
Loading summary
Geico Advertiser
We all do it. You have a night for yourself, but don't like the sound of the silence, so you turn on the TV just for the ambiance. It's a little trick that helps you feel like you've got company and aren't alone. And other insurers, well, they may make you feel alone, but when you switch to Geico, you've got claims reps available around the clock. So whenever you need, you'll have people around to help. And let's turn on the washing machine just for good measure. Isn't that soothing?
George Hahn
It feels good to have support. It feels good to Geico.
Odoo Advertiser
Support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, E commerce and more. And the best part, Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you try Odoo for free@odoo.com that's o d o o.com support for this show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all in one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, E commerce and more. And the best part, Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you try Odoo for free@odoo.com that's o d o-o.com.
George Hahn
Welcome to the week from Prof. G Media where we break down what mattered and what it all means. I'm George Hahn and it's Friday, June 19th. Today, the biggest IPO in history finally landed, minting the world's first trillionaire. Then is the Iran war over? And finally, historian Heather Cox Richardson on expertise, power and America's future at 250. Let's get into it. SpaceX went public this week. After years of waiting, the largest IPO in American history finally landed, opening at $150 a share, an 11% jump from its offering price and climbing from there. By day three, SpaceX was briefly worth more than Amazon Elon Musk is now the world's first trillionaire. But Scott wasn't celebrating his argument. What happened this week wasn't a market event. It was financial engineering.
Scott
And what I don't think people are focused enough on here and there's been news on it, but it's really, I think the whole shooting match is that Musk threatened not to go public on the Nasdaq unless they waive the 12 month requirements for him to be included in the NASDAQ 100. So they backed down, they blinked. The S and P said no, the Dow Jones said no. But the NASDAQ blinked and the result is they're immediately included in these indices. If it's at $2 trillion and there's 50 trillion of market cap in the NASDAQ 100, that means all the indices that track the NASDAQ 100 now have to put 4% of their assets under management into SpaceX stock, creating anywhere between 20 and call it $50 billion in additional demand that no IPO benefits from. In addition, traditional IPO rules are that you have to issue at least 10% of your shares. They didn't, they issued 5%. So massive artificial demand or demand that no one else has benefited from 5 from constrained supply that no one else has been able to manufacture. And what you have is a pop, a 20% or 25% pop on what I think is manufactured scarcity. Now the question is where do you go from here? And I would argue someone called me and said I have access to shares, should I do it? I said I think you should. But I would look at this as a trade, not as an investment because eventually that manufactured scarcity begins to leak.
George Hahn
When the dust settled, SpaceX was trading at 112 times last year's sales. For context, Meta went public at 28 times, trailing revenue, Google at 10. And just as investors were digesting the biggest IPO in history, another piece of the AI story emerged. OpenAI's financials leaked and the numbers were staggering. Here's self proclaimed AI skeptic Ed Zetron who first reported on the leak.
Ed Zetron
So last year OpenAI spent about $34 billion to make about 13.01. Sorry, oh, $7 billion. And had about $22 billion in cash at the end of the year lost about $21 billion. That 38, $39 billion number is what I would describe as Gap voodoo. There is some very strange stuff and I'll be going into this in future episodes going on in the balance sheet and everything with this company. They turned from a nonprofit to a for profit, though they've remained profitless last year, which means that they have. Their net loss is quite strange. It's like $38.5 billion. But the number I like to come back to is they lost $21 billion from operations and they spent astronomical amounts on sales and marketing. They spent $7.5 billion on cost of revenue, $19.18 billion in R& D. But that sales and marketing cost, that $5.73 billion, is one I really like to hammer on. Because what it's like, there's just like, it's just like, excuse me, well, how much did you spend?
George Hahn
How much of today's AI boom is being driven by fundamentals? And how much is being driven by the belief that someone else will pay even more tomorrow? Morningstar recently estimated SpaceX's fair value at roughly $780 billion, less than a third of where it's currently trading. And on markets this week, Howard Marks, co founder and co chairman of Oaktree Capital Management, put the moment in historical perspective.
Howard Marks
So I wrote in a memo recently this year, and I think it's true that if this technological innovation with its exuberance doesn't produce a money losing bubble, it'll be the first. Now it could happen. You can't rule these things out. And maybe this is a good time for me to introduce the rejoinder of the, of the optimist. What do they say? This time it's different. Okay, that was true about the railroads, it was true about radio, it was true about computers and the Internet. But this time it's different. And this time we have a development of incalculable, unlimitable value. So this time it's really true that there's no price too high. That's what they say. But the problem with that, Ed, is they always say that this time it's different, is never different. And they've said it in each of those bubbles that I mentioned, I think. So nobody, including me, should say definitively that this is a bubble, that the people who invest in these early stages of AI will lose their money, that the people who, who invest in the companies you named will pay prices that they'll never see again. But you must be alert to the possibility.
George Hahn
The Shiller PE ratio, a measure of how expensive stocks are relative to long term earnings, now sits above 40. The last time it got this high was 1999. Back then, investors believed the Internet had changed the rules. Now maybe AI has. We are officially in dot com territory. We'll be right back after the break.
Narrator/Host
Support for the show comes from LinkedIn if you're a small business owner, you don't need me to tell you how much hiring great people matters, but the time and resources you have to spend to get it right are precious commodities. Sourcing, connecting with and screening candidates can quickly eat into time better spent on your customers. That's where LinkedIn Hiring Pro comes in. It's designed to be your hiring partner, helping you source the right candidates faster. That way you can hire with confidence without making it feel like a full time job. LinkedIn hiring pro simplifies the entire process all the way from writing your job post to shortlisting candidates and running AI powered initial interviews. Plus it does it all through a conversational interface where you can just describe what you're looking for in plain, plain language. LinkedIn says nearly 60% of hires find someone to interview within a week. With Hiring Pro, you spend less time searching and more time connecting with the right talent. So instead of sifting through piles of resumes, you get a tight, high quality shortlist that actually moves things forward. Join the 2.7 million small businesses using LinkedIn to hire get started by posting your job for free@LinkedIn.com Prof. Terms and conditions apply. Support for the show comes from Cohere As AI advances, one thing matters more than ever Staying in control. Most AI comes with strings attached like sharing your data and infrastructure or compromising your independence. With Cohere, you don't have to give up control to gain capability.
Scott
You can have both.
Narrator/Host
Cohere started seven years ago with a bold mission scale enterprise intelligence without sacrificing sovereignty. Their solution? AI that leaves you in charge of your data and infrastructure, allowing you to maintain your competitive edge. It's designed for enterprises, governments and organizations that refuse to give up control in pursuit of innovation. From frontier models to out of the box tools, Cohere gives you everything you need to build and deploy secure scalable AI that drives growth and delivers results. Their platform is designed around your business with models that can be customized and trained on your proprietary data so the solutions are uniquely yours and control doesn't stop at customization. Cohere is built with multi layered protections, access and industry certified security standards that help safeguard your data while supporting privacy compliance and other requirements. As AI continues to transform every industry, Cohere gives you the power to put it to work today, on your terms. Take charge of your AI with Cohere. To learn more, visit cohere.com Vox.
Geico Advertiser
We all do it. You have a night for yourself, but don't like the sound of the silence, so you turn on the TV just for the ambiance. It's a little trick that helps you feel like you've got company and aren't alone. And other insurers, well, they may make you feel alone. But when you switch to geico, you've got claims reps available around the clock. So whenever you need, you'll have people around to help. And let's turn on the washing machine just for good measure. Isn't that soothing?
George Hahn
It feels good to have support. It feels good to geico. Welcome back. After 107 days of war, the United States and Iran announced what the White House called a breakthrough. The problem? It's not exactly a deal, it's a framework or as Scott says, a memorandum of understanding, a 60 day negotiating period meant to produce an actual agreement. Later, the hardest questions, nuclear enrichment, sanctions, relief, frozen assets remain unresolved. On raging moderates this week, Scott and Jessica Tarlov discussion.
Scott
And then the uncomfortable truth that no one wants to own up to is that Iran has way more leverage after the escalation than before it.
Narrator/Host
We come out of this weaker, they come out of it stronger.
Heather Cox Richardson
Let me just repeat that.
Scott
Any honest analysis of this.
Narrator/Host
Iran comes out of this stronger, we
Heather Cox Richardson
come out of it weaker.
Scott
Your thoughts?
Unnamed Analyst
I wholeheartedly agree with you and would just add that even, even if they got exactly the same deal, the fact that they know that they can shut down the Strait of Hormuz whenever they want and hold the world hostage is an enormous bargaining chip. And you know, we're quibbling over the Iranians basically saying, no, we're not, it's not going to be toll free. Right. Like we can work towards that perhaps, but it's not going to go from, you know, 60 to 0. Right. When this reopens tomorrow or when the blockade gets lifted.
George Hahn
Ian Bremmer joined the show earlier this week and made a similar point. His argument, even if the final terms resemble the old nuclear agreement, the geopolitical context has changed dramatically.
Ian Bremmer
Well, first, one obvious thing is that the JCPOA was not a unilateral U.S. deal. It involved the Europeans. It also involved the Chinese and the Russians. So you had a lot of countries that had various degrees of influence, inequities in their relationships with Iran, that had a stake in ensuring that the deal actually held up, that the inspections actually went ahead, that the sanctions that remained on Iran remained on Iran, all of these things. So that's one point is that this new deal, it's only gonna be the Americans. And if the Iranians feel like they have more leverage going forward, then breaking an agreement that's only with the United States is less consequential than breaking a deal that involves countries like Russia and China that Iran really does not want to antagonize for other reasons.
George Hahn
The broader concern isn't just what's in the deal, but what the war accomplished. After months of escalation, billions spent, and global energy markets repeatedly thrown into turmoil, we're left with an uncomfortable question. Did the United States end up with a better outcome than than the one it started with? On this week's Conversations episode, Scott spoke with historian Heather Cox Richardson. As America prepares to celebrate its 250th birthday, they reflected on power, expertise and why so many voters have become skeptical of institutions.
Heather Cox Richardson
Here's Heather and one of the things that jumps out to me about the people in power right now is the degree to which they have simply said, well, I'm gonna put the best people in charge, or I read a book, I then can go in and I can negotiate Middle east peace in a way that nobody who's studied this and been trained and so on has been able to do for 40 years. And the thing about that is we have never put those people at the highest levels of our government before, the idea that you just have a hotline to the universe or God or to intelligence. And in this moment, it seems to me that that idea overlaps strongly with Trump's sort of fascist, traditional ideas about some people being better than others. And that, I think is interesting because I think that's one of the reasons that evangelicals adhere to him as closely as they do. And I don't really know how to grapple with that. What do you think about that?
I think in America, it has become a national pastime of being critical of our government. And I would argue our government is the best performing organization in history. And I think we have just taken for granted at every level how thoughtful and credentialed people in the CDC are and the diplomats who try and hammer out and cross the T's and dot the I's of an incredibly complex deal like this, and that we have essentially gutted and neutered the competence of the best organization in the world. And Americans have taken for granted, believing that these things just operate on some sort of autopilot. And I think we're about to figure out in a very painful way that, no, there were very smart people working at the tsa. There were very smart people working in the irs, the cdc, those people were there for a reason. And when we decide to take out our entire Iranian diplomatic corps staff, our intelligence agencies and our security apparatus with loyalists as opposed to people have any background that eventually you end up with poor execution and I think a lot of this is our fault. I think a lot of Americans have taken for granted the commitment and expertise that is resident in our government, and I think that those chickens are coming home to roost.
George Hahn
We spent the week talking about big promises that AI will change everything, that a fragile peace will hold, that the right leader can succeed where institutions have failed. Maybe all of that turns out to be true. But history has a way of separating confidence from competence, and eventually the results speak for themselves. We'll be back next Friday with a fresh edition of the week from Prof. G Media, breaking down what mattered and what it all means. I'm George Hahn. Have a bangin weekend.
Geico Customer
When I scraped my car in that parking garage, I was worried that it could be a long process to take care of it. Like a landscaper's first day trimming a hedge maze.
Narrator/Host
I have definitely already been here.
George Hahn
Now was it left right or right left?
Narrator/Host
Well, maybe I'll cut a path out and find my way back later.
Geico Customer
But it wasn't like that. I filed a claim in under two minutes on the Geico app and they handled it from there. It was taken care of almost as as far quickly as it happened.
George Hahn
It feels good to get help quick. It feels good to Geico.
Ryan Reynolds
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this but anyone can get the same premium wireless for 15amonth plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do@mintmobile.com
Heather Cox Richardson
Switch upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month Required intro rate first 3 months only then full price plan options available, taxes and extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com
Athletic Brewing Company Advertiser
Athletic Brewing Company Crafts Award winning non alcoholic beers for those who want to be part of every round. With over 185 flavor awards, they're exceptional NA beers that fit your lifestyle and any social occasion. Summer's full of good times and Athletic fits right in. Go to athleticbrewing.com to have brews delivered to your door or find them at a bar, restaurant or store near you near Beer Athletic Brewing Co. Fit for all times.
Episode: The Week: SpaceX, Iran, and the World's First Trillionaire
Date: June 19, 2026
Host: Scott Galloway
Guest Contributors: Ed Zetron, Howard Marks, Ian Bremmer, Heather Cox Richardson, Jessica Tarlov
This week’s episode breaks down monumental events in business, tech, and geopolitics: SpaceX’s historic IPO and Elon Musk becoming the first trillionaire; new revelations about OpenAI’s shaky financials and the frenzy in AI investment; and the latest in U.S.-Iran diplomacy after over 100 days of conflict. The episode also features a conversation with historian Heather Cox Richardson about the fragility of expertise and institutional trust as America approaches its 250th birthday.
[01:54 – 08:26]
Record-Breaking Numbers:
Financial Engineering Over Fundamentals:
Skepticism About Sustainability:
[04:38 – 08:26]
Shock Value in OpenAI’s Numbers:
Bubble Warnings:
Meta-Perspective:
[11:56 – 14:44]
A Framework, Not Peace:
Who Came Out Stronger?
New Geopolitical Context:
Lingering Uncertainty:
[14:44 – 17:48]
Crisis of Expertise:
Institutions on Autopilot?
Scott Galloway (03:04):
“Musk threatened not to go public on the Nasdaq unless they waive the 12 month requirements for him to be included in the NASDAQ 100... that means all the indices... have to put 4% of their assets under management into SpaceX stock, creating anywhere between 20 and call it $50 billion in additional demand that no IPO benefits from.”
Ed Zetron (05:12):
“They turned from a nonprofit to a for profit, though they've remained profitless last year... They lost $21 billion from operations and they spent astronomical amounts on sales and marketing.”
Howard Marks (06:49):
“If this technological innovation with its exuberance doesn't produce a money losing bubble, it'll be the first... the rejoinder of the optimist: What do they say? This time it’s different... The problem with that is, they always say that.”
Heather Cox Richardson (15:26):
“The idea that you just have a hotline to the universe or God or to intelligence... overlaps strongly with Trump’s sort of fascist, traditional ideas about some people being better than others.”
Heather Cox Richardson (16:24):
“Our government is the best performing organization in history... we have just taken for granted at every level how thoughtful and credentialed people in the CDC are... And when we decide to take out our entire Iranian diplomatic corps staff... with loyalists as opposed to people [with] any background that eventually you end up with poor execution.”
This episode serves as a reality check on headline-grabbing stories: beneath the hype of trillion-dollar valuations and supposed diplomatic “breakthroughs,” the hosts and guests urge skepticism, historical perspective, and renewed respect for real expertise. As the nation approaches a milestone birthday, the importance—and fragility—of institutional competence is a recurring theme.