← The Town with Matthew Belloni
Loading summary
Transcript95 lines
- [00:00]
Amy Poehler
Hi everyone, it's Amy Poehler and I'm launching a new podcast called Good Hang. In preparation for that, I asked some of my friends to send in some videos and give me some advice.
- [00:11]
Matt Bellany
Just be yourself and the guests will come.
- [00:13]
Stephen Cahall
Don't be the celebrity that this is their like sixth thing they're doing.
- [00:16]
Amy Poehler
I love true crime and cooking podcasts.
- [00:19]
Matt Bellany
Is there any way you could combine the two?
- [00:22]
Amy Poehler
Well, everyone has an opinion and a podcast, so join me for Good Hang. It's rough out there. We're just trying to lighten it up a little bit.
- [00:31]
Matt Bellany
This episode of the Town is presented by Max. For your consideration. Max presents the HBO original Mountainhead from the creator of Succession. Mountainhead stars Steve Carell, Jason Schwartzman, Cory Michael Smith and Ramy Youssef as four rival tech billionaires gather for their annual mountain retreat. But when one of their AI platforms sparks a global crisis, their boys weekend spirals into chaos. The future of humanity may be a game to them, but but billions of lives are on the table. Emmy eligible for outstanding Television Movie and all other categories now streaming on Max the Town is supported by FX's say Nothing, now nominated for four BAFTA TV awards. Based on the book by Patrick Radden Keefe, the Peabody Award nominee is a story of murder and memory in Northern Ireland during the troubles. Following Dolores and Marion Price, it explores the extremes some people will go to in the name of their beliefs and and how a deeply divided society can suddenly tip over into armed conflict. Time calls say Nothing exceptional, an urgently timely work of political art. All episodes streaming on Hulu. It is Wednesday, June 25th. I'm old enough to remember, way back in 2017, the shockwaves that spread around town when Netflix announced that it had signed Shonda Rhimes to a massive overall deal. Shonda, of course, had created Grey's Anatomy and other hit shows for abc, and it was seen as an inflection point where Netflix, once considered the scrappy kid playing in the Hollywood sandbox, fully grew up and started running the whole playground. Similar huge creator deals follow with Ryan Murphy, Kenya Barris, the Game of Thrones guys, many, many more. And now, eight years later, Netflix is the clear winner of the global streaming Wars. Except for YouTube. A different business, of course. Netflix is premium subscription. YouTube is mostly free and user generated, but they both sell advertising and they both spend tens of billions of dollars on content, and both are trying to be the hub for all viewing worldwide. Netflix certainly sees YouTube as one of its biggest competitors for engagement, that magic word that increasingly defines success in streaming in the most recent Nielsen gauge assessment for May, YouTube generated 12.5% of all viewership on streaming TVs, far outpacing Netflix at 7.5%. And that's just on TVs, not mobile, and only in the U.S. and for as much success as Netflix has had since that great correction in 2022, its engagement growth has been slowing recently as YouTube continues to pull away. So what should Netflix do about that? One analyst recently suggested that Netflix should whip out that 2017 playbook and start treating YouTube talent like the ABC creators. Meaning throw money at its top creators, bringing them over to Netflix on exclusive contracts, populate the service with content that has already proven to be wildly popular. Sounds smart, right? After all, Netflix has already shown there's an audience on the service for YouTubers like Ms. Rachel and Cocomelon. Mr. Beast's show on Prime Video does well. So why isn't Netflix already trying to make these creators exclusive to Netflix? I have some thoughts. So I asked that analyst Stephen Cahill of Wells Fargo to come on the show to discuss it with me today. Is Netflix YouTube problem and should they be throwing money at top creators from the Ringer and Puck? I'm Matt Bellany and this is the town. All right. We are here with Stephen Cahal, who is the managing director and senior analyst of media and Cable Equity research at Wells Fargo. Welcome back, returning champion.
- [04:01]
Amy Poehler
Yeah, thank you for having me on again.
- [04:03]
Matt Bellany
Out of all the media analysts, the brains behind the analyst reports that I read on a daily basis. You have the most tattoos, right?
- [04:14]
Amy Poehler
I think that's true. I haven't confirmed that, but I'm pretty sure I don't know.
- [04:18]
Matt Bellany
Michael Nathanson, I think has some sleeves that we just don't know about.
- [04:22]
Amy Poehler
You never know. You never know. But yes.
- [04:25]
Matt Bellany
All right, well, welcome back. Thanks for coming on the show. You wrote a pretty interesting note to your clients last week that I wrote about in my Puck newsletter and I wanted to have you on to discuss. And the thesis, as I understand it, and we'll get into it, is essentially that Netflix has a big opportunity here to go after short form content and essentially could really benefit from pillaging YouTube just doing what they did to the broadcast networks seven, eight years ago to YouTube and TikTok and identify the top 10 creators and just throw money at them, bring them over to the Netflix platform. Am I getting that right?
- [05:11]
Amy Poehler
Mostly. In fact, the only bit I would disagree with is while I think Netflix is focused on YouTube, given how big and broad its engagement is, and focused on the creator community as a piece of that.
- [05:23]
Matt Bellany
So not TikTok.
- [05:24]
Amy Poehler
I don't think so much TikTok. I just, you know, as, as you put in your newsletter or something. We wrote not everything that works on YouTube is going to work on Netflix and definitely not, not most of what's on TikTok is going to work on Netflix. But there are these really high content value creators that, that maybe could be in, in either spot. The only bit of what you said that I disagree with is I don't think it would even at its greatest scope, be the same sort of pillage because YouTube's viewership and content base is just so massive. If you add up all the top creators on YouTube, there's still like a pebble on the beach of YouTube's engagement.
- [06:00]
Matt Bellany
Right? It wouldn't hurt as much is what you're saying. There's just so much tonnage on YouTube that picking off the equivalent of the Shonda Rhimes or Ryan Murphy or Kenya Barris. While it was pretty devastating for Disney, ABC at the time, this would not be as devastating for YouTube if, if it hurt it at all.
- [06:18]
Amy Poehler
I think that's right, because one of the questions we received since the report is, you know, is this kind of poking the bear and starting an arms race, you know, much like we saw during, you know, those, those so called streaming wars and, and does Netflix want to engage that with YouTube? But you know, I think there's been some analysis of YouTube's engagement and it really is, you know, the long tail in every sort of infinite direction of content. You know, whether it's home repair or car maintenance or creator community or a million other things I'm not mentioning. So these, these big creators do represent, I think, a much smaller piece of that puzzle.
- [06:51]
Matt Bellany
Yeah. And we've had Neil Mohan on the show and he's not a programmer. I mean, he will admit that right away. He's, you know, we are an open tent. We want to be the partner for the creators. We are not curating, we are just putting stuff on the platform and then what performs. What performs. That's sort of the basis for this like quasi feud between Netflix and YouTube where Ted Sarandos calls it killing time and he says Netflix is spending time. And Neil Mohan, when we had him on the show, basically responded like, the audience decides. We don't decide how you spend your time, the audience does. And if you look at the cost for the Netflix content, according to your report, you guys estimated that in 2024, Netflix had 188 billion hours of viewing time and they spent about 15 billion in content spend.
- [07:42]
Amy Poehler
Yep, that's right.
- [07:43]
Matt Bellany
So that would translate to $81 per 1,000 hours of viewing. If you look at YouTube, you guys estimated that their cost is about $60 per 1,000 hours of content. So that is a $21 discount if you go after creators, then if you split spend on the traditional programmers that Netflix has spent on.
- [08:11]
Amy Poehler
Yes, and I think one of the things you find with Netflix is because it is, you know, a broad array of content and I think this is something they would, they would confirm is they have really expensive content. And those are all the things that, that we talk about and that you see at the top of the engagement report, you know, Bridgerton, the Electric State, Russo Brothers, et cetera. You know, they also have a lot of documentaries which are really, really cheap per hour.
- [08:37]
Matt Bellany
Oh, I watched the poop cruise thing last night. It's, it's very disparate and they get a lot of bang for their buck out of this cheaper documentary style content. And if you look at the top 10, they're on there almost every week now.
- [08:51]
Amy Poehler
And so the point, right, is that it's a portfolio. The library, the cheap stuff, the super expensive, you know, shots that they take. And so they're always looking at the portfolio. And you know, a question that they're now getting, as you know, in spades is what, what is sports going to mean for Netflix? And no matter what analysis you do of any sports rights, you will come down to the conclusion that per hour of engagement it is extremely expensive. Now that doesn't mean it's not good value, that doesn't mean it's not strategic or important. But you know, an hour of Monday Night Football is egregiously expensive compared to just about anything else anyone will, will ever watch. So if you, if you assume that Netflix is going to pursue some really expensive content to be additive to the.
- [09:33]
Matt Bellany
Portfolio, they have to be there. If they want to be a diversified, everything for everyone service, they have to have some of that.
- [09:42]
Amy Poehler
That's right. And what YouTube offers them is really high value content built in audience, probably more skewing to the ad supported side at reasonably priced content costs, even if they're doing sort of big deals with prominent creators. So the money ball to it to me looks like it works pretty well.
- [10:02]
Matt Bellany
Yeah, it's the workhorse stuff. It's the stuff that they don't put out there as the premium Netflix content, but it does the job. It's a middle, it's the equivalent in baseball of A middle reliever. It will just eat up innings, it will just eat up hours and get people to stay on the platform. And if Netflix really is competing with YouTube for domination of the streaming wars, which increasingly it does look like a two horse race, this makes a lot of sense to get into this business in a way that makes sense for Netflix. So I want to talk about that. How would YouTube creators on Netflix need to be different in order to keep the Netflix brand? Because this is a branding issue. Netflix is premium. YouTube is user generated and not premium. How would YouTube on Netflix work?
- [10:53]
Amy Poehler
Yeah, so I think one thing that you're increasingly seeing with a lot of streaming platforms is this idea of hubs for discovery. I think the place that probably you and I have talked about it the most is where Disney is going. They have kids and family, they have FX and Hulu, they have sports. And there is some segmentation within the apps to go discover that, you know, Netflix is going through, I think, a user interface update and innovation as we speak. And I think one of the things that they think about is discovery. So we all hear about shows which we go seek out, but if you're not sure what you want to watch, you know, how do you discover content?
- [11:31]
Matt Bellany
And they've resisted that. I've said for years that they should put a denotation on certain types of content to say to the audience, this is quality, this is award worthy, this is fun for a night out. Disney has that segmentation based on its brands that it owns. Netflix is one brand for the most part. And yes, they direct you to certain types of content via descriptors, but they don't have hubs on the interface like Disney does. And I say, I think what you're saying is maybe there's a separate tab for short form or for the cream of the crop creators or something that denotes this is YouTube style content, but in a Netflix branded environment.
- [12:18]
Amy Poehler
Yeah, and so that's what I'm saying is I do think that that's going to change. So for instance, video games is a different type of engagement and it does occupy a slightly different place in the user interface. Sports. And the more they get into live is certainly going to as well. And they've indicated that they're heading into live. And so short form is a natural, another version of that which can be recommended or can sit with a slight amount of segmentation. I mean, even the Criterion Collection, which I'm a fan of, you know, has a hub right now for Chinese film noir. So you can take, right your, your library Your vast resources and just sort of direct people. Hey, if you're looking for this type of thing, you know, here it is. As long as you've got enough titles under, under each area, right?
- [13:03]
Matt Bellany
And it could be a, a place that brings in an entirely new cohort of audience, people that are not interested in YouTube. If my kid has no attention span and doesn't watch shows, quote unquote, maybe he becomes a Netflix devotee because of this short form stuff.
- [13:21]
Amy Poehler
It's certainly an interesting thing to test right now. I've used YouTube for a lot of car repair videos. I don't think those belong on Netflix. I don't think those, I don't think Netflix thinks those things belong on Netflix. But you know, Mr. Beast and Ms. Rachel have shows on Amazon and Netflix respectively. So there is clearly some overlap.
- [13:40]
Matt Bellany
Non exclusive though. And that gets to the, the question of why would these top creators do this? I mean, when Neil was on the show, he pointed out that yes, Mr. Beast has an Amazon show, but in an interviews he always says, YouTube first, YouTube first. The business is built on YouTube and his entire enterprise with the Chocolate Factory and all the other things he sells are YouTube businesses. So other than just gobs of money, why would these top creators come over to Netflix and give that up? Because I do think it would need to probably be exclusive if they wanted to make a splash here.
- [14:18]
Amy Poehler
I agree. And certainly, you know, Netflix's entire history is exclusivity, global exclusivity, typically, including in many cases, I think, as it relates to YouTube creators library exclusivities. But if we think about what they may do in the future, I think it would be looking at bringing creators over on a as exclusive as possible basis. So first is gobs of money does make a difference. But if you put it in the context of Netflix's $17 billion of cash content spend, if they put $1 billion to work towards these type of creators, that's finding the biggest ones and paying them huge premiums to what they pay today. It gives those creators a business model in which they're a little less reliant on the advertising market. So de risk them a little bit, gives them a little bit of creative appetite to maybe think broader about what they're doing. So I imagine that for some of those creators that is very attractive. And then the last thing I think that is super important is that for the most part they're not giving up reach. If you think about the penetration of Netflix in the markets where most of.
- [15:20]
Matt Bellany
These creators operate, it's 300 million households worldwide and counting.
- [15:25]
Amy Poehler
Yep. I imagine that Venn diagram of people who use YouTube and people who have Netflix is pretty close to a full circle in a lot of developed markets.
- [15:33]
Matt Bellany
But it's not free. There is a barrier to watching and you know Netflix does not have a fast service, at least not yet. Maybe they will at some point, but the ad tier is pretty cheap. But it's not free.
- [15:44]
Amy Poehler
That's right. Though again, you know, YouTube on television is 10 plus percent share of TV time 12.5 now. Yep, that's right. Netflix is 8. Right. And if you then think about what that implies for how many YouTube users on television there are in the U.S. again, the penetration rate, it's probably higher than Netflix's, but it's not meaningfully higher. And if that's a proxy for some of the developed global market, a lot of these creators audiences already pay for Netflix, most likely the vast majority of them.
- [16:25]
Matt Bellany
The Walking Dead Dead City Returns exclusively on AMC and AMC plus why do.
- [16:31]
Amy Poehler
You want to bring back Manhattan?
- [16:33]
Matt Bellany
I hear this island's got no laws, new rules, new enemies.
- [16:39]
Amy Poehler
New York show's about to start. You don't know what they're doing to.
- [16:43]
Matt Bellany
Nikit Amy meaning Mighty Mo the Walking Dead Dead City Sundays Exclusively on AMC and amc.
- [16:55]
Stephen Cahall
This message is a paid partnership with Apple Card One of the most useful things of my life lately has been my Apple card. It's great for game nights, vacations, just life in general and applying was so easy and quick. You can apply, see your credit limit offer, and then start using your card in minutes. Do it while you're watching a basketball game and you can start making purchases before halftime even rolls around. I also love how I can get up to 3% daily cash back on every single purchase. That's more money for game tickets. I feel like I scored big time when I started using Apple Card. Applying the wallet app on your iPhone and start using it right away with Apple pay subject to credit approval. Apple Card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch terms and more@applecard.com so why isn't Netflix already doing this?
- [17:43]
Matt Bellany
Sometimes analysts, by the way, you write these things as suggestions, but you've been tipped sometimes that this is in the works. Is this happening and you just can't say it?
- [17:53]
Amy Poehler
Absolutely not. But hopefully what we're doing here is we're putting together some pieces of a puzzle and looking at what may happen and we'll see if we're correct. Now, Ted Sarandos was asked, I think in April at a conference about this and it came up on the last earnings call and they have said a couple of times that they think that Netflix is a very native platform for creators.
- [18:15]
Matt Bellany
What does that mean?
- [18:17]
Amy Poehler
Well, there's what they've said and then what we could guess it means.
- [18:19]
Matt Bellany
So I think what they said, I tend not to quote the earnings call stuff because A, it's. Some of it is just puffery and B, like they have reversed course so many times off of what they have said on earnings call. It's kind of hilarious.
- [18:31]
Amy Poehler
If nothing else, it says that they are open to talking to these folks and seeing what can be figured out. Right. And so I think the deal with Ms. Rachel is a good piece of evidence that there is some discussion going on there.
- [18:42]
Matt Bellany
Well, and they were very pissed they didn't get the MrBeast show. I know that.
- [18:46]
Amy Poehler
So there you go. Right. The conversations are clearly happening. And then it's just a matter of, you know, making the magic that you need contractually to turn those conversations into growth. And then I would, as an analyst say that, you know, they're thinking about ways to grow and expand. They have the TF1 deal.
- [19:03]
Matt Bellany
That's the French television that where they're going to air the French feed of a television network, which is an interesting one because it suggests that maybe the future of Netflix could be airing the traditional linear feeds of the networks that they have disrupted, which is a whole separate episode of the show.
- [19:21]
Amy Poehler
Yes. I think that'll be more selective than. Than a strategy overall.
- [19:26]
Matt Bellany
Oh, you don't think they're just going to have a tab for watch live TV and it's just going to be all the feeds of the networks from around the world.
- [19:33]
Amy Poehler
I don't. I think there are markets where a network has a huge amount of share in local language. And TF1. Is that in France with its sports rights? I think it's a bit of a special situation. But clearly shows that Netflix is looking that. I mean, in America you have Peacock, you have Paramount, plus you have ESPN and Fox going into streaming. So I'm just not sure that's replicable, at least in. In the US market. But so when they think about ways to grow, they have a lot of these different pieces. I just don't know how creator content isn't one of the most attractive ones.
- [20:03]
Matt Bellany
Yeah, they downplay it, though. Like, this came up in the podcast conversation as to whether Netflix is going to go after podcasts to adapt for TV, which is a big category of YouTube content and would sort of make sense for them to do a Pat McAfee style show that can eat up hours and bring people back to their live content every day on the platform. They've sort of downplayed that and suggested that, yeah, we're looking at all kinds of content and podcasters may be part of that. And maybe there's YouTubers that would make sense for Netflix, but they've never suggested it's an initiative or a category like you are suggesting.
- [20:45]
Amy Poehler
Yeah, I guess the shorter answer is we'll, we'll have to see. But the growth for them out of film and original series is much more limited at this point.
- [20:55]
Matt Bellany
Yeah, they're slowing. The engagement is still going up, but they are slowing in their growth rates, which is concerning, I know, to people at the company.
- [21:04]
Amy Poehler
And they want to grow and they have scope to grow. Right. They have capital to grow. They have a tech platform and a reach that allows them to grow. But in three years, there's just not that much they can pick up from a content spend standpoint.
- [21:18]
Matt Bellany
Well, they've got big competitors there too. I mean, they're not winning every package. Now, these filmmakers want theaters, which Netflix doesn't offer, and Amazon is offering theaters. So Amazon is getting a bunch of these big packages. They've lost to Warner Brothers on some of these things. And Apple will spend what it takes to get packages for film and top shows. Netflix gets a lot of that stuff too, but they're not the only game in town. And if they were all of a sudden throwing a couple hundred million dollars at Dude, Perfect and Rhett and Link and all these other big YouTube creators, maybe they could carve out a category there that would be not exclusive, but something that the others are not doing.
- [22:04]
Amy Poehler
I think that's right. And would continue to separate them from some of their more traditional peers, you know, as well as giving them a new area of growth. And on the other end of the spectrum, one thing we haven't talked about is just age cohort within this, you know, so they are a TV platform. They're sort of in the middle from a generational perspective, maybe somewhere between linear TV and YouTube. But if you look at any metric of TV consumption by age, younger folks are not watching it as much and older folks are maintaining it. So this is also a type of content that gives them a bit of sort of generational shift. De risking.
- [22:41]
Matt Bellany
It gives Junior a reason to watch.
- [22:43]
Amy Poehler
Exactly.
- [22:44]
Matt Bellany
You know, when mom and dad have Netflix, it brings Junior into the tent, and then maybe he or she becomes a lifelong Netflix subscriber and can age out of the creator content and start watching more professional content. Or maybe they don't. Maybe they just spend their life watching games, guys jumping off the Empire State Building.
- [23:03]
Amy Poehler
We can only hope or not hope.
- [23:06]
Matt Bellany
I mean, do you have any thoughts on the kinds of content that might work for Netflix? The kinds of YouTubers that might work? Does it need to be revamped? Do they need to say to these creators, okay, here's $300 million, come over to Netflix, but develop shows, develop something that feels premium. If you're, let's say, dude, perfect, because we've had them on the show. They do trick shots and sports videos and skydiving videos and things like that. Do they need to come up with a format of a more traditional show, or do you just say to them, do what you do, we'll put it on Netflix and we'll see how it does?
- [23:47]
Amy Poehler
I think the feels premium is the best point in that. And so, you know, to use another example where we've seen this, Joe Rogan had a podcast and Spotify decided for a period to make him exclusive to Spotify. And I think if you said what was premium about the Joe Rogan experience, love it or hate it, but it's the quality of guests that he has on. Right. That's what sets that podcast maybe apart from. From others. They tend to be very, very famous people oftentimes.
- [24:18]
Matt Bellany
Yeah. Although those people are making the rounds a lot of times on free podcasts as well. I would disagree on that one. I don't think that the popularity of Joe Rogan is the quality of the guests. I think there is something about his sensibility and the mix of comedy and politics and conspiracy and hang time that is the appeal there. But what you're saying is essentially that there are elements of these popular shows that take them beyond typical YouTubers, and you have to identify what that is, hone in on it and emphasize it on Netflix.
- [24:52]
Amy Poehler
Correct. That you have to. You have to at least hone in on what makes it premium. So I think you and I would agree that Joe Rogan is a premium piece of content in some broadly defined sense.
- [25:01]
Matt Bellany
Yeah.
- [25:02]
Amy Poehler
And because these YouTubers have big reach based on the views and hours, again, a lot of their hours per year are bigger than Netflix's biggest shows. So from that almost definition there, their sort of premium reach, there's probably then a mix of, you know, runtime per episode, quality of production, some things like that, which also Netflix can play a role in supporting, you know, even with a little bit of production capital to ensure that it still has some of the parameters that they find important.
- [25:32]
Matt Bellany
Yeah, when Mr. Beast went to Amazon, he upped the prize money on his show to make it feel premium because he didn't. He wanted it to be bigger and better than what he can do on YouTube. So you think that Netflix, if they did this, could get to $1,500 a share for their stock and a trillion dollar valuation. You think that's reasonable?
- [25:55]
Amy Poehler
So an unconfirmed report said that management has a 2030 target of a 1 trillion market cap. Netflix has gone out of its way to not confirm this report, but it's certainly on the mind of investors.
- [26:09]
Matt Bellany
They say it was not a projection, it was a goal that they throw around in meetings and not necessarily to be taken seriously by people like you.
- [26:19]
Amy Poehler
Yes, but of course we do take it seriously because it's quantitative and it's market cap based and that's what we do for a living. And so I've kind of taken a look at that and thought, if this is a goal, whether it's a goal for the company, whether it's a goal for investors, how do you get there? And I think the broad conclusion is it's going to take multiple areas of expansion.
- [26:40]
Matt Bellany
Licensing content, I think is one, the sports aspect and growing the live business and the advertising is another. And this could be the, you know, another pillar of growth.
- [26:52]
Amy Poehler
Correct.
- [26:53]
Matt Bellany
This would be pretty terrible for Hollywood and the traditional Hollywood creators. Right. I mean, if Netflix has a fixed budget and they're what, including all the sports and all that stuff, about 18 billion and all of a sudden you are taking a billion or two out of that ecosystem and putting it into creators, digital creators, that necessarily means less for the traditional professional creators now within Netflix.
- [27:23]
Amy Poehler
I mean, I think that's a fair conclusion and I think a good way to think about the swing in production. You could look at, for example, Disney talks about their content spend. Sports typically grows within that. And so you would pencil out that the non sports piece has come down over time and been rationalized. Now Amazon, Apple, those are kind of swing producers right now when it comes to professional Hollywood content. So whether or not the total professional production budget is coming down is a slightly different story. But Netflix, as big as they are, I think it's unlikely to think that they are going to grow in their spend in sort of Hollywood type of content.
- [28:01]
Matt Bellany
Interesting. All right, well, One of these YouTubers who gets a hundred million dollar 200 million deal, they need to send you a fruit basket when that happens because I think you're an influential analyst and you're nudging Netflix could make a big difference here.
- [28:14]
Amy Poehler
They can pay for my next tattoo.
- [28:16]
Matt Bellany
Exactly. Pay for your next tattoo. You gotta have more than Michael. NASA. Rich Greenfield also 10 tatted up all over.
- [28:23]
Amy Poehler
We'll have a contest when you go to a video version.
- [28:26]
Matt Bellany
Yes, I know. That's coming soon. We got to get that sweet Netflix Money on our YouTube videos. Thank you very much, Stephen Cahall.
- [28:33]
Amy Poehler
Thank you.
- [28:35]
Matt Bellany
We are back with the call sheet. Producer Jesse in for producer Craig today. Craig is in Italy for the week. Wouldn't tell us exactly where he's going, but sources have told me that he will be at the Jeff Bezos Lauren Sanchez wedding. Surprising he got an invite. Jesse, are. Are you a little surprised?
- [28:53]
Amy Poehler
I am. I just hope he brings us back something from a gift bag, which I'm sure will be very elite.
- [28:59]
Matt Bellany
Yes, I'm sure it will be a gift bag for the ages if he doesn't get pelted by the protesters that are objecting to them taking over Venice for the event. But he's missing a big weekend at the box office. Another big one. We're in the middle of summer now. F1, the movie is out this weekend. This is the Big Apple. $200 million plus they're saying 200 million. I'm a little suspicious on that. I think it's more they are putting it out through Warner Brothers doing a full global release. Tracking has been kind of all over the place for this one. NRG has it at 38. I've seen some numbers that say it's going to get up to 50 for the weekend. Let's put the line at 45 and I'm going to take the under. I just don't think, even with Brad Pitt, even with the marketing blitz, that this one is going to break through in this country. I think overseas it's going to do better. But 45 seems a heavy lift for this one.
- [29:56]
Amy Poehler
I know some people who are super into cars and in the car racing community and even they're not super excited about this movie. Their reaction was, yeah, I guess I'll go watch it this weekend.
- [30:08]
Matt Bellany
Yeah. Traditionally, the racing movies have a tough time at the box office. Ford v Ferrari actually did okay and it opened to about 30 million. You know, Brad Pitt, big value add and F1, obviously the big racing brand globally. Apple did an interesting thing where they force fed all of their Apple wallet users a $10 coupon.
- [30:30]
Stephen Cahall
I saw that.
- [30:30]
Matt Bellany
I got that yesterday via Fandango. Maybe that'll be meaningful. I saw some negativity online about, you know, Apple people upset that they were being pushed the discount for a movie they didn't want to see. But maybe that'll be impactful. I mean, that's sort of what you should be doing. If you are in a billion people's pockets, you should be sending them notifications that you have a big budget movie coming out this weekend. But it's actually also not the only movie. Megan 2.0 is coming out via Universal Blumhouse. This one's even more of a shocker. The first one opened to 30 million and this one is tracking in the, like, low 20s. Like, I'm not really sure what happened here.
- [31:12]
Amy Poehler
Yeah, it's weird. It doesn't even feel like a sequel. I don't really feel any of the hype at all, despite how good the first one was. And the trailer made it feel like the second one was going to be very over the top.
- [31:22]
Matt Bellany
Well, younger women are powering this one. It's PG13. Yeah, that's basically the plot of Terminator 2 where Megan now has to become good to take on an even more evil one. But yeah, I'm not. I think Universal is a little puzzled by this one as well because you'd think that the quickie sequel to a big hit would open bigger than the first one. But I'm going to put the line at 23, let's say 24. And I will take the under as well. I just don't think that the buzz is there for this one. We'll see. I'm taking the under on two big movies this weekend. A little bit of a risk. I want to say these movies are going to do better, but I'm just not optimistic. All right, that's the show for today. I want to thank my guest, Stephen Cahall, producer Craig Horlebeck, art editor Jesse Lopez, the Jeff Bezos, Lauren Sanchez gift bag. And I want to thank you. We'll see you next week.