A (20:30)
Yeah, a couple of things that you jotted my memory about number one, both of these teams and I was at that Knicks Pistons game last week and this really stood out in that game. The Pistons play with a togetherness and a pace in the half court that helps compensate for their shooting issues. They make quick decisions, they cut hard, they pass fast, they're good. Like all of their role players are pretty heady passers. Like even Ron Holland is a decent like connector passer. Javante Green is unselfish. They play an unselfish fast style where the ball and bodies are moving and that sort of makes up for their lack of shooting. And the spurs have really improved as a passing team. Castle's a good passer a very good passer already. Fox, we know Wemby's a good passer. Vassell threw. I mean, Vassell, I think only had. He had four assists last night. He threw some passes in that game where, like, they were doing this thing where he would set a back screen for Wembanyama and to start a lot of possessions, which, like, holy shit, is that a threatening action? Because if you don't help on Wembanyama, he's dunking. If you help too much, Visell can curl around and hit a three and they'll reverse it and have, like, Wembanyama set a backstreet for Bissell, too. And he, on one of those came off. No, it was actually a Visel Wembanyama pick and pop where he drove. Vassell drove to his right. Wembanyama popped. He saw the third defender stunting at Wembanyama and ad libbed and hit that guy. That guy's man cutting to the rim. I think it was Castle. Castle swung it to Fox for a corner three. I'm like, man, that was a good pass by Devin Vasilo. So both of them are good passers. And to your point on Castle, this is the playoffs, and how the playoffs are going to be different. I go back to a game the Grizzlies, back when the Grizzlies are a real team, played against the Spurs a couple of months ago, and I believe Edie may have actually been healthy for that game. It may have been a rare Triple J Ed game. They were like, all right, Harrison Barnes, at that point, you're. You're hitting so many threes that we're. We're not going to do the thing where we hide our center on you and guard Wemby with the wing. And now the spurs have since taken Harrison Barnes out of the starting five and put Champagne in to make that even harder. But what the Grizzlies did was, you know what we're going to do? We're going to put Jaren Jackson Jr. On Stefan Castle, and we're going to go under every screen and dare you to shoot. And you're probably going to make some shots, but we're going to mess with your head a little bit. We're going to take your offense out of rhythm. And you also just may have a cold shooting game. And by the way, if you try to beat us to the spot, like when we go under screens, you're trying to beat a former defensive player of the year who can block a ton of shots. And it threw the spurs off in that game. And I do think both they and the Pistons are going to see more kinds of these gimmicky defenses in the playoffs to sort of leverage whatever shooting issues they have. So let's go there right now because in the lead up to this game, and Bill and I talked about this a little on Sunday, we're now entering the stretch run. And so there's going to be a lot of talk about who's a real contender and who's not. And there's no question that these two teams, if you go by NBA history, do not have the requisite postseason experience that a typical championship team has. And I went back and I looked at every finals team since 2000, so like loosely, the post Jordan era to see like is playoff experience. And let's be clear, the spurs largely have none other than a couple of role players on other teams who have now imported to the spurs. No postseason experience at all. The Pistons have basically one postseason loss to the Knicks last year. Have not won a playoff series together. That's about as minimal as it gets for teams that legitimately think they can make the Finals. So champions is one thing. I went back and I looked at all the Finals teams and I got to tell you, it's actually hard to find a team that made the Finals with this little postseason experience. That said, I'm not that worried for a couple of reasons, but here are the teams that sort of like, if you're looking for analogs, teams that suddenly popped into the Finals and were not like microwave free agency teams. So I'm not counting the 2008 Celtics, the Ray Allen KG team, the first LeBron Heat team, and the first LeBron Cavs team. Those are sort of the microwave veterans. Like all these guys have been here before, super team kind of things. The closest analogs are the 2020 heat, who had guys who had made the playoffs before with the Heat, like young Bam Goran Dragic, but like with a previous iteration of the Heat and then were bad and then suddenly we're in the bubble finals. That was Jimmy Butler's first year with the Heat. The closest one is probably the 2021 Suns who lost in the finals to the Bucks, who went from like nothing to 80 in the bubble but didn't make the playoffs to oh my God, they're in the Finals. That was Chris Paul's first year with the Suns. You can go all the way Back to the 2002 and 2003 Nets, who went from 26 wins to back to Back finals. That's the Jason Kidd trade. So every time we're introducing a major superstar level player into these teams, I actually think, just as a thought exercise, last season's Pacers are kind of interesting because they had one prior year together of playoff experience where they made the conference finals in Pascal Siakam's first like half season with the team. They traded for Siakam and they got the Bucks who were injury riddled, and they got the Knicks who were injury riddled and they beat both of them. And then they were overmatched against the Celtics in a pretty competitive slash short series. So one playoff loss and you can find a couple other teams that had like one year of playoff experience. Like the first LeBron team that made the finals had one year of playoff experience with LeBron. They lost in the second round in 2006. And so you look at all of that together and you're like, boy, there's really no analog for a Spurs team with no playoff experience to make the finals or a Pistons team with one playoff loss to make the finals. I actually, I, I'm not. I think both of these teams can make the Finals. I think the spurs could flat out win the championship. And here's why. To me, the spurs, despite the no experience thing, are, are not far from the archetype of the 2020 Heat, 2021 Suns, 2025 Pacers, who again had a year of playoff experience. Because to me, healthy Wembanyama plus Fox is sort of like the equivalent of just adding a superstar player to your team, like in, in a, in a more traditional way that those teams did. I am a little worried that they have literally zero playoff experience and they're in the west and they, they have this sort of like, I guess Harrison Barnes is just coming off the bench now and Champagne is starting and who's, you know, they're relying on a rookie as their seventh or eighth man in Dylan Harper and another rookie in their 10th man and Carter Bryant, who played four minutes last night. I'm a little worried about that, but I just think Wembanyama is so good. And the teams below them are scuffling in the standings and the team above them in Oklahoma City, who I would pick to be clear to beat the spurs in a playoff series. But the spurs clearly brings something to the table that gives Oklahoma City a little bit of trouble. The Pistons, you know, they have the one year of playoff experience. It was a loss, but it was a tough physical, like, this is what it's like loss. They didn't really wilt under. Nothing scared them about the playoffs. They were a little skittish with turnovers earlier in that next series and they calmed down a little bit. They clearly are like, we want just we'll fight everybody. We're game for anything. Nothing scares us. They're in the east and you know, they are a little different in that they don't have like a major talent import that's happened to them. That would, would sort of in NBA history suggest that's the kind of thing that vaults a team from no playoff series wins to the Finals. But you know, like I there's also a chicken egg thing going on where like, yes, anytime you make the playoffs, your most likely outcome is to lose somewhere in the playoffs because the playoffs are really hard. So of course it's going to be hard to find a team that just gets into the playoffs for the first time and wins. I wouldn't pick either of these teams to win the title. I think the spurs can win the title. I'm not sure the Pistons can, but the experience factor doesn't bother me quite as much as it normally would. All of that said, I think when we talk about playoff experience, we talk about pressure and all these like testy moments. Like, you know, last year, Denver, Oklahoma City. Oklahoma City's down 2:1 in Denver facing a crisis moment. Their offense isn't really working. Denver's in his own. They're not making shots and they need these role players like Kayson, Wallace and Isaiah Joe to step up and make these monster threes under huge pressure. Did it help them that they had been in the playoffs the year before? Probably it did. But there's, there's some of that. Like I don't really worry about Wembanyama and Vesel and Castle. Like those guys seem up for it. I'm more worried about like it's just such a grind physically and mentally to get through four playoff rounds that you be that the wear down factor is real. The level of exhaustion once you start playing every other game is real. So I'm a little worried about it. But it's not a disqualifier for either team. For me making the Finals despite what NBA history says. And it's not even a disqualifier for me for the spurs to win the title. I think the spurs can flat out win the title. I'm not going to pick them. I'm not going to pick them to win the west if the Thunder are healthy. But that's sort of where I stand and I Look through it, it really is hard to find a perfect analog that would say, oh yeah, these guys can look back to this team that made the finals with no experience, but there's, there's enough closeness that I'm not disqualifying either one.