Transcript
A (0:00)
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Michael Zezas, Deputy Global Head of Research for Morgan Stanley.
B (0:05)
And I'm Mariana Salvatore, Head of Public Policy Research.
A (0:08)
Today we're discussing the U. S. Iran ceasefire's key uncertainties, consequences and what we're watching for Next. It's Wednesday, April 8th at 11:00am in New York. Okay, let's start with the current situation. The US and Iran have agreed to a provisional ceasefire. Two weeks tied to follow on talks and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Markets so far are treating this as a de escalation, but not a clear resolution.
B (0:40)
That's right. And I think the key framing here is this is a pause, not a peace deal. And in the near term I would not assume things are suddenly stable. We still have some key uncertainties around how the ceasefire deal is going to be implemented and as well as how negotiations will begin to take shape.
A (0:56)
Right, and that's important. It seems like Iran's reported 10 point plan for the ceasefire includes some elements that might be non starters for the us. Some things around sanctions and unfreezing of assets. And so there's lots of ways that there could be some re escalation in the near term.
B (1:18)
Okay, so that's the near term. Fragile, noisy and still pretty headline driven. But let's try to think about this a little bit further out. How are we thinking about the medium term?
A (1:28)
Yeah, so thinking a little bit further out, it seems to us that ceasefire and Strait of Hormuz reopening should continue to progress because the incentives are widely shared across the key actors involved. So the US's incentive to effectively be done with the conflict is pretty well understood. There's domestic political incentives and economic incentives. There's ways to potentially explain away some of the compromises the US might have to make around the Strait of Hormuz, around sanctions, and maybe point to some incentives to work with partners in the region over time to diminish the importance of the Strait of Hormuz as a choke point. Iran's incentive is pretty clear to preserve its regiment. And another actor here which appears to be increasingly important is China, which has reportedly been involved in expressing its preference for de escalation. And that's pretty important because China has a lot of leverage on Iran given its economic relationship with the country.
B (2:35)
So starting with these negotiations, it seems like as you mentioned before, there's still a lot of gaps between what the US side and what the Iranian side is asking for. But let's put that in the context of the ceasefire Even if it were to hold, that doesn't necessarily translate to stability, right?
