Loading summary
Google Chrome Advertiser
This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50 page restoration block. Or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it, ready to make anything online make sense. There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up, required compatibility and availability. Veris 18
Indeed Sponsored Jobs Advertiser
when you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit@ Indeed.com podcast. That's Indeed.com podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored
Various Advertisers (Starbucks, Mint Mobile, Blinds.com, Stamps.com)
Jobs Morning Decisions how about a creamy Mocha Frappuccino drink? Or sweet vanilla smooth caramel maybe? Or white chocolate mocha? Whichever you choose, delicious coffee awaits. Find Starbucks Frappuccino drinks wherever you buy your groceries.
Podcast Host or Commentator
Two months ago, I called bullshit on the AI jobs apocalypse narrative. More recently, Sam Altman, Dario Amodi, and other AI leaders pumped the brakes on their claims of a coming white collar bloodbath. The zombie narrative marches on, however, supporting the incorrect conclusion that AI is to blame for the bleak job market young people face. But according to new research from lse, Oxford and the New York Fed AI, the AI effect nearly disappears when you control for remote work. Translation, the reason your kid can't find a job isn't AI, it's your couch. See my recent deep dive on this topic. Work from Home, like so many other choices our society embraces, is yet another front in our war on the young. That war was the subject of my 2024 TED talk, which was the number one presentation last year.
Guest or Co-host (possibly Scott Galloway)
Weak Flex.
Podcast Host or Commentator
Sadly, the war continues. This week, we share a rerun War on the young Originally published Apr 19, 2024.
Scott Galloway
I'm Scott Galloway, and this is no mercy, no malice. Do we love our children? We say we do, but as a society, our actions suggest otherwise. War on the Young as read by George Hahn.
Guest or Co-host (possibly Scott Galloway)
This week I spoke at TED 2024, the iconic program's 40th anniversary event. I joined RuPaul, Kesha and two different astrophysicists on the stage in Vancouver. I was given 15 minutes and took 17 to rifle through 47 slides articulating what I believe is the greatest challenge facing the US it's not inequality, climate change or war in the Middle east, but an issue that threads these threats together. America's war on the young, a war of mutually assured destruction. A decent proxy for the success of a society is how it treats children. Not how individuals parent, but the success of the structures, incentives and leadership charged with preventing a tragedy of the commons. In sum, can we answer a simple question? Do we love our children in 2024America? The rejoinder is disheartening. We've broken the social contract that binds America. Work hard, play by the rules, and you'll be better off than your parents were. For the first time in our nation's history, this is no longer true. Today's 25 year olds make less than their parents and grandparents did at the same age, yet they carry student debt loads for unimaginable to earlier generations. Neither the minimum nor median wage has kept pace with inflation or productivity gains, while housing costs have outpaced them. The statistics on children's and young adults well being are staggering. None of this is lost on young people, and the shattering of the social contract has left them feeling rage and shame. Half of Americans older than 55 say they are extremely proud to be American. That number drops to 18% among 18 to 34 year olds. This weakens the immunity system of America, allowing minor cuts to US society to bring on deadly opportunistic infections. Just as when someone in your life blows up at you, it's about the issue at hand. And it isn't. American youth's warranted concern on social justice issues, despite remarkable progress on all these issues, turns seamlessly into rage. We don't lack the resources to level up young people and present the opportunities afforded my generation. But the cohorts who benefited most from the extraordinary post war economic boom of the 20th century and have pulled the ladder up behind them. In 1989, adults under 40 held 12% of household wealth, while those over 70 held 19%. Today, those under 40 command just 7% of household wealth, while those Over 70 control 30%. Higher education is the most effective means of closing the generation gap, but the incumbents have artificially constrained access, sequestering opportunity largely to wealthy households peppered with a few freakishly remarkable kids from the lower 90%. To smear Vaseline over the casting of higher ed, elite schools tout their financial aid, emphasizing that students with median household incomes pay little or no tuition. But it's a head fake being more generous with a select few low income students only wallpapers over exclusivity when the goal should be to eliminate it. We have simply reshuffled the elites. Harvard's undergraduate class size has been static at 1600 for half a century, while its endowment has grown nearly 500%. When your top line revenue is up sixfold but you purposefully do not increase production, you are no longer a public servant but a Chanel bag. Single digit admissions rates are the ultimate vanity metric, something deans and donors brag about at cocktail parties when they should be a mark of shame. As I've proposed before, we should offer higher ed a grand bargain. Redirect the money earmarked for bailing out the one third of America that has attended college to increasing freshman seats and reducing costs. The Biden administration's proposed student bailouts shrink the tumor, but don't address the underlying cancer, declining affordability and accessibility. We have elevated capital over sweat, that is labor. The public is numb to this mythology, benefiting the incumbents who've created it. Back in 2008, when the market crashed, young ish people like me, coming into our prime income earning years, were able to buy growth stocks at low valuations. The foundation of my economic security was buying Amazon at $7, $179 today and Apple at $7, $167 today and Netflix at $12, $611 today. Ever since, however, we've inflated asset prices by pumping them full of steroids and stimulus, using low corporate tax rates and bailouts that are financed on the backs of young people. Keep me rich on your credit card, said every American over the age of 50 to citizens younger than them. In sum, real median income from labor is up 40% since 1974, while the S&P 500 is up 4,000 thousand percent. We've protected the wealth created by ownership at the expense of income earned by labor through the tax code, which favors gains from investments. Gains from stock sales are taxes. At lower capital gains rates, real estate holdings can appreciate tax free, and once sold, the gains can be rolled into another investment again, a series of transfers of wealth from earners to owners and what taxes are collected are increasingly redistributed to the generation who needs them least. In 1985, the federal government spent three times more per capita on seniors than it did on kids. By 2019, that ratio has risen to eight times times. We've cut senior poverty from 17% in the 1970s to 9% today, which is admirable. But child poverty has risen over that same period from 16% to 19%. The demo in Democratic is failing us as seniors vote seniors into office who then vote themselves more money. With neither age limits nor term limits and incumbent re election rates over 90% congressional seats have become lifetime appointments. Nancy Pelosi may be the sharpest 83 year old in Congress, but her time has passed. She has a daughter who was born during the Johnson administration when less than 1/3 of homes had a color TV. Does our leadership really relate to the challenges facing a 15 year old girl being sent messages on extreme dieting by Meta or the budding addiction crisis of young men on phone based gambling apps? We need Churn to recalibrate and transfer wealth, but it's been dampened with retardants that cost trillions. D.C. has become a cross between the walking Dead and the Golden Girls and its denizens see the living young as nutrition versus the future. To appease King Minos of Crete, ancient Athens sacrificed seven young men and seven young women to the Minotaur he kept under his palace. Then Theseus slew the Minotaur. Today in America, we're offering an entire generation to the Minotaurs of big Tech and our Theseus. Congress can only stand by and make speeches. Teen depression and self harm, Bullying, loneliness and obesity have shot up since social media began haunting them. 247 Since 2017, Congress has held 40 hearings on children and social media and past nothing to address the problem. Democrats and Republicans have introduced legislation including to age gate social and to reform section 230 which immunizes Internet platforms from most litigation, but nothing gets done. At the last dramatic reading of what ails us, Senator Dick Durbin admitted to failure. The tech industry alone is not to blame for the situation we're in. Those of us in Congress need to look in the mirror. We need to make tech platforms liable for the harms they cause. We should eliminate Section 230's liability shield for algorithmically elevated content. Freedom of speech isn't free. The US is the 10th happiest country in the world for people over 60 and the 62nd happiest for people under 30. Young people are economically disadvantaged, threatened by climate change and voiceless thanks to our dysfunctional politics. And they've been manipulated from childhood by a toxic cocktail of pet paleolithic instincts, medieval institutions and godlike technology. We have broken the social contract and younger generations aren't going to fulfill their end of it. In 1993, 60% of 30 to 34 year olds had at least one child. Today that number is 27%. Young people aren't meeting or mating and the consequences will be dire. Young people's labor powers the economy and their taxes pay for the services consumed by old people. Without robust youth employment, Social Security will go bankrupt, debt service will consume the federal budget, and the Commonwealth will collapse. We've created a future so unappealing that youth is opting out. The incumbents will throw their arms up like an 8 year old who refuses to take responsibility. The plea of complexity is an illusion. Every problem we have levied on young people can be addressed. We have the hard part figured out how to grow the economy at a sustained rate to pay for programs that might turn things around. There are just a few programs and fixes we could try in economics, technology, social policy and mental health. I had my first child at 42 and it changed my life. I became more responsible, focused, concerned about the future and empathetic. In sum, I became a better American. Children make us better. We care for our kids, but do we love children? Somewhere along the way, we lost the script. As a society, if we have the resources to address these issues, and we do, Nvidia added a quarter of a trillion to the economy in five minutes post earnings but continue to look the other way, then we have to ask, is America worth investing in? And do we really love our children?
Scott Galloway
Life is so rich.
Ryan Reynolds (Mint Mobile Advertiser)
Hi, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Are you looking for a beach read this summer? May I suggest your big wireless bill? It's got suspense, mystery, a slightly flat emotional arc, and a shocking twist where you realize you've been overpaying the entire time. Fortunately, though, Mint's story is better. Every plan $15 a month, even unlimited. That's it. Happy ending. Zero tears. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment
Various Advertisers (Starbucks, Mint Mobile, Blinds.com, Stamps.com)
of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12 month Plan required $15 per month equivalent taxes and fees extra initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy seeing terms.
Blinds.com Advertiser
The right window treatments change everything. Your sleep, your privacy, the way every room looks and feels. @blinds.com, we've spent 30 years making it surprisingly simple to get exactly what your home needs. We've covered over 25 million windows and have 50,000 five star reviews to prove we deliver. Whether you DIY it or want a pro to handle everything from measure to install, we have you covered. Real design professionals, free samples. Zero pressure right now. Get up to 45% off site wide plus get a free professional measure@blinds.com rules and restrictions apply.
Various Advertisers (Starbucks, Mint Mobile, Blinds.com, Stamps.com)
Shipping, billing admin, payroll, marketing. You're managing all the things, so why waste time sending important documents the old fashioned way? Mail and ship when you want, how you want with stamps.com print postage on demand 247 and schedule pickups from your office or home. Save up to 90% with automated rate shopping. That's why over 1 million million small businesses trust stamps. Com. Go to stamps.com and use code podcast to try stamps.com risk free for 60 days.
Episode: No Mercy / No Malice: War on the Young
Date: July 11, 2026
Host: Scott Galloway
Produced by: Vox Media Podcast Network
This episode of the Prof G Pod features a potent rebroadcast of Scott Galloway's essay "War on the Young," originally delivered at TED 2024. Galloway dissects the increasingly hostile economic, political, and social environment younger generations face in America. He frames the societal crisis as a "war" waged by older generations against the young, critiquing the broken intergenerational contract, eroding economic mobility, soaring higher education costs, and the corrosive influence of entrenched political power. Throughout, Galloway demands both accountability and action from the incumbents who, he argues, have created a future so precarious that youth are “opting out.”
[01:13]
[02:34-03:50]
[03:50-06:30]
[06:30-09:55]
[09:55-12:50]
[12:50-14:30]
[14:30-16:21]
On AI and employment:
On higher education’s exclusivity:
On political incumbency:
On Congress failing youth on tech regulation:
On the stakes:
On the need for love and investment:
Last words:
Scott Galloway delivers a blistering account of America’s war on its young people, arguing that systemic choices—not technological inevitability—have left a generation with less wealth, fewer opportunities, and little faith in the future. He exposes the older generation’s policy, political, and economic maneuvers as a betrayal of the supposed American promise, calling for urgent reforms and an honest reckoning with whether, as a society, we truly “love our children.”