
Loading summary
Host
You're listening to an iHeart podcast.
Advertiser
At&T has a new guarantee because most things in life are not guaranteed, like getting through self checkout by yourself. Not guaranteed in a world where Nothing is guaranteed. AT&T is bringing something new to the table. AT&T is introducing a guarantee with connectivity. You can depend on your deals you want and service you deserve or they make it right. Learn more@att.com guarantee@&t connecting changes everything. Terms and conditions apply. Visit att.comguarantee for details.
Did you know using your browser in incognito mode doesn't actually protect your privacy? Take back your Privacy with IPVanish VPN. Just one tap and all your data, passwords, communications, browsing history and more will be instantly protected. Ipvanish makes you virtually invisible online. Use Ipvanish on all your devices, anytime you go online, at home, and especially on public wi fi. Get ipvanish now for 70% off a yearly plan with this exclusive offer@ipvanish.com audio.
Host
Now let's get to DC for a variety of reasons, by the way, but first we'll start where President Trump is calling for an investigation into the high profile endorsements of Kamala Harris during the 2024 campaign. The move comes after Bruce Springsteen criticized the president last week during his European tour. Springsteen called the Trump administration, quote, corrupt, incompetent and treasonous in front of a live audience. President Trump didn't take those words too kindly and went on Truth Social with the following quote, how much did Kamala Harris pay Bruce Springsteen for his poor performance during her campaign for president? Why did he accept that money if he is such a fan of hers? Isn't that a major and illegal campaign contribution?
Political Commentator
What about Beyonce and how much went to Oprah and Bono? I'm going to call for a major.
Host
Investigation into this matter. Candidates aren't allowed to pay for endorsements, which is what Kamala did under the guise of paying for entertainment.
Political Commentator
In addition, this was a very expensive.
Host
And desperate effort to to artificially build up sparse crowds. It's not legal for these unpatriotic entertainers. This was just a corrupt and unlawful way to capitalize on a broken system. Thank you for your attention to this matter. End quote. The post from Trump revives previous accusations that the Harris campaign paid Oprah Winfrey and others for campaign appearances and endorsements of the Democratic nominee. Here's the deal. A couple of things to point out. First of all, I want to say this. I think calling for an investigation is a bit extreme. Just because somebody says Something negatively about you, Mr. President, I think you got bigger fish to fry and more important things to matter. You still got the tariff war going on. I know there's a 90 day reprieve with you and China and us in China rather than, I get that part, Ukraine and Russia calling for an immediate ceasefire. According to you. Still important matters, the Israeli Hamas conflict, what's happening, the folks, the Palestinian women and children and stuff like that. And, and, and you having to resolve that issue with Israel and Hamas, Iran being involved. Masin is a proxy to Iran. We get all that. There's a lot of stuff to deal with, man. This ain't that important. So using the word investigation and saying that you're going to call for it is a bit extreme and dare I say, dictatorial and unnecessary, period. Having said that, let me articulate that. I don't disagree with President Trump about everything he said. I do think there's something to be said about going outside of this country and speaking about this country and its present administration that way.
Political Commentator
Let other people say that. But you being an entertainer, going across the world, going across the ocean, wherever.
Host
Bruce Springsteen was, and I forget for.
Political Commentator
The moment where he was, and speaking against the President of the United States that way is problematic. Perfect. To give you a hypothetical, Stephen A. Smith has been outspoken, but if I'm overseas in France, Europe, Switzerland or wherever, or Germany or someplace, I'm not going to be sitting in a foreign country talking about my president that way. Even if I didn't vote for him, he's still a president of the United States and I'm not going to go someplace else speaking about him that way. I might touch on the issues. And I'm not saying you can't disagree with him. I'm not saying that you don't like a policy or an abundance of policies. Well, I don't like the terror. You can say I don't like the tariffs. You can say I don't like what's.
Host
Going on with the war.
Political Commentator
You can say I don't like the.
Host
State of our economy.
Political Commentator
You don't say I don't like the state of our politics. But when you say corrupt, inept and stuff like that on foreign soil.
Host
I.
Political Commentator
Don'T have a problem with the President.
Host
Having a problem with that.
Political Commentator
There's a time and place for every truth. Michael Aaron, Sherry, there's a time and a place. We're not debating truth or falsehood here. We're saying if you are an American, if you about the red, white and.
Host
Blue, there's certain places you don't go and speak that way.
Political Commentator
There's a time and place for everything. Bruce Springsteen knows that better than anybody. Every truth ain't meant to be told at every single time. There's certain things you don't do. As it pertains to Kamala Harris and a Democratic Party paying folks to endorse them. This is not the first time those stories have been broached. Remember Oprah's production company and what it purportedly received? Remember even though there's no evidence that Beyonce was paid a dime, remember what they were saying about her in terms of the connection, how the camp the Harris campaign was able to convince her.
Host
To endorse her publicly?
Political Commentator
We've seen a bevy of folks in.
Host
Hollywood.
Political Commentator
Speaking out for Kamala Harris, but we also knew that they had spent about $1.5 billion. And we're asking ourselves where that money went and who got some of it and for what purpose? Those are legitimate questions. Whether we like it or not. Whether we like it or not. So, again, I think the president should have bigger fish to fry. I don't think this should be a focal point, and I do think he comes across as a bit dictatorial, responding to Bruce Springsteen that way. However.
Host
Don'T sit here and say definitively he's wrong. We don't know that. Not with all the lies we've heard the Democratic Party tell. Talk about us. Let's just get that out the way right now.
Advertiser
Did you know using your browser in incognito mode doesn't actually protect your privacy? Take back your privacy with IPVanish VPN. Just one tap and all your data, passwords, communications, browsing history, and more will be instantly protected. IPVanish makes you virtually invisible online. Use IPVanish on all your devices, anytime you go online, at home, and especially on public Wi Fi. Get IPVanish now for 70% off a yearly plan with this exclusive offer@ipvanish.com audio.
Podcast Host
Why is a soap opera western like Yellowstone so wildly successful? The American west with Dan Flores is the latest show from the Meat Eater Podcast Network. So join me starting Tuesday, May 6, where we'll delve into stories of the west and come to understand how it helps inform the ways in which we experience the region today. Listen to the American west with Dan.
Advertiser
Flores on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Host
You're listening to an iHeart podcast.
Summary of "Stephen A's Take: Stephen A Responds to Springsteen's Anti-Trump Rant"
Release Date: May 20, 2025
Podcast: The Stephen A. Smith Show
Hosts: Stephen A. Smith and iHeartPodcasts
In this episode of The Stephen A. Smith Show, host Stephen A. Smith delves into the recent political fracas involving renowned musician Bruce Springsteen's public criticism of former President Donald Trump and Trump's subsequent allegations against Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. This discussion traverses the realms of sports, entertainment, politics, and societal issues, offering listeners a multifaceted perspective on contemporary political discourse.
The episode kicks off with Stephen A. Smith addressing Bruce Springsteen's vehement denunciation of President Trump during his European tour. Springsteen labeled the Trump administration as "corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous," statements that stirred significant controversy both domestically and internationally.
Bruce Springsteen (00:45): "The Trump administration is corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous."
These remarks were made in front of a live audience, amplifying their impact and eliciting strong responses from various political figures.
Following Springsteen's outburst, former President Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to reprimand Springsteen's statements. Trump shifted the focus from Springsteen's critiques to alleging improper campaign financing by Kamala Harris.
Donald Trump (02:01): "How much did Kamala Harris pay Bruce Springsteen for his poor performance during her campaign for president? Why did he accept that money if he is such a fan of hers? Isn't that a major and illegal campaign contribution?"
Trump expanded his allegations to include other celebrities such as Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey, and Bono, suggesting that their endorsements were not just genuine expressions of support but involved illicit financial transactions.
Donald Trump (02:01): "What about Beyoncé and how much went to Oprah and Bono? I'm going to call for a major investigation into this matter."
Stephen A. Smith critically examines Trump's call for an investigation, questioning its necessity and relevance in the broader spectrum of pressing national and international issues.
Stephen A. Smith (02:20): "Candidates aren't allowed to pay for endorsements, which is what Kamala did under the guise of paying for entertainment."
Smith acknowledges the seriousness of the allegations but contends that Trump's focus on these claims detracts from more substantial concerns facing the nation.
Delving deeper, Smith outlines what he perceives as more critical issues that Trump should be addressing, highlighting ongoing geopolitical conflicts and economic challenges.
Stephen A. Smith (03:09): "You still got the tariff war going on. I know there's a 90-day reprieve with you and China and us in China rather than... Ukraine and Russia calling for an immediate ceasefire... Israeli-Hamas conflict..."
Smith argues that the administration's attention should be directed toward resolving these significant matters rather than engaging in what he views as politically motivated investigations.
A substantial portion of the discussion focuses on the appropriateness and impact of celebrities like Springsteen speaking out against political figures, especially from foreign platforms.
Political Commentator (04:23): "Bruce Springsteen knows that better than anybody. Every truth ain't meant to be told at every single time. There's certain things you don't do."
The commentator emphasizes the responsibility of public figures to exercise discretion in their political expressions, particularly when representing the country abroad.
The episode scrutinizes the nature of campaign endorsements and the legality surrounding financial interactions between political campaigns and celebrities.
Political Commentator (06:09): "We've seen a bevy of folks in Hollywood speaking out for Kamala Harris, but we also knew that they had spent about $1.5 billion. And we're asking ourselves where that money went and who got some of it and for what purpose."
This segment raises questions about the transparency and ethics of campaign financing, suggesting that there may be more to the endorsements than mere support.
Stephen A. Smith maintains a balanced yet skeptical view of Trump's allegations, urging listeners to consider the broader context and the credibility of the claims.
Stephen A. Smith (07:41): "Don't sit here and say definitively he's wrong. We don't know that. Not with all the lies we've heard the Democratic Party tell."
While acknowledging the importance of accountability, Smith cautions against accepting Trump's accusations at face value without substantial evidence.
The episode concludes with a reflection on the interplay between politics and entertainment, emphasizing the need for integrity and focus among political figures. Smith advocates for addressing genuine issues affecting the nation over engaging in contentious rhetoric that may distract from more vital concerns.
Bruce Springsteen's Criticism: Springsteen's strong words against Trump sparked a significant political exchange, highlighting the influence of celebrities in political discourse.
Trump's Allegations: Trump's claims about Kamala Harris and the alleged illegal campaign contributions from celebrities raise questions about campaign finance ethics.
Focus on Priorities: The host argues that Trump's emphasis on these allegations may be misplaced, suggesting that more pressing national and international issues deserve attention.
Role of Public Figures: The discussion underscores the responsibility of entertainers and public figures to handle political commentary thoughtfully, especially in international settings.
Skepticism Towards Claims: Stephen A. Smith encourages a critical examination of Trump's accusations, advocating for evidence-based conclusions rather than accepting unverified claims.
Bruce Springsteen (00:45): "The Trump administration is corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous."
Donald Trump (02:01): "How much did Kamala Harris pay Bruce Springsteen for his poor performance during her campaign for president? ... Isn't that a major and illegal campaign contribution?"
Stephen A. Smith (03:09): "You still got the tariff war going on. ... Israeli-Hamas conflict..."
Political Commentator (04:23): "Bruce Springsteen knows that better than anybody. Every truth ain't meant to be told at every single time."
Stephen A. Smith (07:41): "Don't sit here and say definitively he's wrong. We don't know that."
This comprehensive discussion in The Stephen A. Smith Show provides listeners with an in-depth analysis of the intersection between politics and celebrity influence, urging a nuanced approach to evaluating political claims and focusing on substantive national and international issues.