Ed Martin on Dan Bongino vs. DOJ, and Republicans in Congress Secretly Plotting Against Trump

Summary

Summary of "Ed Martin on Dan Bongino vs. DOJ, and Republicans in Congress Secretly Plotting Against Trump"

The Tucker Carlson Show
Host: Tucker Carlson
Guest: Ed Martin
Release Date: May 14, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of The Tucker Carlson Show, host Tucker Carlson welcomes Ed Martin to discuss pressing issues surrounding the Department of Justice (DOJ), the political dynamics within the Republican Party, and the ongoing efforts to counteract what they perceive as systemic biases and conspiracies targeting former President Donald Trump and his allies.

---

DOJ Nomination Challenges and Political Obstruction

Ed Martin shares his firsthand experience with the nomination process for the U.S. Attorney position in Washington, D.C. He explains how President Trump bypassed traditional timelines to appoint him immediately upon taking office, aiming to swiftly implement reforms within the DOJ.

Notable Quote:
Ed Martin [02:37]: "Now, it's the greatest Prosecutor's office in the world, really. It's got all of the city level crime. It's like a D.A. It's a great D.A. office and then a huge U.S. attorney's office with cases all over the world and all sorts of complicated, interesting stuff."

However, despite his qualifications and the President's support, Martin discusses how Senator Thom Tillis obstructed his confirmation in the Judiciary Committee, highlighting internal divisions within the Republican Party.

Notable Quote:
Tucker Carlson [08:00]: "Yeah, no, no, that's not quite true. No. Look, I would have won on the floor, but the Judiciary Committee. Tillis. Thom Tillis decided to block it in the Judiciary Committee."

---

Weaponization of the Legal System

Both hosts express concerns over the DOJ's alleged misuse of legal mechanisms to target conservative figures. Martin criticizes the use of specific charges, such as the 1512 statute, to prosecute individuals linked to controversial events like the January 6th Capitol breach.

Notable Quote:
Ed Martin [04:03]: "It's called democracy. And he actually put some, you know, he put. He signed what he gave us the direction he wanted us to do."

Martin argues that these legal strategies are part of a broader effort to undermine the Republican agenda and silence dissent.

---

January 6th Insurrection and Subsequent Prosecutions

The discussion delves into the aftermath of the January 6th events, with Martin accusing the DOJ of overstepping by aggressively prosecuting participants. He contends that the charges levied were excessive and politically motivated.

Notable Quote:
Tucker Carlson [05:25]: "Remember this?"

Ed Martin [13:28]: "It was an insight into the mind of people that are trapped in that understanding."

---

Systemic Corruption and Deep State Influences

Carlson and Martin explore the concept of the "deep state," citing institutions like Georgetown University as being complicit in maintaining systemic biases. They allege that these institutions, supported by government funding, play a significant role in perpetuating misinformation and suppressing conservative viewpoints.

Notable Quote:
Ed Martin [38:21]: "Georgetown is one of those things that's not a private institution. It's an arm of the deepest of the deep state."

---

Efforts to Restore Integrity Within the DOJ

Ed Martin outlines his initiatives to combat corruption and restore integrity within the DOJ. He emphasizes the importance of transparency, accountability, and proactive measures to dismantle perceived biases.

Notable Quote:
Tucker Carlson [53:42]: "And so the question is, how endemic is the weaponization. Right. And we both know the answer. This is."

---

Information Warfare and Media Bias

A significant portion of the conversation centers on the battle over information, with both hosts criticizing mainstream media outlets like The Washington Post for perpetuating biased narratives. Martin shares his experiences with media manipulation, including issues with Wikipedia and other platforms that, in his view, distort the truth against conservative figures.

Notable Quote:
Ed Martin [58:54]: "It's in league with Google. So it's the, it's the first result on everything. Every noun you punch in gets Wikipedia first."

---

Future Outlook and Continuing Struggles

The episode concludes with a reflection on the ongoing struggle against systemic biases and the importance of maintaining resilience in the face of mounting opposition. Both Carlson and Martin stress the necessity of continued efforts to expose corruption and uphold democratic principles.

Notable Quote:
Tucker Carlson [81:32]: "But it is something that we have to live with and work through and pray about and try to build the community about to see."

---

Key Themes and Insights

1. Political Obstruction: Internal Republican conflicts hinder the swift implementation of DOJ reforms aimed at countering systemic biases.
2. Legal System Weaponization: The DOJ is accused of using legal tactics to target and suppress conservative figures and movements.
3. Deep State Influence: Institutions like Georgetown University are portrayed as complicit in maintaining government agendas against conservative interests.
4. Media Bias and Information Warfare: Mainstream media and platforms like Wikipedia are criticized for perpetuating misinformation and bias against conservatives.
5. Reform and Accountability: Emphasis on the need for transparency and accountability within government bodies to restore public trust and uphold democratic values.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Ed Martin [02:37]: "Now, it's the greatest Prosecutor's office in the world, really. It's got all of the city level crime..."
• Tucker Carlson [08:00]: "Yeah, no, no, that's not quite true. No. Look, I would have won on the floor..."
• Ed Martin [04:03]: "It's called democracy. And he actually put some, you know, he put..."
• Ed Martin [38:21]: "Georgetown is one of those things that's not a private institution..."
• Tucker Carlson [53:42]: "And so the question is, how endemic is the weaponization. Right. And we both know the answer..."

---

Conclusion

This episode of The Tucker Carlson Show provides a critical examination of the DOJ's role in political prosecutions, the internal dynamics of the Republican Party, and the broader struggle against what the hosts perceive as systemic corruption and bias. Through their dialogue, Carlson and Martin advocate for increased accountability, transparency, and efforts to reclaim democratic integrity from institutional overreach.

Transcript

[Tucker Carlson]

The NBA playoffs are here and I'm getting my best in on FanDuel.

[Ed Martin]

Talk to me, Chuck.

[Tucker Carlson]

GPT. What do you know? All sorts of interesting stuff. Even Charles Barkley's greatest fear. Hey, nobody needs to know that. New customers bet $5 and get 200 in bonus bets if you win. FanDuel.

[Ed Martin]

America's number one sportsbook 21 plus in President select states must be first online.

[Tucker Carlson]

Real money wager $5 deposit required. Bonus issued is non withdrawable bonus bets.

[Ed Martin]

That expires seven days after receipt. Restrictions apply. See full [e-mail] sportsbook gambling problem.

[Tucker Carlson]

Call 1-800-GAMBLER this woman came up to me screeching in a way. I mean, she can't know me. She didn't know me. I never met her. Screeching, screeching, screeching, swearing and then spitting.

[Ed Martin]

That suggests that your mere physical presence evokes an emotional response. DOJ is a bigger mess even than some conspiracy minded people on the outside like me.

[Tucker Carlson]

Imagine some people that say, what's Dan doing? Bung. You know, he's going hammer and tongs at this stuff right here. The scope is bigger and it is therefore much, much worse than p people think.

[Ed Martin]

Why would Thom Tillis be the instrument of your destruction?

[Tucker Carlson]

He railed on J6. He said, how could you represent J6 people? How could. How stupid do people have to be to go into the Capitol and blah, blah, blah.

[Ed Martin]

The Republican Party tells you they're one thing, but they're actually another thing.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right now it's Trump's party. It's just that some of the elites don't want to let go.

[Ed Martin]

Right, Exactly. You want your kid to go to Georgetown. Oh, it goes to Georgetown. It's way more than that. People just have no idea. The CIA small arms training facility was on their campus. It's an arm of the deepest of the deep state. Way worse than Harvard, actually. I think. Thank you for doing this. So I know I'm laughing. I saw a very angry young woman spit in your face on camera two days ago. That suggests that your mere physical presence evokes an emotional response. Why? D.C. is in trouble. I'm from there. I can. I can vouch for that. You're gonna fix it. What exactly do you think, from your perspective, was the resistance to you?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, first I'd like to point out Tucker, because I've been accused of having a signature piece of clothing. Now, like in the old days, the bow tie, you know, the jacket that they sort of Rainco coat. Yeah. The New York Times Called it my signature. It was very effective because the spit went on in the raincoat, it was able to be cleaned up.

[Ed Martin]

It's very old school Watergate, by the way.

[Tucker Carlson]

Colombo. I'm going Colombo. Not, as my kids said, Inspector Gadget. I thought that was degrading. And I've indicted all three of the four of them now. All right, so look, I did the job. The President Trump gave me this incredible privilege. Usually a U.S. attorney is nominated and then they get confirmed, and then they come into office, right? So it's usually like October, and you finally get somebody in office, and that whole time you have the Sally Yates problem. Remember Sally Yates, who was acting. You have some acting person that's either undermining you or is not totally into the job.

[Ed Martin]

Exactly.

[Tucker Carlson]

Okay. So I said to the President a while ago, if you want me to do this job, can I have it on day one? And he agreed, and he put me on day one. And so day one, we started swinging right away and at all the things that we needed to swing at, right? We, first of all, day one, we had the pardons, 1600 pardons. Day two or three, we had two pardons of cops. Day three or four, we had all the Face act pardons. It's a busy first week. But more importantly, as we were talking about off air, I started swinging. We started actually going for it. We said, okay, we're going to. We're weaponization. You know, Chuck Schumer's a bully. And we went at this fight hammer and tongs. And everybody noticed. Everybody noticed. Chuck Schumer noticed. Dick Durbin starts firing off letters of complaint, all kinds of things. And that's how you're supposed to do the job.

[Ed Martin]

I wish it was consistent with the president's mandate since he was just elected by the majority of voters.

[Tucker Carlson]

Exactly right.

[Ed Martin]

It's called democracy.

[Tucker Carlson]

It's called democracy. And he actually put some, you know, he put. He signed orders. He signed what he gave us the direction he wanted us to do. Executive orders said, stop the weaponization. Go look at this. And then, by the way, Attorney General Bondi got in. She gave us an even more specific list, Right? So, but more importantly, Tucker, if it was a hundred years ago, maybe you could just be genteel and prosecute the cases as they came along, right? You could sit around and say, sooner or later it'll all work out. It's not 100 years ago. And the fight right now is a fight over everything from information to accountability to healing, right? So that's the fight. And us Attorney is on the front lines in Washington, D.C. when they're going after Elon Musk or. Or Judge Boasberg. They went after both. And I gave both of them a letter that said, hey, I got your back. If you even threaten these people in a way that goes over the line, we're going to. We're going to indict you.

[Ed Martin]

You're talking about the mob threatening with physical violence.

[Tucker Carlson]

They mob. The mob threatened Elon and the Doge guys. The mob threatened my prosecutors, the mob threatened Boasberg. And I said, any of these things, we're going to put a stop to it. So. But what happens is I don't. I've not been able to try this out. I'll try to see if you like it. The Schumer smear. Schumer was so mad that I got into office and I said, hold on a second. You're not allowed to say the wor whirlwind is coming for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. And then a month later, Kavanaugh's got a guy with zip ties and a gun. Remember this?

[Ed Martin]

This is this very well.

[Tucker Carlson]

And so I said, hold on. The statute of limitations is coming five years. I'm going to investigate this, and I'm going to ask Chuck Schumer, what did you mean? You cannot mean that you're allowed to stand and threaten justices. Right. And so I put that out. He refused to answer. He said, it's offensive, all that stuff. And then he went on a jihad inside the Senate. He got opposition research and he went member to member and said, this guy Martin, you can't vote for him. This guy Martin, you can't. And so it's the Schumer smear. Then they call me names in the Washington Post. You know, the Washington Post bid something they've never done before. Tucker underneath the head, the. The line. Spencer Hu, he put a thing that said, if you have any tips on Martin, send them to us. They've never done this before. That's like, we want to get Martin. Send us the tips. I sent. I sent a letter to Bezos. I said, hey, I'm not sure this is how the newspaper is supposed to run. He hasn't responded yet. But my point is, President Trump said, fight for the future of the country. And that fight can't be trapped in the article three gentility of a hundred years ago. It's the fight we got right now, and that's what we're doing. So I think they hated me. And this woman came up to me, Screeching in a way. I mean, she can't know me. She didn't know me. I never met her as screeching, screeching, screeching, swearing and then spitting. You know, I don't know. I just.

[Ed Martin]

Who was she? What happened to her?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, they've identified her, and I guess they've. They've. I don't know if they've picked her up yet, but they know exactly who it is and all that. And so, as you might imagine, imagine I'm not involved in the case because, you know, I'm the victim in this case. So, yes, it's got to be processed. But I think that, you know, marshals and FBI were right on it, and they've. They've got to figure it out.

[Ed Martin]

Do you think the genesis of the opposition was your request to Chuck Schumer that he answer questions about encouraging violence against the Supreme Court? Justice?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I think that I. The role I am played was. Is epitomized. Epitomized by that right public and willing to fight for the right things. And Schumer certainly took it. Took it to heart and made a big deal out of. And then they just made me into somebody who's. The Washington Post had me on the front page of A1 or B1 every day for three or four weeks, like Wild A. U.S. attorney, Dick Durbin, sent me 561 questions. District Court judges don't get that many. You know, no U.S. attorney's ever gotten that many. Question after question accusing me of this and that and the other thing. So they obviously knew. They didn't like something about what I was doing, and the public picks up on it. Right.

[Ed Martin]

And they worried what you would do.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, that's. I think that's fair.

[Ed Martin]

So the U.S. attorney needs Senate confirmation. Democrats control the Senate by a huge margin. Is that correct?

[Tucker Carlson]

Something like that, yeah.

[Ed Martin]

Oh, no, that's not true.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, no, no, that's. That's not quite true. No. Look, I would have won on the floor, but the Judiciary Committee. Tillis. Tillis. Thom Tillis decided to block it in the Judiciary Committee.

[Ed Martin]

Democrat from California.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah. Well, something like that. Oh, no.

[Ed Martin]

Republican from North Carolina.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right.

[Ed Martin]

So why would Thom Tillis, who was elected in maybe 2012, 14, something like that. Ish. But a lot of money spent on that campaign. A lot of Republicans mobilized. Didn't get that guy elected in a swing state even then. And, you know, a lot of hope residing in Thom Tillis. Why would Thom Tillis be the instrument of your destruction?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, look, I think, you know, I got to say, Senate's got a process, respect the process, all that stuff. Right. So check the box. I did that with you. So I met with a guy for 90 minutes. You know, for, by the way, for about a decade, I've done work. When Phyllis Schlafly, the late Phyllis. Laughter. For whom I worked, one of the things she cared a lot about was patents and protecting individual patent holders and inventors. So for years, we've had patent events. One of the participants in the patent events is Thom Tillis. All the time, because he's good on that issue and we would work with him. So not a stranger in terms of policy stuff to me. So when I met with him 90 minutes, he, he railed on J6. He said, how could you represent J6 people? How could, how stupid do people have to be to go into the Capitol and blah, blah, blah. And I said, sir, you know, look, I've looked at this closely. It feels like you're not quite paying attention to what happened. Right. And. And that.

[Ed Martin]

That's correct.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah. And look, here's the thing. You know, Tucker, this is, this is what I mean by this is the fight we're in, this fight for the future of our country. Millions of Americans are fall victim to the hoaxes one after another.

[Ed Martin]

Yes.

[Tucker Carlson]

And if you fall victim to the J6 hoax, that it was an insurrection, armed and this close to the end, then you might act like Tom Tillis and you might rant and rave and say things like that, and that's what he did. But if you're, I think if you're not under the spell of the hoax, you say, wait a second, lots of people were waved into the Capitol. And, and maybe you could charge them with trespass, but you can't throw them in jail for three, four years, three and a half years. Right. Because of. And then the Supreme Court, bipartisan Supreme Court throws out the charge that was used. It's called the 1512 charge. When I got in my office as U.S. attorney, I said, first week, we're going to look at the 1512, who charged it? And of course, it was charged by Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco right across. It wasn't. It wasn't. The guy in my chair, he said he was an empty suit there to just, you know, carry water as they went.

[Ed Martin]

Right. DOJ directly.

[Tucker Carlson]

All the way. Right up. Right up. Of course. I mean, look, 1512 is an Andrew Weissman creation. Right. This was Andrew Weissman advocated for 1512 charge. Who's Andrew Weissman in the Mueller investigation? And The Mueller Invest. Andrew Weissman's one of these lawyers who is at NYU right now. He goes in and out of government, and he's basically at the center. There's about six or seven of these people that are at the center of coordinating the weaponization of government against the people right now. And yes, every time you turn around. Yeah, I love. I'll give it to you. The guy that was the prosecutor in Kosovo before, Jack Smith, you know, a special prosecutor.

[Ed Martin]

Yeah.

[Tucker Carlson]

Forget his name right now. He left so Jack Smith could come in. Where'd he go? One guess. Nyu. To Andrew Weissman's shop.

[Ed Martin]

Perfect.

[Tucker Carlson]

So when you watch Andrew Weissman's at Mueller, he says in Mueller, we need 1512. We can charge Trump in the. Watch this. We can use 1512. We're making it up, but we can get away with it if we build it out this way and just get everybody to go along. He fails at that. Mueller, you know, Barr says, and. And Jeff Jensen. No, Barr says, you can't do that. Right. You can't do. We're not going to do that. Shuts it down. And then along comes Andrew Weissman, Lisa Monaco, all these same people. They say, charge the 1512. Tucker, the 1512 charge. Right. Your viewers may not track it well enough, but 1512 was an addition to the law about 20 years ago after Enron, because Arthur Anderson, the accounting firm, was destroying documents. Enron was the target of the investigation. Arthur Anderson was destroying documents, wasn't the target. And there was no law to say if you knew there was an investigation, you shouldn't destroy documents. So they passed this law. Okay, 1512. It said, if, you know there's an official proceeding, you're not allowed to destroy documents. Okay, you got it?

[Ed Martin]

Yeah.

[Tucker Carlson]

Okay, that's it. All these years later, Weissman is saying, we'll use, you know, obstruction of official proceeding. We'll expand official proceeding. We'll call it. Oh, yeah, we'll call it the electoral College count, and we'll go after everybody. But first, before we go for Trump, let's drag a couple of hundred people into jail. We'll make them plead guilty. We'll try them with a bad jury. We'll make the judges roll along, and we'll make sure we put them in one after another. We'll say, see, 1512. It's a good charge. Judges went for it, everybody went for it. And then we'll get Trump. And one judge said, no. Then it went up to the Supreme Court, and the bipartisan Supreme Court said, hell, no, and threw it all out. So we watched American citizens rotting in jail for years for walking through the Capitol and 1512. And that's why Untilis is okay with that. Until this is. Well, Tillis is saying, oh, my gosh. He said, anyone who's dumb enough to go into the Capitol should be charged with everything on the Sun. I said, well, if a cop opens the door and you walk in and you walk out, you're going to charge him. And anyway, so what did he say when you asked? Well, he said, you know.

[Ed Martin]

You know, that's about what I. That's almost what I was about to say.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah.

[Ed Martin]

That we now have videotape. Jake Chansley, for example. The Qanon shaman led into the Senate chamber by a cop.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right.

[Ed Martin]

Wanders around and then leaves and then goes to prison.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right.

[Ed Martin]

I don't understand. And I. I want to be charitable to Tom Tillis, who is obviously very liberal, and there are things about him I don't like. But I. I want to be fair, but I don't understand how he couldn't know that.

[Tucker Carlson]

It was an. It was an insight into the mind of people that are trapped in that understanding. And, you know, like, I. The other thing they all said to me is, oh, you must like people that hit cops because you defended people that hit cops.

[Ed Martin]

Who said that?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, everybody. The New York. The Washington Post. Because lawyers are supposed to defend, you know, we defend the sort of worst of the worst always. That's the system.

[Ed Martin]

People who've been charged with crimes.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, exactly.

[Ed Martin]

Isn't that the way it works?

[Tucker Carlson]

Isn't that the way it works? But I said, so I say, look, nobody's for hitting cops. Right? Nobody's written cops. Well, I. My office, my predecessor did not charge cops, did not charge assaults on police officers because they're only misdemeanors in the stupid DC Laws. And I said, new law, new rule. Touch a cop getting charged with assault. Right. So stipulate. We're all against hitting cops after that. What happened on January 6, forget about even the day of it. Watch what happens. Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson run $50 million, you know, misinformation campaign to tell the world this is what was going on. And. And that's what Thom Tillis is believing, I guess. And meanwhile, the rest.

[Ed Martin]

But that's like MSNBC level lying. It's like transparent. It was an armed insurrection. Police officers were killed. None of that is true.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, right. And I. Look, I'm. We're. I'm past it now, except to say this. The weaponization of Government against the people is what we see over and over and over again. And when the leaders either acquiesce to it or fall for the hoax of it, we see it over and over and over again. Whether you pick a FISA court, you know, we just watch this over and over and you don't have time to say, was your. Was your heart in it? Are you lying? It's just you're willing to buy into that worldview. It's destroying the country.

[Ed Martin]

Can I ask you one that I couldn't agree more. Can I ask one last question? Did any member of the U.S. senate or member of Congress suggest, like, how many federal agents were in the crowd that day? None of them seem interested in that. Yeah, that seems like a baseline question.

[Tucker Carlson]

Did any members of the Senate in my. Probably not in the conversations I had, but. But that you do bring us to.

[Ed Martin]

Does anyone care?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, you bring us to a point where, as I started this out is we're in a fight for. About information. Right. And we're told, get over it and move on. It's like the 2020 election. Yeah. That people say to me, they say, I was a Stop the Steal organizer. Well, I ran the election board in St. Louis. Back in St. Louis, you know, I ran the election board. I know how elections work. The 2020 election, there were lots of things that were really off base. That's why I've always said it. I maintain it today. Doesn't mean I have it proved. That doesn't mean that I've proven the election was stolen. No, but I know there's things that were off. Well, you weren't allowed to say that. Remember, you're not even allowed to say that out loud. And you go forward and so they say, oh, you were stopped to steal. So I said, wait, isn't that the system we're supposed to have? Like to. And we, we keep seeing information government weaponized to stop information flow. And most of us move on. Right. You move on to the next thing. Because the way the world is moving and one of the things this effort to do to focus on weaponization is, is to get the truth out. So to your point, we still don't know the answer to that. We do not know how many ages. How can we not know? I mean, I'm going to. I'm going to get it out or I'm going to die trying. Pipe bomber. As a prosecutor, I've got the pipe bomber case in my office. The FBI Bongino said to the FBI, change all the agents and everybody look at it again. It's been going on for about five weeks. It's like Keystone Cops, you know, they didn't interview some of the people that were. That you would have said that might be a suspect. They hadn't interviewed him. I mean, so the question becomes, what's happening here? Is it incompetence? It feels worse than incompetence. Right. And so that information does it does.

[Ed Martin]

What do you think?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I think, I think it's worse than incompetence. And, and I think, but I think the only way forward is to not describe what I think of the motives, but to expose over and over again what's happened. If you expose what's happened and the truth gets out, then accountability is possible. If you don't expose what's happened, the accountability looks like targeting. Right. So you got to do this one to get to this one, and the other side just does this. And then they count on the media to tell us it's okay, we have to do this and this. And that's my answer to some people that say, what's Dan doing? Bung. You know, I talk to him every week or so. He's going hammer and tongs at this stuff right here. You can't arrest everybody the first, first month, but you got to get this going. And it's a challenge. But I'm glad people are holding us, you know, pushing everybody. It's good, but it's, it's harder than it looks. It really is.

[Ed Martin]

I believe that my informed, well, informed sense is that DOJ is a bigger mess even than some conspiracy minded people on the outside like me. Imagine it is like, I think it's actually a mess is that.

[Tucker Carlson]

I would say that.

[Ed Martin]

Look, FBI specifically.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah. Look, I worked for the, the Catholic Church, right. I worked for the Catholic Church. I'm pretty attuned to bureaucracies, right. And I've seen this, seen the scop them and, and see the institutional inertia, like the momentum that they get. And I think my office Was this, my U.S. attorney's office was about this big, Tucker. And it took me 120 days to get this much of my arms, you know, wrapped around my. This much, because this is how big it was. You know, Cash's job is this big and DOJ's this big and the presence is this big. Yeah. So my answer is the scope is bigger and, and it is therefore much, much worse than people think. And I just think it's a, it's a. And by the way, one of the reasons I say Information is so key. You can't, we can't win the Article 3 battle fast enough. We can fight it and we can eventually win lots of them. You can't win it fast enough to get the progress we need in terms of our. So you've got to be doing the.

[Ed Martin]

Information for people watching. What's the article?

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, the Article 3 means like the federal courts. We're in federal courts. The President says you, you can't let people come into the country. And then the courts say nationwide injunction. And you know, you're not allowed to do that. And you're, you're constantly in court. You know, the U.S. attorney's office for D.C. has all of the cases of when they, when the government is sued, you know, president suits, they all come into our office on the civil side. And so you see all that stuff coming in, you know, in, in the, during the Biden administration, the conservatives were suing in Texas. It was friendlier judges. Now it's in D.C. so you're in the, in the courts fighting to get the truth out, fighting to make these things prosecutions and all. But they take a longer time than just getting the word out. Right. Getting the information out. I just, I feel like it's a different moment in history and that's, that's how I was U.S. attorney. That's why you saw people saw so much out facing action. Because I wasn't just looking at courts, I was looking at making an argument for the public so they could see the policies.

[Ed Martin]

America has thousands of colleges and universities and a lot of them unfortunately are basically just scams. It's one of those things nobody really wants to talk about, but everybody, some level knows that it's true. What's an impressive college in 2025? There aren't many at all. Hillsdale is one of them. It is the exception. They cut straight through the woke garbage. They give their students a real education, an actual education. Meet a Hillsdale student and ask yourself, is this the best educated 22 year old I've met in a long time? Yeah. Because they don't have propaganda in their education, just the truth. Facts, history, English, math. If you. It sounds good. Because it is good. Think of this. Hillsdale is offering over 40 free online courses you can enroll in today. There's no catch at all. You don't have to pay anything. Not going to hit you up for anything. It's free. You can learn about the Constitution, the Bible, the basis of Western civilization, Rome's rise and fall, early Christian church, things that actually matter. Not one dime free. They have a new class called Understanding Capitalism that teaches Americans basic economic ideas, describes our own system, a system that is falling apart. A lot of people want you to hate, but for 250 years has been the best and most productive in the world. You'll understand the basis of our economy from founding till President Hillsdale not afraid to preach the message our country has forgotten which is freedom is good, Christianity is good, markets are good and they make this country better by raising well educated students. We endorse this as a college hater. I love Hillsdale. Go to tuckerforhillsdale.com to sign up for Understanding Capitalism Today. The course Understanding Capitalism, zero cost, just the truth. That's tuckerforhillsdale.com to enroll for free. Don Junior here, guys. Are you receiving letters from the IRS claiming you owe back taxes as penalties and interest fees pile up? The IRS gives you no clear path to resolution. Don't speak to them on your own. They are not your friends. To reach a team of licensed tax professionals that can help you reduce, settle and resolve your tax matters, go to tnusa.com and check them out.

[Tucker Carlson]

Solve your tax problems today.

[Ed Martin]

Call 1-800-780-8888 or visit tnusa.com that's 1-800-780-888. Tucker says it best the credit card companies are ripping Americans off and enough is enough. This is Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas. Our legislation, the Credit Card Competition act, would help end the Grip Visa and MasterCard have on us. Every time you use your credit card, they charge you a hidden fee called a swipe fee, and they've been raising it without even telling you. This hurts consumers and every small business owner. In fact, American families are paying $1,100 in hidden swipes fees each year. The Fees Visa and MasterCard charge Americans are the highest in the world, double Canadas and eight times more than Europe's. That's why I've taken action. But I need your help to help get this passed. I'm asking you to call your senator today and demand they pass the Credit Card Competition act.

[Tucker Carlson]

Paid for by the Merchants Payments Coalition. Not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee.

[Ed Martin]

Www.merrestancespaymentscoalition.com can you go back and I'm sorry I've gone far afield, as usual with me, but so you have to be. You're nominated by the president to be U.S. attorney in D.C. it has to go through the Senate. You offend Chuck Schumer by asking inconvenient questions. He sends out the word Destroy this man. That process begins. And then in the end, it was Thom Tillis, because the Republican joking aside, party does control the Senate, supposedly. Who killed it? How do you account for that? This is like a central job for those who are not paying attention. This is like an. If you're going to drain the swamp, if you're going to end the weaponization of the legal system, if you're going to make good on all the promises the president made while campaigning, you need to fill this job with a capable person. And Thom Tillis winds up torpedoing you. Like.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, you know, I worked for Phyllis Schlafly. Yep. Right. And so when she wrote A Choice, not an Echo in 1964 and all the way through her career and then the last 10 years of her life when I worked with her, you just, you come to know about the party. Right. The Republican Party is probably more problematic in, in certain ways than the Democrat Party is. Obvious opponents. Right. So, so when Phyllis writes about 1964, what they did to, you know, Goldwater at that fight, or she writes in, she wrote about 1980 when they, you know, forced H.W. bush on Reagan. I mean, she, she wrote about, but she also wrote about, by the way, about the Bilderberg. She's the first one to use the word Bilderbergs about the, the globalists when they're meeting. But Phyllis would say, you know, and Todd, look, she backed Trump to, she backed Trump early. And it, it basically, well, it caused a, a rift in her family. One of her children was a cruise person was against her. It caused a rift in her organization. And I remember asking her, I'm like, kind of seriously, is this worth it?

[Ed Martin]

It.

[Tucker Carlson]

And she said, of course it's worth it. She said, you know, this is. And so that was on our side, that was on the sort of conservative side. So I'm not surprised by any of it. I was on the RNC when they did the autopsy, remember, you know, Romney, Romney loses and they spend nine or $10 million and the same people got paid. Go back and look who got paid $9 million for the autopsy on the Republican Party. And it said, speak in Spanish and don't talk about social issues and we're just going to win everything. And they, and they made the mistake. They asked me, microphone in my first meeting of the rnc, what do you think of that? And I said, what do you think of your report? And I said, it's not my report. I didn't go, I didn't go for that. That's crazy. Then we'll lose every election. So the Republican Party has always been that way. It's just better than the other one. And, and the question is, right now.

[Ed Martin]

It'S better in some way. I mean, I've never, you know, I vote Democrats because I'm pro life, so I'm not going to vote for pro choice, period. So. That's right. And I think there are a lot of Republican voters who feel that way.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right.

[Ed Martin]

So the Democratic Party is off the table for me, but I'm not sure the Republican Party is better because I think it's more deceptive. Democratic Party's like, yeah, we're the trainee illegal alien party. Okay. That's who you are. I find that repugnant. But the Republican Party tells you they're one thing, but they're actually another thing. That's what bothers me.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, no, I thought, yeah, well, it's the same thing Phyllis talked about. You know, back in the day, it was the establishment on the Eastern establishment, Eastern elites who were trying to control the party and did a lot. Look, right now it's Trump's party. It's just that some of the elites don't want to let go.

[Ed Martin]

Exactly.

[Tucker Carlson]

And so the question is, will they be able to hold on? And when you heard the Pres say, he didn't say Ed wouldn't get confirmed. He said, that's not worth the fight right now. We got other things to do. And, you know, we knew, we knew we'd get somebody good in that spot, to your point, and we knew there's a place for me to play a role. So, you know, I, I. But the Republican Party is Trump's party. It's just some people aren't ready for it.

[Ed Martin]

So it's really, it's not left versus right, moderate versus conservative, populist versus globalist. It's really reform versus corrupt. I mean, I think there's massive corruption in the US Government, in our system.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah.

[Ed Martin]

More broadly, Trump was elected on the promise of cleaning it up. You were his instrument to do that. So I think it's fair to say people who oppose that are against reform.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I, if I can, I'd say two things about it. One thing I think, as we. You've talked about before, in lots of issues, President Trump represents a different view of America. First is the way it's characterized. But this notion of, of believing in ourselves, our citizens, more than other things, including wars and globalists and all that, I think that, I think that's a big pivot. And, and people feel that as Voters obvious. But I will agree with you on this. The corruption is not one party. I mean, trust me, I'm the prosecutor. Oh, I know it's not one party, you know that. But I'm your viewers. It's not one party. When you see $6.7 billion transferred from the EPA to an organization set up a year before, set up by the same leftists, left leaning Democrats supporting folks that ran the housing tax credit boondoggle from the 90s. It's the same people, 6.7 billion. When you see that transfer of money, this is not one party. Both parties are at the trough and the question is who gives us the best chance to try to take, to take this country back and to fight for it. And it's clearly been Trump. But it's an everyday battle.

[Ed Martin]

What are the Republican senators opposed your nomination?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, it's funny, as soon as Tillis blocked it, then a guy like Senator Cornyn said I'm for him. We weren't sure until then. And then I think Colin said, I'm looking at it, I'm thinking about it. So I, I will say that Collins.

[Ed Martin]

Says she was thinking, well, we know that's not true.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, well, I, well actually I had an issue up here. You know, the U.S. attorney has so much interesting role for D.C. the D.C. u.S. Attorney. I went to the DEA and I said, hey guys, what are we not doing? I would go all these law enforcement. I say, what, what is that? What is somebody not doing that I could do to help you guys? And the DEA guy said, we got all these marijuana farms in Chinese drug cartels control Maine. And so they said we can't get under control. And the U.S. attorney up there won't do anything. Said, I'll take it, I'll take the cases. I said, let's figure it out. So I wrote a letter to the main governor and I said, what are you doing about these pod farms that the Chinese are running? You know, we got to take a look at this because you know it's impacting what's going on. And, and so we. Nothing's progressive.

[Ed Martin]

What did Governor Mills say?

[Tucker Carlson]

She had some milquetoast response about something, but no, we're looking into it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But I mean, you know, when you look close, it's a disaster. And, and she and her administration is really not just looking the other way. They're allowing chaos in the, in this state.

[Ed Martin]

Her brother is benefiting.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right?

[Ed Martin]

Yeah, it's, that's probably the most corrupt state outside of New Jersey out of 50 so. But were there any other senators who went on the record?

[Tucker Carlson]

No, no, they were doing a dance. Look, I mean, yeah, McConnell is. In fact, McConnell staff was talking to me about pitching him on the. Because they weren't a. No, a hard no at the beginning, but at that level, in that process, they're all playing a game. Right. Until they have to. Look, Senator Hawley. I'm from Missouri. Senator Hawley said if you get to the floor, you, you'll, you'll definitely get the vote.

[Ed Martin]

They're afraid to vote against you.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right. And. But he said they're going to be all kinds of machinations beforehand. So to your point, I don't know if Tillis was. Senator Tillis was taking one for the team, if he was, you know, killing me to help other people or what, but he was the obvious one that.

[Ed Martin]

Decided the extent, you know, what do you think the real issue was? Why wouldn't Republican senators form, you know, a blue line in support of you? Like what. What was it that made them, you know, 9 11, you said. I mean, rather. 9 11, January 6th.

[Tucker Carlson]

January 6th. I would say that a number of times it was clear that I was not going to be sort of controllable, that I was going to do exactly what I thought and what the president let me loose to do. And I think that that's for the, for the, you know, the sort of ruling class that's the wildest of wild cards. And so a prosecutor who's willing to.

[Ed Martin]

Do that, not controlled by corrupt interests.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah.

[Ed Martin]

That's the scariest thing there is.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right. So, you know. Yeah, but I, I don't really know. I mean, I, you know, I would have bet that I would have gotten through because President Trump wanted me. Yeah. So, you know, it's. It's hard to know. I thought some of the other guys that got confirmed had a lot more checkered pass, but I don't, you know.

[Ed Martin]

But it's not about that. Yeah, of course. It's. It's never the liars who get in trouble. It's the truth tellers who are the threat.

[Tucker Carlson]

Of course, maybe for sure. Okay. I don't know for sure.

[Ed Martin]

They don't care if you lie.

[Tucker Carlson]

They lie.

[Ed Martin]

They love lies. Their father is the father of lies. But you are staying on in the administration.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yes. I mean, it's. I hate to say I got a promotion. I don't want to be too Pollyannish, but I kind of got a promotion. I mean, U.S. attorney's office, to be clear. It's. It's the greatest Prosecutor's office in the world, really. It's got all of the city level crime. It's like a D A. It's a great D A office and then a huge U.S. attorney's office with cases all over the world and all sorts of complicated, interesting stuff. And a huge docket. I can get to all usaid. All the USAID falls within us. So when you see the fraud that's going on in Europe and, and you know, this is all stuff that the U.S. attorney, and trust me, the U.S. attorney's already looking at it. And you can look at this stuff and say, because of the jurisdiction. So. But it's a big office with a lot of bureaucracy. And so when I got. Basically my new job is focused on weaponization. The docket is the whole world and the country to say, where have they done wrong and how do we go and get to the bottom of it? And so look, I'm the President. It's a key moment. It's a key moment. The President trusts me to do this. And so. And Pam Bondi has been great about directing us on this. So I'm excited to go over there and fight.

[Ed Martin]

It's amazing that someone in D.C. so anyone who lives in D.C. knows that the city is mismanaged by Muriel Bowser, the mayor, but it's also kind of falling apart. The real estate market has collapsed because of COVID but also because of crime. And like, they need law enforcement in D.C. and they don't really have it. And yet this woman was so mad at you that she spit, spit on you. It just tells you the power of the propaganda that Schumer unleashed.

[Tucker Carlson]

That's right. Well, I want to brag for a minute. We shifted a lot of our resources to fight crime. You know, you know this. But 720,000 people live in D.C. 650,000 live in poverty in a tough settlement for sure. And frankly, they've been getting. They've been getting stuck by both parties forever. Right? So you walk down the street in Anacostia and you're like, I went to do an interview in Anacostia and we pulled up and there's an ambulance and all. And I said, what is that? And I said, somebody was shot there laying there. And we went in to do the interview. It was like, oh, yeah, so he's not going to die. He's going to be fine. So what we did was we turned all of our resources on that side to getting rid of the guys with guns, the bad guys with guns, and we dragged them to federal Court now that sounds like it's not that, not that revolutionary. But you start to get. In March we got 18 and April 24, arrested. Arrested with guns and off the streets for 700,000 people. What they mostly need to know is somebody's trying to help them make it better. Right. And trying to make life better. And crime is down 25% and the, the basics are going the right direction, so. But no, no, that's that woman screeching at me and spitting on me. Was. That's a fruit of the environment that says make anyone who's doing something important into someone toxic and will get people to be agitated.

[Ed Martin]

But it works.

[Tucker Carlson]

It works. Oh no. Works completely. The only problem is our side, meaning I think God fearing Americans need to understand. I just told you we've got to get the truth out. You can't sit back and say we're right. That doesn't matter. Your neighbor is still being inundated by the Washington Post, right? They're still being told by the Washington Post that somehow know it's problematic that I was on rt, I did interviews on RT and that, oh, this is the end of the world. Well, I mean, Swalwell's got.

[Ed Martin]

You went on art.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, I went on rt. I did interviews on ours.

[Ed Martin]

Did you have a. Did you have sex with the Chinese Communist spy?

[Tucker Carlson]

I was just gonna say no, I did not. Sorry to ask you personal questions, so. But my point is I loved RTRT.

[Ed Martin]

Was a great channel. I didn't agree with everything, but I.

[Tucker Carlson]

Don'T know, I've only been told going.

[Ed Martin]

On RT or did you. Were you the news director? You're just a guest.

[Tucker Carlson]

I've only been told what to say on one network and that was the commun. Cnn. They told me I had to say that otherwise, so. But my point is. To your, to your, to your, to your point, we can't rely on the truth. We're not. We are right. We have to though. And this is where I think there's responsibility in government. We have to expose the truth. We have to expose it. And we have. If they're not shamed, at least Andrew Weissman can hear his name. Andrew Weissman is truly one of the most despicable figures in modern American life. Mary McCord, Georgetown University. Oh, I got in a fight with Georgetown, you know, Georgetown University's man, me, filthy, filthy organization. I wrote Georgetown Law and I said to the dean, we're not going to hire your people either for jobs or internships because you're doing dei. After the President said Stop. Yes, he wrote back and lectured me on Jesuit ideals. Jesuit ideals and freedom. Now, he went to Yale and Harvard. I don't think those are religious, but I went to, you know, Holy Cross, slightly Jesuit the whole time. St. Louis U. Jesuit, on and on and on. And he lectured me. But here's what. Here's what happened.

[Ed Martin]

Quickly, was he a Jesuit?

[Tucker Carlson]

It. No, no, of course not. He said he's not even Catholic. Well, maybe he's Catholic. I don't know. But he's lecturing me. And bar complaints are coming in from people saying Georgetown is great. All I'm saying is this sounds disgusting.

[Ed Martin]

Well, sorry.

[Tucker Carlson]

But more importantly, you talk about weaponizing government, you got this. Rosa Brooks, Mary McCord, these are the people coming out of Obama land, and they're taking the Transition Integrity Project. Remember this? The Transition Integrity Project. And they're saying, how would we do an American color revolution? Right. How would we do that? And they're laying it out. Remember game planning? They were doing this tabletop, and they're looking at and participating are all kinds of Americans with security clearances and, you know, military background.

[Ed Martin]

It's terrifying.

[Tucker Carlson]

And we're supposed to sit here and say, oh, isn't this great? You guys do all of that, and we say nothing. And meanwhile, you get hundreds of millions of dollars in American tax dollars to do it to us. So. So I asked them a question. They got upset. But the point here is.

[Ed Martin]

And Rosa. I know Rosa Brooks. Well, she did that out of Georgetown. Of course.

[Tucker Carlson]

That's what I'm saying. Is an institute. Still. She still.

[Ed Martin]

Georgetown is. I mean, it's had really unhealthy relationships with the U.S. government for many, many decades. I mean, the CIA Small Arms Training facility was on their campus. I know that for a fact because I know someone who trained there. Like, they have been. Georgetown is one of those things that's not a private institution. It's an arm of the deepest of the deep state. And, like, they're scary. And they're supported by US Tax dollars. Like, it's not. It's not a college. Like, you want your kid to go to Georgetown. Oh, it goes to Georgetown. Go Hoyas. It's way more than that. People just have no idea.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, and my point to you is, I agree. And we have to name it.

[Ed Martin]

Yes.

[Tucker Carlson]

It's not enough to us to know. We have to say Mary McCord and Rosa Brooks at Georgetown Law. What they're doing is destructive to the country, and people should know it.

[Ed Martin]

They're planning insurrection. Actually, they speak of it I know using US Tax dollars and all these, you know, nice sort of well meaning Irish Catholic alums around the country who like, don't agree with anything that Rosa Brooks says are sending them money and sending their kids there because the veneer, the skin suit still lives. Georgetown. Pat Buchana went to Georgetown. Okay.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah.

[Ed Martin]

It's the fakest place in the United States. Way worse than Harvard, actually. I think, think.

[Tucker Carlson]

But fake would be bad enough. It's destructive.

[Ed Martin]

It's sinister, destructive.

[Tucker Carlson]

And, and, and again, until you, until we have the. If you think it's a debate, if we, if it's a debating moment, then you're in one spot. If you think it's a battle for the future of the country and the world, then you're in a different moment. And, and that, and that's how I look at what we're, what we're seeing going on. And that's why I think some people probably realized he knows how this goes a little more. And, and, and so they didn't want me in that spot. But, but I got another spot, so it'll work out.

[Ed Martin]

It's just so revealing. I'll just say it one last time because I can't control myself that you were torpedoed by supposedly conservative Republicans. I gave a speech on Thom Tillis behalf when he ran for the first time for Senate. And I sort of think that like you're getting one thing, but almost 100% of the time the person winds up to be John Cornyn or you know, like a super aggressive liberal posing as a conservative Republican. It's so weird. Do you understand the mindset?

[Tucker Carlson]

There's no, I, you know, my, my wife, who's like you, smarter than me and so she said the other day, why can't we go back to term limits? You know, I mean, it's this instinct of. There's something, there's something about when they're in. In for a while they seem to have figured out for. They think they figured out what's better for everyone. I, I don't really know. Look, one of the problems I hate is. I know you do. Is tell. Just tell me the truth to my face if this is what you're doing.

[Ed Martin]

Well, that's what I respect about Tillis. At least he lectured you in private.

[Tucker Carlson]

That's right, he did. And I like that. And he unloaded on me in private.

[Ed Martin]

Well, good. I mean, good. I mean, yeah, I disagree. I think a lot of things. I've already expressed them, but I admire that.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah. So. But I don't know what gets the. The. Well, I do know the system is so powerful and so, so alluring and seductive that after a while, you know, I think it's inevitable that even good people are, are tempted to a worldview that's not as good, even if they're not tempted to pure strain on corruption. So it is a problem. Problem.

[Ed Martin]

There's just so much money.

[Tucker Carlson]

That's right. That's it. It's not power. Right. It's money. It's all money.

[Ed Martin]

It's money. That's exactly right. So just quickly, I mean, I'm interested as a former resident, longtime resident, about the city of Washington over which you would have had jurisdiction as his chief law enforcement officer. Because it's not a state, but it's a federal zone. It's super complicated set up in D.C. but what were you starting to do to make the city safer and more orderly and what needs to be done?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, this is really important and I hope I was actually nobody cares because.

[Ed Martin]

It'S a majority black city, by the way. It's like all the liberals who are like, I love black people, they just don't care.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, they don't seem to. I agree with you.

[Ed Martin]

They don't.

[Tucker Carlson]

They. All right, so there's a couple things. One is, and I was just telling Judge Janine Pirro, she's really, she's really kind of.

[Ed Martin]

I should have said the headline, which is.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, she's kind of into it. She's kind of, she's really into it and she's asking me all these questions and I'm thinking she was.

[Ed Martin]

She's the nominee now.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, she's going to be. Well, she's going to come in and serve like I did. She's going to serve right away. So she's not waiting. And, and that's very cool, but I'm a fan of that because why have this, you know, inter. So DC is awesome. I mean, it's awesome place as, you know, history on every corner. You know, the background of everybody. I did these ride alongs with detectives and I'd still go every corner of the place and you see all these different things and, and, and the people. People are people, right? Of course they want what they want, want more for their kids and more for themselves. And I lived, I'm from St. Louis and in St. Louis, always lived in the city itself and it feels the same way. A couple things. One is the violent crime, right. The, the guns are. Because Virginia's hard on guns and Maryland and, and, and DC are soft. Then you can get away with having guns.

[Ed Martin]

Misuse of guns.

[Tucker Carlson]

Misuse of guns. Right. So all sorts of people with all sorts of guns.

[Ed Martin]

But can I ask, though, just. So D.C. and Maryland have a lot of gun control. Correct. But when criminals use guns, they're more tolerant. Virginia has less gun control, but is tougher on the illegal. What is that?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I mean, that's the. That's. That's. That's the whole thing, right? That's the. That's the game. You can't. You can barely get your concealed carry in D.C. it takes months and months and months.

[Ed Martin]

I got one.

[Tucker Carlson]

I know. It takes forever, though. You probably. I. I brought somebody in the other day. I said, tell me how the concealed carry process is going. They said it takes six months to get an appointment to even get your stuff.

[Ed Martin]

So I can get you one immediately. Can I say one thing about D.C. which is why it's a great city. You. When you live in D.C. it was there most of my life. Mad because it's so inefficient. It's totally third world in the way it's run. And then you finally realize, like, wait a second. If I just play along. Grease a Palmer, too, all the right people show respect, you know, Mr. Mrs. Always. Stuff like that. Like, life is easy in D.C. yeah.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, it's like living not for normal, not for regular people.

[Ed Martin]

Like, for people. No, it's not even about. It's like, you know, like, why would I. My kids don't have driver's licenses, so I could go through the whole rigamarole, or I could just pay someone 400 bucks to get them a driver's license, and you can. Boom. You get driver's license.

[Tucker Carlson]

All right, well, that's good. Okay. Okay. I don't know what to say to that, except corrupt. Let me go back. Let me go back to what they need. They need. They need. They need to stay focused on the violence. Right? So the violence is guns and. And, you know, look, Cash has given us support to try to do some cold case stuff. The FBI has. Has the ability to do more DNA testing to try to get, you know, a lot of cold case stuff is. Is DNA. And if you can go back and look at stuff, rapes especially, and you can do. So there's lots you can do.

[Ed Martin]

So There was a DNC employee shot to death in 2016 in. In Washington, but not robbed. And we're not, like, allowed to talk about or even mention his name. So I won't mention his name. But people I know who worked at the dnc, one person at the time believed that he. There was a political killing, that he was murdered for political reasons. Will that case be looked at, do you think?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I got briefed on it. It's now a while ago, time wise, but there's not a statute of limitations on it. But it's cold. To your point. It's a cold case. There's not, there's not.

[Ed Martin]

Do you think there's any evidence that that was an assassination, not a robbery? Debris?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, there's evidence that there was a killing in such a way that. Yeah. I mean that you could say you can't know sort of why the killing happened. Right.

[Ed Martin]

Weird, right?

[Tucker Carlson]

It was weird, yeah. Yeah.

[Ed Martin]

So that guy was killed and in D.C. but MPD was taken off the case and FBI took over. Why?

[Tucker Carlson]

I don't know the answer. It's a good question.

[Ed Martin]

Kind of weird though, right?

[Tucker Carlson]

Like, how many days do I have left on the job? I'll go find out. I'll see if I can find.

[Ed Martin]

Sorry, sorry.

[Tucker Carlson]

Things I should have asked. But what I want to tell you about this is important because it's, it's. You're going to see it nationwide this summer. And that's the problem with juveniles in all these cities where you have Democrats and liberals in charge, they're soft on juveniles. So the juveniles get away with crimes and tougher and tougher, harder and harder crimes, carjackings, you know, and worse. And so if that's the system, it's happened over and over now. And the, and of course the community that they are in has a lot of, you know, the schools are bad, had not a lot of role models. Right. Life is not in a good spot. And you churn this, you've got this situation. I said to someone, there was a incident down at the Navy Pier, a Navy Yard where someone was a bunch of kids, juveniles come in these gangs and they, and they steal wallets and they get around people. And I said, it's a friend of mine. He said, oh yeah, the Navy Pier is like that. And I said, what are you talking about? It's Navy Yard. He said, the same thing happens in Chicago. In other words, every urban city has this problem of juveniles. And the reason why is because we continue to send them back and to keep them in this system that's just so broken.

[Ed Martin]

But you can't shoot them when they come up to you and do this.

[Tucker Carlson]

No, course that's right. Exactly. No, it's a disaster.

[Ed Martin]

You can't defend yourself. Right.

[Tucker Carlson]

It's a disaster. But I think one of the things that that juvenile question is one that D.C. has to face because it's really. And the older kids, if, if it were, if they were girls, they'd be calling it trafficking because the older boys are trafficking the younger boys because they know they won't get into trouble the same way because they're underage. So that part of it is a disaster. And that falls right on the D.C. city Council and the mayor and, and the current administration there that hasn't, hasn't taken it seriously because you just need to lock them up. You get, you need to get them out of D.C. put them in someplace you could pay to put him in another, you know, reform school or whatever to get him out of town. Instead, they let him, they let him loose. They, they, they don't.

[Ed Martin]

Congress could fix that in a day. They could, because they have constitutional authority.

[Tucker Carlson]

Over the district if they wanted to.

[Ed Martin]

And Newt, for whatever you think of Newt Gingrich, when he took over in 94, he took over D.C. and, and made it a much better city and created this massive renaissance.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right, Right.

[Ed Martin]

That's right. Why do you, why do you think they don't.

[Tucker Carlson]

I. Look, I mean, that's. You're asking too many questions about the Republican Party. I mean, you're right. And the President, I think, is frustrated by the dynamic. I think he wishes that there was more action in terms of taking it over, but that's not been a priority.

[Ed Martin]

Yeah, no, I get. I mean, I think it's fair. I mean, there are a lot of things going on. Yeah, I wish they would do that. You probably heard about eight sleep. Lots of people are talking about it. It is a company with one mission, improving your sleep. And it's changing the way people do that, the way they get a good night's rest. We just got word that their team is launching a new product. It's called the Pod 5. It's an original and innovative mattress cover, plus a blanket that uses precision temperature control to regulate your body's sleep cycles and give you the perfect sleep, which really, really matters. It can range all the way from 55 to degrees to 110 degrees, meaning that you're covered no matter what. It's like electric blanket to the next level, but also a cooling blanket, so it makes you sleep better. Temperature has a massive effect on the way you sleep, by the way. It also detects snoring.

[Tucker Carlson]

And then it.

[Ed Martin]

Adjusts your bed position to reduce or completely stop it. So there are a lot of ladies in America who are going to be grateful for this product. Product. Everybody who works here will tell you, because they all use it, that there's no better way to be alert, productive and happy than by sleeping well. And 8 Sleep really does help. Visit eightsleep.com tucker use the code tucker to get 350 bucks off your pod 5 Ultra. If you don't like it, you return it within a month. That won't happen. We think you'll love it. But you can if you want. 8 sleep.comtucker Can I just press you a little bit on the question I asked before because I think it's interesting. Why so people who are for gun control tell us that guns are dangerous and bad. Okay. And I disagree. I think guns are a tool. They can be misused, whatever, like a chainsaw or a steak knife. But there's those exact same People don't seem as concerned when guns are used in crimes. They're only concerned when guns are like under your bed or in your gun safe. They're concerned when law abiding people have guns, not when criminals have guns. What is that?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I mean, part of me wants to engage in some philosophical argument with you about what they think, but I mostly think it's what you said earlier. So this is a really, they don't really, yeah, they don't really care about these people. I mean, I'm the Republican, I'm the conservative, I'm supposed to not care. They say you don't care about these people. People. When I get in this job, I look at and say poor people, mostly black and brown are living through hell because of the policies that you have, which is to let bad guys go with guns. You and I both would agree if you're a bad, if you do something with a gun badly, you know, you're, then you should be incarcerated. Definitely no problem.

[Ed Martin]

Because guns can kill you quickly.

[Tucker Carlson]

So I wish I could say it was a philosophical thing. It's that they really don't care about these people. They, they don't mind letting the people suffer and letting their communities, you know, get, get destroyed. And the rest of it is just window dressing. I, I, there's no other trying to read people's minds. It doesn't work.

[Ed Martin]

DC is the only significant city that Republicans could really run through the Congress and through the U.S. attorney's job. So I, I feel like the only shot the city has at reform. And in the last 50 years since it's had home rule, the only time it's gotten better is when Republicans take control. And so I just like you to fill out a little bit. Like what, now you're leaving? But what do you think should happen from the U.S. attorney's office in D.C.

[Tucker Carlson]

In D.C. well, we started on guns and then we're going to switch. We're going to switch, keep moving towards other violent crime. Now the key pivot in this again is down the weeds a little bit is to take these gun crimes and then down to rape and assault and go down even to property crimes because you can't have CVs have everything behind lock and key. Right. But the two things that we're doing is dragging these cases to federal federal court because the local court is so bad, the juries are bad, the judges are bad, the system is bad. So you get them to federal court, you got a better chance to have real penalties and a bit more stability. But the problem really is going to be whether you can have the will of the judges to hold these people to the laws. Right. And, and to put them away, but that you move along that continuum every single day on. In terms of addressing crime. The last thing I'd say is that a lot of talk about money. You know, the mayor wants to do a, build a stadium and all these things. They need more cops. And cops cost money. But cops also require that you be on their side. Right. Remember when we were kids, being an FBI agent was a big deal. Being a cop was a big deal for sure. And now young people don't feel drawn to those jobs. Right. So it is hard to get cops. MPD is down probably. I think their ideal is 3800 cops. They're at about 3300. You can say you're going to get all these crimes. You still got to go get cops. And you got to find a way to get people into the system that can be on the streets and doing it for. So if you give me my wish list for DC to make it better in the next two or three years, it's continue to actually take real crimes and put them in federal court and then bolster the number of cops. And you can bolster the number of cops as a US Attorney just by having their back. Right. There's something called the Lewis List, which is what happens if you go to court and you're a cop and somebody claims you lied. They can put you on what's called a Lewis list, which is a requirement that the prosecutors tell a defendant that this guy testifying has had a problem in the past of credibility. But it's a abused by the, the judges and the, and the, and the public defenders to hurt the cops. Well, I, I said we're gonna stick up for the cops and we're going to try to change that. So you got to stick up for the cops in lots of concrete ways that make the system work. But, but you've mostly just got to get after the crime every in systematically. Not hard. You know, Rudy, and these famous prosecutors, they, they did one thing well. They consistently prosecuted crime. They didn't come up with social plans. They didn't come just get a crime, crime, put him in jail, get a crime.

[Ed Martin]

Swift and certain punishment.

[Tucker Carlson]

You know, Metro just changed their rules in the city, in the district. The Metro, you know, both the buses and the, and the Metro, the trains that you can get banned from the trains, because once you get banned from the trains or banned from Metro, I can then arrest you for a different charge. Could be a felony for coming back in on a ban between before, between. Before that you could go every day. You could do three felonies, three misdemeanors a day. You could expose yourself in the morning, jump a fair thing in the afternoon, and, and, you know, whatever. And so Metro got serious and they were changing the dynamic that's just plain getting the crimes down and focused on it. And, but you got to want to do it. You got to want to do it every day.

[Ed Martin]

We have to care.

[Tucker Carlson]

Care. Well, that's the word. The same thing. Yeah.

[Ed Martin]

So what, what other cold cases are you looking at?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, the big one that I was interested in is the, is the, the number of times that you can take DNA that was left behind. Those are a lot of sexual assault, rape and sex. Sexual assault. So those are the most obvious ones. There's some DNA cases on guns. If you, if a, if a weapon on a crime has some DNA on it, as this technology's got more sophisticated. But you can instantly go and, and, and using the databases now and technology, get a check on DNA from a lot of.

[Ed Martin]

Why has no one done that?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, they are. It's just, it's a process. It takes a lot of. It takes a lot of time. I mean, one of the things you're doing is not everybody's in the database, so you're trying to track back through. But we are doing it. I mean, that's one.

[Ed Martin]

A lot of people are in the database.

[Tucker Carlson]

A lot of people are in the database, but not, not everybody. Everybody. I mean, and, and so one of the. Well, and so the FBI has been good about. I don't know why they were doing. Weren't doing it before, but the FBI has been great about letting us do it. And so we're, you know, we're tracking that down.

[Ed Martin]

Can I ask you a question? The members of Congress, and it wasn't just Thom Tillis, I don't mean to keep beating up on poor Tom Tillis, an idiot anyway, but, but like all members of Congress on both sides, where they're very threatened by J6, that's one of the reasons, you know, it was their building, not the people's house, that belonged to them.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right.

[Ed Martin]

And they felt like their space was invaded. They felt their security was jeopardized. I get it. But aren't they concerned that there are, like, murders taking place within walking distance of their office? I mean, do they care about crime in D.C. did anyone mention that?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, again, you know, Tucker, and look, I think President Trump is like this, how he approaches everything. And I mean, that's how I wanted to serve, and I do. We did exactly what you're saying. We said to everybody on the Hill, Hill come to a briefing on, on safety. We want to keep you safe because the staffers care. Right. The staffers are getting you assaulted and all. And so, and people, and people, people came to that and people want to hear how we're going to do that, how we can prosecute how. Because law enforcement, again, is partly prosecuting, but it's a lot of showing up and showing force so people know you're safer. And yeah, I mean, look, I, I, I think they care. The question is whether it leads to policy, you know, and, and again, my, my job as prosecutor in that office is to get after the crimes as I've got them. And if they're not going to adjust their policies, I can't worry about that on the days, you know, day to day of getting after crime. But I'll tell you what, when I go to, you know, Anacostia or I go to these neighborhoods, they care and they, and they know the U.S. attorney is, is paying attention to that. And that's probably more important than the folks up on the Hill.

[Ed Martin]

I, I think, I think it is. Tell us what you did with Wikipedia and why.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, you know, the, one of the aspects of, you know, weaponization is what we're talking, what I've been talking about, the new, the new role I've been on, Weaponization Working Group, is when you.

[Ed Martin]

Weaponization of the legal system.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, weaponization of the legal system, but really the weapon, weaponization of the law, the use of the law to, to hide and, and operate. So Wikipedia has this incredible 501C3, right? Gets a tax benefit. The people, it's a public benefit corporation. You know, the 1950s they looked at this closely because the Rockefeller foundation, the Carnegie foundation had been using their foundations and abusing it. And that's when the law first changed to have 501C3 become a tax code. It was part of the, the shift, right? So the, the Cox report or the Reese Committee or whatever it was. But so we have this problem where these, these, Wikipedia has all this money that they use because they're a 501C3, a non profit that's supposed to be for the public benefit benefit.

[Ed Martin]

Do they, how much, how much do they pay a year in tax?

[Tucker Carlson]

I don't even know. No, I don't, I don't know the numbers.

[Ed Martin]

No, they pay no taxes.

[Tucker Carlson]

I'm not sure if they pay zero, but they probably say they pay payroll and other things. They have an answer to that. But they, they would be tax exempt under the, under the code. But more importantly, they're obviously biased. They're obviously, and they're anti Semitic is the big one, but they're obviously biased in all sorts of other ways. In fact, as soon as I started taking them on, my Wikipedia page went even worse to hell, you know, in terms of people coming on and editing it, supposedly citizen editors. So, so there's, there's bias again. Information war, right? There's bias here that is against we the people, in my opinion. But certainly it's bias that's hidden from us because they're hiding behind the law. In other words, they're using the law in a way that is weaponized against certain groups and individuals. And so that's what we basically said to, to Wikipedia is, hey, let's look closely at what you're doing and how it's operating and see who's benefiting or not benefiting and paying a price. And by the way, as soon as this happens, they get panicked because they know, know we know. There's another reason I wrote to a number of the medical journals and I said, you guys are all 501c3. You get big benefits from tax exempt status. How are you balancing, you know, the partisan nature of the work you're doing? How are you abiding by the laws that say that you're not supposed to be picking sides or paid for by one donor or the other? And they lose their mind because no one's supposed to ask. You know, you're not supposed to ask like, it's like USAID we weren't supposed to ask until this, this last six months, why are we spending $400 million in wherever. Right. Why is this? You're not allowed to ask. So that's a part of this weaponization thing that I think is underrated. And with Wikipedia got a huge reaction.

[Ed Martin]

Wikipedia is, is history now. I mean, it's how people understand the past.

[Tucker Carlson]

That's right.

[Ed Martin]

It's in league with Google. So it's the, it's the first result on everything. Every noun you punch in gets Wikipedia first. So people, people, like, don't understand anything that's happened in the world prior to last week except through Wikipedia. So if it's totally distorted, then you change the collective memory.

[Tucker Carlson]

I know, but we're back, right? Again. We started. We're back to the information war, Right? It's a war over information. And if nobody, you tell me who. Well, let me say it this way. A prosecutor saying that about Wikipedia is vastly different than Tucker Carlson saying it.

[Ed Martin]

Well, I agree with that. Right.

[Tucker Carlson]

And so. And that's the point.

[Ed Martin]

I wish I was a prosecutor.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, right, exactly. And that's why Donald Trump. Trump, and in my estimation, said to guys like me, go and do this, because that's the role is not just to find the right guy to prosecute. We got to do that, too. If it, if it rises to that, it's to make clear how off kilter the information battle is. Because the public doesn't know that. Right. They don't have that sense of what's so one.

[Ed Martin]

I mean, Wikipedia is a propaganda operation, and one of its founders told me that, that the CIA or the American intel community is heavily involved in shaping the message on Wikipedia. Did you come across evidence of that?

[Tucker Carlson]

Not yet, but that just started that, that, that and that sort of opening salvo was about three weeks ago. So Judge Jeanine will have that one on her plate. But you know, where I'm going, the job I'm going to. I don't have to leave any of that stuff behind. So I can tell you, I thought you were going to go a different direction. And I'll, I'll say on the weaponization working group, as it's described by Attorney General Bondi and the President's Director Direction Intelligence Community is one of the groups that was weaponized against the people. Obviously, it's obvious. The question is, how are we going to get to the bottom of it? Right. How are we going to get to the bottom of some of the weaponization of the government intelligence community against the citizens? And that's what? That's where I'm going now.

[Ed Martin]

But we can't tell you. It's classified.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I think it. Tell me. I'm now in. I'm now in the. I'm now in the system. Well, we'll see if I can get, you know, but again, the point of getting.

[Ed Martin]

See if you can get what?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, the point of getting into these positions as a prosecutor is I'm now getting the, the clearances to be able to get to. To the, to the, to the level where you can look at some. I know that still try not to tell you, but that's the point of, of this fight is you cannot win the information battle based on what they let you see. It's what you have to find. Even in our government.

[Ed Martin]

Especially in our government. And I, And I have to say the classification regimen does not seem primarily focused on protecting national security. Dirty at all.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right, exactly. Back to weaponization. The 51 guys that signed the letter on the Hunter Biden laptop.

[Ed Martin]

Yeah.

[Tucker Carlson]

You'd have to be a fool to think that's an isolated incident. In other words, if they're willing to misuse and mischaracterize a letter based on their, you know, their status and the advantage that they have as insiders, that's not the only time they did it.

[Ed Martin]

No, exactly.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right. And so the question is, how endemic is the weaponization? Right. And we both know the answer. This is. Back to your point, it's much, much worse than we think. The question is, how do we continually go about getting to the bottom of it? I'll probably get myself in trouble. You intro. Who knows? One of the ways I ran elections, one of the places I think that is really problematic, that nobody has looked at is the certification of systems. Right. The certification of election systems. Systems. For the record, not saying there's any fraud, but how do you certify there's fraud? Well, I know, but the election.

[Ed Martin]

What's at stake?

[Tucker Carlson]

Exactly. Well, no, no, but even better, look at how much money it is.

[Ed Martin]

That's what we're saying.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right. Okay, but even just The Election Assistance Commission is the entity that certifies machines. Okay. It has no real teeth, but it controls who's certified or not, which means it controls who has the Good Housekeeping stamp of approval worth hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars. Dollars. What are the chances that that has been done? Everything else we've seen in. In government is broken, corrupt, messy, incompetent or something. Right. What are the chances that's the one place where it's Totally competent and totally without any flaws. I'm just saying, let's go look. Right. And, and, and, and that's what we've got to do to get to the bottom of this.

[Ed Martin]

In the same way that the gun control people are fine with gang bangers having guns.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right, right.

[Ed Martin]

The democracy is sacred. People are very upset. When you want to make sure that elections have integrity. That's weird.

[Tucker Carlson]

I love when you do this Tucker move. It's weird. It's weird. Only if you impute good intentions to these people. Right, That's. It is weird then.

[Ed Martin]

No, you're right.

[Tucker Carlson]

It's totally predictable. I mean, of course. And all around the world, by the way, they're watching this happen. You know, Poland right now, they're in the midst of, they're trying to take Poland out. Obama is in Poland. There's an election in a week. Of course Obama's in Poland. I had a whistleblower.

[Ed Martin]

Why do you think that is? I know I had a whistleblower, Sikorski and Apple bomb's husband.

[Tucker Carlson]

I had a whistleblower come into my office and they were telling me the story that every couple of months Samantha Powers would arrive with USAID money to this, this country. I won't say which one. And I said, you guys know who Samantha Powers? Of course we do. She was arriving with the money and she was. And they knew it was a, you know, sort of the beginnings of a, of a, you know, color revolution. It's not lost on the world. Right? It's not at all lost. The qu Again, the question is, are we going to get all of it out? Are we going to name it and then hold some people accountable? People say, are you going to walk people out in cuffs right now? I, I, I'd be happy to have just people know their names. Right. I like the cuffs later if they commit a crime. But right now people don't even know their names. And the question is whether we can even get through the information storm that we're in in to get that out.

[Ed Martin]

Well, I mean, the early returns are not good. I mean, John F. Kennedy was murdered 62 years ago and we, and the executive order from the president was January 23, two days after his inauguration. And we still do not have thousands of Kennedy assassination related documents. No one wants to say that I voted for Trump. I love Trump. But like, what the hell is that?

[Tucker Carlson]

That's not on my doc. No, I got it.

[Ed Martin]

But it's like, I know it's the classification laws. Make it. Well, don't make it, by the way, I mean you can just rule by fiat, which I think someone needs to do immediately, but like just classify, you know, release the documents or go into prison. How's that? But you can't even get 62 year old documents released months after a presidential executive order. Like that's how hard it is to fight these classification rules.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, and, and back to say it again, that's the big one. You can see how many are you not. That's it.

[Ed Martin]

That's exactly right.

[Tucker Carlson]

That's right. That's what, that's what I'm saying. This is not, this is still David versus Goliath and that's the lowest stakes.

[Ed Martin]

Of all because no one connected is still alive.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right, Right. Yeah. It's not, it's not, it's not crossed by a hurricane, which, you know.

[Ed Martin]

No, it's not 9 11.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right.

[Ed Martin]

It's not the 2020 election. It's not covet.

[Tucker Carlson]

Right.

[Ed Martin]

Yeah.

[Tucker Carlson]

To say. Right.

[Ed Martin]

So, I mean, how many people in your experience so far, DOJ have your mindset?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, most of the ones I work with, I, I come out of the, I mostly work with Dag Off Dag's office. You know, that's Blanche and Emil Bove and some of those guys. Those guys, when they turned the lights on, on, on the inauguration day, there was only a handful of us there. And those folks are, are in the.

[Ed Martin]

Mindset we're talking about, DOJ people think of.

[Tucker Carlson]

Oh no, no, they're, they're, they're mostly scared. I mean they're mostly scared and nervous and if they're, if they're, if they're left leaning or, or establishment and don't want a part of it, that, that's one thing. But most of them are just, you know, they've seen this go on to on. Right. Our side doesn't win ever. So you're not going to have people betting with the side that never wins. Right. They're not like, they're not like, oh, my career will be better if I go with those guys this time. They're like, I did that for a minute back in, you know, 1985 and it didn't work out well. Right. So no, that's, that's the, that's the problem.

[Ed Martin]

No, it's so true. It's so true. How corrupt was Merrick Garland, do you think?

[Tucker Carlson]

Oh, I, I mean the only thing that makes me think it wasn't worse than you can even imagine is he has a bit of a Biden, Joe Biden kind of mentality there Was everything going around him and he wasn't checked in, it seems like to me. You know, I'm not saying he was mentally off. I'm saying he was. He was a caretaker, and Lisa Monaco and others were running everything. So. And when, you know, he was more. Maybe. Maybe I'm being too generous. He may have been more clueless than. Than willful.

[Ed Martin]

I'm not surprised.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, but like.

[Ed Martin]

Like Mueller was that way, too, I think.

[Tucker Carlson]

Oh, 100 guaranteed. Yeah. And when history is written, you know, and I tend to write a whole bunch of it, Tucker. So when it's written, you know, you watch this. It accelerated under Obama. Right. It used to be politicized, I think, and now it's weaponized. That's the pivot that went on. Right. It used to be politicized. Somebody's advantage or not Bill Clinton. I think maybe I'm being too generous. He was. He was sort of politicizing things. It got weaponized where they're destroying people, putting people in jail, trying to kill them. Remember Obama joking about, I'm good at killing people. Right. There was a. There was a sense of sort of. Of. Of real disrespect for humanity. That kicked in.

[Ed Martin]

Yes.

[Tucker Carlson]

And it. And it kicked in and drove through that. That's what Biden. The Biden term is something we were. We barely escaped, in my opinion, in terms of that. That idea and that destruction of citizens against humanity.

[Ed Martin]

I completely agree. I completely. What happened to Lisa Martin Monaco?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, I think she's at a big law firm. I think I probably. I think I wrote to her. I wrote to her letter and said, what's going on? We want to check on things, you know. Yeah, she's at a big law firm. She's cycling out. It's all the same, you know, Andrew Weissman, Lisa Monaco, they. They all go. Lisa Monaco went to NYU recently, gave a speech, probably got paid for it, you know. You know, remember the Vindmans? Vindman got a job, the one in Congress. He got a job at Georgetown for 100 grand. He didn't teach, but he was some sort of fellow or something. Again, back to Georgetown. This is just a cycle there where they're all very well paid and they talk to each other and then they get ready for the next. Next, you know, effort. Norm Eisen or whoever tells him this is the next way we're going. And so, you know, I think the. The good news is we do have on our side the truth, and we just got to keep fighting for it. And, you know, so we're not positive.

[Ed Martin]

If cryptocurrency is the future of finance but we do know that what we have now is broken and dangerous. Debt has never been higher in this country. Many of our so called leaders are getting rich serving you. It's a scary scam. So where does it go? Well, thankfully there are options. Donald Trump has said repeatedly he wants the United States to be the crypto capital of the world. He's already created the Crypto Advisory Council and recently signed an executive order to establish a bitcoin strategic reserve. This could give normal people an alternative to the government's failing system and frankly to the US dollar. I'm not saying put all your money outside the US dollar but like don't be crazy, don't be stupid. Here you can see where it's going, going. So the people at iTrust Capital can help you get in to this. It's complicated for people who aren't following it. They make it easy. They're based 100% in the United States of America. We looked into this. They service only American investors and they operate the only platform that allows you to buy and sell crypto 247 both inside and outside of your tax advantaged IRA. And it all happens on one easy to use dashboard. They also operate a closed loop system. Meaning, meaning that bad actors can't access your account and steal your money. So if you're considering adding Bitcoin if you want to or some other cryptocurrency or portfolio, iTrust can be trusted and it's easy to understand iTrustCapital.com or click the link below. So what's on your doc? What's on your everything? Slated priorities?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, Attorney General Bondi, when we started the group she was, she gave us some real straight marching on Jackson Smith, what he did which is unbelievable. Unbelievable. If you. Anyway, the Catholics that were targeted, remember the Richmond memo? How did that happen? J6 is another one. There's a, one of her charges on the working group was whistleblowers. The whistleblowers that were targeted. You know you talk about weaponization Tucker. Remember they, they the guy that's in jail up and I think is it West Virginia? He, he supposedly Lone Ranger, he stole all the tax returns and he leaked Trump Trump's, remember he leaked Trump's but nobody paid attention. He also leaked four or five or 600 or maybe a little more of the wealthiest people in America, mostly conservatives. I know it's funny how that happened. And then a whole bunch of small businesses, mostly conservative and I Got a briefing on that. And I said, this guy acted alone. He didn't tell anyone. And they're like, oh, yeah. He's like, Snowden. I'm like, are you joking? Are you really telling me? He's like, somehow he's like the Snowden of IRS tax, you know, I said, because this was weaponized, remember? It was, it was. It was ProPublica that first he went to New York Times, then He went to ProPublica, which was going hammer and tongs, one after another against all these people, again, weaponizing American law against citizens. So it's. That's a bit of a digression. But to say the whistleblowers in the IRS and other places that came forward have been targeted under the Biden administration. So that's another thing that Bondi SS do. School boards all across the country. When they targeted school board parents, that's. That's another focus for us to look at. So. But we'll also be looking at, as I said, the intelligence community and broader. Right. We've got Crossfire. Hurricane is still a big deal. Obviously, getting to the bottom of that. They end up overlapping a lot, as you know, but there's a lot to do. A lot to do.

[Ed Martin]

When are we going to see the Epstein stuff we were promised?

[Tucker Carlson]

That's another one. I'm not where I am right now. I'm not.

[Ed Martin]

You're not diving right in depth, Epstein?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, no, I'm happy. I'm happy to. I'm happy to help in any way I can. I haven't been in on that. I've not been on that matter.

[Ed Martin]

Now, do you think the Attorney General Barr promised investigation. Epstein's death in federal custody in Manhattan. We never got the results of that. Do you. Is there some way for the public to petition? Like, whatever happened to that?

[Tucker Carlson]

I don't think there's a way for the public to petition, but I think as you ask about it, people will respond. I guess. I don't. I never saw that. If there was a.

[Ed Martin]

No, it was never. They never did the investigation.

[Tucker Carlson]

Oh, they didn't even do it.

[Ed Martin]

I don't think they did. No.

[Tucker Carlson]

Oh, that's the first I've heard of it. I don't know. Again, I know that when I got into office, I wanted to talk about the pipe bomb and find out more about the pipe bomb. I also want somebody to. I'm going to get to the bottom of some of the. January 6th. Remember the. The gallows? The fake gallows were built. They're built by five guys Who I'm. You can see them on video all over the place. Iconic image used to destroy America around the world. That somehow this was a gallows with a, with a, a noose. Total fraud. Total fraud.

[Ed Martin]

What happened to those guys?

[Tucker Carlson]

I don't know. We never found them. We never found them.

[Ed Martin]

We never found those guys. In an age of facial recognition, we just can't find those guys.

[Tucker Carlson]

And those guys can't find those guys.

[Ed Martin]

The pipe bomb question is a really interesting one. And the only reason I think most of us know much about it is a guy called Darren Beatty who now works at the State Department, thank God, but who reported on it extensively on Revolver News. But that was so baffling and remains baffling because those bombs, whether they're real or not, were outside the two party headquarters on Capitol Hill, RNC and dnc. So you think, like politicians would really want to know why the conspicuous incuriosity about that?

[Tucker Carlson]

I'm with Darren. I mean, I, Before I was in office, I kept saying, how can this possibly be? If you go to any other part of the world and you say the two major political parties had bombs put by their front door, it'd be the, It'd be the story forever. Right? Sounds like, you know, just before World War II started, there were bombs placed somewhere, right? I mean, in front of the party parties. So I, I've never understood either. And the bombs were, you know, they were sort of rudimentary, but they clearly were. Somebody knew what they were doing for the. Look, I mean, again, it's information. It was an information. Whatever it is, it became an, a piece of information or a play over information that we haven't gotten to the bottom of. And, but everyone's sort of like, yeah.

[Ed Martin]

Whatever, the pipe bombs outside the party, it's. It, you know, whatever. We've got more important things to worry about, really.

[Tucker Carlson]

Yeah, yeah, we'll get, we'll get, get there.

[Ed Martin]

Will we ever know what happened in the 2020 election? The numbers were weird.

[Tucker Carlson]

I thought, well, not just the numbers, all. Everything about characteristics of, of all of the election. And then there was the admissions that the election was fortified. It was intentionally planned to do that in, in, in such a way to get results that looked off. Now, does that mean they cheated? We don't have that smoking gun, but we certainly have over and over and over again aspects of things that didn' We've never had the answers on it. So yes, we will get to the bottom of it. Again, this is the point about the, about information. You cannot move ahead if you don't actually know what happened. And clearly, clearly the mainstream media and the elites told us, you have to shut up. You're not allowed to talk about that. Right. It's insane.

[Ed Martin]

Oh, I remember.

[Tucker Carlson]

We remember it well. And then January 6th was used, in my opinion, to try to shut off the conversation even more. Right. And so. But I do think we'll get to the bottom of it.

[Ed Martin]

No, I played video that was from the US Senate given to me by the US Government and everyone at Fox News was mad at me for playing the video. It's like, why? Really? I thought we were a news company. No, I, I remember that very, very well. Do you think that we will see people held accountable?

[Tucker Carlson]

Yes.

[Ed Martin]

For this?

[Tucker Carlson]

Okay. Yes, yes, yes. I mean, I wish, I wish it was fast, faster. I feel the same frustration. Right. Getting people arrested faster and prosecuted faster. You know, I wish it was fast. We're 120 days in, 115 days in. And where I sit, I can tell you I was there pushing on key issues. I'm in the middle of a bunch of them. Judge Deneen will keep them going. It's harder than you think to move fast enough. I agree with all that. But there will be accountability. There will be. The truth will be known. People will be accountable. And as importantly, by the way, people that have been damaged, damaged will be healed. They will be given the either pardons like the president's done for a lot of people, or other things. I think, you know, we have a, we have a set of people that are, that have been targeted by the government that deserve to be helped, and that's going to be part of this. Guaranteed. By the way, that did make a mad. I will say this. People ask me in all my interviews that Senate, they said, are you for reparations? I said, hey, that's a stupid term, right? That was used about. But I am for when somebody gets wronged and destroyed by their government, that they be taken care of. That they, they try to make them whole insofar as they can. That's only fair. By the way, that's not Strock and, and Paige getting a million dollar payout, which is what they got, by the way. That's another form of weaponization of government. When you have Biden administration and Strock and Page transferring wealth to each other based on an agreement that's complete, completely, completely inappropriate, on what basis do they.

[Ed Martin]

Get a million dollar settlement?

[Tucker Carlson]

They sued because they were hurt about how, how the, their texts were released to the public. And then the Biden administration Text released.

[Ed Martin]

The public gave me a million dollars.

[Tucker Carlson]

Maybe give me, give me, oh no, give us a call. But, but so, so getting to the bottom of that kind of stuff, that kind of conduct is another part of this thing. So it's, but it will, it almost feels like it can never end because it's so, you know, the weaponization against the citizens began a long time ago, but we really started to see it under Biden and they, they, they accelerated. See it, you can see the memos, you know, Merrick Garland and target the Catholics. Right. And, and go after the school boards and, and, and Jack Smith. Jack Smith took, he used a grand jury in D.C. which is famously, you know, favorable, favorable to the Democrats to do almost all of his work. And then he flew down to Florida and basically transferred it down there. For lawyers, this is like unheard of stuff. And everybody goes, oh yeah, you know, Letitia James. And these, the way the, the conduct happens. And people go, oh yeah. You know, by the way, one, one thing too, Tucker, to preview the lawyers, the bar associations and the targeting of lawyers is another way that they've weaponized government against people. You know, they, they, you know, you can say what you want about Rudy or something. We've never had the system weaponized against lawyers for doing their jobs right. It's never been like that. Again. It's, it's indication of something wrong. Wrong with. Why are you so upset about the election?

[Ed Martin]

There's a reason. Exactly.

[Tucker Carlson]

But also it's, it's also inappropriate as a matter of public policy. Those Organizations are all 501C3s. They're all protected by law. They're all basically monopolies. Right. So they're, so you're sitting here where you got the DC Bar disciplinary council is basically doing Dick Durbin's bidding. Every time Dick Durbin says something, he opens a complaint against me. He'll do it against Judge Janine. And you're like a second, this is not the system that we're supposed to have. So that's another one that's weapon govern. The weaponization of the law against the citizens to the detriment of the country.

[Ed Martin]

I've known a number of smart, high testosterone, reform minded people who come to D.C. to make things better, who get destroyed.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, right. You've been reading the Washington Post.

[Ed Martin]

You know, I haven't been, I haven't read it in years.

[Tucker Carlson]

Okay.

[Ed Martin]

But I've just seen this happen to a lot of people. So, I mean, just on the basis what you said over the last hour, I think you're going to be the target for, you know, a lot of efforts to destroy you.

[Tucker Carlson]

It's been going on, though, for a while. I mean, maybe, I mean, look, Phyllis Schlafly, for whom I worked, there's this famous exchange where she's given a speech and she says, Clarence Thomas said to her, how do you keep going, Phyllis? You know, she said, how do you keep. He said, and she, she said, there's a, there's a prayer. She says, you know, and she would always say, from the malignant enemy, defend me. It's one of the Catholic prayers, you know. And, you know, I, look, we're so blessed. You know, this. You have the same attitude to be in this country, to have so many opportunities and people deserve, our families deserve to have a future. And so this is the fight that we're in. And you know, I, they, they've said terrible things for about a month. My wife doesn't watch the tv, which is great. Doesn't read the papers, thank God. My kids do a little bit now, and they're not quite as convinced that I'm as, as good a guy as, as I told them I was before. But no, no, it's, it's a, it's a battle. It's a, it's a fight for the future. And, and so some of us are going to take a bit of a beating and we'll keep going.

[Ed Martin]

You wonder where this is going. I mean, if Obama weaponized the government against people who didn't vote for him and Joe Biden brought it to the next level and just threw hundreds and principles prison, what's the next Democratic administration going to look like?

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, that's, that's fair. I thought you're going to say something different. You know, the one thing I tell people all the time is one of the reasons you have to care to de. Escalate the rhetoric is it is leading, you can see it's leading to, I mean, people are spitting on me on the sidewalk, right? This is not, this is not normal behavior.

[Ed Martin]

And Mr. May, she knew who you were. Well, I know that tells you a lot.

[Tucker Carlson]

Well, that's a yes.

[Ed Martin]

I mean, I knew you were, but I, because I follow this stuff.

[Tucker Carlson]

But like, but I think that the, it's, it can lead to when, when the, when people start to lose power. You see the desperation, right? You see the, and, and to me, that's what, that, that's the one thing you start to notice. And so, yes, it could be really terrible on a Democrat administration. Imagine, you know, what it's like for, you know, President Rahm Emanuel when he puts in, you know, Attorney General, I don't know, Adam Schiff and what the heck, that's life. It feels like we've gone to the bottom and maybe, you know, finish a thought that I had earlier that I didn't get to finish, which is it feels like a lot of people that were good people before, you know, 100 years ago, again, back to the 100 years ago, good people just had good morals, cared about each other, fight, fight, fight. But be honorable on the same side. That doesn't seem as common right now, right. That there's some people that really are not good people, people that are just disagreeing. They're really not good people. And that's dangerous, right? That feels. You can feel that sometimes. And I think that's a worry. But it's something that we have to live with and work through and pray about and try to build the community about to see.

[Ed Martin]

Ed Martin, I really appreciate all of this.

[Tucker Carlson]

Great to be with you.

[Ed Martin]

Thank you very much.

[Tucker Carlson]

Thank you.

[Ed Martin]

We want to thank you for watching us on Spotify, a company that we use every day. We know the people who run it, good people. While you're here, do us a favor. Hit, follow and tap the bell so you never miss an episode. We have real conversations, news things that actually matter. Telling the truth, always. You will not miss it if you follow us on Spotify and hit the bell. We appreciate it. Thanks for watching.