Leo Laporte (21:11)
Okay, folks, we're looking at you. We'll have more in just a moment with our fabulous panel. Our show today brought to you by Thinkst Canary. It is the best invention ever. I was just at RSAC for the first time meeting the thinx Canary team, Haroun and company. They are so great. They started life many years ago, more than a decade ago, as white hat hackers, pen testers. They would teach companies and governments how to break into systems. And one of the things they, they really learn is what hackers are looking for when they get into your system. And what you should be thinking about is, how would I know if somebody is inside my network browsing around, stealing stuff, planting time bombs? How would you know that? You assume your, your defenses are good and nobody's going to get in. But that's a bad assumption. That's why you need these thinxt canaries. They're honey pots that are easy to deploy. You can deploy them in minutes. They can be almost anything. They can even set up little trip wires. They call them canary tokens. These are little files you can spread around even in your cloud environment that are irresistible to hackers. I have a spreadsheet file that's called payroll information, for instance, on my Google Drive. Of course, I have the Things Canary. It's set up to look like a Synology nas, but it could be almost anything. A Windows server, a Linux server, a SharePoint server, Exchange server. It could be a SCADA device, it could be almost anything. The point of Them is they are irresistible for hackers. Hackers may even go, I don't know. But they're in there for that reason. I can't resist payroll information. That's gotta be good tax returns. But if somebody accesses those Lore files or brute forces your fake internal SSH server, your Thinks Canary will immediately tell you you have a problem. No false alerts, just the alerts that matter. And any way you want it. Email, text, they support Slack Webhooks, Syslog, of course they have an API any way you want it. But the key is when you get that alert, you know someone is doing something not good, they're trying to access that file. So you get your Thinks canaries, you choose a profile for the devices. It's so easy to set it up, you might change it every single day. Then you register it with a hosted consol for monitoring and notifications. And then you wait. Attackers who've breached your network, malicious insiders and other adversaries make themselves known simply by accessing your Thinks Canary or those lures. I love this idea. It's part of your overall security strategy. It has to be a big bank, might have hundreds of them. You certainly need one for every land segment, right? Small business like ours might have a handful. Here's the deal. Go to Canary Tools Twit. Canary Tools twit for just 7500 doll a year, you get five thinks Canaries, you get your own hosted console, you get upgrades, you get support, you get maintenance. And if you use the code Twit in the how did you hear about us box, you'll get 10% off the price for life. You can always return your Thinks canaries with their two month money back guarantee for a full refund. But I have to tell you that things Canary refund guarantee has never, not once been claimed. Visit Canary Tools Twit and enter the code Twit in the how did you hear about us? Box. Canary Tool Twit. We thank them so much for their support of this week in tech. Well, we talked about it. Last week there were two big court decisions against social media. The state of New Mexico with a big multi hundred million dollar fine against Meta. And then in Los Angeles, a young woman sued saying I started using Instagram at the age of six and and or YouTube at the age of six, Instagram at the age of nine. It caused severe mental health problems. The case in LA was interesting because they went after Meta. By the way, Snapchat and TikTok were also named in the suit. Settled out before the case went to jury went to trial, but YouTube and Meta fought the case and lost. It was really a product defect case. The claim from the plaintiff was these products were poorly designed, encouraging me, addicting me, and as a result they're liable. It wasn't a big, it was only a few million dollar penalty. The jury said we didn't. The point was we wanted them to fix it. We weren't trying to hurt them, we were trying to get them to fix it. And of course we're all waiting now for the other shoe to drop because there are literally, literally thousands of other cases like this that will now proceed forward with this as it's not a precedent. The technical term I guess is bellwether, but they will certainly be brought up in future cases. Now, Kathy Gallus argued against the decision last week saying, and I agree, saying it's a threat. But Patrick, you said you didn't like that idea.
