The Sonia Elijah Podcast

Interview with Michael from Cafe Locked Out: Exposing the COVID Lies and the Rise of Digital Authoritarianism

I recently joined Michael on his show for a wide-ranging conversation about my book, 3/11 Viral Takeover. Key Points from the discussion:* The engineered narrative from day one: How top scientists (including Fauci, Farrar, and others) privately discussed lab-origin possibilities while publicly condemning it as a “conspiracy theory” in the Lancet and elsewhere. Conflicts of interest were hidden.* The flawed foundation for lockdowns: Neil Ferguson’s Imperial College model, its catastrophic (and wrong) predictions, and how one paper shut down the world despite early contrary data from Nobel laureate Michael Levitt and the Diamond Princess cruise ship.* Suppression of early treatments: The coordinated attack on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin — including the retracted Surgisphere scandal in The Lancet, to clear the path for emergency authorisation of the novel mRNA products.* Censorship machinery: The Trusted News Initiative, Event 201, government pressure on Big Tech, the CCDH (“Disinformation Dozen”), and the weaponisation of “misinformation” labels against scientists, doctors, and the vaccine-injured.* The bigger picture: Vaccine passports as a proof-of-concept for digital IDs, the shift to permanent biosecurity states, and the alarming rise of digital authoritarianism across the West — including arrests for social media posts and expanding surveillance.We also spoke about the human cost: the psychological operation that used fear and compliance, the silencing of the vaccine-injured, excess deaths, and why hard-copy documentation of these events matters more than ever.If you haven’t yet, grab a copy and share it. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Going LIVE with Dr Drew

Apr 2100:25:07Tap to summarize

It was great going LIVE with Dr Drew discussing the explosive testimony from former Pfizer Europe head of toxicology Dr. Helmut Sterz, who estimates 20,000–60,000 COVID shot-related deaths in Germany alone.We covered systematic data destruction, lost serious adverse events (including child deaths with no pre-existing conditions), lack of autopsies, blanket liability granted before the pandemic declaration, regulatory capture, and the weaponization of fear.All of this and much more, is meticulously documented in my book 3/11 Viral Takeover.If you appreciate the work I do as an investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

My Recent Interview on RCR with Paul Brennan – Exposing the Machinery Behind the COVID Response and What's Coming Next

Apr 1500:26:26Tap to summarize

Last week I had the pleasure of sitting down again with Paul Brennan on RCR (Reality Check Radio) in New Zealand to discuss my new book, 3/11 Viral Takeover: On March 11, 2020, a Pandemic Was Declared and Our World Changed Forever.We covered the forensic timeline I spent months compiling: the pre-planned exercises like Crimson Contagion and Event 201, the rapid alignment of Moderna’s vaccine sequence just days after the viral genome was published, the invocation of emergency powers weeks before the WHO even declared a pandemic, and the coordinated machinery of fear, censorship, and compliance that followed.Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.The conversation unpacked how unelected scientific advisors (SAGE in the UK and equivalents elsewhere), international organisations, and the emerging biodefence-industrial complex effectively took control. We discussed the weaponisation of behavioural science and flawed modelling to push lockdowns, the suppression of early treatments, the known risks with mRNA technology that were ignored, and the censorship apparatus, including the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative, that silenced dissenting scientists, doctors, and even vaccine-injured individuals.We also looked ahead at the UK’s new £1 billion pandemic preparedness strategy, with its proposed “All Pandemics Hazards Bill,” expanded contract tracing, biosecurity hub, and sweeping emergency powers. Officials are already framing the next crisis as a “certainty.” As I explain in the interview, 3/11 wasn’t just a health event, it was a biological sequel to 9/11 in its scale of disruption and the permanent changes it accelerated: mass compliance, surveillance, narrative control, and the shift toward digital authoritarianism. The book is evidence-based, with 900+ citations, FOIA documents, leaked emails, scientific literature, and whistleblower interviews. Paul asked me if I’m afraid of what’s coming. My answer: No. Because knowledge is the antidote. The more people understand how the machinery worked last time, the harder it becomes to run the same playbook again.You can also listen to the full interview here.3/11 Viral Takeover is now available in Kindle, paperback, and hardcover editions.Order on Amazon.com/ Amazon.co.uk (or search “3.11 Viral Takeover Sonia Elijah” in your local Amazon store).If you’ve already read it (or once you do), I’d be incredibly grateful if you could leave an honest review on Amazon. Reviews make a huge difference in helping independent investigative work reach more people, especially on a topic this important.If you appreciate the work I do as an investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Exclusive Interview: DNA Contamination in COVID Shots Amidst Retraction Wars and Cyber Censorship

Jan 1301:41:06Tap to summarize

In a world where questioning the safety of the COVID-19 shots can lead to professional ruin, cyber sabotage, and relentless smear campaigns, a group of courageous scientists continues to shine a light on alarming findings that regulators and pharmaceutical giants would prefer to remain hidden.At the end of last year, I had the privilege of speaking with Kevin McKernan, Jessica Rose, and David Speicher. Their pioneering research on uncovering shocking levels of DNA contamination in the Pfizer and Moderna shots has not only challenged the safety narrative but also ignited a firestorm of backlash, including retraction attempts.In a chilling escalation, recently the Daily Mail covered another bombshell scandal: a major oncology journal, Oncotarget, falls victim to a cyber attack mere days after publishing a damning systematic review linking COVID shots to cancer cases worldwide.Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Below is a summary of the interview’s key revelations, where the parallels become stark: a coordinated effort to silence inconvenient truths about these experimental shots. The Discovery: DNA Fragments in the Pfizer and Moderna Vaccine VialsThe interview begins with the origins of their research. Kevin McKernan, a genomics expert, first identified DNA contamination in vaccine vials back in April 2023. This led to a preprint paper in October 2023, which faced criticism for using anonymous samples.Kevin McKernan: “We got some anonymous vials and did some initial work on those. The number one critique was that you don’t know the source, someone could have contaminated them. So we got in touch with David [Speicher] and Maria [Gutschi], who had vials from Canada that were all cold-chained and tracked.”To address concerns, the team expanded their study, testing more vials and using advanced methods. Their findings showed DNA levels far exceeding regulatory limits: up to 600 times higher in some cases, particularly in Moderna vials.The paper, titled “Quantification of Residual Plasmid DNA in SV40 Promoter Enhancer Sequences in Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Mod RNA COVID-19 Vaccines from Ontario, Canada,” was published in the peer-reviewed journal Autoimmunity on September 6, 2025.Measuring DNA: qPCR vs. Fluorometry ExplainedA key point of contention is how DNA is measured. Regulators often use qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction), which targets specific DNA sequences, while the team used fluorometry for a broader view.Sonia Elijah: “What is qPCR versus fluorometry? Regulators say there’s no issue because it’s under the 10 nanograms per dose limit.”Kevin McKernan: “Fluorometry binds any double-stranded DNA. It will detect all sequences, including E. coli DNA. qPCR only targets specific pieces, like the kanamycin resistance gene, then extrapolates based on plasmid size but it misses E. coli DNA. David’s work showed varying levels across the plasmid: kanamycin or origin regions give one number, spike DNA is 100 times higher! You can’t assume uniform distribution. Regulators use qPCR on the kanamycin gene, which is lower than spike DNA, even though they have a spike assay.”Fluorometry revealed higher contamination, even after treating samples with RNase to remove RNA interference. Critics argued about “crosstalk” (where dyes might detect RNA as DNA), but the team addressed this by validating their methods.David Speicher: “Fluorometry is used to measure the RNA dose in the vaccines, so why frown upon it for DNA? We showed the dyes have low crosstalk, but we still used RNase to confirm.” The SV40 promoter sequence, known for nuclear targeting and potential cancer risks, was a major concern. The team emphasized that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) protect DNA, making the old 10 ng limit outdated.The Retraction Saga: PubPeer (PubSmear), Retraction Watch, and Conflicts of InterestJust 11 days after publication, the paper came under investigation due to comments on PubPeer (dubbed “PubSmear” by the group) and complaints from reviewer Rolf Marschalek. The team uncovered a network involving PubPeer, Retraction Watch, and individuals with ties to vaccine funding. Retraction Watch leaked a review PDF, revealing Marschalek as the author, despite his conflict of interest, as their paper critiqued his work (Kaiser et al., Vaccine 2025, 55:127022).Jessica Rose: “We got an email saying the paper was under investigation because of a PubPeer commenter. Ironically, the comment was fabricated, a made-up quote from a referenced paper by Klinman et al. The probe was prompted by that and Rolf Marschalek. It’s ongoing; on the 22nd, they added an ‘under investigation’ note. On November 20, Retraction Watch emailed us, accidentally revealing they’d received a review (against COPE guidelines) and attached another PDF. Metadata showed [Rolf] Marschalek as author. It’s a scandal! A network paying $5,000 for retractions, targeting narrative-challenging papers. We have timelines and receipts showing guideline violations.”Kevin McKernan: “Marschalek works at DFG in Germany, which invested 30 million euros in BioNTech and 300 million in COVAX. He shouldn’t have reviewed us. He claimed he rejected the paper, but the editor said he only suggested modifications.”Funding links were exposed: PubPeer and Retraction Watch share backing from the Arnold Foundation (Enron ties). Kevin McKernan: “They’re in cahoots. Retraction Watch points to PubPeer’s anonymous complaints, allowing sock-puppet attacks, and some critics boast about payments for retractions.”David Speicher: “All this is U.S. tax-deductible. It’s a cartel. PubPeer rips papers apart anonymously, Retraction Watch publicizes it.”The team responded with a 22-page rebuttal, but the process remains opaque. They suspect ideological bias, as similar scrutiny is not applied to pro-vaccine studies.A Pattern of Suppression: From Retractions to Cyber SabotageThe scientists discussed systemic issues, including how peer review originated from intelligence-linked figures like Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell’s father).Kevin McKernan: “Peer review was a mechanism for influence capture. It’s a $40 billion market with better margins than Google, but it’s captured by pharma ads.”They criticized regulators like Australia’s TGA for using flawed qPCR assays and ignoring spike DNA. Recent findings show methylated DNA and RNA-DNA hybrids, explaining high contamination.Jessica Rose: “Every rock turned over reveals another issue. Attacks make our work better: they motivate us.”The group proposes a decentralized alternative: peer-to-peer review on blockchain platforms like Nostr or Bitcoin, where reviewers are paid directly, bypassing gatekeepers.Kevin McKernan: “Put papers on immutable ledgers. Pay reviewers the $3,000 journal fee instead. It creates competition and quality.”They hope the new U.S. administration, including RFK Jr. and Sen. Ron Johnson, will investigate via RICO laws for racketeering.The team is divided on retraction odds but united in resolve. Two follow-up papers are in progress, reinforcing their findings.David Speicher: “It’s on the U.S. Congressional record. Retracting it now would expose bias.”Jessica Rose: “If it gets retracted, it’ll raise a stink. We’re real scientists. We’ll keep publishing.”Kevin McKernan: “Reproduction is key. Attacks breed distrust, but our data stands.”As if to underscore the depths of this corruption, consider the recent cyberattack on the journal Oncotarget, which published a peer-reviewed paper by eminent Browns University cancer researcher Dr. Wafik El-Deiry and Tufts University cancer researcher Charlotte Kuperwasser. Their study, released in early January 2026, reviewed global evidence from 2020–2025 linking COVID-19 vaccinations and infections to cancer signals, including 333 cases across 27 countries, where cancers were newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened shortly after vaccination. Titled “Evaluation of Cancer Reports Following COVID-19 Vaccination and Infection,” the paper challenged the narrative around vaccine safety by highlighting potential oncogenic (cancer-causing) risks, such as “turbo cancers.”Mere days after publication, Oncotarget was hit by a sophisticated cyberattack that took the entire site offline, effectively censoring the paper. The journal reported the incident to the FBI, describing it as a “malicious cyberattack.” The attacks disrupted online publications and website access, with the journal alleging possible involvement from individuals linked to PubPeer (the so-called “PubSmear” network) in hacking, offline disruptions, and search result manipulation.Dr. Wafik El-Deiry took to X to condemn the incident:“Freedom of the Press is protected under the First Amendment of the US Constit...

Transcribe →

"Disinformation Dozen" Survivor—Sayer Ji Speaks Out

Nov 2500:47:42Tap to summarize

In this explosive 47-minute interview, GreenMedInfo founder Sayer Ji reveals what it was really like to be publicly branded as one of the world’s leading “anti-vaxxers,” and being named on the “Disinformation Dozen’s” list, back in 2021.The CCDH report that made him infamous claimed that 13 (actually mislabelled as the “Disinformation Dozen”) individuals produced 65% of all anti-vaccine content. Meta’s own audit later found the true number was 0.05% – a 1,300-fold lie. President Biden accused them of “killing people,” the Surgeon General called them dangerous, and the Department of Homeland Security classified vaccine-safety dissent as potential domestic terrorism. Ji’s journey began decades earlier. A chronically ill child saved by natural medicine, he spent years managing health-food stores in Florida and collating peer-reviewed research showing natural compounds often outperform drugs. In 2008 he launched GreenMedInfo.com, which now hosts ~100,000 studies on 10,000+ topics. As early as 2013, UNICEF and U.S. military IPs were monitoring the site; by 2020 the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative had ranked GreenMedInfo among “far-right extremist” outlets exploiting COVID.In mid-2021, within months of the CCDH report, Ji and most of the listed individuals were simultaneously deplatformed from every major social network (Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, even Linktree) despite audiences totalling millions. He describes this as the moment the open, organic Web 2.0 era ended and algorithmic narrative control was fully weaponized. Behind the censorship, Ji says, was transatlantic coordination:* August 2021: the UK Foreign Office gave a censorship “masterclass” inside the Biden White House–revealed in documents obtained by American First Legal in its litigation against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).* NATO’s 2019 “tanks and tweets” doctrine officially equated dissenting speech with physical warfare.* 2024 leaked CCDH documents revealed the organisation ran literal “black ops” against RFK Jr. during the U.S. election.On a personal level, Ji and his then-wife (holistic psychiatrist Dr. Kelly Brogan, also on the list) were targeted by Charles Kriel’s 2022 “Dis/Informed” documentary. Kriel, who has deep ties to NATO’s Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (StratCom COE), used photos of their child and portrayed maskless breathing as a terrorist threat. He describes death threats, reputational warfare, and pressure on loved ones so severe he still cannot fully disclose it.“The more coherent and loving you remain, the less it works… Non-violent non-compliance and speaking truthfully is how we win.”He sees the ultimate stakes as bodily and cognitive sovereignty. The multi-trillion-dollar biomedical–military–media complex cannot tolerate the message that the human body can largely heal itself. Vaccine passports, digital IDs, the UK Online Safety Act, EU Digital Services Act, and the breaking of end-to-end encryption are all steps toward a biosecurity control grid where medical compliance enforces total surveillance.“We are in another 1776 moment… Humanity can still choose regeneration over control.”Yet, Ji ends on a hopeful note: the United States remains the biggest obstacle to this new world order because of its founding principles. The 2024 election was a second 1776 moment. With transparency and accountability (starting with figures like CCDH’s Imran Ahmed, whom he accuses of acting as an unregistered foreign agent), a healthy, post-imperial US–UK relationship is still possible, and humanity can choose regeneration over control.You can read all of Sayer’s highly informative articles on his Substack Sayer Ji If you appreciate the hard work I do as an independent investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

Excess Deaths and Hidden Data: Dr Clare Craig on Her Landmark Case Against the UKHSA

Nov 2000:34:25Tap to summarize

In a ruling that has ignited fierce criticism, a UK tribunal last month sided with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and refused to order the release of fully anonymised record-level data linking COVID-19 vaccination dates to dates of death. Dr Clare Craig, a medical doctor, diagnostic pathologist and co-chair of the HART Group (Health Advisory & Recovery Team), has spent nearly three years attempting to obtain the data through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. In an exclusive interview, she laid bare the extraordinary lengths to which government bodies went to prevent public scrutiny. What data was requested? Dr Craig asked for nothing that could identify any individual:* Only adults aged 20 and over* 10-year age bands (the same used in official publications)* Vaccination dates and death dates randomly shifted by a few days (a standard anonymisation technique)* No names, no exact dates of birth, no postcodes, no causes of death“This is about a population-level problem,” Dr Craig emphasised. “There is literally no way any individual could be identified from this dataset.”Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.The shifting excusesThe UKHSA initially refused on the grounds that randomising dates constituted “creating new data” – an argument demolished by existing case law. When that failed, the agency pivoted repeatedly:* First: privacy concerns and risk of “jigsaw identification”* Then: public safety – claiming release could cause “mental distress” to bereaved families or incite violence against doctors and scientists* Finally: the surreal assertion that checking the data for re-identification risks would take one person 76 years to complete (a figure eerily identical to the FDA’s excuse for delaying Pfizer trial documents)The tribunal ultimately accepted the “health and safety” argument – that the spreadsheet, if released, could somehow be misused by “anti-vaxxers” to harass relatives or fuel threats – despite no evidence being presented that this has ever happened anywhere in the world where similar data is public.Secret hearings and cherry-picked evidenceSome parts of the case were heard in closed sessions from which Dr Craig was excluded. She were given only “gists” of the secret evidence presented to the judge. Most controversially, a witness statement from eminent psychotherapist Dr Christian Buckland – arguing that truth and transparency are psychologically protective and that openness prevents, rather than causes, distress – was ruled inadmissible and excluded from the official bundle. Astonishingly, the judge later quoted from the excluded statement in his written decision, selectively stitching together phrases to suggest the exact opposite of Dr Buckland’s professional opinion.International comparisons expose the absurdityWhile British authorities claim the data is too “dangerous” to release, other countries have published far more detailed record-level information without incident:* The Czech Republic has had fully public, highly granular vaccination–death data available for years. Independent analyses have been conducted; no harassment, no violence, no mental-health crisis among the bereaved has ensued.* A brand-new Royal Society Open Science paper (November 2025) on German regional data – where vaccination rates varied dramatically – clearly demonstrates higher all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated areas after 2021, using districts as their own historical controls.Excess deaths and the disappearing statisticsDr Craig highlighted the suspicious timing:* In 2023 the Office for National Statistics (ONS) abruptly stopped publishing deaths by vaccination status – data that had started to show concerning trends.* At almost exactly the same moment, the ONS introduced a new, highly complex excess-death baseline model that double-counts upward trends in age and region, artificially inflating “expected” deaths. The result: weeks that would previously have been flagged as clear excess now appear normal or even below expectation.* Identical baseline hikes occurred simultaneously in Australia, the Netherlands, and elsewhere.“By 2022 the virus was behaving like a common cold, lockdowns were over, and we should have seen a mortality deficit as the frail had sadly already passed away in 2020–21,” Dr Craig explained. “Instead we saw persistent excess deaths – highest in the most heavily vaccinated countries and regions.”A dam of public suspicionThe Telegraph’s coverage of the tribunal ruling attracted more than 1,500 reader comments – almost unanimously expressing alarm and demanding transparency. The handful defending the official line were drowned out. Dr Craig believes the case may ultimately achieve more through publicity than the data itself would have done:“I wanted the spreadsheet, but the fact that the government fought this hard, using secret courts and ever-more outlandish excuses, tells its own story. Lack of transparency breeds suspicion. They have made a massive strategic error.”She remains resolute: “The conversation has to be had now. People are no longer paralysed by fear. They are ready to listen.”Whether the UK government can continue to suppress basic mortality data in the face of mounting public anger remains to be seen. For now, the door has been slammed shut – but the noise on the other side is growing louder.If you appreciate the hard work I do as an independent investigative journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription or buy me a coffee! Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

🚨"763 COVID Shot Safety Signals were LOST!"

Oct 301:34:54Tap to summarize

Independent researchers, Dr. David Wiseman PhD, MRPharmS and Maria Gutschi BScPhm, PharmD, highlight the profound flaws in the safety monitoring and regulatory oversight of the COVID shots. They discuss their research, detailed in two preprints on ResearchGate:* ‘Signal loss by truancy, masking, and filtering, and underestimation of potential risks and suspected adverse reactions in the Disproportionality Signal Analyses of VAERS data associated with COVID-19 pro-vaccines’ (September 2025) Author: Dr. David Wiseman* ‘Great expectations and generous reading of guidelines underestimate potential risk in oversight of COVID- 19 pro-vaccine quality, safety testing, and manufacturing: 248 questions for FDA’ (September 2025)Authors: Dr David Wiseman and Maria Gutschi The 763 Lost Safety Signals in VAERS AnalysisDavid’s initial preprint analyzes the FDA’s empirical Bayesian disproportionality signal detection in VAERS data for the COVID modRNA shots, which he refers to as “pro-vaccines” due to their gene-therapy-like mechanism. He identifies three methodological flaws—truancy, masking, and filtering—that systematically underestimated risks, leading to the loss of hundreds of potential safety signals.* Truancy: This refers to signals that “went missing” without explanation. By cross-referencing the FDA’s data with more comprehensive datasets, David estimates 281 unreported signals. For instance, myocarditis signals for Moderna and pulmonary embolism for both Moderna and Pfizer vanished from the FDA’s reports, despite statistical plausibility.* Masking: Adverse events from one vaccine (e.g., Pfizer’s myocarditis cases) were erroneously lumped into the control group for another (e.g., Moderna), obscuring true signals. The FDA used Oracle’s Empirica software but skipped its masking-adjustment feature, potentially hiding another 365 signals.* Filtering: The FDA raised the statistical threshold for signal detection too high, excluding an estimated 117 additional signals. In total, 763 signals were lost, plus 580 “borderline” cases warranting further scrutiny.These signals represent potential risks under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) laws, requiring FDA investigation without proving causality. David criticizes a “double standard”: efficacy claims were accepted on probabilistic evidence, while safety concerns demanded ironclad proof, eroding trust in regulatory decisions and VAERS as the nation’s early warning system. Notably, the analysis revealed imbalances favouring Janssen signals (110 of 124 in an April 2022 FDA report) over Pfizer (8) and Moderna (6), despite the latter’s far greater usage (5–9 times more doses). After adjustments, Janssen still showed 5–8 times more signals, often hematological (e.g., thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, or TTS). David argues the 2021 TTS pause distracted from broader issues, like myocarditis signals emerging in February 2021 but not acknowledged until May. The Brighton Collaboration: Obscuring HarmsMaria critiques the Brighton Collaboration’s standardized definitions for adverse events following immunization (AEFI), originally designed for conventional vaccines in the early 2000s. Its algorithmic, high-threshold approach, she argues, is mismatched for mRNA pro-vaccines, which involve a “pharmacological phase” (mRNA translation) before immune activation. Key concerns include:* Catch-All Categories: Events like racing heartbeats are often classified as “immunization stress-related responses” (ISRR) or anxiety, bypassing deeper investigation. Take for instance the Maddie de Garay case, a Pfizer adolescent trial participant, whose disabling symptoms were dismissed as anxiety despite life-altering injuries (Maddie remains dependent on her feeding tube and wheelchair). * Causality Hurdles: Updated in 2019, the WHO-aligned criteria demand population-level data and temporal proof, nearly impossible for new platforms. “Unclassifiable” events pile up, unlike standard pharmacovigilance where they’re deemed “improbable.” Maria notes this enabled quick labeling for myocarditis only because of prior vaccine precedents (e.g., smallpox), not robust new evidence.She calls for reevaluating AEFI criteria to better capture mRNA-specific risks, ensuring informed consent via accurate labeling.The Second Paper: Regulatory Failures and the 248 Questions FDAPrompted by Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo’s 2023 letter on DNA contamination and FDA’s Dr. Peter Marks’ response, the second preprint, authored by David and Maria—”Great Expectations and Generous Reading of Guidelines Underestimate Potential Risk”—dissects oversight failures in manufacturing, safety testing, and quality. It culminates in 248 scientific questions for the FDA, highlighting gaps in oversight that remain largely unaddressed.* Biodistribution and Persistence: No comprehensive human studies exist on mRNA/spike protein distribution or duration. Maria stresses that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) don’t uniformly transfect cells or produce protein—luciferase proxy studies mislead due to its short half-life. Recent data show mRNA persisting up to 703 days, contradicting “arm-localized” claims.* DNA Contamination and Genotoxicity: SV40 promoter sequences and residual DNA exceed guidelines (10 ng/dose, claiming no regulator had asked! Moderna’s equivocal genotoxicity studies were partially omitted from FDA summaries. David debunks Marks’ nuclear-entry impossibility by noting mitosis dissolves the membrane, enabling integration risks—as preliminarily shown in vitro by labs like Dr. Phillip Buckhault’s.* Manufacturing and Frameshifting: EMA queries on truncated mRNA and unintended proteins (e.g., via ribosomal frameshifting) received evasive answers. The 248 questions probe these, plus LNP instability, drug interactions, and untested batch variations.Click below to support the critical, ongoing research of Dr. David Wiseman and Maria Gutschi, uncovering vital truths about vaccine safety and regulatory oversight.If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

New Landmark Study Exposes Fetal Loss Safety Signal Post-Pfizer Covid Shot

Jun 3000:40:56Tap to summarize

Josh Guetzkow, a senior lecturer at Hebrew University with a PhD in sociology from Princeton and a Harvard postdoc in public health policy, discussed his groundbreaking preprint study with me. The study, conducted with co-authors including Retsef Levi, Tracy Beth Høeg, Joseph Fraiman, and Maccabi Health Services experts, analyzed fetal loss rates among over 220,000 pregnancies in Israel’s Maccabi Health Services database (2016–2022). Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Using an advanced observed-to-expected analysis, Guetzkow’s team found a significant safety signal: women vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 shot during gestational weeks 8–13 experienced ~4 additional fetal losses per 100 pregnancies compared to the expected 9 (13 observed). Notably, over half of these losses were stillbirths (post-week 20), with nearly half occurring after week 25! These findings contrast with lower-than-expected losses for influenza-vaccinated women, suggesting a healthy vaccinee effect.Unlike prior studies, which missed this critical safety signal- by focusing only on early pregnancy or separating miscarriages from stillbirths, the study authors used individual-level health records to adjust for comorbidities and other factors, enhancing reliability. The signal was dose-specific, with two doses (first and second) showing a stronger effect (4 excess losses) than a single third dose (2 excess losses) during pregnancy. Guetzkow highlighted the absence of clinical trials for pregnant women and criticized public health authorities for recommending vaccination despite known risks, such as lipid nanoparticle placental transfer documented in Pfizer’s own reports, which I covered in early 2023, after being one of the first researchers to discover Pfizer’s 8-page damning document, buried in the FDA’s Pfizer data dump. Guetzkow debunked misleading claims about 82% miscarriage rates that discredit valid concerns. He also refuted conspiracy theories about Israel receiving placebo vaccines, noting early adverse event reports, including myocarditis, from the Israeli population.I highly recommend reading Guetzkow’s substack article on this groundbreaking study.Download the study here. Below is a link to an Israeli documentary mentioned in the interview.The testimonies project - a platform for all those who were affected after the corona vaccineIt’s worth watching my previous interview with Guetzkow, where he was one of the first researchers to expose Pfizer’s “Bait-and-Switch.” If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

🚩Call To Halt The COVID-19 mRNA Shots

Mar 22, 202500:55:35Tap to summarize

In this compelling interview, consultant pharmacist Maria Gutschi, BScPhm, PharmD, delivers a thorough analysis of the numerous manufacturing “red flags” tied to the COVID-19 mRNA injections, spotlighting what she terms Pfizer’s “hard fraud.” She reveals her deep concerns about the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding manufacturing issues, contamination, and regulatory oversight. Before diving into her insights, it’s important to revisit the DNA/SV40 contamination scandal, which underscores the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) concerns raised by Maria in the interview. Over the last two years, numerous independent labs across the United States, Canada, Germany, Japan, France and more recently the Czech Republic, have verified the presence of plasmid DNA—significantly exceeding the regulatory cap of 10 ng/dose—in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna’s COVID-19 injections with SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence specifically identified in the Pfizer/BioNTech’s product. This alarming discovery was initially uncovered by Kevin McKernan in April 2023. My earlier investigations on this scandal can be read below. Manufacturing red flagsIn early 2021, Maria Gutschi began her own research on what she calls Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech’s “gene-therapy products.” While digging though the European Medicine Agency’s EPARs (European Public Assessment Reports) on the mRNA vaccines, she was shocked at its content. Unlike typical EPARs she had reviewed over a decade, this one listed numerous "specific obligations"- legally binding requirements for manufacturers, particularly around manufacturing quality- that were unprecedented in scope and focus. Maria emphasized that for biologics like mRNA vaccines, "the process is the product," meaning manufacturing flaws directly affect safety and efficacy.Whenever you manufacture a biologic, it is always a problem getting the purity right, because the process is the product.The process on how you make a biological is what you end up with.The EPAR highlighted significant manufacturing concerns, including:* Purity and Consistency: The EMA flagged multiple unresolved issues, such as ensuring the spike protein produced was authentic and consistent across batches.* Specific Obligations: Unlike usual clinical trial follow-ups, five or six obligations focused on manufacturing, which Maria found unusual and indicative of deeper problems.DNA contamination findingsMaria became involved in investigating DNA contamination in the vaccine vials. Notably, she was co-author of the preprint paper by Speicher et al., published in October 2023, which confirmed Kevin McKernan’s troubling findings of DNA/SV40 contamination in the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vials vastly exceeeding the regulatory cap. The presence of plasmid DNA with regulatory sequences (e.g., SV40 in Pfizer) and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) enabling cellular entry raised concerns about genomic integration and biological activity.Other key issues explored* Blotgate Scandal: Maria discussed how BioNTech dismissed Western blot anomalies (unusual spike protein sizes) as glycosylation (sugar attachments), a claim the EMA accepted without sufficient follow-up. This specific obligation remains unmet as of 2025. (My investigation into this scandal can be read here.)* Ribosomal Frameshifting: A Cambridge study (December 2023) confirmed mRNA vaccines could cause frameshifting, leading to aberrant proteins with unknown effects (e.g., toxicity, autoimmunity). * SV40 Contamination: Found in Pfizer vaccines, the SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence (with an origin of replication) can amplify itself, block the p53 tumor suppressor gene, and potentially promote oncogenes, raising cancer risks. Health Canada was shocked by this undisclosed contamination but took no decisive action after Pfizer resisted accountability.* Lipid Nanoparticles: Maria criticized their classification as excipients (inactive ingredients), noting their reactive nature and ability to deliver contaminants (DNA, RNA, metals) into cells, bypassing normal regulatory mechanisms- a "Trojan horse" effect increasing risks like DNA integration.Canadian Open LetterMaria has spearheaded an open letter that will be sent on March 31 to Canadian MPs, senators, and provincial health officers, highlighting:* Health Canada’s Findings: FOI requests (ATIPs) revealed regulators’ concerns about DNA variability, SV40, LNPs, frameshifting, and IgG4 immune tolerance, yet action was stifled.* Demands: Recall the vaccines due to risk outweighing benefits, reclassify them as gene therapies (not vaccines), and fund independent lab studies to investigate mechanisms and adverse events.* SV40 Cover-Up: Pfizer’s failure to disclose SV40 violated WHO guidelines, constituting "hard fraud," with Health Canada’s response squashed internally despite initial efforts to address it.If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

A Voice for the Voiceless: The Advocate & The Politician

Mar 2, 202500:45:48Tap to summarize

In this revelatory interview, Covid vaccine injury advocate Anne Merel Kloosterman joins forces with Wybren van Haga, leader of the Dutch BVNL party, to expose a series of what appears to be, Covid-related cover-ups orchestrated by the Dutch government.Key moments from the interview include:* Covid vaccine-injured individuals in the Netherlands are forced to conceal the true cause of their injuries, labeling them as “Long Covid” to secure any compensation from the government.* Anne Merel Kloosterman recounts her heart-wrenching personal story of Covid vaccine injury and highlights her collaboration with Wybren van Haga—the only Dutch MP to openly challenge the government’s harsh Covid measures from the outset.* Wybren van Haga discloses how a pre-parliamentary Covid investigation group, in which he was a member of, was abruptly dismantled due to the Dutch government’s fear of the truths it might uncover.* The BVNL party leader details his party’s legal battle against the Dutch government over oppressive Covid curfews and their efforts to gain access to the confidential recordings of the Outbreak Management Team (OMT).* Kloosterman and van Haga explain their motivations for starting the Corona Damage Foundation, which seeks justice for those harmed by Covid vaccines, as well as the countless businesses driven to bankruptcy by lockdown mandates.For those interested in supporting the foundation, donations can be made via the link below.https://stichtingcoronaschade.nl/If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation. Get full access to Sonia Elijah investigates at www.soniaelijah.com/subscribe

Transcribe →

All episodes

Interview with Michael from Cafe Locked Out: Exposing the COVID Lies and the Rise of Digital Authoritarianism

Going LIVE with Dr Drew

My Recent Interview on RCR with Paul Brennan – Exposing the Machinery Behind the COVID Response and What's Coming Next

Exclusive Interview: DNA Contamination in COVID Shots Amidst Retraction Wars and Cyber Censorship

"Disinformation Dozen" Survivor—Sayer Ji Speaks Out

Excess Deaths and Hidden Data: Dr Clare Craig on Her Landmark Case Against the UKHSA

🚨"763 COVID Shot Safety Signals were LOST!"

New Landmark Study Exposes Fetal Loss Safety Signal Post-Pfizer Covid Shot

🚩Call To Halt The COVID-19 mRNA Shots

A Voice for the Voiceless: The Advocate & The Politician