Podcast Summary: The Prosecutors - Episode 304: West Memphis 3 Part 6
Podcast Information:
- Title: The Prosecutors
- Host/Author: PodcastOne (Alice and Brett)
- Description: A true crime podcast offering a unique prosecutorial perspective on infamous cold cases. Each week, Alice and Brett delve into murder, mayhem, disappearances, and more, providing insights from their experience as prosecutors.
- Episode: 304. West Memphis 3 Part 6
- Release Date: May 6, 2025
- Artwork: Custom case art by Hannah Hill Instagram
Introduction
In the sixth and final installment of their deep dive into the West Memphis Three case, hosts Alice and Brett continue their meticulous examination of one of America's most controversial cold cases. Building upon previous discussions, this episode navigates through critical developments in the investigation, offering listeners an insider's perspective on the prosecutorial process.
Timeline of Investigation: May 10 to May 27
May 10:
The podcast picks up with Damien Echols' first interview with the police. Alice emphasizes the importance of this interaction, noting that Damien provided information warranting further investigation. Brett highlights the overwhelming volume of tips the police received, underscoring the chaotic nature of the initial investigation.
Alice [04:25]: "Many tips you can just dispose of, but many of them you do have to follow up on."
May 11:
Police investigate Chris Wall, a 19-year-old mentioned by Pam Hobbs for interacting with younger kids. After passing a polygraph test and establishing an alibi, Wall is eliminated as a suspect. Brett reflects on the "shotgun approach" of the investigation, indicating a lack of focused strategy.
Brett [06:07]: "This investigation, whatever it is, is not organized."
May 12:
The focus shifts to Michael Griffin, who suggests that Michael and David Wren might have committed the murders to join a cult led by Murray Ferris and Chris Luttrell—the very cult Damien Echols has been associated with. Additionally, Kenneth Cagle and Steven Brown are investigated but subsequently cleared due to airtight alibis.
May 13 - May 16:
Richard Cummings, a local known for invasive behavior, becomes a suspect after police search his home. They find knives, a club, and magazine cutouts of female models, raising suspicions about his potential involvement. Alice posits that if the West Memphis Three are innocent, the true perpetrator might lie among these briefly investigated individuals.
Alice [16:53]: "If the West Memphis three didn't do it and you eventually found out who did, I think that person's name would be in these files."
May 17 - May 27:
The investigation intensifies with multiple individuals being questioned and cleared:
- Robert Andrus and Charles Carter: Both are cleared due to solid alibis.
- Joanie Brown: Provides hearsay accounts implicating Damien and others, though credibility issues arise as Whitney Nix later denies hearing any confession.
- Aaron Hutchinson: His mother, Vicky, initiates an undercover attempt to elicit a confession from Damien Echols, which ultimately yields no substantive evidence.
Brett [41:19]: "There are a lot of interesting characters in this case, and we're naming all of them to show what the police did."
Analysis of Investigative Tactics
Alice and Brett critique the police methodology, pointing out the disorganized "shotgun approach" rather than a methodical, concentric search starting from close relations to the victims. They express concern over the heavy reliance on polygraph tests and the rapid dismissal of potential suspects without thorough examination.
Brett [12:33]: "They really are investigating all over the place, right? Not just honing in on one person."
Witness Statements and Reliability
The episode delves into the reliability of various witness testimonies:
- Brandy Wilson's Account: A young witness claims to have overheard Damien discussing the murders, but inconsistencies emerge when her mother does not recall the conversation.
Alice [28:38]: "It's very vague, and... let alone what they were actually saying."
- William Jones: Initially provides a confession implicating Damien and Jason Baldwin but later recants after interaction with defense investigator Ron Lacks, raising questions about the validity of his testimony.
Polygraph Tests and Interrogations
Brett discusses the controversial use of polygraph tests in the investigation, highlighting their role in both eliminating and casting suspicion on various suspects. The interrogation of Jesse Misskelley is scrutinized for its length and intensity, suggesting potential coercion tactics.
Brett [25:21]: "He quickly asked him who did it. He stated I don't know. Whoever killed them."
Role of Defense and Private Investigators
The involvement of private investigator Ron Lacks is examined, particularly his influence in encouraging witnesses to recant statements, which inadvertently weakened the prosecution's case.
Alice [48:36]: "Vicki is an interesting person that we will obviously talk more about later."
Notable Quotes with Timestamps
- Alice [04:25]: "Many tips you can just dispose of, but many of them you do have to follow up on."
- Brett [06:07]: "This investigation, whatever it is, is not organized."
- Alice [16:53]: "If the West Memphis three didn't do it and you eventually found out who did, I think that person's name would be in these files."
- Brett [12:33]: "They really are investigating all over the place, right? Not just honing in on one person."
- Alice [28:38]: "It's very vague, and... let alone what they were actually saying."
- Brett [25:21]: "He quickly asked him who did it. He stated I don't know. Whoever killed them."
Conclusion
As Episode 304 concludes, Alice and Brett reflect on the complexities and procedural missteps in the West Memphis Three investigation. They emphasize the importance of a methodical approach in criminal investigations and caution against the pitfalls of disorganized investigative strategies. The hosts also hint at forthcoming episodes that will delve deeper into overlooked aspects of the case, ensuring a comprehensive understanding for their listeners.
Brett [66:44]: "So we've been doing this podcast like six years. We've only done three. April Fools."
Final Thoughts:
This episode serves as a critical examination of the West Memphis Three case, highlighting investigative flaws, questionable witness testimonies, and the broader implications of prosecutorial practices. Alice and Brett's prosecutorial insights provide a nuanced perspective, encouraging listeners to question and analyze the intricate details of high-profile cold cases.
Join the Conversation: Engage with the hosts and other listeners through social media platforms and be part of the ongoing discussion about the West Memphis Three case and other true crime mysteries.
Support the Podcast: For early access to episodes and an ad-free experience, consider joining their Patreon. Additionally, fans can watch live recordings of upcoming episodes.
Note: This summary is based on the provided transcript and aims to encapsulate the key discussions and insights shared by Alice and Brett in Episode 304 of "The Prosecutors." For a complete understanding, listening to the full episode is recommended.