
Loading summary
Isaac Mizrahi
At&t has a new guarantee because most things in life are not guaranteed like getting through self checkout by yourself. Not guaranteed in a world where Nothing is guaranteed. AT&T is bringing something new to the table. AT&T is introducing a guarantee with connectivity you can depend on, deals you want and service you deserve or they make it right. Learn more@att.com guarantee at&t connecting changes everything. Terms and conditions apply. Visit att.com guaranty for details. Hi, I'm Isaac Mizrahi and I've got a new podcast called hello Isaac. During my career, I've made friends with some amazing celebrities and experts and I'm always curious about their paths to success. On this podcast I get to share our fun and intimate conversations with you friends like Andy Cohen, Margaret Cho, Benda lacreme, Belinda Carlile, Jesse Tyler Ferguson and Carson Kressley, just to name a few. Listen to hello Isaac on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Stephen A. Smith
The first order of business in the world of politics. Cuz I don't know if y'all saw what the hell happened on TV today. Live, national television, live international television as well. Y'all got to see this if y'all haven't said it, because that's exactly where I'm getting started. It's in the nation's capital with a nation saw President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. vance have a testy exchange with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelinsky. It all happened in front of reporters during their meeting at the White House this afternoon with the cameras rolling. Keep that in mind. During the meeting, Trump called the Ukrainian president disrespectful, end quote, and said, quote, you don't have the cards. You, end quote, when it comes to resolving the current war versus Russia. Just to put this in perspective, this three minutes of video, ladies and gentlemen, let me tell you, it is worth every second for you to listen to this. I did not want to take this out. It's going to be about three minutes. It is worth listening to this exchange between Zelinsky and Vice President Vance and President Trump in the Oval Office with the cameras rolling for the nation to see live. Check it out.
Volodymyr Zelensky
What kind of diplomacy, J.D. you are speaking about. What? What, what do you mean?
J.D. Vance
I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country.
Volodymyr Zelensky
Yes, but if you.
J.D. Vance
Mr. President, Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office, try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conflict.
Volodymyr Zelensky
Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?
J.D. Vance
I have been to come once. I have actually. I've actually watched and seen the stories. And I know what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour. Mr. President, do you disagree that you've had problems bringing people into your military? And do you think that it's respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?
Volodymyr Zelensky
A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning.
Isaac Mizrahi
Sure.
Volodymyr Zelensky
First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don't feel now, but you will feel it in the future. God bless.
Donald Trump
You don't know that.
Volodymyr Zelensky
God bless. God bless. You got it.
Donald Trump
Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel.
Volodymyr Zelensky
I'm not telling you because you're in.
Donald Trump
No position to dictate that.
Stephen A. Smith
Remember this.
Donald Trump
You're in no position to dictate what we're going to feel. We're going to feel very good. We're going to feel very good and very strong.
Volodymyr Zelensky
You will feel influence.
Donald Trump
You're right now not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position. And he happens to be right about.
Volodymyr Zelensky
From the very beginning of the war.
Donald Trump
You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards right now, you don't miss it. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War Three. You're gambling with World War Three. And what you're doing is very disappointing, disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.
J.D. Vance
Have you said thank you once this entire meeting? No. In this entire meeting. Have you said thank you? You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country.
Volodymyr Zelensky
Please. You think that if you will speak very loudly about the war.
Donald Trump
He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble.
Volodymyr Zelensky
Can I help you?
Donald Trump
Wait a minute. No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.
Volodymyr Zelensky
I know you're not winning.
Donald Trump
You're not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of us.
Volodymyr Zelensky
Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we've been alone, and we are thankful. I said stay.
Donald Trump
You haven't been.
Volodymyr Zelensky
This cabinet we gave you through this.
Donald Trump
Stupid president, $350 billion. We gave you military equipment, and you men are brave, but they had to use our military. If you didn't have our military equipment, you invited have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.
Volodymyr Zelensky
In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days. This is something maybe less. In two weeks. Of course, yes.
Donald Trump
It's going to be a very hard thing to do, because business like this.
Stephen A. Smith
Shortly afterwards, Zelensky left the White House without signing a deal for the US to receive revenue from Ukraine's mineral supply in exchange for military assistance. President Trump said he's, quote, determined that President Zelensky is not ready for peace if America is involved, end quote. I'm pro America. Let me get that out the way first. I'm an American citizen, and I'm going to try to give us the benefit of the doubt, knowing that we have an abundance of flaws as a nation in terms of our historical involvement in foreign affairs. There is no doubt about that. On one hand, there are two sides to this story. On one hand, if you're President Zelensky for Ukraine, who did campaign, shouldn't say campaign, but was very supportive, as Vice President Vance pointed out, very supportive of the Biden administration because they did give you over $350 million, they did give you nearly 500 million worth of weapons, or they committed to that, knowing the level of support that the Biden administration had given to Ukraine. How vociferous Biden was in his support for Ukraine. And by the way, that's going across the y'all, because you got Senator Lindsey Graham on the Republican side that has also been an avid supporter of Ukraine and their mission to ward off Russia taking over their sovereign territory. I would look at Zelensky and I would say, not very smart to be butting heads with this administration in this White House at that particular moment in time. Trump is not wrong when he said, you don't have all the cards. You don't have the cards. He's absolutely right about that, because Zelinsky does not. Ukraine does not. It's projected that over a million lives have been lost. Vast Majority of them being from Ukraine. And when you're in a war torn, a war torn country and you don't have the muscle and the might, and Russia has already been gaining ground, it might behoove you to come across as a bit more cordial with the present President of the United States. Fair enough.
Mina Kimes
That does not negate the fact that.
Stephen A. Smith
Trump advance came across as bullies.
Mina Kimes
It does not negate the fact that Vance brought up something as trivial, talking about, you should say thank you and accusing him of being disrespectful when Vance was the one that was talking. And then Zelinsky, they said, it's your turn to speak. And Zelinsky said, hey, have you been to Ukraine? Do you know how many people. We're in a war, we're experiencing it. And when he asked Vice President Vance had he been there, he stumbled before acknowledging he hadn't been there. He had read and saw footage of what's happening in Ukraine. It's safe to say that's not the same as being there. And for me personally, I didn't look at Zelensky as disrespectful. I looked at him trying to get in a word because I looked at the Vice President chastising him for not being grateful and the President piggybacking off of that to pounce on him some more about not understanding his plight and being thankful for the ceasefire that America has intervened to try and negotiate so this war between Russia and Ukraine can come to an end. Now, is it wrong for President Trump to finagle his way into the proceedings to get some of their minerals in exchange for U.S. support, or in an effort to recoup something for what they've given out to Ukraine?
Stephen A. Smith
Not at all.
Mina Kimes
As the United States of America, we're giving and giving and giving. Those are taxpayer dollars. We have a right to get something in return if we can pull it off. I get that part. I'm not disagreeing with President Trump about that. See, this is where the centrist in me comes in. I'm not siding with Trump just because I got conservative views and I'm not siding with Zelensky just because I have liberal views. I, I'm siding with common sense. Zelensky, knowing how much you need America's support, you need to be a bit more cordial and play a little nicer than that. The flip side to it is that he's at war. He has to depart from the United States of America, go back to Ukraine in a war torn country with bombs being dropped on his people on his territory, and he's saying, wait a minute, y'all are talking to me like I should have no sensitivity to my plight or to my people and should just throw up my arms and surrender and capitulate to what Trump has negotiated. Let's hold on for a second here. During the Biden. I'm sorry, during the Obama administration in 2014, Russia did take over Crimea. If I remember correctly, that did happen. And when they took over Crimea, that was a part of Ukraine. Now it's established as Russian territory. And for Russia to start this war with Ukraine, to take over parts of mainland Ukraine, they're right there to do it. And Zelinsky was interrupted when he was making the point that when we negotiated back then, the negotiation that involved France, England and others said it was going to be a ceasefire. Putin disavowed that, ignored it, and ultimately restarted war in 2022. So what he's saying is a ceasefire isn't enough. Now we need security that we don't have to concern ourselves with Putin ultimately invading more of our territory, moving forward to just stop the fighting for the time being. He can't be trusted. And what Trump and them is saying is, well, you better trust them by trusting us, because this is the best.
Stephen A. Smith
That you're going to get.
Mina Kimes
Well, the Ukrainians are saying, we at war now. We on death door. We on death's door. We might as well go down swinging. Ladies and gentlemen, who are we to.
Stephen A. Smith
Argue with that position? Who are we to argue with that position?
Mina Kimes
This man is the leader of Ukraine, despite the fact that, quote, unquote, according to Trump, they are losing the war. There is no doubt that they have fought valiantly. Even Trump admitted their soldiers have fought valiantly, albeit with US Weapons. I don't want to hear that they fought valiantly. That's what they did. Putin is considered a dictator, has been labeled a murderer and all of this other stuff, and the only person that speaks glowingly about him is Trump. I'm talking about what he says, I'm not talking about what he does, because I don't have all the intel about what he's done with or for Russia.
Stephen A. Smith
But come on, this man, Zelinsky, is.
Mina Kimes
At war with, defending the very survival of his nation. And he's telling you that a ceasefire ain't gonna cut the mustard, because this man, Putin, has ignored ceasefire agreement. Ceasefire agreement before, and what he needs is security that the war will come to an end. And it won't be a ceasefire. It will be protection by the involvement of the United States or anybody else, to ensure that he no longer attacks, not that he just stops for the time being. And he's saying that this agreement doesn't provide that. And we're going to engage in condemnation about this man and be petty and talk about how you come into the Oval Office in the United States of America. Well, sir, how did he do that? President Trump, how did he do that? Vice President Vance? He didn't come into the Oval Office on his own, by the way. He didn't have his interpreter either. He came in there by himself, and y'all are interrupting him. Listen, that's like me speaking Spanish or French. If I know the language a little bit, could you at least be quiet and let me speak? Because it's a challenge for me to speak your language. It's a challenge for him to speak fluent English. It's a challenge for him to make sure that he cogently and fluidly gets his thoughts across. Could you have let him finish speaking? Vance didn't do that. Trump didn't do that. So, no, Zelensky didn't handle it right. And, no, he should not have been as cantankerous as a politician. As a leader, you have to be a bit more composed than that. Guilty as charged.
Stephen A. Smith
But that ain't his Oval Office.
Mina Kimes
That's ours. The person residing in it is. Donald Trump is the President of the United States.
Stephen A. Smith
With Vance there, Zelinsky ain't there without their invite.
Mina Kimes
Those cameras are not there without Trump.
Stephen A. Smith
And his administration's invite.
Mina Kimes
They allowed that environment to exist. This isn't Zelensky and Ukraine facilitating all of this. This was them.
Stephen A. Smith
And we gonna just look at him like he's the villain. Can we at least acknowledge that there must be a level of understanding to the fact that the man is fighting for Ukraine's very survival as a sovereign nation, and that the circumstances upon which he's living and which he's scheduled to go back to is not the same as President Trump and Vice President Vance and what they have to deal with here in the United States of America. They may have been right in some of the things that they were saying, but they were also bullies. And this man who's literally on the battlefield responded, whether it's a soldier or general or whatever, that's how he responded. Because they ain't the ones that got bombs being dropped on them. He does. On their hospitals, on their schools, on child care facilities everywhere. I'm sorry, I'm not saying that President Trump and Vice President Vance was totally wrong. In the things that they were saying. Once again, the art of decorum and decency play a role in all of this. You could actually do both and be right. You didn't have to do that. For all we know, Zelensky might be dead in a month for a bomb being dropped on someplace where he's at. We ain't worried about that with President Trump and Vice President Vance. America hasn't lost nearly a million lives in this war over the last two years. I mean, damn. That's all I'm saying. We ain't talking politics conservative, liberal. We're talking about leadership from our statesmen, the President of the United States and how that was handled. It looked elementary. It was embarrassing, and Zelensky didn't handle it right. But if your country was being bombed into oblivion and you needed assistance and the President of the United States was speaking more favorably about Putin than he was about you, and then you were getting lectured by the vice president who's never been to Ukraine, who hasn't seen the war torn territory, and he's getting on you for not being grateful, how would you have reacted? I don't know an answer to that question, but I know it's a legitimate damn question.
Greg Rosenthal
What's up, everyone? It's Greg Rosenthal and I'm teaming up with the King of Spring, Daniel Jeremiah. He requires me to say that we're going to be bringing you 40s and free agents, the only podcast you'll need this NFL draft season. From DJs, mock drafts to my top 101, free agents will have it covered for you with all new episodes every Thursday keeping you up to date as we head to the NFL Draft. Listen to 40s and free agents starting on March 6th on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Stephen A. Smith
What's up, everyone?
Mina Kimes
Julie Swearbinks here along with former NHL player Nate Thompson.
J.D. Vance
We're doing a new podcast together. Here we go.
Mina Kimes
The name Energy Line with Nate and jsb.
J.D. Vance
Each week we'll get together and talk about hockey life. All topics are fair game, right?
Mina Kimes
Exactly. And you'll never know who will drop by to join us.
J.D. Vance
Julie is pretty well connected. She has text threads going that you wouldn't believe.
Mina Kimes
Listen to Energyline with Nate and jsb on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Release Date: March 2, 2025
Podcast: The Stephen A. Smith Show
Host: Stephen A. Smith
Produced by: Stephen A. Smith and iHeartPodcasts
In this riveting episode of The Stephen A. Smith Show, host Stephen A. Smith delves into a highly charged and unprecedented exchange that occurred in the nation's capital. The focal point of the discussion revolves around a tense meeting in the White House where former President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance clashed verbally with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. This confrontation was captured live on national and international television, sparking widespread debate and analysis.
a. Initial Confrontation and Accusations
The episode begins with Smith highlighting the gravity of the moment when President Trump labeled Ukrainian President Zelensky as "disrespectful" and accused him of lacking the necessary leverage to resolve the ongoing conflict with Russia.
b. Exchange Highlights
The transcript captures several key moments, showcasing the intensity of the discussion:
Zelensky [02:29]:
"What kind of diplomacy, J.D. you are speaking about. What? What, what do you mean?"
Vance [02:34]:
"I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country."
Trump [02:55]:
"You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards right now, you don't miss it. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're gambling with World War Three. [...]"
Zelensky [05:12]:
"Mr. President, we are staying in our country, staying strong. From the very beginning of the war, we've been alone, and we are thankful."
Trump [05:23]:
"$350 billion. We gave you military equipment, and you men are brave, but they had to use our military. If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks."
These exchanges underscore the fundamental disagreements on the U.S.'s role and support in Ukraine's struggle against Russian aggression.
Stephen A. Smith approaches the confrontation with a nuanced perspective, recognizing the complexities of international politics and the inherent flaws within the United States' foreign policy history.
Smith acknowledges Trump's assertion that Zelensky lacks the necessary leverage ("cards") but also emphasizes the dire situation Ukraine faces, with over a million lives lost and Russia gaining ground. He suggests that a more diplomatic and cooperative stance from Zelensky could be beneficial given the current geopolitical landscape.
Journalist Mina Kimes offers a balanced critique, dissecting both Trump and Zelensky's approaches during the meeting. She appreciates Trump's stance on securing U.S. interests but criticizes the manner in which both leaders conducted themselves.
Kimes argues that Zelensky's reaction was understandable given the existential threat Ukraine faces. She underscores the importance of leadership decorum, especially in high-stakes international negotiations, while also acknowledging the necessity for the U.S. to receive value for its substantial military and financial support.
She highlights the strategic considerations behind Ukraine's reluctance to settle for a temporary ceasefire, advocating for a more secure and lasting resolution backed by robust international support.
The episode culminates in a reflection on leadership, diplomacy, and the delicate balance between national interests and global responsibilities. Smith and Kimes collectively emphasize the need for respectful dialogue and strategic alliances in navigating the complexities of international conflicts.
Smith concludes by questioning the efficacy of the confrontation, pondering how such interactions impact international perceptions and the broader mission to secure peace and stability in war-torn regions.
Leadership Under Fire: The meeting showcased the high-pressure environment leaders operate in during international crises.
Diplomatic Nuances: Balancing national interests with global responsibilities remains a critical challenge for world leaders.
Strategic Alliances: The importance of mutual respect and strategic collaboration between allies is paramount in conflict resolution.
Trump [02:55]:
"You don't have the cards right now. [...] You're gambling with World War Three."
Zelensky [05:12]:
"We are staying in our country, staying strong. [...]"
Smith [06:00]:
"It might behoove you to come across as a bit more cordial with the present President of the United States."
Kimes [13:00]:
"Ceasefire agreements before, and ultimately restarted war in 2022."
This episode of The Stephen A. Smith Show offers a deep dive into a pivotal moment in international politics, providing listeners with comprehensive analysis and diverse viewpoints on the fraught interactions between U.S. leadership and Ukrainian resilience.