Transcript
A (0:00)
Hi Matt here with two ways to get deeper guidance and advice that can help your communication. First, check out our February newsletter to learn how to avoid a big nonverbal mirroring trap. Subscribe on our LinkedIn page or at FasterSmarterIO resources newsletter. Second, our friends at Kindle have a special offer running on my Think Faster, Talk Smarter ebook. You can get a copy for less than $3. Go to Kindle to check it out. Happy learning and thanks for listening. Now a word from our sponsors. Their support covers the cost of production, so we can bring you quality content free of charge. Hi Matt here. Career coaching often comes through our workplaces, which can be a great starting point. But sometimes you want space to focus on your priorities, not your organization's. That's where Strawberry Me comes in. It's career coaching. You. You choose for yourself. You answer a few quick questions, get matched with a vetted coach, and in many cases you can start within 24 hours. You choose the coach, you decide the goal, and you get to talk honestly about what actually matters. Whether that's a promotion, a pivot burnout, or even leaving. There's no HR involved, no performance review lens. And if it's not the right fit, you can switch coaches. What I appreciate is the sense of agency. When you're feeling stuck, waiting rarely helps. If you've been thinking something needs to change, you don't need permission to explore that. Go to Strawberry Me tfts. It's coaching focused on you. Think of it as therapy for your career. We are all part of the creator economy. We're all creators. My name is Matt Abrahams and I teach strategic communication at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Welcome to Think Fast, Talk Smart, the podcast. Today, I look forward to speaking with Angelle Christen. Angelle is an Associate professor of Communication and Sociology at Stanford University. Along with being a Senior Fellow at Stanford's Human Centered AI Institute, her work examines the social impact of algorithms and AI. She's the author of several books, with a new book coming out in fall of 2026. Well, welcome Angel. I am thrilled to learn from you today. Thanks for being here.
B (2:18)
Thank you for inviting me.
A (2:19)
Yeah. Shall we get started?
B (2:20)
Yes, absolutely.
A (2:22)
Your research looks at how metrics drive creators towards spectacle and drama. Can you share some insights and examples of this drama driving and the tension it creates between authenticity and performance?
B (2:35)
So, for me, that's so interesting. Just taking a step back. When you think about media production historically, if you think of print, newspapers, book writers, that kind of production people didn't have any idea about what their audience really wanted, right. They didn't have metrics, they didn't have data, and they certainly didn't have the kind of fine grain granular data that creators have today. So now you have this kind of like wave of metrics coming at you and you have a very clear sense of what people are really spending time on. And turns out when you're a creator and when you look at this kind of granular metrics, one thing that you realize very quickly is that viewers, listeners, followers typically spend more time engaged and are more likely to watch. And the content you create is more likely to go viral. When there is some drama by which I kind of realized term kind of refers to interpersonal kind of conflict or inflammatory kind of back and forth or kind of comments and response, typically with other creators, that's going to be great for you because you can also bring in the audience of the other creator. Right. So that kind of conflict or somewhat extreme content, again depends on what kind of content you post. But if you push a boundary of what you do, so for example, let's say you're a nutrition influencer and you're going to start proposing or offering like very extreme diets rights that are really kind of out there in terms of what you can consume, typically that's going to come with like more engagement. Right, right. And higher metrics. So that's the incentives. Now the problem though is that perhaps as a creators, you don't always want to follow these incentives. And so we go back to the first part of your question, which is how do creators navigate this tension between, on the one sense, on the one hand, the pressure to create content that kind of is more drama heavy or more extreme. And on the other hand, what their audience originally really liked them for, which was their relatability, their authenticity, their they are very unique editorial line. And so that kind of back and forth between kind of drama and extreme content on the one hand, and relatability and authenticity on the other, is something that every single creator is struggling with. You can think about it as a trade off between the short term and the long term. Right. So in the short term, if you optimize for kind of metrics and you really push drama, conflict, inflammatory and extreme content, you're going to get spikes in the number of views and the kind of virality of your content. But then perhaps in the long term or the middle term, some of your loyal followers and subscribers are going to be like, I don't really recognize persons or creators. The tones of voice that I used to love. And so perhaps I'm not going to come back. And every single creator I talk to over the past six years experiences some version of the tension, but at the end of the day, they have to pay the bills, right, to pay the rent. And so many of them, whether they want it or not, end up at some point prioritizing drama or extreme content.
