Transcript
A (0:02)
If your private student loans are in default, you're not out of options. Go to yrefi.com ramsey all right, today's.
B (0:09)
Question comes from Dennis in Florida. During a recent show, you told parents that their children are not morally or ethically obligated to take care of the parents. How do you reconcile that with 1st Timothy 5, 8? Anyone who does not provide for their relatives and especially for the. For their own household and has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever? As a Christian, shouldn't we teach financial responsibility from a stewardship with love and compassion in that perspective?
A (0:39)
Okay, A question that is not a question, but that is actually a statement is called passive aggressive. But I'll answer it anyway. Okay, so you're trying to teach me the Bible. I appreciate that. The. So to start with, it says your own household and your relatives, okay? Your own household is not your parents. Your household is the children that live under your roof and your spouse. That's your household. Your parents are not your household. Okay, so who does not provide for their relatives? Now, we would never suggest that you not provide for your relatives food or some basic care as long as there is reasonable behavior involved. But the same writer as First Timothy, which is Paul, also said, those that don't work shouldn't eat. And Jesus said, if you're faithful with the little things, you'll be given more to manage. And Proverbs says the diligent prosperity. And, and, and, and, and so Scripture, when it comes to this issue, this type of issue is full of cause and effect. If you sow sparingly, you will reap sparingly. So if you plant three grains of corn, please don't expect a bumper crop. Okay? In other words, our actions have consequences. So in what condition would you need to take care of your parents? It would be if they had not done the things that the Bible teaches them to do with money, and so they have none. That would be the condition. Okay, so, for instance, there is no moral or ethical obligation for Rachel and Winston to take care of Dave and Sharon, nor will there be a mathematical need for her to take care of us. And by the way, there's not a moral athlete or there's not a mathematical need for me to take care of her and Winston either, because they've done a great job with their own life and have been responsible with the cause and effect world that the Bible outlines and that we all live in. So it is not compassion to say that carte blanche. You should always take care of your parents. That's not compassion at all now. So I disagree. That is not a compassion perspective. Love or compassion, either one. Love has mixed in it. Truth. And the truth is you should save for retirement so that your children don't have to take care of you. The truth is you should live on less than you make. The truth is you should get up and go to work. Work. These are all truthful things. Now if I've got an 80 year old lady that calls in here or a guy calls in here and his 80 year old mom zero money because they didn't do a good job with their money and dad has died and she's trying to live on Social Security and he says, I want to give her a few thousand dollars a month and I've got $2 million to make sure she's got food. I never tell him not to do that. I've never in the history of the show told him not to do that. That is an act of compassion, an act of love. And I would do that myself in that situation. But the idea that carte blanche across the board that the Bible teaches we're supposed to take, we're supposed to feed our parents in retirement regardless of how contrary and lazy and slothful and drug induced they've been, is not a biblical teaching, Dennis. So that's just not what the Bible is talking about here. So yeah, and by the way, we do teach, first thing you do with money is you take care of your household. We teach that. And if you've ever read the book I wrote, there's a bestseller called the Legacy Journey. The first thing we teach is to take care of your own household.
