Loading summary
A
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Ross Law from Morgan Stanley's European Aerospace and Defence Team.
B
And I'm Arushi Aggarwal from the European Sustainability Research Team.
A
Today, a topic that's rapidly defining the boundaries of sustainable investing and technological leadership, the use of AI in defence. It's Tuesday, July 8th at 3pm in London. At the recent NATO summit, member countries decided to boost their core defence spending target from 2% to 3.5% of GDP. This big jump is sure to spark a wave of innovation in defense, particularly in AI and military technology. It's clear that Europe is focusing on rearmament, with AI playing a major role. In fact, AI is revolutionizing everything from unmanned systems and cyber defense to simulation training and precision targeting. It's changing the game for how nations prepare for and engage in conflict. And with all these changes come serious challenges. Investors, policymakers and technologists are facing some tough questions that sit at the intersection of two of Morgan Stanley's four key themes, the multipolar world and tech diffusion. So, Arushi to set the stage, how is the concept of sustainability evolving to include national security and defence, particularly in Europe?
B
You know Ross, it's fascinating to see how much this space has evolved over the past year. Geopolitical tensions have really pushed national security much higher on the sustainability agenda. We're seeing a structural shift in sentiment towards defence investments. While historically defence companies were largely excluded by sustainability funds, we're now seeing asset managers revisiting these exclusions, especially around conventional and nuclear weapons. Some are even launching thematic funds specifically focused on security and resilience. However, in the absence of standard methodologies to assess weapon related exposures, evaluate sector specific ESG risks and determine transparency, there is no clear consensus on what sustainability focused managers can hold. Greater policy focus has created the need to identify a long term approach to investing in this sector, one that is cognizant of ethical issues. Investors are now increasingly asking whether rapid technological integration might allow for a more forward looking, risk aware approach to investing in national security.
A
So it's no news that Europe has historically underspent on defence. Now the spending goal is moving to 3.5% of GDP to try and catch up. Our estimates suggest this could mean an additional $200 billion per year in additional spend with a focus on equipment over personnel, at least for the time being. With this new focus, how is AI shaping the European rearmament strategy?
B
Well, AI appears to be at the core of EU's 800 billion euro rearmament plan. The Commission has been quite clear that escalating tensions have not only led to a new arms race, but also provoked a global technological race. Now to think about it, AI, quantum, biotech, robotics and hypersonic are key inputs not only for long term economic growth, but also for military preeminence. In our base case, we estimate that total NATO military spend into AI applications will potentially more than double to $112 billion by 2030. This is at a 4% AI investment allocation rate. If this allocation rate increases to 10% as anticipated by European deep tech firms, then NATO's AI military spend could grow sixfold to $306 billion by 2030 in our bull case. So Ross, you were at the Paris Air show recently where companies demonstrated their latest product capabilities, which AI applications are leading the way in defense right now?
A
Yeah, it was really quite eye opening. We've identified nine key AI applications reshaping defence. And our application readiness radar shows that cybersecurity followed by unmanned systems exhibit the highest level of preparedness from a public and private investment perspective. Cybersecurity is a major priority due to increased proliferation of cyber attacks and disinformation campaigns. And this technology can be used for both defensive and offensive measures. Unmanned systems are also really taking off, no pun intended, mainly driven by the rise in drone warfare that's reshaping the battlefield In Ukraine. At the Paris Air show, we saw demonstrations of wingmen, crewed and uncrewed aircraft. There have also been several public and private partnerships in this area with within our coverage. Another area gaining traction is simulation and war gaming. As defence spending increases and potentially leads to more military personnel, we see this theme in high demand in the coming years.
B
And how are European aerospace and defence companies positioning themselves in terms of AI readiness?
A
Well, they're really making significant advancements. We've assessed AI technology readiness for our A and D companies across six different verticals. The number of applications, dual use capabilities, AI pricing power, responsible AI policy and partnerships on both external and internal product categories. What's really interesting is that European A and D companies have higher pricing power relative to their US counterparts. And a higher percentage are both enablers and adopters of AI. To accelerate AI integration. These companies are increasingly partnering with government research arms, leading software firms as well as peers and private players.
B
And some of these same technologies can also be used for civilian purposes. Could you share some examples with us?
A
The dual use potential is really significant. Various companies in our coverage are using their AI capabilities for civilian applications across multiple domains. For example, geospatial capabilities can also be used for wildfire management and tracking. Deforestation machine learning can be used for maritime shipping and port surveillance. But switching gears slightly if we talk about the regulatory developments that are emerging in Europe to address defence modernisation, what does this mean? Arushi for society, the industry and investors.
B
There'S quite a lot happening on the regulatory front. The European Commission is working on a defence omnibus simplification proposal aimed at speeding up defence investments in the eu. It's planning to publish a guidance notice on how defence investment will fit within the sustainable finance framework. It's also making changes to its Sustainability Reporting Directive. If warranted, the Commission will make additional adjustments to reflect the needs of the defence industry in its sustainability reporting obligations. The sustainable fund reform is another important development. While the Sustainability Fund regulation doesn't prohibit investment into the defence sector, the the Commission is seeking to provide clarification on how defence investment goals sit within a sustainability framework. Additionally, at the European Security Summit in June, the European Defence Commissioner indicated that a roadmap focusing on the modernization of European defence will be published in Autumn. This will have a special focus on AI and quantum technologies for investors. Whilst exclusions easing has started to take place, pickup in individual positioning has been slow as investors ramp up on the sector. We believe these regulatory developments can serve as catalysts providing clear demand and trend signals for the sector.
A
So finally, in this context, how can companies and investors navigate these ethical considerations responsibly?
B
So in the Note we highlight that AI risk management requires the ability to tackle two types of challenges. First, technical challenges which can be mitigated by embedding boundaries and success criteria directly into the design of the AI model, for example training AI systems to refuse harmful requests. Second, challenges are more open ended and ambiguous set of challenges that relate to coordinating non proliferation among countries and preventing misuse by bad actors. This set of challenges requires continuous interstate dialogue and cooperation rather than purely technical fixes. From an investor perspective, closer corporate engagement will be key to navigating these debates, ensuring firms have clear documentation of their algorithms and decision making processes. Human in the loop systems transparency around data sets used to train the AI models are some of the engagement points we mention in our Note. Ultimately I think the key is balance. On the one hand we have to recognize the legitimate security needs that defence technologies address and on the other hand there's the need to ensure appropriate safeguards and oversight.
A
Arushi, thanks for taking the time to talk.
B
It was great speaking with you Ross.
A
And thank you all for listening. If you enjoy thoughts on the market, please leave us a review Wherever you listen and share the podcast with a friend or colleague today.
C
The preceding content is informational only and based on information available when created. It is not an offer or solicitation, nor is it tax or legal advice. It does not consider your financial circumstances and objectives and may not be suitable for you.
Podcast Summary: "How AI Is Disrupting Defense"
Podcast Information:
Introduction
In the July 8, 2025 episode of Thoughts on the Market, Ross Law from Morgan Stanley's European Aerospace and Defence Team and Arushi Aggarwal from the European Sustainability Research Team delve into the transformative role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the defense sector. The discussion is set against the backdrop of Europe's recent decision to increase defense spending, highlighting the intersection of sustainable investing, technological innovation, and national security.
Rising Defense Spending and AI Integration
Ross Law opens the conversation by addressing the significant policy shift at the recent NATO summit, where member countries agreed to elevate their defense spending from 2% to 3.5% of GDP. This increase is projected to inject an additional $200 billion annually, primarily directed towards equipment rather than personnel.
Ross Law (00:11): “At the recent NATO summit, member countries decided to boost their core defence spending target from 2% to 3.5% of GDP. This big jump is sure to spark a wave of innovation in defense, particularly in AI and military technology.”
Arushi Aggarwal elaborates on Europe's strategic emphasis on rearmament, emphasizing AI's pivotal role in revolutionizing defense mechanisms—from unmanned systems and cyber defense to simulation training and precision targeting.
Evolution of Sustainability in Defense
Arushi Aggarwal discusses the evolving concept of sustainability to encompass national security and defense, particularly in the European context. Historically, defense companies were often excluded from sustainability funds due to ethical concerns surrounding conventional and nuclear weapons. However, geopolitical tensions have shifted perspectives, prompting asset managers to reconsider these exclusions.
Arushi Aggarwal (01:21): “Geopolitical tensions have really pushed national security much higher on the sustainability agenda. We're seeing a structural shift in sentiment towards defence investments.”
She notes the emergence of thematic funds focused on security and resilience, despite the lack of standardized methodologies for assessing weapon-related exposures and sector-specific ESG risks. Investors are now questioning whether rapid technological integration can facilitate a more forward-looking and risk-aware approach to investing in national security.
AI's Role in European Rearmament Strategy
Ross highlights AI's centrality in the EU's €800 billion rearmament plan. The integration of advanced technologies like AI, quantum computing, biotech, robotics, and hypersonics is deemed essential not only for long-term economic growth but also for maintaining military superiority.
Ross Law (02:31): “Our estimates suggest this could mean an additional $200 billion per year in additional spend with a focus on equipment over personnel, at least for the time being.”
He references the Paris Air Show, where nine key AI applications reshaping defense were identified, with cybersecurity and unmanned systems leading in preparedness and investment.
Ross Law (04:01): “We've identified nine key AI applications reshaping defence. And our application readiness radar shows that cybersecurity followed by unmanned systems exhibit the highest level of preparedness from a public and private investment perspective.”
Arushi adds that the EU's plan anticipates NATO's military spending on AI could potentially double to $112 billion by 2030, with a bullish scenario projecting a sixfold increase to $306 billion.
Arushi Aggarwal (02:55): “In our base case, we estimate that total NATO military spend into AI applications will potentially more than double to $112 billion by 2030. This is at a 4% AI investment allocation rate.”
AI Applications Leading Defense Innovations
During the Paris Air Show, significant advancements in AI-driven defense technologies were showcased. Cybersecurity remains a top priority due to the rise in cyber attacks and disinformation campaigns, with AI being utilized for both defensive and offensive measures. Unmanned systems, particularly drones, are transforming battlefields, as evidenced by their prominent role in conflicts like Ukraine.
Ross identifies other burgeoning areas such as simulation and war gaming, which are expected to grow in demand alongside increased defense spending.
Ross Law (04:59): “Cybersecurity is a major priority due to increased proliferation of cyber attacks and disinformation campaigns. Unmanned systems are also really taking off, mainly driven by the rise in drone warfare that's reshaping the battlefield.”
European Defense Companies and AI Readiness
European aerospace and defense companies are making significant strides in AI readiness. They exhibit higher pricing power compared to their U.S. counterparts and demonstrate robust capabilities as both enablers and adopters of AI. These companies are forging partnerships with government research institutions, leading software firms, and private sector players to accelerate AI integration.
Ross Law (05:05): “European A and D companies have higher pricing power relative to their US counterparts. And a higher percentage are both enablers and adopters of AI.”
Additionally, the dual-use nature of AI technologies allows for civilian applications, such as geospatial capabilities for wildfire management and maritime surveillance, broadening the impact and utility of defense-oriented AI innovations.
Ross Law (05:51): “Various companies in our coverage are using their AI capabilities for civilian applications across multiple domains.”
Regulatory Developments in Europe
Arushi Aggarwal outlines the European Commission's efforts to streamline defense investments through regulatory reforms. Key initiatives include:
At the European Security Summit, a roadmap focusing on modernizing European defense with an emphasis on AI and quantum technologies was announced, set to be published in Autumn.
Arushi Aggarwal (06:22): “The European Commission is working on a defence omnibus simplification proposal aimed at speeding up defence investments in the EU.”
These regulatory changes are expected to act as catalysts, providing clear demand signals and trend directions for the defense sector, although individual investor positioning remains gradual.
Navigating Ethical Considerations in AI-Driven Defense
The discussion concludes with addressing the ethical challenges of integrating AI into defense. Arushi Aggarwal emphasizes a dual approach to AI risk management:
Arushi Aggarwal (07:51): “AI risk management requires the ability to tackle two types of challenges... The key is balance. On the one hand we have to recognize the legitimate security needs that defence technologies address and on the other hand there's the need to ensure appropriate safeguards and oversight.”
From an investor standpoint, closer corporate engagement is crucial. This involves ensuring transparency in algorithms, decision-making processes, and data sets used to train AI models.
Conclusion
The episode underscores the transformative impact of AI on the defense sector, particularly within Europe’s strategic rearmament efforts. As defense spending ramps up, AI's role becomes increasingly pivotal, driving innovation while also raising critical ethical and regulatory considerations. Investors, policymakers, and technologists must navigate this evolving landscape with a balanced approach, ensuring that technological advancements contribute to national security without compromising ethical standards.
Notable Quotes:
Ross Law (00:11): “At the recent NATO summit, member countries decided to boost their core defence spending target from 2% to 3.5% of GDP. This big jump is sure to spark a wave of innovation in defense, particularly in AI and military technology.”
Arushi Aggarwal (01:21): “Geopolitical tensions have really pushed national security much higher on the sustainability agenda. We're seeing a structural shift in sentiment towards defence investments.”
Ross Law (04:01): “We've identified nine key AI applications reshaping defence. And our application readiness radar shows that cybersecurity followed by unmanned systems exhibit the highest level of preparedness from a public and private investment perspective.”
Arushi Aggarwal (07:51): “AI risk management requires the ability to tackle two types of challenges... The key is balance. On the one hand we have to recognize the legitimate security needs that defence technologies address and on the other hand there's the need to ensure appropriate safeguards and oversight.”
This comprehensive summary encapsulates the key discussions from the episode, providing insightful perspectives on AI's disruptive role in defense, the evolving landscape of sustainable investing, regulatory developments, and the ethical considerations that stakeholders must navigate.