Loading summary
A
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Serena Tang, Morgan Stanley's chief Global cross Asset Strategist.
B
And I'm Seth Carpenter, Morgan Stanley's global Chief Economist.
A
Today we'll discuss Morgan Stanley's mid year outlook for the global economy and markets. It's Wednesday, May 21st at 10am in New York. Zef, you published your Year Ahead outlook last November. Since President Trump took office back in January, there's been pretty significant policy and economic uncertainty and quite a few surprises. With this in mind, what is your current outlook for the global economy for the second half of this year and into 2026?
B
So we titled the outlook skewed to the Downside because we really do think the US Economy, the global economy is set to slow meaningfully from where we were coming into this year. Let's start with the U.S. as you said, policy changes came in a lot this year since the new administration took over. I would say the two key ones from a macro perspective so far have been trade policy and immigration policy. Tariffs have gone up, tariffs have gone down, tariffs have been suspended. Right now what we think is going to ultimately take place is that we will see persistent notable tariffs on China, lower tariffs on the rest of the world, and then we'll have to see how things evolve. What does that mean? Well, it means for the US Higher inflation and lower growth. In addition, immigration reform means that growth is going to slow because the growth rate of the labor force is going to slow. Now, around the rest of the world, the tariff shock matters as well. When the US Puts in tariffs on its imports from other countries, that's negative demand for those other countries. So we're looking for pretty weak growth in the euro area. Now I will note lots of people were excited about possible expansionary fiscal policy in Germany and we think that's still there. We just don't think it's enough to give the euro area robust growth in Asia. China is a main driver of the economy. China is a big recipient of these tariffs. We think the deflation cycle that we expected in China keeps going on. This reduction in demand from the US Is not going to help, but they'll probably be a little bit at the margin offsetting fiscal policy. So what does that mean? Put together lackluster growth in China, call it 4% slow growth for yet another year. Overall, the global economy should step down. Will it be a recession? That's one of the key questions that we hear from clients, but we don't think so. Not quite just a meaningful step down.
A
Interesting. So any particular Regions that seem to be bright spots or surprises or perhaps have seen the biggest shift in your outlook.
B
I guess I'd flag two potential bright spots around the world. The first is India. India has been for us a favorite. It will have the highest growth rate of any economy that we have in our coverage area. And because it's such a big economy, that's part of why the global economy can't lose that much steam. India has lots going for it. There are cyclical factors boosting growth in the near term, but there are also longer term structural policy driven reasons to think that Indian growth will stay solid for the foreseeable future. I guess I'd also throw in Japan. Now, its growth rate isn't going to be anywhere near the kind of growth in number terms that we're going to see from India. But this has to be taken in the context of 25 years of essentially zero growth of nominal GDP. The reflationary cycle that we think started a couple years ago remains intact even with the tariff shock. And so we're pretty optimistic still that Japanese reflation will continue.
A
And to what extent are US Tariffs contributing to global inflationary pressures? And how do you expect the Fed and other central banks to respond?
B
Tariffs are imposed by the United States on most of the imports coming into the country, whereas other countries, maybe they have some retaliatory tariffs just against the U.S. but definitely not as broad as the U.S. that means for the U.S. tariffs are going to drive up inflation domestically and drive down growth, whereas for the rest of the world, it's mostly just a negative demand shock. So they will be disinflationary for the rest of the world and pushing down growth. What does that mean for central banks? Well, outside of the U.S. central banks are going to see this as slowing aggregate demand. And so it's pretty clear what it is that they want to do. If they were hiking, they can stop hiking. If they were going to hold steady, they can lower rates a little bit. And if they were already lowering interest rates like the European Central bank, well, they can probably keep going with that without having to worry. And that's why we think the ECB is going to lower its policy rate to probably one and a half percent and maybe even lower, which is below where the market is expecting things. Now for the Fed, things are much more tricky. The Fed cares about inflation, the Fed cares about US Growth. And both of those variables are going in the opposite direction of what they want over the rest of this forecast. Right now, inflation's too high for the Fed and History shows that inflation goes up first with tariffs before the growth rate hits. So the Fed's probably going to wait until the hard data show a bigger slowdown in the economy, a worsening in the labor market that is a bigger concern for them than the already too high inflation that is set to rise further over the rest of the year.
A
And in your view, how does trade policy uncertainty influence business investment, particularly in export oriented industries or in economies tightly linked to US Demand?
B
Yeah, I think it has to be negative. And therein lies one of the biggest challenges is just how negative and I can't say for sure. But what we do know is that uncertainty tends to be very negative for business investment spending decisions. If you're trying to make a decision as a business, should I build a new factory? This is something that's going to have a long life to it and you're going to get benefits hopefully for several years. How big are those benefits relative to the cost? Well, right now it's not at all clear and so there's an option value to waiting. And we think that uncertainty is depressing investment decisions right now. I think it has to affect export oriented industries. There are a lot of questions about what sort of retaliatory tariffs other countries might impose. But it also affects domestic driven businesses because, well, they're going to have to see what their demand is. And some of the ones that are just focused on the US Economy are selling imported goods. So it affects businesses across the board.
A
Right. And how do US Tariff hikes spill over into emerging markets and how might these countries buffer against these shocks?
B
Yeah, I think there's a range of outcomes and the range is as wide as there are different countries. If you stay close to home, take Mexico. Mexico is a big trading partner with the US and early on in this whole tariff discussion they were actually the targets of lots of tariff threats that could have hurt them directly because there'd be less demand for their exports to the United States. Now we've got some resolution. We have the trade agreement with Canada and Mexico. Most of Mexico's exports to the US are exempt under those conditions. However, the indirect effect is important as well. Mexico is very attached to the US economy and so as the US Economy slows because of these tariffs, the Mexican economy will slow as well. But there's also an indirect effect through currency markets. And I think this is a channel that's more broadly applicable across em. If the Fed is going to be on hold, like we think holding interest rates higher for longer than the market might currently think, that means that em central banks who might want to lower their policy rate to support their economy are going to be caught in a bit of a bind. They can't afford to take the risk that their currency will misbehave if they ease too much too far ahead of the Fed. I think there is a little bit of a constraint for em central banks thinking about how much can I attend to domestic matters and how much do I have to pay attention to external matters?
A
Now, I know forecasting economic growth is difficult in even the best of times, and this has been a period of exceptional volatility. How are you and your economic colleagues factoring all of this uncertainty?
B
It's a great question. And luminary minds like Niels Bohr, the Nobel laureate in physics, and Yogi Berra, everyone's favorite prophet, have both said forecasting is hard, especially about the future. And this time, as you note, is even more so. So what can we do? We try to come up with as many different scenarios as we can. We ask ourselves not just what's the most likely outcome because there's uncertainty, the policy changes could come fast and furious. We also try to ask ourselves, if tariffs were to go back up from where they are now, how would that outcome turn out? If tariffs were to go away entirely, how would that turn out? You have to start thinking more and more, I think, in terms of scenarios.
A
And does this, in your view, change how much or how little investors should focus on the macroeconomy?
B
Well, I think it means that investors have to focus every bit as much on the macroeconomy as they have in the past. I think it's undeniable that if we're right and the US Economy slows down materially and the global economy slows down with it, longer term interest rates are probably going to come down along the lines of what our colleagues in interest rate strategy think. That makes a lot of sense to me. I think the trickier part though is knowing where the macroeconomy is going. We've got our forecast, but we are ready to make a revision if the facts change. And I think that's the trickier part. For investors, the macro economy still matters, but having a lot of conviction about where it's going and as a result, what it means for asset prices. Well, well, that's the trickier part. Serena, you've been asking me lots of questions and they've been great questions, but I'm going to turn the table. I'm going to start asking questions right back to you, but we probably have to save that for another episode, so let's pause it there.
A
That sounds great, Seth.
B
And to the people listening, I want to say thanks for listening and if you enjoy thoughts on the market, please leave us a review wherever you listen and share the podcast with a friend or a colleague today.
A
The preceding content is informational only and based on information available when created. It is not an offer or solicitation, nor is it tax or legal advice. It does not consider your financial circumstances and objectives and may not be suitable for you.
Midyear Global Outlook, Pt 1: Skewing to the Downside Hosted by Morgan Stanley | Released May 21, 2025
In this episode of "Thoughts on the Market," Serena Tang, Morgan Stanley's Chief Global Cross Asset Strategist, and Seth Carpenter, Morgan Stanley's Global Chief Economist, delve into the firm's midyear outlook for the global economy and markets. Titled "Skewing to the Downside," the discussion provides an in-depth analysis of current economic trends, policy impacts, regional performances, and investment implications amid ongoing uncertainties.
Seth Carpenter sets the tone by explaining the rationale behind the "Skewing to the Downside" outlook, emphasizing expectations of a meaningful slowdown in both the U.S. and global economies compared to earlier projections.
“We really do think the US Economy, the global economy is set to slow meaningfully from where we were coming into this year.”
— Seth Carpenter [00:40]
While Carpenter stops short of predicting a recession, he highlights a significant deceleration in economic growth, influenced by various policy changes and external shocks.
The discussion highlights two major policy areas shaping the U.S. economic landscape: trade and immigration.
Trade Policy: Since the new administration took office, there has been considerable fluctuation in tariffs. Carpenter notes a likely scenario of persistent tariffs on China, reduced tariffs on other nations, and ongoing uncertainty about future policies.
“What does that mean? Well, it means for the US Higher inflation and lower growth.”
— Seth Carpenter [00:40]
Immigration Policy: Reform in immigration is anticipated to slow the growth rate of the U.S. labor force, contributing to overall economic deceleration.
These policy shifts are expected to result in higher inflation coupled with reduced economic growth in the U.S.
Carpenter extends the analysis to the global stage, explaining how U.S. tariffs negatively impact other economies by reducing demand for their exports.
“When the US Puts in tariffs on its imports from other countries, that's negative demand for those other countries.”
— Seth Carpenter [01:20]
He forecasts weak growth in the euro area, attributing it to subdued demand despite potential expansionary fiscal policies in countries like Germany. Additionally, China's economy is projected to continue its slow growth cycle, exacerbated by reduced U.S. demand.
Despite the overall downward trend, Carpenter identifies two regions as potential bright spots:
India: Anticipated to exhibit the highest growth rate among covered economies, bolstered by both cyclical factors and long-term structural policies.
“India has lots going for it. There are cyclical factors boosting growth in the near term, but there are also longer term structural policy driven reasons to think that Indian growth will stay solid for the foreseeable future.”
— Seth Carpenter [02:38]
Japan: While not growing as rapidly as India, Japan's reflationary cycle remains robust, suggesting continued economic momentum despite broader global challenges.
“We're pretty optimistic still that Japanese reflation will continue.”
— Seth Carpenter [02:38]
The imposition of tariffs by the U.S. is a double-edged sword, fueling domestic inflation while acting as a demand dampener internationally.
“Tariffs are going to drive up inflation domestically and drive down growth, whereas for the rest of the world, it's mostly just a negative demand shock.”
— Seth Carpenter [03:45]
Central Bank Responses:
U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed): Faces a dilemma as it contends with rising inflation and slowing growth. Carpenter suggests the Fed may "wait until the hard data show a bigger slowdown in the economy" before adjusting policies.
“The Fed's probably going to wait until the hard data show a bigger slowdown in the economy...”
— Seth Carpenter [04:45]
European Central Bank (ECB): Likely to lower policy rates further to counteract slowing demand.
“We think the ECB is going to lower its policy rate to probably one and a half percent and maybe even lower...”
— Seth Carpenter [04:45]
Emerging market central banks face constraints in managing domestic economic needs while avoiding adverse currency movements in light of the Fed's potential tightening.
Trade policy uncertainty significantly hampers business investment, particularly in export-oriented industries and economies closely tied to U.S. demand.
“Uncertainty tends to be very negative for business investment spending decisions.”
— Seth Carpenter [05:30]
Businesses are hesitant to commit to long-term investments like building new factories amid unpredictable tariff landscapes, leading to broader economic caution.
Emerging markets (EM) are affected both directly and indirectly by U.S. tariff policies:
Direct Impact: Countries like Mexico, despite trade agreements mitigating some tariff effects, still face economic slowdowns due to reduced U.S. demand.
“Mexico is very attached to the US economy and so as the US Economy slows because of these tariffs, the Mexican economy will slow as well.”
— Seth Carpenter [06:32]
Indirect Impact: EM central banks are constrained in lowering interest rates to support domestic economies without risking currency instability, especially if the Fed maintains higher rates longer than expected.
“EM central banks who might want to lower their policy rate... have to pay attention to external matters.”
— Seth Carpenter [06:32]
Acknowledging the heightened difficulty in economic forecasting amidst exceptional volatility, Carpenter emphasizes the importance of scenario planning.
“You have to start thinking more and more... in terms of scenarios.”
— Seth Carpenter [08:01]
Morgan Stanley employs a range of scenarios to anticipate potential policy shifts and their implications, recognizing that flexibility is crucial in adapting forecasts as new data emerges.
Carpenter advises investors to maintain a strong focus on the macroeconomic environment, underscoring its significant influence on asset prices. However, he cautions against overconfidence in specific economic projections due to inherent uncertainties.
“For investors, the macro economy still matters, but having a lot of conviction about where it's going... is the trickier part.”
— Seth Carpenter [08:49]
Staying adaptable and ready to revise investment strategies in response to changing economic indicators is essential for navigating the current market landscape.
The episode concludes with Serena Tang and Seth Carpenter acknowledging the complexities of the current economic environment. While there are identifiable growth areas like India and Japan, overarching challenges such as U.S. trade policies, global demand shocks, and central bank constraints paint a cautious picture for the remainder of the year and into 2026.
“We've got our forecast, but we are ready to make a revision if the facts change.”
— Seth Carpenter [08:49]
Listeners are encouraged to stay informed and adaptable, recognizing that the interplay of various economic factors will continue to shape market dynamics in the near future.
For more insights and detailed analyses on market trends, tune into future episodes of "Thoughts on the Market" by Morgan Stanley.