Let’s continue…

This is the second report analyzing the fresh narrative that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are ushering us into a techno-dystopian hell, per a plan that was mapped out by the “Hidden Philosopher” Curtis Yarvin, wherein the “tech elite” gain total control.

In yesterday’s report, I outlined how solid truths are being woven together with a series of false premises to present the seemingly thorough and somewhat plausible conclusion that Trump is the “perfect pawn” for this unprecedented power grab.

Along with many not-so-obvious hints and socialist tells, the author misdirects attention by attributing the implementation of this evil plan to none other than Elon Musk and the DOGE team that is currently rocking Washington DC:

“The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) serves as the vehicle for this transformation. Under Elon Musk's direction, what's presented as modernization reveals itself as RAGE in action.…As Yarvin himself expressed it: ‘To install a new operating system, you must first shut down the old one. RAGE is ctrl-alt-delete for the state.’”

I smell a rat.

Isn’t it ironic how this new narrative just so happened to crop up right as DOGE began to expose massive Deep State fraud and cut off funding to the myriad apparatus that have long been used to bolster and enrich globalist hegemony?

Given the complexity and timing of the propaganda, I strongly suspect the author is an asset of one or more of the groups most threatened by these developments.

As I pointed out, by demonizing the “tech elite”—specifically Elon Musk and any of the tech bros who supported Trump and Vance in the 2024 election—the author is directing attention away from the real global power players, say like the UN, WEF, WHO, IMF, World Bank, Bilderberg, Davos, Rothchilds, Soros, and so on.

The question that comes to mind is: who’s using who?

Do you think a handful of “tech elites” are using the long-established and deeply entrenched global power players to advance a fascist corporate state?

Or, do you think the “secret cabal” of global elites are using the Silicon Valley billionaires and the fancy new tech to advance their plans for a New World Order?

Logically speaking, which is more likely?

In analyzing the narrative, the language used, the thinly veiled political slant, and the sophistication of the writing, it is my opinion that the perspective being presented is an intentional psyop. That is, I believe the thoughts that are being introduced are targeting critical thinkers in the liberty movement, with the intent of destabilizing support for DOGE and stirring up doubt and dissention in the ranks.

The source material for the following discussion can be found in this pair of articles, written by Erik Wikstrom:

* Checkmate: The Triumph of Technocracy — How Trump, Elon & the Tech Elite are paving the way for a Brave New World - And what it means for all of us

* The Triumph of Technocracy | Part 2: The Ultimate Deception — How the Pandemic Sorted, Profiled, and Set Up the Resistance for the Perfect Trap

** My original analysis of those articles is found here:

Today, I’d like to start out by emphasizing Wikstrom’s obvious political slant. Though it may not be obvious to many at the outset, given his expert use of common MAGA parlance to build rapport and disarm readers, there are many clues dribbled throughout his writing. Several of these tells were brought to light yesterday.

When every “bad actor” just so happens to support the MAGA movement, it raises the suspicion that the author is failing to conceal his bias. He pretends to be on the same team, but his words paint a different picture.

Consider what he has to say about JD Vance:

“JD Vance represents a particularly sophisticated placement. With his strong connection to Peter Thiel [a tech bro who supported Trump], working-class background and Yale education, he moves seamlessly between worlds.

When he speaks of "reforming bureaucracy," he uses language that sounds harmless to most but signals a darker agenda to initiates.”

Have you ever listened to JD Vance?

His language sounds harmless, but I bet you didn’t know his straight forward words and folksy tone are actually the signal of a much darker agenda, at least “to initiates.”

But who the hell are these supposed initiates, anyway?

I’d suggest these “initiates” are none other than the people who read the Wikstrom articles and accept what he says. The initiates are those whom accept this new narrative, who’s critical minds are incapable of identifying and rejecting the memes—quite likely military grade memes, by the way—and thus, their minds become infected with this new way of thinking.

This is memetic warfare.

As a result, these initiates then propagate this narrative. They share the articles, which disseminate the germinating thoughts, and spread the infectious ideas through casual conversation. They’ve bought into the belief, and the belief then begins to drive their behavior, specifically by stirring up emotion in opposition to Trump, Musk, and DOGE—all because they’ve received a new “quantum of information” that has been presented as a secret key to seeing things “as they really are.”

Again, this is like catnip for the conspiratorial mind.

Further pushing the assertion that Trump, Musk, and DOGE are trying to facilitate the “ultimate power grab” in their fascist pursuit of “total control over society’s future development,” Wikstrom says the following:

“Unlike traditional authoritarian transformations that moved slowly to avoid resistance, this operation shows no such caution. …

While media focuses on political drama, the real transformation proceeds:

* State functions transfer to private control

* Democratic processes yield to automation

* New control systems install piece by piece…

Each implemented change creates dependencies that make reversal increasingly difficult:

* Digital payment systems replace traditional banking

* Corporate platforms supersede government communications

* Private infrastructure displaces public services

* AI systems become essential for basic functions

By the time the transformation becomes obvious, the new system will be too deeply embedded to easily dislodge.”

Again, we see both truth and false premise being interlaced, and again we see the author’s political bias in the underlying sentiment. The easiest way to identify the pattern in his sentiment is to view it through the lens of good and bad. What’s being presented as good? What’s being presented as bad? What’s this guy saying?

We are being told that what’s happening right now is an “authoritarian transformation.” You see, it’s not that Trump was elected to Make America Great Again. It’s not that he’s working with Musk to hack through decades of corruption and expose the massive fraud and decades of egregious spending and public fleecing.

What we are actually witnessing, if one were to accept this new narrative, is a carefully orchestrated, exceedingly complex, perfectly timed, highly advanced strategy for the “tech elites” to take total control over society.

That’s the narrative—that’s what this guy is saying.

But take a step back. Notice how, upon hearing that narrative, the mind gets caught up in considering whether or not this could possibly be true. It’s at least possible, isn’t it? I mean, a lot of what this guy has to say is spot on—he even talks about the Hegelian dialectic and the New World Order!

And yeah, sure, a lot of these “tech elite” billionaires are clearly just trying to get more money and power, being the greedy capitalist pigs that they are. It’s not that much of a stretch to think they might be trying to make a move to advance a new sort of “corporate state” so they can have their fascist way with America.

It’s all quite plausible.

But don’t take your eyes off the ball here. Retrace the thoughts. Where did this thought come from? What is the premise of this thought? The thought was suggested by this new article that came out, and the premise is that Trump and Musk are driving this authoritarian train—and don’t forget about JD Vance and his dark and sinister agenda!

BUT… wait a minute… what the hell did that guy just say?!

Wikstrom said that this “authoritarian transformation” looks like State functions transferring to private control; Corporate platforms superseding government communications; Private infrastructure displacing public services.

Think it through.

State control is good, private control is bad. Government controlling public communications is good, private platforms facilitating communication is bad. Being dependent upon the State to provide public services is good, but providing private sector solutions is bad.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this the exact opposite of actual reality?

You...