Transcript
A (0:00)
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Serena Tang, Morgan Stanley's Chief Cross Asset strategist.
B (0:06)
And I'm Viseetrupator, Morgan Stanley's chief Fixed Income Strategist.
A (0:10)
Today's topic pushback to our outlook. It's Friday, June 6th at 10:00am in New York. Morgan Stanley Research published our mid year outlook about two weeks ago, a collaborative effort across the department bringing together our economist views with our strategist high conviction ideas. Right now we're recommending investors to be overweight in U.S. equities, overweight in core fixed income like U.S. treasuries, like U.S. iG corporate credit. But some of our views are out of consensus. So I want to talk to you Vishy, about pushback that you've been getting and how we push back on the pushback.
B (0:55)
Right. So the biggest pushback I've gotten is a bit of a dissonance between our economics narrative and our markets narrative. Our economics narrative, as you know, calls for a significant weakening of economic growth from about for the US 2.5% growth in 2024 goes into 1% in 2025 and in 2026 and Fed doesn't cut rates in 2025 and cut seven times in 2026. And if you look at a somewhat uninspiring outlook for the US Economy from our economists reconciling an uninspiring economic outlook on the US Economy with the constructive view we have on US Assets, equities, credit, Treasuries, that's been a source of contention. So reconciling an uninspiring outlook on the US Economy with a constructive view on risk assets as well as risk free assets in the US Economy. So equities credit as well as government bonds has been a somewhat contentious issue. So how do we reconcile this? So my pushback to the pushback is the following that they are different plot lines across different asset classes. So our economists have slowing of the economy but not an outright recession. Our economists don't have rate cuts in 2025 but but have seven rate cuts in 2026. So if you look at the total number of rate cuts that are being priced in by the markets today, roughly about two rate cuts in 25 and about between two and three rate cuts in 2026. We expect greater policy easing than what's currently priced in the markets. So that makes sense for our constructive view on interest rates and in government bonds and duration. That makes sense from a credit point of view. We enter this point with a much better credit fundamentals in Leverage and coverage terms, we have the emergence of a total yield based buyer base which we think will be largely intact at our expectations. And you layer on top of that the idea that growth slows but doesn't fall into recession is also constructive for higher quality credit. So that explains our credit view from an equities view, the drawdowns that we experienced in April, our equity strategist thing, marks the worst outcomes from a policy point of view that we could have had. That has already happened. So looking forward, they look for EPS growth over the course of next 12 months, they look for benefits of deregulation to kick in. So along with that seven rate cuts get them to be comfortable in being constructive about their views on equities. So all of that ties together and.
