The Tony Kinnett Cast – Episode 451 Detailed Summary
Theme Overview:
This episode takes aim at two major news stories: the Republican failure to censure Rep. Stacy Plaskett for her ties to Jeffrey Epstein, and explosive investigative reporting about $100 million in corruption in Ukraine – implicating the Zelensky administration. The show blends sharp political commentary, inside baseball on Congressional dealings, and deep-dive journalism with guests Elizabeth Mitchell (White House correspondent) and Steve Cortez (Ukraine corruption investigator).
1. The Republican “Flop” on Censuring Epstein-Collaborator (Stacy Plaskett)
Background:
- Host Tony Kinnett opens by expressing exasperation over the Republican Party’s inability to secure a censure against Rep. Stacy Plaskett (US Virgin Islands, non-voting member), who was caught coordinating with Jeffrey Epstein—even after his conviction as a child sex offender.
- Kinnett’s Take: This should have been, in his words, “low-hanging fruit, walk in the park easy. How do they possibly mess that up?” (03:15)
Key Points and Quotes
A. The Plaskett-Epstein Connection:
-
Plaskett sent and received texts with Epstein in 2019, taking direct instructions for committee hearings and attacks on Trump.
-
Kinnett plays revelatory clips of Plaskett attempting to downplay the relationship:
- Plaskett on House floor:
“At the time [Epstein] was my constituent, who was not public knowledge at that time that he was under federal investigation.” – [04:42]
- Kinnett’s reaction:
“Aren’t you a member of the freaking Oversight and Judiciary Committee? ... Maybe if you’re buds with the other squad members ... you might let someone know ...” – [05:00]
- Plaskett on House floor:
-
Plaskett on CNN:
- “Having a friendship with him is not something that I would deem to have. And so I’m just looking forward. I’m moving forward.” [05:45]
-
Kinnett mocks this evasiveness:
“He told her to stop chewing. … Goodness gracious.” – [06:03]
B. Republican Opportunity Fumbled:
- Kinnett’s rationale: The Republicans had a “free shot” to take political advantage of Democratic mismanagement (Plaskett’s Epstein collaboration), but failed to deliver.
- Attorney General Pam Bondi’s previous mishandling of the Epstein files is mentioned as context for Republican frustration and lost momentum.
C. How The Censure Got Killed: The Backroom Deal
- Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (FL) challenges House procedure:
- “Why [are] leadership on both sides... cutting back end deals to cover up public corruption in the House of Representatives from both Republican and Democrat members?” – [12:28]
- Kinnett’s commentary:
“Some people had some backroom conversations … and it looks like the votes are changing. May I ask, my good friend, what in the heck is happening?” – [12:55]
D. Rep. Tim Burchett (TN) Explains the Deal:
- “The disgusting thing ... was four Republicans chose not to vote. Three Republicans voted present. And three Republicans voted no. So it failed. And what they did was they cut a deal ... on another ethics vote on a Republican ... [to protect] people on there who are chairman of committees ... It’s bogus, and it stinks.” – [13:38]
E. Who Was the Deal For?
The Case of Rep. Corey Mills (FL):
-
Mills is the subject of multiple allegations: confirmed sextortion, alleged stolen valor, unpaid debts, harassment, and more.
-
Kinnett:
“There’s too many stories … Corey Mills is a scumbag of a human being. … All of this free political capital … traded it all away on a censure vote. Why? For one of the scummiest Republicans currently sitting in Congress, a grifter of grifters.” – [17:00-20:04]
-
Rep. Nancy Mace (SC) introduces a resolution to censure Mills:
“Now Therefore, be it resolved that Representative Corey Mills be censured … and is hereby removed from the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House.” – [22:21]
F. Democratic Fumbles, Too
- Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY, Minority Leader):
- Offers a vague, evasive defense, justifying bipartisan defeat of the Plaskett censure:
“…The resolution that was introduced targeting Stacy Plaskett was defeated ... in a bipartisan way. … including the fact that it was a dramatic overreach.” – [23:40]
- Kinnett: “He doesn’t even understand. … Well done. Way to go. Stellar stuff. Now the momentum’s gone.” – [24:17]
- Offers a vague, evasive defense, justifying bipartisan defeat of the Plaskett censure:
G. Congressional Sound and Fury:
- Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) derails the discussion by confusing other donors named Jeffrey Epstein (not the Epstein), leading to Kinnett’s sarcastic monologue mocking her misunderstanding and tone. [25:03–27:09]
- Kinnett’s summary:
“How you somehow fumble political capital … is beyond me.” – [27:33]
2. H1B Visas and MAGA Discord: White House Insider Analysis
Guest: Elizabeth Mitchell (White House correspondent)
A. Internal Trump Administration Divide:
- After Trump’s remarks on wanting more H1B visa talent, MAGA base angered—sees as undermining American workers.
- Two factions in the administration:
- Those wanting to eliminate H1Bs.
- Those favoring reform but continued access to top foreign talent.
- Both sides agree abuse of H1B is rampant; the “how” of reform is disputed. [29:32–30:31]
- Trump is being pulled by “tech people” (e.g., Elon Musk), who praise H1Bs, and “America First” hardliners (e.g., Marjorie Taylor Greene) who oppose them. [31:24]
- Notable Crossover: Left-wingers like Bernie Sanders align with America Firsters in opposition to H1Bs. [33:00]
B. Policy Uncertainty:
- Trump is responsive to polls and base reaction; his final position unclear.
- Mitchell:
“The President is definitely saying, being pro-H1B, he really likes them. … But there is disagreement within his administration...” – [33:59]
C. Reform Focus:
- J.D. Vance, seen as staunchly pro-Trump, attempts to “bridge” between needing limited, top-tier H1Bs and prioritizing American jobs. [34:59]
- Mitchell:
“Sometimes we’re going to need H1Bs … but we want very few of those people, only the very best.” – [34:59]
3. $100 Million Stolen in Ukraine: Operation Midas Exposé with Steve Cortez
Guest: Steve Cortez (Investigative Journalist, cortezinvestigates.com)
A. Massive Corruption Detailed
- $100 million stolen from the Ukrainian treasury in the so-called “Operation Midas” scandal. Evidence includes a literal gold toilet.
- Ringleader: Timur Mindich—very close confidante of President Zelensky (godfathers to each other’s children), part of a “very corrupt cabal that ... runs that country and steals from their own people.”
- Funds fleeced from Department of Energy; used for luxury developments (“Dynasty” housing). [36:18–37:10]
- When Ukrainian National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) tried to investigate, Zelensky used his security (SBU) to raid NABU and arrest lead detective Razoloff under bogus Russia-collusion charges. [40:34–43:20]
- Mindich remains at large in Israel, while honest investigators languish in jail.
Key Quote:
“The scumbag thief Mindich is sitting living in luxury right now in Israel, and the honest cop who was investigating him is sitting in a prison in Ukraine. That’s pretty upside down, I’d say.” – Steve Cortez, [43:20]
B. Context: Why U.S. Should Care
- U.S. aid to Ukraine is “hundreds of billions” of borrowed dollars; with the perpetrators in power, expects theft to continue.
- Cortez makes clear: Criticizing Zelensky does NOT mean supporting Putin; demand accountability from U.S. allies. [44:34]
- Ukrainian citizens suffering: harsh winter, energy shortages, loss of life and livelihood, “villages with no men left”. [44:34–45:00]
Key Quote:
“We cannot have a long-term partnership with a leader who we clearly cannot trust. In Zelensky. ... [He is] thoroughly and systemically corrupt.” – Steve Cortez, [39:45]
C. Peace Deal Negotiation & Political Impact
- Financial Times and Axios report U.S.-Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations; potentially involves Ukraine ceding more territory to Russia in exchange for U.S. security guarantees (a “Marshall Plan” of sorts). [49:24–52:51]
- Cortez’s sources mostly confirm the reporting, noting that Zelensky’s “maximalist” stance is now crumbling because of the scandal’s exposure:
- “Zelensky has mostly in these negotiations taken a very maximalist approach ... But now that he’s in a very, very weak political position at home ... he is not in a position to take that maximalist approach.” – Steve Cortez, [53:05]
- Kinnett suggests the corruption scandal may force Zelensky to accept a peace deal he previously resisted.
- Zelensky postponing elections is criticized; Cortez demands U.S. use leverage to insist on democratic accountability. [47:35]
Comic Relief:
- Corrupt cabal enforces a “Dynasty” development (after the TV show), has fixers named “Sugar Man” and “Che Guevara.” [49:04]
4. Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- Tony Kinnett: “All of this free political capital ... traded it all away on a censure vote. Why? For one of the scummiest Republicans currently sitting in Congress, a grifter of grifters.” [20:04]
- Tim Burchett (R-TN): “It’s bogus, and it stinks. ... First opportunity I get to speak to our leadership, I will give them a piece of my mind ... they’re the most sewer-dwelling people ... some of these folks.” [13:38]
- Elizabeth Mitchell: “The one thing that unites both those factions is everyone knows there are way too many abuses of H1B visas.” [29:32]
- Steve Cortez: “We now have the evidence from within [Ukraine] ... just how vast and pernicious this corruption is.” [39:45]
- Steve Cortez: “The scumbag thief Mindich is sitting living in luxury right now in Israel, and the honest cop who was investigating him is sitting in a prison in Ukraine. That’s pretty upside down, I’d say.” [43:20]
- Tony Kinnett (sarcastically on Democratic evasions): “Well done. Way to go. Stellar stuff. Now the momentum's gone. You proud of yourselves? Morons.” [24:17]
5. Key Timestamps by Segment
- Opening Rant / Plaskett-Epstein Recap: 00:42–08:32
- Republican Censure Failure & Deal-Making: 08:33–15:43
- The Corey Mills Factor: 15:43–23:20
- Democratic Missteps (Jeffries, Crockett): 23:20–27:33
- H1B Visa Internal GOP Fight (Elizabeth Mitchell): 29:32–35:43
- Ukraine $100M Corruption Scandal (Steve Cortez): 36:02–55:33
Conclusion & Tone
- Style: Combative, sardonic, with moments of detailed investigative insight.
- Overall Message: Both parties are complicit in protecting their own at the expense of accountability; U.S. policy (immigration and foreign aid) is hamstrung by incompetence and cronyism. Only transparency, investigative journalism, and public pressure can change entrenched dysfunction.
End Note:
The episode concludes with Kinnett and Cortez promising follow-up investigations into youth political shifts and more on Ukraine, highlighting the show’s ongoing commitment to exposing corruption and horse-trading on both sides of the aisle.
