And, This is Speaker Newt Gingrich

Summary

Podcast Summary: This is Gavin Newsom – Episode: And, This is Speaker Newt Gingrich
Release Date: May 28, 2025
Host/Author: iHeartPodcasts

---

Introduction

In this engaging episode of "This is Gavin Newsom", California Governor Gavin Newsom hosts former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich for a candid conversation addressing some of the most pressing political and national security issues of the day. The dialogue delves deep into topics such as the Ukraine conflict, the legacy of Donald Trump, defense reform, and the future of American innovation and governance.

---

1. Ukraine Conflict and Putin's Strategy (02:55 - 07:20)

Governor Newsom initiates the conversation by acknowledging Newt Gingrich's recent tweets concerning Ukraine and President Vladimir Putin. Newsom appreciates Gingrich's assertive stance on not underestimating Putin's strategies and emphasizes the need for a muscular response against Russian aggression.

Notable Quote:

Gavin Newsom (03:00): "You thought Putin would slow down? He's proving otherwise."

Gingrich responds by dissecting Putin's tactics, emphasizing the long-term strategic patience and the cultural divergence between Russia and Western nations. He critiques the current discourse, arguing that it's time to shift from understanding Putin as a Western figure to recognizing him as a distinct Russian persona with different cultural motivations.

Notable Quote:

Newt Gingrich (05:00): "We're dealing with a Russian figure, not a Western one. Russia's culture is fundamentally different from Western Europe."

---

2. Strategic Defense and Sanctions (05:36 - 07:44)

The discussion shifts to strategic defense measures and the imposition of sanctions against Russia. Gingrich outlines four major recommendations:

1. Increase Weapons Supply: Providing Ukraine with advanced weaponry capable of reaching Russian territories.
2. Authorize Fighting Within Russia: Empowering Ukrainian forces to operate inside Russian borders.
3. Severe Oil Sanctions: Targeting Russia's primary revenue source by crippling oil sales.
4. Impound Ships Carrying Illegal Oil: Enforcing strict measures against ships transporting Russian oil, thereby dismantling Putin's evasion tactics.

Gingrich also touches upon the significant amounts of Russian funds held in the West, advocating for redirecting these assets to support Ukraine, despite potential legal challenges.

Notable Quote:

Newt Gingrich (07:20): "If you own a ship and use it to carry Russian oil, you're going to lose the ship. We're going to impound it forever."

---

3. Trump's Political Impact and New Book "Trump's Triumph" (07:44 - 15:38)

Gingrich introduces his new book, "Trump's Triumph", scheduled for release on June 3rd. He positions former President Donald Trump among historical giants like Jackson, Jefferson, Lincoln, and FDR, highlighting Trump's unique ability to tap into the working-class sentiments and drive significant change in American politics.

Gingrich discusses how Trump's unconventional approach and business acumen have reshaped the conservative movement, arguing that Trump's actions and policies have earned him a legacy worthy of historical comparison.

Notable Quote:

Newt Gingrich (13:50): "If Trump dances well enough and wins the 2026 election, he'll earn a ticket to winning the 2028 election, placing him in a league with the great changemakers."

---

4. Innovation in Government and Defense Reform (27:36 - 51:42)

A substantial portion of the conversation revolves around the need for innovation and reform within the U.S. government and defense sectors. Gingrich criticizes the existing bureaucratic systems, emphasizing that large, inefficient organizations like the Pentagon hinder progress and innovation.

He advocates for:

• Streamlining Bureaucracies: Reducing the size and influence of outdated administrative systems.
• Embracing Entrepreneurial Change: Encouraging small companies and startups to contribute to defense and technological advancements.
• Modernizing Defense Strategies: Transitioning from traditional war-fighting to war-winning strategies that leverage modern technologies like AI, robotics, and drone warfare.

Gingrich underscores the importance of adaptability and agility in national security to effectively counter emerging threats in the modern battlefield.

Notable Quote:

Newt Gingrich (41:19): "We need to design war-winning strategies rather than just war-fighting strategies. It's about being agile and innovative."

---

5. Future Security and National Defense (47:03 - 51:42)

Gingrich delves into future security challenges, highlighting the evolving nature of warfare and the necessity for the U.S. to stay ahead through strategic innovation. He references historical battles to illustrate how failure to adapt can lead to significant defeats, drawing parallels to current military strategies.

He emphasizes the integration of emerging technologies and the need to rethink national security beyond conventional defense paradigms. Gingrich calls for a comprehensive review of national security policies to address threats like electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attacks and the surge in drone warfare.

Notable Quote:

Newt Gingrich (50:11): "Our current procurement system makes it difficult to be agile enough. We need entrepreneurial change akin to Silicon Valley's innovation."

---

6. Balancing Liberal Academic Institutions and National Interests (23:30 - 29:29)

The conversation touches upon the role of academic institutions in national development and security. Gingrich expresses concern over the perceived left-wing bias in universities, arguing that it stifles diverse ideas and undermines academic excellence.

He highlights the importance of American universities in advancing technological and scientific research, especially in competing with global powers like China. Gingrich raises questions about the balance between fostering international talent and safeguarding national interests, advocating for a more nuanced approach to immigration and academic collaboration.

Notable Quote:

Newt Gingrich (28:51): "American universities have been the breeding ground for China's technological advancements. We need to rethink how we balance openness with national security."

---

7. Reflections on Leadership and Governance (31:52 - 35:25)

Gingrich reflects on leadership qualities and the necessity for effective governance. He contrasts Trump's direct, action-oriented style with the traditional bureaucratic approach, emphasizing the need for common sense and efficient management in public institutions.

Discussing policy areas like healthcare and space exploration, Gingrich advocates for practical reforms aimed at reducing inefficiencies and promoting innovation. He criticizes the reliance on large corporations and bureaucratic inertia that impede progress in critical sectors.

Notable Quote:

Newt Gingrich (35:25): "If you take the Pentagon and turn two-thirds of it into a museum, you'd have a better defense system overnight."

---

Conclusion

The episode concludes with Governor Newsom expressing gratitude for Newt Gingrich's participation, highlighting the significance of their conversation in bridging political divides and fostering informed discussions on national priorities. The dialogue underscores the necessity for bipartisan efforts in addressing complex challenges facing the United States, from international conflicts to domestic governance and innovation.

---

Key Takeaways

• Strategic Response to Russia: Emphasizing a strong, multifaceted approach to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine.
• Historical Legacy of Trump: Positioning Donald Trump as a transformative figure with a lasting impact on American politics.
• Need for Government Reform: Advocating for streamlined bureaucracies and enhanced innovation within defense and public sectors.
• Balancing Academia and National Security: Addressing the complexities of international collaboration in academic institutions while safeguarding national interests.
• Future of Warfare: Preparing for evolving threats through technological advancements and strategic planning.

---

This detailed summary captures the essence of Gavin Newsom and Newt Gingrich's conversation, providing insightful perspectives on key political and national security issues without the inclusion of advertisements or non-content segments.

Transcript

[Gavin Newsom]

You're listening to an iHeart podcast.

[Newt Gingrich]

Did you know that parents rank financial literacy as the number one most difficult life skill to teach? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app for families. With Greenlight, you can send money to kids quickly, set up chores, automate allowance, and keep an eye on what your kids are spending. With real time notifications, kids learn to earn, save and spend wisely. And parents can rest easy knowing their kids are learning about money. With guardrails in place. Try Greenlight Risk free [e-mail] iheart Ch.

[Gavin Newsom]

Ch Chumba looking for excitement? Chumba Casino is here. Play anytime. Play anywhere.

[Claude]

Play on the train.

[Speaker]

Play at the store.

[Gavin Newsom]

Play at home.

[Speaker]

Play when you're bored.

[Gavin Newsom]

Play today for your chance to win and get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for?

[Speaker]

Don't delay.

[Claude]

Chumba Casino is free to play.

[Speaker]

Experience social gameplay like never before.

[Sinesta]

Go to Chumba Casino right now to.

[Claude]

Play hundreds of games, including online slots.

[Speaker]

Bingo, Slingo, and more.

[Claude]

Live the chumba [e-mail] no purchase necessary.

[Speaker]

VGW Group void where prohibited by law.

[Newt Gingrich]

21 + terms and conditions apply.

[Sinesta]

Find home wherever you roam at Sinesta Es and Simply Suites. Stretch out and enjoy homelike amenities for however long you need. And when you're a Sinesta TravelPass member, staying at Sinesta Es and Simply Suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades and more. Go to sinesta.com and book your stay and unlock their best rates with Sonesta Travel. Pass here today, Rome tomorrow. Join now at Terms and conditions apply.

[Newt Gingrich]

Wasn't that delicious?

[Speaker]

So good.

[Claude]

Your bill, ladies.

[Speaker]

I got it.

[Claude]

No, I got it. Seriously, I insist. I insisted first.

[Newt Gingrich]

Don't be silly.

[Claude]

You don't be silly.

[Wells Fargo]

People with The Wells Fargo ActiveCash credit card prefer to pay because they earn unlimited 2% cash back on purchases.

[Speaker]

Okay.

[Claude]

Rock, paper, scissors for it.

[Gavin Newsom]

Rock, paper, scissors.

[Claude]

Shoot.

[Gavin Newsom]

No.

[Wells Fargo]

The Wells Fargo Active Cash credit card. Visit wells fargo.com ActiveCash Terms apply.

[Claude]

Millions of people have turned to Claude, the AI assistant from Anthropic, because it just feels different. Where other AIs often sound a little robotic, Claude has been designed with special research that informs its character, meaning that Claude just gets it when it comes to empathy and emotional intelligence. That's why Claude has become the if you know, you know, choice for dating advice, career coaching, gathering your thoughts for those important life decisions, and more. Give Claude a try for free at Claude.com that's C-L-A-U--E.com and let us know how you feel the difference.

[Gavin Newsom]

This is Gavin Newsom, and this is Newt Gingrich. I just wanted, if I could just briefly up top. You sent out a couple of tweets over the last 24 hours specific to Ukraine, obviously, topical issue. And I appreciated, candidly, your. Your tweets, which were a little more assertive, pushing back on this notion that somehow time is our ally with Putin, that it's time to be a little more muscular, time to call him out. You also called out, I thought, an important fact that's not necessarily part of the discourse. He spent 21 years in Sweden. I mean, these guys have a longer view version of that was actually the Napoleonic Wars. Yeah, but.

[Speaker]

But it was Putin who said, look, we fought Sweden for 21 years. You think I'm going to slow down?

[Gavin Newsom]

You think I'm going to slow down? So tell me, I mean, what. Where are you in the over under? I mean, is. Is. You know, I appreciate your advocacy for Trump, et cetera, but I think you, I mean, as the revelation that he's waking up to this new reality that this is not something you can snap your fingers. Putin's a different kind of character.

[Speaker]

Well, I think that, first of all, he probably shares a lot of people's concern that if you push Putin too hard, you end up in a tactical nuclear war, and then maybe more so I think there's a. There's a dance around Putin that's a little more complicated than just yes or no. On the other hand, I think he actually believed from his first term when they'd had a pretty good relationship, although he had sent lethal weapons to Ukraine, he was much tougher than Obama had been, but he was pleasant, and they had no major fights. And I think he had in the back of his head that, look, we're reasonable. We can talk with each other. And it's taken him, I think, about five months to realize nothing Putin says matters. That what matters is what Putin does. And when he says to you, oh, I really like to get to a truce, but by the way, for the next three days, I'm going to bomb civilians. After a while, it begins to sink in. You know, it's the opposite of George W. Bush. I'll never forget the day Bush said that. He looked into Putin's eyes and he saw his soul. And I knew that was nuts, because you can't be a KGB lieutenant colonel, have a soul. So, I mean, the whole concept of, you know, somehow we try to make him a Western figure, he's not. He's a Russian figure. And Russia is a different culture than Western Europe.

[Gavin Newsom]

And so the idea of what secondary oil sanctions you're advocating for?

[Speaker]

Well, I mean, I'd advocate four big things, more weapons, faster. Something which the German minister, Prime minister said today that they'd agreed to, which is use the weapons in Russia. So you start causing him pain in.

[Gavin Newsom]

His territory, and this is the longer range weapons, allowing them more range.

[Speaker]

We've begun to give them weapons that can reach Russia. And of course, they have lots of. They're going to produce some astonishing number of drones this year. Yeah, I mean, what I think like a million five or something. I mean, you people forgot Ukraine used to be a major industrial center for the Soviet Union. There's a lot of engineers in Ukraine, a lot of hard working, smart people, and they now mobilize in fighting, I think. So second, you give them permission to fight inside Russia. Third, you apply very severe sanctions on particularly sale of oil, which is their only currency that they, they generate any hard currency with. And fourth, I would start picking up all of the ships that are carrying illegal oil and just literally let it be known worldwide. You know, if you, if you own a ship and you use it to carry Russian oil, you're going to lose the ship. We're going to basically impound it forever. And at that point, his method of hiding from the sanctions collapses, his ability to sell within the sanctions collapses. And then the other thing I would do, which has some legal implications, but I'm a historian, not a lawyer, so I don't worry about that, is I would take the 300 billion that is impounded in the west of Russia. I give it all to Ukraine.

[Gavin Newsom]

What has been the reticence of that? What's what? I mean, it's interesting that Trump didn't move more aggressively to do that. Or is it part of a tactical negotiation?

[Speaker]

State Department and Treasury will tell you there are all sorts of complicated questions about doing that, to which my answer in the Franklin Roosevelt tradition is, fine, let them fight it out in court. Take the money.

[Gavin Newsom]

I appreciate it. Well, that's a perfect segue into your new book, Trump's Triumph, because I think a lot of that is sort of reflected this notion of action and moving beyond process and having a more entrepreneurial mindset in terms of governance, et cetera. But let's frame this book. This book comes out on June 3rd. It's your. How many, Mr. Speaker, seriously, how many books have you written?

[Speaker]

Well, I'm told 44. So.

[Gavin Newsom]

And are you and you're, you're writing all these books. You, you actually write these books.

[Speaker]

You don't have ghost writings. I usually have help, but. But I write all these books.

[Gavin Newsom]

And this one, unsurprising that you'd come out with a book about Trump's triumphs. But, but you, but what surprised me a little bit is this notion that you place them as one of the five giants up there with Jackson and Jefferson and, and people like Lincoln and FDR himself. I mean, is that your, your current belief or is that one that reflects.

[Speaker]

I believe that since the summer of 2015, because I watched him do two things that were kind of amazing. One was tap into the deeply felt emotions of at least half the country. And particularly, and this is one of the great ironies that I know you're wrestling with, and I've heard you talk about it. You know, we're having this switch of which party is the working class party and which party is the elite party. Well, Trump intuited this. And people Forget he had 13 years of doing the Apprentice at NBC. He was a natural salesman and a natural showman. So his instinct was to go right for the blue collar worker. And he did two things. In August of 2015, Vince Haley, who's now the domestic policy director at that time, was working with us. And, and he walked in one day in August and said, you have to see the C SPAN coverage of Trump in Arizona because Trump is talking about illegal immigration. And then he invites the father of a young man who's been killed to come up on stage. And then Trump steps way back and allows this guy to have like five or ten minutes on stage. A willingness to give up the spotlight that most people watch Trump will think is not likely and that most politicians would find very scary to give control of the microphone to this person. And I watched the way, the dynamics of that. And then you may remember the very first debate Cliss and I were watching in our. In our living room, and there was the one where he got in this really nasty, I mean, embarrassingly personal fight.

[Gavin Newsom]

And was this the Megyn Kelly?

[Speaker]

Megyn Kelly? I mean, it was just. It was kind of like. Oh, I don't.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah, nothing about them. I look, candidly, I thought that was it. I thought it was over.

[Speaker]

They were racing to the bottom. And I think he got there first. And. Which is a line, actually, that a year later somebody would use to describe the fight with Hillary in the last month, that she was going towards the bottom, but we thought we could beat her to it. So, anyway, so we watched this debate, and everybody, I mean, Frank Luntz had a focus group. They all thought Trump had lost. Everybody, like, you know, everybody at our level thought Trump had lost watching these various online things. And he's at 70 and 80% out of 16. And I'm thinking, now, wait a second, there's a mismatch here between everyday Americans and the elites on a giant scale. And at that point, I decided that what you had was a phenomenon who had somehow tapped into a core desire of the American people that they wanted to have a leader who would profoundly change Washington. And in Trump, you had somebody who, by personality and by background, was pretty enthusiastic. I mean, he's always wanted to be a person of consequence. And, you know, if you're the guy who breaks up the rooseveltian system after 90 years, you get to be a person of consequence. And so it fit. It fit what the. His. What his particular half of the country wants. It fit what I think is a historic necessity as a conservative political leader. And it fit his personal desire to have a pride. He wondered, and it's very interesting. Think back to this. In terms of politicians you've known. His slogan wasn't Trump. His slogan was Make America great Again. So he was picking a topic bigger than himself within which he could grow. And I think after surviving the two assassination attempts, he really personally believes that God spared his life for the purpose of actually achieving that. So my point is not whether you like him or dislike him, but if you look at the great change agents, they really are Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln and FDR. And I think there's a 50, 50 chance. It's not a certainty yet. And I've told him all he did was he earned a ticket to the dance. Now, if he dances well enough and he wins the 26 election.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah.

[Speaker]

Then I'll earn a ticket to winning the 28 election. And if they then. Which will probably be JD Vance on our side. And if we get the Trump vice president is only 40 years old. If we get the Trump vice president on top of the Trump presidency, then he will be in a league with those guys.

[Gavin Newsom]

We're going to get to that, and we'll get to 26 in a second. But I want to go back a little bit.

[Speaker]

I'm not doing your show.

[Gavin Newsom]

No. And by the way, I realize you're.

[Speaker]

Only thinking about it.

[Gavin Newsom]

No. All I want to say is I'm grateful you're here. This is a hell of a thing that the two of us are having this conversation. So take me back. It's Interesting, you know, and you're absolutely right. And I appreciate, because we had Frank Luntz on. And I want to talk a little bit about what Frank talked about in a minute, a little bit going back, the Contract With America, et cetera. But. But Frank made that point about those focus groups. But I want to. I'm curious, your point of view then, with Trump. You must have known him tangentially, but you were the leader of the, as you said yourself a second ago, conservative movement. Here's a former Democrat, kind of all over the place. No strong ideological moorings necessarily. I mean, you must have been pretty distrustful early on. Were you of Donald Trump? You weren't.

[Speaker]

First of all, I've known Trump for a quarter century.

[Gavin Newsom]

Right. So you knew his politics, though he wasn't always aligned with you.

[Speaker]

I knew him back when he was a businessman. He was a very noisy businessman. And I'd read his two books, which I recommend. Everybody, if you want to understand Trump, you read the Art of the Deal and the Art of the Comeback. Comeback's the more important of the two.

[Gavin Newsom]

Because it opens up with some very telling lines, doesn't it?

[Speaker]

It's amazing. He opens up with, my property in Atlantic City is losing money. The economy is going down because of Iraq. I'm $900 million in debt personally to the banks. And my wife just called and said she wanted a div. And he has this great line. He says, this is the moment you either get depressed or you plan a comeback.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah.

[Speaker]

This book is about the. Which. Which also tells you a lot about how he survived the last four years.

[Gavin Newsom]

That's right.

[Speaker]

This is a guy who's resilient on a scale that is historic. We. We first talked with him. Plissa and I had breakfast with him in Des Moines, of all places, in February of 2015. And we talked about running for president because we'd run in 12. And learned the hard way that if the other guy has many millions more than you bet on the money. But I learned a lot about running for president.

[Gavin Newsom]

Even though you won easily, by any objective measure, you won all those damn debates.

[Speaker]

At least enough TV ads could undo the debates. For me. It was a wonderful learning experience, and I think in my willingness to take on the news media head on, I was probably a forerunner for Trump's invention of fake news. But we talked at length about running, and it was very interesting, and you could tell that he had now moved from. That would be an interesting thing to kind of a businessman thinking through what would it take, how much Would it cost? How would you structure it? And so I watched his development all through 15 and I, I wasn't particularly pro Trump at that point.

[Gavin Newsom]

Right.

[Speaker]

Frankly, if you remember, Jeb Bush was the front runner. Of course he had, he had the.

[Gavin Newsom]

Most money, 100 million in a pack.

[Speaker]

He had his father and his brother.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yep.

[Speaker]

He had nationwide name id. And watching Trump psychologically take him apart.

[Gavin Newsom]

Low energy, the case study.

[Speaker]

Well, he got so far inside Jeb's head that Jeb is running around New Hampshire in shorts, jogging. Now the average New Hampshireite regards the idea of a presidential candidate who's jogging has disqualification on ground just automatically, which was really unfortunate because Jeb's actually was a very good reform governor of Florida. But Trump just had this ability to somehow set the stage where you couldn't win. And it's a very unusual capability.

[Newt Gingrich]

Get this, adults with financial literacy skills have 82% more wealth than those who don't. From swimming lessons to piano classes. Us parents invest in so many things to enrich our kids lives. But are we investing in their future financial success? With Greenlight you can teach your kids financial literacy skills like earning, saving and investing. And this investment costs less than that. After school treat start prioritizing their financial education and future today with a risk free [e-mail] iheart greenlight.com iheart not everyone.

[Wells Fargo]

Who handles your personal information is going to be as careful as you are. And it only takes one mistake to expose it to hackers and identity theft. Maybe that's why there's a new victim of identity theft every five seconds in the United States. Fortunately, there's Lifelock. Lifelock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed or your money back. Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning Lifelock will reimburse you up to the limits of your plan. If you lose money due to identity theft. You can't control how diligent others are with your personal information. But with Lifelock you can help protect it. Act now and save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code iheart or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off terms apply.

[Sinesta]

Find home wherever you roam at Sinesta ES and simply suites. Stretch out and enjoy homelike amenities for however long you need. And when you're a Sonesta Travel Pass member, staying at Sinesta Es and simply suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades and more. Go to sinesta.com and book your stay and unlock their best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass here today, Rome tomorrow. Join [e-mail] Terms and conditions apply.

[Claude]

Wasn't that delicious?

[Speaker]

So good.

[Claude]

Your bill, ladies.

[Speaker]

I got it.

[Claude]

No, I got it. Seriously, I insist. I insisted first.

[Newt Gingrich]

Don't be silly.

[Claude]

You don't be silly.

[Wells Fargo]

People with The Wells Fargo ActiveCash credit card prefer to pay because they earn unlimited 2% cash back on purchases.

[Gavin Newsom]

Okay.

[Claude]

Rock, paper, scissors for it.

[Newt Gingrich]

Rock, paper, scissors.

[Speaker]

Shoot. No.

[Wells Fargo]

The Wells Fargo ActiveCash credit card. Visit Wells Fargo.comActiveCash terms apply.

[Claude]

Millions of people have turned to Claude, the AI assistant from Anthropic because it just feels different. Where other AIs often sound a little robotic, Claude has been designed with special research that informs its character, meaning that Claude just gets it when it comes to empathy and emotional intelligence. That's why Claude has become the if you know, you know, choice for dating advice, career coaching, gathering your thoughts for those important life decisions, and more. Give Claude a try for free at Claude.com. that's C-L-A-U-E.com and let us know how you feel the difference.

[Gavin Newsom]

So it's interesting. So I appreciate in 2015 you started, I mean, there was sort of the dance of sort of developing more of this formal relationship as it relates to the political. And so did you find him particularly policy driven then? Was he inquisitive in terms of tactics or policy?

[Speaker]

Look, he's talking about tariffs 40 years ago.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah, true.

[Speaker]

Talking about immigration. I mean, the whole. He's talking about the corruption of Washington. There are some basic themes. But what I was going to say though is, and this may help you understand where I'm coming from, Trump is not a conservative right. Trump is the best anti liberal politician of my lifetime. Better than Reagan. Reagan was the great conservative articulator. I sort of stood on his shoulders with the Contract With America and we came out of a formed philosophical background. Trump understands that the current system doesn't work and that the woke phase of the American left is totally destructive of the American system. This is my view, obviously. And therefore he is prepared to fight everybody I want to fight. Now the fact that he doesn't read Bill Buckley and he doesn't have a National Review subscription, I don't care because I know that instinctively he'll get up every morning and think, you know, what part of the left can I take apart Today and one day it'll be Harvard and another day it'll be the New York Times and another day it'll be some bureaucracy. But every day he will cheerfully go out and engage and tear apart the people who I think need to be torn apart. So I'm very happy to have a non conservative, anti liberal entrepreneurial activist with all the skills of a great businessman.

[Gavin Newsom]

Well, so at peril, I jump right into the book and get chapters and chapters ahead. He's also taking on things that you've championed. I mean you've highlighted in the book the importance of, of genomics and synthetic biology and discovery and in invest, you know, in R and D, the issues obviously with DARPA, etc. I mean, how concerning. Including, by the way, you just did a documentary with your wife on, of all things, four letter word for some of your friends, pbs. Very proud PBS to me. But on Journey to America on immigration. And so I'm curious, just that tension I get the sort of owning the lib and liberalism more broadly defined. But where do you, are you, where are you in this sort of calc.

[Speaker]

I think, I think when everything shakes out, let's start with immigration. Trump is as pro legal immigration as he is anti illegal immigration. I mean, two of his wives are foreign born. Yeah. His mother came from Scotland. You know, he's not going to jump up and down and, and he has said openly, I mean, he's come up with this idea of this five million dollar, you know, avenue to America.

[Gavin Newsom]

What happened to that?

[Speaker]

Well, I suspect it'll be implemented. He wants the money. I'm not sure his calculations are right.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah, no, that was a little generous.

[Speaker]

Enough people show up to make it a big deal. But I mean, but Canada, other countries have had very similar smaller scale example projects. There's no question that the most aggressive pieces of the Trump coalition would do things that I would regard as destructive. There's also no question if you look at, for example, the caliber of the people he's appointed at the center for Disease Control or the National Institute of Health. These are very smart, very senior people. I just had a conversation with the new head of NIH who clearly wants to clean out the underbrush. I say this as a guy who, while balancing the federal budget for four years in a row, the only time in 100 years we doubled the size of NIH while balancing the budget. There you go. So deeply in science. But I'll also tell you it's now a big, I mean it kept growing. So what we doubled was the baseline from which it just kept growing. And it's a big bureaucratic system with a lot of baloney. I mean, when you're paying 65% more than the grant so that Harvard or Stanford or somebody can pay for overhead, there's a lot you can do that doesn't hurt. Genuine reform. You, you also have a big problem which I don't know how they're going to solve. And that is they've gotten into this rope a dope system where people will file for a research project, not reach the conclusion because they have already filed for continuing. And if they reach the conclusion, they'd have to go out and find a whole new topic. Yeah, that's a fair amount of slowing down research by bureaucratizing it. So, I mean, I'm passionate about this stuff. I'll give you one other example. I am totally committed to space. I have been since in 1981 I introduced the Northwest Ordinance for the moon, saying that if you got to a certain population, you could apply for statehood, which at that time people thought was nuts. Now they still think it's nuts, but not quite as nuts.

[Gavin Newsom]

I remember you in the debates talking about space and we were wondering what the. You know, you were on the edge there. So you have been you 100% consistent.

[Speaker]

I'm just glad that Elon came along and made it doable. I mean, I'll give an example. When the starship actually gets settled down and works Properly, it has 33 engines, it produces 2.3 times as much thrust as the Saturn 5. The rocket went to the moon 2.3 times as much. So your choice is to go with the traditional NASA, spend an amazing amount of money and maybe get two people on the surface of the moon or this thing will lift a hundred people or 150 tons. So you could put 50 to 70 people on the moon in one bite. I mean, just boom.

[Gavin Newsom]

To your point, that requires nsf. It requires all of the innovation and entrepreneurial. I mean, it requires research institutions. It requires presumably institutions of higher learning as well. Are you concerned about what's happening in terms of those partnerships? I mean, just I think about Sandia Labs, Lawrence Livermore Labs. I think about all the R D that's happening with military and obviously with academia. I mean, are you concerned that there's a recklessness? I appreciate solving for issues of some abuse or some inefficiencies, but there seems to be a blunt approach.

[Speaker]

No, first of all, I think there is. And as a historian, I would argue that when you try to make change on this scale, you're going to have very sloppy margins that you, you, you cannot move slow enough to be careful or the old order will surround you and drown you. Hear you, you have, you have to be. Which means you're going to make mistakes and you're going to screw things up and you got to go back and fix them. At the same time, I would say I really, I worry about our greatest universities partially from, I suspect, the opposite of your view, which is partially, I think they're so left wing now that they're virtually totalitarian and that they create a groupthink that is really destructive. And yet at one point, just a generation ago, these were the greatest centers of learning on the planet. And it does worry me how do you keep the best of Harvard or the best of MIT or the best of Stanford or Berkeley while at the same time taking head on the kind of ideological groupthinking that has become literally almost totalitarian in its own willingness to have any competition of ideas. And I think that's a real challenge. And we don't. Truth is, we don't have a good answer.

[Gavin Newsom]

No, I mean, how do you square that circle specifically on this notion of the journey to America? And I want to talk to you about the timing of that. And by the way, congratulations, 90 minute documentary on PBS that's really a love letter to absorbing the best and the brightest in who we are as America. In the spirit of Reagan, he talked about the life force of new Americans, that language evocative of who we are. But now we're starting to talk about 2027 of the student body is international at Harvard, and you're basically saying, no, you don't need to apply. And they're opening up their arms and their wallets in places like China. How do we square that?

[Speaker]

I think it's, I think it's very hard. I'm, look, I, I, I, I think that there are two conflicting things going on and we don't talk about them very honestly. I think what's happened in much of Europe where the culture is literally being drowned should be a much greater alarm. And it's something you can't even talk about. But if you look at places in Britain or France or Sweden or neighborhoods in Brussels, you're seeing basically the end of Western civilization. So on the one hand you have to say, are there legitimate concerns about who comes here and why they come here? The other side of that is with the Chinese. A very great deal of China's technological advance has come from American universities where Chinese students Come learn a heck of a lot and go back home. And if China is our biggest competitor, which I think may turn out to be exaggerated a decade from now, nonetheless, for planning purposes, they're our biggest competitor. Do you really want Caltech and MIT to be providing the best Chinese scientists in the world so they can go back home? Those are topics that deserve a lot deeper and more conversation. And I think I'm perfectly happy to say that there will be pieces of the Make America Great Again movement that are going to have to go back and be fixed because they're going to be destructive. Some of them are just plain going to be wrong. I mean, I'm a very big advocate for science. I wrote a piece recently on why we should not cut science funding at NASA, for example, on the one hand, I'm totally in favor of wiping out the Space Launch System, which is stunningly expensive and has accomplished nothing. And by the way, you could probably pay for a decade of NASA science with the cost of the Space Launch System. So I think there are ways that there are good things we should protect, and that's going to lead to fights because you're going to have some people who are clumsy or sloppy or who ideologically are pretty cheerful about being ignorant. I mean.

[Gavin Newsom]

I mean, look, you talk about Doge in the book. You write about it rather, but you write about it very in laudatory terms. But you make the point you just made as it relates to if you're going to move fast, you're going to break some things. But this notion of iteration and time to move and speed. You even highlight old Peter Drucker talking about excellence and efficiency, which I appreciated. But I mean, what is your over under just, you know, Doge in particular, is it, you know, are you satisfied with the $2 trillion in savings?

[Speaker]

It will turn out to have at least two patterns. One is more noise than achievement.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah.

[Speaker]

And the other is that it will have exposed for us a number of things that were going on that are kind of astonishing and that you, you know, so you.

[Gavin Newsom]

On the one hand, condoms in Gaza, which, you know, turned out not to be the case. What do you mean?

[Speaker]

Well, for example, it's pretty clear that I think at least 10% of the UN refugee workers in Gaza were pro Hamas.

[Gavin Newsom]

Okay. That's separate. Separate. I'm just, I'm just, I'm lamenting on the sort of Orwellian notion of $50 million of condoms, which the president reminded me of in the Oval Office, which I told him was not true.

[Speaker]

There's A good Californian. I'm sure you fondly remember Reagan.

[Gavin Newsom]

I do. I. By the way, Mr. Speaker, I'm in his office every day. As a point of pride.

[Speaker]

That's right. Well, that's right. I mean, right there. Right there in the governorship. Well, every once in a while, Reagan would see something in the newspaper and it would click in his head. He would repeat it endlessly.

[Gavin Newsom]

I see where you're going now.

[Speaker]

Look, there's a great Rilke, who's a German poet, once said, if you drive away my demons, will my angels flee? Also, the challenge with a charismatic leader of Trump's power is there's 5 or 10% where you go, really? And then there's this other stuff that is amazing and historic, and you may not be able to separate the two.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah. Or. Yeah. I mean, I. I may have a different. I'm maybe 90. 10 of your 10.

[Speaker]

20. That's one of the reasons I wanted to do the show with you. I remember when we talked about Citizenville.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah.

[Speaker]

And all the ideas you had a decade ago, before you ran into the Sacramento bureaucracy.

[Gavin Newsom]

God bless.

[Speaker]

By the way. I still tell people that's a really worthwhile book.

[Gavin Newsom]

I appreciate you for saying that, by the way. I think so much. It's interesting. I reflected on our conversations and a little bit on that book as reading your book. I mean, you talk about governing, not just campaigning. You talk about issues around efficient and effective government and more novel. And I think what's always interested me about you is your willingness to lean into the future and talk about healthcare differently than others, as you did again here. Even highlighted my old friend Dean Ornich in terms of some of his work on wellness and prevention. These four P's, you talk about predictability and personalization in the healthcare space, but you also take on other spaces, which I appreciate as well, like the old Eisenhower frame on the military industrial complex. And I'm curious, in relationship to the Doge question, why do you think there's been so little willingness to enter into that space, even the. The space launch example you just gave?

[Speaker]

I think, you know, I had one fight in the first Bushes, Trump's first term, over Huawei, and what we needed to do to dramatically strengthen American telecommunications. And it's the one fight that I clearly decisively lost. And I lost it because AT T was on the other side. And AT T is so big, contributes so much money, has so many lobbyists, buy so many TV ads that, you know, I just. Just ran over me. It was. It was an exciting Experience. But I felt like a lot. I felt like the guy in Tiananmen Square. I mean the tank Christ. So I start with that. I mean, it is, I think the space launch system is one of the best examples of the sickness of the old order. And what Eisenhower did warn about, I mean, people should go back and read his farewell address because he's very clear. And this guy had been a five star general commander of allied forces in Europe as well as president. So he had pretty good knowledge. And he's saying correctly, in order to build a system big enough to defeat or contain the Soviet empire, you have to turn over so much money and power to a bureaucracy which will then hire big corporations that you're going to have the permanent danger that they grow together into sort of a single organism which then operates for its own benefit. And that's an enormous problem across the. It's a problem in health care too. I mean, big health in many ways is as bad as big defense. And I'm working on a paper right now which will amuse you when it finally comes out. Talking about Trump time and Trump savings and going back to the. The skating rink in New York City had, the rink had quit making ice, which makes it very hard if you're a skating rink. And the city had for six years tried to fix it, had spent $13 million. Trump talks about this in his first, in the book the Art of the Deal.

[Gavin Newsom]

This is one of his great successes. Yeah, objectively.

[Speaker]

And he says, you know, he's looking his, his apartment looks out over the rink, the woman rink. And so he finally gets so pissed off at six years they can't make ice. And he challenges the mayor publicly and says, you give it to me and I will fix it in less than a year for under three million dollars. Well, he fixed it in four months. And we came in 25 below budget. Now they already spent six and a half million. He came in 25 below the three million dollar budget, totally fixed in four months. And his, in the book, he has this great line where he says they had this firm in Florida that had won the contract and didn't know what they were doing. And so I said to myself, who builds skating rinks? I thought, Canadians. Excuse me. So he goes to the National Hockey League and says, who builds the skating rinks? And there's this firm in Montreal. And they fly down and they look at and they go, this is really embarrassing. This is so easy to fix. You can't believe it. And when he finally got it done, somebody said, what Happened. He said it wasn't magic. It was common sense and management. Well, to the degree that we could bring common sense and management, I think you could get better defense for 25% less than the current defense budget if you could clean out all the bureaucracy and all the cronyism and all the bad contracts. I tell every audience, if you took the Pentagon and turned it into a triangle, and took the other two thirds and turned it into a museum, you would get a better defense system overnight. And the reason is simple. You'll understand this as a governor of a state with a huge bureaucracy. They built the Pentagon in 1943 so that 26,000 people could manage World War II with carbon paper, manual typewriters and filing cabinets. And in fact, Marshall's chief of staff used to run drills to see how fast you could find paper if you needed a certain document. Where is it? How do you get there? Well, everybody in the Pentagon now has a smartphone, an iPad, a laptop computer. And I have never gotten. You might be able to get somebody at Caltech to figure this out. I've never been able to get an exchange rate. That is, if you have one person over here with a carbon paper distribution and one person over here with a smartphone, an iPad, or a computer, what's the relative exchange rate of information flow? My guess is it's above a million. Well, guess what, you have the same 26,000 people. Now, since they're not filing paper and they're not writing on carbon, what they're doing is writing each other to prove that their job is important so they can stay employed. So you screw up the whole system with person A writing person B, who writes person C, who then writes person A. And they beat these things to death. And exactly the way New York City was failing with the ice rink because you have a bunch of bureaucrats who write papers that have no meaning. And I, I think I helped found the Military reform caucus in 81. I helped pass the Goldwater Nichols reform in 86 against every active duty senior officer. None of them wanted it. Nowadays, I'll tell you, it's invaluable. We need a deep, thorough review of all of our national security, not just defense, all of it. If we're going to compete in the modern world.

[Newt Gingrich]

Get this. Adults with financial literacy skills have 82% more wealth than those who don't. From swimming lessons to piano classes. Us parents invest in so many things to enrich our kids lives. But are we investing in their future financial success? With greenlight, you can teach your kids financial literacy skills like earning, saving and investing and this investment costs less than that. After school treat start prioritizing their financial education and future today with a risk free [e-mail] iheart greenlight.com iheart Sonesta Travel.

[Sinesta]

Pass is the most rewarding way to travel. Sign [e-mail] for instant savings, bonus points and perks like early check in and late checkout, room upgrades and free stays. Choose from 1100 hotels across 13 brands and unlock their best rates when you book with Sonesta TravelPass here today, Rome tomorrow. Join [e-mail] that's sinesta.com terms and conditions apply.

[Claude]

Millions of people have turned to Claude, the AI assistant from Anthropic because it just feels different. Where other AIs often sound a little robotic, Claude has been designed with special research that informs its character, meaning that Claude just gets it when it comes to empathy and emotional intelligence. That's why Claude has become the if you know, you know choice for dating advice, career coaching, gathering your thoughts for those important life decisions, and more. Give Claude a try for free at Claude.com that's C-L-A-U--E.com and let us know how you feel the difference.

[Speaker]

Wasn't that delicious? So good.

[Claude]

Your bill ladies. I got it. No, I got it. Seriously, I insist. I insisted first.

[Newt Gingrich]

Don't be silly.

[Claude]

You don't be silly.

[Wells Fargo]

People with the Wells Fargo Active Cash credit card prefer to pay because they earn unlimited 2% cash back on purchases.

[Speaker]

Okay.

[Claude]

Rock, paper scissors for it.

[Newt Gingrich]

Rock, paper, scissors.

[Claude]

Shoot.

[Speaker]

No.

[Wells Fargo]

The Wells Fargo Active Cash credit card visit wells Fargo.com ActiveCash Terms apply for.

[Newt Gingrich]

Period protection you can put on and forget about nothing. Beats NYX Leak Proof Underwear North America's number one leak proof underwear brand. Let's face it, life can be unpredictable. But your leak proof underwear shouldn't be. That's why millions of people choose NYX for periods for light leaks. For everyday freshness, NYX undies are super comfy, super absorbent and made to handle whatever your day throws at you. Day two of your period covered your daily run. No problem. That big sneeze? You know the one? Yep. We've got you. And with styles like bikinis, boy shorts, thongs and high rise plus sizes from extra small to 4XL, NYX makes it easy to find your perfect fit. Say goodbye to stress and leaks and say hello to undies that work just as hard as you do. No matter the leak. Find the style and level of protection you [e-mail] and use code flow15 for 15% off. That's K-N-I x.com code flow15 for 15% off. Nix for your leaks, for your life.

[Gavin Newsom]

It just seems of all things. And you know, I appreciate the skating rig because it's a reminder of under promise, over deliver. And we can talk about some of those day one actions that Trump may or may not have succeeded with in a moment. But I'm curious as it relates to the issues of the Pentagon. I mean, Trump's been bold and he's provided a lot of space for Doge and certainly Musk in the last, you know, 100 days. But, but, but the Pentagon does seem to be off limits. I mean, is that, is that accurate?

[Speaker]

I don't think so. I think, I think they will presently be as ruthless at the Pentagon as they will be anywhere else.

[Gavin Newsom]

Interesting. F35 comes to mind.

[Speaker]

Huh? What?

[Gavin Newsom]

F35 comes to mind.

[Speaker]

Actually, I've gotten real pushback on that.

[Gavin Newsom]

Because I did you.

[Speaker]

I was, I was one of the people who was really critical.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah.

[Speaker]

But three or four people who, I'm writing this paper and I was talking about examples of cost overruns and I've had three or four people who do not work for Lockheed aren't part of the system, but they're very smart write back and say to me that is an inaccurate measurement, that if you actually look at the plane they have built, it has no relationship to the original contract, it is vastly superior, and the price has dropped now to about a reasonable price for the fifth generation fighter. I mean, I was shocked. I took it out of my paper because there were too many people writing me back and saying the other examples are terrific. This one's just dumb. That's not technically right. Interesting, because I would, a week ago I would have said to you exactly that.

[Gavin Newsom]

Yeah, no, it's sort of, it's, it's, we throw that one around.

[Speaker]

Now I'm getting beaten up by people who know a lot more than I do saying it now. There are, I have a lot of good examples in my paper, but that ain't one of them.

[Gavin Newsom]

That ain't one of them. Interesting. So, all right, so you're, you'll, you'll stipulate we should see some more. I mean, obviously the Secretary of State, Defense has done some personnel moves, etc, but they seem relatively modest compared to the overall reforms that, that you're advocating for. But, you know, one of the things I struck in the book, and again, unsurprising, is it's been a consistent theme with you is sort of anticipating the next war, not necessarily relitigating and reflecting exclusively on, on, on the last one. And the issues of electron, electronic emf, issues that you've been sort of focused on, issues of space in relationship to defense, etc. Talk to me a little bit about what you sort of posit or you least promote in this book as it relates to future security and national defense.

[Speaker]

I think there are three big things. The first is we need to quit talking about war fighting and think about war winning. The fact that we have great tactical capabilities and wonderfully courageous people who go for 21 or 22 years in a place like Afghanistan and don't win should bother us because war fighting is not the goal. War winning is the goal. And as Sun Tzu wrote, The group in 500 BC, the greatest of all generals win bloodless victories. So, you know, the question is, can America design a war winning series of strategies rather than a war fighting strategies? The second thing I would say is you have to look at all of national security. You mentioned, for example, the real threat of electromagnetic pulse attack. And a very close friend of mine, Bill Fortune, wrote a remarkable novel called One Second after, in which he shows you a village in North Carolina after electricity has been cut off by an electromagnetic pulse. I mean, it is a breathtaking book. He was actually invited to Sandia. You'd mentioned Sandia labs earlier. He was invited there by the physicists who were grateful that somebody could explain what they worried about and thought his book really was a very accurate projection. So you need to think about not just the Defense Department, but the totality of national security. And then in the Defense Department itself. I've begun writing something which only occurred to me by watching Ukraine. We are seeing an extraordinary change in the nature of warfare and none of us understand it yet. I'm actually going to write a paper on Poitier, Crecy and Agincourt, which are the three great battles in the Middle Ages where the British annihilate the French because the French cannot adjust. They have to be armored knights. Their culture requires it. And the British have developed a longbow which slaughters armored knights. And it takes place over a century. And in that entire period, their culture will not allow them to change. Well, we may have a similar problem. We like big, expensive, sophisticated, long to develop long to field systems. You're now up against, as I said a while ago, I think the numbers for next year, for this year for Ukraine are going to be 1,500,000 drones. Now most of them are small, most of them are simple. Most of our guys would look down their nose at him. But Lord Nelson, who won the battle of Trafalgar, set a 1 point numbers annihilate. And if you take the combination of artificial intelligence, robotics, 3D printing, new specialized kinds of chemistry, there's a firm in your state actually called Divergent, which is probably the most advanced factory on the planet, far ahead of anything in China. And they use those techniques to be able to shift what they make within a matter of hours. I mean, it's astonishing to visit them and they're in la, not far from an in and out burger. And they. I measure my trips to California.

[Gavin Newsom]

Trust me, a lot of people do. I'm one of them too.

[Speaker]

But anyway, when you start thinking about, for example, you don't just measure the Chinese warship Navy. All the Chinese merchant ships have been designed now for 20 years to be capable of launching drones. Well, if I have a ship and it happens to have 40 drones on it, is that an aircraft carrier or is that a merchant ship? And If I have 1800 of them, does that count as part of my navy or is that just an auxiliary group? And how many munitions does an American ship carry? And how many drones can it stop if the other guy is able to send endless quantities? I'm just giving you a flavor. Yeah, I don't think we realize yet. You know, I talked occasionally to the Amazon people about their use of robotics, which is part of the reason they've been able to be so amazing. We have no notion yet of how, how fast the modern battlefield is going to become and how complicated it's going to become. And our current bureaucracies and our current procurement system makes it very difficult to be agile enough. And frankly, excuse me, the dominance of these big corporations, the Lockheed's, the Boeings, what have you, Raytheon makes it very hard to have the kind of entrepreneurial change that you've seen in Silicon Valley for your entire lifetime.

[Gavin Newsom]

Right.

[Speaker]

You know, it's the small company today, that's the giant company in 20 years. And if you can't grow the small companies because they can't get through the Defense Department's paperwork, then you're not ever going to have the rate and rhythm of innovation that you need.

[Gavin Newsom]

No, I appreciate it. And that's something you highlight sort of that framework of iteration, the sandbox and procurement reform, which is so foundational. And it's really, it's about, you know, it's the incumbency racket you talk about incumbency capitalism versus innovation capitalism and that sort of innovation capitalism is, is a big part of what we focus on. And obviously I think it's part of the secret sauce. To your point of Silicon Valley, I'm curious, just going back a little bit and, you know, bouncing around a little bit here. But again, back to timing because Journey to America, you did it with your wife and you guys have done how many documentaries now? You've done 44 books.

[Speaker]

Done. We've done 10 movies and I've done 44 books. She and I have done, I think four or five of them together. She wrote six children's books about Ellis the Elephant and American history. I love it. Yeah. Well, it's interesting because, you know, she's a music major. She was a piano major, plays the French horn, spent 20 years in a professional choir at the Basilica in Washington. So that's her natural background. Then she was a clerk in the Agriculture Committee in the House. And she, you know, she works really hard. She works much harder than I do.

[Gavin Newsom]

And tune in for the rest of the conversation with Newt Gingrich.

[Wells Fargo]

Not everyone who handles your personal information is going to be as careful as you are. And it only takes one mistake to expose it to hackers and identity theft. Maybe that's why there's a new victim of identity theft every five seconds in the United States. Fortunately, there's LifeLock. LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity. If your identity is stolen. A LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed or your money back. Plus, all Lifelock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning LifeLock will reimburse you up to the limits of your plan if you lose money due to identity theft. You can't control how diligent others are with your personal information, but with Lifelock, you can help protect it. Act now and save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code iheart or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off terms apply.

[Sinesta]

Find home wherever you roam at Sinesta Es and Simply Suites. Stretch out and enjoy homelike amenities for however long you need. And when you're a Sinesta Travel Pass member, staying at Sonesta Es and Simply Suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades and more. Go to sonesta.com and book your stay and unlock their best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass. Here today, Rome tomorrow. Join [e-mail] terms and conditions apply.

[Claude]

Millions of people have turned to Claude, the AI assistant from Anthropic, because it just feels different. Where other AIs often sound a little robotic, Claude has been designed with special research that informs its character, meaning that Claude just gets it when it comes to empathy and emotional intelligence. That's why Claude has become the if you know, you know choice for dating advice, career coaching, gathering your thoughts for those important life decisions, and more. Give Claude a try for free at Claude.com that's C-L-A-U--E.com and let us know how you feel the difference.

[Newt Gingrich]

Get this Adults with financial literacy skills have 82% more wealth than those who don't. From swimming lessons to piano classes, us parents invest in so many things to enrich our kids lives, but are we investing in their future financial success? With Greenlight, you can teach your kids financial literacy skills like earning, saving and investing. And this investment costs less than that. After school treat start prioritizing their financial education and future today with a risk free trial at greenlight.com iheart com. Greenlight.com iheart.

[Claude]

Clorox Scentiva smells like lavender.

[Gavin Newsom]

Cleans like Clorox.

[Claude]

And feels like hmm.

[Newt Gingrich]

All right, that could go on for a while. Experience the long lasting freshness of Clorox Scentiva. Available in Clorox Scentiva Lavender Scented Bleach. Use as directed.

[Gavin Newsom]

You're listening to an iHeart podcast.