
Loading summary
Podcast Host/Announcer
This episode is brought to you by Grammarly. Here at thinkfast Talk Smart, we create a lot of content from social media posts to newsletters, guest invitations to sponsorship proposals. To help us be more effective and produce high quality content, we rely on Grammarly. Grammarly is the essential AI communication assistant that boosts productivity so you can get more of what you need done faster no matter what or where you're writing. Grammarly helps us be more efficient and strike the right tone for our many messages. I know you'll find it very useful. Let Grammarly take the busy work off your plate so you can focus on high impact work. Download Grammarly for free@Grammarly.com podcast that's Grammarly.com podcast.
Matt Abrahams
Effective leaders, effective communicators focus on clarity, context and character My name is Matt Abrahams and I teach strategic communication at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Welcome to Think Fast Talk Smart, the podcast. Today I am grateful to speak to General Stanley McChrystal. General McChrystal is a retired four star general, former commander of US and international forces in Afghanistan, and a renowned expert on leadership. He is best known for revolutionizing counterterrorism operations and cohesive teams in complex environments. He is a highly successful author with books like Team of Teams and his latest on character choices that define a life.
General Stanley McChrystal
Welcome.
Matt Abrahams
I have been excited for this conversation for a long time. Thank you.
General Stanley McChrystal
Well Matt, thanks for having me. I'm looking forward to it as well.
Matt Abrahams
Excellent. Shall we get started?
General Stanley McChrystal
Please, Gentlemen.
Matt Abrahams
Crystal, I'm a huge admirer of your book Team of Teams and in it you talk about shared consciousness and shared information. What is it that leaders can do to build that shared consciousness? Especially in an environment where we're drowning in emails and slacks, how can we actually come together around a shared point of view?
General Stanley McChrystal
The first thing about sharing information that I found later in my military career is we had natural silos vertically and then we also had the hierarchy creates other boundaries for the flow of information. So information in structures, bureaucracies, think pyramid shaped hierarchies tend to follow carefully prescribed routes, up and down and whatnot, and not across as easily unless it is encouraged and in fact demanded. And so what I found was first you need to change the mindset. In the old days in the military, you never got in trouble for information you didn't share to someone, but you could be criticized if you shared some information that you didn't have approval from your boss or your chain of command. So we tried to flip that on its head and say that you are responsible for Informing other people of things that they need to know. And then you say, how do I know what they need to know? And the answer is, you never really do. So the default needs to be to share and then overshare. In fact, I. I said something when I took over the counterterrorist force, which was a complex community of different organizations. The goal is to have everyone know everything all the time. Now, that's impossible, clearly. But the concept of shared consciousness is we all have a common contextual understanding of what the situation is, what we're trying to do. And then people can make decisions without going and get approval for everything they're going to do, because they have the context, they're informed. And so the biggest thing I found was first change the rules of information sharing, and then more slowly change the culture of information sharing.
Matt Abrahams
So context is critical. And also the approach being that the idea is get all the information to everybody and not worry about the potential negative ramifications of that information.
General Stanley McChrystal
The idea that information is power. You don't want to share information because someone knows that you won't be quite as important. So it becomes very important to break down those hesitations in sharing information. And then there's the last one, which I really see more in civilian business. We don't want to scare the children, so we don't want to tell them that revenue's down or that there are headwinds in the marketplace. The reality is when we leave a vacuum in our teams, they fill it with the darkest ideas available because there are all sorts of information sources out there, many of which are very flawed. So you have to not try to prevent information. You have to compete with information that they're already receiving.
Matt Abrahams
That's a really powerful point, that if you're not communicating, people will find and fill that vacuum on their own. And it might be much worse than what the reality is. I'm curious. I totally appreciate and understand changing the mindset and approach where there are certain things that you've implemented or have seen implemented that really help reinforce it. It's one thing for the leader to say, share everything, so we all have the same information, but a lot of people inherently might not do that. So is it role modeling? Is it rewarding when it's done well? How do you actually get people to do that?
General Stanley McChrystal
I could mention several. The first, of course, is role models. Senior leaders have got to be as transparent as they can. We like to look up at the Sphinx, like CEO, who only pronounces something occasionally. But I found it's Better to over communicate. The second is you've got to set up processes and technologies which allow that. And so nowadays with information technology as omnipresent as it is, we can usually reach everybody almost at any time. We need to leverage that.
Matt Abrahams
So it's really about people. Process and tools are the ways that you actually affect that change. Thank you. You have often worked in very diverse situations with military, government, international partners and local populations. All of these have very different goals, communication styles and cultural norms. How do you adapt to ensure clarity and build trust, especially when you are in very ambiguous and uncertain times.
General Stanley McChrystal
Yeah, Matt, first you have to start out by recognizing it. I remember and I've described this, I'd be in Afghanistan, I'd be meeting with Pashtun elders with a different language than I spoke, a different religion, a different culture. So when I sat with them and talked, it was just absolutely obvious that we had a cultural divide in communicating. And so we were very careful about how we communicated. Then I would meet with people from the U.S. department of State, for example. They speak English. We have a shared culture, a shared religion, all of those things. But actually the cultural divide was huge. And I could be speaking military and thinking that it is being heard with the same kind of understanding that I hope it will, and that wasn't the case. And then vice versa. And sometimes just titles or uniforms or difference in organizations can create this, but we don't seem sensitive to that. And so we walk out of the room and we say, Matt just, he's stupid. He's got a bad attitude. He doesn't listen. When in fact, Matt comes at it from a completely different direction than I do. And we need to appreciate that.
Matt Abrahams
I have certainly been called stupid and unprepared in many situations. But the point you are making is very clear that we have to first appreciate and understand the differences. And sometimes those cultural differences aren't just the things you see on the outside, how somebody looks or where somebody is located. Those cultural differences can be within the same organization. You and your colleagues in the State Department are part of the US Government. So really important to recognize it and then adjust your communication. For sure, all leaders have to give difficult news and challenging information. Maybe it's a failed project, a change in strategy, or even negative feedback. How do you approach giving bad news or challenging news? Is there a structure you use, a way of going about it that you have found helps you to be more successful?
General Stanley McChrystal
Yeah, I think the first is you've got to communicate it as clearly and as quickly as you are capable of doing. There is no real advantage in trying to make it seem not as serious as it is or to sugarcoat it. And so I think you start by saying, okay, I've got some very serious information to pass. Here it is. Now, the other thing, though, occasionally a leader will do that and then want to walk out of the room. Drop the bombshell and want to walk out of the room. Context is very important because if a CEO walks into the company and says, everyone's pay is going to be cut 50%, life's hard, and walks out, you get one response from everybody. If the CEO goes, okay, let me be upfront. Everyone's pay is being cut. Here's why, here's the context, here's the rationale, here's what we're trying to do with it. Now. You got to avoid the temptation to say, and you know it's going to be okay. If you're not sure it's going to be okay. But you can communicate things like, I am committed to this team. We will work through this. If we think back to COVID 19, when it first started, the great thing was uncertainty. And so we had to all communicate with our teammates, who are now geographically distributed, and many of them are sitting in their apartments or at their kitchen table. They don't know if they're still going to have a job. They don't know how to interact. And so we can communicate. Hey, this is serious. We don't know exactly how it's going to play out, but here's what you can count on. I'm going to be committed for your welfare, promise those things that are within your power to promise.
Matt Abrahams
So it sounds to me like three things are really important. One is clarity, being very clear and direct. Second is understanding and appreciating the context and sticking in that context. And then what I also heard you talking about was connection. Really connecting to the people, not just dropping it and running, but connecting the information and the next steps to the individuals. And I think those three steps of clarity, context, and connection are really important for any communication, let alone that's challenging. I'd like to follow up on this Covid situation that you mentioned, because that fundamentally changed the way we communicated. We were all remote and distanced. How have you dealt with leading and communicating when you're doing it through a screen, when not everybody is in the same room? What best practices do you employ to help you be effective and continue to connect and build trust with those you're leading?
General Stanley McChrystal
Yeah, let me start, Matt. I actually had a head Start on this, because in the counterterrorist force, starting in 2003, my force was spread across 76 bases in 27 countries. And we were just at the beginning of secure video teleconferencing. And so that's how we communicated essentially all the time. Now, I learned a number of things. I learned first that it's not nearly as effective as we want to believe it is. It's not like being in the room. And so the first is you try to build up, whenever you have the opportunity, relationships, usually in person, that you can then build and communicate later. So if you and I had a real close personal relationship, we could then do virtual things at a much higher level of effectiveness than if we didn't know each other. So you're building upon a foundation. The next thing is, communication, particularly between different ranks in an organization, can be fraught. So, for example, I would communicate with very junior people, and I was commanding general, and they would come on the screen, and clearly they are terrified because they've never spoken to someone that senior before. And I tried to first say, hello, Susan, how are you? And in many cases, they go, how does he know my name? Well, the answer is, I had a cheat sheet because I knew that was important to do that. And then when they communicated at the end of their communication, I would always ask a question, even if I knew the answer. And that was for two things. It was to communicate to them that what they are doing is important and listening, and to give them another opportunity to demonstrate their expertise, because you're building their confidence, and you're trying to build this relationship as you go. I would never sit there just quietly and go, thank you, or, okay, because if you're a young person and you brief Matt Abrahams, and then at the end of it, you just go, thanks. I have no idea whether you're thinking, thanks, that was terrible, or thanks, that was great. So you have to exaggerate your positivity. You have to be very careful about your negativity. Because I found that if I am multitasking, if you're briefing me and you spend a lot of time and I'm down looking at my computer, I'm talking to the person next to me. One, it's disrespectful and it's embarrassing to you. And two, it just. It makes you not want to communicate, and so it becomes really difficult. And finally, if you got bad news to communicate, that's got to be done very carefully. Because if you got a group of people and someone does something and you sort of take them on. It's not like in a room where at the end of the meeting you can walk to the end of the table and put your hand on their shoulder and go to the coffee maker or something like that. They are going to literally stew in what they think was your negative impression. And so it becomes very important. And then the last thing, in big groups, you even have to watch your facial expressions because somebody's briefing you. And I used to take my glasses off and go like this and the chat rooms would light up and they'd say, what's bothering the old man? Well, sometimes you just had to wipe my face off. But I became sensitive to the fact that without being in the room they are relying on fewer cues and so they over index on those. And so I think we've all got to make a real conscious effort to understand that virtual is not the same. And a lot of people say, no, we're a virtual society now, we don't need to be in person. My counter to that is we found out during COVID that that remote education for our children doesn't work very well. And you say, well, that's kids. No, that's all of us. And we ought to pay attention to that. Because if it didn't work, hasn't worked in education, why do we want to tell ourselves we're as effective remotely working as we want to believe we are?
Matt Abrahams
That last point is a really important one because if you think about it, you have teachers who have been trained in ways to communicate and to connect. And if they can't make it work, how can we expect those of us who don't have that training to be able to do it? So several things there that you said are really important. I'm going to start with the nonverbal presence. When we have fewer cues, we really pay attention to them. And we have to make sure that we do things as simple as looking at the camera when we're talking to people, reminding ourselves that what we do signals information, not just what we say. The fact that you would go out of your way to build connection and comfort is really important because when we don't have that pre existing relationship, it really is mandatory that we actually try to connect. And I love that you would not only connect with the person by identifying their name, but at the end you would check in with them through asking a question, others paraphrase or summarize. There's a lot you can do to signal that you're interested and that you heard the person and Being virtual really.
Podcast Host/Announcer
Forces us to do that.
Matt Abrahams
So thank you for those best practices. In your latest book on character, which I love and think is really important, especially in this day and time, you argue that character is iterative. It's built through a succession of choices and actions. How can individuals leverage their everyday action and communication as tools for their own personal development of their character?
General Stanley McChrystal
Yeah, I feel very strongly about that, Matt, and thanks for the kind words. We start something, think of a diet you start or you quit smoking or you make some other promise to yourself, I am going to do something differently than the way I've done it. It's going to make me a better person in some ways. As you do those things, typically the longer you go, the more reason you have not to break the strength. If you've been on your diet for two days, you can break it. You don't feel that bad. If you've been on it for two months, you say, I don't want to break this because I really feel good on character. The same way applies. Some of them are just simply habits. I am going to be honest. And you might say, no, wait a minute, I'm an honest person. I don't have to remind myself. We do have to remind ourselves. We have to remind ourselves what we mean by integrity, how honest we intend to be in every interaction, and we have to hold ourselves to that. How we treat people, the respect we show for people, the grace we give to people. Again, it's something where we have to establish a clear standard. And says, my standard for dealing with this kind of people in this kind of situation is this, and I am not going to violate it. Now, you will find you get tired or irritable, and you might, but that can't reset the standard. What you've got to do is you say, my standard is this. I didn't do that. I'm going to. That's a mistake. I will try not to do that again. But we have a series of things that become almost like the rules of civility that George Washington made so famous when he wrote them down when he was a young man. And some of them were very basic, but they were just reminders to him. There are certain things you do and don't do. We need the same for ourselves.
Matt Abrahams
Absolutely. And you highlight something that you talk about. This, say, do gap, how you have to commit to something and then you actually have to show it and demonstrate it.
Podcast Host/Announcer
Now we're going to take a quick break for a message from our sponsors. Their support helps us bring you our show Think Fast. Talk Smart is brought to you by BetterHelp. October 10th is World Mental Health Day. Fall can be a stressful time of year. I know that I often feel rushed and out of sorts. Getting some guidance and advice can really help. I believe we all can benefit from therapy. That's where BetterHelp comes in. BetterHelp helps you find a therapist to meet your needs.
Matt Abrahams
You complete a short questionnaire about your.
Podcast Host/Announcer
Needs and preferences and then BetterHelp uses their 12 plus years of experience in industry leading match fulfillment to find you a therapist. If you aren't happy with your match, switch to a different therapist at any time from their tailored recommendations. This World mental health day, BetterHelp is celebrating the therapists who've helped millions of people take a step forward. If if you're ready to find the right therapist for you, BetterHelp can help you start that journey. Our listeners get 10% off their first month at betterhelp.com thinkfast that's BetterHelp H-E-L-P.com thinkfast hi Matt, here, do you want to discover the hidden side of everything? Then I'd suggest listening to one of my favorite podcasts, Freakonomics Radio. Hosted by the co author of the bestselling books, Stephen J. Dubner, Freakonomics Radio is exploring all the things you thought you knew but didn't, and all the things you never thought you wanted to know, but do.
Matt Abrahams
Each week, Freakonomics Radio tackles big topics.
Podcast Host/Announcer
Like why the banana is the most interesting fruit in the world, why the best employees can make the worst bosses, and why we dread the miracle of air travel. Listen to Freakonomics Radio wherever you get your podcasts.
Matt Abrahams
Before we end, I like to ask everybody three questions. One, I create just for you and the other two, I've been asking people for as long as we've been doing this, this show. Are you up for that?
General Stanley McChrystal
Sure.
Podcast Host/Announcer
All right.
Matt Abrahams
I've done a fair amount of work with the US Military and intelligence agencies and they're known for very structured communication with briefings for those of us who are outside the military. What are one or two valuable communication skills that you learned that help you be successful in the things that you did?
General Stanley McChrystal
The first is to be very clear, you know, we'd call it bottom line up front. Say what you're trying to communicate, don't obfuscate it and a bunch of other data. Just say X is X. And that's what I think. The second is understand that there is a hierarchical pressure for a certain outcome. Sometimes people have a briefing because they want to get a certain answer. And you've got to understand that that's not your role.
Matt Abrahams
So managing and maybe even pushing back against those conformity pressures is really important. And again, clarity and make sure that what you're saying is upfront, not buried in the details.
General Stanley McChrystal
That's right.
Matt Abrahams
Question number two, and I'll be very curious to hear your answer. Who is a communicator that you admire and why?
General Stanley McChrystal
There are a number of very effective communicators. If you go back to someone like Franklin Delano Roosevelt or Abraham Lincoln, they had a very measured cadence in communicating with the American people and they always tied it to values and general goals. And so like Franklin Roosevelt at the beginning of his first term, you know, depths of the depression, he's trying to communicate hope, he's trying to communicate action, he's trying to communicate we are all in this together. And so I find when I read and listen to the old recordings of that, a real sense of he knew what he was trying to accomplish with communication. He wasn't just communicating for the joy of it. And so I admire people with that kind of discipline.
Matt Abrahams
So it's the discipline, the focus and attaching it to bigger values and not surprising for somebody who has studied and thought a lot about character. Our final question, what are the first three ingredients that go into a successful communication recipe? I can almost be sure that clarity is going to be part of that.
General Stanley McChrystal
Yeah, it's got to be timely and it's got to be genuine because at some point whether or not we believe what we're communicating matters. We may get out and think we can disassemble in front of a bunch of people and they'll buy it, but over time it comes back. So if you don't believe is problematic to stand up there and say it.
Matt Abrahams
Clarity, timeliness and genuine and authenticity really important. Well, thank you gentleman Crystal, for your time and for your insight and for the good work you are doing around character and character building. Clearly in our time, that's very important. I appreciate the learnings and the lessons.
General Stanley McChrystal
You're kind to have me. Matt, thank you.
Matt Abrahams
Thank you for joining us for another episode of Think Fast Talk Smart, the podcast. To learn more about high stakes leadership under pressure, Listen to episode 155 with Susan Rice or episode episode 161 with Jen Psaki. This episode was produced by Kathryn Reed, Ryan Campos and me, Matt Abrahams. Our music is from Floyd Wonder. With special thanks to Podium Podcast company. Please find us on YouTube and wherever you get your podcasts, be sure to subscribe and rate us. Also, follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram and TikTok and check out fastersmarterio for deep dive videos, English language learning content and our newsletter. Please consider our Premium offering for extended Deep Thinks episodes, Ask Matt Anythings and much more at fastersmarter IO Premium.
Podcast Host/Announcer
I wanted to share with you that over the past few months I've had the amazing opportunity of talking to listeners across the globe about the impact the podcast has had on them. I love learning how people are applying the principles and concepts that we cover on the podcast and the impact that it has had on their lives. It is truly inspiring. Speaking on behalf of all of us that bring you the show, we thank you for your support. We look forward to bringing you new episodes, new techniques and deeper knowledge. And we ask for your support. It takes time and effort to put this show on the air. Please keep your ideas coming if you and if you can, we'd love for you to join our premium. Thank you. And here's to another 200 episodes.
Host: Matt Abrahams
Guest: General Stanley McChrystal
Date: October 7, 2025
This episode explores the essential role of transparency, character, and intentional communication in effective leadership. Host Matt Abrahams is joined by retired four-star General Stanley McChrystal to discuss overcoming communication silos, delivering difficult news, adapting to different cultures (even within the same organization), and fostering trust in both in-person and virtual environments. McChrystal emphasizes the iterative practice of character and its deep ties to honest, clear communication.
“You have to not try to prevent information. You have to compete with information that they’re already receiving.” — McChrystal (04:46)
“Senior leaders have got to be as transparent as they can.” — McChrystal (05:29)
“There is no real advantage in trying to make it seem not as serious as it is or to sugarcoat it... Give the context, give the rationale, and what you know.” — McChrystal (08:30)
“At the end of their communication, I would always ask a question... to communicate to them that what they’re doing is important and listening.” — McChrystal (12:36)
"Without being in the room... they over index [their attention] on those [nonverbal cues].” (13:40)
“If it didn’t work, hasn’t worked in education, why do we want to tell ourselves we’re as effective remotely working as we want to believe we are?” — McChrystal (14:53)
“We do have to remind ourselves. We have to remind ourselves what we mean by integrity, how honest we intend to be in every interaction, and we have to hold ourselves to that.” — McChrystal (16:46)
On Information Vacuums:
“When we leave a vacuum in our teams, they fill it with the darkest ideas available.” — McChrystal (04:37)
On Cultural Blind Spots:
“Sometimes just titles or uniforms or difference in organizations can create this, but we don’t seem sensitive to that.” — McChrystal (07:12)
Handling Bad News:
“If you’re not sure it’s going to be okay... don’t say it’s going to be okay. But you can communicate things like, ‘I am committed to this team. We will work through this.’” — McChrystal (09:10)
Relationship-building in Virtual Settings:
“If you and I had a real close personal relationship, we could then do virtual things at a much higher level of effectiveness than if we didn’t know each other.” — McChrystal (11:22)
| Timestamp | Topic | |---|---| | 00:50 | Introduction of General McChrystal & episode theme | | 02:08 | Dismantling silos and culture of information hoarding | | 04:11 | Risks of information withholding and the need to ‘compete’ with outside misinformation | | 05:26 | Behavior modeling and technology for transparency | | 06:25 | Adapting across cultural and organizational norms | | 08:24 | Delivering and clarifying difficult news (clarity, context, connection) | | 10:56 | Best practices for leading and communicating virtually | | 12:36 | Importance of engagement and nonverbal cues online | | 16:22 | Character-building through daily choices and consistent communication | | 20:33 | McChrystal’s top communication skills learned from the military | | 21:17 | Communicator McChrystal admires: Franklin D. Roosevelt for disciplined, values-based communication | | 22:22 | Three ingredients of successful communication: clarity, timeliness, genuineness |
“If you don’t believe, it is problematic to stand up there and say it.” — McChrystal (22:29)
This episode offers actionable wisdom for anyone tasked with leading teams, delivering tough messages, or striving to build trust and character in their professional and personal interactions. Through practical examples and a focus on the iterative nature of leadership, General McChrystal demonstrates that transparency, consistency, and authenticity are vital to effective communication.
For more resources and episodes, visit fastersmarter.io.