Scott Galloway (1:40)

All right. In today's episode. In today's episode, we're gonna discuss Talarico gate, how the DOJ has only released 2% of the Epstein files and what it's still hiding and the future of ice. If you haven't already, please make sure to subscribe to our YouTube PA to get up to date coverage on everything happening. All right, let's get into it. James Talarico, the charismatic Texas state representative, was scheduled to be interviewed by Stephen Colbert on his show this past Monday night. But at the last minute, CBS told the host that the interview would not air and that he shouldn't talk about it on the show. Colbert called out FCC chair Brendan Carr by name. It's another case where corporate media is responding to Trump administration policies. Jess, what's your take here?

Jessica Tarleff (2:24)

Paging Ted Cruz. Remember how Ted Cruz was the voice of reason when this happened with Jimmy Kimmel just a few months ago. It feels like forever ago, but it was just a few months. They are obviously, you know, trying to run the same playbook. They attempted this with the View. Talarico was on the View a couple of weeks ago. And, you know, it's disappointing that corporate media keeps bending the knee. Corporate law firms, corporate me, anything with corporate in front of it seems to not be doing that well. Finding their spine in the Trump era. But I thought it was very well handled by Colbert. And, you know, I was one of the millions of people that immediately clicked that YouTube link and listened to the interview. And, you know, it gave them a bit of a badass sheen that two kind of arguably, you know, dorky guys like Stephen Colbert and James Talarico wouldn't normally have. But, you know, I think it's just another lesson in how things go during the Trump era. It will continue down this path and people need to continue to find their voice against it. I just, like, don't understand, though, why the Trump administration keeps committing these own goals. Right, because it's just going to drive people. I mean, I was going to watch James Tallarico no matter what. But there are a lot of people who wouldn't normally tune into Colbert who don't particularly care about James Talarico or even know what's going on in the Texas Senate primary on the Democratic side who are now more interested in him. So doesn't it just completely defeat the purpose of what they were trying to do in getting Talarico off the air?

Scott Galloway (3:59)

I can't imagine if there were a conspiracy here, it would be that the biggest funder of Talarico or the biggest proponent of the Talarico campaign planted someone at the FCC and convinced them to do this.

Jessica Tarleff (4:12)

Should we make Brendan Carr for Talarico T shirts?

Scott Galloway (4:16)

So, first off, let's talk about the losers. Paramount. CBS spiked a 60 Minute story. By the way, Anderson Cooper announced he's leaving 60 Minutes.

Jessica Tarleff (4:25)

That's so sad. 20 years.

Scott Galloway (4:27)

I'm name dropping right now. I know Anderson and I text him like, smart move. He spent 20 years there. It's built his brand. He did a great job. And leaving on his terms, absolutely the right thing to do. And it sends a very strong signal. An enterprising producer could probably call half the producers, it's 60 Minutes, and raise $50 million from a Democratic billionaire and say, I'm going to start something called, you know, 3600 seconds and basically reimagine 60 minutes like it used to be. I think that's a big opportunity. But Paramount, CBS keeps saying, oh, we're no longer an independent news network. We are the propaganda arm of the Trump administration and it's just not going to serve them well. And as evidence of that, the first week that they had their new anchor for CBS News, their viewership went from 5 million a night to 4. Now, I will say this, it's keeping CBS in the news, which is literally going from irrelevant to less than irrelevant. So they're in the news a lot, but for the wrong reasons. So Paramount, cbs, huge loser here. No doubt about it, the Trump administration cements the notion they don't believe in a free press, which only massively juices the viewership of this interview. The other loser, unfortunately, through no fault of our own, is Representative Crockett, who Talarico just got this wind in his sails where he's seen as this resistance fighter that everyone is so scared of. The empire has put out all sorts of hits on him, which makes him look like a bigger threat. And obviously Colbert is an enormous winner here because he continues to look like, you know, his hat is just starched bright white. But this was effectively, you know, this wasn't censorship, this was amplification. Brendan Carr just made Talarico famous in Texas. Talarico could have raised 20 or 30 million dollars. It wouldn't have done as much for his campaign as Brendan Carr just did.

Jessica Tarleff (6:23)

I like it. It's also an interesting contrast. You know, we just had the Munich Security Conference, and the right wing and Republican Party here is always bitching about censorship abroad, right. And how we're the bastion of free speech here.

Scott Galloway (6:40)

Free speech.

Jessica Tarleff (6:41)

And I'm pretty sure that there's stuff on TV in Germany and in England that Brendan Carr would have his panties in a bunch about here. It's super embarrassing on that front. And you just see, I mean, no matter what story we're covering and you know, we're going to talk about the Epstein files, we're going to talk about what's going on with immigration enforcement and ice. Just like tick down the lines of the Constitution and say, oh, guess this is irrelevant now. Oh, guess this is irrelevant now. Oh, guess this is irrelevant now. And it's such a huge opportunity for Democrats to come out and just be on the side of the Constitution, right? Like that. These are our core values, that speech is protected. And I mean, hiding behind the equal time rule is not going to get you anywhere. Since Jasmine Crockett has been on Colbert and I'm sure Stephen Colbert would welcome Ken Paxton onto the show. Could talk about his legislative career, also his affairs, or John Cornyn, who I think would have a much more successful interview. And he doesn't have any skeletons in his closet, as far as I know, but he doesn't want to have his feet held to the proverbial fire over the Trump administration's policies. So they're not interested in it. But this idea that, and this is why I started with paging Ted Cruz, that there's no slippery slope here, and I hope the Democrats always stand on the side of the Constitution. But there are going to be ruthless people out there that once the Democrats come back into power, are saying we should do exactly to them what they did to us and they wouldn't be wrong for it. And the Republicans that are speaking out at this moment saying, like, cool it, guys. You know, this is not a third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth term for Donald Trump in the hopper. Right. Like, there's a big chance that we're going to lose the midterm. This is me being them, not me being a Democrat. Lose the midterms, definitely the House, maybe. A lot of smart people think the Senate's in Play. And then 2028, not a foregone conclusion at all, especially if you have J.D. vance on top of the ticket. This is a very narrow way to be governing at this particular moment. And it's such a petty, small fight. What do you care about seven and a half minutes of Stephen Colbert talking to James Talarico about Christ? I mean, that's literally what they were talking about. Like that billionaires are bad and that it reduces the importance of Jesus to make him a political issue. That was the content that they were so afraid of.

Scott Galloway (9:04)

Yeah, I'm not comfortable calling the Trump administration fascists. That's the bad news. The good news is they're really fucking stupid fascists. They continue to make these sort of own goals that just nobody thought. If you type this into an LLM and say, what are the risks of the FCC chair trying to spike an interview with a Democratic Senate candidate? I mean, every LLM would come back and say, no, that's a stupid idea. So they get their tariff numbers from AI, but they don't bother to run this through. I can't imagine the PR executive or the strategist at the Trump administration saying, yeah, Colbert won't say anything. This won't right. This won't bring more heat and excitement.

Jessica Tarleff (9:53)

Colbert isn't even afraid of his own boss at this point. He's like, I have three months left to go. Like yolo.

Scott Galloway (9:59)

Colbert is going to. I mean, his show is ending. If they had just ignored Colbert, quite frankly, he just wouldn't be nearly as relevant right now because his show loses a lot of money. And this is a cap. You know, media companies are capitalist, but this comes across as I'm beating a dead horse here. Such extraordinary censorship. And I would imagine that a lot of moderate Republicans are gonna say. What'll be interesting is to see how many Republicans come out and say this was a bad move. Cuz it won't be a litmus test of their backbone. It'll be a litmus test of their assessment if whether Trump is losing popularity and losing a step. Because I find these guys start to find their testicles when they think there's less and less danger of a blowback from the Trump administration. It's sort of almost like a weakness indicator of whether they think that the Trump fever is about to break.

Jessica Tarleff (10:53)

Yeah, and it's also an easy one. You know what I mean? Like, you don't have to come out against his immigration policy if you just.

Scott Galloway (11:00)

Say, I believe in free speech.

Jessica Tarleff (11:01)

Let Talarico be on Colbert and air it on a regular network instead of it being a YouTube thing. But it is a good precursor for whatever YouTube show or podcast or whatever Colbert is going to be doing come May when he no longer has this job anymore. Though I feel like he should take a few months off at least. Everyone needs needs a break.

Scott Galloway (11:23)

All right, let's take a quick break. Stay with.

Framer Ad Narrator (11:30)

Support for today's show comes from Framer. Let's say your marketing team wants a new landing page so the design team mocks it up and then your engineering department, who's already got too much on their plate, responds with yeah, we'll get to it. Thousands of businesses from early stage startups to Fortune 500s are choosing to build their sites in Framer, where changes take minutes instead of days to solve this very problem. Framer's enterprise grade no code website builder used by teams at companies including Perplexity and Miro to move faster with real time collaboration. A robust with everything you need for great SEO and advanced analytics that include integrated A B testing, your designers and marketers are empowered to build and maximize your.com from day one. So whether you want to launch a new site, test a few landing pages or migrate your full.com framer has programs for startups, scale ups and large enterprises to make going from idea to live site as easy and as fast as possible.

Scott Galloway (12:23)

Learn how you can get more out.

Framer Ad Narrator (12:24)

Of your.com from a framer specialist or get started building for free today@framer.com propg for 30% off a Framer Pro annual plan. That's framer.com propg for 30 percent off framer.com propg rules and restrictions may apply.

Monday.com Ad Narrator (12:44)

It's time to level the up. I'm Robin Arson and I light fires. I'm an executive founder, bestselling author, ultramarathoner mother, proud Latina. And I'm not done yet. Announcing Project Swagger, my new weekly podcast, your transformation toolkit. I'm going to cut through the noise and give you actionable takeaways each week in under 30 minutes. Elevate your hustle with routines, strategies and mindset shifts that I have pressure tested. I have burnt down this Beyonce candle.

Jessica Tarleff (13:17)

Like all the way to the bottom.

Monday.com Ad Narrator (13:19)

We have been trying to manifest. Carbs are not the enemy. I probably have a piece of bread or a bagel with me at all times and I am not exaggerating. Tune in on February 24 for episode one, building the skill of Self Talk. This is the foundation. Follow Project Swagger wherever you get your podcasts. Let's go.

Scott Galloway (13:41)

Hi everyone.

Kara Swisher (13:42)

This week on on with Kara Swisher, I'm joined by the iconic actor and activist Jane Fonda.

Jessica Tarleff (13:47)

You've heard of her?

Kara Swisher (13:48)

Jane and I talked about her roots as an activist dating back to the 1970s when she was protesting the Vietnam War, to her ongoing fight for climate, free speech, and ultimately our democracy. Here's a taste of what she had to say.

Scott Galloway (14:02)

Hope is very different than optimism. You know, optimism is everything's going to.

Kara Swisher (14:07)

Be fine and you don't do anything about it.

Scott Galloway (14:12)

Hope is a muscle. Hope is when you fight, hope can be rage filled. Breaking down the door with a battering ram.

Kara Swisher (14:22)

This is a wonderful conversation. I am privileged to be able to talk to people like this. Jane Fonda is the bomb. She just is. She's always been that way. She remains that way. She will go down in history as that. You can listen to wherever you get your podcasts and search for us too on YouTube and be sure to follow on with Kara Swisher for more.

Scott Galloway (14:43)

Welcome back. The Justice Department says it's wrapped its final release of the Epstein files under the transparency law, but new reporting suggests the public has seen maybe just 2% of the total data seized. And already executives, politicians, academics, and even a sitting cabinet secretary are facing the threat of resignations, investigations and serious reputational damage. Jess, if this is Only a fraction of the evidence. Why is the DOJ saying they fulfilled the Epstein files transparency Act?

Jessica Tarleff (15:13)

Well, because they're lying, but that makes sense. Okay, Is that the end of the show?

Scott Galloway (15:17)

Yeah. There we go. Done. Correct.

Jessica Tarleff (15:19)

Ding, ding, ding. So the past couple of weeks, you know, I've been very down about this, which I think anyone who's consuming the news as it relates to the Epstein files would be. And you're, you know, horrified and sad. And it's so harrowing what happened to these victims and the frustration about so few people caring and there being consequences. And I felt for a couple weeks there that something was going to change. I'm not saying everybody was going to be prosecuted, but it did feel like there was some momentum. And seeing now that the DOJ is saying we're done, and you know, doing crazy things like releasing all the names involved, and then they put out, like, Janis Joplin on a list who was. Epstein was 17 when she passed away. And, you know, crowding names together like Joplin and Larry Nassar, for instance, you realize nothing's gonna happen. And I'm getting really sick of seeing headlines from around the world. Like last night, you know, breaking French police raid multiple locations in Jeffrey Epstein criminal probe, including the Arab World Institute. Right. You're having resignations of people out of foreign governments because they just in contact with this guy. Keir Starmer may not be the UK Prime Minister anymore over bad judgment as it relates to putting, you know, someone in. In government who was linked to him. And I just think, like, we're not going to do anything. Like, Brad Karp doesn't have his job anymore. I saw Casey Wasserman, the, you know, the mega agent stepping down. But it put Pam Bondi's performance last week in a new light to me. Like, I actually, I thought it was so bad and it was so embarrassing. Not just the stuff everyone's been making fun of. Like, you got asked a question about a pedophile and you scream Dao 50,000. Like, that's funny in an SNL sense. But I really thought that the image of this Attorney General not even turning around to make eye contact with the survivors, women who have endured something that no one should have to, would show Trump that she's not up to this job or that she was just gonna be enough of a PR nightmare that she should be gone. But honestly, like, looking at it now, a few days later, I think it's what Trump wanted. I think that he has made it clear and that Marjorie Taylor Greene has been talking about this in interviews, that he is the one who has been blocking this, and he told her to go out there and be as ridiculous as she needs to be as long as she is stonewalling. And so I have basically no faith in the idea that there will be any substantive consequences from this or that we're going to find out that much more. So that's. I don't want to be Debbie Downer, but that's where I am.

Scott Galloway (18:12)

I'm more hopeful in a sense that I do think there are going to be consequences here, but I think they're going to happen in 2029.

Jessica Tarleff (18:17)

Okay.

Scott Galloway (18:18)

And also, I think Democrats and Merrick Garland have to take some responsibility for why these files weren't released earlier, why there haven't been any indictments, why there hasn't been more aggressive push to get to the bottom of what's gone on here during Democratic administrations. What's come to light here is that the Republican Party, I mean, that. That was a real moment that you just referenced when Representative Jayapal asked the survivors or survivors to stand up. And all of them had reached out to the doj, and none of them. The DOJ has no interest in interviewing these victims.

Jessica Tarleff (18:51)

Yeah.

Scott Galloway (18:51)

I mean, you'd think that one, they would provide insight into crimes and possibly even exonerate some people. But it's clear it's no longer the Department of Justice, it's the Department of Delay and Obfuscation. And if you were to. Quite frankly, I think someone did type this into AI and said these in some form are going to come out in some format. What's the best way to do it? They said, confuse the shit out of everyone, release a ton of shit that makes no sense, then drip it out and create a ton of confusion. And this is what's happened. There is, like you said, just total confusion. This is a total GRU propaganda technique, and that is overwhelm and flood the Zone with information, some true information, some false information, and make it such that everyone's just fed up and shrugs their shoulders. And where I part from the majority of my progressive brothers and sisters is that I don't believe they should release the files. I think the way the Department of Justice and the other agencies who have compiled this data should be communicating with the public is through indictments and say, we are indicting the following people for what we believe is criminal activity, specifically child rape or trafficking girls or providing infrastructure for the abuse of children. But instead, they let out everything, and we're all like, oh, you know, what does A spiritual guru think. And by the way, if a cabinet member perjures himself under oath and is all indignant about having nothing to do with them, and then it comes out that he had a lot to do with them, that's criminal activity. But this has worked out perfectly or near perfectly. In my view. Perk is the wrong word. It's been less bad than it should be for the Trump administration because they have weaponized our institutions. Our institutions. The Department of Justice is the most poorly named government agency in the world right now. This has nothing to do with justice. It's the Department of Propaganda, it's the Department of Delay and Obfuscation. And I do actually think they're doing a really good job. Because while we're focused on what creeps spiritual guru or wellness longevity doctors are, the government officials or grown men who have engaged in child rape, nothing's going to happen. I am fairly confident that there's enough anger out there that a new attorney general in 2829 is going to come for some of these people. I think that there's enough thirst out there for blood and some sort of justice that you're going to see something happen. It's just not going to happen for another three years now. I don't know what the. I don't know what the statute of limitations is on some of these things.

Jessica Tarleff (21:26)

Yeah, I mean, that's the problem with a lot of it anyway. And I think where some folks that have been implicated have been taking some degree of solace in the situation. But, you know, it's a criminal question, but it's also a moral question, right. About the type of people who should be in leadership positions. And I don't wanna paint too broad of a brush. There are obviously people that are just, you know, casually like went to a dinner party there, you know, maybe their EAs didn't mention you're going to dinner at a convicted sex offender's house. It was soliciting prostitution from a minor. But, you know, plenty of people who also were in communication after he was prosecuted again. Right. For the stuff that ended him in a jail cell, you know, murdered. I mean, it was a really interesting. Julie K. Brown, the pioneering journalist on this from the Miami Herald, said she doesn't think that he killed himself. And now that we know about, like the erased tapes from the cell and you know that there are entries into the files about dummy bodies coming out different sides of the prisons to distract from the whole situation. There is obviously a lot more to this story. And I think that it Would be nice if we could get those details and that people could be reading from the same playbook because there's also a ton of bad information in these files, to your point, about everything getting released or not everything, since it's only going to be 2% of it. But, you know, I get very tinfoil hat e about these things. And I'm going down a lot of rabbit holes around, you know, the dentist chair that was in his house and the girlfriend that he had, the Belarusian woman who got into Columbia Dental School and, you know, had no business being there, or two administrators, I believe have been fired in connection with that. But there's a whole section of the Internet that is talking about how the dental chair was to remove girls teeth so that they wouldn't bite back. You know, like, you could go down a number of really scary paths, I guess. I do want to be hopeful though, for a second and talk about what's going on in New Mexico. So you saw how there was an exchange in the files about how there might be bodies buried at Epstein's Zorro Ranch, which is in New Mexico. That ranch is now owned by this big MAGA guy who's running for Texas comptroller. His son works in the White House, by the way. As an aside, he's endorsed by Turning Point. At this point, he was refusing to let people come and look for the bodies on the ranch. But New Mexico lawmakers last night voted unanimously to approve a truth commission with subpoena power to probe trafficking and sexual assault at the ranch. And that starts effective today. So that testimony actually could lead to prosecution. So I hope that state lawmakers across the country are taking note of what is possible, even without the DOJ wanting to help out, that maybe you'll get some answers when it comes to that. But, you know, I. It's all kind of comical, right? When you think like, the guy who owns it now is, you know, his son works in the White House and he's not letting people on there. Like, why wouldn't you let people on there to see if there are dead girls buried on your property? Also, why would you want to live on a property that might have dead girls buried on it?

Scott Galloway (24:46)

Yeah, the problem with all these rabbit holes is I worry that they're weapons of mass distraction and that we're all falling into it. So I thought Ro Khanna. Representative Khanna summarized it perfectly. He said, open quote, to have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for sexual Abuse of hundreds of young women in child pornography with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files is absurd. Representative Khanna wrote on X and the key to the Epstein files. The American public wants it all. I actually think the key to the power of investigatory agencies and justice is what's not released. The Department of Justice is there to create incentives. Specifically or in this case an incentive that tells people if you engage in child rape you're going to pay a huge price. I don't think they're there to ruin. You mentioned Casey Wasserman. As far as I can tell, Casey Wasserman send flirtatious emails to Ghislaine Maxwell before he was even convicted the first time in 2008. Yeah, everyone becomes the fucking Pope and Jesus when they get behind a keyboard and they want to engage in this ring light virtue that the algorithms love of tearing down people. I even saw this one person putting out tiktoks about how we should not endorse the brands of the. I won't even mention their names because I don't but these two famous models because they had email interaction with Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah, look, the guy had a yacht and threw great parties. I hate to break it to you folks but a lot of wealthy men and models really enjoy those things and will email with people. That doesn't mean we should be ruining their careers. And all we are doing by creating this like citizen ring light. I wouldn't even call it journalism but gossip slander is diluting from the focus of the department or what should be the focus of the Department of Justice and that is to indict, convict and imprison criminals. And instead we're trying to. Instead we're talking about this guy should resign or this guy should or shouldn't be on cbs. I think it's an incredible miscarriage of justice and we are falling into the exact trap that the Trump administration has laid for us. And that is okay. The Department of Justice isn't in the business of finding out what emails. Ouch. You is a total fucking creep. Okay? That's bad. It's really distasteful. It's not the business the Department of Justice should be in. The Department of Justice should be in the business of putting a man who is alleged to have impregnated an 11 year old on this island, putting him in prison for the rest of his life, such that the next time an Epstein class of person believes that they can rape children, thinks twice and says you know, maybe I shouldn't do this because Someone's gonna come for me and put me in prison. And that women who are abused like this or girls who are abused think the Department of Justice has my back. They may be slow, but the arc of the Department of Justice bends towards truth and justice. This department has lost so much credibility, but they are doing this. And to a certain extent, the Trump administration is getting a lot of flack. I think they've put on a masterclass here, courtesy of the gru, on how to distract from pedophilia and crimes potentially committed by some of the most powerful people in the world. And instead we're focused on all of the fun and all of the gossip and, oh, this guy's a creep, okay? Or this individual had contact with this person. Let's talk about it and let's pass judgment on it, because from a keyboard, I'm really fucking virtuous and can judge other people. This has been, in my view, the Trump administration, if they are trying to create diversion, confusion, dilution, we've fallen into that trap. They have played us.

Jessica Tarleff (28:40)

Now, I feel sad because I've been played, but I just wanted to add, well, two things. On the Peter Attia front, because you referenced that, I do think that there is a difference between people who have been caught up in this and had a few exchanges with him or, you know, flirted a little with Ghislaine Maxwell before anyone was convicted, and someone who exchanged what was over, like, 1850 emails with the person and seems to have from those emails some understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein actually was. And, you know, being a medical contributor, somebody that people go to for health advice, should, I think, carry even, like an extra level of weight or importance to it. And I'm not accusing him of doing anything with little girls or anything like that, but I think it is going to be very hard. And this would turn into a business decision which Bari Weiss has decided as of now that she is keeping him. That when you turn on the TV and he's talking to you about longevity, that you hear echoes of in your mind of someone saying, you know, but we can't tell anyone about who you actually are, and that he was with Epstein when his baby was in the icu, which he wrote about in his book, like, I'm not with you on some of these people who have been caught up in it, I think that you need to, as a full grown adult, express some better judgment when you are clearly aware of at least a few details about this guy that indicate that he is no good and have zero moral fiber at the very least, the second component about people needing to be convicted of things and to pay some sort of price. It is interesting in the latest tranche of documents that came out that there is evidence that the FBI interviewed a victim who credibly accused Donald Trump of sexual assault. And this happened in 2019. And there will be a question the DOJ, you know, isn't going to do anything about it. And again, I am not saying I have no evidence that Donald Trump did this. I am saying that there is an interview in the latest tranche of Epstein files on this and that Bondi may have perjured herself when she was testifying because she said that Trump was not implicated in anything. And that might be a legal question that the Democrats make something of. That was the only thing that kind of stood out on the legal front from her testimony.

Scott Galloway (31:11)

I think if somebody has perjured themselves, the Department of Justice has an obligation to indict them or say, we believe this person perjured themselves.

Jessica Tarleff (31:19)

Whether it was, you think Todd Blanche is going to be like, pam, you've gone too far now.

Scott Galloway (31:24)

And that might be. That'll probably be a different Department of Justice when it comes to someone like Peter Attia. The department, and this is the gray zone, the Department of Justice might feel that if a medical doctor who's been licensed and accredited by certain medical boards, do they have an obligation to inform them of what might have been criminal activity? Or. Let's go back. So look, President Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts, and he was found civilly liable for sexual abuse. I believe that warrants additional investigation by the Department of Justice for what appears to be evidence that he may have engaged in more criminal activity with respect to somebody just being an abysmal human being who is also providing medical advice and has just handled themselves incredibly poorly and has probably no business giving other people medical advice and having a big platform. I agree with that. I think that's hard to argue against. The question is, is that the business that the DOJ is in, is that what they do?

Jessica Tarleff (32:34)

I see.

Scott Galloway (32:35)

Because how far down do we go? And my view is the following litmus test. Is this person guilty, or is there evidence that warrants government resources to file a criminal indictment against this person? That's it. And as much fun as it is to call these people out, deservedly, for what incredible fucking hypocrites they are. I mean, Secretary Lutnick, my view is he's such an idiot that he committed a crime trying to cover up what wasn't a crime. If he had Just said, really poor judgment. This guy was my neighbor. He seemed like a baller. I thought he was well connected. Me and my kids went to his island. Just really poor judgment, it'd be over. Instead, he testified under oath that he was. He immediately smelled a rat and wanted nothing to do. Okay, that's called perjury, sir, but where is the line here? What is the Department of Justice in the business of and what are they not in the business of?

Jessica Tarleff (33:34)

Yeah, I totally agree with you. I think it's a real question also about our quality of journalists and how few people trust anyone in any sort of position of power, whether it's government or the quote unquote, mainstream media. And that was part of the drive for getting all these files out here. But the problem is you have, you know, citizen journalists or just anyone with access to an X account or whatever social media channel you happen to be on, and then that becomes Bible to you and it splinters us even more. But there's no question that these survivors deserve a lot more than they are getting or probably than they are ever to get in terms of even recognition for what they went through. And, and we should make sure that the focus always stays on that because it's just terrible. And to see the pain in their eyes and to listen to these interviews, it's sickening and it's just really sad.

Scott Galloway (34:37)

I think a decent opening statement or confirmation for the nominee for the next Attorney General, hopefully under a Democratic administration, would be, I am laser like, focused on bringing justice to the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and criminally indicting the people who engage in criminal activity, who engaged in child rape, provided infrastructure for it, trafficked it, and that is it. That is where I'm going to focus all my resources and that is it. And if you're looking for titillating information on what a fucking creep someone is, that's not why I'm here.

Jessica Tarleff (35:16)

Yeah, a professionalization of the office would be good.

Scott Galloway (35:20)

People don't realize, and this goes to just how much damage social media has done. There are two ways you don't get shamed by the community and cast out into the darkness and get eaten alive by bears and wolves. And that is one through either strength or wisdom. And one unfortunate means of somehow granting wisdom in a very fake, superficial. But what seems to be increasingly important, I don't know, vehicle, is that social media algorithms give you likes and attention and money. If you feed into the algorithms and finding somebody famous who is in these files for whatever reason, the algorithms love it. It's Embarrassing for them. It creates conversation. It creates likes. It creates another 50, 80, 100 bucks from AdSense on YouTube. And it elevates information that, in my view, oftentimes does nothing but polarize us, divide us. And here's how we end up with advance teal presidency, which is advance as president. Be clear, Thiel's not gonna be his vice president. He'll actually be the president. Vance will be the VP again. This is how it happens on the left. We just fucking attack each other. Casey Wasserman. That's who's gotta resign. Yeah, that's the guy. Flirtatious emails with Ghislaine Maxwell before Epstein is ever convicted of anything. That's the guy whose career we're ruining. That's the one who pays the price.

Jessica Tarleff (36:45)

You saw that great image. I think it was New Yorker did it with all the red arrows that point in one direction and then blue arrows are all pointing in different directions and at each other as a, you know, metaphor for how Republicans do politics and how Democrats do politics. And we are the ultimate circular firing squad every time.

Scott Galloway (37:07)

I'm totally triggered here because whenever I talk about the Epstein, but when I think I was summarizing something you had said, and I said that I said something along the lines of, this person should be criminally indicted and pursued for sex with underage women. All of the comments. All of the comments were about the words I chose, Scott. They're not underage women. They're girls. 100% right. 100% right. I will change my language. They're absolutely right. Essentially, this is what Democrats are really good at. We have fascists and people who seem to be covering for pedophiles coming across the plains towards us. And we're in a trench shitposting each other and saying, you're holding the gun wrong. You're my ally, but you're holding the. You chose the wrong words. So I'm coming for you. It's a. Our inability to embrace imperfect allies is how we lose this war 100%. All right, let's take a quick break. Stay with us.

Megan Rapinoe (38:12)

Megan Rapinoe here. This week on A Touch More, the one and only Flaje Johnson joins us to talk about leveling up for the wnba, managing nil money, and how she's nurturing her music career. We're also taking a closer look at why participation in girls sports is declining. Surprising, we know. And we're giving some love to Valentine's Day and what it's like dating a pro athlete and who's the best Athlete couple of all time. Check out the latest episode of A Touch More wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube.

Scott Galloway (38:50)

Welcome back. Before we go, Congress is deadlocked over funding the Department of Homeland Security. And the fight over ICE reform is unfolding as immigration enforcement continues expanding. Senate Democrats want body cameras and ID rules for agents. Republicans say ICE funding is already secured through 2028 and warn the shutdown is instead hitting FEMA and TSA. Jess, who do you think blinks first and how long can this drag on?

Jessica Tarleff (39:14)

I think it could go on for a while. I mean, especially because it's concentrated in dhs. It does not seem like Democrats, really, any of them, except like Fetterman really has much appetite for compromising, especially on some of these key planks. It'll be interesting if Republicans, you know, get it together and come back and say these are the two or three proposals that we can live with. I mean, even some very conservative senators have said, you know, definitely open to body cams. Masks seem to be where they're drawing the line. Like Tom Holman even said, we don't want to have to be wearing masks. But people's families are getting doxxed. I'm think that there's probably a correlation between what these agents are doing and the fact that people are coming after them. I am not in any way justifying it. I think that, you know, doxxing is unacceptable. People's families need to be kept safe and protected. But there's probably more, as with everything that we agree upon than we don't. But I think this one could go for a while. Lot of agencies affected. TSA, FEMA, Coast Guard, Secret Service, ICE, obviously U.S. customs and Border Patrol. But it is funded through the end of the Trump administration because of the reconciliation bill. They got an extra $75 billion. So it's a bit of a false choice talking point, I guess, to say, you know, defund ICE or we're gonna defund ice. You can't. That money has gone out the door. But I wanted to frame this in a way that you actually did around the Epstein files and even what we were talking about with the FCC overreach again. The Trump administration is taking major hits because of these very unpopular policy positions. So they're 100% on the back foot when it comes to ICE and immigration enforcement. Trump just hit new lows in four major polls. Quinnipiac, Yahoo, NBC and the AP. He's doing way worse than Joe Biden was if the election were held today. And the Rasmussen pollsters, a Right leaning pollster even said this Joe Biden would win. He's now at no -27 with independence. You cannot win an election at -27 with independence. Bleeding non college support. He was even down two points. This actually made me laugh with white voters. And Democrats haven't won white voters since 1964. So I'm not saying that that poll, it was a Quantus poll, is a good pollster that we would win white voters, but that's crazy. And now 58% of voters under 30 disapprove of the job Trump's doing. So every swing category, Latinos, especially Latino men, young voters, has swung back. And I think you can draw a direct line between what is going on in America's streets, especially in Minneapolis, and this change. And we're always looking for a silver lining or something to be hopeful about. And we were talking about this last week with your buddy Jeff Sonnenfeld and his new book and how can you push back and the idea of collective action. The people of Minneapolis have given us a roadmap. They have shown that you can push back effectively. It's a tragedy what happened with Renee Goode and Alex Preddy. Of course, I wanna talk about that a bit more in terms of what's going on with the ice. But they will back down if you show up and you peacefully protest and you tell them that this isn't all right, this isn't American. This is not how we do things here. Tom Holman announcing that the surge is over. A small security force is going to remain. That's a win for our side. And I think that we should recognize that and know that it is gonna take every one of us who feels distraught, disturbed, incensed, angry, livid over what's going on, that you may have to show up for a protest or two, that you may have to push back in any way that you can, that you may have to resist and unsubscribe, but that you can make change and you're not powerless.

Scott Galloway (43:12)

Yeah, I agree with you. I think that they picked the wrong state. Right. And I do think it's mobilized people and to be bereft and believe that we're the first generation to face this type of behavior or a dark time. It just doesn't understand or really have any historical context. We have absolutely faced worse predicaments than this, whether it's civil wars, world wars, plagues, interning Japanese people, civil rights violations, not mentioning the word AIDS because you think gay people are such an abomination. We have. We have Faced very big crises. And every time, Americans have equaled the moment. And the fear this time is that we have become so fat and happy and so prosperous that we take our institutions and our rights for granted. And I don't think that's happening here. And I think the people of Minnesota have kind of, as you've said, have kind of provided a great example and sort of led the way here. The trust in government, it's just so upsetting. Just 17% of Americans now say they trust the government in Washington to do what is right. Just about always is 2% and most of the time is 15%. Now get this, that's 17% versus in 1958, 73% of Americans trusted the federal government to do the right thing, always, most of the time. By 1980, post Vietnam and Watergate, only a quarter of Americans expressed a high level of trust. But it's still double what it is now. Two thirds of Americans report having not very much or no trust in Congress. So there's just a lack of, again of faith in our institutions. You said something earlier in the show I want to double click on. And that is, quite frankly, unless we, that is Democrats, fuck this up and we are famous at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, see above, start shitposting each other instead of actually focusing on the real adversary here. But you had said something. It looks as if we're going to take back Congress. You had said that. Now there's some credible pollsters, specifically the predictions markets, saying there's a non zero probability that we actually take the Senate. Do you have any thoughts on that? And can you be more specific about which Senate seats might be in play that weren't before?

Jessica Tarleff (45:24)

Yeah, I mean, so the ones that I feel really good about, North Carolina with Roy Cooper running there, I don't know. I'm so conflicted about what's going on in the main primary. But it does feel like Susan Collins is more vulnerable than she is usually. And I was someone who thought that there was a chance that she was gonna lose six years ago and she won by double digits. But it does feel like the mood is we need a change. Janet Mills, who's the current governor running for Senate in the Democratic primary, had a brutal, awesome ad about how concerned Susan Collins has been for decades and how she really does nothing about it. And she also, like many politicians had said, you know, not gonna serve for some absurd amount of time. I think it was just two terms. But she's been in there now, I think like 30 years. So that's pretty hard hitting, but it seems like Graham Platner, you know, the lefty candidate in there, has a lot of enthusiasm on the ground, and that's the, you know, this fight between the younger generation and the old guard is definitely coming into play. Ohio is really interesting. I love Sherrod Brown. He is, you know, the working class warrior and, you know, probably the only candidate who I think could win that Ohio seat back. Linking this to what we were just talking about with Epstein, the guy who is running against John Husted, I think that's how you pronounce it. Apparently took $100,000 from Epstein, and now Sherrod Brown is featuring that in his ads. And that'll be interesting to see. I think it's the only one in the country, at least on the congressional or Senate level, where we're talking about a potential Epstein angle to it, and we'll see how unpopular that actually makes you. So I think Ohio is, you know, it's a red state now. Jared Brown is the guy who could do it. You know, Texas I still think is a total pipe dream to be able to do that. And people are really interested in what's going on in Iowa. Rob sand, who's running for governor, feeling good. Nathan Sage just dropped out of the Democratic primary on the Senate side and endorsed Josh Turek, who is a very cool and interesting candidate, has an amazing story. So, you know, those are just some places, I guess, that I'm paying attention. But it is the first time that I've felt like there could be a blue wave. You know, Brian and I have been having those conversations, like every young set of parents. Where would it be better to live? Right? Like, where would it be better to raise kids? I know that you're a big proponent of the Florida model. I couldn't live in Florida under Governor DeSantis. I just couldn't get there. But it was the first time that I even allowed myself to say, well, like, what if David Jolley did win, right? Like, what if it is such a big blue wave that you have a Democrat in the governor's mansion in Florida? Does that change calculus about being in a state like that? And I think that it does. I'm not predicting that we have that big of a wave. But those conversations don't feel insane to people when you're flipping, you know, Trump plus 25 seats right? In states like Texas and Louisiana, you know, the map is getting bluer and it's lighting up brighter. And Democrats at this moment have the enthusiasm on our side showing up for these special elections. We're gonna show up on Election Day. The question will be, you know, what Trump on the trail will do. I happen to think it's just going to make us show up more because he's like that big flashing sign that we just can't stand. And midterm voters on the right don't tend to be as passionate as certainly the public party that's trying to get back into power. But that's, I guess, my overview.

Scott Galloway (49:05)

So you mentioned Florida, and obviously that's. I'm a resident of Florida. What do you think of a matchup between Lt. Col. Vindman, who's announced he's running in the Democratic primary for the special election seat for Rubio seat, versus the AG appointed to Rubio Senate seat by Governor DeSantis? Do you think Vindman has a shot?

Jessica Tarleff (49:24)

I have not looked at polling on that. I think the Vindmans, both of them, are very compelling. I don't know. It's a tough one because in a lot of ways, I think that he's representative of, you know, a conversation about democracy and the rule of law and like a lot of those lines of argumentation that we didn't win on previously. Do you know what I'm saying? So that part is tough for me. But ethically, morally speaking, like the kind of person that I would like to see going to Washington. Yeah, 100%. I think that's great. You know, it's interesting to see DeSantis, who was really on the outs with Trump, obviously challenging him in the last primary. Meatball Ron, I think, is what he called him. Apparently, he was playing golf with Trump just a few days ago, and you can see a move to bring the coalition back together. Trump is not picking as many fights internally as he was, except if you speak out about the Epstein files, like he's endorsing everybody in these primaries instead of picking sides. And I think Ashley Moody will definitely appeal to a lot of normies. She's an establishment favorite kind of person. And there are still a lot of Republicans out there that are begging for a world in which there's a return to normalcy.

Scott Galloway (50:46)

I think just as people underestimate Governor Newsom, I think they underestimate Governor DeSantis. I think you learn a lot running a campaign. You have an infrastructure that could be fired up pretty easily. I think he comes across as more of a leader than either Rubio or Vance. I would not count him out. And with respect to Vindman, I think he's an American hero. I follow Florida Politics semi closely, unfortunately, I think it's going to be an impeachment nostalgia campaign. And I don't think that's what Floridians care about. I think unfortunately, that race is going to be won or lost on boring shit like insurance, which a third of the of Florida homeowners can't get right now, and HOA fees that have skyrocketed and seniors are having to give up their condos because of regulation. I mean, it's basically, you have millions and millions of people in Florida who move down there thinking they'd spend the rest of their lives down there, who are having to sell their homes and leave because of the insurance market has totally turned against them. I mean, it's just, it sounds. I'm bored talking about it, but I think that is what's going to.

Jessica Tarleff (51:50)

That's what wins elections. Right? Your day to day life.

Scott Galloway (51:52)

Yeah, I think there'll be a lot of great ads about Lt. Col. Vindman and his, his uniform and talking about how brave he is. And that's not what, that's not what's going to turn people out. People are going to think, okay, well.

Jessica Tarleff (52:03)

It'S a great side dish, but the entree has to be improving people's lives. All the plans to lower your cost of living to make sure you have the insurance that you need. Last year I interviewed David Jolly for the podcast who's running on the Democratic side for governor. And he kept emphasizing that because, you know, he's a Republican turned Democrat. And that's the story that people like us always want to talk about. Like, you know, when did it hit you that the Republicans are so evil, right. That you had to come over to the other side? And he was like, I've got a plan to lower people's taxes. Right, to make sure that you can afford a home. Like, that's what people are showing up for. It is a luxury to be a quote, unquote democracy voter. Unless you can connect the dots, which I think that we can, between the assault on democracy and your cost of living, because that is available through the tariffs and all of these abuses with what's going on with immigration enforcement, because immigrants make us more prosperous and they make the country better. They are a net contributor. Right. They are the ones who are actually paying more into the system. But you're totally right. And I mean, we'll be paying attention to the campaign as it rolls out, but Vindman is a hero who needs an insurance plan.

Scott Galloway (53:15)

There you go.

Jessica Tarleff (53:16)

Like for actual insurance. Not like, because something's going to happen to him.

Scott Galloway (53:19)

All right, before we go, if you're watching us on YouTube, please make sure you hit subscribe. That's all for this episode. Thank you for listening to Raging moderates. Have a good week, Jess.

Jessica Tarleff (53:27)

Oh, you, too. See you.