← The Rubin Report
The Rubin Report
Shooting Near White House, Cole Allen Judge Sparks Outrage, Texas Backlash | 5/5/26 FIRST LOOK
00:07:37
Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:04]
A
Hey everybody, I'm Dave Rubin and this is First Look. It's Tuesday, May 5, 2026. We've got a packed show for you today. Secret Service shoots an armed suspect just steps from the White House. Days after a separate assassination attempt. A federal judge apologizes to the White House Correspondent's Dinner gunman Cole Allen and bizarrely compares him to January 6th defendants. A taxpayer funded Texas water park sparks outrage over a Muslim only event. Let's dive in. We start with breaking security concerns right outside the White House. On Monday, Secret Service agents engaged in a shootout with an armed suspect just a few blocks south of the White House near the National Mall and the Washington Monument. According to Secret Service Deputy Director Matthew Quinn, plainclothes agents were patrolling the outer perimeter with when they spotted what he called the visual print of a firearm on a suspicious individual. That's when things escalated fast. Agents called in uniformed officers to assist. When they approached the suspect, he briefly fled on foot, then pulled out a firearm and opened fire on law enforcement. Secret Service returned fire and struck the suspect who was taken to a local hospital. And here's the disturbing part. This wasn't contained to just the suspect. Authorities say a juvenile bystander was also hit, suffering non life threatening injuries and is now being treated. Now, timing here is critical. Just moments before the incident, Vice President J.B. vance's motorcade had passed through that exact area. The White House immediately went into lockdown. Reporters were rushed into the briefing room and video showed journalists scrambling off the North Lawn. Dozens of Secret Service and National Guard members flooded the scene. Streets were roped off with police tape. And here's something else that stands out. Inside the White House, President Trump was hosting a business event with small business owners. And it continued as scheduled. No panic, no disruption, just business as usual. Now this comes at a very concerning moment because just over a week ago there was a separate incident involving an assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents dinner. So when you look at these incidents together, there's a pattern. Put these two incidents together and the pattern is obvious. Threats are escalating, actors are getting bolder, and security around the White House is being tested in ways we haven't seen in years. Now to a story that's raising serious eyebrows across the country, A federal judge has apologized to the would be Trump assassin Cole Allen. During a court hearing Monday, Magistrate Judge Zia Faruki criticized how Allen has been treated in custody and even said, at a minimum, I should be apologizing to him. Yes, apologizing to a man accused of trying to Assassinate the the President of the United States. Allen had been placed under suicide watch, which meant 24 hour lockdown in a safe cell, no phone access, no visitors outside his legal team, extremely restricted conditions. Prosecutors argued this made sense because Allen himself reportedly said he didn't expect to survive the attack, suggesting he could be a danger to himself. But the judge didn't buy it. Instead, he said he was disturbed by the conditions and then made a comparison that's turning heads. He brought up January 6th defendants, saying, I never heard of one January 6th defendant who was put in five point restraints or in a safe cell. He even referenced gallows outside the Capitol, suggesting those defendants were treated less harshly than Allen. Then he went further. Allen was reportedly denied access to a Bible, denied a tablet to assist in his defense, and the judge openly mocked the system for that, saying, if we can get someone vegan food, we can get you a Bible. He ordered the jail to fix the situation immediately and move Allen to less restrictive housing with windows. Now, let's be very clear. This is a man accused of attempting to assassinate the President, firing at Secret Service, entering a high security federal event with a weapon. And yet the focus in that courtroom shifted to his comfort, his accommodations, and whether he's being treated too harshly. That's where we are. And finally, a story out of Texas that's igniting a major debate about public spaces and discrimination. A taxpayer funded water park in Grand Prairie, Texas, Epic Waters, is facing backlash after hosting an event that was initially advertised as Muslims only. The event, called DFW Epic Eid, is scheduled for June 1 and the original flyer made it very clear attendance was restricted to Muslims. Modest dress was required and the entire park would be exclusively reserved. This is an 80,000 square foot indoor water park built in 2017 at a cost of $88 million, funded in part by by a local sales tax approved by voters. So naturally people had questions. Critics immediately pushed back. Seems like a civil rights violation. Should we expect a Christians only day? Radio host Dana Lausch asked, how is a taxpayer funded entity allowed to discriminate now? After the backlash, organizers started walking it back. A new flyer removed the phrase Muslim only and replaced it with modest dress only. All are welcome. The organizer, Aminah Knight said the intention was not to exclude, but to create a space centered around Eid celebrations and modest attire. Still, the event includes a strict modest dress code. Suggestions like burkinis for women, swim trunks with shirts for men, a private prayer room during the event, halal food offerings, tickets priced at $55 to $65 and importantly, the FAQ originally stated the park was exclusively reserved for Muslims. The water park itself says it's not hosting the event directly. It simply rents the space to outside groups. And those groups control programming. But here's the bigger issue. When a publicly funded facility is being used in a way that appears to exclude people based on rel, even temporarily, it raises serious legal and cultural questions. And clearly, a lot of Americans are asking, would this be acceptable if the roles were reversed? And that's your first look this Tuesday. Quick recap. A shootout near the White House raises new concerns about security threats. A judge apologizes to the would be Trump assassin sparking outrage. And a Texas water park faces backlash over a controversial religious event. We'll keep following all of it. I'm Dave Rubin. Thanks for starting your day with first look. See you tomorrow.