Jack (46:08)
Think everybody massive story, exasperated about this because they remember not just the rioting or the racial discord over past incidents, but they have a memory. We go back to Tawana Brawley supposedly raped or treated badly by an innocent and that was all a fake that Al Sharpton never really accounted for, atoned for. They remember the Duke lacrosse people that were destroyed by that and all the Duke faculty that championed the so called stripper who then shot her boyfriend and confessed that she had made that all up. They remember the Covington kids and the Native American Vietnam veteran who was not a Vietnam veteran and had prompted that whole confrontation. And the Covington kids were successful in court at least the prime person was. They remember George Floyd and they remember tragedy that he died, but they don't remember that he was a career felon, that he put a gun into a woman's pregnant stomach and a home invasion, that he'd been stopped for the same thing a year before. He was high on fentanyl. He had a record that he, had he not been trying to traffic counterfeit currency, he would have never been stopped. Had he not resisted arrest and just said, you know, officer, I'm going to get into the car and just got into the car, he would have been fine. If he had not been on fentanyl, he would have been alive. I think that doesn't excuse necessarily the behavior, but even that where it was cloudy about whether that was an accepted practice and what degree his knee was on it. They remember George Zimmerman and they remember the white Hispanic label so that the media could turn that into white on black when it was a Hispanic man and a black man, young person. They remember the photoshopped picture that made his real injuries look cosmetically okay because they didn't want the idea that poor Trevon pounded the guy's head. They remember Michael Ford and they remember all of the CNN and MSN people walking out of the studio shouting hands up, don't shoot. They remember that that was found to be completely made up. So my point is that there were not anything like this on the other side. They were all concocted or there were circumstances in the case of George Floyd that didn't warrant him having angel wings and a halo, as you saw in murals. But this thing could have just been isolated, if it was isolated between a black man and a white man. And there are people in the left who saying that's what it was about originally. And somebody said that he used a racial expletive. Somebody said well no, he was spit on and pushed the guy back and then the guy doesn't matter. That's a one on one encounter. But what we're talking about are all these people, a dozen or so who then jumped in. And there were three things that bothered people about the videos. One was by and large all of the black attackers were young. And two, all of the people who were their victims were middle aged. Three, in some cases a woman was sucker punched, knocked down. Four, when these people hit the pavement, people then body slammed themselves on top of them. They kicked their head, they were trying to kill them when they were defenseless. Number five, women jumped in and were just as culpable as men hitting a woman on the ground. And males six, there was glee in the background while people were high fiving and cheering this on. And so we'll see the mayor, the vice mayor I think was culpable. And she said to the well this is just, you know, a private fight and I don't think it's going to work this time. I really don't think they're going to work. People are going to say if the roles are reversed this would been a riot by now. And the FBI, it's not going to work because Harmet Dillon is the head of the civil rights thing and she's going to watch this. And it's very clear from that video there's a racial component to it and they're Going to watch that. And two, three. We're at the end of the DEI era. What do I mean by that? I think we've gone as far as we can by identity politics. So we are 70% white, 30% non white, and we're all trying to identify at least the 30% in some tribal fashion. I am speaking as a Latino, speaking as a black, I'm Asian, I'm this, I'm that, I'm gay, I'm trans. It doesn't work. Look at India, multiracial democracy, Brazil. It doesn't work when you have caste and tribal rivalries and dissension. So once you go down that tribal path and you say that you're not responsible for your behavior because critical legal theory, critical racial theory says you steal a pair of sneakers, that's only against the law because rich white people don't have to steal sneakers. So when I steal it in the San Francisco store, it's not shoplifting. Or I can say this and that about you, and I can say white this and white this and white this because I'm victimized. We're 60 years into the civil rights movement and affirmative action. We got two generations of people who grew up under affirmative action, dei, et cetera. So they're not aware of the immediate systemic racism. And I know people say it still exists, but it doesn't in the way that it did. And the idea that you're going to say that you are a protected group of people and you're not going to be accountable for your behavior in the way that other people are, it doesn't work anymore. So if you're Stanford University and you're listening to this and you have the audacity to put on your website three years in a row that you let in 9% white males when they make up about 34% of the demographic, that doesn't work anymore. Or you're going to call your graduation an affinity graduation ceremony. Oh, it's not racist because it's 99% targeted at one race because they can go to the regular. Try that with European graduates. Oh, we're going to have a European American affinity that would last about 1 nanosecond. And you say, well, that's the majority. No, in California, so called European Americans are a minority. It doesn't work. And theme houses are segregated dorms and safe spaces are segregated spaces. And the hyphenation salad bowl approach did not work. And what it did is it gave exemption for certain groups to feel that they would not be subject to, to the Full force of the law. And it trickles down. It really does. Once you say to somebody, I'm going to let you into this university on the basis of your race. Somebody's going to say, well, why did you let them in? On the basis, oh, because they have suffered, their grandfather suffered. Or we think there's systemic racism or insidious racism. Oh, so then you're going to drop standards, give them special preferences. Then the person next on the economic, well, how about me, I'm not going to go to college, but I need to get special preferences. And then the person below that, I need special. And it filters down that you will not be subject to the full force of the law because of your race or tribe or gender or sexual orientation. It doesn't work. And so what they need to do is they don't need to single these people out. They just need to say, who is this woman who kicked this man in the head? Who is this guy who tried to rifle through this guy's wallet? Who's this guy who body slammed him? Who are these people? Eight, ten, you're gonna be charged with felony assault and in some cases attempt to commit murder. That's all it was when they tried to kick a person in the head.
