Scott Galloway (2:09)

Was your favorite co host, who was your favorite when you cheated on me, who was the best?

Jessica Tarleth (2:13)

I mean, Heather Cox Richardson was great and intellectual bed, to say the least. No, Sarah Longwell was awesome too. And, you know, that was really great about it. I loved how many female voices we got on Jennifer Griffin, who's an amazing national security reporter, had a great conversation with her. We need to feature more women on the pod. The ladies are coming. How was your time off? And Davos, you know, all the things, it's great.

Scott Galloway (2:41)

I went to Australia. I got to climb the bridge with the boys. I Saw that on A Modern Family and said, I want to do that. I went to Singapore. My kids had never been there. I was in LA doing some work, Davos, which was interesting and depressing at the same time. And yeah, it's nice to be back. I feel sort of antsy and. But yeah, it's nice to be back. And fortunately, not a lot happened while I was gone.

Jessica Tarleth (3:05)

So, yeah, no big deal. Slow moving politics in this country.

Scott Galloway (3:09)

It's weird when you take some time off when you're not looking at the news every day, which I did not do. I remember when I came home once after being on the road for three weeks and I physically pop my head into my kid's room. And this was like when I was working really hard. My oldest was 6 and he was sleeping above his covers. And I could physically discern that he had grown in the three weeks that I'd been gone. And it just really bummed me out. But my point is, when you're in the news every day, you're a frog in water that's getting hotter and hotter and then it's boiling. And then when you come back after an extended break from the news and you see this shit, I was just. When I first got to Davos and I was listening to the talks and just the mood and the vibe and annexing Greenland, I thought it was just so kind of rattling and jarring to see how much things had changed in the last month with the murders in Minnesota and this annexation discussion and what was going on in Iran. And the two best lines while I was gone were. One was by your co host Heather Cox Richardson. A lot of people have been talking about the need for better training of these ICE officials. And she had the best line. I don't know if it was on the pod with you. She said, that's like saying that the guards at Dachau just needed better training. I thought that was a great line. And then the other line came from Katherine Dillon, who essentially runs Property Media, when I was in Davos and just coming back. And I said, I had spent a lot of time on panels talking about the need for some sort of military intervention to kind of push the Islamic Republic over the edge. And I kept saying, you know, they're executing citizens in the street. And Catherine goes, you realize that's happening in America, right? It was just sort of trying to stop me in my tracks, okay? Government executing people in the street, executing citizens in the street. And I hadn't taken the time to stop and go, wait, not on the Same scale, but that's happening in the US Anyways, I am happy to be back. In today's episode, we're discussing how Democrats should respond to the aftermath of the murder of Alex Pretty. The GOP's hypocrisy when it comes to the Second Amendment and the new Melania documentary and what it says about her priorities as First Lady. I'm hoping we do not get to the third subject that's called a I could give zero fucks given.

Jessica Tarleth (5:24)

Does this change it for you? Melania will be on the Five with me tomorrow, the day that this comes out.

Scott Galloway (5:30)

I don't wanna preempt it, but I think she's the worst first lady in history.

Jessica Tarleth (5:34)

Cool. Cool. I'll let her know.

Scott Galloway (5:37)

Yeah. And I don't think I've ever heard her speak. I don't. I, I, I know you have. Not really.

Jessica Tarleth (5:45)

Really. Okay. Anyway.

Scott Galloway (5:47)

Anyway. Yeah, I mean, I think that'll be. I think they will afford her. I, I don't know. That's going to be weird. You got to be. You know, I find that we're appropriately respectful of the First Lady. I think she's done absolutely nothing. And she clearly has, you know. Has she spent a night in the White House? Anyways? How many nights have you spent in the White House? Will you ask her that for me? It's been 400 days since he was elected or whatever inaugurated.

Jessica Tarleth (6:17)

How is be best?

Scott Galloway (6:19)

363. 70.

Jessica Tarleth (6:21)

How was the what be best? Remember her social media bullying campaign? That was her cause, like reading or getting fit, but it was social media bullying.

Scott Galloway (6:34)

Yeah. Ask her what she thinks about chain migration. That you move here, marry a rich guy, get citizenship, and then get all your family members over. Can you ask that what she thinks of chain migration?

Jessica Tarleth (6:45)

You know, I can ask anything I want. And I want to all of these options.

Scott Galloway (6:50)

Is this unfair?

Jessica Tarleth (6:51)

All right, let's talk about Minneapolis.

Scott Galloway (6:53)

All right, let's get into it. The killing of Alex Peretti has pushed Democrats into a fork in the road moment. After two US Citizens were shot dead by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, Democrats are threatening to block DHS funding unless ICE is reined in, even to risk a partial government shutdown. Meanwhile, pressure is now coming from multiple directions. A federal judge in Minnesota has ordered ICE's acting director to appear in court over what he called extraordinary violations of court orders. While Senior Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bevino and some agents are leaving Minneapolis amid mounting backlash, signs of federal crackdown may be hitting its limits. Jess is threatening a shutdown. The only leverage, real leverage that Democrats have to force accountability on ice. And if not, what else could. What else could be done here?

Jessica Tarleth (7:41)

I think it's your main source of accountability in Washington. I think we have seen that the biggest source of accountability that you can push for is what the brave people of Minneapolis St. Paul have been doing in taking to the streets and doing it in minus 20 degree weather and in totally fearless fashion. I am continually overwhelmed by how brave and good these people are and the way that they talk about Minnesota values and American values and living by the credos that all of these uber Christians are supposed to like helping your neighbor and taking in the tired and the sick and the poor. They have mobilized so quickly considering this. I mean, the amount of organizations that are working on the ground, the amount of individual citizens that are doing things like running makeshift food pantries and making sure that people who are hiding in their homes or homes of American citizens can get the things that they need. I was talking to someone who's doing this. The orders for diapers and children's medicine through the roof. It's freezing cold there, right? Their kids are getting sick, just like my kids are getting sick here. And they can't come out of their houses. And their neighbors are all stepping up for them. And I think that their example is one for the ages. And so that is a way to get accountability. There's Greg Bevino out, Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski getting a big talking to by the president. I agree with you from what you said yesterday on our rapid response video that Kristi Noem will not be long for that job. But when the legislators are sitting there in Washington looking at what their options are besides supporting the people of Minneapolis and wherever ICE may go next, this shutdown is the biggest way that they can push for accountability. And I think that it is very smart strategy. So what they want to do to be a little bit boring is they want to take the minibus spending bill that already exists and chop it up into five or six pieces so that the DHS section can be carved out. I want to note that for people that are saying, like, you know, we're going to defund ICE or abolish ICE, ICE is already funded at 87% higher level than it was the year before. Even if this $10 billion doesn't go through, that's the amount of money that's in question here. But I think that it is definitely worth continuing to push Senator Thune on it. And the Democrats are asking for five big things in their kind of reform package that DHS must cooperate with state probes. You would think that that would be normal and natural that you would have cooperation when you're investigating things like American citizens that have died. But that has not been the case. That CBP actually stays at the border, not allowed to roam wherever they want. They have to be within that hundred miles that you need a warrant for arresting people or breaking down doors. Fourth amendment and shout out. Agents have to have IDs and wear body cams. And we're waiting for that body cam footage from what happened with Alex Pratt. Apparently a couple of those agents were wearing body cams and ICE has to get out of churches and schools. So those are kind of the five big asks that are percolating in the conversation. What do you think about the shutdown strategy?

Scott Galloway (11:06)

I like it. I'm just worried that if we cave again after a certain amount of time that we're going to look even weaker. So I'm all about a shutdown as long as we all hold hands around the campfire and agree that we're not going to open until, you know, we get something. And my sense is we got nothing the last time. So I'm all for a shutdown. I just don't know if the people who will affect the shutdown have the backbone to. I mean, basically we blinked in the last shutdown, so I'm all for it. But guys, unless you're gonna, unless you're gonna actually wait until something happens, something tangible, unless there's real give on the other side and you can legitimately claim victory, then we no need to put the nation through this again. So, you know, it's like I've said that our military incursions overseas are like Bond films. And that is Bond films always nail the opening. They're always amazing. And then they go on to be a bad, a mediocre or a great film. The Democratic actions, when they have some power, start really strong and then we cave. So, you know, I'm all for it. But if they propose a shutdown, they get a shutdown. And we go through this nonsense again and you have parks closed and veterans not getting health care and Marines not getting paid. And then after 25 days we have some incredibly flaccid, impotent 90 year old democrats stand up and say it's not working, we're caving. Oh my God, we're going to go to the single digits in terms of popularity. So yeah, I'm all for a shutdown as long as it's real and people understand there's going to be real sacrifices to be made and, you know, it's going to be difficult. So any reaction to that?

Jessica Tarleth (12:52)

Yeah, I mean, the good thing about this versus the previous shutdown is it would be a partial shutdown. So it won't be this scale and scope of what happened before. And especially if the bills are.

Scott Galloway (13:04)

Can you say more about that? Like, what is that? I understand that it's. I like the term used minibus. What does that mean versus what would. What would the tangible differences in terms of how it impacts ordinary Americans and our federal services? How would this be? How would this shutdown be different than the last? What I think was a complete government shutdown or threatened at least.

Jessica Tarleth (13:23)

Yeah. So essential services, which allegedly kept going during, you know, the big shutdown, would continue obviously during this. But if you are able to target the DHS pot of it, there is concern that you don't want, like FEMA not to be working. For instance, we're going to have another huge snowstorm next week. So that's on the list of concerns. We all want TSA to continue to work. There are people who also want CBP to continue to work just in its capacity that it should. So that's kind of what's up for discussion at this particular moment in terms of the tangible implications of it. And I think that we'll know a lot more if any of that will come to fruition in the next 24 hours, maybe even when this comes out. Because Senator Thune is going to have to make a decision about whether he is going to split it up. If you don't have the bill split is going to have much broader implications for Americans. And there are a lot of Republicans who are dug in saying, absolutely not, we don't want to split this. That is Thune's inclination that he doesn't want to. But it is interesting to see that, you know, in your terms, the cavers, the Senate Democrats who ended up saying in the end, no, actually, let's just reopen the government. I have no appetite for this anymore. Like the Angus kings of the world of the word, Jean Shaheen, they've all said, absolutely not, like we're going to the mats on this one. And it's interesting to see the caucus even more united than they were over something like healthcare, which affects every single American. Right. Like we all, we all need healthcare, whether you're on Medicaid, Medicare, have private insurance or some combination. And I think that that energy is going to be put to good use in hopefully pushing us towards some of these reforms that I just read out. Rand Paul, who's the chair of the Homeland Security Committee, very, very powerful, is really hot on this. He wants all of the agents who were involved to be suspended. He's calling out the fact that Alex Preddy was referred to by government officials as a domestic terrorist, a would be assassin, right out of the gate. And there are other powerful conservative voices that are speaking a similar language to the Democrats. And so hopefully that'll put enough pressure on soon. The other component to it, which, I don't know, it doesn't satisfy the, the same mechanism, I guess. But is this conversation over impeaching Kristi Noem? And Kyle Cheney at Politico has been doing incredible reporting on this and he's tracked 2,300 cases since July in which federal judges have ruled that ICE has illegally detained people without bond or due process. 2,300 since July. In the read and in the intro, you mentioned how Todd Lyons, who's the acting ICE director, is going to have to go in front of a judge that is completely unprecedented. You have Tom Homan going into Minneapolis and there's another guy named Rodney Scott who is the head of CBP that Lewandowski and Noem had sidelined before, who is now being reactivated and is going to be sent to Minneapolis, too. So they are moving fast and with a sense of urgency that indicates that they know that this funding showdown is something that would look really, really bad for the administration. And Trump is sensitive to those kinds of optics. The articles of impeachment, just for some color on it, obstruction of Congress is one article which is about not letting Congress do their oversight, not letting them into ICE facilities, violation of the public trust. So First Amendment, fourth Amendment, second Amendment now with Alex Preddy. And then also charges of self dealing for Kristi Noem, of inappropriately using tax dollars to do ICE recruitment and giving contracts out to friends, namely senior DHS official Tricia McLaughlin, who is a spokesperson. Her husband got a massive contract and it didn't go through the normal tendering process. So I think that the impeachment of Kristi Noem is looking more and more like a good idea. And John Fetterman, who said that he doesn't want to shut down the government, came out this morning and said that Kristi Noem must go.

Scott Galloway (17:34)

So just along the lines of it's the boring stuff that moves the needle, it's important to revisit what you reference, and that is after Renee Goode's death, a bunch of Democrats refused to advance legislation that provided funding for ICE, but seven Democrats crossed party lines to pass it in 220 to 207 votes in the House. And if you look at those numbers, it means that those seven Democrats had in fact, fact gone along with their colleagues and refused to advance legislation that provided funding for ice. It wouldn't have gone through. And it's important that we hold those people accountable. And the seven representatives were Henry Cuellar, Rep. Don Davis, Rep. Lauren Gillen, Representative Jaron Golden, Representative Vincente Gonzalez, Representative Marie Glusenkamp Perez, and Representative Tom Suozi. I think it's important to highlight the Representative Suozzi has come out and said.

Jessica Tarleth (18:23)

It was a mistake and Gillen has as well.

Scott Galloway (18:26)

Oh, thank you for that. But this ICE funding would have been severed had those seven Democrats voted voted to restrict ICE funding.

Jessica Tarleth (18:35)

Sorry, I don't want to be like Debbie Downer or Tracy Flick of this podcast, but just to add that if they do split up the spending bill into the individual packages, part of the concern is then it has to go back through the House and you're not going to get the support that you would have that you got the first time from like Suozzi and Gillen for it. I mean, the Texas reps are probably going to hang on and continue to vote for it. So Senator Thune is thinking about that as well, that it would then get kicked back to Mike Johnson and has to go through that process again.

Scott Galloway (19:08)

And then the question is, what are the demands from the Democratic side to get to get the funding? And Schumer put forward a framework of restrict reform and restrain. Jess, what the fuck does that mean? Shouldn't, shouldn't it, shouldn't the condition be something along the lines of all ICE out of major cities for the rest of 26. Shouldn't it be something that like regular people can fucking understand?

Jessica Tarleth (19:36)

So abolishing ICE has its highest level of support that we've ever seen. It's gone up 20 points just from over the summer. 46% support, 41% oppose. Independents are plus 12 on it. Republican support is up 10% over the last six months. The most interesting finding that I saw in the polling around this is that 2/3 of Democrats and the majority of independents say abolish ICE is not, quote, abolish immigration enforcement. They want to figure out a way to do this that is commensurate with American values and our judicial system. And you know, the, the things that I read off in the beginning about making sure that people have warrants and body cams. And cooperating with state and local officials when you're doing probes, that's all part of that. But I agree with you that there needs to be some, you know, that bumper sticker effect. Right. Like some clear explanation of what a new reformed ICE would be like. It seems like ICE is a name that we are not going to be comfortable with again. So the Democrats should have a clear proposal for that that doesn't involve people, you know, ticking through, well, we're going to get this. We're going to get this. We probably won't get, but we're going to get this and we're going to get this because I think that you need to find a way to come out there and to say we know that there are undocumented people in this country that are committing crimes and we need to get out of. We need to get them out of here. And I think to some degree that involves also talking about blue city mayors cooperating to get those hardened criminals out. That's what Tom Holman is going to try to do when he's in Minneapolis. It seems like Mayor Fry and Tim Walls are open to those conversations. I'm not talking about, you know, full access to jails in the way that they're asking for, but like in California, they, they work with ICE all the time to do this. And Brian o', Hara, who's the police chief in Minneapolis, has talked about that, too. He did it in Newark, where he was the police chief before, and he's done it in Minneapolis, too. So I think that there is a lot of ground to be gained by sounding like you are not against immigration enforcement writ large and not allowing the right to cast abolish ICE as we don't care who's here. Right. Like hundreds of thousands of people streamed across the border on a monthly basis for a couple of years there. And we don't really care who they are because these tragedies happen. You have to care about both.

Scott Galloway (22:01)

Yeah. So I received a email or a message from someone and from the White House borders are Tom Homan's office saying that the people in the office listen to his pod. So I'm just going to ask if they pass along a message that if he removes ice from Minnesota, I'll give him $51,000 and that's a serious offer.

Jessica Tarleth (22:21)

500,000 than the Kava bag.

Scott Galloway (22:23)

Well, you know, he's done last for 50, so. 51K. Zar Holman. Yeah, I don't. I think the Democrats again, are demonstrating this. Restrict restraint like they need Specific, realistic demands where they can point to a victory. I don't know what even what that means. Restrict and restrain. What does that mean? So, again, we were figuring out a way through what I feel is incredibly weak leadership to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory here. If you try and read the tea leaves, you have said that you believe that Secretary Noem will be removed, that Homan's moving in. They haven't replaced Movino. They just asked him to maybe kind of stop getting.

Jessica Tarleth (23:07)

There are conflicting reports, though. I think that he will be forced into retirement. Which one of the reports that I saw said, you know, that that was coming quickly and it was already on the schedule. Could be moving up. Saw another report that he doesn't have access to his social media accounts anymore because he did such irreparable damage while tweeting away. So I, I don't think Bovino is going to be a figure that we are going to be seeing a lot of.

Scott Galloway (23:36)

So you think his days are numbered?

Jessica Tarleth (23:38)

That would be my expectation. That would be what would be smart for the administration. And I believe that's what Tom Holman wants. I mean, Tom Holman has been fighting against the Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, Corey Lewandowski, Greg Bevino wing of the government for months now. And it has been widely reported that they have been trying to sideline him. And Tom Holman, you know, his, his approach is even too harsh for me. But Tom Holman has served both Democratic and Republican presidents in the past and has said over and over in interviews, like went on the D and did a great interview where he talks about his focus on getting hardened criminals out of this country. And I think that that would be a good sign for us if Trump is really ready to hand over the reins. I still worry about Stephen Miller because I worry about Stephen Miller all the time. But we are in much better hands if it's Homan. And I'm sure he. There's no love loss there with Kristi Noeman. I'm sure he would be just fine seeing her come.

Scott Galloway (24:35)

That's where we are.

Jessica Tarleth (24:36)

We're hoping for Homan, hoping for Homan.

Scott Galloway (24:39)

So the, there are cracks, meaning, I mean, real fissures beginning to emerge and form here. A New York Times Santa University poll from this month said 61% of voters believe that ICE tactics had gone too far. My question is, who are the 39%? But anyways, many Republicans have also expressed concern and have called for an investigation. Senator, Senators Murkowski, Cassidy and Tillis have all asked for investigations, even Representative James Comer of Kentucky, who has been a staunch ally of the president, suggested on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures that Mr. Trump should consider removing ICE agents from Minneapolis and sending them elsewhere. Trump's overall approval rating has slid to 38%, according to the latest Reuters Ipsos poll, matching the lowest mark of his second term. And There are now 140 co sponsors on a bill to impeach Kristi Noem. So it does appear as if these cracks are turning into pretty broad sinkholes, if you will. Alright with that. Let's take a quick break. Stay with us.

Podcast Sponsor/Ad Narrator (25:43)

Shopping is hard, right? But I found a better way Stitch Fix Online Personal styling makes it easy. I just give my stylist my size, style and budget preferences. I order boxes when I want and how I want. No subscription required. And he sends just for me pieces plus outfit recommendations and styling tips. I keep what works and send back the rest. It's so easy. Make style easy. Get started today@stitchfix.com Spotify that's stitchfix.com Spotify.

Podcast Promo Narrator (26:15)

Right now, in the world of AI, two things are happening simultaneously. One, the technology is getting better fast. People are finding new uses for it. It's more popular than ever. And two, every company that makes AI is absolutely hemorrhaging cash. On the Vergecast this week we're talking about what OpenAI and other companies are doing to try to finally figure out how to make some money off of this technology. Spoiler alert, it's mostly ads, and we're talking about whether any of it's actually going to work. All that, plus some stories about the Chinese company that appears to be beating Tesla. On the Vergecast Wherever you get podcasts.

Scott Galloway (26:56)

Welcome back. The killing of Alex Preddy has blown open a glaring contradiction at the heart of Republican policies and beliefs, specifically something central to the Republican Party, and that is gun rights. For decades, the GOP has argued that the Second Amendment exists to protect citizens from an overreaching federal government. Let's say that again, the Second Amendment exists to protect citizens from an overreaching federal government. Yet now Trump officials are arguing that a man lawfully carrying a gun somehow forfeited that right and deserved lethal force. As even the NRA and gun rights groups push back, the question isn't whether Preddy was exercising a legal right. It's why that right suddenly seems to disappear when federal agents pull the trigger. Just how does the GOP square its longstanding warnings about tyran with defending federal agents who kill a citizen for lawfully carrying a firearm?

Jessica Tarleth (27:58)

I Think some of them are just trying to bury their head in the sand. And you're seeing with many others, with the majority of them, in how they're responding to this, that they have loved their gun longer than they have loved Donald Trump, and that this is the one amendment that they are not willing to play his little games with. And I think that it in particular hit the gun rights community hard to see an administration official, the first assistant U.S. attorney, this guy Bill Asale, who tweeted, if you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you. And seeing it in black and white doesn't allow you to live in the chaos that the Trump administration thrives on. Right, because they can't use their echo chamber against that, because that's just freely available for you to look at and to read. And then that fact that Trump also posted a photo of Alex Preddy's gun, you know, how they removed it and then they took a picture of it, like sitting in the front seat of a car. And Trump wrote, this is the gunman's gun, loaded parentheses, with two additional full magazines, but we haven't seen the magazines. And it says, and ready to go. What is that all about? I think that having the tangible evidence of how this administration actually views the Second Amendment when they please is what really felt threatening to so many people in the conservative party, the gun rights activists, but also just the regular Trump supporters. And they've been posting videos all over social media saying, I voted for Trump three times. We cannot stand for this. The Second Amendment means something very specific. And I've seen a resurfaced old Charlie Kirk tweet that they're using about the Second Amendment and how the point of it is to rise up, to be able to rise up against a tyrannical government. I just wanted to shout out Jon Stewart. His monologue was great, but he said, I wasn't shocked when you guys gave up the First Amendment, and I wasn't shocked when you gave up the 4th and the 10th and the 14th at Trump's behest. But the second, come on, guys. Guns are your whole personal and way better delivery than I did, obviously, but I think that you're really seeing that come to fruition. And this reminder as well, that Trump is new to Republican politics on a relative basis. I mean, this guy is a independent from Queens, right? Like, he's not somebody who was carrying a gun, let alone caring about what happens when you need to rise up against your government. He was building high rises here and opening hotels. And I think that they see how weak he is on one of the most serious issues.

Scott Galloway (30:49)

To them, the best argument that the NRA has ever made and the best argument for the Second Amendment, in my view. And I'm not a. I'm not a gun rights person. I'm. One of the things I love about the UK is I'm just never worried about someone popping off a cap when I'm watching, you know, the Fantastic Four in a movie theater. But the best argument I've ever heard calls on history, and that is when the Nazis marched into Poland and France and other European countries. Those countries had done a very meticulous job of tracking gun ownership, and the first thing the Nazis did was get a hold of those records and then go around the city and collect all the guns from the civilian population, such that there was no ability to push back. That is, in my opinion, a really, really valid argument. And also, to be fair, gun owners similar to Mr. Preddy, who go through the training and are legally licensed to carry, conceal and carry, are seven to 10 times less likely to commit a crime than ordinary citizens. Now, there's some other data. When this moment you buy a gun, you're more likely to kill yourself, unfortunately, because it's like, okay, you wake up, things are bad, things are really dark. And like, I know I'm an answer to this problem, but in terms of people who go through the proper training and have no criminal record, which Mr. Preddy did not, if you just look at the data, these people are less likely to commit a crime than someone wandering around without a gun who might have committed a misdemeanor. So this really does fly in the face. And then you have all these pictures popping up that I love of Kyle Rittenhouse, who shows up to a demonstration brandishing a semiautomatic rifle. And then those turned are posters and collateral, and he's invited to the Republican National Convention. So this really does appear to be. I don't think that's the second biggest fissure with the American public. I do think the American public, certain Judeo Christian values are certain. Like to think that we're the good guys and we hold onto a set of principles and morals. And when Secretary Noem came out and basically defecated on the grave, and the memory of this individual, by calling him a domestic terrorist and basically saying he was there to. I believe it was, what do they say? Murder, federal agents, or. What was the term? Massacre. It's just there is a certain decorum that when People die. You try to give them the benefit of the doubt that you don't urinate on their tombstone and start lying. I think that, in my view, I think that was the moment I saw that and I thought, okay, granted, I do not understand many of the motivations and the forces that got President Trump elected, but I thought. I think that's the moment when a lot of people said, okay, this has just gone way too far. I'm sort of curious around how your co hosts on the Five are responding to the gun rights issue, because if I didn't know what the Five was, I would assume it's the most liberal talk show in history. I would think it was the View, because all I get is clips of you making very strong points that are not left but what I'll call center left. So if my only interact. If I didn't know what the Five was, I would think it was this crazy liberal show on the Mother Jones Network. Because all I get are clips of you because the, the. I guess the algorithms have figured out. I know you and I like your views, but when they're faced, what. What is the general retort back around Mr. Credit and the contradiction of gun rights here from the other four members of the Five.

Jessica Tarleth (34:29)

Well, it's definitely the algorithm that has us synced up. Because I can assure you that a good half of the Internet thinks that I'm the stupidest woman that ever lived and are making unfair comparisons. Because I did bring up Kyle Rittenhouse, who not only showed up with a gun, brandished a gun, shot and killed two people injured, another one found not guilty that he was. It was self defense, but much more controversial situation than what Alex Preddy did. And certainly considering the fact that he was disarmed when he got 10 bullets in him, I was actually surprised because we. We talked right before I went into work yesterday and I thought that there would be more agreement about what had happened. And I got into it a bit with Kayleigh McEnany, who was Donald Trump's press secretary in the first term, and she agreed.

Scott Galloway (35:21)

How is she? Thirsty. She is definitely there for one person trying to get another job. That's how I read it whenever I.

Jessica Tarleth (35:26)

This job is way better for her, for sure. I would not. Kaylie is not leaving, but she was talking about how I jumped to a conclusion in saying that Alex Prady was murdered and had this line that I was no better than Kristi Noman doing it. And I was one of those coulda, woulda, shoulda. Because right after I was like you should have just. You should have just said, I'm not the head of the Department of Homeland Security. I'm not responsible for the security and safety of 330 million Americans. I am somebody who has paid for my opinion, and I have watched a ton of video on this and listened to a lot of people in positions of power, including governors, states like Oklahoma and Vermont, who have said the same thing. But that's my coulda, woulda, shoulda. On the gun rights issue, it was really interesting listening to Joey Jones, who is a veteran, lost both of his legs with an IED incident. He's a gun owner. There are many pictures of him on the Internet with his closet of guns or his whole basement of the. It's. It is a lot of guns. He said something about being a Second Amendment absolutist and then went into things that Alex Preddy had done wrong. And that argument doesn't make a ton of sense to me, because the people who you're seeing online and the NRA and all these gun rights groups are Second Amendment absolutists in the absolute sense. And it brings up this question of what are the things that you're doing that maybe put you into a less safe environment? Which definitely going to a protest is less safe than sitting on your couch and watching heated rivalry, but that there were things that Alex Preddy did that put him in more of a vulnerable position, like, allegedly, though we don't know, he didn't have his permit and his ID on him. Again, we have no verification that that was the case. And just the act of having a gun when you go, sends a signal that you are there as an agitator versus as a peaceful protester. Now, I don't see things that way, but this is somebody who, you know, has a very big voice in the military community and the conservative community. That was his take on it. And you can look that up online. And people liked that just as much as they liked me talking about the comparison with Kyle Rittenhouse. So that's what I heard yesterday.

Scott Galloway (37:53)

Well, FBI Director Kash Patel said, open quote, you cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple.

Jessica Tarleth (38:04)

Yeah.

Scott Galloway (38:04)

Director Patel, have you seen any of the footage from January 6th or the guns there? So those folks were in the wrong. They did not have rights to bear arms at that protest. Also, just this is a bit of a. This is a tangent and a side note, but something that struck me, I don't think, and I'm guilty of this what infects a lot of big tech CEOs is that they don't understand the vulnerabilities of certain special interest groups because they've never been victims themselves. They're mostly white dudes who have grown up in wealthy households. And I'm guilty of this. I remember during COVID my sister, I was talking with my sister and she jumped out of her skin when a homeless person kind of stirred and crossed the street. And I said that was a bit of an overreaction. She said, Scott, you're 62190. Easy for you to say. And it dawned on me that men live in a different world. And that has really come to bear or front center for me recently. One tracking some of the comments you get. And also someone left a voicemail in Kara, who's unafraid, played the voicemail on Pivot and it was so angry and vile. And I said to her, I said, I know I have just as many people who don't agree with my views as don't agree with yours. I never get those voicemails. And there's also, to some of your comments, the really vile ones, there's a twinge of threat of violence and just plain misogyny that men don't have to put up with. And by the way, I'm someone who believes that if you're a true feminist and will know when we have equality, when you're subject to the same bullshit that we're subject to, I think that's what equality is. But what I would suggest to a lot of young men is to recognize what I did not recognize. And that is there is an unfortunate thin. It's not even a vein, but it's a thin avenue, a river of people, especially men, who are more comfortable saying really vile, borderline threatening violence statements to women than they do to men. And some of the comments I've seen in your feedback and some of the comments I see in Kara's feed and some of the feedback she gets, there's a twinge of, you know, bitch, be careful, I'm coming for you.

Jessica Tarleth (40:24)

Yeah.

Scott Galloway (40:25)

And men just do not receive that bullshit. And to recognize if you are a young man that it's. You have to force yourself to have more empathy and turn the volume down and equate yourself with more grace. Because unfortunately, there is a large vein of people, especially men and also some women. The woman who left this vile map misogyny takes. Misogyny is not sequestered to just men, but to recognize. All right, would these statements fly or Is there an unhealthy vein of threat here? Because the target has indoor plumbing. But I have finally recognized that, you know, it's like, we'll get comments of like, well, welcome to our world, Scott. But long winded way of saying young men, I think need to realize that you live around these things, around threat in a different world than women face. All right, my virtue signaling TED Talk is over.

Jessica Tarleth (41:24)

I liked it and it's true. And it's especially once you become a mom and you are responsible for protecting these little people, you have a heightened awareness for the level of threat. Obviously I'm in a particular profession that brings it on more. But you're, you know, mama bearing all the time and Tara is bolder than I am. I get really freaked out and very upset with the new administration of Twitter. Cause also when you put in the report of threats, which seem quite obvious, sometimes they'll write back and say, oh, it doesn't meet our, our standards for that. And you're like, what are your fucking standards if not like, you deserve to die. So anyway, there you go.

Scott Galloway (42:19)

All right, let's take a quick break. Stay with us. Welcome back. Before we go, just hours after a federal immigration agent shot and killed Alex Preddy in Minneapolis, the Trumps were inside the White House hosting a movie night for their billionaire friends. Part of Melania Trump's reemergence into the spotlight this week, her heavily marketed Amazon backed documentary Melania, which comes out on Friday and reportedly earns her a $40 million payday from the deal. So I asked one of the folks here at Prof. G to stream this and then put it on one of those old machines. It puts it on VHS tape such that I could get the tape and put it in my VHS recorder and player, which I still have, so I could erase it. Is that wrong, Jess? Is that wrong?

Jessica Tarleth (43:04)

I don't think it's the best use of a profge employee's time, but I think it's kind of cool you still have a VHS player. Is that for home videos that you just saw?

Scott Galloway (43:15)

None of that was true. It was an attempt to be funny. I see this as more as just. This is just another example of Amazon. I don't know if you've heard this, Jess, but I. The executive producer of his original scripted drama coming out next, I did hear that somewhere. Yeah. No sort of a big deal in Hollywood now. And I've gotten to know or understand a little bit about the world of documentaries and everything. And there's actually, interestingly enough, there's A bidding war for Ed Norton's new film at Sundance. I heard that yesterday.

Jessica Tarleth (43:45)

That's awesome.

Scott Galloway (43:45)

Congratulations, Ed. But for Melania Trump to have received $40 million, this is nothing. This is kind of along the lines of putting money in a crypto account for the president. That, first off, that documentary would have never been made because she's a strikingly uninteresting person in a very interesting situation. But $40 million for documentary just doesn't happen. So this is an attempt by Andy Jassy and the good folks at Amazon to just curry favor with the White House and the administration, which is another form of kind of soft corruption. Anyways, Are you going to see the documentary, Jess?

Jessica Tarleth (44:22)

I wasn't really planning on it. Like I mentioned at the beginning, she's gonna be on the show tomorrow, so, you know, we'll ask her some of your thoughtful proposed questions. I just wanted to add that it was the 40 million for the documentary, and they've also spent 35 million promoting it. And early reports are that the tickets aren't selling, which doesn't surprise me here and abroad. And I think that it's going to be one of those kind of inside baseball things where it's the, you know, the toast of Mar A Lago and has no resonance outside of that bubble. And I get it. The Trump administration is a big pay for play scheme. And why would that be any different when it comes to the first lady versus what you would be paying to the President himself? But I do always wonder, and since, I mean, I like a compliment as much as the next girl, probably a little bit more than the next girl, and everyone likes to be flattered and things like that. But it really eats at me when I think that somebody is being nice to me or giving me false praise because they want something or they think I can help them with something. And what must it feel like when you're just being flattered and sucked up to all the time and that it has nothing to do with actual merit or who you are as a person? That's what I really struggle with. And that goes for all of them. Like, it, it doesn't, you know, Trump standing there holding Maria Machado's Nobel poster that he, that she made for him like he was a 6 year old. Like, how can you live with yourself if you are that dependent on false adulation from people who are actually doing important things with your, with their lives?

Scott Galloway (46:18)

I think you're being a little harsh. I think it's the dramatic story of a, about quiet desperation, of having to marry a billionaire and still feeling underpaid.

Jessica Tarleth (46:28)

I got that joke.

Scott Galloway (46:30)

You know what? I might just watch it because I want to hear how the subtitles handle. I'll turn the subtitles on. I want to hear how the subtitles handle really long pauses of songs. Someone who doesn't understand the question. Is that wrong? That's probably a hate cr. No, I'll give her this.

Jessica Tarleth (46:45)

I haven't become a subtitle person by the way though. I put it on now. I love it.

Scott Galloway (46:52)

Next thing you know you'll be watching TV and you're legal. Twitch and like, oh my God, I have restless leg syndrome. I need to get that drug being advertised. Yeah, yeah. I don't. Oh God. Jesus Christ. Let's move on.

Jessica Tarleth (47:04)

There's nowhere to move. It's the end of the show.

Scott Galloway (47:06)

It's the end of the show. There we go. Good luck with Melania, Jess.

Jessica Tarleth (47:10)

Thanks.