Loading summary
Minneapolis Community Organizer
Your film is now ready to be shown.
Justin Hendricks
Good morning. I'm Justin Hendricks, editor of Tech Policy Press. We publish news, analysis and perspectives on issues at the intersection of tech and democracy.
Chris Mills
I just saw a video of more.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
Than six masked agents pummeling one of our constituents and shooting him to death.
Justin Hendricks
That was the voice of Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Fry at a press conference yesterday after U.S. border Patrol agents killed Alex Preddy, a 37 year old Minneapolis resident who worked as an ICU nurse. According to the New York Times, the Washington Post, open source investigators such as bellingcat and various other careful accounts. Videos posted to social media show Preddy stepping between a woman and an agent who is pepper spraying her. Preddy is holding a phone in one hand, appearing to film the agents and nothing in the other. Agents pepper spray Preddy, then force him to the ground. The federal agents find a concealed handgun in his waistband at his back and take it from him. After the weapon is removed, an agent shoots Preddy in the back. He appears to continue firing as Preddy collapses. The agents appear to fire additional shots as Preddy lies motionless. As the Times points out, it appears that at least 10 shots were fired within five seconds. The video does not suggest that Preddy brandished the weapon he was carrying, a detail that appears to be corroborated by sworn witness testimony. Here's CNN correspondent Josh Campbell explaining the situation.
Chris Mills
A CNN analysis of videos appears to show a federal officer took the gun from Preddy seconds before another officer fired. Carrying a concealed handgun is allowed in Minnesota with a permit. A bystander video obtained by the Associated.
Minneapolis Councilmember Robin Wansley
Press shows the federal agent shot Preddy.
Chris Mills
Moments after he appeared to be filming them and was pushed back by agents.
Justin Hendricks
But in a press conference, senior Border Patrol official Greg Bovino painted a very different picture.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
This looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.
Justin Hendricks
This same claim was made by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a separate press conference.
Rachel Sayre
This looks like a situation where an individual arrived at the scene to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement.
Justin Hendricks
To many on the ground in Minneapolis, these claims appear to be irreconcilable with the facts, but fit a pattern of sustained violence by federal agents. At the city's press conference, Rachel Sayre, director of Minneapolis Emergency Management, described what she's witnessing.
Rachel Sayre
My background is in international humanitarian response in conflict zones in Yemen, Haiti, Syria, Iraq and Ukraine. What I've seen here is what I've seen there. A powerful entity violently and intentionally terrorizing people, making them afraid to go outside so they can't earn a living, so that kids are forced out of school. This has a lasting generational impact.
Justin Hendricks
The local effort to investigate the event is in full swing. In live coverage of the events on Minnesota Public Radio, host Nina Moyni pointed out that within hours of the shooting, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty released a statement emphasizing the need for Minneapolis police and state police to assess the scene and collect evidence.
Nina Moyni
Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, very soon, within a couple of hours of this incident, this fatal shooting occurring this morning, releasing a statement saying, and I'm paraphrasing, but saying that it's really imperative that Minneapolis police and that state police be able to, you know, have the evidence out there and assess the scene. And there was also a link included for members of the public to submit their own videos.
Justin Hendricks
Minnesota Governor Tim Waltz mentioned the need to collect evidence from the public as well when he addressed the crisis.
Minneapolis Community Organizer
Despite the horrific acts by this federal government, Minnesotans are standing up for the rule of law. They're protesting loudly and urgently but peacefully. It must stay that way. Minnesota Minnesotans are witnessing, and we're creating a log of evidence for the future of prosecution of ICE agents and officials responsible for this.
Justin Hendricks
The question now is whether there will be accountability. On Minnesota Public Radio, Minneapolis Councilmember Robin Wansley spoke to the frustration of people there.
Minneapolis Councilmember Robin Wansley
How is our local police, how is our mayor, how is our governor using their fullest extent of their authority to also make it clear to the ICE agents who are occupying our neighborhoods and our communities that they are not welcome here and that they don't get to brutalize and kill and dust our residents without consequence.
Justin Hendricks
Yesterday's tragedy in Minneapolis is now similar in many ways to many other violent incidents involving federal immigration agents. There is substantial video documentation. There is substantial witness testimony. The evidence is being cataloged and preserved. But my guest today explains that documenting the violent behavior of federal agents is only half the accountability battle.
Chris Mills
This is Chris Mills. Rodrigo. I'm the managing editor of a website called inequality.org, and I'm also a fellow at Tech Policy Press.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
Chris, I'm so pleased to welcome you to the podcast and also to have you as a fellow this year. I'm going to talk a little bit about some reporting that you just done for Tech Policy Press on the collection of video evidence and some of the legal and other complications that arise from that. Just set the scene for us. What patterns are you seeing in terms of ICE raids being documented during Trump's.
Chris Mills
Second Term, I think we're seeing a lot of videos of particularly violent instances during ICE raids going viral on social media, being kind of the foundation for a lot of mass protests. Obviously, we're seeing right now in Minneapolis, two days of pretty mass demonstrations. And these videos are very successful in kind of countering the administration narrative about what this immigration crackdown is. They're saying that they're targeting, you know, violent criminals, but then videos are coming out of them targeting families just driving their kids to school. So these videos are, like, very effective evidence of potential wrongdoing by ice. However, so far, these videos have largely just been about changing narratives and not so much about or not being used so much to pursue legal accountability. So that's kind of where this story comes in.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
You point out in your piece a contradiction, that legally, people have a clear First Amendment right to film ICE agents, yet you reference numerous cases of retaliation. Can you walk us through what you're seeing on the ground when people try to exercise this right?
Chris Mills
Yeah, and I will caution by saying I'm not seeing this, but the folks that I spoke with and, you know, people at places like the ACLU that are getting a lot of reports of this are basically seeing that ICE agents are reacting quite aggressively toward people filming them. This is not just a case of individual officers responding negatively to being filmed, but actually comes from the very top. You've had Kristi Noem saying that filming ICE officers while they're practicing is doxing and could even amount to violence. And you've had other folks at the DHS say that there'll be, you know, prosecutions for people that film ICE and that opposition toward filming is manifesting itself in the ground in terms of, like, people being pushed down, people's phones being knocked out of their hand. And in some cases in this piece, there are reported cases of ICE officers chasing people who are filming for several blocks. There are examples of ICE officers pulling weapons on people that are filming and almost, you know, always explicitly saying, like, we are doing this because you're filming us, and we don't like that you're filming us.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
So the kind of idea that Christine Noem and others are pushing is that filming ICE agents almost constitutes a form.
Justin Hendricks
Of violence against those agents.
Chris Mills
So the legal protections that we have under the First Amendment, we're allowed to film law enforcement officers practicing their duty. This is pretty well established in circuit court opinions as part of the First Amendment. However, that doesn't necessarily protect against cases where the filming is obstructing the ICE officers or just any Law enforcement's duties. So I think the case that they're trying to make, or at least the implicit case here is that people are often filming ICE officers in order to get people away, to help say, look, there are ICE officers at this intersection doing arrests. Don't come here. So I think that the case that they're probably going to make, or at least the case that it seems like they're making, is that in this case, actually just filming officers does amount to obstruction.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
You document several state level efforts in Chicago, New York, Minnesota to systematically collect this footage from witnesses. What are governors, attorneys general, other officials trying to accomplish and how coordinated are these efforts?
Chris Mills
Yeah, this is a really interesting phenomena that has popped up over the last year of, as you mentioned, like state level officials, local officials creating basically portals for people to upload instances of ICE breaking the law. So as you mentioned, in New York State, after some pretty aggressive raids on Canal street in New York City, where I'm based, Attorney General Letitia James set up a portal. And the idea here is that this goes beyond just sort of like the open source data collection that people are already doing, where they're taking social media videos and saying, look, this officer did xyz, but encouraging people to share stuff that they wouldn't already post on social media. This is also happening in Illinois. Former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot started an initiative that encouraged people to send in videos. And Governor JV Pritzker also has started a similar initiative. And then last week in Minnesota, Governor Tim Walls basically in a speech said that people should be sending in videos. However, there doesn't seem to be a place for people to send those videos in yet. On the question of coordination, so far it seems quite minimal. It seems like these are kind of efforts that are responding to specific grades. So in Chicago there was Operation Midway Blitz. In New York, there was the Canal street raids. And they're kind of very focused on those rather than larger trends of illegal action by ice. And some folks that I spoke with that are, you know, long term experts in open source data collection, especially for war crimes and international conflicts. In the past, when new conflicts have emerged, people will reach out to them and say, hey, you know, what have you all learned? Can you help us set up our own systems to track this stuff and to catalog this stuff they have not heard from anyone so far in the.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
U.S. well, you mentioned that folks drew comparisons to international war crimes documentation efforts in places like Ukraine, Syria, Gaza. What lessons from those contexts apply here? What's different also about documenting federal law enforcement in the U.S. i think the.
Chris Mills
Biggest lesson is that it's quite difficult to catalog when there is this much going on. Just today, tragically, an ICE agent killed another person in Minneapolis. These are not at the level of someone killing someone, but like there are infringements every day and multiple people filming them. So what you end up having is just tons and tons of videos. And when it comes to pursuing legal accountability, having a ton of videos is not that useful if you haven't correctly applied metadata tags to them, if you haven't been able to prove where the videos come from. Especially when you consider like the increase in AI generated videos. A big lesson I think to take from international war crime documentation efforts is just you have to be extremely careful with the videos that you do have to make sure that they're correctly labeled and the provenance is proven of them. I think one obvious way that it's different is that this is federal law enforcement, right? So when it comes to like legal challenges, I think it's going to be quite interesting to see how states end up trying to pursue legal accountability, like what agencies they end up going after. Whether they're going after individual agents or, you know, higher level operatives that are setting rules of engagement, that remains an open question. And I don't want to speculate too much.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
So, you know, you mentioned chain of custody issues. Maybe also talk a little bit about some of the concerns around potentially, you know, even platform takedowns, which has been an issue in war crimes documentation. But you know, in the war crimes context, you know, there's a lot of thinking that's gone into that, including, you know, a lot of thinking about the correct protocol for the collection of evidence, the preservation of evidence. Are there things to learn here for these state level efforts to collect this information?
Chris Mills
Definitely, yeah. I mean, as you say, chain of custody, very important. It's especially difficult, I think, with these portals that are being set up by state and local officials because you know, what, how are they able to prove that the person that sends in the video is the person that originally took the video? That's difficult to do. That requires, you know, probably speaking with the person. That probably requires getting like information directly from their devices. And you know, it's unclear whether these efforts that as I kind of mentioned earlier, seem to be sprouting up in response to things, not more of like a forward thinking cataloging effort, whether they have that expertise. The platform question is very interesting. So this is more on the open source side rather than the user submitted evidence side. We have seen social media platforms comply with requests from the DHS to take down. For example, in the case of Facebook groups that people were using to report ICE sightings in the Chicago area, we've also had Apple take down apps that were designed for similar functions where users would be able to flag enforcement opportunities so that their community members would avoid going there. And we've also seen DHS pursue some more aggressive subpoenas. We've had examples of the DHS subpoenaing accounts to try to get user information about Instagram accounts that were doing similar efforts to track and to identify when, when ICE is appearing in neighborhoods. So you have these platforms complying with government requests. And also in just in general, you have these platforms that have over the years, kind of maybe sighed away a little bit from their focus on, you know, user privacy and safety, more toward being willing to comply with, with governments if it means that they're able to, you know, have their way.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
Given all the challenges you've identified, are you optimistic any of this documentation will lead to accountability? Or are we really looking at here creating a public record that there's a more, perhaps immediate use to the collection of this evidence in the war for public opinion?
Chris Mills
Definitely there's a more short term, just like being able to counter narratives from the administration about what's going on on the ground. I mean, we saw this with the killing of Renee Goode where the administration pretty much immediately puts the blame on her. But the videos that we have that people were uploading to social media or sharing with news stations makes it quite clear what actually happened. I have more confidence in open source efforts that are being led by organizations like Bellingcat that have a lot of experience in handling this kind of data and then being able to present it in a way that is useful in court. These local, state level efforts, it really does remain to be seen. But just the nature of how they're put together and how responsive they were to instances of ICE raids rather than a sort of more thought out, broad strategy does give me a little bit of pause.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
This was an in your piece, but something I thought I might just ask about. I mean, it's been, you know, interesting to see the extent to which residents certainly in both Chicago and now, Minneapolis in particular, have organized. And there's a lot of talk of how quickly these groups have come together. A lot of that activity taking place over encrypted apps like Signal. Any angle on that just in terms of what you're observing in terms of kind of citizen coordination, communications?
Chris Mills
Yeah, I guess I would push back A little bit on the idea that they came together quickly. Minneapolis is one of the most well organized cities when it comes to ICE Watch. And you know, a lot of these groups and processes and strategies that they're using to track where ICE is, to notify their neighbors, to identify vehicles, are things that they developed during the summer of Black Lives Matter protests. And that these organizations, these community level groups that stuck together very strongly have been, you know, practicing essentially like figuring out how to do this because kind of tracking all along. And yeah, it is, it is very interesting because they are, as you said, these groups in Minneapolis. You know, we're seeing some of these groups in Maine as well, kind of preparing themselves for what is expected to be another ICE raid there. They are relying on these encrypted platforms and using them in, I think, kind of ingenious ways. Like in Minneapolis, in each community or each, you know, community that they've set a couple block radius, they're just having live phone calls running all day that people can use to alert and then they're having people that are listening to these calls all day and then filing these alerts in their system. It's actually really quite complex for just community organizers.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
Just a final question for you. What will you be watching in the next couple of weeks? And you know, particularly as this current situation in Minneapolis, which as you mentioned, you know, appears to be reaching another inflection point as that continues.
Chris Mills
Yeah, I mean, I personally am just watching to see how communities react. I think what we've seen in Minneapolis is incredible. The day of action yesterday, being able to get all these businesses to close down in solidarity is great, but really what was powering it was just incredible turnout in sub zero temperatures. Tens of thousands of people coming into the street and not just rallying and marching, but also getting engaged in their local networks and being very vigilant about ice. I am watching where I live in New York City, the formations that have developed over the last year, plus are local ICE Watch networks, tenant unions and worker unions that are all already having discussions about how to act if there is a surge of ICE officers here. So I'm just very curious to see whether the model in Minnesota has been incredibly successful at keeping people safe, you know, people keeping other people safe, whether that's replicable elsewhere.
Podcast Host / Interviewer
Chris Mills, Rodrigo, thank you very much.
Chris Mills
Thanks so much for having me.
Justin Hendricks
That's it for this episode. I hope you'll send your feedback. Could write to me at Justin at TechPolicy Press. Thanks to my guest. Thanks to my co founder Brian Jones. And thank you for listening.
Tech Policy Press Announcer
Tech policy press.
Title: Documenting Terror on the Streets of Minneapolis
Podcast: The Tech Policy Press Podcast
Air Date: January 25, 2026
Main Theme:
This episode investigates the death of Minneapolis resident Alex Preddy at the hands of federal Border Patrol agents amid intensified ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) raids in President Trump’s second term. Host Justin Hendricks, joined by journalist and editor Chris Mills Rodrigo, delves into the emerging patterns of violence, the pivotal role of citizen video documentation, the legal and organizational challenges of collecting and preserving such evidence, and the dynamic responses from local communities and officials.
"What I've seen here is what I've seen [in Yemen, Haiti, Syria, Iraq and Ukraine]. A powerful entity violently and intentionally terrorizing people, making them afraid to go outside... This has a lasting generational impact." ([02:40])
Chris Mills Rodrigo (Inequality.org, Tech Policy Press Fellow):
“These videos are very successful in kind of countering the administration narrative... but so far... have largely just been about changing narratives and not so much about... legal accountability.” ([05:43])
On Retaliation:
“ICE agents are reacting quite aggressively... not just a case of individual officers... but actually comes from the very top.” ([06:53])
"They are doing this because you're filming us, and we don't like that you're filming us." ([07:59])
On Legal Framing by Officials:
"Kristi Noem saying that filming ICE officers... is doxing and could even amount to violence." ([06:53])
"What you end up having is just tons and tons of videos. And when it comes to pursuing legal accountability, having a ton of videos is not that useful if you haven't correctly applied metadata tags... if you haven't been able to prove where the videos come from." ([11:22]) "We have seen social media platforms comply with requests from DHS to take down... Facebook groups... Apple take down apps... DHS pursue some more aggressive subpoenas..." ([13:11])
"Minneapolis is one of the most well organized cities when it comes to ICE Watch... these community level groups... have been practicing... since Black Lives Matter protests." ([16:54])
"In each community... they're just having live phone calls running all day that people can use to alert... it's actually really quite complex for just community organizers." ([16:54])
"Definitely there's a more short term... being able to counter narratives from the administration about what's going on... videos that... people were uploading... makes it quite clear what actually happened." ([15:23]) "Just the nature of how [local, state level efforts] are put together... gives me a little bit of pause." ([15:23]) "Whether the model in Minnesota... keeping people safe, whether that's replicable elsewhere." ([18:28])
The episode is sober, serious, and urgent, conveying the gravity of federal violence paired with admiration for grassroots resistance and critical scrutiny of legal, technological, and organizational challenges.
Summary prepared by Podcast Summarizer AI