Loading summary
Anthony Pompliano
According to the brothers Trump and of course, literally everybody at the bitcoin conference. Bitcoin is going to the moon with targets of a million dollars across the board. But that is the main story of the day, the bitcoin conference. But we've still got a lot to unpack from this week, especially because I've been off at the bitcoin conference and haven't been able to do shows and cover everything that's been happening. Luckily, we have NLW who's always on top of the biggest stories here for the Friday 5. Let's go. Let's do, let's do. I have a rule that I will only stay in Vegas for one night. I broke that rule. I stayed for three nights. Most people were staying for four to seven nights. And they are all absolutely insane because Vegas is nuts. You could not have chosen a crazier place to have a bitcoin conference. You weren't there, were you?
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
No, no, no, no, no. I've done my tours of duty at this. But it looked good from afar.
Anthony Pompliano
It was. And it's strange, just the irony of it. And I said this on a recording that we put out. But having a bitcoin conference where everybody's telling you never sell hold forever, low time preference. Think about your children 50ft from a casino where the same people go out and start rolling dice and playing stupid games like I did, called double down blackjack. I don't even know what it is, but, you know, we played. The irony is just so thick. Hilarious, you know?
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, I love it.
Anthony Pompliano
Don't waste your money. Go to the casino on the way out of the conference.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, well, allocate a very specific portion of your money to, to waste is a. Is another way to come out of it.
Anthony Pompliano
Your, your, your entertainment budget for the bitcoin conference. You know, I guess if you're listening to Club 11 in Miami, it' What.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
What I was going to say is if you're. If. If your worst transgression in Vegas was staying at the double down blackjack table just a little too long, you probably escaped.
Anthony Pompliano
Okay. This game is absolutely absurd, though. But I, I won't get into it, but it was, it was a good time anyways. Let's talk about the bitcoin conference. I think obviously the, the biggest story there was J.D. vance speaking. Right. Regardless of what he said, the fact that he spoke, I think was, was the real key. But he says the US should use bitcoin as an advantage in rivalry with China. Crypto finally has a champion in the white House during the bitcoin conference speech. You know, I'm not sure if everybody heard it, but J.D. vance spoke, and people were very excited about his words. To me, it felt a little bit like he just kind of took the best, most viral parts of Trump speech from last year and borrowed them. Like, he said, we're going to fire Gary Gensler. People like Gary Gensler, if you remember last year, Trump said it twice because it was so popular, but very clear that J.D. vance gets it. And it was, I think, a big signal that he was willing to show up and give this speech.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, I mean, I think to me it read a little bit like, you know, certainly there's. There's the administration line that he's reinforcing, and that's a part of it. But, you know, J.D. vance was interested in bitcoin before. Before it became sort of part of the Trump administration agenda. And it felt to me like he was positioning himself as not just sort of a transactional friend, but actually interested in this. He took a very populous tone with it. You know, is bitcoin as a tool against sort of, you know, the elites and power and all those sort of things? You know, he basically said it was a hedge against transgressions of power no matter who's in office, you know, which is at least lip service to the idea that it's not sort of a partisan thing. So, you know, I think that the. The tonality was a little bit different and less transactional perhaps, than. Than. Than some political speeches, what we've seen. And also I think sort of on a personal level, you know, he was also calling on this community to continue to stay engaged. It was sort of a not so subtle political rallying sort of speech as well, basically saying, you know, we. We continue to not be able to ignore politics because politics is not going to ignore this industry.
Anthony Pompliano
Did you have any other huge takeaways from the conference from what you saw? Obviously, both Trump brothers spoke, as I alluded to before, you know, bitcoin's going to the moon. They kind of, you know, reiterated the same points. That was all great, but, man, the lineup was absolutely insane. So there really were a lot of key moments.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
I think that what. So, interestingly, I was at a TD securities like, conference in New York yesterday, speaking, and. And we were talking a little bit about crypto and crypto being back. And, you know, or. Or like everyone's presumption was, or bitcoin at least is back. And I think that sort of, you know, the bitcoin event Having such sort of big headline presence was very reminiscent or reflective of where we are. You know, this cycle really is a bitcoin cycle so far. Doesn't mean that it'll stay that way forever. You know, there's. There's certainly sort of themes that are emerging. Stablecoins are obviously a big theme. You know, we constantly talk about what. What other narratives there are. But, you know, the. The fact that there was so much energy and attention anchored at the bitcoin conference, even though there are discussions of other things I think is notable. Right. That's where the energy is right now, is sort of the. The mainstreaming of. Of this particular asset. I will say one thing that's not all that encouraging if you're sort of in the industry is like, David Sachs gave us absolutely squat. Nothing in terms of, you know, actually, you know, new. New ideas, new policies moving forward. I mean, you know, I think some people were hoping that we'd get some sort of, you know, interesting update on the bsr, given that we've had deadlines from those executive orders pass, and there was just stone nothing around that other than sort of some lip service to the idea that it's still a relevant thing.
Anthony Pompliano
We don't even have an audit on the United States government's bitcoin holdings.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah. Yeah. So a little less encouraging.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah. My biggest takeaways, I think, from being at the conference, obviously, anecdotally, is, you know, if you went to Bitcoin Miami in 2021, it was like the crypto trading degenerates partying at clubs, and it was like being at Coachella. You were there, it was at the Miami Convention Center. It was absolute insanity this time. It was a lot of suits in a good way. And everyone I spoke to was like, my age or older. This was not at all young people. This was family men with their kids and their wives. And it was just, we've grown up. And to me, like, regardless of what was said on stage, that was really kind of the single and the most noticeable takeaway that I had.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Interesting. Yeah, no, I mean that that reflects sort of the. The substance of stuff that was coming out from the outside, you know. But look, you know, I think it'll be interesting to compare and contrast. We've got another massive event in Permissionless, you know, just by sheer numbers coming up at the end of this month. So, you know, and my presumption would be that that will be a little more, you know, it slanted more sort of diverse sets of. Of crypto folks, not just Bitcoin, you know, they're pretty self consciously trying to have it be a bigger tent. So, you know, it'll be interesting to see how those themes, you know, is it that same crowd just in, you know, a different location or, you know, is. Does another part of the industry show up for that?
Anthony Pompliano
I think it'll be somewhere in between. But I think because you're allowed to say things about altcoins at Permissionless, it'll probably have a bit of a different audience. Right. I mean, this is really kind of bitcoin only focused. Even if you remember in 2021 as much, the joke was always that you could say bitcoin on stage, you couldn't ever say Ethereum on stage, but you could go like, look at a booth for an NFT project on the convention floor. Now it's bitcoin miners and bitcoin companies down there and much more serious. There really isn't just, you know, no mascots running around and none of the kind of hype and strange things, really. It felt more like a tradfi conference to some degree in that way.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Interesting. Yep.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah, it was great. So obviously one of the bigger things that happened during this week while everyone was at the conference, Trump media to raise 2.5 billion to invest in bitcoin. This was kind of interesting because it was reported they were raising $3 billion and then Trump came out and said they're idiots and the people they listen to are even dumber. Right. And this wasn't true. And then of course, a day later, it was 2.5 billion to invest in bitcoin. So I guess it was just leaked a little too early. And I guess along Those same lines, GameStop stock price continues sinking but they bought 512 million versus Bitcoin that was announced. There's actually quite a few of these that went unnoticed, I think. One huge one that nobody's talking about. Not a company, Pakistan, to have a strategic bitcoin reserve. Right. So I guess all of this in the frame of a lot of people, a lot of institutions, a lot of sovereigns actively buying bitcoin. And then the focus on Trump and the Democrats obviously pushing back against his involvement in the industry, as you can see here, how Donald Trump's crypto dealings push the bounds of corruption. So I guess we can start with the Trump Organization buying bitcoin, then talk about the implications of that and then just casually, you know, have a conversation about companies buying bitcoin in general.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, I mean, I think that the, well, one, you know, the sailorification of. Of everything is, you know, sort of clearly a big dominant theme. You know, we talked about it, I think, either last week or the week before, you know, you're getting a louder set of people asking questions around, you know, how good it is. I think one of the things that's interesting is a lot of the sort of layer one analysis of how it could all go wrong, especially if it looks at micro strategy, tends to sort of come up short. Right. Because Taylor's very smart and good at this, and he structured his, you know, debt really well. And so it's unlikely that he's, you know, that he's going to sort of face, you know, crushing liquidity cascades and things like that. However, I've seen a number of people put point out this week that while we don't know exactly the terms of all these deals, it's almost for sure that they're not getting the type of terms that Sailor is getting. Right. They're not able to control this in the same way. And so, you know, it is new risk being piled into this system. So that's. That's a growing conversation. I don't know if there's anything to say about it other than just, I.
Anthony Pompliano
Have a lot to say about it, but.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
I'm gonna let you finish. No, but I think. I think that's. That's. That is so sort of like, you know, a big part of the theme outside of the Trump. Let's. Let's pause there and talk about it for a minute.
Anthony Pompliano
My biggest takeaway, outside of what I saw at the conference, and I wanted to save it for this part, is that we now know exactly what the next bubble is and exactly how we're going to completely fuck this up in this cycle. And it is Bitcoin, treasury companies. And there's 99% certainty in my mind that that's the case. It is insane. Within four hours of being at the conference floor, I was pitched literally 25 of these. And I saw the terms that people have gotten to participate in these. And this is the ICO shitcoin cycle of the past, repeated on public markets with tradable stocks. And it's absolutely gonna blow up. It has to. I'm not saying MicroStrategy will blow up. I'm not saying Nakamoto or any of the responsible ones now will blow up. But I'm saying exactly what you are is that the terms are gonna get worse and worse. They're gonna push, just like the Voyagers and the Celsiuses and the Block Buys of the past. Oh, you got 7% yield. We need to give our customers 8% yield. Oh, your node has 8% yield. We need to do 10% yield. And then bitcoin's going to drop and they're going to start having to sell this off and it's going to cause a liquidation cascade tale as old as time. I had one person who I love and respect and these people are all going to make a ton of money on it. Pitch me six of these. Six. They were in six personally within a week. Right. And so people who have participated in these, most of the early investors are already up 25, 30x on their investments. And you got to remember, this isn't like ICOs of the past. To some degree, you would get, you know, you invest and you'd get slowly over time, like a lot of these guys. This is a reverse merger with a company that's already publicly traded and they're sitting on the stock. And listen, for better or for worse, if you had the opportunity, you would take those bets because it's great. But there's no way that this doesn't unwind horribly at some point in this cycle.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, well, it's interesting because you also have people like Adam Beck saying that we can absorb a hundred trillion. Bitcoin can absorb 100 trillion of this demand. You know, so it's like even the, a lot of the bitcoin champions are also, you know, sort of encouraging, encouraging it as it stands now. That said, there's also a lot of, let's call it a diversity of opinion here, Right. This is not a sort of universal. Everyone's cheering for it. With bitcoin, there are lot of questions, but, you know, animal spirits take over and the questions get drowned out.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah, I mean, I actually we posted like a random live macro Monday yesterday on this channel and we didn't have McGlone, but we had James Lavish and Dave Weisberger. And I asked them flat to their face, like, what do you think of this? Because I know James Runs is a partner in the Bitcoin Opportunity Fund and I knew for a fact that they're participating in a lot of this, right? And he said, listen, we're going to leave a ton of money on the table. Like the minute that they're too overvalued, we're selling them. But this is the opportunity right now we have a fiduciary duty to take advantage of it. We have access, but shared the same concerns long term. So even the people who are participating to some degree, very Responsibly know that there's going to be a time when the music stops with these things. My biggest concern, you're going to get 100 of these at the top, right? Like if bitcoin is going to be at 150 or 175, I want to make it clear I don't think that this bubble pops today at 105. But as the FOMO goes up and people realize there's not the same kind of money to be made in altcoins and VC and that narrative is kind of passing, this is going to be the new version of that. I definitely learned that a lot of people who purport themselves to be bitcoin maximalists all made their money in those ICOs and shitcoins quietly. And this is a new way to do that. But there will be a time when 100 hedge funds come in at the top and try to do this. Or they'll say they're treasury companies, but really larping and we'll be like hedge funds and they're going to structurally do it wrong. They're going to have some idiot running it and they're going to have to sell a ton of bitcoin. I asked Jack Mellers about it too, actually, and he was like, good. He was like. Because we'll be the responsible ones who are buying bitcoin at a 50% discount. So even those who are bullish on these think that there'll be a big drawdown to buy and it'll be yet another weak hands to strong hands transfer. But I'm concerned.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, yeah. I put that firmly in the category of things that we are now actively watching and checking in on week over week. I think at this point, I mean, we, we have officially hit the point where there's too many of these announced or sort of, you know, who have made buys to really capture them all. Even with a daily show, I'm finding it like they're, I'm. I'm watching them roll off the list of things that I actually cover, you know.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah, well, I'm definitely here for any company that would rather be holding bitcoin than cash. Beyond that, if you're financially engineering a way to get more bitcoin, it's somewhat a replication of stock buybacks and all the issues that we've seen in the traditional financial system. But you know what? If they can secure the bag and not kill the market somehow, I'm here for it.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah. I mean, if one of the things that our function is with the financial system is to push the boundaries far enough to figure out where the fault lines are. So, you know, here we go again.
Anthony Pompliano
Let's quickly, before we move on to the next topic, I don't want to miss the Trump Organization's participation here, raising 2.5 billion to buy Bitcoin. And then, of course, the criticism from the Democrat side and others.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, I mean, look, I think that the, you know, the, the challenge here is there's a lot of things that are, you know, I think that I absolutely take them at face value when they say they're true believers. That was a big part of the sort of Don Jr. And, and Eric's, you know, speech this week was just confirming that this is not, you know, they're, they're all in on this. They have been for a while. But it's. It's very clear this is sort of a natural thing for them to do. This isn't surprising at all. In fact, it's, you know, this is exactly the type of, kind of financial engineering that, you know, these organizations tend to like. So that. That doesn't surprise me at all. They're in a position to do it. You know, I think it does add fuel to the, to the fire, obviously, for Dems, as everything will. But I think that the meme coin is where a lot of the focus is right now from Democrats. You know, you're seeing, I'm noticing a lot more connecting the dots between meme coin purchases and pardons. And, you know, maybe it's just the occasion of this dinner that they had, you know, a week ago or whatever it was, but I'm seeing that start to pop up, you know, Instagram stories from normie friends who aren't, you know, connected to crypto at all. And it feels like that's where sort of like the story is hitting the mainstream a little bit.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah, we talked about Saylor, obviously. I think consensus is that Saylor's safe, but that doesn't secure, keep him safe from criticism because he had a big one this week. Michael Saylor calls on chain proof of reserves a bad idea. Rules it out for strategy over security concerns. This was all while we were at the conference. I didn't get to dig too deeply into it. I did see. I believe that Arkham actually went ahead and found and doxed the addresses anyways. But big head scratcher for a lot that Saylor was not willing to be transparent about their proof of reserves and their wallet addresses.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Look, I like Saylor, but every six months or so, he reminds you that he doesn't give a fuck about like the, you know, the, the community. He can talk the game all he wants. He is here for a specific purpose. He's a absolute mercenary and he's not going to play by crypto community rules just because they're norms. Like he's going to do exactly what is good for him. And again this, literally every six months there's some new thing where he says something that's completely out of sync with, with what sort of bitcoiners believe and they have to sort of pause and reevaluate and then where they always get is like, you know what, whatever we don't, we don't require. Usually what has happened is that, that they don't require 100%, you know, alignment with, with someone to sort of still consider them on the same team. But you know, for a lot of people this is a big one. And the logic I don't think is super resonating with people. You know, it's, it's especially when you have like, you know, bitwise who's etf, they've been able to sort of, you know, share this type of information without it being a big concern and stuff. There's just enough counter examples that it just doesn't super hold, hold muster but you know, it's, I can't imagine that this won't blow over. You know, Saylor's going to do.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah, I get that everybody's upset about it and like I said, I didn't really pay much attention. This was one of those less, less signal than noise situations. But do people really believe that because he's not sharing them, that there's some sort of fraud and they don't hold the bitcoin like what, what are they, what's the real concern? What are they worried about? That just I think transparent, like.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, I think the concern is that the industry has spent a lot of time trying to sort of normalize proof of reserves as just a thing that you do for exchanges for other big players. And so to have the person who's sort of like arguably the most influential in the field right now just crap all over that and not only say that he's not going to do it, but that it's genuinely a bad idea, it creates cloud cover for everyone else not to do it. You know, he basically like if you dig in like some of the more offensive parts of the, of the comments are like, you know, basically saying that the problem with you know, things like FTX wasn't proof of reserves. It was like I Don't know what he said. Like something like, you know, don't work with little offshore tweakers or some. Something like that. You know, like a clever catchphrase, but a complete deflection from, like, transparency norms that the industry has started to, you know, rally around. So he does do damage to the normalization of proof of reserves as a. As a sort of standard thing for a leading actor to just sort of not again, not only not do it, but to publicly crap all over it.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah, that all makes perfect sense. Let's move on to stablecoins, because that was another huge thing on the docket throughout the week generally. But I think the biggest story in that space, obviously is that circle seeking $624 million in their IPO. Obviously, that's not the value of the IPO, that's how much they're looking to raise. And of course, to follow that up, BlackRock maybe going to be buying about 10% of that. Some other big names obviously looking to participate. And all of this while stories are still circulating that Coinbase and Ripple are trying to buy Circle.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, man, this is, this is just. I have no idea at this point what's likely to happen with Circle. Every. Every couple days we turn around and, you know, where it's pointed is headed in a different direction, which makes me think that they, they're playing all, all kind of angles right now, you know, and seeing, seeing where it lands.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah. Do you. We obviously don't know what's going to happen here, but I think that this is indicative of how much incredible demand there is for companies like this. I mean, generally for companies in crypto to go public, but also, I think to grab a piece of the stablecoin market as legislation heats up. Maybe we should talk just very briefly about where Genius is at and what the odds are of that passing.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, I mean, look, I. I think that Circle has been right at the center of two sometimes conflicting forces. Force. One is political machinations. Right. Like when the political fortunes of the Genius act and some of the specifics around the Genius act have been more in question circles. You know, the. The appeal of the IPO has been sort of lower, but then you have sort of this countervailing force of the interest in the IPO market feels like it changes, is incredibly quick shifting. Right. Etoro was a surprise, but then everyone sort of is like now geared up and I think people are prepared or trying to seize extremely small IPO windows. Right. I think that, like, people feel like there may be a window right now but that it could be a very, very short one. And so you have sort of this extra concentration of demand. I mean, look, you know, sidelong this news, we also got news that the big banks in the US were like planning a stablecoin consortium. Right. So yeah, Circle's gonna have ridiculous competition, you know, so they, they gotta, they gotta either, they gotta position themselves in some way, either gear up with more money to compete or you know, kind of land in a home that's got bigger resources. So I don't know, it's, it's, they are a really interesting bellwether right now of everything that's going on kind of at a high level in the industry.
Anthony Pompliano
We're going to go full lord of the flies with stablecoins in the United States in the coming years. It's going to be wild. Because listen, we've already seen sort of shots across the bow publicly between Circle and Tether. Now we obviously have Tether being finally they have their proof of reserves from Cantor Fitzgerald as we know, but Howard Lutnick and Cantor Fitzgerald being partial owners and obviously Tether now a part of 21 with Jack Mullers and SoftBank and Cantor Fitzgerald just getting more of, I think a stamp of a brand approval in the United States. Circle looking to come online as a public company and then all of these banks trying to compete with that directly, all in the context of wondering what will be allowed from the Genius act or whatever Stablecoin legislation passes. Everybody is going to stablecoin their faces off in the next few years. It's going to be Bitcoin, treasury companies and stable coins. That's what we're going to be doing.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Absolutely. Stablecoins have this incredibly strong product market fit. The narrative has made them by investing in stable coins. You're also investing in America now is sort of the way that the narrative is resolved. So from so many different angles. There's going to be a ton of energy around it.
Anthony Pompliano
I know that those were all of our topics. Someone said, why aren't you guys talking about why is the market dumping and not going up like it's supposed to? It's not supposed to do anything. But literally, I'm not going to say this is the reason, but I can't recall a time when bitcoin went up during a bitcoin conference.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, it's a rule. It used to be consensus. Now it's just a rule for any, any big conference. It has to go down.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah. Anybody who would be buying is playing double down blackjack.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, I don't know, I don't know if the four year cycle still exists, but I'm pretty sure that the conference rule still still exists. So, you know, I wouldn't worry about it until it keeps going down for a week after this.
Anthony Pompliano
Yeah, I'm not concerned about $105,000 Bitcoin personally.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, no. But I actually, I am a bit.
Anthony Pompliano
Concerned about altcoins though. Listen, I think we will have our altcoin seasons. Things will go crazy. But I'm telling you that is not where the pumpers and dumpers and the extractors are looking right now. Those things go up and down because of the huge VC money and all the people that have been participating in them. Those people want bitcoin related things right now.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah, yeah, I, I don't know. I just doing a quick search of, of, of various channels to see if there's any like, you know, specific catalysts. But look, we continue to have, you know, every other story is sending a different signal when it comes to tariffs and trade. And so there's sort of that, that general background volatility, you know, which just, you know, it means one step forward, one step back pretty constantly.
Anthony Pompliano
So you know, also just a reminder at Liberation Day when all of the market uncertainty really kicked In, Bitcoin was $82,000. It's now 105,000.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Yeah.
Anthony Pompliano
So if you're wondering about when it was supposed to go up, that's a time it probably was supposed to go down and it's up, up big. So I would not worry about bitcoin at the moment at all. That's all the stories that we have for you guys. Give NLW a follow and of course check out the breakdown and we will be back next Friday for the Friday 5. Thanks man.
NLW (Nathaniel Whittemore)
Later guys.
Anthony Pompliano
Have a great weekend. That's dope. Let's go.
Podcast Summary: "Bitcoin To The Moon: Wall Street’s Bitcoin FOMO Begins"
Release Date: May 30, 2025
Host: Scott Melker (The Wolf Of All Streets)
In the episode titled “Bitcoin To The Moon: Wall Street’s Bitcoin FOMO Begins,” host Scott Melker delves into the latest developments from the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, exploring institutional interest, political maneuvers, and the evolving landscape of Bitcoin and stablecoins. Joined by Nathaniel Whittemore (NLW), the conversation unpacks key moments, insights, and potential future trends in the cryptocurrency space.
The Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas marked a significant shift in the crypto community, showcasing a more mature and professional environment compared to previous years.
Anthony Pompliano shares his personal experience:
“I have a rule that I will only stay in Vegas for one night. I broke that rule. I stayed for three nights. Most people were staying for four to seven nights. And they are all absolutely insane because Vegas is nuts.” (00:01)
Despite the high-energy backdrop of Las Vegas, the conference maintained a serious tone focused on Bitcoin’s future. Pompliano humorously highlights the irony of advocating for long-term Bitcoin holding while being surrounded by casinos:
“Having a bitcoin conference where everybody's telling you never sell hold forever... 50ft from a casino... we played... double down blackjack.” (01:09)
One of the standout moments was J.D. Vance’s speech, which underscored political support for Bitcoin. Vance emphasized using Bitcoin as a strategic advantage against China, signaling a strong endorsement from the White House.
Anthony Pompliano observes:
“J.D. Vance spoke... he says, we're going to fire Gary Gensler... very clear that J.D. vance gets it.” (02:59)
Nathaniel Whittemore (NLW) adds depth to Vance’s stance:
“He was positioning himself as not just a transactional friend, but actually interested in this... a hedge against transgressions of power no matter who's in office.” (03:15)
This alignment with political figures signifies Bitcoin’s growing acceptance and strategic importance in national policy discussions.
The conference highlighted a surge in institutional investments, with major entities like the Trump Organization and other corporations raising substantial funds to invest in Bitcoin.
Pompliano warns of potential bubbles:
“We now know exactly what the next bubble is and exactly how we're going to completely fuck this up in this cycle. It is Bitcoin, treasury companies... it is insane.” (10:30)
He elaborates on the risks, drawing parallels to past ICO cycles:
“It's a reverse merger with a company that's already publicly traded... these terms are gonna push... bitcoin's going to drop and they're going to start having to sell this off...” (11:45)
NLW concurs, expressing concerns about the increasing number of Bitcoin-related financial products:
“There’s too many of these announced or sort of, you know, who have made buys to really capture them all.” (14:45)
A contentious topic discussed was Michael Saylor’s opposition to on-chain proof of reserves, challenging industry transparency norms.
Pompliano highlights the issue:
“Michael Saylor calls on-chain proof of reserves a bad idea... this was a big head scratcher.” (17:16)
NLW critiques Saylor's approach:
“He is here for a specific purpose. He’s an absolute mercenary and he’s not going to play by crypto community rules just because they’re norms.” (19:05)
This stance has sparked debate within the community about the balance between strategic privacy and the need for transparency.
Stablecoins emerged as a focal point, with Circle's IPO and growing competition from traditional financial institutions like BlackRock.
Pompliano discusses Circle’s fundraising efforts:
“Circle seeking $624 million in their IPO... BlackRock maybe going to be buying about 10% of that.” (20:31)
NLW analyzes the competitive landscape:
“Big banks in the US were planning a stablecoin consortium... Circle's gonna have ridiculous competition.” (23:15)
The conversation underscores the intense race to dominate the stablecoin market amid evolving regulations and technological advancements.
The episode concludes with reflections on current market trends and future projections.
Pompliano remains optimistic about Bitcoin's resilience:
“Bitcoin was $82,000. It's now 105,000. So I would not worry about Bitcoin at the moment at all.” (25:09)
However, he raises alarms about the sustainability of current investment strategies:
“There will be a time when 100 hedge funds come in at the top and try to do this... they’re going to have some idiot running it and they’re going to have to sell a ton of bitcoin.” (12:28)
NLW echoes the sentiment, noting continuous market volatility influenced by geopolitical factors:
“Every other story is sending a different signal when it comes to tariffs and trade... one step forward, one step back pretty constantly.” (25:16)
The episode provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and future prospects of Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market. From institutional enthusiasm and political endorsements to emerging risks and competitive pressures in the stablecoin sector, Scott Melker and Nathaniel Whittemore offer insightful analysis into the forces shaping Bitcoin’s trajectory. As Wall Street’s fear of missing out (FOMO) intensifies, the conversation highlights both the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead for the leading cryptocurrency.
Notable Quotes with Timestamps:
Anthony Pompliano (00:01): “Vegas is nuts. You could not have chosen a crazier place to have a bitcoin conference.”
Anthony Pompliano (02:59): “J.D. vance... we’re going to fire Gary Gensler. People like Gary Gensler... very clear that J.D. vance gets it.”
Anthony Pompliano (10:30): “We now know exactly what the next bubble is and exactly how we're going to completely fuck this up... it is Bitcoin, treasury companies.”
Nathaniel Whittemore (19:05): “He is an absolute mercenary and he’s not going to play by crypto community rules just because they’re norms.”
Anthony Pompliano (25:09): “Bitcoin was $82,000. It's now 105,000. So I would not worry about Bitcoin at the moment at all.”