And, This is How The Left Fails Young Men with Richard Reeves

Summary

Podcast Summary: "And, This is How The Left Fails Young Men with Richard Reeves" Release Date: July 30, 2025
Title: This is Gavin Newsom
Host/Author: iHeartPodcasts

---

In this compelling episode of "This is Gavin Newsom," Governor Gavin Newsom engages in a profound conversation with Richard Reeves, founder and president of the American Institute for Boys and Men, moderated by Scott Galloway. The discussion delves deep into the systemic challenges facing young men in America, exploring themes of economic inequality, mental health crises, and the cultural shifts that have left many young men feeling isolated and undervalued.

1. Introduction to the Crisis Facing Young Men

The episode opens with Scott Galloway highlighting the emerging theme of male and adolescent disenfranchisement:

Scott Galloway [03:25]: "What is going on with our men and boys, increasingly isolated, increasingly feeling disengaged, disconnected, depressed."

Galloway cites alarming statistics, noting that men account for 80% of suicides and face higher dropout and suspension rates compared to their female counterparts. He emphasizes the urgent need to address these issues beyond electoral politics.

2. Richard Reeves’ Journey and Insights

Richard Reeves shares his academic and personal journey that led him to focus on the plight of boys and men:

Richard Reeves [06:11]: "I was working on issues around economic inequality and noticed that boys and men, especially from working-class backgrounds and men of color, were driving much of the economic disparities."

Reeves highlights the lack of attention given to the male gender in policy discussions and the personal impact of raising three sons in an affluent household, which contrasted with the struggles he observed among less privileged young men.

3. The Misconception of a Zero-Sum Game

Galloway challenges the notion that focusing on young men detracts from women's issues:

Richard Reeves [10:48]: "We can do two things at once... there’s a bunch more stuff we need to do for women and girls... but we can also look at the fact that the suicide rate among young men has risen by a third since 2010."

Reeves argues that addressing the needs of both young men and women simultaneously benefits society as a whole, dismantling the false dichotomy that advocating for men equates to being anti-women.

4. The Impact of the Manosphere and Online Culture

The conversation shifts to the influence of online communities and the manosphere on young men's perceptions of masculinity:

Richard Reeves [26:40]: "I've come to think that the term 'manosphere' is not helpful because it just lumps together people who are doing very different things."

Reeves differentiates between various online masculinist groups, emphasizing the need for nuanced understanding rather than broad generalizations that paint all as misogynistic or reactionary.

5. Economic and Educational Shifts

Reeves discusses the economic transformations that have undermined traditional male roles:

Richard Reeves [29:34]: "They are looking for an answer to the question, how should I be a man today? ... the traditional role of breadwinner has, to a very large extent, disappeared."

He connects the decline in male-dominated professions, like teaching and social work, to broader economic changes and the resulting identity crises among young men.

6. Policy Solutions and Institutional Changes

The dialogue moves towards actionable solutions, with Reeves advocating for policies that support male involvement in education and mental health:

Richard Reeves [66:02]: "If we can do for HEAL—health and education jobs for men—what we did for women in STEM, it would be a huge win."

Reeves emphasizes the importance of increasing male representation in caregiving and educational roles, suggesting that public policy should incentivize men to enter these fields to provide role models and alleviate feelings of unneededness among young men.

7. The Democratic Party's Oversight

Reeves critiques the Democratic Party's neglect of male issues, attributing it to a strategic focus on women's concerns:

Richard Reeves [55:32]: "The Democrats were very determined to be seen, particularly by women, as the party that was supporting them. ... there was nothing on the Democrat side."

He argues that this oversight allowed Republicans to effectively attract young male voters by addressing their concerns, leading to significant political shifts.

8. The Urgency of Addressing Young Men's Mental Health

The conversation underscores the critical need to prioritize mental health support for young men:

Richard Reeves [44:47]: "They aren’t sure that the economy needs them, they're not sure that their family needs them, they're not sure their community needs them."

Reeves highlights the importance of creating environments where young men feel valued and needed, suggesting that community involvement and mentorship can play pivotal roles in reducing suicide rates and fostering a sense of purpose.

9. Closing Thoughts and Call to Action

Governor Newsom concludes the episode by acknowledging the significance of the discussion:

Scott Galloway [73:46]: "This is not political, this is about community. This is about who we are. It’s about the commonwealth more broadly."

The episode serves as a clarion call to policymakers, communities, and individuals to recognize and address the multifaceted challenges facing young men, advocating for a balanced approach that supports both men's and women's evolving roles in society.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Richard Reeves [10:48]: "Men are struggling in our economy and struggling in our society. It's bad for everybody if young men and boys are struggling."

• Richard Reeves [29:34]: "They are looking for an answer to the question, how should I be a man today?"

• Richard Reeves [55:32]: "The Democrats... there was nothing on the Democrat side."

• Richard Reeves [44:47]: "We need to find a way to supply that sense to many men that we still need you."

---

Conclusion: This episode of "This is Gavin Newsom" sheds light on the often-overlooked struggles of young men in contemporary society. Through the insightful dialogue between Newsom and Reeves, listeners gain a deeper understanding of the economic, social, and cultural factors contributing to the current crisis. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of inclusive policies and community efforts to support young men, highlighting the interconnectedness of gender issues and the broader implications for societal well-being.

Transcript

[Danielle Robay]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Cindy Crawford]

There'S nothing.

[Unknown]

Like sinking into luxury. @washablesofas.com you'll find the Annabe sofa which combines ultimate comfort and design at an affordable price. And get this, it's the only sofa that's fully machine washable from top to bottom. Starting at only $699. The stain resistant performance fabric slipcovers and and cloud like frame duvet can go straight into your wash. Perfect for anyone with kids, pets or anyone who loves an easy to clean spotless sofa. With a modular design and changeable slipcovers, you can customize your sofa to fit any space and style. Whether you need a single chair, loveseat or a luxuriously large sectional, Annabe has you covered. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your home. Right now you can shop up to 60% off store wide with a 30 day money back guarantee. Shop [e-mail] Add a little to your life. Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

Homes.com is the only place where you can find specialized neighborhood guides with the in depth insider info home shoppers want. Very in depth info. Want to know if there's homes for sale in the area? We've got it. How long has a home been on the market? We'll know it. Average lot size? Uh huh. Proximity to local parks, of course, Insight into your neighbor's divorce. We're working on it. Homes.com we've done your homework.

[Danielle Robay]

Just like great shoes, great books take you places through unforgettable love stories and into conversations with characters you'll never forget.

[Richard Reeves]

I think any good romance. It gives me this feeling of like butterflies.

[Danielle Robay]

I'm Danielle Robaix and this is bookmarked by Reese's Book Club. The new podcast from hello Sunshine and I Heart Podcast where we dive into the stories that shape us on the page and off. Each week I'm joined by authors, celebs, book talk stars and more for conversations that will make you laugh, cry and add way too many books to your TBR pile. Listen to Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown]

The stuff you should know guys have made their own summer playlists of their must listen podcasts on movies. It's me, Josh and I'd like to welcome you to the stuff you should know Summer Movie Playlist. What screams summer more than a nice darkened air conditioned theater and a great movie playing right in front of you? Episodes on J, James Bond, special effects, stunt men and women, disaster films, even movies that change filmmaking and many more. Listen to the Stuff youf Should Know Summer Movie Playlist on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Richard Reeves]

So what happened at Chappaquiddick?

[Unknown]

Well, it really depends on who you talk to.

[Gavin Newsom]

There are many versions of what happened in 1969 when a young Ted Kennedy.

[Richard Reeves]

Drove a car into a pond and left a woman behind to drown. Chappaquiddick is a story of a tragic death and how the Kennedy machine took control.

[Gavin Newsom]

Every week we go behind the headlines and beyond the drama of America's royal family.

[Unknown]

Listen to United States of Kennedy on.

[Richard Reeves]

The iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

[Scott Galloway]

So if you tuned into the podcast, you may have noticed a theme, a theme that continues to emerge around men and boys. What is going on with our men and boys, Increasingly isolated, increasingly feeling disengaged, disconnected, depressed. Big conversations with Jackson Katz and Scott Galloway where this issue was highlighted. We mind the issue not only on the substance as it relates to this crisis of isolation for men and boys, but outcomes, outcomes that are moving in just devastating directions. 80% of suicides, men, dropout rates, suspension rates, disproportionately, men. You see graduation rates, particularly college attendance and graduation, going through the roof for women and girls, but not again for men. It's not just an electoral issue. So often this is discussed in the context of Trump doing so well in the last election with young men in the manosphere and more broadly, doing well with men generally. But the issue is an important issue that we need to dive deeper in. And that's just what we did recently with Richard Reeves, who's the founder of the president of the American Institute of Boys and Men. And we had a conversation that really goes to the root of why what is going on not just in the United States, but increasingly all around the world with young men. And this led me to, to look inward as well as governor of California, to say, what more can I do? And so we are also putting out today, concurrent with this podcast, an executive order that focuses exactly on that what to do. Not just who's to blame and what the challenges are, but specific, tangible actions that we can invest our time and energy into beginning to solve this growing crisis. This is Gavin Newsom, and this is Richard Reeves. All right, Richard Reeves, thanks so much for joining us. And more importantly, thank you for your work. And I'm just curious because the amount of attention you're Getting is outsized, obviously, people rediscovering this remarkable book that was extraordinarily well received of boys and men when you wrote it, but now seemingly rediscovered it because of sort of the moment we're living in. But I'm curious, what moment led you to this moment, Meaning this whole issue around masculinity, issues around boys and men, your own journey to. To, you know, being one of the most important figures in trying to understand what the hell is going on with American men.

[Richard Reeves]

Yeah. Well, thank you. Thanks for that question and for having me. I guess the way to think about it is I was spending my days at Brookings Institution being a scholar, reading papers, going to seminars. Imagine what a Brookings Institution scholar does. And that is exactly what we do. You read a paper, you go to a seminar, you read another paper. And I was working on issues around economic inequality. That's really been the through line of my work. And in particular, intergenerational inequality, like, what's stopping people moving up the ladder. I did that in the UK government, which is where I'm originally from, and then at Brookings. And I just kept seeing these data points where it was really a lot of boys and men, especially those from working class backgrounds, boys and men of color, who are driving a lot of the economic inequalities that we were worried about. But I didn't see that many people paying attention to that particular gender part of the story. And then I would be going home, and I've got three sons, and they're being raised in an affluent, educated household. So they are not the boys and men who we should be most worried about from a policy point of view. But nonetheless, they had a lot of questions. They were spending a lot of time online. I think the whole debate about masculinity, the roles of men and women shifting so quickly, was playing out over our dinner table as well. And so in the end, those things came together. And honestly, part of it was that I didn't think that many people were having a good faith conversation about this. I saw a lot of bad faith discussions of what was happening to boys and men, but not many empirically based, good faith discussions. And so that was what I decided to do.

[Scott Galloway]

And so you're at Brookings. You're focused on issues around middle class, income inequality, wealth inequality. You wrote a book in that space around upper middle class. And so what year, roughly, was that that research really started, and you started to notice this trend or this lack of focus and intentionality on boys and men.

[Richard Reeves]

Yeah, so I wrote A book called Dream Hoarders, which came out in 2017. And it was really about the way that the upper middle class, the professional class, top 10, 20%, were really pulling away from everybody else and how that was causing all kinds of issues. And candidly, that we, because I put myself solidly in that class, really weren't taking responsibility for the ways in which we were actually rigging the opportunity system. You think about the housing market, which I know you're very interested in, higher education, which also very interested in. I saw those systems working pretty well for me and my neighbors in Bethesda, Maryland, where I was living at the time. But I also saw us holding other people out. So I think that was one of the root causes of the political moment that we're in, but also just this cultural moment. And then I looked at it harder and I looked and I saw actually, you know what? It's a lot of men who are just struggling to rise up the ladder. They're doing worse than their fathers did. I mean, the fact that men without a college degree only earn the same today as that group of men did 50 years ago, like wage stagnation for most men over a half century, is a story. And it's a huge part of that economic inequality, and it's a huge part of why we don't see that upward mobility, because those men are struggling. They then maybe don't form families, or if they do, they're not able to kind of provide for them in the way they'd hope to. Women are, of course, then picking up more and more of the slack, which is, I know, something you're also interested in. I think your other half is even more interested in the whole idea of fair play and so on. And so I think in the end, it's just bad for everybody if young men and boys are struggling in our economy and struggling in our society. And so that's really why, in the end, I think, just needed a different kind of spotlight on the question.

[Scott Galloway]

So the question always arises is this notion of a zero sum game, that if we're talking about boys and men, we're not talking about women and girls and we're talking about boys and men. We're talking about it's sort of historic advantage that goes back, you know, hundreds and hundreds, thousands and thousands of years to, you know, particularly white males. Why the hell do we need to be focusing on them at a time when women still are struggling to get equal pay, still do not have the kind of gender equality in the home? Back to the reference you were just making in terms of fair play in the household. Women are still absorbing so much of that burden and so much of that work. There's still so much more work that needs to be done for women and girls. Why, Richard, spend so much time on boys and men?

[Richard Reeves]

Well, because we can do two things at once. That's my bet. My huge bet here is that people, including policymakers like yourself, are able to do both, able to simultaneously say, there's a bunch more stuff we need to do for women and girls. And you've just listed some of them. I'll add one more. I think it's particularly relevant to your state, which is only 2% of venture capital money goes to female founders. Now, I happen to be married to someone who has herself tried to raise money for the venture capital market, so I'm obliged by the terms of my marital contract to mention that in every interview that I do. And you're not allowed to cut that out. And so like the idea. And what, 25% of members of Congress are women. 10% of CEOs are women. Like the idea that there isn't more still to do for women and girls is crazy. But the idea that that means we can't also look at the fact that the suicide rate among young men has risen by a third since 2010, and that we lose 40,000 men a year to suicide, four times as many as we do for women. I've mentioned wage stagnation, that we have these huge gender gaps in education now where a lot of boys really struggling at school. And I think it's a bit like saying to a parent who has a son and a daughter, or at least one of each, and basically saying to them, you're only allowed to choose one of them to care about. It's almost like we've done that to ourselves as a society. And somehow anybody advocating for the issues of boys and men is immediately castigated as someone who's anti women. And to be fair, lots of the people who are advocating for boys and men are anti women, right? And so that becomes a really vicious cycle. And just to speak personally for a moment, that was one of the reasons why I couldn't get a publisher for my book to start with. It's one of the reasons why, at the time I was at Brookings, my colleagues were lining up outside my door warning me against this issue. And the argument was only reactionary. Angry misogynists write books about boys and men. Therefore, if you write a book about boys and men, you will be seen as an angry reactionary misogynist. And I thought about that, decided that's the definition of a vicious cycle. And you've then just ceded all that ground to those very folks. You've created a vacuum. And honestly, if people, as people, as boring as I am, Governor, can't talk about this issue, then we're in real trouble. Like, one of the mottos of my new institute, the American Institute for Boys and Men, is keep it boring. And as my son, my middle son likes to point out, he says, you're the man for that job, dad, if that's your mission. They found their president. And. But there's a serious point behind that, which is that, like, we need data, we need research, and we need to do it, as you said a moment ago, in a non0some way, because I think you've spoken about this and I'd be interested to see how your, your thinking has evolved on this, which is the question is not is there going to be a conversation about what does it mean to be a man today? The question is, who's going to have it? Are you going to have it in the conversations you're having now? Are other governors going to have it? Are the mainstream media going to have it? Are think tanks going to have it? Or are we all just going to say, no, no, no, that's not for us. We don't want people to think we're misogynists. And so we leave the conversation to the reactionary online. Right. And I'm afraid that if that's the case, we deserve to lose these young men. Like, we can't. You don't create a vacuum and then complain about the fact that someone's pouring into it.

[Scott Galloway]

I love what you just said. I mean, it's one of the reasons we started this podcast with Charlie Kirk, who's one of the many people in this space that is filling that void. And I want to talk a little bit more, not about necessarily that space, specifically in the manosphere, and talk about your reaction to this notion of the manosphere, just the nomenclature of the manosphere more broadly. But it is interesting to me just backing up a little bit what you said. I mean, the fact that you had difficulty finding publishers for the book. That there was so. And this isn't that long. I mean, you're talking about just a few years ago, right?

[Richard Reeves]

20, 21. Yeah.

[Scott Galloway]

That there was that kind of reticence around moving this conversation forward or broadening the appeal beyond just sort of a reactionary right wing framework. And you're by the way, hardly a left wing. This is not a political thing per se, but it's interesting to me, even your friends and colleagues were warning you against entering in this space.

[Richard Reeves]

It's just seen as. It was seen as very dangerous territory. I think the permission space has really opened up around it in recent years because I just think in the end these things are true, these problems are true. And if something's true, you can't ignore it forever. And it's become one of my strongest beliefs that the way to turn a real problem into a grievance is to simply ignore it. I think ignored problems are what metastasize into grievances. And so if I'm in a conversation with someone who is sore on the men's right side of the argument or reactionary, I want them to sound crazy. When they claim that the governors, the presidents, the think tanks don't care about boys and men. They will say so. A figure like Andrew Tate or others will say they don't care about boys and men. And I want that claim to sound crazy, but the trouble is it doesn't sound crazy right now. We haven't done enough. There haven't been enough policies, there haven't been enough public announcements about. We see the problems of boys and men from, frankly, people like you, Governor, and from others. I think this is a fantastic move, but I don't think it's unfair of the people on the conservative or even the reactionary side of this argument to point to what has been something of a deafening silence from the other side of the aisle on this issue for the reasons that we've already talked about, that fear that somehow you'd be seen as anti woman, but that has just created this, seeded the ground. And so I don't, My goal is to make the crazies sound crazy, but right now they don't.

[Scott Galloway]

You know, it's interesting just in, in, in, in, in taking, you know, a little bit of my own journey on this, you know, and I appreciate your reference to my wife. She's done a series of documentaries and, and one of the documentaries, her second documentary was around masculinity, was around the issues of boys and men in 2015, around the same time you were starting to write that book around income inequality, she was highlighting the suicide rates and the dropout rates and issues around incarceration, crime, self harm and the like. Self in isolation, loneliness. It wasn't a focus as much on what was happening in terms of algorithms and online activity, but it was interesting just that the reaction she Got. She did it from the feminist perspective, bringing in Jackson Katz and some of the others that focus on the issues of violence and women. But the reaction to it was pretty remarkable, to your point. And even I saw myself on that journey as I'm there promoting the film, promoting the, the sort of contours of that debate, how uncomfortable it was particularly for me to enter that bait. And I sort of stepped back. And you're right, I think there's been a huge void, particularly in the Democratic Party on this issue. And you're right, these folks on the other side have, have walked into that debate and they've weaponized it, some more benign than others. But obviously the issues, how the politics has changed is I think, an interesting.

[Richard Reeves]

Part of this, to be fair to you and to the, to the Democratic Party. I don't think it was just the Democratic Party. I think it was the liberal establishment kind of writ large. It was the think tanks, it was the media, where this was just difficult. And, and one of the things I've really come to believe about this is that you just described your own discomfort with talking about this issue. And I suspect that you're still feeling some of that now. And what I would say is good, you don't want to lose that discomfort. Because I honestly think that it should be an uncomfortable conversation given the history, given the issues we still have to work on for women. There should be a difficulty to this conversation. There should be a discomfort to this conversation. I honestly think if you don't find this conversation a little bit uncomfortable, you shouldn't be in it. Right? I think if you think it's all simple, yeah, men are struggling because the woke feminists have taken over. And we just need to go back, say 50, 100, 150 years. Take your pick. Anybody who thinks like that shouldn't be in the conversation. But on the other hand, we shouldn't let the natural, in fact honorable discomfort that we feel and honestly that obviously women are going to feel much more strongly, that should be acknowledged, that should be discussed, but it shouldn't stop us, it should make us pause. It should be something that we get into the room that we say, of course this is difficult and of course there's more we need to do of women and girls. And there's also this bunch of issues for boys and men. And my experience of this, and I'd be interested to see whether you agree with this, is that if you frame it that way, actually there's a huge appetite to have this conversation, including among the most feminist women out there because they have sons, they have brothers, they have husbands. As long as there isn't this fear that this is going to be used as a way to go back on women's rights or to negate the ongoing work of women. As long as people trust you that that's not what you're doing, then I have discovered the appetite for this conversation is huge.

[Gavin Newsom]

What does feeling safe at home really mean to you? For many it might seem that having good locks and maybe an alarm that would, you know, make a lot of noise if somebody actually broke. True security takes more a system that works to prevent that break in, that violation of your space from ever happening in the first place. SimpliSafe is trusted to protect homes and families. It's about security that is proactive, not just reactive. Most security systems only take action after someone breaks in that's too late. SimpliSafe's new Active Guard Outdoor Protection helps stop break ins before they happen. AI powered cameras plus live monitoring agents detect suspicious activity around your property. If someone's lurking, agents talk to them in real time, turn on spotlights and can call the police proactively deterring crime before it starts. No contracts, no hidden fees Named Best Home security system of 2025 by CNET 4 million plus Americans Trust SimpliSafe ranked number one in customer service by Newsweek and USA Today Monitoring plans start around $1 a day 60 day money back guarantee visit simplisafe.com Gavin to claim 50% off a new system with a professional monitoring plan and get your first month free. That's simplisafe.com Gavin there's no safe like SimpliSafe.

[Unknown]

Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? WashablesOfAs.com has your back. Featuring the Annabe collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out. Where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud like comfort with high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60% off your Anna Bay sofa backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back upgrade [e-mail] offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

@Homes.Com we do whatever it takes to get you the in depth info on local schools you won't anywhere else. Things like student teacher ratio, test scores in school programs, and sometimes that requires attending school recitals. So many recitals.

[Scott Galloway]

That's my son.

[Unknown]

Isn't he terrific? Yeah, a real prodigy. Homes.com we've done your homework.

[Cindy Crawford]

Now I'd like to introduce you to Meaningful Beauty, the famed skincare brand created by iconic supermodel Cindy Crawford. It's her secret to Apple Absolutely gorgeous Skin. Meaningful Beauty makes powerful and effective skin care simple and it's loved by millions of women. It's formulated for all ages in all skin tones and types and it's designed to work as a complete skin care system, leaving your skin feeling soft, smooth and nourished. I recommend starting with Cindy's full regimen which contains all five of her best selling products including the Amazing Youth Activating Melon Serum. This next generation serum has the power of melon leaf stem cell technology. It's melon leaf stem cells encapsulated for freshness and released onto the skin to support a visible reduction in the appearance of wrinkles. With thousands of glowing five star reviews, why not give it a try? Subscribe today and you can get the Amazing Meaningful Beauty system for just $49.95. That includes our introductory five piece system, free gifts, free shipping and a 60 day money back guarantee. All of that available at Meaningful Beauty.

[Danielle Robay]

Just like great shoes, great books take you places through unforgettable love stories and into conversations with characters you'll never forget.

[Richard Reeves]

I think any good romance, it gives me this feeling of like butterflies.

[Danielle Robay]

I'm Danielle Robaix and this is bookmarked by Reese's Book Club, the new podcast from hello Sunshine and I Heart Podcasts. Every week I sit down with your favorite book lovers, authors, celebrities, book talkers and more to explore Explore the stories that shape us on the page and off. I've been reading every Reese's Book Club pick deep diving booktok theories and obsessing over book to screen casts for years. And now I get to talk to the people making the magic. So if you've ever fallen in love with a fictional character or cried at the last chapter or passed a book to a friend saying you have to read this. This podcast is for you. Listen to Bookmarked by Reese's Book club on the iHeartRadio app. Apple Podcasts are wherever you get your podcasts.

[Scott Galloway]

But laying that foundation becomes critical. And that's, that's a central part, I think, of creating that, as you say, that permission, that space where we could have this dialogue in a constructive way. That said as well, I mean, there's been that reaction, you know, we've got, you know, people like Josh Howley writes a book on manhood and seem to go again in a direction that a lot of folks online have gone. You expressed one of the, or at least highlighted one of the more extreme voices, Andrew Tate, in this space. I think you've written about and talked about even your own kids, the relationship to Andrew as it relates to their algorithms online. Even Jordan Peterson, who, you know, has had his own evolution or devolution, depending on how some people view his perspectives on a myriad of issues. But this issue, you're right, has really come to the fore. I think about it, you know, with my wife, we have two boys, two girls, and my wife is now the bigger crusader on this, saying, what the hell has happened to our boys? What is going on online? What is happening? Why is he bringing up Andrew Tate? Why is he talking about. He talked. I'm smiling because when you were writing about this Jordan Peterson. He's telling me about Jordan Peterson. Before I knew much about Jordan Peterson.

[Richard Reeves]

My kids were telling me about Andrew Tate. My youngest son, who's now 23, said when I was finishing my book, he said, dad, you have to write about Andrew Tate. And I said, who the hell is Andrew Tate? I looked briefly at him, decided that he wasn't a big enough figure to worry about, didn't mention him. But of course, you know, of course I was wrong. And it's very interesting how the. Let's just assume for the sake of this argument that you and I are both middle aged, right? That might be flattering both of us, but let's go with it. Let's take it. But we just honestly don't understand it. I think you got into a little bit of trouble for lumping together Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate at one point, and I don't think you do that now. I think that was a moment where this sort of gauzy, blobby thing over there was just hard to decode. But as you get closer to it, you understand that within it, big differences. I even. I've actually come to think that the term manosphere is not helpful because it's just. It just lumps together people who are doing very, very different things in different ways. And the young men who are the disproportionate consumers of a lot of that content, they understand the differences. And so if we don't sound like we understand the differences, then we just sound like, you know, old men shaking our fist at the world. And so I don't know how to do this yet, but there's almost like a bro sphere, which is more like Rogan, certainly Chris Williamson, who I like quite a lot, and maybe even, you know, Theo Vaughn, I've been on his podcast. And then there's the kind of misogynosphere or I don't know what to call, do you know what I mean? And they're, they're very different. And it's quite important to keep that difference in our minds because otherwise people think they're all the same and they're really not. What they are all doing is trying to come up with answers to the questions that many young men are asking. And they're doing so with various degrees of openness and fidelity. And you can't throw them all together. And to do so is to again, make a similar version of that mistake we were talking about earlier, which is to cede all that ground. Just don't go there.

[Scott Galloway]

I love, I think what you just said is extraordinarily important. And in, in what you also reference, I think is important. What are these young boys looking for? I mean, we, we, you know, we, we see how they fall prey to the algorithms. And you know, you've written obviously a lot about, you know, what, you know, you know, these kids and their body images and issues related, you know, six pack abs or, you know, maybe they're on gaming and all of a sudden then, you know, they're, they're, they're on an Andrew Tate. You know, they're asking their parents for 35 bucks to become part of his Andrew Tate Masculinity University or some hybrid version of that for someone else. But what are young boys looking for?

[Richard Reeves]

They are looking for an answer to the question how should I be a man today? And the bit of that that's hard is today it's just much harder. And that has. That question is being asked with an urgency which is new. It's not that it hasn't always had to be asked to some extent. Right. I think every generation has got to think about that. But there's a new urgency to it now, partly for the really good reason of the huge rise in the economic independence of women. So I'm one of the people who celebrates the fact that 40% of women now earn more than the typical man. The median Man. Now, that's not equality. That would mean 50%. Right. But in 1979, that figure was 13%, and that's well within my lifetime. And so, in the space of a very short period of economic history, we have transformed the economic relationships between men and women in a way that is wonderful. Arguably the greatest economic liberation in human history as it rolls around the world. Still far from complete. But is that the fact that my wife has had opportunities that my mom could only dream of? That's just the most wonderful thing. And it has put a question mark next to the role of men, because the traditional role of breadwinner has, to very large extent now disappeared, for the very good reason I've just identified. But we shouldn't be naive about the fact that doesn't actually then put a big question mark. And we shouldn't be naive about the fact that will leave some men at least hungering for the world where you knew what it meant to be a man. So they're asking the question and going online and finding all kinds of different answers. And I will say one more thing, which is maybe a bit more of a critique of the. What's the cultural blobby left? I don't know what. Just. I'm sure you know what I mean. That's the blob, the liberal blob, which is they have done a much better job of outlining what not to do as a man, what not to be as a man than what to do. A lot of young men feel like they've come out into the world with a long list of don'ts. Don't say this. Don't do it.

[Scott Galloway]

Don't say this. I mean, just in terms of the political correctness the way.

[Richard Reeves]

Yeah. And just, you know, the consent story and so on too. And to be clear, in case it needs to be said again, all good. But I had this experience with one of my kids, came home from, I guess it was middle or early high, and they'd done the social skills class or the relationship class or whatever, whatever Orwellian term is being used to describe the kind of social, emotional skills, how to, like how to get by in the world, world class thing. Right. And sorry, that was very unfair to say it was all well in. But. But you know what I mean, it's always this weird thing, the social skills and emotional vocabulary literacy class or something. And I said, well, what did you learn? And he said, we did masculinity stuff today. And I said, that's interesting. What did you learn? And he said, here's a list of 33 things that I know I'm not supposed to do also.

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah, yeah.

[Richard Reeves]

And we went through the list together. I agreed with every single one of them, and we had a good conversation about them. And I said. And he said, no, that was it. So for reasons that I understand, but I am increasingly impatient with, there's been a reluctance to set out a kind of positive vision of modern masculinity, one that's compatible with gender equality, but is still appealing to young men for fear that that will somehow send us down this slippery slope back to the 1950s again. But what that means is that we've done a really good job of setting out the curriculum of what not to be without anything positive to take the place of the old script. So we've torn up the old script of masculinity, which was based around protector, provider, breadwinner. We've torn that up, and we've torn up the old one around femininity, which was, you're going to be a mom, housewife, mom. We torn them both up. We replaced the female one with an incredibly powerful and rather beautiful one about empowerment and liberation. You go, girl. The future's female. Girls on the run. Black girl magic. I love all of it. So it's very kind of culture of empowerment and possibility that we've replaced now for girls and women. We also tore up the old male script, and we didn't replace it. And so we just tore up the old one and said, yeah, well, you're not going to be like your dad. The economy is very different now. And so then the question, okay, well, what should I be like then? We haven't had a good answer to that. But along come some of the online folks and they have a very clear answer, and if we don't like it, we need a better one. The idea that we don't need one is the ultimate naivety. I think that's what's happened. There's become this sense that equality will require androgyny. And honestly, I think I used to think that too. I think in my. I used to think, ah, let's get past all this masculine, feminine, male, female stuff. Let's all, you know, we're all human. And I still love that idea. But I've really come to believe, partly as a result of my own experience as a parent more generally, that that is naive, that we do actually still need a way to talk about men and women overlapping and distinct, but still beautiful.

[Scott Galloway]

So I want to unpack that. This notion of filling that Void. And painting a positive alternative is foundational and critical. And I want to get to some of your specific ideas in that space. But take me back a little bit. You've written a lot about this. I come from California. Go west, young man, go west. This notion of the great frontier, the freedom, and this guy or gal, or at least guy in this case on the white horse, comes saving the day. Sort of the John Wayne of occasion. Reagan, you know, coast of dream, the whole thing. This notion of the Lone Ranger, as you write about it, being free, but you suggest increasingly lonely. I mean, sort of bring us back a little bit.

[Richard Reeves]

Yeah. And to be clear, that just that description. I mean, I'm a proud US citizen, have been since 2016. And that pioneering spirit, that sense of optimism and growth and possibility is. I used to work here before this, too. I just love, love, love that about this country. But do you think there's this sense that at its worst, there's this movement online, the men going their own way movement, which is literally just men decoupling from society and becoming. They're sort of male separatists, essentially just saying we need to separate ourselves away from society. But even a bit less extreme than that, there's this sense of like, men are supposed to be independent and if men going to get married, it's because, you know, a woman will sort of trap him into it. You talk about the ball and chain. There's all these tropes around that. Well, actually, it turns out in the most recent surveys, men think being married is more important than women do. And that's because men know something. And the truth is that masculinity, properly defined, has always been relational. It's always been about service and surplus. I came across this definition in the literature for anthropology, saying that actually in a lot of societies, the marker of going from boy to man was when you were producing more of something than you needed for yourself, you're producing a surplus, right? Could be meat, it could be money, it could be something. And that's because just in the natural environment, like, it takes a long time to raise kids, and that's very demanding on. On the mums. And so it was. Masculinity was literally defined by service, was literally defined by giving more than you get, producing more than you need. Now what that thing is going to be will change. That's very important to say, because again, this can sound like we're calling for the old system, but I still love that idea that actually the way that you can tell if someone's a man is how he is with other people, how he is with his own kids, other people's kids. If he's a teacher. My middle son is now a teacher in Baltimore City. And watching him, big guy at the front of a classroom, and he coaches soccer, he coaches the girls soccer team. Just there's something about that which is beautiful. And I'm not suggesting, of course, that women don't also do that, to be clear. But there is something about this idea of what I would refer to as relational masculinity, as opposed to lone ranger masculinity. I think a man going his own way and only looking out for himself is actually not a man. That's the least masculine thing you can do, is only look out for yourself. And that's. That's been true throughout human history. Right? It's about the tribe, it's about the family, it's about your people. And so I've really been disturbed by this strand of separatism and stark autonomy that you see online, which is like a real man is a man who answers only to himself. And sorry, but that's just. And every human society has shown that to be the case. A man is someone who gives. And my father was like that. I mean, I saw that being played out in my own childhood, which was like he was the guy that defined himself by his very embeddedness in his community, not his separateness from it. And I really worry about the isolation that's gripping many of our men now. And I think it's because of this false idea about what it means to be a man.

[Gavin Newsom]

What does feeling safe at home really mean to you? For many, it might seem that having good locks and maybe an alarm that would, you know, make a lot of noise if somebody actually broke in. True security takes more a system that works to prevent that break in, that violation of your space from ever happening in the first place. Simplisafe is trusted to protect homes and families. It's about security that is proactive, not just reactive. Most security systems only take action after someone breaks in. That's too late. Simplisafe's new active guard outdoor protection helps stop break ins before they happen. AI powered cameras plus live monitoring agents detect suspicious activity around your property. If someone's lurking, agents talk to them in real time, turn on spotlights and can call the police proactively deterring crime before it starts. No contracts, no hidden fees. Named best home security system of 2025 by CNET 4 million plus Americans trust SimpliSafe. Ranked number one in customer service by Newsweek and USA Today monitoring plans start around $1 a day 60 day money back guarantee. Visit simplisafe.com Gavin to claim 50% off a new system with a professional monitoring plan and get your first month free. That's simplisafe.com Gavin there's no safe like SimpliSafe.

[Unknown]

There's nothing like sinking into luxury. At washablesofas.com, you'll find the Annabe sofa which combines ultimate comfort and design at an affordable price. And get this, it's the only sofa that's fully machine washable from top to bottom. Starting at only $699. The stain resistant performance fabric slipcovers and cloud like frame duvet can go straight into your wash. Perfect for anyone with kids, pets or anyone who loves an easy to clean spotless sofa. With a modular design and changeable slipcovers, you can customize your sofa to fit any space and style. Whether you need a single chair, loveseat or a luxuriously large sectional, Annabe has you covered. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your home. Right now you can shop up to 60% off store wide with a 30 day money back guarantee. Shop [e-mail] Add a little to your life. Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply with a detailed agent.

Directory you won't find anywhere else. Homes.com is the only place to find the in depth info home shoppers want very in depth info. Looking for a listing agent's contact info? We've got it. The agent with the most sales in your price range. Easy specialized agents with all the up to date info on your dream neighborhood. We'll know them. A Pisces who enjoys long walks on the beach. You've got other sites for that. Homes.com We've done your homework.

[Cindy Crawford]

Now I'd like to introduce you to Meaningful Beauty, the famed skincare brand created by iconic supermodel Cindy Crawford. It's her secret to absolutely gorgeous skin. Meaningful Beauty makes powerful and effective skin care simple and it's loved by millions of women. It's formulated for all ages and all skin tones and types and it's designed to work as a complete skin care system, leaving your skin feeling soft, smooth and nourished. I recommend starting with Cindy's Full regimen which contains all five of her best selling products including the amazing Youth Activating Melon Serum. This next generation serum has the power of Melon Leaf Step Stem Cell technology. It's melon leaves stem cells encapsulated for freshness and released onto the skin to support a visible reduction in the appearance of wrinkles. With thousands of glowing five star reviews, why not give it a try? Subscribe today and you can get the Amazing Meaningful Beauty system for just $49.95. That includes our introductory five piece system, free gifts, free shipping and a 60 day money back guarantee. All of that [e-mail].

[Danielle Robay]

Just like great shoes, great books take you places through unforgettable love stories and into conversations with characters you'll never forget.

[Richard Reeves]

I think any good romance, it gives me this feeling of like butterflies.

[Danielle Robay]

I'm Danielle Robaix and this is bookmarked by Reese's Book Club, the new podcast from hello Sunshine and I Heart Podcasts. Every week I sit down with your favorite book lovers, authors, celebrities, book talkers and more to explore explore the stories that shape us on the page and off. I've been reading every Reese's Book Club pick, deep diving book talk theories and obsessing over book to screen casts for years. And now I get to talk to the people making the magic. So if you've ever fallen in love with a fictional character or cried at the last chapter or passed a book to a friend saying you have to read this, this podcast is for you. Listen to Bookmarked by Reese's Book club on the iHeartRadio app. Apple Podcasts are wherever you get your podcasts.

[Scott Galloway]

In. This notion of community versus, you know, of this disconnect that people are now, you know, deeply lonely that I imagine is at the core of why 80% of suicides are men. Is that it? I mean, is that the trend line? Or is it something deeper? Is it just self worth feeling worthless? Is it the fact that, you know, I, you know, I've no longer had value because, you know, my physical strength, my physical capacity is no longer the advantage in a sort of cognitive world in terms of the economic shifts and realities, is it? Or what is it? I mean, what, what are these? These suicide rates are jaw dropping.

[Richard Reeves]

Amazing. And I will say that the, the thing that I didn't know until we dug into it more recently was that it really swung to young men. So up until 2010 it was really middle aged men where we saw this rise in suicide, which I think was consistent with the story of deaths, of despair, what was happening in the economy and so on. But since 2010, the rise has basically all been among young men under 30 and we honestly don't really know why. But it's a huge rise and I'm Sure. It's connected to some of these conversations that you've been having around what I call neededness, for want of a better term. Yeah, I just think there's like I've come to believe that a human universal is the need to be needed and that feeling unneeded is in this case almost literally fatal. A very good study by Fiona Shand and her colleagues are looked at the words that men use to describe themselves before taking their own lives through suicide. And the two most commonly used to describe themselves were worthless and useless. We also know that the suicide rate among men goes up very significantly after a breakdown, marital breakdown or a separation. Does not go up for women, goes up a lot for men. So that gap gets even bigger. We know it's much higher for men who are not employed. We know it's much higher for men who, as you just indicated a minute ago, disconnected, isolated. And so what's happening, I think is that too many men aren't sure that they're needed. They're not sure that the economy needs them, they're not sure that their family needs them, they're not sure their community needs them. And so we've got to find a way to supply that sense to many men that we still need you. We need you. And I've actually been struck. This is something again I learned recently is that there's a huge lack of men volunteering in many civic institutions. So I just signed up to be a big brother. I'm a big fan of Big Brothers, Big Sisters. And now that I've empty nested, maybe I'm also trying to fill a hole in myself too. But I was shocked to discover that the waiting list for boys where I live in East Tennessee for a big is 12 months. For girls, it's three months because they have at least as many boys being referred as girls. And they have so few male volunteers. And I look around and people should look in their own area and they will almost certainly discover that there is a massive shortage of male bigs. And so big brothers, Big sisters is becoming big sisters by default because of a lack of male volunteers. And at the same time we have a lot of men who maybe lack some structure and purpose in their lives. And so there's got to be a way to make that call, but it has to be to men. That's the thing that sounds a bit socially conservative about this, which is that I think you've got to make a specific call which is like, guys, we need you. We don't just need volunteers, we need some guys for this. If guys are told like we need guys, they're much more likely to turn up. And we could argue forever about why that is, but it just seems to be true. And so there's something quite deep in our culture here. As men, we like as fathers. That's obvious, maybe in the workplace, but if we start to doubt whether the tribe needs us, I think we fade away.

[Scott Galloway]

Do you assign these trend lines to deinstitutionalization? The conversations we're having today around reshoring and manufacturing, are you seeing these trend lines globally along those same lines? Is it now because we're online more and it's algorithms that it's getting exacerbated? What, I mean, what are the, what are the sort of. Or is it just the ascendancy of, of the feminist movement and, and sort of that friction, that dialectic that's, you know, that we're not expressing or at least discussing as much? What, what do you attach this to?

[Richard Reeves]

Yeah, I mean, am I allowed to say yes to all of the above? Right?

[Scott Galloway]

Yeah, a little bit of everything.

[Richard Reeves]

A little bit. But I do think that the way I think about this is that if you think of the culture as like a kaleidoscope, I think it's been shaken very significantly and the pieces have not settled again yet. And some of those, some of the forces that have shaken our culture have been really good, like the economic rise of women, which you mentioned earlier. Now, the economic rise of women is a profound fact about modern societies. It is a wonderful thing. And it has also massively destabilized the way we think about male and female role. And we've got to acknowledge that if we want to keep making progress. I think a big thing here is you can have a huge step forward which still has some turbulence around it. So finding a way to take men with us on this journey, that's huge. But as you just referred to, it's also true that while that was happening, that deindustrialization, some of the issues around trade just disproportionately hit working class men. So that's happened at the same time. And then right towards the end of this period, we're seeing the rise of online culture. Now we focus a lot on the negatives of online culture. I sometimes wonder about the potential positives because in almost all of human history, having more men who don't have that much to do, have time on their hands has predicted much higher crime rates and much higher social unrest that seems to. It's almost like a fixed law of societies. Right. That hasn't happened this time. And I think it's plausible to suggest that that might be because the men have something else to do with gaming, with pornography, with whatever the online content is, et cetera. And so now, I'm not arguing in favor of those things when I say this, but it is nonetheless striking that these trends in young male, particularly young male disengagement, which would almost automatically produce higher crime rates in every other area because they'd be kicking around on the streets, they'd be trying to figure out what to do, they'd be getting into fights, they'd be like, that's not happened. And so in some ways, what's happened instead is a male retreat. And so I've ended up being more worried about the men who are checking out than the men who are acting out. Now, of course, the men who act out get all the headlines. And I don't in any way want to diminish the problems around men acting out. But I see a much deeper problem here, which is that just this withdrawal, this retreat, this passivity that many men feel because they can retreat to this online world, which wasn't there. Wasn't there when I was growing up, or when you were growing up in the same way, but it is there now. And so what it gives men is an alternative world to escape to. And the question is, why are so many of them wanting to escape and that.

[Scott Galloway]

I mean, it's a rhetorical question for you. I mean, why is that then? I mean, is what. What I mean, it's good. Well, let's. I mean, this is an opportunity, obviously, to segue into what we need to do. But I mean.

[Richard Reeves]

But why.

[Scott Galloway]

I mean, again, is there any. Is it. Is it just these larger trend lines? I mean, what is there. Is there sort of a moment that marks. I mean, or is it just this longer shift? It's decades in the making? I mean, or can you literally mark, is there a cultural moment that really sort of where you saw this trend accelerate, this trend line became this headline?

[Richard Reeves]

The way I think about this is that you see these cultural trends happening relatively slowly in terms of a human lifespan, happen over decades, but they're like the tectonic plates shifting around, and then you'll get. Once they hit a certain point, then you'll get the earthquake or the volcano, but beneath the surface, and this is very much your state, so you understand this better than most governors. The ground is moving beneath the surface. This. And then that will create this kind of eruption. I think the ground has been shifting for at least half a century. It's been shifting economically with a shift away from blue collar, male favored jobs. It's been shifting in terms of the relative position of men and women, with women going from being essentially economically dependent on men to being economically independent to a very large degree. And in the education system, we've seen this massive reversal of the gender gap so that boys and men are now way behind women and girls when they leave school or when they leave college. I mean, at college now there's a bigger gender gap on college campuses today than There was in 1972 when we passed Title IX. But it's the other way round. So about 60, 40 now, female, male. And so these things didn't happen overnight. They'd been building and developing. And then I think this online culture has intersected with this in one way. Just talked about to kind of give men a place to retreat to, which I think is bad in the long run, but also to start weaponizing, to use the term you used earlier, some of these grievances, some of these issues. And so I think it takes quite a long time to neglect issues that have been built, but I think they've been coming for quite a while now. It's just that they've broken through the surface now into our culture and into our politics in a way that's made them very hard to ignore. But I honestly think they've been building for many decades now.

[Scott Galloway]

So speaking of politics, I mean, obviously the Trump campaign did not ignore this space and I don't think they ignored it for, you know, four, eight years prior either. But they seem to have really been the beneficiary of more focus on young men on some of these trend lines. Obviously, the amount of time and energy the campaign spent targeting young men, targeting men broadly, that paid huge dividends. I think there was a 15 point shift from 41%, 56% men under 30 that that moved towards Trump campaign. What do you make of of his approach to these issues? Do you think they're cynical? Do you think he's approached it at least with a sensitivity, a recognition? And where do you think my party as Democrats sort of seem completely devoid of focus and energy? I was certainly not a focus at the dnc. I know we have a close acquaintance. At least I had a privilege of having him on the podcast. Scott Galloway, close friend of yours. Scott talked about the DNC and he talked about going on there, dnc, what we care about. And it was every single thing that's out there in the imaginable except 26% of the population that the DNC didn't seem to care about in at least at all. At least based on their own website and their own priorities and policy. What do you think of Trump's efforts in this space?

[Richard Reeves]

Yeah, so the way I think about this is that in politics, something almost always beats nothing. And what there was from the Democrats on issues around boys and Men was nothing. It was the sound of deafening silence on these issues. And that's been true for a while. And I think for the reasons that we identified earlier, which is that the Democrats were very determined to be seen, particularly by women, as the party that were supporting them. And they felt that any moves to acknowledge the issues, the challenges of boys and men, would somehow undermine their claim to be the party for women. I think that was a fatal miscalculation. I also think, honestly, it was somewhat insulting to women because there are plenty of women out there, and we may know some in our own lives, Governor, who are simultaneously worried about the issues facing women. Access, for example, to reproductive health care, justice at work, and they're desperately worried about their son's mental health, and they're very worried about their brother's job. And so a party that managed to do both, I think, would have been pretty unstoppable. But there was nothing on the Democrat side. On the Republican side, there was really. I would just put it as meeting men where they were, especially young men. And if you look at recent work from David Shaw, the Democrat pollster, it's very striking that it wasn't just like men under 30, it was men under 20, it was men under 23. The younger the men were, the more they swung. And I think that is partly because that's the micro generation who grew up with terms like toxic masculinity and mansplaining and the women's movement, they. Toxic masculinity was only invented, really, in 2016 for public use. But if you were 20, if you. That you could, you were 10 when that happened. If you were voting for the first time in 2024, you were in high school when that happened. If, if you were 24 when you were voting. So I think what's happened was that there was this sense of young men coming up for grabs. They didn't hear anything from Democrats. And in the end, I think the Republicans did a better job of signaling to young men, we like you, we like the stuff you like, and we are going to go to the places you go, like the podcast. And so I think they met young men where they were both culturally and in terms of communication strategy, they didn't have anything to offer them by way of policy. This wasn't a policy referendum. And in fact, my work suggests that the views on policy among young men haven't really changed. This wasn't a policy win, it was a cultural win. The Republicans managed to convince young men the we see you and we like you. And I don't think there was anything more to it than that. But I don't think the Democrats did a very good job of making young men feel the same way. If anything, Democrats struggle with the idea that men might have problems because too many of them are still convinced that men are the problem. And until Democrats get past that, until they can acknowledge that there are real problems facing boys and men and issues facing women and girls, they just couldn't get past the zero sum, just as we don't. It's very frustrating, especially when Tim Walsh came on the ticket. I had this fantasy speech in my head where Tim Walsh would go out and talk about the need for first public school teacher to run for such high office coach. I had a speech he was going to give and it was going to be all about the things we're going to do for women as the Democrats, he said, but you know what? I'm very worried about the 10% decline in the share of male teachers. I'm very worried about the decline in male sports. I'm very worried about the lack of male coaches. I'm very worried about the rising suicide rate among young men. And I, as a Democrat, I'm going to set out this agenda to help young men and to help men as well as our agenda to help young women. And I've got to tell you, I don't think very many people would have hated that. But there wasn't even a hint of that from the Democrats.

[Gavin Newsom]

What does feeling safe at home really mean to you? For many, it might seem that having good locks and maybe an alarm that would, you know, make a lot of noise if somebody actually broke in. True security takes more a system that works to prevent that break in, that violation of your space from ever happening in the first place. Simplisafe is trusted to protect homes and families. It's about security that is proactive, not just reactive. Most security systems only take action after someone breaks in. That's too late. Simplisafe's new active guard Outdoor protection helps stop break ins before they happen. AI powered cameras, plus live monitoring agents detect suspicious activity around your property. If someone's lurking agents talk to them in real time, turn on spotlights and can call the police proactively deterring crime before it starts. No contracts, no hidden fees. Named Best Home security system of 2025 by CNET 4 million plus Americans Trust SimpliSafe ranked number one in customer service by Newsweek and USA Today Monitoring plans start around $1 a day 60 day money back guarantee. Visit simplisafe.com Gavin to claim 50% off a new system with a professional monitoring plan and get your first month free. That's simplisafe.com Gavin there's no safe like SimpliSafe.

[Unknown]

Let's be real. Life happens. Kids spill, pets shed and accidents are inevitable. Find a sofa that can keep [e-mail] Starting at just $699, our sofas are fully machine washable inside and out so you can say goodbye to stains and hello to worry free living. Made with liquid and stain resistant fabrics, they're kid proof, pet friendly and built for everyday life. Plus, changeable fabric covers let you refresh your sofa whenever you want. Neat flexibility. Our modular design lets you rearrange your sofa anytime to fit your space, whether it's a growing family room or a cozy apartment. Plus, they're earth friendly and trusted by over 200,000 happy customers. It's time to upgrade to a stress free mess proof sofa. Visit washablesofas.com today and save that's washablesofas.com offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply with comprehensive reports on.

Local schools you won't find anywhere else. Homes.com is the only place to find the in depth info home shoppers want Very in depth info. Curious about where a spot school ranks in the state? Look no further. Percentage of teachers in their first or second year? We've got it. Lowest student teacher ratio? No problem. The best cafeteria lunch in the district for your nine year old food blogger. Would it surprise you if we said yes? Homes.com we've done your homework.

[Cindy Crawford]

Now I'd like to introduce you to Meaningful Beauty, the famed skincare brand created by iconic supermodel Cindy Crawford. It's her secret to absolutely gorgeous skin. Meaningful Beauty makes powerful and effective skin care simple and it's loved by millions of women. It's formulated for all ages and all skin tones and types and it's designed to work as a complete skin care system, leaving your skin feeling soft, smooth and nourished. I recommend starting with Cindy's full regimen which contains all five of her best selling products including The Amazing Youth Activating Melon Serum this next generation serum has the power of melon leaf stem cell technique technology. Its melon leaves stem cells encapsulated for freshness and released onto the skin to support a visible reduction in the appearance of wrinkles. With thousands of glowing five star reviews, why not give it a try? Subscribe today and you can get the Amazing Meaningful Beauty system for just $49.95. That includes our introductory five piece system, free gifts, free shipping and a 60 day money back guarantee. All that [e-mail].

[Danielle Robay]

Just like great shoes, great books take you places through unforgettable love stories and into conversations with characters you'll never forget.

[Scott Galloway]

I think any good romance, it gives.

[Richard Reeves]

Me this feeling of like butterflies.

[Danielle Robay]

I'm Danielle Robaix and this is bookmarked by Reese's Book Club, the new podcast from hello Sunshine and I Heart Podcasts. Every week I sit down with your favorite book lovers, authors, celebrities, book talkers and more to explore the stories that shape us on the page and off. I've been reading every Reese's Book Club pick, deep diving booktok theories and obsessing over book to screen casts for years. And now I get to talk to the people making the magic. So if you've ever fallen in love with a fictional character or cried at the last chapter or passed a book to a friend saying you have to read this, this podcast is for you. Listen to Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Scott Galloway]

Boy, I mean you really hit me when you, you say of all the people that could have done it so effectively, Tim could have done it, I mean extraordinarily well with not only his bio in the military as well, but his, his, the person he is, there's sort of, there's a sweetness, a softness, there's a decency inherent in him. There's not an edge. People are not put off by Tim. They, they feel, they, they want, he's a guy you want to support and his capacity to deliver that message would have been profound. I couldn't agree with you more. I really, I, I appreciate that insight. So look, that begs the question and you made the point and I appreciate you making the point because I, I was curious your thoughts of whether not Trump and Trumpism sort of reflects a policy shift as opposed to sort of attaching themselves to the cultural shift and identifying the issue, but not necessarily advancing policy to solve them. You've advanced a number of Principles, a number of ideas to solve. And one of them reflected in that speech you just mentioned. I mean, the importance of having young male teachers, the importance of having mentors, the importance of focusing on issues related to vocational training, the opportunities to find more areas for service and contribution, to find meaning and purpose and mission in one's life, the issues around mental health. Tell me more about those areas and tell me about this frame that you've put together called heal, to sort of attach the STEM framework as it relates to getting women and girls in the STEM field. You want to focus on. On this thing called H E A.

[Richard Reeves]

L. Yes, yes, thank you. So most people know what STEM is by now. Science, technology, engineering and math. What many people don't know is that it originally wasn't going to be called that. It was going to be called Smet S M E T. And then Judith Ramilly at the National Science foundation said, can I call it stem? And they said, sure, whatever, Judith. And the rest is history. But you're right that we've made huge efforts both to invest in stem, but also to get more women into stem. And we have much further to go, especially in the area of technology. But we have tripled the share of STEM workers that are female, up to about 27% now in the US compared to the 1970s. That's not an accident. That was a result of concerted public policy, as you know, of getting into middle schools, of scholarships, of various advocacy groups to really get more women into those professions and to start seeing them as professions that were for them. But heel jobs are those that are in health and education and requiring more literacy skills than math skills. Not just written literacy, but kind of emotional literacy, verbal communication. And so those would be jobs like teaching, nursing, healthcare assistants, social work, mental health professionals, etc. And what's really striking about that is that the share of men in those fields has actually gone down. So the share of women in those STEM jobs has gone up, but we have fewer men in those heel jobs. So as I mentioned a moment ago, declining share of male teachers, it was 33% when Tim Walsh was the teacher, was the male share. Now it's 23% and falling and continues to fall. And there is yet to be a sustained public policy effort to do anything about that. I'm pleased to see some governors. I know you're interested in it. I've seen Gretchen Whitmer and Wes Moore and others really start to talk about this issue. You mentioned Josh Hawley a moment ago, who wrote his own book on this to be fair, the one thing that he agreed with me on was this, that actually it would be good to get more men in our classrooms. And so if you've got Josh Hawley on board on one side, and the American Psychological association, quite a progressive organization, also saying that's a big tent to work with, or I can work with that. If I've lost everybody to the right of Hawley and everybody to the left of the apa, I can live with that. But it's also true in mental health care. Like, so the share of men in social work, or I should say the share of social workers who are male is now 20%. It was, it was 40% in the 70s. The share of psychologists that are male is 20%. It was more than 50% in the 70s. And so we are cratering the share of men in education and in mental health care just at a point in our history where we're so worried about education, especially for boys, and we're so worried about mental health care and where we have this rising suicide rate among men. I think representation really matters in those fields, and gender is part of that story. There are other kinds of representation, too. But I'm going to get out on a limb here and say I think that if the teaching profession, social work profession, psychology profession were becoming all male, you'd be reading about it and we'd be acting on it. We would not think it was a good idea. Isn't it true the other way around as well? And again, people are worried that they somehow, oh, this is about men. When I wanted therapy, when my son wanted therapy, it was really great to be able to find a male. Not for everything and not for everybody. But I do think it should be an option to be able to find men. And the other thing is those fields need workers. There are labor shortages, and it's not a very good idea to try and solve a labor shortage with half the workforce. And there are jobs. So if we can, if we can do for heal these health and education jobs for men, what we did for women into stem, put the same kind of effort on that would, I think, be a huge win. It would actually be a win, win, win. It would be a win for the professions who need workers. It would be a win for the people using our schools and hospitals and mental health professions who would see themselves reflected in it. And it would be a win for men, many of whom are kind of looking for jobs now. And so I'd love to see a concerted policy effort really learning the lessons from women in stem around these jobs, we can't have the gender, the degendering of the labor market only go one way. I don't think we should be relaxed about that. I'm certainly not relaxed about the cratering share of men in those professions. And I don't think any policymaker should be.

[Scott Galloway]

It's interesting and I appreciate all of the above and hear you loudly and clearly and my day job and my responsibility as governor to call that out and, and be more intentional in that space as well. You also are very intentional and you've called out the importance of, of, of looking at men, fathers, in the context of paid parental leave. Tell me more what your thinking is along those lines in terms of just. And we didn't talk about fatherlessness. We didn't get into that issue necessarily. But I imagine in relationship to being a parent and a provider, not just being a protector, but back to being a provider is not just about economic issues as it relates to being a breadwinner, but also at home and making sure that you're providing for the family in terms of that care.

[Richard Reeves]

Yeah. And it speaks a bit to your wife's concerns too about the division of labor that we have around kids. I mean, the main reason for the gender pay gap now is the care gap is, is that women are just doing much more of the care than men. And I'm not suggesting that's going to go away overnight or that people shouldn't be free to choose whatever they want, but I don't think policy should be inadvertently supporting these gender roles. And so what that means is that if you have paid leave, you should have paid leave for mothers and fathers independently available to each of them. If we really think that dads matter, and I do, then we've got to be saying that through policy. And it's really interesting. When I brought my book out, I made the proposal that mums and dads should each get six months of paid leave at a very high replacement rate. And one of my friends says, what are you, European? And I said, well, actually by background I am, but I get it, it's wildly utopian. But guess what? Under the Biden administration, the US military introduced three months paid leave separately for mothers and fathers. And so maybe we could try the same for civilians. And the key point for me here is a paid leave is such an important policy. And California, of course, is very strong state level policy, which I'm sure you're very proud of, the US doesn't, but a lot of this is at state level. But it's very important both in the way that the policy designed and the way that it's marketed and sold and described, that it's not seen as maternity leave, just called parental leave or paid leave. It's got, we've really got to ensure that fathers feel like this is for them as well and design it so that it's for them too. If we want more gender equality at work, we need more gender equality at home. And we also need more dads involved in their kids lives. And there are lots of things it's hard to do through policy. Right. Maybe many of the things we've talked about today, there's no obvious policy solution, but paid leave for dads is a policy solution that works. They have more egalitarian relationships with their partners, they are more involved with their kids lives years later. And so there is a policy, it's a pro male policy that's on the table and that is one that should be being supported by most people, certainly on the Democrat side. But it should be being sold as a pro male, pro dad policy and it currently isn't being sold that way.

[Scott Galloway]

Well said. And it sure as hell by definition a pro family policy in terms of strengthening that family bond. Well, Richard, thank you for sort of, you know, strengthening our attention to this critical issue. And I'm just, you know, I've been really inspired not only by your work, but by sort of the rediscovery of your work because you've been at this for some time and, and to see all the energy and support that you're getting to have the opportunity to dialogue with Scott Galloway and the work he's doing highlighting this space. I mean, it really is a call to arms. This is not political, this is about community. This is about who we are. It's about the commonwealth more broadly. And so I really want to just thank you for, for being such a powerful voice in that space. But also sharing that voice was with us here today. So thank you for being on the podcast.

[Richard Reeves]

Thank you, Governor.

[Gavin Newsom]

Oral health goes beyond just aesthetics. It's deeply connected to your general health and well being. That's why preventing oral health problems before they start is so important. When you use the Colgate Total active prevention system, you're not just helping to prevent oral health problems like cavities and gingivitis. You're laying the groundwork for overall wellness. Colgate Total's three product routine includes a reformulated toothpaste, an innovative toothbrush and a refreshing antibacterial mouthwash that all support a healthy mouth in fact, the three products were designed to work together to be 15 times more effective at reducing bacteria buildup in six weeks starting from week one compared to a non antibacterial fluoride toothpaste and flat trimmed toothbrush. Take control of your oral health and get the Colgate Total Active Prevention System today so you can be dentist ready. Visit shop.colgate.com Total.

[Richard Reeves]

Hull up.

[Gavin Newsom]

We got one play.

[Unknown]

Everything we work for comes down to this Quick question. Speaking of workouts, how would you rate your athletic program?

[Gavin Newsom]

Bro, we're in the middle of the state championship.

[Unknown]

Oh, so like a B plus then? Dude, get out of our huddle. Well, at holmes.com, we leave it all on the field to get you detailed information on local schools. Off off the field copy. All right. Go sports. How'd he even get in here? Holmes.com Bingo. We've done your homework.

[Danielle Robay]

Just like great shoes, great books take you places through unforgettable love stories and into conversations with characters you'll never forget.

[Richard Reeves]

I think any good romance, it gives me this feeling of like butterflies.

[Danielle Robay]

I'm Danielle Robay and this is bookmarked by Reese's Book Club, the new podcast from hello Sunshine and iheart Podcasts where we dive into the stories that shape us on the page and off. Each week. I'm joined by authors, celebs, book talk stars and more for conversations that will make you laugh, cry and add way too many books to your TBR pile. Listen to bookmarked by Reese's Book Club on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown]

The Stuff youf Should Know guys have made their own summer playlists of their must listen podcasts on movies.

[Richard Reeves]

It's me, Jo.

[Unknown]

Like to welcome you to the Stuff youf Should Know Summer Movie Playlist. What screams summer more than a nice darkened air conditioned theater and a great.

[Richard Reeves]

Movie playing right in front of you?

[Unknown]

Episodes on James Bond, special effects, stunt men and women, disaster films, even movies that change filmmaking, and many more. Listen to the Stuff youf Should Know Summer Movie Playlist on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Richard Reeves]

So what happened at Chappaquiddick?

[Unknown]

Well, it really depends on who you talk to.

[Richard Reeves]

There are many versions of what happened in 1969 when a young Ted Ken drove a car into a pond and left a woman behind to drown. Chappaquiddick is a story of a tragic death and how the Kennedy machine took control.

[Gavin Newsom]

Every week we go behind the headlines and beyond the drama of America's royal family.

[Unknown]

Listen to United States of Kennedy on.

[Richard Reeves]

The iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever.

[Cindy Crawford]

You get your podcast.

[Danielle Robay]

This is an iHeart podcast.