Podcast
The Retirement and IRA Show
Hosted by Jim Saulnier, CFP® & Chris Stein, CFP® · EN
What do you get when you combine two knowledgeable CFP® PROFESSIONALS (one also a well-informed COLLEGE FINANCE INSTRUCTOR)? If you mix in relevant financial information and a healthy dose of humor you get the Retirement and IRA Radio Show! JIM SAULNIER, a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ Professional with Jim Saulnier and Associates who specializes in retirement planning for clients across the country, CHRIS STEIN, a Finance Instructor at Colorado State University who is also a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ Professional, offer real-world knowledge on a diverse range of topics including Social Security planning, investing for your retirement, the fundamentals of 401(k) and IRA accounts. Jim and Chris make learning about your retirement both educational and entertaining!
50episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Social Security, SPIA, SPIA Timing, QLAC: Q&A #2626
3d ago01:37:02Tap to summarizeJim and Chris discuss listener emails on Social Security benefits for a disabled adult child, SPIA timing and funding, longevity assumptions, and QLAC planning. (15:15) A listener asks why Social Security appears to be paying a disabled adult child benefit and child-in-care spousal benefit as a combined 50% of the worker’s PIA rather than 50% each, and how they might address the issue. (32:45) The guys discuss whether to buy a SPIA now or wait until age 70, along with the pros and cons of purchasing one with pre-tax, Roth, or brokerage assets. They also address where a DIY investor may be able to purchase a SPIA. (1:11:15) Jim and Chris respond to a listener considering whether expected AI-driven longevity advances should factor into the timing of a future SPIA purchase. (1:19:30) A listener asks about using a QLAC to help accelerate Roth conversions and whether a special needs trust for a disabled adult child could avoid a large lump-sum tax hit if both parents pass early. The post Social Security, SPIA, SPIA Timing, QLAC: Q&A #2626 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Annuity Collapse: EDU #2625
6d ago01:11:50Tap to summarizeChris’s Summary Jim and I examine an Annuity Collapse involving PHL Variable Insurance Company, a $99,000 annuity, private equity ownership, state guarantee funds, and the limits of what the article explains. We separate fixed annuities, variable annuities, general accounts, separate accounts, insurer insolvency risk, market risk, and rating history, while noting why the missing annuity details matter. Jim’s “Pithy” Summary Chris and I dig into Annuity Collapse coverage that had a lot of listeners understandably worked up, but also left out some details that matter. The headline says a woman paid $99,000 to generate retirement income for life and then the insurance company collapsed. That gets attention. It should. But before everyone runs around saying annuities are terrible and insurance companies should all be burned at the stake, we have to slow down and ask what she actually owned, because the article never clearly says whether this was fixed, variable, in payout, deferred, in the general account, or in a separate account. That distinction matters. If this was a variable annuity held in separate accounts, those assets may not be part of the insurance company’s bankruptcy estate, though market losses and access problems may still be real issues while the company is in rehabilitation or liquidation. If it was a fixed annuity or money sitting in the general account, state guarantee funds can matter, but they are not FDIC insurance, and they do not move in a few days. They can take a really long time, and the limits vary by state and product type. The larger issue is not that this woman did something wrong. I do not fault her. I fault the agent, the regulators, and the private equity games that Tom Gober has been warning about for years. PHL had weak ratings for a long time, and if it begins with a B, I think it is bad. We also talk about using AI to research insurer ratings, downgrades, ownership history, and state guarantee protections, especially before using an annuity for a lifetime income stream connected to a Minimum Dignity Floor. Link to the article: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/paid-insurance-company-99000-generate-retirement-income-life-collapsed-rcna331934 The post Annuity Collapse: EDU #2625 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Social Security, Annuities, Income, Annuities: Q&A #2625
1w ago01:42:07Tap to summarizeJim and Chris discuss listener emails on delayed Social Security credits, annuity provider ratings, DIA versus QLAC income planning, and fixed indexed annuity (FIA) recommendations. (10:30) A listener shares a long delay in receiving additional Delayed Retirement Credits on their Social Security benefit and asks whether there are any further steps to take or whether patience is the best option. (26:00) Another listener passes along Kiplinger reader survey results on annuity providers and asks whether the information may be useful in a broader discussion about choosing an insurance company. (45:00) The guys are asked when a deferred income annuity (DIA) might be better than a qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC) inside an IRA, especially given the potential RMD and tax advantages of a QLAC. (1:15:45) Jim and Chris respond to a listener nearing retirement who was advised to move TSP G Fund money into a fixed indexed annuity (FIA) and wants to understand whether that is better than keeping the funds in the TSP and using a withdrawal strategy. The post Social Security, Annuities, Income, Annuities: Q&A #2625 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Forced Annuitization: EDU #2624
2w ago01:06:18Tap to summarizeChris’s Summary Jim and I continue our discussion on Forced Annuitization in a highly appreciated non-qualified variable annuity owned by a 90-year-old listener’s mother. We examine LIFO taxation, IRD, IRMAA, period certain annuitization, beneficiary options, IOVAs, and the difference between a codified annuitization approach and the less certain non-qualified stretch. The distinction between a noun annuity and a verb annuity does a lot of work here. Jim’s “Pithy” Summary Chris and I pick back up with a listener’s situation involving Forced Annuitization, a 90-year-old mother, and a non-qualified variable annuity with a tremendous amount of gain. This is not the insurance company being nefarious. These contracts have annuitization dates, and in an older contract, age 95 may once have seemed far away. Now it is an iceberg. The first question is still simple: what does mom want to do? From there, the insurance company’s actual annuitization options matter, preferably in writing, because every policy is unique. We get into the black-and-white choices and the gray area. A life with period certain option may spread payments beyond the forced annuitization point if the insurer allows it. If death occurs before annuitization, a non-spouse beneficiary generally faces two cleaner choices: annuitize within one year based on actuarially sound life expectancy, or use the five-year rule. Then we look at investment-only variable annuities, where the insurance company may provide the annuity wrapper, the assets remain in separate accounts, and one company Jim contacted allows new contracts up to age 95 with forced annuitization pushed out to age 121. The gray area is the non-qualified stretch. Jim explains why he has softened, but not flipped, on it. The SECURE Act changed Section 401, not Section 72(s), and that matters. Still, the comfort level depends on PLRs, insurance company practice, and how much uncertainty someone is willing to tolerate. One path is the verb annuity: give up access and control in exchange for a lifetime stream of income. The other keeps the noun annuity alive, with more flexibility, but less certainty. Same problem, very different wrappers. The post Forced Annuitization: EDU #2624 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Social Security, Annuities for LTC Planning: Q&A #2624
2w ago01:15:54Tap to summarizeJim and Chris discuss listener emails on Social Security earnings limits, and two emails relating to using annuities for LTC planning. (13:00) — A listener asks whether income from selling NSO stock counts as earned income for Social Security, potentially triggering the earnings limit before full retirement age. (21:00) — George asks about using a 1035 exchange to move variable annuities with guaranteed living benefits into a product offering long-term care benefits, and wants help weighing the tradeoffs of this approach. (49:45) — The guys help a listener think through annuity planning to fund future long-term care costs for in-laws, including whether to use one joint annuity or two individual annuities and where to find SPIA quotes. The post Social Security, Annuities for LTC Planning: Q&A #2624 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Understanding Forced Annuitization: EDU #2623
3w ago01:09:14Tap to summarizeChris’s Summary: Jim and I continue our discussion on annuity basics before turning to a listener’s email centered on forced annuitization, a maturity date built into every annuity contract requiring annuitization or full distribution by a set age. A listener’s mother faces this deadline at 95 with a variable annuity that grew over 10x, creating a substantial IRD (Income in Respect of a Decedent) tax burden. We consider options including period-certain annuitization, adding a younger co-annuitant, a 1035 exchange, and charitable strategies. Jim’s “Pithy” Summary: Chris and I are picking back up where we left off last week on the basics of annuities, and we take a hard look at the licensing mess on both sides of the industry: insurance agents selling products tied to indexes they’re not licensed to discuss, and investment advisors selling annuities through wholesalers without ever getting an insurance license. We also get into why AI is becoming the great equalizer for consumers, and how a 2005 class action lawsuit built on a complete misunderstanding of annuity maturity dates sets up the real conversation. That real conversation is a listener’s email about forced annuitization. His mother bought a variable annuity in 2002 with money she didn’t need to cover her Minimum Dignity Floor and invested it aggressively. Set it and forget it. Now, decades later, a deadline is closing in, and what looked like a smart, tax-deferred decision has turned into a significant IRD problem with no clean exit. The listener has been chipping away at it, but the math isn’t cooperating. There are options, some involving the existing contract, some involving moving it entirely, and at least one that surprised even me when I dug back through my notes. None of them are perfect, but the worst move may be the one he’s already making. We’ll get into all of it. The post Understanding Forced Annuitization: EDU #2623 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Social Security, Rule of 55, QLAC Timing, SPIAs: Q&A #2623
3w ago01:25:47Tap to summarizeJim and Chris discuss listener emails on whether Social Security should be compared to an annuity, Rule of 55 distribution rules, using period-certain annuities during the delay period, QLAC timing and taxes, and using a SPIA for Minimum Dignity Floor coverage. (5:20) The guys address a listener’s objection to describing Social Security as an annuity and whether that comparison is accurate. (32:00) A listener seeks clarification on Rule of 55 distributions after receiving conflicting information about whether plan-specific rules matter. (38:45) Georgette asks whether a 10-year period before her mortgage is paid off can be treated like a delay period and covered with a period-certain annuity. (51:30) Jim and Chris answer a question about whether QLACs can be purchased for a spouse from an IRA, how QLAC timing can be structured, and how payments are taxed. (1:13:45) George wonders whether relying on excess RMDs or purchasing a qualified second-and-survivor SPIA from IRA funds is a better way to support long-term MDF coverage. The post Social Security, Rule of 55, QLAC Timing, SPIAs: Q&A #2623 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Annuity Basics: EDU #2622
4w ago01:38:53Tap to summarizeChris’s Summary Jim and I tackle annuity basics to start off another National Annuity Awareness Month. We cover what annuities are as insurance contracts, the four parties to a contract, the accumulation and distribution phases, and the key differences among the major annuity types. We also touch on tax deferral rules, LIFO treatment, and the historical and industry context behind why annuities remain so widely misunderstood. Jim’s “Pithy” Summary Chris and I use National Annuity Awareness Month to get back to annuity basics. I have a book in my office, Lee Welling Squier’s Old Age Dependency in the United States, written in 1912, before Social Security existed, that begins by asking why people don’t use annuities to help provide against want in old age. That question stuck with me because I was taught early in this industry that annuities were horrible, while pensions were wonderful. But, if a pension was one leg of the old three-legged stool, and the 401(k) helped pull that leg out, then maybe we ought to at least understand the product that can mimic some of that pension-like income for retirees who need it. Not love it. Not hate it. Just understand it. So, we start with the basics: what you are buying, who is making the promise, who controls the contract, whose life the payment is based on, how the accumulation phase works, and when/if the thing you own turns into a stream of income all matter. The word “annuity” covers a lot of very different vehicles. Some are plain and straightforward. Some are complex, with riders, caps, participation rates, and spreads. Some may be useful in the right circumstances. Others may be costly, confusing, or misapplied. And if you do not understand which type of annuity you are looking at, it is easy to use the wrong one in the wrong place. The post Annuity Basics: EDU #2622 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Social Security, Annuity RMDs, Annuity Laddering: Q&A #2622
May 3001:17:10Tap to summarizeJim and Chris discuss listener emails on Social Security survivor and ex-spouse benefits, using annuity income to satisfy RMDs, and annuity laddering strategies for both SPIAs and DIAs and MYGAs. (6:30) George writes in about a cousin who turns 62 in November 2026 and whose ex-spouse recently passed away — he wants to know what survivor and ex-spouse Social Security claiming options may be available. (19:45) A listener asks whether annuity income payments from a qualified annuity can be used to satisfy the RMD requirement on a separate IRA, potentially eliminating the need to take distributions from the IRA altogether. 43:15) The guys hear from a long-term buy-and-hold investor at the start of his transition from accumulation to decumulation who is drawn to the idea of purchasing SPIAs or DIAs in multiple chunks rather than a single lump sum and is curious about tradeoffs as well as how to apply a dollar-cost averaging mindset to annuity income. (1:01:00) Jim and Chris take a question from a listener about 2.5 years from retirement who is considering laddering MYGAs through his 401(k) and wants to know whether the yield advantage of A-rated carriers is worth the added risk compared to sticking with A+ or higher, and whether CD laddering might be a simpler alternative. The post Social Security, Annuity RMDs, Annuity Laddering: Q&A #2622 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →Income Annuities in Retirement: EDU #2621
May 2701:30:16Tap to summarizeChris’s Summary Jim and I discuss income annuities in retirement as a lead-in to National Annuity Awareness Month, using a Fidelity Viewpoints article to frame the discussion. We walk through the article’s points on essential expenses, paycheck-like income, and management simplicity later in retirement. We also distinguish traditional income annuities from more complex annuity products and address liquidity, inflation protection, insurance company risk, and death-benefit trade-offs. Jim’s “Pithy” Summary Chris and I use a Fidelity Viewpoints article on income annuities in retirement to get an early start on National Annuity Awareness Month. The article points out that an income annuity may help when Social Security and pensions do not fully cover essential expenses, may provide some peace of mind around income that lasts for life, and may make retirement easier to manage later on. Those are not new ideas around here! Those essential expenses the article discusses is what we refer to as the Minimum Dignity Floor: food, utilities, transportation, housing, and healthcare. If Social Security and pensions do not fully cover those expenses, a simple income annuity may be worth understanding because if the basics are projected to outlast the income already in place, the question deserves more than a knee-jerk yes or no. We also spend time on what happens when the paycheck stops. People can have plenty of money and still miss the safety of income showing up on schedule. That is where the bottomless cup of coffee idea comes back in, and why spending during the Go-Go years can feel different when the basics are covered. Chris also gets into the simplicity point: aging, confidence, fraud risk, and why the older you, or a surviving spouse, may not want every decision tied to a portfolio. We also get into the article’s trade-offs, including loss of liquidity, lack of inflation protection, insurance company credit risk, and what happens if someone dies earlier than expected. Show Notes: Fidelity Article – “How to feel financially secure in retirement” The post Income Annuities in Retirement: EDU #2621 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.
Transcribe →