companies got started way, way earlier. So hopefully that changes. But I think the culture and attitude also a strength. I don't think that's the main reason. I think the system is to blame and these other European countries do.
Ed Elson
I want to talk about how you built this company. So you started the company in 2011. As you mentioned, you spent the first five years bootstrapping. So you did not raise any outside funding. Briefly walk us through how you bootstrapped and I'd love to know if you would do it again, given the choice.
Alex Rinker
You know, it was a pretty intense period. Like you have to be pretty hardcore. To which we had 12 and a half thousand dollars when started. You actually have to like, you know, to form a limited liability company in Germany you have to guarantee 25,000. So we had to promise another 12 and a half thousand. But you only have to put up half of it. So the other half at that time.
Ed Elson
Is that the same in America?
Alex Rinker
No, you can start with $1. They've changed the system in Germany. You can also start it with.
Ed Elson
Well, by the way, that's another great example of what we were just talking about.
Alex Rinker
Exactly. It's fair. Yeah, yeah. In the US it's like 500 bucks for the lawyers and whatever. And you've got a Delaware and go whatever you want. So you're right. So you know, we're 12 and a half thousand and you know, we literally we, you know, slept in the car we drove around in an old Opal that was my co founders and we pitched clients, right? The good thing of it was really enforced focus on the customer. Because if clients were willing, were not willing to sign up for Solonos, you know, we wouldn't have any revenue to pay employees and build the business. You know, we sent out handwritten letters to people because we figured out if they get like a regular letter, the assistant throws it away. But if they get a handwritten letter, it could be the grandmother, husband or wife or whatever. So those letters actually got opened. And when you got a letter from us, it was a great gift because you got a voucher for a free demo. How generous was that? So some people actually filled out the voucher and got a free demo from us. And we really, I think in the early days, just really focused on our customers signing up customers and then continuously building and iterating on the product to make those customers happy and grow with us. And the good news is in our business, which is focused on enterprise, you can, if you land 100 customers, that's a lot, right? And you get bigger contracts. So you can actually work in that mode. I think if you start a consumer business. So it's very hard to bootstrap that. It's been done, but it's much harder because you, you don't get these bigger contracts from your customers. And then in 2016, we decided, hey, we really want to take on the US market. It was actually a lot of European companies, when they start in Germany and they go to France and then they go to Spain and then they go to wherever UK or whatever, we said, well, if we are going international, we are going to the U.S. obviously. Then we also went into other countries in Europe, but we said the first market we're really going to take on is the US market. So we went to the US and started the business here and we figured out it might make sense to raise some venture funding to do that. So we raised venture funding partly for the funding and partly because of the network that we could get through those VCs.
Ed Elson
Yeah, I just want to go through the fundraising. So you raised 28 million in your first round in 2016. Two years later, $50 million in your Series B. A year after that, 290 million. And then later you raised a billion into your Series D. So you're kind of a prolific fundraiser at this point. Is there anything you've learned about fundraising? I mean, you've experienced both sides. I mean, you bootstrapped, you built the business and Then you went out there and you did the elevator pitch and raised a bunch of money. What are some of the learnings that you've taken away about fundraising? What makes a really good fundraiser?
Alex Rinker
One thing that's really important is to have alignment with your investors on what the journey looks like, what you want to do. Find the right investors that are really not just excited about the business opportunity, but also excited about the impact that you can create. We say we make processes work for people, for companies and for the planet. And that's a really important mission. I think I'm converting you into a process evangelist a little bit here. I hope so at least because you realize how important this is. It's patients in the hospitals, it's customer experience, it's citizens and their services. It's the work that people do every day. You get frustrated. Imagine how frustrated you would get if you were in a higher transactional environment than you.
Ed Elson
I get frustrated cooking breakfast.
Alex Rinker
Exactly. You know, you get frustrated with processes. Imagine if you had to have to run a UPS logistics hub or something like that. Right.
Ed Elson
I'll stick to talking on a microphone.
Alex Rinker
Exactly. But I think you want people excited about what you do and really bought into whatever your plan is for the future. And then I think you need to explain your story in a way that investors can digest. Right. So you need to talk to investors differently than you talk to customers. It's a different audience. Then I think you need to also make sure that you bring your customer proof points. Right. I think that investors are, first of all, they're going to call your customers. Right. So that's clear. And then you need to really make sure that you, you have alignment and set. Create the right setup. I think that's extremely important. It's not just about the money you raise. It's a lot about the setup you create that allows you to really go and be successful afterwards.
Ed Elson
We'll be right back. We're back with first time founders. I love the way you say how it's like it's a different audience. The customers are one audience, the investors are another audience. And I feel like that encapsulates well how building a company is in a lot of ways, like a performance. Like your job is to kind of put on, I mean, the handwritten letters. You're gonna put on a show for the customers and demonstrate, you know, I know what you like. You know, I know you want someone who's taken care and taken the time out of their day to write this thing. I'd be interested to know if you see being a CEO as that because we talk a lot about that on our podcast. The way, you know, you are presenting an image and you've gotta spend a lot of time thinking, you know, what kind story does the audience want to hear? Is that something you think about a lot?
Alex Rinker
I used to think about it more than I do, actually. I think that the most important thing is that you're authentic and people really feel that. So I think you need to think about the impact you want to create and the type of change you want to drive and the mission you have. And then you need to obviously communicate that in a simple way that people can understand. So you can't if you're very technical. And often people have the tendency to be too technically said, so you have to work on storytelling. But I don't think it's a performance. I think it's something that you're really passionate about and that you really believe in. And then as an actor, I don't have to necessarily believe in. If I'm a good actor, I can play any role. Right? So in a way, it's really a mission where you say, hey, I really have this belief, and I'm going to gather more and more people with me on this journey. And that's why I think it's so exciting about Celonis. For customers that really embed Celonis into their operations, they get so much better. I talked about some of those examples, and they embrace this as a lifestyle. They suddenly don't just think about their P and L statement. They think about their process, health, and how they can optimize their processes. How do these outcomes affect customers? How do these outcomes affect financial outcomes? How do these outcomes affect our employees? So it's a. We are changing the way companies run and operate. And I think that the, you know, when you attract people, I mean, a lot a big part of a CEO's recruiting, right, you want to attract people that are aligned with that. You know, you want to attract missionaries, not mercenaries. Okay. You want to attract people that are going to wake up in the morning and be passionate about this. Right. So in a way, you evangelize. And I think as a startup founder, you're always evangelizing, you're always communicating and expanding. But you need to do it. Not to put on a show, but because of what's in your heart, what you really believe, and what gets you excited. You also don't do it from a purely financial perspective, of course. Financial so important. And it's important to make all your stakeholders Successful, your investors, your employees, et cetera. But that's not enough. Right. You need to have a bigger mission that you really believe. And I think that otherwise you're just not going to persevere. It's very hard to start a company and to be successful. Out of a thousand companies that start, maybe one is successful. I don't know the exact numbers, but it's not a lot. And I think it's not because the thousands were bad ideas. There's probably a few hundred bad ideas, but there's also a few hundred good ones. But it's the perseverance you have really sticking with it and waking up every day and doing it. And I think that starts with passion and belief.
Ed Elson
Yeah, it's basically like who can last the longest at a certain point. I feel like if you're only in it for the money, it's just so much harder to wake up every morning and try really hard. Maybe for some people, that is just so motivating that it's possible 100%.
Alex Rinker
And I think also if that passion and impact is missing, I think people reflect too much about themselves. Right.
Ed Elson
I'm going to get caught.
Alex Rinker
Yeah. I'm going to do this or that. I'm going to be on the newspaper, whatever. I think that's usually not the right motivation. Right. So I think. And again, it's hard to be authentic if you don't believe something. People will find out. So I think that this vision orientation is very important. When you start a company, you went.
Ed Elson
From three employees to now 3,000 employees. You've gone through the whole scaling process. How did your management style change as the company grew?
Alex Rinker
I think that's one of the biggest challenges for founders. You have to basically change yourself completely at least three times. So when you start, you basically, you are in like block and tackling mode. You know, you know every detail. You know, you have to have extreme attention to detail. You probably can't afford very experienced people, but you also have a lot of control. Right. And then you have to become a manager. Right. So you have to manage people. You have to put a team together. You have to think about an org chart. You have to. And that's definitely a transformation. And then at some point, you have to move from being a leader to being a leader of leaders, and then ultimately to being an executive. And what that means is that you have to abstract from the details. You have to find a few very simple things you're going to focus on. Like, you can't lead an organization of 3,000 people. With details, right? Like we, in every year we have three priorities or something that maybe fall, right? So. So it's very, very simple. You need to communicate a lot. Again, from a standpoint of authenticity. But you have to communicate a lot. And you have to really create a team that is aligned with where you want to go. And then that team executes and they lead their leaders. And you have to really make sure that you empower an organization that you are not just trying to manage every detail. Certainly there's some CEOs that handle it differently, but certainly if you have a company that's complex, I think if you have very few products, you might be able to go into a lot of detail. But if you have a complex platform and you want to get broader and broader, you need to create a culture where people are empowered, where people can make their own decisions, where people can go fast. And I think that is another transformation. So you have to really change yourself quite a bit, I think, in that journey. And I think that's where a lot of founders actually fail.
Ed Elson
I think that's where I fail in terms of management is just delegating to people. I find it really hard to do. How did you manage that? Especially when you're just starting out, like, what was the point where you're like, okay, I'm gonna trust this gigantic process. Even as the guy who obsesses over processes, I'm just gonna give this to this person and I'm gonna delegate. And I trust them to get it done.
Alex Rinker
Well, at some point it gets so much that you have to learn. You know, the thing is, I think this transformation, like, if you can't delegate, you're not gonna get very far, right? You need to delegate. The thing is, when you make this change from a leader to a leader of leaders, an executive, it's a little different. Before you can run around the office and you have a microphone like this one, and you say something in the microphone and it happens because everybody knows you have 300 people. Everybody knows you people are still close. And there's a founder. You say, hey, we should build this product or we should do this. And somehow it happens. So I called the founder. Microphone company gets bigger. You have more locations, more people, more senior people. You're like, test, test. You know, this thing doesn't work anymore. So then you have to think about org chart structures, leaders of leaders, you know, how to inspire people around simple priorities. And then you have to elevate yourself and just say those details. I'm going to let my team handle that I'm not going to get involved. You know, we have to have a failure culture. If people screw up, that's fine, right? Obviously not too badly pleased. But you know, and I think there's some founders, they read these stories from Elon Musk and Steve Jobs and you know how they basically have Steve Jobs like debugs a button on an iPhone or something like that. And I think when I talk to founders, I always say be careful with that. Right? Because first of all, likely you're not Steve Jobs. I mean he was like a once in a generation type of genius. And then secondly, Apple, he was so good at product management and design and so visionary that he could create the most valuable company in the world or one of the most valuable company in the world with basically like a handful of products. Right. You think about the ratio of like products to market cap for Apple is extremely, very, very low. So most companies don't work that way. Right? So if you compare Steve Jobs management style to Jeff Bezos, I mean, Jeff Bezos, Amazon is like, he's a systems thinker, right? He says I don't actually work very hard. Like he's basically, I work from 9 to 5, you know. But he created systems and people and accountable structures that were so good that people could make their own decision and Amazon could be in all these businesses. So it's a very different model of a company that has a very different needs, a very different leadership style. So if some founders, they run around like mini Steve Jobs and sometimes I'm a little bit, I'm like, be careful, that works for Steve Jobs. Because you were Steve Jobs and because Apple created a business model around just having few products that are absolutely brilliant.
Ed Elson
I feel like we glorify these people, we glorify Steve Jobs, glorify Elon Musk. And I feel like there's this founder culture, especially with the founder mode thing happening where we like glorify people who are kind of crazy, a little irrational. They shout at people, we need to do this. We can't get it done in time. We'll do it anyway. I don't care. Just sort of like bull in a china shop. But it's like I feel like we don't respect or have enough time or airtime for all of the people that make that happen, who are like actually very organized with their time, very calm, very rational. Sort of the more Bezos types who actually build those systems and make it all possible.
Alex Rinker
Yeah, I think, exactly. I think that there's different styles that work for different situations. I think when you talk about founder mode, of course as a founder, you need to be intense. If you're not intense, you're not going to start a company. Of course you need to be very ambitious. Of course you need to sometimes think against the crowd and set ambitious goals. Of course you can't accept mediocrity. So there is elements there that are very correct, but there's other elements like this complete micromanagement mode. Again, Elon Musk, the bandwidth of the guy is just incredible. We can agree, right? But his company is like, he really dives deep and he builds these individual products that change the world. But that style doesn't work for every company. That I don't think would have worked for Amazon.
Ed Elson
Would it have worked for Celonis?
Alex Rinker
Probably not, I don't think so. If Elon Musk was interested to give us a management coaching, I wouldn't mind saying he can get him to buy. He doesn't know what he's doing. But my point is, I think that some founders run around like this, glorify this, applied blindly to their companies and think they are Steve Jobs, mini Steve Jobs, Elon Musk. And I don't think that always works. So I think you need to really ideally collect some different viewpoints and then form your own independent principals first mindset of what style, what organizations will work. For my company, one of the things I talk about is people talk about product market fit. Someone once mentioned to me, you really need to think about product market people fit. And I was like, that's interesting. So it's actually a really good point. You have to create people in an organization that fit your product and your market. So I think that that also looks different for every company.
Ed Elson
I'm going to start to wrap us up here and I'd like to hear more about processes in your personal life. Cause you've built a company basically predicated on studying processes. So I'd just love to know what role do processes play in your personal life. Do you have any personal processes? Morning routine, workout routine, whatever it is?
Alex Rinker
I have a workout routine that I follow like three, four times a week. I'm pretty disciplined about that. But other than that, honestly, I'm not too much of a process guy in my personal life. I try to leave that to the business. So, you know, I hate. What I hate is I hate to do like think about the same thing five times. So I'm a, you know, lazy guy. I'm a mathematician. Mathematicians are lazy. So, you know, I try to think about, you know, you know, I don't like to think about what I wear every day. So I have like, you know, 10 T shirts, and for most, for many occasions, that's enough, you know, that's the process, you know. But I wouldn't say I'm like hugely process centric in my personal life.
Ed Elson
Well, I feel like wearing the same thing every day is pretty.
Alex Rinker
Well, it's not every day, but, you know, I always try to have a, like, template. Yeah. I don't go to the closet and think, like, okay, what am I going to do today? I try to have like some structure there. But I'm also a wanderer. Like, you know, I have a lot of different interests. Like, you know, every week looks different from a personal standpoint. So it's not that I follow like the same playbook every day.
Ed Elson
I guess what I'm getting at is it feels like I have found in my personal life or just in my life that if I can figure out a way to automate something or do it so habitually that I no longer have to think about it and I can just go like, kind of on automatic mode. It makes the rest of my life.
Alex Rinker
Oh, yeah, I love that. I mean, I love that if something just works, you know, you have like, you know, you have this.
Ed Elson
I cook the same meal every week now and like, I'm just, what do you do? I just make like a bolognese and I just like, put in a giant pot and I'm like, okay, I'm just gonna do this every week. And this way I can like, just not think about this anymore and I can just get on with the rest of my life. That to me, is the start at the Salonis lifestyle.
Alex Rinker
And it gives you this feeling of like this sigh of relief. Right? I didn't have to think about that. Yeah, exactly. And you have free up some mental capacity for something else. Yeah, that's beautiful. You know, look, I think that then hopefully gives you some room for creativity and doing things that are not very process oriented. But. But yeah, I agree. I think it's nice if things work.
Ed Elson
Thank you for taking the time. What would be your number one piece of advice to. I would say entrepreneurs, but maybe let's make it a little more open. Just anyone listening to this podcast, I.
Alex Rinker
Think what's really, really important is that you commit to your passions. When I decided to study math, I had no idea what I wanted to do with it. After my undergrad, I had that. I wanted to study neuroscience. I had the opportunity to do Salonis. And then was really passionate about that. So I jumped on it. I didn't have any clarity whether this would work out or something like that yet. I was really always glad, looking back, that I did it. Now I'm like, maybe neuroscience was a great area to get into with all the AI, but just kidding. But I just think when you love to do something, you are best at it and you got to try to find that and you got to fight for that. I think obviously not every day is going to be the best day of your life, but I think that as a principle that's extremely important. And to your point, AI is going to hopefully help with that, which is going to unleash productivity for everybody that can be distributed. But I think really, especially in your work life, finding something that you really enjoy I think is incredibly important and something that people need to commit to. I think people are still too focused on how will others perceive this, what is the chess game of my next four career moves and that stuff. I think that following what you really believe and finding that and searching for that, I think ultimately leads to better outcomes.
Ed Elson
Alex, thank you. This was great. Alex Rinker is the co founder and co CEO of Celonis, a process mining and process intelligence company. This was wonderful.
Alex Rinker
Thank you so much. Really enjoyed it.
Ed Elson
Awesome. Our producer is Claire Miller, our associate producer is Alison Weiss and our engineer is Benjamin Spencer. Thank you for listening to first time founders from the Vox Media podcast network. Tune in tomorrow for Profg Markets.
Alex Rinker
It.
Summary of "First Time Founders with Ed Elson – How This German Founder Built The Nation’s Most Valuable Startup"
Podcast Information:
Hosts:
Ed Elson kicks off the conversation by introducing Alex Rinker, highlighting Celonis as a pioneering process mining company valued at $13 billion, making it the second most valuable startup in Europe.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“We call it a process intelligence platform. So it doesn't just mine the process, it gives you real time insights in it. It flags when things are going wrong, it helps you orchestrate and optimize processes.” — Alex Rinker [04:38]
The discussion delves into why even successful companies struggle with inefficient processes. Alex shares anecdotes illustrating significant process flaws, such as inadvertent duplicate invoice payments and excessive customer communication delays.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“One of our clients found out that they paid hundreds of millions worth of invoices twice.” — Alex Rinker [10:32]
Ed contrasts the number of unicorns in the US (760) versus Europe (130), emphasizing Celonis as a rare European success story.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“The US gets further and further ahead.” — Alex Rinker [24:33]
Alex attributes Europe's struggle to foster unicorns primarily to its less developed venture capital infrastructure. He contrasts the US’s willingness to invest heavily in high-risk startups with Europe's more conservative investment landscape.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“The primary reason is the venture capital infrastructure. In the US, companies that have a 10% chance of working out can raise $30 million seed rounds.” — Alex Rinker [24:33]
Alex recounts Celonis’s early days, emphasizing the challenges and discipline required to bootstrap the company for six years without external funding.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“We really focused on our customers signing up customers and then continuously building and iterating on the product to make those customers happy and grow with us.” — Alex Rinker [32:37]
Upon entering the US market, Celonis began raising venture capital, securing significant investments over multiple funding rounds.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“You need to have alignment with your investors on what the journey looks like, what you want to do.” — Alex Rinker [35:52]
As Celonis grew from a small team to over 3,000 employees, Alex discusses the necessary transformations in management approaches.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“You have to change yourself completely at least three times.” — Alex Rinker [42:15]
Though Celonis specializes in process optimization, Alex maintains a balance by not overemphasizing processes in his personal life.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“I try to leave that to the business. So, you know, I hate to do like think about the same thing five times.” — Alex Rinker [49:42]
Concluding the conversation, Alex offers valuable advice centered on passion, authenticity, and commitment.
Key Points:
Notable Quote:
“Think what's really, really important is that you commit to your passions.” — Alex Rinker [52:00]
Ed Elson wraps up the episode by thanking Alex Rinker, highlighting his journey from bootstrapping to leading a highly valued startup. The episode underscores the critical role of efficient processes in business success and the challenges faced by European startups in a capital-intensive environment.
Key Takeaways:
Applicable Time Stamps for Notable Quotes:
This comprehensive summary encapsulates the rich discussions between Ed Elson and Alex Rinker, providing actionable insights for entrepreneurs and business leaders aiming to optimize processes and navigate the challenges of scaling a startup in a competitive global landscape.