Podcast Summary: "Have America and Israel just started a forever war with Iran?"
The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim
Date: March 4, 2026
Hosts: Yalda Hakim (Sky News) and Richard Engel (NBC)
Location: Live from Jerusalem & Tel Aviv
Episode Overview
This episode discusses the massive escalation in the Middle East following the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, due to US-Israeli airstrikes. Yalda Hakim and Richard Engel analyze the rapid spread of conflict across the region, the resilience of Iran’s leadership and military, shifting US-Israeli objectives, and the potential for the crisis to become a “forever war.” Throughout, they integrate listener questions and first-hand insights from sources across the region, addressing whether regime change is truly possible—and the broader global implications.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. The Outbreak of a Regional War
- [00:19-01:17] The Immediate Aftermath
- Yalda arrives in Jerusalem right after US and Israel begin bombing Iran, describing “non-stop” attacks and Iran’s response with ballistic missiles over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.
- Richard emphasizes, “It’s not like Ukraine or Russia—this war is so spread out, so complex and developing each day.”
- [01:44] Scope of the Conflict
- Conflict isn’t just bilateral; Iran is launching strikes at Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Israel, and more.
- “Iran clearly had a plan… [they] prepared for this moment the entire time since their creation,” says Yalda ([04:43]).
- Much regional infrastructure—energy, airports, luxury hotels—is being targeted, with huge economic fallout.
2. Iran’s Regime Resilience & Calculated Response
- Iran Unraveling?
- Despite leadership decapitation, Iran’s distributed power system has kept it running: “The idea that you would take out the Supreme Leader...and somehow the entire thing would crumble, well, we’ve seen that that was false” (Yalda, [04:43-06:08]).
- Revolutionary Guard had plans for such scenarios, continuing attacks and countering US/Israeli hopes of quick regime collapse.
- Pressure on Gulf States
- Iranian strategy seeks to “put enough pressure on the Gulf states” to force the US and Israel to seek a negotiated end ([06:30]).
- Major regional escalation with the aim to change the calculus in Washington, Tel Aviv, and other allied capitals.
3. Iranian Society: Divided, Yet Unified Under Threat
- Complex Public Sentiment
- Internal rifts exist: frustration with the regime versus a desire to avoid more civilian deaths.
- “When bombs start falling....there is a nationalism which gets created…while this is a divided nation, you will see people rise up and say, we don’t actually want body bags in the streets,” (Yalda, [10:33]).
- Powerful security apparatus (Revolutionary Guard, Basij) keeps dissent in check ruthlessly.
4. Who’s in Charge in Iran?
- New Temporary Leadership
- “A leadership council” of two hardline clerics and President Masoud Pezeshkian runs day-to-day affairs, but Revolutionary Guard operates independently ([11:24]).
- Public celebrations at Ayatollah’s death were rapidly, brutally suppressed.
5. What is America’s Endgame?
- Conflicting US and Israeli Objectives
- Various leaders (Netanyahu, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth) offer shifting justifications:
- “Regime change,” “destroy the missile threat, destroy the Navy, no nukes,” “take out proxies,” “dominate Iran on all fronts” ([13:29-14:48]).
- “[This] is a clear operation…in fact, in 72 hours, we’ve heard them give a number of explanations as to why,” observes Yalda ([14:48]).
- The “mission” seems to lack definitive, long-term clarity, echoing past quagmires.
- Various leaders (Netanyahu, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth) offer shifting justifications:
6. Could This Go Global? “A World at War”
- Fear of Escalation to World War III
- “No discussions with the UN…no discussions with Congress…they’ve gone in there…say[ing] we need to do this because of this existential threat from Iran,” (Yalda, [17:32]).
- Western allies, gun-shy after Iraq and Libya, remain hesitant to fully join or escalate.
- “As much as the United States wants to contain this…and says it’s just three or four days…or weeks…this is how things start to really escalate,” (Yalda, [19:43]).
- “Not World War III, Yalda, but a world at war.” (Richard, [19:43])
7. Lessons from Military History
- Airstrikes Hitting Limits
- Prof. Robert Pape: “This has never worked in over 100 years…when those bombs fall, they inject nationalism into the regime…and essentially fuse the regime and society against the air power attacker.” ([20:10])
- “President Trump is up against the weight of history,” Pape warns.
8. Impact on Ukraine War and Modern Warfare
- Russia and Drones
- Richard notes this conflict may benefit Putin by drawing US resources away from Ukraine ([21:52]).
- US and Israel now fielding low-cost “Lucas” drones, mimicking Iran’s approach: “For the first time…Central Command explicitly mentioned it had learned the lesson from Iran” ([21:52]).
- “Using a million dollar Patriot to shoot down a $50,000 Shahed is insane,” comments a military analyst ([24:18]).
9. The “Forever War”: Mowing the Lawn
- Strategic Futility
- Israeli officials do not expect regime change. Instead, their strategy is “mowing the lawn”—destroy Iranian capability, leave, return again and again as new threats emerge ([24:18]).
- “It is just to have a constant war, to have regime failure. And then when the Iranian government tries to reconstitute, you launch another war and knock it down again,” (Richard, [25:30]).
- Yalda: “It’s kind of Gaza pre-2023…and Lebanon at the moment…[Iran] just becomes another theater.” ([26:01])
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
-
On Iran’s Resilience
"The idea that you would take out the Supreme Leader...and somehow the entire thing would crumble, well, we've seen that that was false."
— Yalda Hakim [04:43] -
On Objective Confusion
“Extraordinary listening to Pete Hegseth say that this is a clear operation…in 72 hours, we’ve heard them give a number of explanations as to why.”
— Yalda Hakim [14:48] -
On Why Regime Change Fails from the Air
“This has never worked in over 100 years…when those bombs fall, they inject nationalism into the regime…and essentially fuse the regime and society against the air power attacker.”
— Prof. Robert Pape, relayed by Yalda [20:10] -
On the Future: Forever War
“It is just to have a constant war, to have regime failure...a series of wars to keep it in a constant state of failure.”
— Richard Engel [25:30] -
On the American Political Process
“No discussions with the UN Security Council…no discussions with Congress. And they’ve gone in there and basically said we need to do this because of this existential threat…”
— Yalda Hakim [17:32] -
On the Cost of Modern Conflict
“Using a million dollar Patriot to shoot down a $50,000 Shahed is insane.”
— Quoted military analyst via Yalda [24:18]
Timestamps for Major Segments
- 00:19-01:17 — Setting the scene: Escalation, travels, missile strikes
- 01:44-03:10 — Scale of the new war and its complexities
- 04:43-06:30 — Can Iran survive without its allies? Stratagems and surprise
- 08:21-10:33 — Divided society: Regime change and popular will
- 11:24-14:48 — Who rules Iran? Shifting power, regime structure
- 13:29-14:48 — US, Israeli motivations: What is the actual objective?
- 16:30-19:48 — Could this go global? Fears of wider war, Western caution
- 20:10-21:23 — Professor Pape’s analysis: Air campaigns and escalation traps
- 21:52-24:18 — Effects on Ukraine, new drone warfare tactics
- 24:18-26:33 — Israeli doctrine: “Mowing the lawn,” forever conflict
- 25:30 — “Constant war…series of wars to keep [Iran] in a constant state of failure.”
Takeaways
- The region faces a fundamentally changed, dangerously open-ended conflict: Despite initial hopes, Iran’s regime is enduring with calculated, wide-ranging escalation. The US and Israel are repeatedly shifting their rationale and strategy.
- “Forever war” is not just rhetoric: Israeli officials describe the conflict as a recurring, cyclical campaign—no longer aiming for regime change but continual decapitation and disruption.
- History repeats, but leadership isn’t listening: Expert analysis highlights that the hope for quick aerial regime change is a costly illusion, yet leaders repeat the cycle.
- Global implications—economic, political, and military—are already cascading: The risk of wider involvement and the strain on Western resolve grows by the day.
For listeners, this episode provides an urgent, sobering dispatch from the Middle East’s newest and most sprawling war—showing not just how the situation developed, but how little control the major players may actually have over its final outcome.
