
Loading summary
Sponsor Announcer
This is a Monday.com ad the same Monday.com designed for every team. The samemonday.com with built in AI scaling your work from day one the same Monday.com with an easy and intuitive setup. Go to Monday.com and try it for free. This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate. Instead, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast. It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate. C According to Indeed data, Sponsored Jobs have four times more applicants than non sponsored jobs. So go build your dream team today with Indeed. Get a $75 sponsored job credit@ Indeed.com podcast. Terms and conditions apply.
Scott Galloway
We heard you nine years of bring back the Snack Wrap and you've won. But maybe you should have asked for more. Say hello to the Hot Honey Snack Wrap. Now you've really won. Go to McDonald's and get you can. Welcome to Office Hours of Prop G. This is the part of the show where we answer your questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship and whatever else is on your mind. If you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording to office hourspropgmedia.com Again, that's officehoursofgmedia.com or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we just might feature it in our next episode. First question Our first question comes from communication number 3650 on Reddit, they say. I'm curious what Scott's thoughts are on Reddit as an investment going forward and its price action. Also its price forecast and if he's still invested. Yeah, I still own shares in Reddit. I think Reddit is phenomena. I think they do a pretty good job. I have mixed feelings on Reddit and Discord is unfortunately I think a lot of young men are deciding they don't need to go out and make friends that they just spend time on Reddit and Discord. But generally speaking, as a consumer offering, I think Reddit is incredible. They've traded roughly between 80 and $280 over the past year, showing, you know, pretty serious volatility for a newer tech social IPO. The current price at the time of recording is $180. This was my big tech stock pick for 2024. I said at 34 bucks a share and granted most people didn't have access to that. I thought it was the most underpriced IPO of that year and we got that one right. The stock now trades at a pretty elevated PE and that is 100 to 120 times earnings, well above the broader market, signaling a lot of growth. Expectations are so in some I'm not a seller here, but I'm not a buyer and the reason I'm not a seller is because I like the company and I essentially the way I have always made money or the way I've made the most money is not trading, but it's buying stuff and holding onto it. For years I've had big tech stock pick. I lost almost all my money in 2008 and I took the remaining money I had and I doubled down on two or three big tech tech companies and they're up between 20 and 50x. By the way, the third company I bought was Netflix. It's up. This is the good News. I bought a 12 bucks a share. The bad news is it's at I sold it at 10 bucks a share to take the tax loss and never bought back in. And I think it's up 110x since then. So I'd be doing this podcast live from a Starlink link on my G650 had I held onto my Netflix stock. But no harm, no foul, other than I would like to invent a time machine, put me in it, go back such that I could murder me and then kill myself. Anyways, little bit of trauma, little bit of trauma. But Reddit right now is what I would call, I don't want to say fully valued because it's an incredible company and appears to be getting a lot of momentum. And if you compare it to other social media platforms, it doesn't look outrageously priced as a multiple on revenues relative to its growth. Having said that, I have trouble buying into stocks after they're up 5 or 600% since the IPO. So but again, I'm not a seller, I'm not a buyer here. What do they have? They have hundreds of millions weekly active users, double digit revenue growth since post ipo, improving margins. The thing that's probably most exciting is that they entered into a licensing agreement, I believe with OpenAI to sell their data for input into these LLMs, whether that lasts or not. Because supposedly LLMs can now synthetically create their own data, which I thought was kind of interesting. But the bull case is that Reddit has hundreds of millions of highly unintentional users and is still under monetized relative to time spent. So it's arpu, or average revenue per user is nowhere near the other platforms, which creates, you know, which is bad news. But it's also good news, meaning there's a lot of opportunity. The bear case simply is valuation. The stock trades at a premium multiple versus traditional media and even some social peers, which means a lot of future growth is already priced in. The consensus average is 250 bucks. The top end of that is 325 and the low forecasts are about 150 bucks. Overall rating consensus is a moderate buy. More buys than hold and a few sells in some. Like I said, I'm not a buyer here, but I'm also not a seller and I own shares, which I guess technically means every day you decide to buy it because you could sell it. Who? Well, mind blown. Question number two. All right, question number two comes from radiative collapse. Radiative collapse. Wow. When do these people get these things? Is there like a name generator on Reddit? They say, hi, Scott, great work you and your team do every week. Thank you. Mostly the team, in your chats with Jessica Tarlov, you've let on that you're getting more into politics and specifically into supporting candidates that will bring the Democratic Party into sync with what the country actually needs in these fraught times. My question is, in your engagement with political players, do you get a sense of where the Democrat is on strategy? Midterms 2028 and beyond. Thanks again and I look forward to your comments. So I'm incredibly disappointed in Democratic leadership, specifically Leader Schumer or Senate Minority Leader Schumer. Even most recently around ice. He said there needs to be restraint and restriction like a bunch of fucking blah, blah. I thought his leadership was epitomized by. I sent a strongly worded letter. Well, that's going to do a lot, Chuck. Thanks for that. I just think he's too old. I think he's too. I don't think he has the weapons at his disposal for change. I think some of the younger Dems, whether it's Talarico or Crockett or aoc, while they're probably a little bit further left than I am, I find that they're stars unafraid and know how to kind of weaponize the weapons of choice and are just, quite frankly, clear blue flame thinkers. And I think, for God's sakes, enough, enough of the Golden Girls and the Walking Dead. It's time for a new generation of Dem leadership. I am consistently inspired when I speak to Democratic Senators. Senator Murphy, Senator Booker, Senators Kelly. I supported Senator Bennett for president. I think he is incredibly smart, moderate. I just think there's a. I think we have an amazing bench. Some of the governors. Governor Shapiro feels like he was built in a factory of lesser presidential candidates or parts from lesser presidential candidates. He is very good. I'm an enormous fan of Govern Newsome. I was at Davos and I walked down into the main Congress hall and there was like this enormous crowd asking what felt like Adele or Lady Gaga or Taylor Swift for autographs. And it was this big, tall, handsome guy with great hair. And I immediately recognized it was the governor. The guy literally walked around Davos as if he was going to be the next president. He just sort of felt and looked that way. And I compared and contrasted with. I saw Lindsey Graham walking around desperately looking for someone to talk to and no one gave a shit about him or that he was there. So I think Governor Newsom. And for all the shit he gets about California, the reality is as governor or president of California, he's overtaking Japan as the largest economy in the world. And all these people shitposting him are shitposting him from their computers in their homes in California. And the people the most options decide to live and wait for at California. Anyway, I think our bench is really strong. Governor Whitmer, I think, would be a decent vp. I think these are. I think there's just. I love Senator Klobuchar. I think she's incredibly smart, understands antitrust, which I think should play a huge role. Anyway, long winded way of saying, I think we have a fantastic bench. I think their strategy right now is to what Sun Tzu said, when your enemy is making mistakes, stay out of their way. I think they're sort of staying out of the way. I think they're doing a good job highlighting how outrageous this is. I think the governor of Minnesota's done a good job. The mayor of Minneapolis has done a good job. The frustration is that, well, okay, what actual impact are they having? The answer is little to none other than raising awareness, which hopefully builds momentum going into 2026, the midterms, and there's already evidence that Dems are beginning to win races they traditionally haven't won before. And then hopefully that carries over into 2028. But Timothy Snyder, the professor from the University of Toronto and the historian, said something really powerful. And he said change never starts with political parties. Change starts with people and then the political parties. So I think I keep hoping for some sort of religious Mandela, Jesus like figure to descend from the hilltop of the Democratic Party and save us all. And I shouldn't hold my breath, but I think their strategy is to highlight, affordability violation of constitutional rights, and what feels like really serious overreach of a mass police force, secret police force, going into American cities and trying to convince, okay, the president believes that harsh activity at the border was warranted and a lot of people support him. And I think he's done a good job at the southern border. But now what he's trying to do is bring the border everywhere in the United States to justify violent, harsh reaction, as if every citizen is trying to illegally enter the country. And that's just not the case. So their strategy, let them continue to shoot themselves in the foot with what is a lot of people consider depraved behavior, focus on affordability, find good candidates and wait till the election. I don't think that's, I think that's a good strategy for the midterms. I don't think it's the right strategy for now. I think we need to do more that has a more of a short term impact because I think unfortunately between now and November, the Trump administration can do a lot of damage. Very much appreciate the question. We'll be right back after a quick break. Foreign.
Sponsor Announcer
Rewards, Renters out there, listen up. It's about time you earn something back on your biggest monthly expense. Because you can earn loyalty points on pretty much anything these days, so why not on your rent? BILT is the loyalty program for renters that rewards you monthly with points and exclusive benefits in your neighborhood. With bilt, every rent payment can earn you points that can be used towards flights, hotels, Lyft rides, Amazon.com purchases and so much more. And starting this month, Bilt members can earn points on mortgage payments for the first time. That means you'll be able to get rewarded wherever you live. Plus, using Bilt unlocks exclusive benefits. With more than 45,000 restaurants, fitness studios, pharmacies and other neighborhood partners, you can redeem build points for built home delivery services, gift cards at over 120 brands, or even towards student loan balances. Bottom line is this paying rent is better with bilt. And now owning a home can be better with BILT too. Earn rewards and get something back wherever you Join the loyalty program for renters at joinbilt.com profji that's J-O-I-N-B-I-L-T.com profg make sure to use our URL so they know we sent you. Support for the show comes from rippling. No one likes running a bunch of disconnected tools to do simple tasks. It creates a ton of busy work, eating up your whole team's time and efficiency. Whether you're in it, HR or a finance team, your company's operating all in one platform should actually be able to do it all. And Rippling says they can do it all. It's a unified platform for global hr, payroll, IT and finance with rippling. Workflows that normally bounce across various tools and departments all just happen in one place automatically. Say an employee gets remoted or moves. Rippling can update payroll taxes, hand out new app permissions, ship a new laptop, issue a new corporate card, and assign required manager training all in one place without you having to put in all the legwork. With Rippling, you can run your entire hr, IT and finance operations as one. Or pick and choose the the products that best fills the gap in your software stack. So if you or your company want to run the backbone of your business on one unified platform with people at the center, head to rippling.com profg and sign up today. That's R-I P P L-I N G.com profg to sign up.
Scott Galloway
Support for the show comes from NetSuite. We hear all the time how AI can push business to new frontiers, but what does that actually look like for you and your company? The answer starts with NetSuite by Oracle. NetSuite is a top AI cloud ERP trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It's a unified suite that brings your.
Sponsor Announcer
Financials, inventory, commerce, HR and CRM into.
Scott Galloway
A single source of truth. With all that connected data, your AI doesn't throw out its best guests, it actually knows what it's talking about. It can intelligently automate routine tasks, deliver actionable insights and help make fast AI powered decisions with confidence. Now with NetSuite AI connector, you can.
Sponsor Announcer
Use the AI of your choice to.
Scott Galloway
Connect to your actual business data. Plus you can automate those tiresome manual processes.
Sponsor Announcer
It's AI built into the system that.
Scott Galloway
Runs your business, affording you total flexibility. Get ahead of the game and put AI to work today with NetSuite. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get the free business.
Sponsor Announcer
Guide demystifying AI at netsuite.com profg the.
Scott Galloway
Guide is free to you at netsuite.com propg netsuite.com profg. Welcome back onto our final question which comes from Derek who emailed us. Hey Prof. G. I'm a 33 year old private chef living in the Bay Area. I'm married and own my home. My wife and I make a modest salary 240k combined and are able to max out our Roth IRAs each year while still being able to put away 10 to 15k for investing. For my entire time in the markets, I've been using betterment to manage my portfolio. I'm contemplating hiring a financial advisor. Betterment charges 0.25% of my 170k portfolio, whilst an advisor would charge 1%. What do you think about financial advisors and what would they need to do to earn their 1% commission? God, it's just so strange that someone at 33 who's been fortunate enough to find someone to share their life with and makes $240,000 describes that as a modest salary. I would bet 240k puts you in the top decile. So at the age of 33 you're already in the top decile of income earning households. Now the problem is in the Bay Area that feels very middle class. I lived in Potrero Hill, then Inoue valley. True story. First house I bought in 1994 was in Potrero Hill. 285,000. I then bought a house in Noe Valley. I came out of the gate strong. I peaked early. I was invited to Davis in 99 and just got back. Invited back 27 years. What have I done the last 27 years? Let me see. Dot bomb, implosion, a bunch of failed businesses, a divorce. Yeah, yeah, that's what I've done. No wonder that I'm back. Anyways, I then bought a house on Dolores on 21st for 760k. That ended up being the house next to where Mark Zuckerberg. Ultimately I think it's worth like 10 or 11 million. I sold it a couple years later and moved to New York for 950,000 and thought I was a fucking real estate genius. Jesus Christ. See above. Want to find a time machine? Go back and kill myself. Okay, back to your question. So I would not hire a financial advisor at 1%, 1% doesn't sound that bad. But at 1% compounding. Compounding literally takes away a third of your returns. And when I say returns, I mean inflation adjusted, you should be able to get 9% in the market over the long term. And paying out 1% a year, even in down years, it just wrecks your portfolio. And with AI and investment allocators or bots and even good, there's really good financial information. I think you could spend a lot of time developing a really long prompt, being very honest about your risk tolerance, what you're hoping to achieve. Use different LLMs after February of course, because you're unsubscribing in February and then invest in low cost diversified index and ETFs. I just think at the age of 33, you're going to wake up, you're going to be my age, 53, 61, and you're going to realize how fast time went. And if you just diversify across not only asset classes but geographies, you're going to be just fine. So especially if you're able to put away, say you're able to put away an average of $20,000 a year. Okay, let's do the math here. So I'm about to blow your mind, Eric. The difference. Okay, so I'm going to assume, and I don't know if this is right, you have a quarter of a million dollars already, you're going to be able to save on average $20,000 a year. And it sounds like you'll probably be able to save more as your income goes up. If you're 33 and for the next 30 years, and I'm going to assume you already have a quarter of a million dollars, maybe that's right or wrong. If you get 9%, which you should be able to get over the long term, that's what the markets have returned since inception. In 30 years you're going to have $6.1 million. Now assume you pay 1% a year in advisory fees. In 30 years investing and saving the exact same amount, you're going to have 4.5 million. Think about that. You're going to have 33% more in 30 years avoiding that 1%. So what I find advisors are really helpful for is quite frankly, tax optimization, which is a long winded way of saying or fancy way of tax evasion. And if your taxes ever get complicated, I think it's worthwhile to hire a tax Advisor. But paying 1% of a year to a financial advisor who if they're smart, is just going to put you in low cost index funds and then sometimes puts you in their own funds which have their own fees which are hidden to you. This is what you're going to do. So you're going to want to put that money on low cost funds either with Vanguard, Fidelity, Schwab, GQG funds, low cost diversification. That's it. And my fear is the financial advisor not only takes that 6.1 and turns it into 4.5, but takes down even lower by picking their own vertical private label funds that charge you additional fees. So yeah, this is some work. Upload everything your W2s, your income, how much you're saving, your current portfolio and start asking these LLMs what are the lowest cost funds that can give me diversification across asset classes and geographies? And go into those and pay yourself that 1% because keep in mind that money adds up. It's the difference between 6.1 million when you're my age and 4.5. So boss, no no to the 1%, held to the no of the 1% low cost diversified funds and do your own work here and pay yourself. It's worth it. Oh, and also, never ever work with anyone offers to take you to a basketball game, a Broadway show, or send you expensive gifts, because that means that that trip to the basketball game is costing you tens of thousands of dollars. Vanguard doesn't take anyone to basketball games. GQG doesn't take anyone to the theater all right, that's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehouse media.com again, that's office hours@prof.2media.com or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we just might feature it in an upcoming episode. This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Laura Geniere. Cami Reek is our social producer, Brad Williams is our video editor, and Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the ProPG pod from ProPG Media.
Sponsor Announcer
Starting a business can seem like a daunting task unless you have a partner like Shopify. They have the tools you need to start and grow your business. From designing a website to marketing to selling and beyond, Shopify can help with everything you need. There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Heinz and Allbirds continue to trust and use them. With Shopify on your side, turn your big business idea into Sign up for your $1 per month trial@shopify.com specialoffer.
Episode Title: Is Reddit Still a Buy? Democratic Strategy and Rethinking Financial Advisors
Release Date: February 9, 2026
Host: Scott Galloway (Vox Media Podcast Network)
In this Office Hours episode, Scott Galloway fields listener questions on three major topics:
Galloway blends his trademark candor, humor, and hard-won financial wisdom throughout, offering actionable advice and sharp takedowns, with memorable detours into his own financial regrets and political preferences.
Main Discussion Points:
Quote Highlights:
Key Bull and Bear Cases:
Memorable Moment:
Main Discussion Points:
Quote Highlights:
Memorable Moment:
Main Discussion Points:
Quote Highlights:
Memorable Moment:
Scott Galloway’s Office Hours delivers a rapid-fire yet thorough handling of each listener question, interspersed with vivid anecdotes and unmistakable Prof G humor. Each segment includes:
His tone remains candid, irreverent, and pragmatic throughout.
This episode is a must-listen for:
Above all, Galloway emphasizes the long game, skepticism of high fees, and the power of new leadership—be it in tech, politics, or your own finances.