Scott on Hotel Brands, Netflix’s Adolescence, and Theranos Takeaways

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

Episode: Scott on Hotel Brands, Netflix’s Adolescence, and Theranos Takeaways
Release Date: April 23, 2025
Host: Scott Galloway
Network: Vox Media Podcast Network

---

Introduction

In this episode of The Prof G Pod, Scott Galloway delves into a range of insightful topics, responding to listener questions about the hotel industry's branding strategies, the implications of the Netflix series Adolescence on modern masculinity, and reflections on the infamous Theranos scandal. True to his reputation, Galloway combines business acumen with thought-provoking life and career advice, offering listeners a comprehensive analysis of each subject.

---

Office Hours: Listener Questions

Timestamp: 02:00 – 10:28

1. Branding Stratification in the Hotel Industry

Listener: Ray from San Jose
Question: Is the proliferation of hotel brands under major conglomerates beneficial for the market, or does it lead to consumer confusion and hinder differentiation?

Scott Galloway’s Response:

Galloway begins by expressing his personal passion for hotels, noting, “I love hotels. I travel to hotels, not to cities” (02:16). He explains the current landscape, where major hotel corporations like Marriott, Hilton, IHG, Wyndham, Accor, and Hyatt dominate with over 150 brands and nearly 40,000 properties. This consolidation allows these companies to diversify their brand portfolios, achieve economies of scale, and maintain the prestige of their flagship brands.

However, Galloway highlights the rise of niche brands facilitated by platforms like Instagram, stating, “you can find your exact brand” (04:45). This shift allows consumers to seek out highly specialized experiences without relying solely on the overarching brand reputation. He cites examples such as Rosewood’s unique properties and the luxury experiences offered by brands like Six Senses and Cheval Blanc.

Galloway also touches on the economic model of hotel branding, explaining how management companies maintain high margins (8-12% of top-line revenue) without taking on significant capital risk. He concludes that the diversification of brands under large conglomerates ultimately supports a more fragmented yet specialized market, catering to diverse consumer preferences without diminishing overall brand strength.

Notable Quote:

“At an era of weapons of mass diligence, where people can find out that the best gym in a hotel in Berlin is the Soho House, and they can find that the coolest new hotel in Sao Paulo with the best restaurant is the Rosewood.” (04:30)

2. Impact of Netflix’s Adolescence on Masculinity and Modern Boys

Listener: Ethan Raab
Question: What did Galloway find impactful about the Netflix show Adolescence, and how does it relate to his views on masculinity and the effects of the modern world on young people?

Scott Galloway’s Response:

Galloway candidly shares his emotional response to the show, admitting, “As the father of boys, it just… rattled me to the core” (11:03). He emphasizes the critical role parents play in shaping masculinity, advocating for a balanced approach that includes being a provider, a procreator, and importantly, a protector. Galloway laments the societal shift where women often feel unsafe, mentioning how first-rate masculine role models like cops and firefighters are essential for fostering a sense of security among young boys.

He reflects on the challenges of parenting in the digital age, questioning, “who is raising your kid?” (14:50). Galloway argues that excessive screen time and social media exposure can disconnect children from meaningful, in-person interactions and parental guidance. He advocates for federal legislation to limit social media use among minors and stresses the necessity of early education that reinforces positive masculine traits centered around protection and responsibility.

Notable Quote:

“I think with boys we really have to play up the third leg of the stool of masculinity. And that is you're a protector.” (12:45)

---

Reddit Hotline: Theranos Takeaways

Timestamp: 20:08 – 25:09

Question: Did Scott Galloway ever meet Elizabeth Holmes? What was his impression of her and the Theranos saga? What are his thoughts on the "fake it till you make it" founder philosophy?

Scott Galloway’s Response:

Galloway addresses the Theranos controversy with a critical eye, discussing the cultural emphasis in Silicon Valley on raising capital and creating hype, often at the expense of truthfulness. He draws parallels between Elizabeth Holmes and other high-profile figures like Elon Musk, who he argues frequently exaggerate timelines and capabilities. Galloway states, “the difference between storytelling and fraud sometimes, quite frankly, is your performance” (22:15).

He criticizes the gender dynamics in the fallout of Theranos, noting the harsher treatment of female founders compared to their male counterparts. “She paid the price… but only 2 or 3% of unicorns are founded by women” (23:40). Galloway expresses discomfort with the disproportionate punishment faced by Holmes, suggesting that misogyny plays a role in the severity of the consequences. He underscores the importance of honesty in leadership, asserting, “Never lie about your numbers, never lie to consumers” (24:30).

Notable Quote:

“Fake it till you make it. Never lie about your numbers, never lie to consumers that you're serving at that moment.” (24:10)

---

Conclusion

In this episode, Scott Galloway provides a nuanced analysis of the hotel industry's branding complexities, the profound impact of media on contemporary masculinity, and the ethical pitfalls exemplified by the Theranos scandal. His insights underscore the importance of authenticity in business, the role of social media in shaping societal norms, and the need for responsible leadership. Whether discussing high-end hotel strategies or the challenges faced by modern parents, Galloway consistently offers valuable perspectives grounded in real-world experience and thoughtful consideration.

---

Final Thoughts

For listeners interested in the intersection of business strategy, societal trends, and personal development, this episode of The Prof G Pod offers a wealth of knowledge and actionable insights. Scott Galloway’s engaging discussions and candid reflections make complex topics accessible and relevant, ensuring that both seasoned professionals and casual listeners find value in his analyses.

---

Note: All timestamps correspond to segments within the provided transcript and are indicated for reference purposes.

Transcript

[Scott Galloway]

Support for the show comes from Panerai. For more than 150 years, Panerai's watches have showcased the perfect balance of pioneering innovation and the brand's storied legacy. And now the newly unveiled Luminor Marina timepieces celebrate the evolution of one of Panerai's most emblematic and enduring collections, the Luminor. While the Luminor collection traces Back to the 1960s, the latest models introduce new, innovative materials and design refinements while retaining the collection's bold, iconic style. You can shop the new Luminor collection at Panerai or make an appointment at the boutique nearest you. Discover the world of Panerai at P A N E R AI.com.

[Prav G]

Support for the show comes from ServiceNow, who are.

[Scott Galloway]

Enabling people to do more fulfilling work, the work they actually want to do. You know what people don't want to do?

[Prav G]

Boring, busy work.

[Scott Galloway]

But now, with AI agents built into the ServiceNow platform, you can automate millions of repetitive tasks in every corner of.

[Prav G]

A business, it, hr, customer service, and more. And that means your people can focus.

[Scott Galloway]

On the work that they want to do. That's putting AI agents to work for people.

[Prav G]

It's your turn. Get [e-mail] AI agents.

[Claire]

Support for this show comes from Nordstrom. Nordstrom brings you the season's most wanted brands, Skims, Mango Free People and Princess polly, all under $100. From trending sneakers to Beauty Must have, they've curated the styles you'll wear on repeat this spring. Free shipping, free returns and in store pickup make it easier than ever. Shop now in stores [e-mail].

[Prav G]

Welcome to Office Hours with Prav G, where we.

[Scott Galloway]

Answer your questions on business, big tech, entrepreneurship and whatever else is on your mind.

[Prav G]

Today.

[Scott Galloway]

We've got two great listener questions. Then after the break, we'll hit the.

[Prav G]

Reddit hotline, pulling questions straight from Reddit. Want to be featured? Send a voice recording to office hoursprophagmedia.com.

[Scott Galloway]

Or post on the Scott Galloway subreddit.

[Prav G]

Let's get into it. First Question.

[Ray]

Hi Prof. G Ray from San Jose here. Love the podcast and other teachings you provide. Speaking of teachings, I'm an adjunct professor here in the Bay Area. I teach entrepreneurship in the College of Engineering. You seem to know a thing or two about brands and you often talk of your favorite hotels. My question is around branding stratification in the hotel industry. There are just so many brands owned by the top three hotel groups that it just seems a bit much. Is having so many brands a Good thing for the market or does it add to consumer confusion and a hotel's inability to differentiate? Would love your take on the situation. Hope to meet you live one day. Thanks for all you do.

[Prav G]

Thanks, Ray. I love this question because my hobby is hotels. I know that sounds stupid. People say, what are your hobbies? I love hotels. I travel to hotels, not to cities. I get all of those surveys and I'm on Instagram or whatever, and if I see a cool new hotel, I'll travel to that. So I know a lot about hotels, or at least I think I do. Anyways. Today there are more than 1200 hotel brands worldwide. However, many of these brands are owned by conglomerates. The sixth largest hotel corporations, Marriott, Hilton, IHG, Wyndham, Accor and Hyatt, own more than 150 brands and they operate nearly 40,000 properties. The industry hasn't always been this consolidated. Due to a series of major mergers and acquisitions, the number of large hotel groups was cut in half in the 90s. Nowadays, just 10 companies control over 65% of hotel room supply. That's not even counting Airbnb, which I think has more rooms on its platform than any hotel company. Consolidation allows hotel companies to diversify their brand portfolios, access economies of scale and centralized operations, all without sacrificing the perception of their flagship brands. Okay, so there's a couple things. I understand the notion that, okay, one brand, you get scale, one advertising campaign, one set of associations. What you need is scale on the back end. But in an era of weapons, of mass diligence, where people can find out that the best gym in a hotel in Berlin is the Soho House, and they can find that the coolest new hotel in Sao Paulo with the best restaurant is the Rosewood. Or they can find that the coolest kind of hippest place for a romantic getaway with really unusual architecture. In Cabo is Las Ventanas al Paraiso, also a Rosewood property, you can find your exact brand. You no longer need to defer to the brand. What does that mean? It means that a series of niche brands have been able to evolve that sometimes have a back end that they can consolidate around reservation systems. Because basically the hotel industry is the following. It's a wealthy person locally wants to own all the Four Seasons. Michael Dell in Hawaii owns all the Four Seasons. And the Four Seasons runs the flag, the standards, the service, the reservation system. And they take 8 to 12% top line. You think, well, that's not a lot. Actually, that is the best thing to do because that's high Margin revenue. And they aren't subject to the economic whimsical of our economy. So in 2008, basically I think the four seasons of Midtown went bankrupt. But the four seasons out of Toronto, which only owns one of its hotels, I think it's flagship in Toronto still gets that 8 or 12%. And the guy who owns the thing has to hemorrhage money because the Four Seasons in their ownership partnership contract says okay, you have to maintain a certain level of standards, you have to have three check in people, you have to clean the room twice a day. And so even in bad economic times, these companies just the flag itself, which is a management company, doesn't take any capital risk, just prints money. And then they found this other kind of gangster way to make a shit ton of money. And that is they sell residences. So the Aman will sell residences in Miami and instead of call it 2000 bucks a square foot, they can charge 4000 cause it's an Aman branded residence. And then when the very wealthy person who wanted to be in an Amman residence isn't there, they put it back into the rental pool and Aman rents it out or as a hotel room and they split the revenue. So they not only get much bigger gross dollar volume for selling what is a $7 million condo, they get 14 million for it. They also get incremental recurring revenue from someone else who has sponsored and took all the capital risk. So if you can develop an amazing niche brand, you can do really well. And some amazing niche brands have developed specifically based on demographics. What do I mean by that? The fastest growing cohort in the world is the super wealthy. And the number of people who are worth More than $10 million has absolutely exploded globally. And so it used to be that the Four Seasons, the Man in Ordinary on the Ritz Carlton were sort of the high end brands. And then a series of like massive over the top, high experience, exceptional location brands emerged and went super luxury, right? Rosewood, Almond, Cheval Blanc, Six Senses, the OCOTA group, which includes my favorite hotel in the world, the Hotel Du Cap, they came in at the very they out luxuried luxury and they started charging 1500 2000, $5000 a night. Recognizing there are some people who have become totally price insensitive. And if they want to take their family somewhere on their limited time off, they have much more money than time. They will pay 5,000 bucks a night or 7 or 8,000 bucks a night to stay at the Six Senses in Thailand. And they are exceptional experiences down towards the middle end it's all about scale and cost and offering people a good value. And it's about scale at the back end. So these big kind of conglomerates that have multiple brands, they use the same backend, they use some of the same service and headquarters and infrastructure, and they will buy some of these brands. I think actually IHT purchased the almond. I'm not sure. Is that right? I can't remember. But anyways, I think that you are actually seeing, I don't want to call it fragmentation of brands, but you can now support a single brand because of the weapons of mass discovery, the thing that is dictating and shaping the global travel industry right now. Instagram. I did my 50th birthday in Scotland 60, and everyone there was complaining that Scotland had been overrun. Why? Because supposedly they invited 20 or 30 very, very influential Instagrammers influencers to Scotland two summers before, and they went apeshit. Scotland is like a giant Instagram orgy. It is spectacularly beautiful. And everyone saw all over the world that Scotland's amazing. And they thought, it's cool, we haven't been there. And they just said, the place is just overrun and they can't handle it. At the same time, some of those same influencers started mocking Mykonos and Ibiza and saying, look at this, $40 Cosmopolitan. Or look at these, look at how shitty this club is that I just paid $4,000 for a table. And supposedly, supposedly, Mykonos and Ibiza saw a serious decline in revenue last summer. Again, all brought to you by Instagram. But if you're at the pool at the Hotel du Cap and you Instagram at the Hotel du Cap doesn't need the scale of brand because their brand is singular and it stands out. And quite frankly, at the high end, it's sort of all about Instagram. But that's a thoughtful question. Anytime you want to talk hotels, come to the dog. Come to the dog. Best hotel in Istanbul, I wouldn't do the Four Seasons or in the Mandarin Oriental on the phosphorus. I would do the Soho House there, which is actually the old American Embassy. Best hotel in Paris used to be the Plaza Tonne for me. Now it's the Cheval Blanc. Oh, my God, that shit is genius. If you're. Again, if you're on a little bit of a budget, I like the Hawkson. There's a lot of really interesting, really interesting kind of little boutique hotels. Favorite hotel in Mexico, because you asked. I love the Rosewood Mayakoba. You feel like an alligator's gonna come out and grab you that's all I have. That's all I have. Question number two.

[Ethan Raab]

Hey Prof. G. Anyone who is familiar with you knows how interested you are in modern adolescence and specifically what it's like for young men to grow up in a modern world with social media and lack of in person connections. You mentioned on a recent podcast that you really enjoyed the Netflix show Adolescence. I was wondering if you could share your thoughts on what was so impactful for you with that show and what you think it demonstrated with respect to your views on masculinity, adolescence, and the effect of the modern world on young people. Thanks so much for all the insight and content that you provide. Cheers.

[Prav G]

I'm not sure I have a great take on this. I had trouble watching that show. I just. As the father of boys, it just. I'm not exaggerating. After I watched the first episode, every episode from that point forward, I had a drink before it because I wanted to watch it. I'm super interested in the domain. I thought it was so powerful and it just rattled me to the core. Like at the end of the day, I think we with our boys really early have to treat them to be tell them that being a boy, being a man, your transition to being a man is all about. You know, we talk a lot about being a provider in a capitalist society. I talk a lot about being a procreator. I think it's important you initiate contact with someone while making them feel safe, such that you can have children and being risk aggressive. But I think with boys we really have to play up the third leg of the stool of masculinity. And that is you're a protector. And I've just been struck by how many women have told me that in New York they don't feel safe, they don't feel safe on the subway. And it just sort of breaks my heart that when you hear women say that if they're walking down the street and a group of guys is coming towards them, they sometimes cross the street. And I'd like to think, and I have this aspirational view of masculinity, but I haven't lived that life that if a woman or someone who feels physically threatened immediately would look just the way you look. Who are the most masculine role models? Cops and fire people. You go to those people when you need protection. And it just breaks my heart that we're not. That people in our society don't look to men for protection, that they're scared of men. And I think what I took away is at a very early age we gotta first off acknowledge that masculinity and being a boy is a wonderful thing and to embrace it, but to really bring home the notion that your evolution from boyhood to manhood is around protection. And very much so. Ground zero for protection for any boy is protection of girls and women. And I think a lot of men feel this way. I know I felt this way when I was very young. I felt very protective of my mother. But also just heartbreaking that you see this kid. And what's fascinating about the program is it's not a whodunit, you know, who did it, but it's an exploration of why they did it. And it made me think a lot about fathering and how important it is to really understand what your kid's up to and his, his views on girls and, and violence and misogyny and more than anything, the thing that came to me was, you know, as parents and are you letting the Internet raise your kid? Because the thing is, if you're, you know, a lot of people, their nannies or other people or their school raises their kid right. My son's at Wellington College, this wonderful school. I know the school really well. I'm in contact with the people there. I've sat in on classes, I've spoken there. I have a pretty decent idea who is raising my kid. Whenever we've had a nanny or someone who spends a lot of time with our kid because my partner was working, we know that person really well. We have a really good sense of who's raising our kid. I don't know who's raising my 14 year old because he spends a lot of time on the Internet. And I'd like to think, oh, I'm smart, I'll figure it out. I haven't figured it out. I absolutely haven't figured it out. He spends way too much time on his phone. And anyone who says, oh, well, that's bad parenting, you don't have kids, they get their homework. If they can't be on their phone, they're ostracized from their peer group because that's how they communicate with each other. But I wonder if we're, as parents, I think it's a really good question, is who's raising your kid? And this story is just so rattling because it's clear that these good people just didn't know what influences were raising their kids. So what to do about it? No kid should be on social media under the age of 16. And by the way, my 14 year old is. So do as I say, not as I do, but I think we need federal legislation because there's this isolation effect. If you take your kid off of social media, 14 or 15, he gets more. He or she gets more depressed because all their friends are socializing. So unless it's, unless it's a collective band, it doesn't work. And I think there needs to be education at a very young age that's a bit, I don't even call it sexist, but identifies. It says, boys are stronger than girls and your default as you evolve to a man is protection and ground zero. That protection should be that males who are born with superior bone structure and muscle fiber and also are just prone to be more physical and more violent. That your muscle memory, your instinct needs to be around protection, specifically protection of girls and women. But I don't want to pretend that I garnered some incredible insight from it. I just found it incredibly rattling. And the one thing, the one thing I would just, it struck me is like, it just, I just kept asking myself, who is raising our sons? Do we really know who is raising our sons? Are we raising our sons or schools raising our sons? Or our algorithms that don't have our best interests at art raising our sons? Thanks for the question. We have one quick break and when we're back, we're diving into the depths of Reddit. Foreign.

[Scott Galloway]

Comes from quints. Sometimes mothers say, oh, you don't need to get me anything for Mother's Day, but you're an adult now and no, that's a trap. This Mother's Day, make sure you get her a gift as elegant and luxurious as she is with Quint. Gifts from Quints are high quality, they feel super thoughtful, and they're actually affordable, such as cashmere sweaters for $50, 14k, gold jewelry, Italian leather bags, fragrances, and more. The best part, all Quint's Items are priced 50 to 80% less in similar brands. Quint's actually sent some items to our producer, Claire. Claire, what did you think?

[Claire]

Everything from Quince is super soft, super well made, super luxe. No joke. I literally just ordered quince again today. I'm totally sold. Love quints.

[Prav G]

There you have it.

[Scott Galloway]

Thoughtful, timeless, totally her shop. Mother's Day at Quint, go to quintessential quince.com profg for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com profg to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com profg.

[Prav G]

Support for the show comes from Smartsheet.

[Scott Galloway]

Did you know that there's one human experience more universal than death and taxes? What do you think it is?

[Prav G]

Take a guess. Okay, we'll tell you. It's creativity. I know you're probably thinking, yeah, right, I'm not that creative. Or maybe you're thinking, I am creative.

[Scott Galloway]

But I just have so much trouble tapping into my creativity.

[Prav G]

And in that, my friend, you are not alone.

[Scott Galloway]

Because perhaps there is actually one thing more universally human than death and taxes and creativity.

[Prav G]

Distraction.

[Scott Galloway]

That's where smartsheet comes in.

[Prav G]

Smartsheet is the work management platform here to help clear clutter, break down barriers.

[Scott Galloway]

And streamline your workflows to allow your.

[Prav G]

Creativity to, you know, flow.

[Scott Galloway]

Its innovative platform lets your team find its rhythm no matter the obstacles.

[Prav G]

When roadblocks emerge, smartsheet empowers teams to.

[Scott Galloway]

Chart a new course, one where innovation thrives. We all have the power to tap into creative flow.

[Prav G]

We just need some help clearing away distractions.

[Scott Galloway]

And Smartsheet knows exactly how to do that. Smartsheet Work with flow.

[Prav G]

Learn [e-mail] Vox.

[Scott Galloway]

Support for the show comes from Grunds. If you're looking for a new tasty nutrition solution, then look no further than Grunds. It's a convenient, comprehensive formula packed into eight gummies a day. Grunds isn't a multivitamin, a greens gummy, or a prebiotic. It's all of those things, and then some at a fraction of the price. Their daily packs contain eight gummies because you just can't fit the amount of nutrients they do just into one gummy. Generic multivitamins only contain around seven to nine vitamins, but Grunds have more than 20 vitamins and minerals, plus more than 60 whole food ingredients. They actually provided us with a bit of science to explain what makes grunds different. Basically, 30% of the population has a gene that messes with how they absorb vitamins. But Gruns is methylated, which is a fancy way of saying their vitamins like B12 and folate can be absorbed by your body. Methylating is an expensive option for a lot of other companies, but Gruens is looking out for you. Plus, they're vegan and free of nuts, dairy and gluten, and they're made with no artificial colors or flavors. Get up to 45% off when you go to Grunds Co and use code profg. That's G R u n s.co using code profg for 45% off.

[Prav G]

Welcome back. We asked and Reddit delivered. Let's bust right into It Our Reddit question today comes from Ethan Raab. They say, or he says, hi, Scott, did you ever meet Elizabeth Holmes? What was your impression of her? Were you offered a chance to invest in Theranos? And if so, did you see through it or get caught up in the hype more broadly? What's your take on the fake it till you make it founder philosophy? Okay, a lot there. I'll come back to whether I know her or not. I didn't see it. I remember the COVID of Time showing her with a vial and she was, I think, the youngest billionaire or the youngest female billionaire at that point. There is a very strong gestalt in the valley of raise as much money as you can, become a hype machine. I mean, fakel till you make it. How many times has Elon Musk lied to us about when autonomous driving, Autonomous driving is a year away? I think he said in 2017. I mean, there's just no getting around it. Your ability to tell a story that verges on exaggeration, embellishment, adjectives, maybe even crosses the line at some point into fraud. I mean, the difference between storytelling and fraud sometimes, quite frankly, is your performance. So I think in the Valley there's unfortunately this gestalt that says exaggerate, get cheap capital, and then pull the future forward with your capital. Now, having said that, when you start lying about your numbers as that, I think it was a Nicola. Nicola, the guy who put a truck on a slanted hill and said that it was a motor driving the car. You know, that guy deserves to go to jail. But I believe if Adam Newman's board was not Japanese or driven by Masayoshi san and was worried about a loss of face, of saying I got fooled and his board went after him, I think there's a good chance Adam Newman would be in prison. And with Elizabeth Holmes, yeah, she lied to her investors. Her investors were sophisticated. No retail investor lost money and there was never really any health ramifications. It wasn't like anyone was taking an HIV test and, and got false results and as a result was hurt. So should she have been punished, fired, and maybe sent to prison? Yes. But what bothered me about the whole situation is she was sentenced to 10 years and I just find only 2 or 3% of unicorns are founded by women. And it struck me that, okay, yet we seem to found one. We seem to find one to put in prison for 10 years. So why? She's very unlikable. And I think that there's a weirdness in our society and misogyny, where a woman taking the position and taking on male attributes who ends up to be full of shit. We dislike that person more than a guy who's exaggerating or even lying. And I think she paid the price. And someone in her family, I won't say who, reached out to me and asked if I would openly advocate for a prison sentence and I didn't respond. I'm not going to get involved in that. But I wonder, had Adam Newman's board been angry and gone after him, if things would have turned different for him. And there's something that bothers me about a founder who ends up spending 10 years in prison is one of the 2% that has ovaries. There's just something uncomfortable there. The fake it till you make it. Never lie about your numbers, never lie to consumers that you're serving at that moment. But let's be honest, you have to paint a vision. I don't have an answer for you. I think it's gone too far. And what I have generally found, generally found is that the way I serve on a or served on a bunch of public company boards that the the people, the managers in public companies, at least traditionally that were the most respect, were the ones that under promised and over delivered. Having said that though, in private companies and startups, I mean, I can tell you how many business plans I see of people raising money and their ability, you know, and I would say 90% probably aren't going to hit those numbers. Anyways, that's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to Office hours of property media.com Again, that's office hourspropertymedia.com or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, not a sponsor, not a sponsor or an advertiser. Just post your questions on the ScottGalloway subreddit and we just might feature it on our next Reddit Hotline segment. What a thrill. This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez. Our intern is Dan Shalon. Drew Burrows is our Technical Director. Thank you for listening to the Prophet.

[Scott Galloway]

POD from the Vox Media Podcast Network.

[Prav G]

We will catch you on Saturday for no Mercy, no Malice, as read by George Hahn. And please follow our Prophet Markets pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.