Dan Blue (7:26)
I'm only in politics for you, sir. Imagine I'm only in politics to serve you, sir, to serve Donald Trump. That's the only reason I'm running for office, the only reason I'm interested in politics at all. I am here to serve you as an individual. That is the one Republican that won his race in North Carolina state government in a statewide race this year. But because they've just got this one guy in statewide office, the auditorium Republicans just rewrote the laws of the state so that that will be the guy who's in charge of the state's elections, Even though the state auditor job has nothing to do with elections whatsoever. It's like putting the dog catcher in charge of the water department. There's just no connection at all. But he is the one Republican, and so now he'll be the elections guy. This is what they have done with the dentistry bill. They hollowed out the dentist stuff. And this is what they've done since the election. And the CoC consequence of that? Well, one of the consequences thus far is that North Carolinians have been turning up at the state legislature, filling the gallery in the legislature, shouting down the Republicans while they've been forcing through this last minute after the election hijack the dentistry bill to try to make sure they can stay in power even after they've been voted out to stay in power in the administration of state government and the judiciary, also to control future elections. Right. Because relying on the votes of the people of North Carolina is clearly not a winning strategy of them. So they're trying to work around that so they can stay in power without the people's consent. North Carolina also elects its state supreme court justices. In this election, one Democratic supreme court justice appeared to win reelection by a really slim margin. Less than 700 votes. Somewhere around 700 votes. There's a recount underway in that race right now because it was such a slim margin in that recount. Republicans are trying to throw out 60,000 ballots. They're trying to have 60,000 votes not counted in that race. 60,000. That's a lot of people to take away the vote from. Right? I mean, but they think they can do it. These are provisional ballots that they say they don't want counted. Part of the reason there's so many. There's 60,000 provisional ballots in this race is because Republicans in the legislature put in place aggressive new restrictions on voting rights in time for this election. And that resulted in a lot of North Carolina voters having to cast provisional ballots. Now Republicans are fighting to not count those ballots at all as a way to try to take that seat on the state supreme court. The people casting their votes thing just has not been working all that great for Republicans in North Carolina. So now Republicans in North Carolina are trying to make sure that votes aren't everything, that there are other ways that they can keep and expand their power. And we really don't know how this is going to work out in North Carolina. This is a live issue right now. There are Republicans from the western part of the state who voted no on this bill in part because they were furious that this is what Republicans are calling their hurricane relief bill. It's like a quarter of what the governor asked the legislature for in terms of hurricane relief dollars. It doesn't actually move money to where the hurricane hit. It doesn't actually move money to the western part of the state. So some Republicans from the hard hit western part of North Carolina are balking at this so far voting no, even though they are Republicans. The Democrats are against this. The protesters in the gallery of the legislature are very much against it, as are groups of North Carolina clergy, faith leaders, groups like the poor people's campaign, led by the reverend William Barber, the Democratic governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper. He is presumably going to veto this thing and then, you know, wait to see whether all the public pressure against it. Whether the revulsion, even among some Republicans about what they're trying to do here will be enough to allow his veto to stand, or whether Republicans might be able to override that veto in the last days of their supermajority before they are pushed out. So we shall see. This is a live issue right now. And I start with this tonight, not just because this is an important story for North Carolina, right, this audacious small d anti Democratic power grab by Republicans there. It's not just important for an important state, it's also kind of a test. It's a character test, right, to see if we've really got the stomach right now for this kind of a fight. A fight in a very practical, very blunt sense for small D democracy. Because obviously that is what's being messed with here in North Carolina. Right? If you win an election to take office as an elected official, you winning the election means you should also get the powers of that, of that job. Right? There's nothing about administering elections that should be handed to partisan act actors so that one party has a leg up in trying to win future elections. That's just not the way it's supposed to work. Trying to force those things is an anti Democratic, anti small d Democratic power grab. But that happening so bluntly and so obviously causing revulsion in so many people in North Carolina. That, of course, is also happening in the larger context of what's happening in the country. And we are seeing, with the Republican Party ascending in Washington, we are seeing a really radical effort not to just advance and advocate for and plan to implement Republican policies. We're seeing a really radical effort to change the American system of government, to consolidate power in one man's hands, to consolidate power within the executive branch of government. All this talk you've heard about firing huge swaths of the federal government, wiping out whole departments, firing career law enforcement people, firing whole categories of civil servants. All of that is about consolidating power in the executive branch so there is no source of authority or judgment within the federal government except for the one guy at the top. Except for Trump, specifically. You've heard talk about them firing the FBI director, firing the chairman of the Federal Reserve. Those are jobs that don't turn over when the presidency turns over. They're specifically designed to be independent of the political cycle so that people in those jobs at the FBI and the Fed, they do what's right for the country and not just what's right for any particular president, but this insistence, this out loud insistence from The Republicans that Chris Wray at the FBI and Jerome Powell at the Fed somehow are gonna be fired and replaced by Trump because he's coming in as the new president. That's not how the American system of government is supposed to run. That's about him consolidating his power over the executive branch, including the parts of it that are supposed to be independent from his power and control. We are also seeing, even before the Republicans take power, efforts to consolidate power over the press. Not just threatening and intimidating reporters and news organizations, but now, you know, saying they're going to use the power of the government to do it. Having their presumptive appointees say that news organizations will be reviewed by the federal government according to their editorial decisions on news issues. We're finally now getting some widespread discussion about their efforts to consolidate power also in just one man, over the legislative branch of government. So over the fourth estate, the press over the executive branch, but also over the legislative branch, over Congress. Trump demanding that the Senate not confirm his nominees, threatening to force the Senate to shut down so he can install his nominees without any confirmation hearings or votes. Votes, right. That is an effort to consolidate his power in such a way that it marginalizes and renders inert and unimportant the legislative branch of government. In that case, specifically the Senate. But it's not just the Senate. With Trump's austerity commission, this thing where they're going to cut trillions of dollars out of the budget, an effort headed by eccentric right wing billionaire Elon Musk. In order to do that, they are reportedly planning on seizing for themselves what's usually called the power of the purse, taking it away from Congress, just unilaterally cutting and reshaping the whole federal government without Congress being involved at all. So in Washington, as Trump and the Republicans are preparing to take power, Trump is working really aggressively to consolidate all government power in Trump's hands. He's looking to consolidate all the power of the executive branch in his own hands. He's looking to consolidate all power in the government over the legislative branch. Supposed to be the co equal branch of government. Not going to be co equal anymore. He's trying to liminalize it, neuter it, make it unimportant, tell them what to do and expect them to do it. He's also trying to do the same thing over the fourth estate, the so called fourth branch of government, the free press. There's also the judiciary. So far, frankly, I think he's been delighted how he's being treated by the third Branch of government, by the courts, by the judiciary. So we don't yet see him moving to defy the courts or defy court orders. But don't rest on that. I think it's very possible that that is coming. I mean, honestly, if we're, I think if you take a wide view of what's happening thus far with Trump taking power, preparing to take power in Washington, you see the efforts to consolidate power in the executive branch, to liminalize the legislative branch. I think he's ignoring the judicial branch for now. But watch for it. Obviously the efforts to intimidate the press. Right. This is all about trying to make sure that he's the only source of authority in the federal government. Honestly, in terms of what to watch for next, I think we need to be watching for something that they call autocratic breakthrough. Autocratic breakthrough is when the party in power uses the power they do have in government to make sure they can never be dislodged from government. I'll give you a concrete example. You've already seen in the House of Representatives. Now that Mike Johnson is back in as Republican House speaker, they changed the rules in the House to make it much harder to remove him as Speaker. Right. So that's them digging in, planning to stay for the long run. Now we're here, you're not gonna be able to get us out. You've seen Trump, quote, joking, end quote, about expecting to stay in office for a third term once this second term is up. And that's of course against the Constitution. But he keeps repe. Repeatedly bringing up, bringing it up, that that's his expectation. Trump advisor, his one time campaign manager, Steve Bannon, saying things in public about how they're going to be ruling for 50 years. There won't be any way to dislodge them from power. Autocratic breakthrough is when they use the powers they've achieved through winning elections to cement themselves in power so they can't be removed by future elections or by other democratic means. So we are watching the efforts to consolidate power. We are watching for signs of autocratic breakthrough, trying to entrench themselves in power so they can't be removed. This is just the way these things go. This is how strong men rule. These are the things that they are trying. That said, so far, it's not clear that their efforts are going all that great. The fact that they just want these things doesn't mean that they get them. The fact that they're trying these things doesn't mean that they'll succeed. I mean, we've already seen terrible nominees like Matt Gaetz being laughed off of Capitol Hill and having to have his nomination withdrawn. We're seeing Senate Republicans not yet caving and not yet agreeing to shut themselves down so Trump can have his nominees installed with no confirmation hearings. The press turning out to be, yes, weak kneed and lily livered, as you might fear in some quarters, but also defiant and professional and aggressive and creative in other quarters. The American Free Press thus far, for example, has been doing a great job detailing the astonishing conflicts of interest and self dealing and deep incompetence and lack of qualification, the salacious and even allegedly criminal past dealings of the freak show lineup that Trump has announced as his nominees for high office. And we'll get to some of those this hour. So his intentions for who he wants to install and for what he wants to do and how he wants to consolidate power. So the American government is essentially just the will of one man. Those are just his intentions. And it's worth being clear that those are his intentions. It's worth reporting on it, following it, being very clear eyed about the fact that that's what he's trying to do. But just because those are his intentions, it doesn't mean those things are an inescapable fate for us as a country. Politics still works. Gravity still applies, the rules of nature still work. Each of these things they're trying is likely to be a fight and a test. And it's not just in Washington. It's everywhere there is a push against democracy. Everywhere there is a push against small d democracy. We are seeing that there is a push for it too, like in North Carolina right now. Joining us now is North Carolina State Senator Dan Blue. He is the Democratic leader in the Senate of the great state of North Carolina. Senator Blue, I really appreciate you making time to be here tonight. Thank you.