
Loading summary
Scott Galloway
Support for Prop Tree comes from Viori.
Co-host
Oh my God. True story.
Scott Galloway
I am wearing totally coincidentally, guess what?
Co-host
Viori shorts.
Scott Galloway
Viori's high quality gym clothes are made to be versatile and stand the test of time. They sent me some to try out and here I am. For our listeners, vuori is offering 20% off your first purchase plus get free shipping on any US orders over $75 in free returns. Get yourself some of the most comfortable and versatile clothing on the planet. Vuori.com profg that's V-U-O-R-I.com profg exclusions apply. Visit the website for full terms and conditions.
Pete
Support for the show comes from Charles Schwab at Schwab. How you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices. You can invest and trade on your own. Plus get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award winning service, low costs and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more.
Doug
It's time to review the highlights. I'm joined by my co anchor Snoop.
David
Hey what up doe snoop?
Doug
Number one has to be getting iPhone 16 with Apple Intelligence AT T Mobile.
David
Yeah, you should hustle down AT T Mobile like a dog chasing a squirrel chasing a nut.
Doug
Number two at T mobile families can switch and save 20% on plans plus streaming services versus the other big guys.
David
What a deal. Y'all giving it away too fast. T Mobile slow down. Head to t mobile.com and get iPhone 16 on them.
Doug
Yeah, you can save on wireless and streaming versus the other big guys@t mobile.com switch Apple Intelligence requires iOS 18.1 or.
Co-host
Later welcome to Office Hours with Prof. G. This is the part of the show where we answer your questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to Office hours of prop gmedia.com Again, that's office hours of prop gmedia.com so with that first question.
Doug
Scott hey, longtime listener. My name's Doug. I'm an environmental consultant and I work on biodiversity and climate change issues across the US Often involving public private partnerships. I really appreciate your recent comments with regard to the interaction between businesses and politics and how unequal society has become. I'm wondering, is there a way for a business leader such as yourself to get together and work to reverse Citizens United, to provide some rational guardrails on campaign finance Maybe you can call yourselves the Super Friends. Thanks so much.
Co-host
Ah, the Super Friends. I like that. If I were a superhero, I think my power would be. What is my power? I don't know. The ability to pee three or four times in any given evening. It's like I wake up and I don't even think, oh, why am I waking up? I know I'm waking up. It's my bladder going, hey, your prostate's the size of a fucking grapefruit and it says it's time to pee. Even if it's not time to pee. Anyways, isn't that exciting? Isn't that why you come here? So Citizens United, you could argue if you were to reverse engineer a lot of the problems we have, it's, well, okay, it's that we send crazies. The majority of people in America now identify as independent, are somewhere in the middle on most issues and kind of think, okay, we can accommodate both sides and sort of come to some sort of agreement. Instead, we send far left crazies and far right craziest. In addition, because the incumbents can raise a lot more money and because there's no caps on how much money they can raise, it creates more and more incumbency. And not only that, corporations are now considered people or money is considered voice and free speech, such that if you're the pharmaceutical lobby and you want to give a bunch of money to a candidate, or better yet, the private equity lobby and you give $800,000 to Senator Kristen Sinema such that she is a holdout and says, I won't pass, I'll be the swing vote against the infrastructure bill unless you pull out this loophole such that some of the wealthiest people in the world, private equity billionaires, maintain carried interest loophole where they get long term capital gains or they get a lower tax rate on what is essentially a commission. Whereas if you sell a car and get a commission, you pay a much higher tax rate, this is nothing but pure grift for the rich that has been weaponized. So unless we put some sort of campaign finance limits on this and de gerrymander these districts, it's just not going to get better. There's other things you could do. Ranked choice voting final five where it's not just the crazies, it's people who across the spectrum. Lisa Murkowski is a fantastic moderate senator from Alaska. Why? Because they have final five voting in Alaska where everybody votes for the first, second, third and fourth candidate and the lower ones get kicked out and the other ones get votes, so you end up with the moderates. Have a shot if you will. Anyways, back to Citizens United. Following the 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited money on political campaigns, independent political spending surged over the past decade. Election related spending by non party independent groups skyrocketed to get this $4.5 billion compared to just 750 million 20 years prior. So it's up about six fold. Additionally, political campaigns are now spending more than ever. Between the presidential and congressional races, American political candidates spent a total of $16 billion this past election cycle. The overwhelming impact of Citizen United could be addressed in a few ways. The Supreme Court could revisit the decision. Good luck with that. Congress could propose a new amendment to limit corporate political spending. But the majority of them are such whores, why would they want to shut off the spigot? Right. Congress could pass laws to increase funding, transparency and cut off communication between campaigns and super PACs. We need a workaround here. If the Supreme Court isn't going to overturn Citizens United, we're going to have to come up with a bunch of hacks such that money gets out of D.C. because if you look at the fact that we pay twice as much as any other G7 nation for healthcare, despite the fact we have lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, higher rates of obesity, you can directly go to the weaponization of our elected representatives. Buy money from pharmaceutical, the health industrial complex, hospital systems, et cetera. So money and politics has been a real cancer. And I think your question is the correct one. Last night I watched Senator Michael Bennett give what I thought was just an outstanding grilling of RFK Jr. Who's up for Health and Human Services. Oh, that's a good idea. Let's have an anti vax conspiracy theorist decide the healthcare of our children. That makes sense. That makes sense. Anyways, the way I express affection or support for somebody is I send them money. So today I'm going to send money to Senator Michael Bennett and that is, I realize I'm part of the problem, but at a minimum, if they're going to fire bazookas at us, I'm going to get a Javelin missile or whatever they call it. Anyways, thanks for the question. Question number two.
Pete
Hi, Professor Galloway, my name is Pete from dc. My question is about how to ask for a raise and if it's always appropriate to do so. I'm an account executive for a medium sized tech company and had a decent 2024, exceeding my quota by about 30%. I'd like to ask for a raise because who doesn't like or need more money? But I'd be interested in hearing about times when people ask you for a ra, both when they've done it effectively and when they've done it ineffectively. Thank you.
Co-host
Thanks. This is a tough one. So one, I think that in a pre interview, typically a good firm will ask you to review yourself and you will have access to management throughout the year. I think it's okay to constantly check in and say, or not constantly, but regularly check in and say, how am I doing? These are my goals for the year. I feel as if I'm hitting them. And then when you typically come in for compensation once at the end of the year, they'll give you the number. And I think it's okay to ask questions about the number and also to express disappointment and say, you know, I don't feel as if I'm getting the type of compensation I'd hoped for or nor is warranted by my performance. Now, typically expressing that sort of disappointment won't result. I never change bonuses or decisions around raises. And I tell my employees these decisions only happen once a year. Otherwise there's a line in my office of people every two months thinking, oh, I just did a good job, I'm going to go in and ask for a raise or a promotion. So these discussions need to happen once a year. I think what's helpful is if you have senior level sponsorship in the organization, it's just to be very transparent, saying, I'm looking to make more money here. What do you think I can do? How am I doing? And also, just to be honest with your direct reporter, your boss, saying, I'm ambitious, I want to make more money, I want to be promoted. What do you think I need to do to get there? Instead of saying, I want more money, saying, what do you think I need to do to increase the likelihood that I'll be promoted? Or register an increase in compensation. And if you don't get the compensation you want, I think it's okay to say I'm disappointed. I was expecting more, I was hoping for more. Also, at the end of the day, and there's evidence that shows this, the people who typically make more money on average are people who switch jobs every three to five years. Because this is the issue with employers. You have a tendency to see employees through the lens through which they were hired. And that is we romanticize strangers. We had an editor in chief who I have been working with since he was 22, 25 years ago, and I see him as Jason, the recent Yale grad who I was paying $60,000 a year to in 1995 or 98. And I realize now, no, he's a 40 something year old man who is very talented and should be making two, $300,000 a year. But I still see him as Jason. And the folks who leave typically take advantage of this. How attracted we are to strangers, if you will. So if you really don't feel like you're getting good compensation or being fairly treated, I would talk to your mentor or your boss there saying, yeah, I was unhappy with my compensation. But at the end of the day, if you really are unhappy with your compensation and don't feel as if they're likely to change it, quite frankly, the easiest way to increase your compensation if you are in fact being underpaid is to let the market decide and go out and try and find another job. And what I did every three to five years at NYU is I would get an offer from a competitor institution and then I would go back and say, full transparency, I don't want to leave nyu, but according to whoever, Cornell or Columbia or Wharton, I'm worth this, I need you to match it. That appears to be my market rate. And quite frankly, had I not gone in and said, you have to develop your own currency, my currency was putting butts in seats. My course quickly became one of the most popular courses in the marketing department and in the school. And I would go in and say, I need more money and. Or I would do a market check. So what are we going to do? We're going to check in with our boss and see how you're doing. You're going to lay out your expectations and say, or your desires. You want to get promoted and you want an increase in salary and ask for advice. How can I make sure I'm tracking for that? And if you don't get the compensation of the promotion, Promotion in a very thoughtful, civilized way saying, I got to be honest, I'm disappointed. And at the end of the day, you have to show a willingness to leave and that is start doing a market check if you feel you're being unfairly compensated. Appreciate the question. We have one quick break before our final question. Stay with us.
Scott Galloway
This episode is brought to you by Crescent Family Office. Entrepreneurs understand the challenges of building a successful business. You've probably spent years pouring your heart into different ventures and maybe even had some serious wins. Still, I bet a lot of these successes came with headaches. Complex financial planning, optimizing tax strategies and timely exit planning. It can be overwhelming to figure those things out, and charting a path forward can take a lot of time away from what you love most. If that sounds familiar, you might want to check out Crescent, their prestigious family office for CEO founders and entrepreneurs. Crescent's advisory teams can simplify your financial life. They handle the tedious stuff behind the scenes, freeing you up to focus on growing your business and enjoying your life. It's the sort of help that can be transformative, optimize your life and optimize your wealth with Crescent. If you want the freedom to follow what really matters, you should schedule a call with a crescent founder@crescentcapital.com we are not clients of Crescent. There are no material conflicts other than this paid endorsement. All investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Support for prophecy comes from Shipstation Everyone knows that work can get chaotic, but if you're in charge of order fulfillment for an E commerce business, you know that it's its own special kind of chaos.
Co-host
So if you're looking to quell some.
Scott Galloway
Of the volatility that life always seems to find, you can sign up for Shipstation. There you can save hours and money every month by shipping from all your stores with one login, automating repetitive tasks and finding the best rates among all global carriers. Shipstation can help grow with your business no matter how big it gets. You can lead your business into the future with smart features and automations that boost efficiency and save you time. You can also seamlessly integrate with services and selling channels you already use and manage orders on one easy dashboard. That means you can deliver a better customer experience with industry leading scalable features that help ensure accuracy, get shipments out the door faster and keep customers happy. Calm the chaos of order fulfillment with the shipping software that delivers switch to ShipStation today. Go to shipstation.com and use code Prof. G to sign up for your free trial. That's shipstation.com code Prof.
Co-host
Giving.
Scott Galloway
Support for Prophgy comes from Nutrafol Thinning hair is a very common, very frustrating problem that many men deal with. But there's so much more going on than what you see in the mirror. There are so many internal factors that might affect your hairline like stress, nutrition, even lifestyle. Luckily, Nutrafol is here to help. Nutrafol is the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand trusted by over one and a half million people. You may see thicker, stronger hair with less shedding in just three to six months with Nutrafol. Their physician formulated products support healthy hair growing from within by targeting key root causes of thinning, such as hormones, aging, stress, nutrition, lifestyle and metabolism. Start your hair growth journey with Nutrafol. For a limited time, Nutrafol is offering our listeners $10 off your first month subscription and free shipping. When you go to nutrafol.com and enter the promo code Prof. G. Find out why over 4,500 healthcare professionals and stylists recommend NutraFool for healthier hair. NutraFool.com spelled n u t r a f o l.com promo code Prof. G that's NutraFool.com promo code ProfG.
Co-host
Welcome back.
David
Question number three hello Scott, I'm David from Mexico. I'm a longtime listener and have learned a lot through the pub and your books. Thank you for that. I am 30 years old, currently living in Monterrey expanding the family construction business. My wife and I got married in 2023 and are currently enjoying our time as a couple. We honestly have a great relationship and have been together for 10 years. Lately we have started to discuss the best timing of when to have kids. We are both working in good and stable jobs, living a good life and have been saving and investing, but by no means have our future secured. She prefers sooner rather than later, while I prefer to wait a little bit longer and prioritize our economic security and time as a couple. What are your thoughts about when to have children? What are some factors we should consider in our decision and is there any advice you could give us? I would really appreciate your opinion. Thank you.
Co-host
David from Mexico. This is such a personal decision, so you should take everything I say with a grain of salt because I'm going to tell you kind of my way, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's the right way. I think these at the end of the day are decisions that you, your wife, and quite frankly your sperm and her eggs. Because sometimes it's just not easy to get pregnant and sometimes it's super easy. By the way, probably under the auspice of tmi, my girlfriend and I decided I didn't want to have kids and she said, well, I have to have kids otherwise we can't be together. And I said, well, I don't want to get married. And she called my bluff and said I don't even get married to have kids. So we pulled the goalie and started having unprotected sex. Oh my God. And literally I've had two kind of, I don't know what you call it, surreal, mystical things happen to me. 14 months after my mom passed away, she came to me and it was so real. It just felt real. And she said, I just want you to know I'm doing fine and I love you, but it was so real. It felt. I don't know how to explain it. That's the first one of two. And the other one was after my girlfriend and I had fornicated in Vegas at CES of all places. I went into the bathroom and I came out and I knew we had just conceived a son. And I said to her, we just conceived a son and what do you know? Pregnancy test. Bright blue. And now the purpose of my life and my biggest joy is my son, who's now 17 and tied for that position as the son we had three years later. It's so funny. You spend your whole life trying not to get pregnant and then sometimes it's not easy to get pregnant anyways. Not what you asked. Look, I'm not sure there's ever a perfect time to have kids. I would argue that it's very kind of base pillars you need in place. One is you have to have a partner that you think is competent and that you can see being with for the next 18 years at least. Because once you have kids, you're in each other's lives for 18 years. Even if you get divorced, you're in each other's lives. Some semblance of economic security. You don't have to be rich, but not strained. If you're strained now and you throw a kid into the mix, wow, that's a lot of stress. So having a little bit of economic security and some professional trajectory, if you have those things, I would err on the side of doing it because there is never a perfect time to bring, you know, this little thing into your life that's going to demand constant attention, additional cost and a lot of unknowns. There's never a time it's like, okay, this is definitely the time. And there really is an advantage, I think, to being a young parent. Having said that I had kids later, it was nice to have some economic security. I was a little bit more thoughtful. Again, really personal decisions. Do you have a support group around you? Do you have family or young parents that could be involved in the kids lives? One of my biggest blessings is that our in laws are fairly young and they've played a hugely positive and supportive role in raising our children. So that's been a real factor. So I think there are a variety of things, but if you get to what I'd call 70 or 80%, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. And what I mean by that is if you're mostly kind of there, then I would just go there and start procreating. I just don't think there's ever a perfect time. And I have found I was sort of wandering. I don't think you have to have kids to be happy. I don't think kids are the right decision for everybody. But I know that for me, having kids has been, you know, the first time I've ever felt. Felt a sense of purpose. So anyways, what am I saying? Get on it. Get on it. Make sweet, sweet love. Procreate. Have progeny. That's right. Progeny. That's right. Anyways, congratulations to you on a nice time in your life. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to office hourspropertymedia.com Again, that's office hourspropertymedia.com this episode.
Scott Galloway
Was produced by Jennifer Sanchez.
Co-host
Our intern is Dan Shalon. Drew Burrows is our technical director.
Scott Galloway
Thank you for listening to the Prophecy Pod from the Vox Media Podcast network. We will catch you on Saturday for no mercy, no malice, as read by George Hahn. And please follow our Prophecy Markets pod.
Co-host
Wherever you get Your pods for new.
Scott Galloway
Episodes every Monday and Thursday.
The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway Episode: The Lasting Impact of Citizens United, How to Ask for a Raise at Work, and When Is It the Right Time to Have Kids? Release Date: February 12, 2025
In this episode of The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway, host Scott Galloway delves into three pivotal topics: the enduring effects of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, strategies for effectively asking for a raise at work, and considerations for determining the optimal time to start a family. Through engaging discussions and insightful analysis, Galloway offers listeners valuable perspectives and actionable advice.
Timestamp: 02:08 - 06:52
Question by Doug:
Doug, an environmental consultant, poses a critical question regarding the potential for business leaders to collaborate in reversing the Citizens United decision to implement rational safeguards on campaign finance. He suggests a coalition of influential business figures, creatively termed the "Super Friends," to address the growing influence of money in politics.
Scott Galloway's Response:
Galloway provides an in-depth analysis of the consequences stemming from the Citizens United ruling, which has allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited funds on political campaigns. He highlights the surge in independent political spending—from $750 million two decades ago to $4.5 billion recently—and the escalation of total election-related expenditures, reaching $16 billion in the latest cycle.
Key Points:
Incumbency Advantage: The ruling has entrenched incumbency, enabling established politicians to raise and sustain significant financial support, making it increasingly difficult for new candidates to compete.
Weaponization of Money: Corporations and wealthy individuals use their financial power to influence legislation and policy, often leading to outcomes that favor specific industries over the public good. For instance, Galloway cites the pharmaceutical lobby's substantial donations to sway legislative decisions.
Potential Remedies:
Notable Quote:
"Money and politics has been a real cancer. And I think your question is the correct one." — Scott Galloway [04:30]
Insights:
Galloway emphasizes the profound impact of Citizens United on American democracy, where financial prowess increasingly dictates political success and policy direction. He advocates for systemic changes, though acknowledges the significant challenges in achieving legislative or judicial reforms. Galloway suggests that business leaders must recognize their role in perpetuating or challenging this status quo, hinting at the necessity for collective action to restore balance in political financing.
Timestamp: 06:52 - 11:24
Question by Pete:
Pete, an account executive at a medium-sized tech company, seeks advice on the appropriateness and effectiveness of requesting a raise. Having exceeded his quota by 30% in 2024, Pete is contemplating the best approach to secure additional compensation.
Scott Galloway's Response:
Galloway offers a comprehensive guide on navigating salary negotiations, emphasizing the importance of timing, preparation, and strategic communication.
Key Points:
Regular Check-Ins: Encourage continuous dialogue with management about performance and career goals rather than ad-hoc requests for raises. This fosters a transparent environment where compensation discussions are part of the annual review process.
Senior-Level Sponsorship: Building strong relationships with senior leaders can enhance advocacy for your compensation and career advancement, making it more likely for raises and promotions to align with your contributions.
Market Awareness: Understanding your market value is crucial. Galloway suggests that employees who switch jobs every three to five years often achieve higher earnings, as staying with the same employer can lead to being undervalued over time.
Promotion and Compensation Strategy: Instead of solely asking for more money, frame the conversation around career progression. Discuss what milestones or achievements are necessary to warrant both a promotion and a corresponding salary increase.
Willingness to Move: Demonstrating readiness to explore external opportunities can incentivize employers to adjust compensation to retain valuable talent.
Notable Quote:
"The people who typically make more money on average are people who switch jobs every three to five years." — Scott Galloway [08:15]
Insights:
Galloway underscores the importance of proactive career management and strategic negotiation. He advocates for employees to position themselves as valuable assets with clear contributions and market worth. By fostering open communication with employers and being prepared to seek opportunities elsewhere, professionals can better navigate compensation dynamics and achieve financial growth.
Timestamp: 14:51 - 19:59
Question by David:
David, a 30-year-old from Monterrey, seeks guidance on the optimal timing for starting a family. Despite enjoying a stable relationship and having steady jobs, David and his wife have differing views on when to have children—she prefers earlier, while he favors delaying to ensure greater economic security and to enjoy their time as a couple.
Scott Galloway's Response:
Galloway approaches this deeply personal decision with a blend of humor and pragmatism, offering considerations that extend beyond mere financial stability.
Key Points:
Economic Security: While not necessitating wealth, having a stable financial foundation is crucial. Introducing a child into a strained economic situation can exacerbate stress and impact family dynamics.
Relationship Stability: Ensuring a strong, competent partnership is essential, as raising children demands prolonged cooperation and mutual support. Galloway emphasizes the importance of envisioning a long-term commitment, irrespective of marital status.
Support Systems: Access to a reliable support network, including family or community resources, can significantly ease the challenges of parenthood.
Flexibility and Readiness: Acknowledging that there is seldom a perfect time, Galloway advises prioritizing foundational aspects like emotional readiness and the ability to adapt to the unforeseen demands of raising children.
Personal Fulfillment: For some, children provide a profound sense of purpose and joy, as Galloway shares his own transformative experiences with fatherhood.
Notable Quote:
"There's never a perfect time to bring, you know, this little thing into your life that's going to demand constant attention, additional cost and a lot of unknowns." — Scott Galloway [16:45]
Insights:
Galloway highlights that the decision to have children intertwines with various personal and economic factors. He encourages couples to weigh their readiness across multiple dimensions, including financial stability, relationship strength, and support networks. Ultimately, he advocates for making a well-rounded decision that aligns with both partners' values and circumstances, recognizing that while timing is significant, the foundational pillars of stability and support are paramount.
In this episode, Scott Galloway adeptly navigates complex societal and personal issues, offering listeners a nuanced understanding of political financing's ramifications, career advancement strategies, and the profound considerations involved in family planning. His insights encourage proactive engagement, informed decision-making, and a balanced approach to personal and professional growth.
Listeners are encouraged to reflect on these topics, apply the strategies discussed, and consider their unique circumstances when making consequential life decisions.
Notable Mentions:
Campaign Finance Statistics:
"Political campaigns are now spending more than ever. Between the presidential and congressional races, American political candidates spent a total of $16 billion this past election cycle." — Scott Galloway [05:30]
Economic and Healthcare Comparison:
Galloway draws parallels between political spending and broader economic issues, such as healthcare costs, to illustrate the pervasive influence of money in various sectors.
Final Thoughts:
Scott Galloway's ability to dissect multifaceted issues with clarity and depth makes this episode a valuable resource for listeners seeking to understand and navigate the intersections of politics, career, and personal life. By addressing real-world challenges and offering pragmatic solutions, Galloway empowers his audience to take informed actions towards achieving economic security, professional success, and fulfilling personal lives.