Prof G Markets: The Trump Fold & Tesla’s Brand Death

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway Episode: Prof G Markets: The Trump Fold & Tesla’s Brand Death
Release Date: April 28, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of The Prof G Pod, Scott Galloway and co-host Ed Mylett delve into pressing issues affecting the capital markets, focusing on the controversial rise of Trump’s Meme Coin, Boeing’s recent earnings performance, escalating wealth inequality, Trump’s abrupt policy reversals, and Tesla’s disappointing first-quarter results. The conversation intertwines sharp business analysis with provocative insights into the socio-political landscape shaping today’s economic environment.

---

1. Trump Coin and Capital Markets

Overview: Scott and Ed kick off the discussion with the unexpected surge of President Donald Trump’s Meme Coin. Trump’s invitation to the top 220 holders of his cryptocurrency for a private dinner at the White House caused the token’s value to spike by over 60%.

Key Points:

• Corruption Concerns: Scott criticizes the initiative as a blatant act of corruption, labeling it "pure grift" and unprecedented in presidential history.

• Impact on Investors: Highlighting the zero-sum nature of meme coins, Scott points out that while a few insiders profited, approximately 800,000 regular investors collectively lost over $2 billion ([05:48]).

• Democratic Contrasts: Scott draws parallels with Democratic corruption, suggesting that both parties engage in unethical financial maneuvering but differ in their approaches ([07:35]).

Notable Quotes:

• Scott Galloway: “This is easily the greatest financial grift in the history of presidents.” ([06:00])
• Ed Mylett: “It is pure grift, pure corruption.” ([07:20])

---

2. Boeing’s Earnings Performance

Overview: The conversation shifts to Boeing’s first-quarter earnings, where the company reported a significant 18% year-over-year revenue increase and delivered a robust 6% stock climb despite ongoing trade tensions.

Key Points:

• Tariff Optimism: Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg expressed optimism about the tariff environment, suggesting a turnaround by 2025, which Scott interprets as possible inside knowledge or expectations of tariff reductions ([14:20]).

• Trump’s Influence: Scott speculates that Trump may have manipulated market sentiments to favor Boeing, enhancing its financial performance amid a trade war ([17:50]).

• Market Reactions: Ed notes that CEOs from major corporations are receiving early alerts from the White House about trade deals, blurring the lines between fair trading and insider information, potentially fostering an environment ripe for insider trading ([16:27]).

Notable Quotes:

• Scott Galloway: “Boeing has incredible pricing power and is part of a duopoly with Airbus.” ([17:10])
• Ed Mylett: “The administration is proactively alerting Wall Street executives.” ([16:30])

---

3. Escalating Wealth Inequality

Overview: Scott and Ed explore a new report highlighting that the top 19 wealthiest households in America accumulated an unprecedented $1 trillion in net worth in 2024, exacerbating wealth inequality.

Key Points:

• Statistical Insights: The top 19 households now hold 1.8% of America's total household wealth, a dramatic rise from 0.1% in 1982. Conversely, the bottom 50% own a mere 3% ([20:51]).

• Social Implications: Scott argues that such stark inequality undermines societal cohesion and economic stability, drawing historical parallels to revolutions sparked by severe income disparities ([22:57]).

• Political Repercussions: Ed highlights the resurgence of Bernie Sanders-like movements, citing a recent rally in California that drew 36,000 attendees, emphasizing that income inequality remains the defining issue of the era ([24:20]).

Notable Quotes:

• Scott Galloway: “Crazy income inequality is a common feature in all revolution-prone societies.” ([21:30])
• Ed Mylett: “This is the defining issue of our time and our generation.” ([24:00])

---

4. Trump’s Policy Reversals

Overview: The hosts analyze President Trump’s sudden reversals on key policies, particularly regarding tariffs and his stance on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

Key Points:

• Tariff Fluctuations: Trump initially imposed a 145% tariff on Chinese imports but recently signaled substantial reductions and exemptions for certain sectors like auto parts and steel/aluminum ([32:33]).

• Market Impact: These reversals initially buoyed major indices—NASDAQ up 2.5%, S&P 500 up 3%, Dow Jones up over 1%—but broader market sentiment remained negative due to ongoing brand erosion ([35:37]).

• Brand Damage: Scott emphasizes the long-term erosion of the U.S. brand, reducing goodwill with allies and diminishing the country's reputation as a reliable economic partner ([38:23]).

Notable Quotes:

• Scott Galloway: “Donald Trump is eroding our brand, making us more vulnerable to opportunistic infections.” ([38:23])
• Ed Mylett: “China is dawn to rekindle relationships, and we’re racing against the clock.” ([40:46])

---

5. Tesla’s Earnings and Brand Issues

Overview: The final segment scrutinizes Tesla’s first-quarter performance, which fell short of expectations with a 71% year-over-year decline in net income and a 20% drop in automotive revenue. Additionally, Elon Musk’s diverted focus to Dogecoin and other projects raised concerns about Tesla’s strategic direction.

Key Points:

• Financial Decline: Scott highlights Tesla's 20% decline in automotive revenue as unprecedented for an American car company, noting the severe impact on operating margins ([46:16]).

• Elon’s Leadership: Both hosts criticize Elon Musk for prioritizing Dogecoin over Tesla, interpreting his actions as a distraction that harms the company’s core business ([54:31]).

• Meme Stock Phenomenon: Scott describes Tesla’s stock as exhibiting “meme stock” characteristics, where stock prices are influenced more by CEO antics and storytelling than by fundamental business performance ([58:57]).

• Future Prospects: Despite the negative earnings report, the stock saw a 5% after-hours rise, partly attributed to optimism over upcoming projects like the Robotaxi and Optimus humanoid robot. However, both hosts remain skeptical about the feasibility and immediate impact of these initiatives ([60:50]).

Notable Quotes:

• Scott Galloway: “Tesla is a case study in meme stocks where stock price disassociates from fundamentals.” ([50:21])
• Ed Mylett: “Elon is in a state of denial and panicked confusion.” ([54:31])

---

Concluding Insights

Scott Galloway and Ed Mylett provide a critical examination of the interplay between political maneuvers and market dynamics. They underscore the detrimental effects of wealth concentration, unethical financial strategies, and erratic leadership on both economic stability and societal well-being. The episode emphasizes the need for systemic changes to address entrenched inequalities and calls for greater accountability in both political and corporate spheres.

Final Notable Quote:

• Scott Galloway: “We’re in an irrational market where the stock price begins to absolutely disassociate from the fundamentals.” ([60:50])

---

Additional Notes:

• Episode Credits: Produced by Claire Miller, engineered by Benjamin Spencer, with contributions from Alison Weiss, Miel Silverio, Isabella Kinsel, Dan Shalon, Drew Burrows, and Catherine Dillon.

• Upcoming Episode Teaser: The hosts preview a future conversation with Mark Mahaney, highlighting ongoing analyses of market and economic trends.

---

This comprehensive summary captures the essence of the episode, outlining key discussions and critical viewpoints presented by Scott Galloway and Ed Mylett. Notable quotes are included with timestamp references to provide context and depth to the analysis.

Transcript

[Scott Galloway]

Support for the show comes from public.com if you're serious about investing, you need to know about public.com that's where you can invest in everything. Stocks, options, bonds and more and even earn a 6% or higher yield that you can lock in with a bond account. Visit public.comproPG and get up to $10,000 when you transfer your old portfolio. That's public.com Prof. G paid for by Public Investing. All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. Private brokerage services for U.S. listed registered securities options and bonds in a self directed account are offered by Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC. Complete disclosures [e-mail] disclosures I should also disclose I am an investor in Public. Support for this show comes from Nordstrom. Nordstrom brings you the season's most wanted brands, Skims, Mango Free People and Princess polly, all under $100. From trending sneakers to beautif beauty must haves, they've curated the styles you'll wear on repeat this spring. Free shipping, free returns and in store pickup make it easier than ever. Shop now in stores [e-mail] right now.

[Ed Mylett]

The Home Depot has spring deals under $20.

[Scott Galloway]

So no matter what you're working on, the deals are blooming at the Home.

[Ed Mylett]

Depot with savings on plants, flowers, soil and more.

[Scott Galloway]

Then light up your outdoor space with Hampton Bay string lights was $34.97, now only $19.99. And get the grill going with two.

[Ed Mylett]

16 pound bags of Kingsford charcoal was $19.98, now only $17.88.

[Scott Galloway]

Don't miss spring deals under $20 now through May 7 at the home Depot. Subject to availability valid on select Items only. Today's number 283. That's the percentage increase in viewership of the movie Conclave the day after Pope Francis died. Ed, what does a priest's scrotum look like?

[Ed Mylett]

Oh boy, I don't know. I don't know. What does a priest's scrotum look like?

[Scott Galloway]

Come on man. Every welcome to Prof. G Markets. Rest in peace, El Papa. Rest in peace. I just love that J.D. vance killed the Pope. I absolutely love that it answers the Fuck Mary kill, right? We got the couch, we got his wife. Now we got the kill. I'm recycling every I'm a walking meme right now, Ed. I'm a walking meme. What's going on with you? It's time for banter.

[Ed Mylett]

Let's see what is going on with me. I hung out with Anthony Scaramucci Yesterday, which is very fun.

[Scott Galloway]

The Mooch. Where did you hang out with Anthony?

[Ed Mylett]

I went to his office, went to Skybridge, took me around, showed me all of his paraphernalia and his books. And by the way, I learned that Anthony was a classics major.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah, he's actually. He has sort of this Long island feel about him, but he's not that Long island people aren't well read, but he's very. He. You get the sense he's kind of a blue collar guy. He's actually very well read and very intelligent. I like him a lot.

[Ed Mylett]

I'm a huge fan of his.

[Scott Galloway]

Let me guess, you're starting a podcast. The rest. The rest is Ed. Isn't this other thing. The rest is fine. The rest is Ed.

[Ed Mylett]

I think. You're starting a podcast with him.

[Scott Galloway]

We're actually doing it. We're doing something, a limited series called the Lost Boys.

[Ed Mylett]

What is that, your 20th podcast? What are we at now?

[Scott Galloway]

Look, everyone. I do I make another 10 or 12 bucks in gross margin, so, you know, baby needs new shoes. And listen to my. Listen to how dreamy my voice is. Now look at me. Listen to my voice. Now look at me. Enough said. Podcasts. Podcasts.

[Ed Mylett]

The money maker.

[Scott Galloway]

You know it. By the way, how was your time with your father?

[Ed Mylett]

It was great. I had a great time.

[Scott Galloway]

And your parents live in the uk, Is that. Oh, no, they live here now.

[Ed Mylett]

No, no, no, they're still not. Yeah, he was just visiting.

[Scott Galloway]

Not that I don't know anything about you, Ed. What's your last name again? Wait, hold on.

[Ed Mylett]

See, banter for us is just sort of like getting to know each other, right? Yeah, we're still not quite there yet. Been four years, but we're getting close.

[Scott Galloway]

They live in the uk.

[Ed Mylett]

Yeah, they do. I'll have to set you up. You can go get a drink with my dad at Kensington Gardens.

[Scott Galloway]

I can see that. I'm actually sort of. I don't want to say other, but I'm curious about your dad. What did your dad do professionally?

[Ed Mylett]

Finance.

[Scott Galloway]

And you went to Princeton, huh? Boy, it's been rough, Fred. It's just amazing you've overcome all this adversity. Really impressive.

[Ed Mylett]

The biggest adversity I've had in my life is you, Scott.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah, I'm here for a reason, my brother. And it's only getting started. Get to the headlines.

[Ed Mylett]

Let's start with our weekly review of market vitals. The S&P 500 climbed the dollar hit a three year low. Bitcoin rose and the yield on 10 year treasuries declined. Shifting to the headlines, President Trump is inviting the top 220 holders of his Meme Coin to join him for a private dinner. That news sent the token's price up more than 60% as investors rushed to increase their hold and secure a spot. Boeing shares climbed 6% after the company posted first quarter earnings that beat expectations, with revenue up 18% year over year. The stock also got a boost the day before on a $10.6 billion partial sale of its navigation business. And finally, a new report shows that in 2024 alone, the 19 wealthiest households in America added $1 trillion to their net worth. That is the largest single year increase on record. Scott, your thoughts starting with Trump Coin. Trump is inviting the top holders of Trump Coin to an exclusive dinner and also a VIP tour of the White House. This is great news, isn't it?

[Scott Galloway]

I think we hit a new low where we're selling off access to the president and a dinner based on his Swiss who puts the most money in a Swiss banking account. And the reality is these are the amateurs or the people, the cultists who are fascinated by him. The most important people in terms of the Trump meme coin would never show up because what they've done is they've bought a bunch of Meme coins, probably with his permission or his encouragement in exchange for geopolitical advantage from America. It would never dare thinking of showing up. I got to give it to him for being this transparent. I think the Democrats have what I call low grade diet co corruption, where Speaker Amber Tlosi trades stocks for tens or hundreds of thousands or maybe or millions. And he's like, if you're going to be corrupt, go big and create a vessel. And somebody pitched him on this and he said, yes, where you can make billions. And that's what he's done here. And I hope this thing gets a lot of attention and a lot of people start focusing on what is easily the greatest financial grift in the history of presidents. I can't think of. I mean, it just cracks me up that people were pissed off about Hunter Biden going on a board which he shouldn't have been on. We need to know what he was doing in China and Russia while his father was vice president and or while his father was preparing to become the president. This is corruption at its core, folks. This is what people hate about the swamp. This is part of how Donald Trump won in the first place, saying that we're going to get rid of these sweetheart deals. We're going to make sure that we clean up the axis of power in a place like Washington D.C. and yet we have a meme coin and he's inviting people to the White House for the dinner. I don't know. I find the whole thing, it's verging on comical if it wasn't so tragic.

[Ed Mylett]

I think that's exactly right. I think this is the most egregious act we've seen from this administration so far. And we can talk about the tariffs and the deportations and the threats to Jerome Powell, et cetera. None of that's good. But you can at least begin to fashion an argument as to why in some version of reality, it might be beneficial to the nation. You couldn't make a good argument, not a rational argument, you couldn't make a sane argument, but you could try to make the argument. You could try to say we need to reshore jobs, et cetera. There's no argument for this. You can't even attempt to steel man this. It is pure grift, pure corruption. Using the White House, using the presidency as a vehicle to shake down regular investors, not wealthy political donors, which you can make the argument that maybe the Democrats do, but retail investors in order to raise money, again, not for some greater cause, not even to fund some political campaign, but purely to enrich your friends, to enrich your family, and to enrich your allies. This is completely unheard of. And I just want to highlight that lockup period, which it was a three month lockup period. It basically meant that the insiders of the coin can't sell until the period expires. So this is very important when, and we said this, we need to pay attention to when the lockup period expires. It expired last week. So is it any surprise that this bullshit incentive plan to pump up the price of the coin, which is leading to this rat race where its winner takes dinner with the President, that sent the coin skyrocketing up 60% in one night. Is it any surprise that this coincided right when the lockup period expired? Definitely not. And I think what we'll find out soon enough is that the insiders, this was their Hail Mary that they threw right before they sell. And I would not be surprised if we find out that they sold, that they profited significantly off of this, not in terms of what they realized in a gain on Trump coin, but in dollar terms. I think they announced the dinner and then we find out they cashed out. And I just want to remind you again of the damage that this does to regular investors. Let's look back to a few months ago when the coin was first launched. You look at the on chain data and you will find that there were 31 early traders who made a profit of almost $700 million trading this coin. And you think, boy, that sounds pretty corrupt. But then you see the 800,000 other investors who lost cumulatively more than $2 billion. And this is what we have to remember about meme coins. And this is why this is so dark. This is a zero sum game. For every winner, there is a loser. In fact, more often than not, thousands of losers. And the losers, I hate to say it, are the ones who are dumb enough to buy into this shit. And that's also what I find so disturbing about this. It's the fact that the Trump Organization actually knows that. They know that there is a certain percentage of their fan base that is dumb enough to do whatever they tell them to do to jump off a cliff if Trump demands it. Not the whole fan base, but certainly a percentage of it. And in this case, jumping off the cliff means throwing away your savings to bet on this rigged casino game that is disguised as a meet and greet with the President and a VIP tour of the White House. I mean, I am just still shocked, and I'm with you, that it's comical. It is comical because it's so shameless. But that shouldn't detract us from calling it what it is, which is unprecedented corruption and it is tragic.

[Scott Galloway]

His team also collects fees on each trade and They've earned roughly $100 million just in January alone. And of course, I love in 2016, he was just irate at the conflicts of interest and that Secretary Clinton was getting a quarter of a million dollars for a speech. I mean, in this instance, he isn't even asking for donations. It's worse. He's asking for people to buy a volatile, unregulated coin that enriches him directly. And if I were Vladimir Putin, and if I get kicked out of Ukraine, it probably means at some point I get thrown out of a window. I mean, people who lose power in Russia, it usually doesn't end well for them. And I'm spending 60 to $100 billion a year on this failed war effort. I'm losing. I've lost almost a young men sending them into this meat grinder, which at some point has got to take a toll on the morale and the popularity. Wouldn't he be just stupid to figure out a secure way, maybe using signal on a phone to call the President, say, all right, price discovery is dictated at the margin. Right. If the Trump coin has a $7 billion market cap, you might be able to take it to 10 or 15 billion with just 100 million, 500 million, a billion in purchases. Right. What if you said to him, look, I can make this thing. I really love the Trump coin, and I'm going to make sure that for at least five years until you're well out of office, that this thing never. Or that at some point it's at least worth 50 billion and your stake is 80%. So you're about to become the richest man in the world. President Trump, just because I love the coin. And in unrelated news, how do you feel about cutting support to Ukraine? Wouldn't Putin, One, wouldn't Putin be stupid not to make that call and make that offer? And two, wouldn't it be logical, wouldn't it be the next point in the data pattern in the line for Trump to act on that call? I mean, he started a meme coin. What do you think he did it for? And the notion that he wouldn't be subject to this sort of influence, it just doesn't. Look at the, the corruption and the trail of bankrupt companies, the trail of unpaid subcontractors. And I'm incredibly disappointed the Democrats aren't putting up a better fight. I can't believe they're not all over the press today talking about all the different scenarios for the Trump coin and how this is not but pure grift.

[Ed Mylett]

Let's move on to Boeing and Boeing's earnings. They had actually a really good earnings report. Revenue up 18% to 19 and a half billion dollars. Deliveries up nearly 60%. They've also reduced their cash burn down to 2.3 billion. A year ago it was 4 billion. And there was a really big pop in the stock here. I think it was a great report. I think we're really surprised. To the upside, though, and what the markets are pricing in here was how optimistic Boeing was and their CEO was Kelly Ortberg about the tariff environment. Because, you know, meanwhile, you've got all these other companies that are somewhat freaking out about the tariffs. 40% of earnings calls so far this quarter have mentioned the word recession, which is unbelievable, by the way. 90% of them have mentioned the word tariff. And you actually called this, you said that tariffs was going to be the new AI on earnings calls. That is what's happening. But he did not seem that concerned about these tariffs. And he was asked up front, you know, what about China? China is your second largest market in aviation. Are you concerned about that. And he didn't seem phased. And if I had to paraphrase his response, it would be, we're watching it, but we'll be okay. And then he had this line where he said that 2025 would be Boeing's, quote, turnaround year. So very optimistic. I think what that tells you is that he and Boeing believe that these tariffs, particularly on China, are going away. And we'll discuss more what's happened in terms of tariffs and how Trump appears to be caving. But it is interesting that these earnings came out before we heard those comments from Trump. And so it appears that Boeing, in my view, had some sort of inside knowledge or at least some inside feeling that, yeah, these China tariffs, they look very scary, but ultimately we're not too worried about it. How else would they not be worried about it if they didn't have some inkling or some real sense that these tariffs wouldn't be going through?

[Scott Galloway]

I mean, one of two things has happened. Either he called the Boeing CEO and said, don't worry, don't worry, boss. Hey, do you want to come to my crypto meeting? Don't worry, right? We know you're a great company. Don't worry. And, you know, let me put out a press release saying you're hiring more people. Just don't, don't be critical of your earnings call, obviously, or the Boeing CEOs just said, this guy's full of shit. Nothing's going to happen here. Could be that we make great planes. Airbus, I mean, the thing about this is a duopoly controlled by two companies, Airbus in Boeing. And even if Airbus, for a time being, makes a better plane, as the global economy grows and demographics grows, there's always a need for more commercial aircraft, and no one of them can produce enough. So it really is a duopoly. And they have incredible pricing power. And these are just incredible companies. And I think what he's decided is, okay, this is a fucking distraction. And his earnings seem to cement that. And while China's threatened to reduce their order book, I would bet the order book that the Chinese, the CCP, and the people of Boeing, who are very smart and hire former ambassadors, have all said to each other, look, there's a non zero probability, a most likely opportunity, that the order book and the way we do business is going to stay exactly the same.

[Ed Mylett]

What we're seeing with a lot of these big corporate CEOs, companies like Target companies like Walmart, companies like, you know, other companies in defense like GE, Aerospace, many of these CEOs are meeting with the White House, they're meeting with the president. And they're coming out of those meetings appearing to be a lot calmer. And in fact, this was reported by Charles Gasparino at Fox Business. The administration at the White House is actually actively alerting Wall street executives. They're reaching out and telling them that they are nearing agreements on these trade deals, which is a very interesting dynamic that we're now entering into a market and a world where actually the heads of the largest corporations and the heads on Wall street, they're getting a heads up and they're able to front run the largest news item of our time. You could say, you know, that this has happened in the past, but I don't think at the level that we're seeing today. You know, usually it would be that with very highly sensitive economic data like this, there is a protocol and the White House comes out and they publicly announce it. And you give markets an equal time, an equal footing to react to what is happening. But it appears that there's such a level of disorganization in the White House and they're so freaked out by how the markets are reacting, it feels as if what is happening is the administration is having no choice but to call the big dogs of the Fortune 500 and say, hey, hey, just don't worry about it. It's going to be okay. And that's a material information right there. I mean, that is ground zero for insider trading that hasn't actually happened yet. But we all know that the line between fair trading versus insider trading is very blurry. And we are in an incredibly blurry time right now. And we'll, we'll, we'll talk more about that in our main story when we really focus on these tariffs. Let's just move on to this new data on wealth inequality. The top 19 households minting $1 trillion in wealth last year, biggest single year increase in history, they now own those top 19 households now own 1.8% of the entire household wealth in America. That's up from 0.1% in 1982, by the way. The bottom 50% of Americans, they own 3% of the household wealth. So you got half of America with 3% and the top 19 households with 1.8%. There are now 1,990 billionaires in America, and that number is up 45% since 2021, just four years ago. So we talk a lot about income inequality and also wealth inequality on this podcast. And here we have some new data which is just telling Us the same thing. We are a massively unequal society.

[Scott Galloway]

Well, to stick to the moral argument, it's bad for the economy. And that is when all of that prosperity is being crowded into the 0.01 percent1. I don't think they have as much of a vested interest in public infrastructure and the well being and prosperity of America. Do they have a vested interest in our healthcare system? No. Do they even have a vested interest in our national security? Because at the end of the day they can peace out to New Zealand or Dubai or London. So you're essentially creating a superclass of people that control so much economics and have so much power over our government, but don't exercise the power in a means that affects all of America because they've basically become sequestered from America and what's good or what's bad about it? They're literally behind gilded gates. And at some point, and I don't think they believe this, at some point people show up with pitchforks and lanterns, right? But if you think about third world nations that never able to get out of the way and ultimately end up in revolution, they have what's the common feature across all of them? Crazy income inequality. So this is, this is not only bad for the economy, it's bad, it's really damaging for our culture. And what you see here is that young people are increasingly disillusioned with America. More than four in 10 young Americans today under 30 say they're barely getting by financially, while just 16%, one in six young people say they're doing well or very well. One in six young Americans, the wealthiest country in the world, say they're doing well or very well. Now some of that is probably a benchmarking problem where they think if they're not on a Gulf Stream or in St. Barts, they're failing. But still some of that is real. They have less money. Fewer than half feel a sense of community with only 17% reporting deep social connection. That is really sad. Now is income inequality driving all of this? No. But I've said on this show for a long time that the majority of what ails America can either be reverse engineered or partially correlated to massive income inequality.

[Ed Mylett]

I think the reason that we're talking about this and the reason that this is important and it relates to our discussions of markets, it also has a place in the world of politics. I really believe that this is the defining issue of our time and of this generation. I think this is the most important thing that we're going to see and that I'm going to be grappling with for probably the rest of my life. And I was just thinking, you're talking about the 0.1%, the 99% there. You sound a lot like Bernie Sanders. And this is what people used to make fun of Bernie for. And I think back to the Occupy Wall street days, where actually it was the same issues that were on the table, and it was the same things that people were upset about and that people were protesting against. And you had people like Bernie who talked about the issues, but who, over time, were kind of written off by the establishment. Many sort of wrote him off as a quack or a little crazy or a socialist or a communist. But one stat I would point you to, which blew me away. Last week, Bernie Sanders and AOC held a rally in California and 36,000 people showed up. Just for comparison, a Trump rally is, on average around 5,000 people. The Madison Square Garden rally, that was 20,000 people. This was 36,000 people. And the message from those two candidates or those two politicians is simply about inequality. That's the whole thing. And it's just so fascinating that 10, 15 years ago, when Occupy Wall street was at its peak, people were saying, this is a big problem. It's only gotten worse.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah, it's gotten much worse.

[Ed Mylett]

It's gotten way worse.

[Scott Galloway]

Which says to me, we need a new framing. And that is. I think it's inspiring that AOC and Bernie are able to turn out these many people. There's definitely a groundswell of dissatisfaction. I think it was more inspired by some of the illegal seizure of the constitutional power, the idea that people are being rounded up effectively, some of the corruption, people being fired in sort of a reckless and cruel manner. I don't know if this was directly about income inequality, but that's sort of Bernie's talk track. I would reframe it because sometimes I think he comes across. I think the class warrior rap hasn't really resonated, per your comments. It continues to get worse. I think the framing should be something along the lines of the following. And that is the greatest innovation in history was not the iPhone or the semiconductor. It was the American middle class. It's created more tax revenue, it's fought wars, it's funded everything from the iPhone to vaccines. The American middle class is the greatest innovation in history. Now, how did it happen? It happened because 7 million men returned from war and they demonstrated heroism. They were fit, and we put a bunch of money in their pockets. We had the National Highway Transportation Act. We had FHA loans, we had the GI Bill and we made them very attractive to women. So they mated, had the baby boom. And then we took a lot of that money and that prosperity from these households that were very productive. We taxed it at a fair rate, including corporations that were sometimes paying 40 and 50%, the super wealthy that were sometimes paying 70, 80 and 90%. And we not only reinvested continually in the middle class, but we said we need to invite more people who've been sequestered from this prosperity into the fold. And we had legislation that advanced the rights of women and of non whites and we built the greatest society in history. And it all started from a really robust middle class. And it's like well okay, that's fine, you got me there. Most people would agree, Republicans and Democrats, where sometimes we differ in opinion, is that Republicans or the super wealthy will try and convince you that the middle class is a self healing organism that happens on its own, or that if you let the most productive people in the world, that is the super rich, do their thing unfettered, that the value they create will trickle down to the middle class. We have so much data showing that just doesn't work. And I think we need to come out of the closet and say you have to redistribute income from corporations and from the wealthy to the middle class in the form of education, child tax credit, a truly progressive tax system, maybe young people under the age of 40 or anyone that makes less than $100,000 plays 10%, anyone that makes over a an alternative minimum tax of 40%. And here's the thing about taxes, you wouldn't need to, you could lower the tax rates if you enforce them. It's the tax code where everybody gets fucked. And until we acknowledge that the middle class is not a self healing organism and there needs to be redistribution from corporations and the super wealthy to the middle class, it's just going to continue to go sideways and wither. And actually the middle class hasn't declined if you will, but it's been static relative to the unbelievable prosperity that's been crammed into the top 1%. And then you lay on top of that social media which is basically an orgy of the life of the top 0.1%. So that's the new benchmark. And what you end up with is people who see prosperity everywhere but aren't participating it unless they're in the top 0.1%, which leads to an obese, angry, depressed, anxious younger generation. So all of this is on a downward spiral. Focused on not only prosperity being crammed into the 0.1%, but that prosperity being rubbed in everyone's face face. And if people under the age of 40 in the most prosperous nation in history don't feel confident enough that they can form a household and have a kid, then none of this matters.

[Ed Mylett]

We'll be right back after the break with a look at Trump's policy reversals. If you're enjoying the show so far, be sure to give the Prof. G Markets feed a follow wherever you get your podcasts.

[Scott Galloway]

Foreign Comes from the Funrise Flagship Fund Real estate investing is boring now. Prediction markets, on the other hand, or even the stock market, which can swing wildly on a headline. Those will keep you on the edge of your seat. But with real estate investing, there's no drama or adrenaline or excuses to refresh your portfolio every few minutes. Just bland and boring stuff, including diversification and dividends. So you won't be surprised to learn the Fundrise Flagship Real Estate Fund is a complete snooze fest. The fund holds $1.1 billion worth of institutional caliber real estate managed by a team of pros focused on steadily growing your net worth for decades to come. See? Boring. And that's the point. You can start investing in minutes and with as little as $10 by visiting fundrise.com carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fundrise Flagship Fund before investing. Find this information and more in the funds [e-mail] Flagship this is a paid ad. Support for the show comes from Mercury, the banking product that feels extraordinary to use when you're a startup founder. Getting your business off the ground. The last thing you want to be doing is toggling between a dozen apps and clunky banking services that can barely keep up with your needs. Enter Mercury. Mercury is the banking product made by entrepreneurs for entrepreneurs. What makes it so special? Well, Mercury isn't technically a bank. They provide banking services through partner banks and are able to focus on delivering well designed software that helps navigate some of the tedium for you. Because when your finances are simple, your mind is free to focus on the real work of growing your business. With Mercury, you get the tools you need to operate at your best, scale your business and keep your spend under control. Visit mercury.com to join over 200,000 entrepreneurs who use Mercury to do more for their business. Mercury Banking that does more Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services provided by Choice Financial Group, Column NA and Evolve bank and Trust members FDIC the IO card is issued by Patriot bank member FDIC pursuant to a license from MasterCard. Support for the show comes from public.com all right. If you're serious about investing, you need to know about public.com that's where you can invest in everything stocks, options, bonds and more. They even offer some of the highest yields in the industry, including the bond account 6% or higher yield that remains locked in even if the Fed cuts rates. With Public, you can get the tools you need to make informed investment decisions. Their built in AI tools called Alpha doesn't just tell you if an asset is moving, it tells you why the asset is moving so you can actually understand what's driving your portfolio performance. Public is a a FINRA registered SIPC insured US based company with a customer support team that actually cares. Bottom line, your investments deserve a platform that takes them as seriously as you do. Fund your account in five minutes or [e-mail] profg and get up to $10,000 when you transfer your old portfolio. That's public.com profg paid for by Public Investing. All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for U.S. listed revenue securities, options and bonds in a self directed account are offered by Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC. Complete disclosures [e-mail] disclosures I should also disclose I am an investor in Public.

[Ed Mylett]

We'Re back with property markets. A clear pattern is emerging in Trump's policymaking. Bold declarations followed by abrupt reversals. After posting on Truth Social that Fed Chair Jerome Powell's quote, termination cannot come fast enough, Trump later told reporters that he had, quote, no intention of firing Powell. Similarly, after implementing a 145% tariff on Chinese imports, he's now saying that the level of tariffs could, quote, come down substantially. He also is planning to exempt car parts from those tariffs and the tariffs on steel and aluminum. On Wednesday, all three major indices initially jumped. However, they pulled back from their morning highs when Scott Besant clarified that Trump hadn't offered to remove the tariffs on China unilaterally. Still, The NASDAQ closed 2 1/2% higher, the S&P 500 was up 3%, and the Dow rose more than 1%. Scott, you've predicted that Trump would walk back on many of these issues. It seems like that is happening. What is your take on this?

[Scott Galloway]

The only thing two things you have to remember in a negotiation are one, not to make it personal. Don't make it win, lose, don't create emotion on either side. That's going to, you know, if you act like an asshole. People don't want to do a deal with you. They want to hurt you in the negotiation. They're not inclined to cut you a break or want to get a deal done. And then the second thing is always show a credible willingness to walk away. He imposed in what was the ultimate little dick energy movement. They raise their, they keep matching and he keeps going. And he went to 145. And then he says those tariffs are too high and will clearly come down. Okay? You raise them to this point and then a week later say they're clearly too high and they need to come down. You're the one that put this shit in. So my prediction all along is going to be the OR has been that after all of this noise and damage to our brand is done, the global tariff system other than world trade, that'll be inspired across strange bedfellows because we've got them to start speaking and cooperating. But the US Tariff complex or structure across the world will look strikingly similar to the way it looked before we started this bullshit nonsense. And all we have done is alienated people and massively reduced our goodwill and our brand equity. The weird thing is this guy is such a fucking toxic narcissist. I think he enjoys this shit. He doesn't care because he's going to make a billion plus dollars in his Trump meme coin. And he just wants to be the center of attention every day. It's like when my youngest used to act out and be a total asshole. And you realize, okay, they're acting out because they want attention. I mean, this guy is acting out every day. I think he would threaten nuclear war if he were out of the news cycle long enough and wanted desperately back in regardless of the damage.

[Ed Mylett]

So he made. He's walking everything back, right? And one thing that I think has been interesting has been China's response. You saw this hashtag that went viral in China, which was Trump chickened out. So however it is positioned by this administration, the message that the public has received and the message that China received is that he blinked. As you predicted, he folded, he caved, he chickened out, however you want to call it. And I think the question is, okay, what does it mean for markets that that's how the world perceives us? I mean, initially, the markets reacted quite positively, right? I mean, The Dow rose 1%. The S&P was up 2%. Nasdaq up 2.5%. I think they're pricing in some positivity that Trump is walking back the craziness, whether it comes to the tariffs on China, the tariffs on the auto industry, or his threats to the chair of the Federal Reserve. But I do think it's also important to keep in mind the damage that has still been done since Liberation Day, since April 2nd. Since that day, the Nasdaq is down more than 5%. The S&P is down more than 5%. The Dow is down more than 6%. The yield has risen more than 20 bips. It's at around 4.4% right now. So I think the question is, okay, what are the markets telling us? Yes, the tariffs are likely to be, if not reversed, significantly reduced. But what are they pricing in right now that is worse than pre Liberation Day? And I think the answer is probably just the damage that we have done to our brand and our reputation as a safe economy, as a reliable trade partner, et cetera. And there were some comments from Ken Griffin which I thought were particularly telling and I think he actually put it quite well. And you remember Ken Griffin, founder, CEO of Citadel. This is a guy who is a Trump supporter. He donated a million dollars to Trump's inauguration fund. He donated 100 million to the Republican superbacs in the last election cycle. He's pretty much a MAGA guy. He said, quote, the U.S. is more than a nation, it's a brand. And we are eroding that brand right now. And I think that's right. And I think that brand erosion is what's being reflected in the stock markets and the bond markets right now. They had a little bit of an uptick, but ultimately you look since that date, since Liberation Day, we're still way down. And I think the question is, is this reversible? Is it too late or is the damage already done?

[Scott Galloway]

Well, I was thinking he listened to this show, we've been talking about that the long term damage here is to the erosion in our brand equity which decreases our margin and in millions of different ways that we'll never know directly. I think our allies are just less likely to share information with us. I think someone who is asked to deliver weapons to what might be a terrorist, less likely to call the American embassy and say, hey, I saw this. I think people are less likely to send their best and brightest to the US when PhD students are being sent errant emails asking to self deport and those types of injuries. It's like having a high blood pressure just at some point it creates an opportunity set or a corpus that is just more prone to bad things to happen to that person. And that's what's essentially he's giving us really high cholesterol or high blood pressure, making us more vulnerable to opportunistic infections. Can it be repaired? Sure. I mean, we've had really dark moments in our history. I think a Democratic or a different Republican in the White House and maybe even some learning that comes out of this and seeing Americans kind of rise up and realize that their rights are not foregone conclusions and then leveraging the democratic process to change direction. I think our allies will forgive us. I think we have a longer history with them than that. And that's the real damage. The damage and the opportunity is that to tear up 80 year alliances and erode that goodwill is just stupid. And it's sort of been something we've taken for granted. The good news, the good news is I think a lot of that ill will has been ring fenced to one man. This guy will go down as the stupid presidency. It used to be coarseness and cruelness, but he had a certain feel for the markets. People thought he was a good business person. The markets did do well during his first term. You know, a lot of people from different cohorts did. Did well. Now granted, did we spend $7 trillion in additional deficits or $8 trillion? Yeah. But it would be hard to punch too many holes in the economic record of his first administration. Now this one is just seems like, okay, how do we go out is just really stupid. But I absolutely think we can repair this. And I think the upside is that a lot of the OL is not towards America, it's towards one individual.

[Ed Mylett]

Yeah. I think we're sort of in a race against China to get the world on our side. And I think I'm with you. I think people would be faster to renormalize relations with the US than they would with China. But having said that, China is trying. I mean they just lifted these sanctions on the eu. They just sent their trade delegations to Sweden, to Hungary, to Norway, to Germany. They are certainly trying to rekindle those relationships. And I think for U.S. investors and U.S. companies, the question is, can we normalize our relationships with other nations faster than China can? I think we probably can, but it's four years. So we're definitely running against the clock here. And that is going to have a massive impact on US markets, especially given what we've seen with the global rotation and the capital flows that are leaving America and as we discussed last week, entering back into Europe. So that's probably the question. And we'll see that's all I'll say on that. We'll be right back after the break with a look at Tesla's earnings. And if you're enjoying the show so far, hit follow and leave us a review on the Prof. G Markets feed.

[Scott Galloway]

Support for the show comes from Gruhns. If you're looking for a new tasty nutrition solution, then look no further than Gruyns. It's a convenient, comprehensive formula packed into eight gummies a day. Grunds isn't a multivitamin, a greens gummy or a prebiotic. It's all of those things and then some at a fraction of the price price. Their daily packs contain eight gummies because you just can't fit the amount of nutrients they do just into one gummy. Generic multivitamins only contain around seven to nine vitamins, but Grunds have more than 20 vitamins and minerals plus more than 60 whole food ingredients. They actually provided us with a bit of science to explain what makes grunds different. Basically, 30% of the population has a gene that messes with how they absorb vitamins. But Gruns is methylated, which is a fancy way of saying their vitamins like B12 and folate can be absorbed by your body. Methylating is an expensive option for a lot of other companies, but Grunds is looking out for you. Plus they're vegan and free of nuts, dairy and gluten, and they're made with no artificial colors or flavors. Get up to 45% off when you go to Gruns Co and use code Prof. G that's G R u n s.co using code Prof. G for 45% off. Support for Propig comes from Upwork. Starting a new business is exciting. You've had an idea, you've planned it all out, You've gotten it launched. It's going well. But then you run into something you don't know how to do yourself and can't do alone. That can be a challenging moment, but it happens to every single entrepreneur. Upwork is here to help companies at every stage turn to upwork to get things done. Upwork helps you access a global marketplace filled with top talent in it, web development, AI design, admin support, marketing, and more. Posting a job on Upwork is easy. There's no cost to join, you can register, browse, freelancer profiles, get help drafting a post, or even book a consultation. From there, you connect with the perfect freelancer for your needs. Upwork makes the entire process easier, simpler, and more affordable with industry low fees. Post a job today and hire tomorrow with Upwork, visit Upwork.com right now and post your job here for free. That's Upwork.com to post your job for free and connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's upwork.com upwork.com support for the show comes from LinkedIn. While the latest technology, gadgets and algorithms can be useful for your small business, at the end of the day, the most important thing is still the quality of people you hire. LinkedIn wants you to feel confident that you're hiring the best. Based on LinkedIn's data, 72% of SMBs using LinkedIn say that it helped them find a high quality candidate. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free. Share it with your network and get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. And LinkedIn's new features can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people with deep candidate insights. They say you can even add a hiringframe to your profile picture and get two times more qualified candidates. Either post your job for free or pay to promote promoted jobs. Get three times more qualified applicants. Find out why more than two and a half million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at LinkedIn.com Prof. That's LinkedIn.com Prof. To post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.

[Ed Mylett]

We're back with ProfG Markets. Tesla's first quarter results fell short across the board, missing expectations on the top and bottom lines. Net income plunged 71% year over year and automotive revenue fell 20%. Overall revenue dropped 9%. Still, the stock jumped 5% in after hours trading. Part of the lift came from the broader market rally we just discussed, but investors were also encouraged after Elon pledged to significantly reduce the time he spends on Doge and he promised to refocus his efforts on Tesla starting next month. Scott, I listened in on the call. I have a number of observations, but first, just your take on these quarterly results as well as Elon's decision to step back from Doge.

[Scott Galloway]

First off, let me just go to how incredibly cynical it is for Elon Musk to show up to the government with a chainsaw, the chainsaw for bureaucracy.

[Ed Mylett]

Chainsaw.

[Scott Galloway]

And then shut off $75 billion in USAID going to people struggling with malaria in Myanmar or soup kitchens in war torn Ukraine. And his company would have been unprofitable had it not been for him reselling carbon credits.

[Ed Mylett]

They were saved by the regulatory credits this Quarter.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah, I mean, get this. Its Automotive revenue declined 20% year on year. I can't name an automobile company, maybe at some point Jeep or I think Jaguar had a rough couple years that has declined 20% year on year.

[Ed Mylett]

Staggering.

[Scott Galloway]

So this company is declining faster than any automobile company in America. You know, I bet, I don't know, Ford was probably at 4 or 6%, I'm guessing single digits. These guys are down 20% while reducing prices. Their top track has always been, we're really not a car company, we're a software company, we're an energy company. But even if you. Okay, fine, if we're a car company, because we're all EVs, we have dramatically fewer parts, we're able to have a much more robust supply chain, much more efficient production and assembly schedule. And we're the most American made company, we're the most vertical, we own our dealerships. We don't have this weird thing with the local billionaire or the local, the guy who used to be a quarterback for Alabama or whatever, opening a bunch of dealerships. And Teslas to their credit, are actually the most American made production. The majority of products, or parts, which is dramatically fewer that go into a Tesla are sourced in America. All of this adds up to operating margins that were remarkable for the industry of 20%. But the automobile industry is a business of scale. When you buy a Porsche Cayman, is that the SUV, an Audi Q7 or a Volkswagen Touareg? You're buying the same car, they're off the same platform. These platforms are so expensive to build and maintain that you have to shove a ton of throughput across these assembly lines. And then in the case of The Touareg, the Q7 and the Cayenne, the last 10% of the assembly line, they take three different routes and they put in nicer finishes and nicer leather and nicer badging. And they charge different prices and different, they market them different, differently in different, different ad campaigns, different value propositions. Right. But if you don't have the scale, it is an impossible industry, as evidenced by Rivian, that makes a great car. They have to sell for $80,000 even though it's costing them $120,000 to produce these things. And until they produce 3x the number, they're never going to get to profitability. So when Tesla's Automobile revenues decline 20%, it's exponentially bad to descale in the automotive industry because those assembly lines are not registering a decrease in costs, even though you have less throughput as a Result, their operating margins have gone from 20% to 2.1. So their operating margins have declined 90%, yet the stock was up 5%. And this is a company that is technically unprofitable. They've also lost their leadership position. Volkswagen overtook Tesla as a top EV seller in Europe, and registrations for VW EVs increased 150%, while Tesla registrations dropped 38%. And yet he is able to take the stock up 5% by saying, I am going to focus more on Tesla. We still have this idolatry of innovators. We're still under the belief that him spending more time at Fremont, at Tesla, is somehow going to turn this company around. So I just think it's a case study in meme stocks and how storytelling and our idolatry of innovators has resulted in an irrational market where the stock price begins to absolutely disassociate from the fundamentals, which I guess is the definition of a meme stock. What are your thoughts, Ed?

[Ed Mylett]

Yeah, I think I agree with all that. I mean, just some observations from the earnings call. I think my number one takeaway is that if he's trying to convince investors that Tesla is fine, which he needs to do, I think he did a really bad job of it. Having said that, the market appears to disagree with me because the stock jumped. And I think a lot of your meme stock explanation might be part of it. But what I heard on that earnings call was a CEO who is panicked, who is confused, and who is, most importantly, in a state of denial. And I will explain what I mean there. But the first thing to note is his opening remarks, which were a monologue about Doge and how important the work he's doing at Doge is. And if you're trying to convince investors that you care more about Tesla, your company, than you do about Doge, you should probably start the earnings call by talking about Tesla. Instead, he goes on about Doge and how he's saving America by cutting wasteful spending. Then he addresses the Tesla protests, which I credit him. He should. It's a huge problem for the company. But he makes this wild claim that the real reason people are protesting Tesla isn't because of any of his actions or any of his comments or the fact that he saluted a crowd in what very much appeared to be a Nazi salute. He didn't acknowledge any of that. He said the reason that people are protesting Tesla is because they're upset that Elon is, through Doge, restricting their ability to get government handouts. I mean, he really said this. He said, those protesters, they're all receiving these wasteful and fraudulent dollars from the government. And it's because, because of Elon, they're angry. They're not gonna get this free money anymore. Which is just an insane claim that completely disregards what is actually happening to the company and its brand. And it's an extremely important thing to address. I mean, this 20% drop off in revenue, it's almost entirely to do with the brand damage. So you have to be upfront about it and you have to engage with that issue honestly. He was then asked directly about the brand damage by one of the analysts and asked, what does this brand damage mean, or these rumors of brand damage, what does it mean for the company? And on that occasion, he completely deflects and he starts going on about the macro environment, which didn't make any sense at all. He said, I'll quote him, quote. Yeah, I mean, Tesla is immune to sort of the macro demand for cars. So when there's economic uncertainty, people generally want to pause on buying. But as far as absent macro issues, we don't see any reduction in demand. Doesn't make sense. And also, it's completely not true. There is obviously a reduction in demand. Your sales fell 20%. My favorite line there came when he was trying to assuage investors that Tesla is in fact, okay. And the way he does that, he's talking about how Tesla has had struggles in the past, how they've faced issues, which is all true. And then he says, quote, we are not on the ragged edge of death. Not even close. That, to me, that tells me that Elon is thinking about this thing called the ragged edge of death. I mean, I knew Tesla's situation was bad. I didn't think it was that bad. But if Elon's saying that, if he's thinking about it, or if he at least thinks that other people are saying it. Well, now I'm certainly considering the possibility that Tesla is, quote, on the ragged edge of death. Cause he just put it in my brain. So I thought this was some of the worst investor relations I've seen. Clearly the market disagrees with me, and fair enough. But my takeaway is, yes, Elon's back, kind of. He said he's still going to spend one to two days a week at Doge. So he's kind of back, but he's clearly, in my view, still in a state of delusion and total denial. And I think he did a terrible job of disproving that.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah, I mean, this just Calls on so many themes we've sort of beaten to death. Poor governance. No CEO would be allowed to do this. And just. I can't help but take the bait. If DOGE was an attempt to audit a $7 trillion enterprise, I can't think of a single enterprise of $1 trillion that would be issued such a clean bill of health as DOGE has accidentally, unintentionally, much to their disappointment, issued around the federal government.

[Ed Mylett]

They.

[Scott Galloway]

First they said they were going to save $2 trillion, then 150 billion. It looks like it's about 60 to 65, although that can't be verified. And they just. And where's the fraud? You know, Pam Bondi's ready to take a call in from Elon Musk and go after some federal employee who's been stealing. They're all ginned up to do that and announce it. This is a clean bill of health, or as clean a bill of health as you could hope for. Now, some people would say that's incompetence on the part of the auditors. But his board, if he had a real board, they would have called him and said, look, if you want to go play in traffic as a advisor to the president, that's your business, but you can't be CEO of this company. And also, why are you doing this? You're really hurting us. So I don't. This is just sort of new territory here. The market seems to believe that he's going to be able to create some of that magic pixie dust. How does Tesla come back a lot like America? I think the rumors of Tesla's brand death have been greatly exaggerated. I think if they came up with two or three amazing products in the next three to five years, it's like, we love you again. I think Americans still value product over, you know, great value products over anything else.

[Ed Mylett]

Agreed.

[Scott Galloway]

So it could absolutely come back. Whether they have those in the pipeline, I don't know.

[Ed Mylett]

That's the question. That's the bull case. And those products are. And they said this on the call, it's the robo taxi and it's the humanoid robot, the Optimus robot. And I think the other explanation for the reaction from the stock market is that they did say that they are on track for the Robotaxi pilot launch in Austin in June, which is what the market has been waiting for. So according to them, it's going to happen. I think I believe them at this point. The question is, what does a pilot launch actually mean? Like, is it a fake PR event? Like we saw last year in LA with the Cyber Cab show. Is it just one or two cabs rolling around and you have to book like months in advance or does it mean you can actually go to Austin, you can open your phone and order a ride in Tesla just like you could a Waymo in San Francisco. And that's the question. One thing that made me a little bit bearish is that Elon's response to what it would look like. He said, quote, we're still debating the exact number to start off on, on day one, but it's like, I don't know, maybe 10 or 20 vehicles on day one. So 10 or 20, I thought that was a pretty low number. And given he has a track record of over promising and underdelivering, I could see it being even lower than that. You compare it to waymo, which has 700 vehicles operating on the ground right now. But that's the question. It's like, do we think the robotaxi is going to be legit or not? That's the opportunity. My view, let's just wait and see. I mean, why buy this company if you don't know what you're actually buying? I mean, people say, oh, it's a robotaxi company, it's an AI company, it's a humanoid robot company. Well, okay, show me the robot. Show me one taxi ride, ship, one ride and I'll believe you. But they haven't generated a single dollar off of this yet. And so until they can do that, yeah, I'm not buying and I'm not going to have an argument with you about whether this is a car company or not. As of today, April 2025, it's a car company whose sales are down 20%. That's what it is.

[Scott Galloway]

Waymo is, I think, going to be in 10 or 11 cities, including Tokyo by the time Tesla hits Austin. So what is the competitive. Okay, we'll believe you this time. You said in 2017 it was a year away. That didn't happen. We'll believe you this time. And 2010, what is your advantage when you have Waymo is out there with cars and they're launching in the biggest cities and then launching globally. How are you going to compete? Or is this just going to be a race to the bottom? Or is there?

[Ed Mylett]

His response is it's cheaper that Teslas are less expensive and that's their advantage, which I'll take. But even until then, ship the product.

[Scott Galloway]

Okay, but that's one of two things. That's either you have scale software that's better once the fixed investment is made. I don't. It's all about. In software, it's about they're driving the same goddamn car, is approximately the same dollar volume, how would it be? It would have to be scale. Which means they would take a penetration strategy and lose a shit ton of money. And Alphabet has a much bigger balance sheet. I don't see how they're going to sustain. I mean Alphabet or Waymo will match their price whatever Tesla claims they're saying. And given that Tesla does not have the most profitable toll booth in the world, that is Google, to subsidize that market share or penetration strategy. I just. They're going up against. They're a squirt gun against a bazooka when they're talking about capital and scale.

[Ed Mylett]

Exactly.

[Scott Galloway]

Unless Alphabet says after all of this money and all this time and establishing market leadership, we're just going to give it up because Elon's decided to engage in a price war. They're going to say, fuck you, bring it on. And then these robots, God, I mean, everybody has to put something crazy out there, I think, to get people excited. Fine. The concept cars you see at auto shows, none of them are going to be in the showroom. And I'm personally really excited to get home from work and ask my Tesla robot if it took the meat out of the freezer. I just can't wait for that moment. But robots, I just don't. I mean robots have huge commercial applications. It's called robotics and automation. But I don't. What is the use case for the robots? I just find the whole thing kind of, kind of comical.

[Ed Mylett]

They asked Elon about the humanoid robot asking a similar question. They said, could you confirm if it is currently operational? If so, what is the current production rate per week? And Elon said, quote, I want to emphasize Optimus is still very much a development program. So this is sort of the play with this. Just talk about it. And then when they ask for the specifics, just sort of delay and obfuscate. That's how he's handling it. But the market likes it.

[Scott Galloway]

We'll see.

[Ed Mylett]

Let's take a look at the week ahead. We'll see data on the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index for March and we'll also see earnings from Microsoft, Meta, Apple and Amazon. Scott, do you have any predictions?

[Scott Galloway]

Essentially, Donald Trump is about to get Mark Carney elected as Prime Minister of Canada. This was a foregone conclusion that he was going to lose. I'm not sure I'm saying as name Correct. But the conservative candidate, Polyevry I believe. I'm terrible at this. He was going to win. Trudeau was so unpopular and entering into this trade war and who. Mark Carney as current Prime Minister has been very kind of forcefully dignified. This will be the greatest comeback in probably political history. 25 points down at the turn of the year and it's all because of Trump. So anyways, my prediction and I interviewed Prime Minister Carney on the prop G pod has almost a million views I think on YouTube and he's very likable. He comes across as incredibly thoughtful, schooled in the us went to work for Goldman Stacks, was the first non Brit to head the bank of England. So he's incredibly.

[Ed Mylett]

Probably the best resume of all time in the world. Maybe.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah. It's just hard to argue with his credentials. And he's tall, he's handsome, you know, he's out of central casting and he's just handled this. He's what you would want from us. You would want someone forceful and dignified and not having an emotional reaction. But you know, saying this is not adequate for us. We look forward to re establishing relations but until that point we're obviously going to stand our ground anyways. Prediction is Trump is about to elect a guy who was 25 points down just four months ago. The next Prime Minister of Canada will be Mark Carney.

[Ed Mylett]

Are we political insiders in Canada then? If he wins, I expect to be.

[Scott Galloway]

Invited to at least a hockey game.

[Ed Mylett]

Okay, good. I want to tag along. Just CC me on the email.

[Scott Galloway]

He grew up in Edmonton, so he's an Oilers fan. So we're going to have to go all the way out there. Maybe we'll go for the Calgary Stampede or something. But yeah, he and I are good, good friends now. We're very close. Very close. I'm going to be the secretary of something in Canada.

[Ed Mylett]

Secretary of Hockey.

[Scott Galloway]

There you go.

[Ed Mylett]

How's that?

[Scott Galloway]

I like it. I'll take it.

[Ed Mylett]

This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Miel Silverio is our research lead. Isabella Kinsel is our research associate. Dan Shalon is our intern. Drew Burrows is our technical director and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer. Thank you for listening to Profgue Market from the Vox Media Podcast Network. Join us on Thursday for our conversation with Mark Mahaney only on Profge Markets.

[Scott Galloway]

Love at the Water and the LA.