The Rest Is Science – "How Big Is A Piece Of Chocolate?"
Podcast: The Rest Is Science
Hosts: Professor Hannah Fry & Michael Stevens (Vsauce)
Episode Date: February 19, 2026
Overview:
This episode embarks on a delightful journey through scientific curiosity, digging into the deceptively simple question: "How big is a piece of chocolate?" Hannah and Michael explore the science of mixtures, the finest scales of matter, chocolate chemistry, and wander off into space smells, number paradoxes, and even counterfeit coins. True to their ethos, it’s an expedition in wonder—moving from silly-sounding questions to profound insights about reality.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Does Space Have a Smell? [02:23 – 11:49]
- Listener Megan prompts a discussion about whether the vacuum of space has any odor.
- Astronaut Testimony:
- Astronauts report a "metallic, burnt steak, hot metal, gunpowder" smell after spacewalks.
- Chris Hadfield describes it as a "very metallic" scent; another astronaut likens it to "arc welding" ([03:24]).
- Why Does Space Smell?
- Theory 1: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from dying stars coat astronaut suits; same molecules found in Earth soot, exhaust, and charred food ([04:00]).
- Theory 2 (More accepted): Cosmic rays and reactive oxygen atoms create ozone when astronauts re-enter the airlock, causing the acrid, metallic odor.
- Space Smells Elsewhere:
- Spectroscopy allows us to "smell" distant nebulae by identifying molecules that produce characteristic odors.
- Sagittarius B2 in the Milky Way contains ethyl formate—the compound that smells like raspberries and rum. "The center of the Milky Way smells like a raspberry daiquiri!" ([09:10] Fry).
- Venus, by spectral analysis, contains sulfides (rotten eggs), sulfuric acid, and possibly phosphine (which is also found in penguin poop!), sparking speculation about life ([09:52]–[11:40]).
Memorable Quote:
- Hannah Fry ([09:17]): "Essentially, the center of the Milky Way smells like a raspberry daiquiri."
2. Why Is ‘Even’ Even and ‘Odd’ Odd? Wordplay and Paradox [11:49 – 16:32]
- Listener Justin asks about the origins of the words "odd" and "even" and their self-descriptive lengths.
- Etymology:
- "Odd" possibly from Old Norse, describing a pointed thing (like a triangle formed by 3 after a pair).
- "Even" is just symmetrical, divisible.
- Self-Descriptive (Autological) Words:
- "Odd" has three letters (odd), "even" has four (even).
- Words are "autological" if they describe themselves (e.g., "word" is a word, "monosyllabic" is not monosyllabic).
- The Grelling–Nelson Paradox:
- Is "heterological" (word that does not describe itself) heterological?
- Fry recognizes: This is the word version of "this statement is false" ([15:44]).
3. How Many Times Can You Fold Chewing Gum? [16:40 – 19:44]
- Listener Christian wonders if the "seven folds" rule for paper applies to gum.
- Short Answer: No hard limit; chewing gum is viscoelastic, more kneadable than foldable.
- Pastry Chef Analogy:
- Folding with layers (like croissants): 1 fold = 2 layers, 10 folds = 1,024, 24 = 16 million, 30 = thinner than a molecule.
- Chewing gum could (in theory) be folded up to about 30 times before the layers become molecularly thin.
- Unexpected culinary vision: "Could you make a chewing gum croissant?" ([18:13] Fry).
4. How Big Is the Smallest Piece of Chocolate? [19:44 – 31:42]
- Listener Ben asks: At what point does a piece of chocolate stop being chocolate and become just its components?
- Key Concepts:
- Chocolate is a mixture, not an element—no single "chocolate atom."
- Contains 300–800+ stable molecules (e.g., theobromine, various fats, acids, sugars, etc.).
- For a chunk to be recognizably “chocolate,” it needs the full range of these molecules, in proper ratios.
Calculating the Limit:
- Michael estimates the smallest "true" piece of chocolate is a zeptoliter (10⁻²¹ liters) ([27:17] Fry: "I don't even know what that is. 10 to the minus what?").
- Far too small to see or taste.
- Humans require many billions of molecules to taste anything. So, the practical threshold is about the size of a coarse grain of silt (10⁻¹³ m³), or a microgram.
- Butyric Acid (& the American Chocolate Debate):
- Hannah objects to including butyric acid—the compound associated with "off" flavors in US chocolate (and also found in rancid butter, parmesan, human vomit).
- The conversation pivots on defining “real” chocolate based on regional taste ([29:01]–[30:55]).
- Experimental Suggestion:
- Fry: "I want an experimental version where you stir in one grain of salt into some water, taste it, and then go, I know exactly what it needs—throw in a couple more...” ([30:42]).
- If you cut a Hershey bar down to a microgram, the off-flavors would vanish—but it would still be chocolate chemically.
Notable Quotes:
- Michael Stevens ([27:25]): "The smallest piece of chocolate that I believe everyone would agree, yes, that's chocolate, would be a zeptoliter."
- Hannah Fry ([29:01]): "Is butyric acid the thing that makes American chocolate bad?"
5. Tales of Counterfeit Coins and Currency Security [39:43 – 50:57]
- Michael shares his "most illegal" possession: a counterfeit US penny dated 2027 ([42:41–45:23]), which will now forever be anachronistic since the US Mint has ceased penny production.
- Fun with wordplay: "Stool sample" as a literal small model stool.
- Hannah relates Banksy’s fake £10 notes—now rare collectibles ([46:47]).
- The science of passports: Hannah describes UK security features, including transparent paper and unique UV patterns ([49:06–50:20]).
6. Childhood Books, Science, Religion, and Growing Up Curious [50:59 – 61:30]
- Michael confides he once wrote a home-made book called “Evolution the Lie” at age 10 or 11, reflecting the influence of creationist culture in 1990s Kansas ([52:22–56:05]).
- The hosts share thoughtful, personal tales about growing up in religious households, the science-religion tension, and how curiosity and open-mindedness shaped their approaches.
Notable Quotes:
- Michael Stevens ([56:05]): "This is a Vsauce script... I no longer believe evolution is clearly false... but you can see how I was synthesizing information and trying to teach."
- Hannah Fry ([57:35]): "I think... once you hit the absolute limits of our knowledge, there does come a certain leap of faith, regardless of what camp you find yourself in, whether religious or scientific or both."
- Stevens ([58:19]): "Claims about God are specifically beyond Newton’s flaming laser sword; science cannot disprove it one way or the other—and if it thinks it has, it’s not science anymore."
Notable/Memorable Moments & Quotes
-
On the Grelling–Nelson Paradox:
- Fry ([15:44]): “Oh, this is the word version of ‘this statement is false,’ isn’t it?”
- Stevens ([16:27]): “Exactly. Some Russelian exclusion saves the day.”
-
On Hershey Chocolate:
- Fry ([29:01]): "Is butyric acid the thing that makes American chocolate bad?"
- Stevens ([30:55]): "Throw in a billion atoms of butyric acid, which, by the way, is a tiny, microscopic amount, and then go, 'Tastes like childhood.'"
-
On Science vs. Religion:
- Fry ([57:35]): "...there does come a certain leap of faith, regardless of what camp you find yourself in..."
- Stevens ([58:19]): “Science cannot disprove it one way or the other—and if it thinks it has, it’s not science anymore.”
Timestamps of Important Segments
- [02:23 – 11:49] Smells in space, spectroscopy, and cosmic chemistry
- [11:49 – 16:32] Even/odd numbers, wordplay, paradoxes
- [16:40 – 19:44] Chewing gum folding and molecular logic
- [19:44 – 31:42] The smallest possible piece of chocolate (main segment)
- [39:43 – 50:57] Counterfeit coins, Banksy, and science of passports
- [50:59 – 61:30] Childhood, belief, and the relationship between science and religion
Tone and Style
Warm, playful, and encouraging of curiosity, the episode showcases the unique blend of Vsauce’s scientific enthusiasm and Hannah Fry’s witty skepticism. Listeners are welcomed as equals, and the hardest questions are treated as fuel for a shared intellectual adventure.
Summary
From cosmic aromas and the paradox of language to the fundamental nature of chocolate, this episode is a joyous romp across scientific thinking. Michael and Hannah employ humor and personal storytelling to render abstract ideas tangible—with detours into culinary science, chemistry, and the philosophy of knowledge itself. Whether pondering why chocolate can’t be atomically defined, or how cultural forces shaped their curiosity, the hosts never lose sight of the fun and mystery at the heart of science.
Endorsed summary for both chocolate lovers and science fans!
