The Stephen A. Smith Show – Full Episode Summary
Release Date: December 13, 2024
Episode Title: Stephen A. Criticized for Defending Jay Z. FBI Informants Present on January 6? NFL Linebacker Refuses to Play.

Introduction

In this compelling episode of The Stephen A. Smith Show, Stephen A. Smith delves into some of the most talked-about controversies of the week, blending his unfiltered opinions with in-depth discussions alongside top analysts. From the high-stakes legal battles surrounding Jay Z to explosive revelations about FBI informants during the January 6 Capitol riot, and a shocking incident in the NFL, Smith covers it all with his signature vigor.

1. Jay Z Lawsuit and Stephen A.'s Defense

Timestamp: 01:12 – 12:44

The episode opens with Stephen A. addressing the recent lawsuit filed against music mogul Jay Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs. The suit alleges that both artists were involved in the rape of a 13-year-old girl over two decades ago. Jay Z has vehemently denied these accusations, calling out attorney Tony Busby for what he perceives as an extortion attempt.

Key Points:

• Jay Z's Response: Jay Z issued a strong defense, urging Busby to pursue criminal charges instead of a civil suit. He stated,

  "These allegations are so heinous in nature that I implore you to file a criminal complaint, not a civil one. Whomever would commit such a crime against a minor should be locked away."
  (Timestamp: 04:00)

• Impact on Business: Despite the grave allegations, the NFL Commissioner, Roger Goodell, has stated that ROC Nation’s partnership with the NFL remains unaffected. Goodell remarked,

  "We are aware of the civil allegations and Jay Z's really strong response to that. Our relationship is not changing with them, including our preparations for the next Super Bowl."
  (Timestamp: 11:30)

• Stephen A.'s Personal Defense: Drawing from his long-term relationships, Smith expressed unwavering support for Jay Z, emphasizing his personal knowledge of Jay Z’s character.

  "If you've known somebody for 25 years, do you not have the right to say, I've known that person for 25 years? I can't imagine him being guilty of such a thing."
  (Timestamp: 08:15)

Smith underscores the emotional toll and frustration of having to defend a close acquaintance publicly, highlighting the complexities of personal loyalty versus public scrutiny.

2. In-Depth Discussion with Legal Analyst Daniel Jeremiah

Timestamp: 16:03 – 36:40

Stephen A. brings on ABC and ESPN legal analyst Daniel Jeremiah to unpack the legal intricacies of the Jay Z case and its broader implications.

Key Points:

• Understanding the Demand Letter: Jeremiah explains that a demand letter is typically a lawyer’s attempt to initiate a settlement or mediation in civil disputes.

  "A demand letter sent by Tony Busby was essentially asking Jay Z to settle the claim of assault through mediation rather than facing public litigation."
  (Timestamp: 16:32)

• Jay Z's Perception of Extortion: Jay Z views the demand letter as an extortion attempt because it threatens public exposure unless he cooperates financially.

  "From his perspective, it's an extortion attempt because if he doesn't cooperate with the mediation, his name is exposed."
  (Timestamp: 17:56)

• Comparison to Diddy Combs Case: Jeremiah draws parallels to the Diddy Combs situation, noting differences in allegations and the potential for broader investigations if the case progresses.

  "The Jay Z case is different from the Diddy case as there's no suggestion of a criminal enterprise, but involvement in similar high-profile allegations attracts significant attention from investigators."
  (Timestamp: 25:07)

• Statute of Limitations and Evidence: The discussion touches on the challenges posed by the 24-year gap since the alleged incident, including the statute of limitations and availability of evidence.

  "Given that the incident occurred in 2000, the statute of limitations may complicate criminal charges, though civil proceedings can still proceed."
  (Timestamp: 23:09)

Jeremiah emphasizes the uncertainty surrounding the case, highlighting the importance of awaiting further evidence and legal developments.

3. FBI Informants Report on January 6

Timestamp: 42:07 – 70:28

Shifting gears, Stephen A. addresses a bombshell report from the Justice Department revealing that the FBI had at least 26 confidential informants present during the January 6 Capitol riot. This revelation has stirred significant debate and political commentary.

Key Points:

• Details of the Report: The Justice Department disclosed that out of the 26 informants, only three were instructed to observe potential domestic terrorist suspects, while the remaining 23 attended the event independently, engaging in illegal activities.

• Political Reactions: Vice President-elect J.D. Vance criticized the revelation, stating,

  "So 23 folks for the FBI were in the crowd and we're just finding that out. Didn't hear anything about that for the election."
  (Timestamp: 60:39)

• Stephen A.'s Commentary: Smith expresses frustration over what he perceives as the Democratic Party’s lack of transparency and accountability, questioning the integrity of their narratives during the election and beyond.

  "I'm really, really sick and tired of every time I turn around finding something else that the Democrats have lied about or downplayed or misrepresented along the way."
  (Timestamp: 61:43)

• Broader Implications: The discussion touches on the potential impacts on public trust and the ongoing political tensions, with Smith arguing that such revelations undermine the credibility of Democratic narratives and bolster criticisms from opponents like Donald Trump.

4. NFL Linebacker Refuses to Play

Timestamp: 40:05 – 44:44

A controversial incident in the NFL serves as the next hot topic, where San Francisco 49ers linebacker Devondre Campbell refused to enter the game after two teammates were injured, subsequently leaving the field during the fourth quarter.

Key Points:

• Incident Overview: Campbell, a seasoned linebacker, was called to replace injured players but declined, exiting the game and leaving the team frustrated.

  "He's done. It's over. It's over."
  (Timestamp: 40:05)

• Team and Player Reactions: Teammates and coaches expressed disappointment, with quarterback Javarius Ward labeling Campbell’s actions as "sucker stuff" and suggesting he might be cut from the team.

  "If he didn't want to play, he shouldn't have dressed out. He could have told them that before the game."
  (Timestamp: 42:00)

• Stephen A.'s Opinion: Smith vehemently criticizes Campbell’s decision, comparing it to abandoning soldiers in battle and deeming it unforgivable, asserting that such behavior could end a player’s career.

  "This is the epitome of leaving a soldier on the field, in the field of battle. That is the epitome of abandoning your teammates. That is the epitome of selling out. It is unforgivable."
  (Timestamp: 43:20)

Smith underscores the importance of team cohesion and accountability, emphasizing that Campbell's actions betray the fundamental principles of professional sportsmanship.

5. Sports Highlights and Personal Commentary

Timestamp: 44:44 – 70:28

Beyond the heavy topics, Smith also shares insights and highlights from the sports world, celebrating achievements and analyzing performances.

Key Highlights:

• Caitlin Clark Named TIME Athlete of the Year:
  Clark acknowledges her white privilege and emphasizes the importance of elevating Black women in sports.

  "The more we can elevate black women, that's going to be a beautiful thing."
  (Timestamp: 57:45)

• Bronnie James’ Performance:
  Highlighting Bronnie James' standout game for the South Bay Lakers, Smith praises his efforts in the G League, drawing parallels to his father, LeBron James.

  "Bronnie, who was the 55th pick in the NBA Draft, is now averaging 14 points, three and a half rebounds and 2.5 assists in four games in the G League. I'm just happy he got action."
  (Timestamp: 60:42)

• Travis Hunter’s Awards:
  Celebrating Hunter’s impressive haul of postseason awards and his status as a Heisman Trophy favorite, Smith extols his academic and athletic prowess.

  "He clearly should win the Heisman, that kid from Boise State. That running back ain't no joke, though. But I'm Travis Hunter all day, every day."
  (Timestamp: 63:25)

Smith uses these segments to highlight emerging talents and commend their contributions to sports, blending enthusiasm with constructive criticism.

6. Political Commentary and Frustration

Timestamp: 61:43 – 70:28

Throughout the episode, Smith interweaves political commentary, expressing frustration with the Democratic Party’s actions and perceived inconsistencies.

Key Points:

• Critique of Democratic Transparency: Smith questions the Democrats' financial practices and their handling of allegations, highlighting perceived hypocrisy.

  "Where's the one and a half billion dollars that was given to the Democratic Party? Where is it?"
  (Timestamp: 62:00)

• Frustration with Media Narratives: He challenges the accuracy and honesty of media representations, especially concerning high-profile political figures and scandals.

  "They seem right. I would love to argue with Sean Hannity. How can I?"
  (Timestamp: 64:00)

• Impact on Public Trust: Smith argues that these revelations and perceived double standards have eroded public trust in the Democratic Party, reinforcing narratives of corruption and deceit.

Conclusion

In this episode, Stephen A. Smith delivers a potent mix of passionate commentary, expert analysis, and sports highlights. From defending a close friend against serious allegations to dissecting political scandals and condemning unethical behavior in sports, Smith's unflinching approach offers listeners a candid look into the issues shaping today's cultural and political landscape. Whether agreeing with his stance or not, The Stephen A. Smith Show ensures that no topic is off-limits, maintaining its reputation as a platform that entertains, informs, and motivates its audience.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps:

• "These allegations are so heinous in nature that I implore you to file a criminal complaint, not a civil one." — Jay Z (04:00)

• "If you've known somebody for 25 years, do you not have the right to say, I've known that person for 25 years?" — Stephen A. Smith (08:15)

• "That is the epitome of leaving a soldier on the field, in the field of battle. That is the epitome of abandoning your teammates. That is the epitome of selling out. It is unforgivable." — Stephen A. Smith (43:20)

• "The more we can elevate black women, that's going to be a beautiful thing." — Caitlin Clark (57:45)

• "I'm Travis Hunter all day, every day." — Stephen A. Smith (63:25)

Final Thoughts

This episode exemplifies Stephen A. Smith's ability to navigate complex and sensitive topics with a blend of personal insight and authoritative discussion. His interactions with legal expert Daniel Jeremiah provide a nuanced understanding of ongoing legal battles, while his fervent opinions on sports and politics engage listeners to think critically about the narratives presented to them.