Loading summary
A
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Andrew Sheetz, head of corporate credit research at Morgan Stanley. Today I'll be discussing realistic scenarios where things are worse than we expect. Next week, I'll cover what could be better. It's Wednesday, December 11, at 2pm in London. Morgan Stanley strategists and economists recently completed our forecasting process for the year ahead, and regular listeners will have now heard our expectations across a wide range of economies and markets. But I'd stress that these forecasts are a central case. The world is uncertain, with a probability distribution around all forecasts. So in the case of credit, what could go wrong? As a quick reminder, our baseline for credit is reasonably constructive. We think that low credit spreads can remain low, especially in the first half of next year, as policy changes slow to come through, economic data holds up. The Fed and the European Central bank ease rates more than expected, and still high yields on corporate bonds attract buyers. So how does all of that go wrong? Well, there are a few specific realistic factors that could lead us to something worse. That is our bear case. Let me start with US Policy. Morgan Stanley's Public Policies team's view is that the incoming US Administration will see fast announcement but slow implementation on key issues like tariffs, fiscal policy, and immigration, and that that slower implementation of any of these policies will mean that change comes less quickly to the economy. But that change could happen faster, which would mean weaker growth and higher prices if, for example, tariffs were to hit earlier or in larger size. In the case of immigration, we're actually still forecasting positive net immigration over the next several years. But a larger change in policy would raise the odds of a more severe labor shortage, even outside any specific change from the new US Administration. There's also a risk that the US Economy simply runs out of gas. The recovery since COVID has been extraordinary, one of the fastest on record, especially in the labor market. The risk is that companies have now done all the hiring they need to do, meaning a slower job market going forward. Even in their base case, Morgan Stanley's economists see job market growth slowing, adding just 28,000 jobs a month in 2026. And to give you a sense of how low that number is, the average over the last 12 months was 190,000. And so the bear case is that the labor market slows even more, more quickly, raising the risk of recession and dramatically lowering bond yields, both of which would reduce investor demand for corporate bonds. At the other extreme, credit could be challenged if conditions are too hot because current levels of corporate aggression are still quite low. We think they could rise in 2025 without creating a major problem. But if those corporate animal spirits arrive more rapidly, it could could be a negative. Outside the US we think the growth in Europe holds up as the European Central bank cuts rates and Europeans end up saving at a slightly less elevated rate and that that can keep growth near this year's levels around 1%. But you don't need me to tell you that Europe is riddled with challenges, from the political in France to major structural questions around Germany's economy. Meanwhile, China, the world's second largest economy, continues to struggle with too little inflation. We think that growth in China muddles through, but a larger trade escalation could drive downside risk One reason why we prefer ex China credit within Asia, of course, maybe the most obvious risk to credit is simply valuation. Credit spreads in the US are near 20 year lows, while the US price to earnings multiple for the equity market is near 20 year highs. In our view, valuation is a much better guide to returns over the next six years rather than say, the next six months. And that's one reason we're currently looking through this. But those valuations do leave a lot less margin for error. Thanks for listening. If you enjoy the show, leave us a review wherever you listen and share thoughts on the market with a friend or colleague today.
B
The preceding content is informational only and based on information available when created. It is not an offer or solicitation, nor is it tax or legal advice. It does not consider your financial circumstances and objectives and may not be suitable for.
Thoughts on the Market: What Could Go Wrong for Corporate Credit?
Podcast Information:
Summary:
In the December 11, 2024 episode of Thoughts on the Market, Morgan Stanley’s Head of Corporate Credit Research, Andrew Sheetz, delves into the bear case scenarios that could adversely impact corporate credit markets. Sheetz systematically explores various risk factors ranging from US policy shifts to global economic uncertainties, providing a comprehensive analysis for investors and market enthusiasts alike.
Andrew Sheetz opens the episode by outlining the current optimistic baseline for corporate credit. He emphasizes that “low credit spreads can remain low, especially in the first half of next year,” citing factors such as delayed policy changes, stable economic data, accommodative monetary policies from the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, and sustained investor interest in high-yield corporate bonds ([00:02]).
Sheetz transitions to potential risks stemming from US policy developments. He notes that “the incoming US Administration will see fast announcement but slow implementation on key issues like tariffs, fiscal policy, and immigration” ([00:30]). This slow implementation could delay economic changes, potentially leading to:
Accelerated Policy Changes: Contrary to slow implementation, any rapid policy shifts—such as “tariffs hitting earlier or in larger size”—could trigger weaker economic growth and heightened inflation ([00:35]).
Immigration Policy: While current forecasts anticipate “positive net immigration over the next several years,” a more stringent immigration policy could exacerbate labor shortages, compounding economic challenges ([00:40]).
A significant portion of the discussion centers on the robustness of the US labor market. Sheetz highlights the unprecedented recovery since COVID-19 but warns of potential stagnation:
Job Market Saturation: He points out that “companies have now done all the hiring they need to do,” leading to a projected slowdown in job growth ([01:00]).
Base Case vs. Bear Case: In the baseline scenario, job growth is expected to decelerate modestly to 28,000 jobs per month in 2026—a stark drop from the recent average of 190,000 jobs per month ([01:05]). The bear case posits an even more severe slowdown, increasing the risk of a recession and reducing demand for corporate bonds due to lower bond yields ([01:10]).
Sheetz introduces another risk factor related to corporate behavior:
Turning to the international landscape, Sheetz outlines potential global risks:
Europe: Although the European economy is expected to maintain “growth near this year’s levels around 1%” due to rate cuts by the European Central Bank and modestly reduced savings rates, numerous challenges persist. Issues such as “political instability in France” and “structural questions around Germany's economy” could undermine growth prospects ([01:35]).
China: As the world’s second-largest economy, China faces its own set of challenges. Sheetz observes that while “growth in China muddles through,” the risk of a “larger trade escalation” could pose significant downside risks to global credit markets ([01:40]).
A critical examination of market valuations reveals underlying vulnerabilities:
Credit Spreads and Equity Multiples: Sheetz warns that “credit spreads in the US are near 20-year lows,” and the US equity market’s price-to-earnings multiple is hovering near 20-year highs ([02:00]). Such high valuations “leave a lot less margin for error,” signaling potential corrections if market conditions deteriorate ([02:05]).
Long-Term vs. Short-Term Outlook: He emphasizes that valuation metrics are more indicative of “returns over the next six years rather than say, the next six months,” suggesting that while immediate risks are manageable, long-term uncertainties could have more pronounced effects ([02:10]).
In wrapping up, Sheetz reiterates the importance of recognizing these bear case scenarios to prepare for potential market downturns. He stresses that while the baseline scenario remains constructive, vigilance is essential given the multitude of risk factors that could derail corporate credit performance.
Notable Quotes:
Conclusion:
Andrew Sheetz provides a thorough analysis of the potential risks facing corporate credit markets, emphasizing that while current conditions are favorable, a range of factors—from US policy shifts and labor market dynamics to global economic uncertainties and high market valuations—could precipitate adverse outcomes. Investors are advised to consider these bear case scenarios in their strategic planning to navigate the complex and uncertain economic landscape ahead.