The Business of Migrant Detention

Summary

Throughline (NPR): "The Business of Migrant Detention"
Release Date: September 18, 2025
Hosts: Rund Abdelfatah and Ramtin Arablouei
Featured Guest: Brianna Nofil (Assistant Professor of History, William & Mary; author of The Migrants’ Jail: An American History of Mass Incarceration)

---

Overview

This episode takes a deep, historical dive into the origins and evolution of migrant detention in the United States, tracing it from 19th-century county jails along the Canadian border to today’s vast system of federal, state, local, and private facilities. The show unpacks how U.S. immigration policy has continually relied on a business model—“the commoditization of people”—driven by economic incentives for rural counties, sheriffs, and private prison companies. It’s a story about how the nation’s approach to migration is interwoven with racism, economic motives, and bipartisan politics, revealing the complexities and contradictions at the heart of America’s dealings with immigrants.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

---

1. Early Days: County Jails and the Chinese Exclusion Era (1900s)

[00:45 - 08:55; 09:00 - 17:46]

• Pulteney Bigelow’s 1903 Reporting:
  Bigelow, a reporter, exposes a rural New York jail overflowing with Chinese migrants not charged with crimes but held for immigration hearings after the Chinese Exclusion Act barred their entry.

  • “We put them in jail first and let them prove their innocence afterward.”
    — Pulteney Bigelow as recounted by Brianna Nofil [03:20]
  • Notably, Bigelow, despite his own racist views, is shocked by the administrative warehousing of migrants:
    • “I have no hesitation in pronouncing our present means of excluding Chinamen as one gigantic and complicated fraud.” — Bigelow [03:48]

• Sheriff’s Business Incentive:

  • Local sheriff Ernest Douglas personally profits by detaining migrants, as his salary increases per inmate held.
    • “Sheriffs in most of the country at this point… didn’t get an annual salary…your salary as sheriff would have depended on how many people you held in the local jail.” — Brianna Nofil [10:02]
    • “Once he finds that he can start detaining immigrants…this is a pretty spectacular new income source for the sheriff.” [10:38]
  • Douglas treats Chinese detainees as “pets” and is delighted by the extra income [11:23-11:38].

• Legal Resistance & the Growth of a Market:

  • Chinese migrants, often coached by community groups, file habeas corpus claims, usually asserting U.S. citizenship—few are actually deported.
  • Neighboring counties compete for federal detention business, building custom “Chinese jails” and offering better terms—emerging as a true market for human detention.
    • “You really see the emergence of a market.” — Nofil [14:25]

• Commodification and Tragedy:

  • Local economies benefit (food supplies, hotel stays for witnesses, jailers’ salaries).
  • Systemic cruelty: deaths in detention prompt public outrage and editorials decrying “a shame upon civilized government.”
    • “There are many deaths in this wooden detention house.” — Letter from detainees [16:40]
    • “The present Chinese exclusion law and its administration is a shame upon civilized government.” — Malone Farmer Editorial [17:02]

• Federalization and Shift to the Southern Border:

  • As the route becomes too well-known, migration shifts; Supreme Court upholds the government’s authority to deport, and the administrative model persists.

---

2. The Federal Takeover & the Cold War Era

[20:17 - 34:32]

• Ellis Island’s Transformation:

  • By the 1940s, Ellis Island is more a detention center than a processing center. Notorious cases, like Ellen Knopf’s, highlight indefinite detentions without due process.
    • “She kind of becomes this celebrity, emblematic of the excesses of detention power.” — Brianna Nofil [21:36]
  • Supreme Court backs indefinite administrative detention; activists decry civil liberty violations.

• Eisenhower’s Reform Attempt:

  • Official narrative: shift to “humane administration,” ending routine immigrant imprisonment in the East.
    • “Through humane administration, the Department of Justice is doing what it legally can to alleviate hardships. The imprisonment of aliens awaiting admission or deportation has been stopped.” — Eisenhower quoted by Nofil [23:26]
  • In reality, while Europeans are released on parole, detention on the southern border ramps up, particularly targeting Mexican migrants post-Bracero program.

• Operation Wetback:

  • Massive campaign to detain and deport Mexican migrants, justified as protecting American jobs but also driven by racism and economic anxiety.
    • “The roundup of Wetback swung into its second day today with the first day’s catch of more than 2,000 illegal immigrants termed Very Successful.” — Newsreel [26:14]

• Federal Detention Facilities Spark Local Backlash and Bidding:

  • When the federal government seeks to build a detention camp in Brownsville, Texas, counties formerly benefiting from jail contracts rebel.

    • “Counties will be, quote, left holding the bag because the immigration bureau decides it wants to increase its staff and duties and go into the prison business on a grandiose scale.” — Congressman Lloyd Benson [28:41]

  • McAllen, Texas, ultimately welcomes the center, marking the shift to large, federally-managed migrant detention camps.

• Turning Points:

  • Federal willingness to build infrastructure for deportation, with less public outcry when detentions target “faceless Mexican migrants.”
    • “They start really imagining detention as something that might deter people.” — Nofil [33:20]
  • Short-term detentions replace months-long ones; U.S. aims to make the process less visible and less legally contestable.

---

3. Rise of Mass Incarceration & Private Detention (1980s — Present)

[36:52 - 53:26]

• Oakdale & Atlanta Uprisings (1987):

  • Cubans held indefinitely after serving criminal sentences—no country to accept them leads to unrest and the largest hostage crises in U.S. prison history.
    • “Can the U.S. hold people indefinitely?” — Nofil [38:52]
    • “If you are looking for kind of a powder keg of a situation, it is kind of hard to imagine people who feel more desperate…” — Nofil [41:29]
  • Afterward, the federal government decentralizes detention again, contracting with local jails across the U.S.—especially attractive to struggling rural economies.

• Local Economic Incentives:

  • Sheriff Bill Belt in Evoyles Parish, Louisiana, becomes a model: five detention facilities emerge in a community of 40,000, employing hundreds.
    • “Folks are seeing what Bell is doing in his parish, and they are saying, huh, it doesn’t seem like demand for immigration detention space is going away. Like, maybe this is the industry of the future.” — Nofil [45:53]
  • Communities bid for contracts, seeing migrant detention as a pillar of rural survival amid declining industries.

• Privatization and Scandal:

  • Private prison companies like the Corrections Corporation of America win contracts to detain immigrants; pitch cost and speed advantages.
    • “Private prison companies… say, the jails are great, the jails are all good and fine, but we can build you new special immigrant-only facilities faster and cheaper.” — Nofil [47:19]
  • Chronic scandals (escapes, abuse, poor healthcare) drive the government back to scattering detainees among jails—a tactic to diffuse public outrage and activist attention.

• Modern System: Bipartisan Expansion & Racial Politics

  • Despite the growth of private centers, dependence on county jails never goes away—decentralization ensures a detention “footprint” in every state.
  • Immigration detention’s roots in racism and exclusion—policies consistently expand unless seen as threatening to whiteness.
    • “Immigration detention is only really ever rolled back when it is seen as threatening whiteness. And it is a system that has... gained public support by targeting racialized people.” — Nofil [50:35]
    • “This is a story about both parties coming to a consensus…that migration is criminal and that it should be punished or administered through the same infrastructure…as [the] criminal legal system.” — Nofil [53:12]

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Incentivizing Detention:
  • “Your salary as sheriff would have depended on how many people you held in the local jail.” — Brianna Nofil [10:02]
• On Legal Resistance:
  • “Almost all of them win their legal cases and leave Malone and go into the United States.” — Nofil [12:47]
• On Commodification:
  • “It is actively commoditizing people.” — Nofil [15:11]
• Local Economic Impact:
  • “One newspaper estimated that Malone would lose around $50,000 a year if, quote, Chinese business moved east. And it did.” — Rund Abdelfatah [14:42]
• On Racialized Politics:
  • “Immigration detention… is only really ever rolled back when it is seen as threatening whiteness.” — Nofil [50:35]
• Bipartisan Practice:
  • “Immigration detention is a deeply bipartisan project. This is absolutely not a story about sort of Republicans expanding it and Democrats trying to roll it back.” — Nofil [53:12]

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [00:45] — Pulteney Bigelow & the roots of administrative migrant detention
• [10:00] — Sheriffs profit directly from holding migrants
• [14:25] — The emergence of a “market” for detention contracts
• [20:17] — Ellis Island’s shift to long-term detention
• [23:26] — Eisenhower’s “humane” reform, parole vs. detention
• [25:37] — Operation Wetback and mass deportation
• [28:41] — Local backlash against federal detention centers
• [31:31] — McAllen welcomes federal detention infrastructure
• [37:07] — Oakdale & Atlanta Cuban detention uprisings
• [41:29] — Indefinite, administrative detention and its consequences
• [45:53] — Small-town Louisiana builds an economy around detention
• [47:19] — Rise of private prison companies and ongoing scandals
• [50:35] — The racial logic and durability of detention policies
• [53:12] — Both Republicans and Democrats perpetuate the detention system

---

Conclusion

This Throughline episode exposes the historical continuity and evolving forms of the U.S. migrant detention complex. From local sheriffs’ personal profit models and county jail “markets” to today’s decentralized network of private and public facilities, the system’s foundations are firmly entwined with economic opportunity, local survival, and racialized politics. Detention is revealed as less about managing migration effectively and more about political expediency, economic incentives, and—crucially—about who gets to be seen as an American.

---

For more context, tune in to the episode. The perspectives, stories, and moments of reflection—especially from historian Brianna Nofil—bring a century’s worth of history vividly to life.

Transcript

[A]

Support for NPR and the following message come from Indeed. You just realized your business needed to hire someone yesterday. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed. Claim your $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility@ Indeed.com NPR terms and conditions apply.

[B]

Are you that friend, the one who's constantly recommending podcast episodes to anyone who will Listen? Subscribe to NPR's pod club newsletter and nerd out with us. You'll get fresh podcast recommendations every week, handpicked by the people that live for this stuff. [e-mail] podclub you can also find the link in the description for this episode. Now onto the show.

[C]

In 1903, a reporter named Pulteney Bigelow stumbled across a story in upstate New.

[D]

York, the part of New York that is right along the Canadian border, a.

[C]

Rural town in Franklin county called Malone, where he starts talking with locals.

[B]

And.

[D]

They tell him this route from Canada into northern New York has become this sort of vastly under reported secret passage of illegal entry into the United States for Chinese migrants.

[C]

Like, why is that a pathway?

[E]

Is it easier to get into Canada at that time?

[D]

Yeah, it's a super intentional choice. So this is about 20 years after the US passes the Chinese Exclusion act, which bars Chinese laborers basically entirely from legal immigration to the United States. So for many Chinese migrants who are still looking for a path in, this is one of their best options.

[E]

Oh, interesting.

[D]

They take a boat to Vancouver, they take a train across the entire length of Canada. They stop over in Montreal where there are Chinese communities that coach them, that help them cross the border, and then they cross this just incredibly rural, isolated sort of path into northern New York.

[C]

That takes us back to the reporter Pulteney Bigelow, who starts asking around, and people in Malone tell him, go look at the county jail.

[D]

He arrives at the county jail, and the county jail is filled, is packed to the brim with Chinese migrants.

[F]

The sheriff took me into the jail where were about 30 Chinamen awaiting trial.

[D]

They basically stashed people in the attic of this jail, which was never intended to hold people at all.

[F]

In the yard was a massive refuse that never would have been allowed to accumulate in a decent family.

[D]

He is sort of stunned by what he sees.

[F]

There were no outdoor recreation grounds, no place for a daily walk. Two of the big window panes were broken and had been repaired by stuffing in old rags or newspapers.

[D]

It's a sort of quite brutal form of warehousing from its earliest incarnations. And Bigelow writes in his dispatch, right, he says these people are not being held because they're accused of committing a crime. These are not the people we expect to find in a local jail. Right. He says they are being held administratively by the Immigration Service because they are awaiting immigration hearings and they are awaiting potential deportations.

[F]

We put them in jail first and let them prove their innocence afterward.

[C]

And these are words coming from a guy who doesn't necessarily like Chinese people. In the same article, he makes it very clear he believes in white supremacy, but he also believed the immigration system wasn't working like it should.

[D]

So he says there is, like, something really strange happening here, something that does not resemble how we sort of imagine the US Criminal justice system operating in any way.

[F]

I have no hesitation in pronouncing our present means of excluding Chinamen as one gigantic and complicated fraud.

[D]

These people aren't accused of anything, but they are sitting in our jails for months on end.

[B]

This is Brianna Nofil.

[D]

I'm an assistant professor of history at William and Mary, and my book is called the Migrants Jail An American History of Mass Incarceration.

[B]

Brianna grew up in South Florida near a federal immigration detention center.

[D]

People would say, there's folks out there. It's down this one little road that goes into the Everglades. It's kind of like a prison, but it's kind of not.

[B]

It's called Chrome. It was an old missile base turned into a migrant detention facility in the 1980s. As an adult, Brianna got interested in what it was used for, who ran it, who lived there.

[D]

So I really started with that question of, like, what was this weird place in our community? And it kind of spiraled out from there.

[B]

And what she found was that for as long as the federal government has restricted immigration, it's struggled to find enough space, which is why it's often relied on local county jails in rural communities like the one in Franklin County, New York, to help them out.

[D]

Part of the utility of using local jails is that these spaces already exist. Basically, every county has a local jail of some sort. So if you are dealing with routes that are shifting, if you are dealing with laws that are changing and targeting different groups of people, the idea that you can just basically have a detention footprint in every community in America is really, really intriguing.

[B]

Today, the US has an expansive immigration detention system spread out over federal facilities, private prisons, state prisons, and county jails. And it's exploded under both Democratic and Republican presidents. Now the Trump administration wants to find or build the space to detain at least 100,000 immigrants on any given night. And it has $45 billion allocated in the one big beautiful bill to do. Just needs a lot more partners.

[F]

State of Indiana has just become the latest state to cooperate with the Department of Homeland Security and open an ICE detention facility and has been given the nickname the Speedway Slammer.

[D]

A new ICE facility being called the.

[B]

Cornhusker Clink is opening in Nebraska.

[A]

Alligator Alcatraz is being dismantled.

[G]

Florida will open a second detention center.

[F]

It's not Alligator Alcatraz, it's Deportation Depot.

[D]

A major new immigration detention facility has quietly opened in California's Mojave Desert.

[C]

I'm Ramtin Arablouei.

[B]

And I'm Rund Abdelfattah. On this episode of Throughline, the business of migrant detention.

[H]

Hi, my name is Susan Rosas. Although I was born and raised here, I spent the last 20 years living outside the United States and Throughline has really helped me understand the current situation in the United States and to feel like I have a place here. You're listening to Throughline from npr.

[A]

This message comes from Sony Pictures Classics. In Eleanor the Great, June Squibb brings to vivid Life the spirited 94 year old Eleanor Morgenstein, who, after a devastating loss, tells a tale that spirals beyond her control. From director Scarlett Johansson comes a comically poignant exploration of how the stories we hear become the stories we tell. Deadline puts it there won't be a dry eye in the house. Eleanor the Great only in theaters September 26th.

[I]

This message comes from Schwab at Schwab. How you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices. You can invest and trade on your own, plus get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award winning service, low costs and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more support for.

[A]

This podcast and the following message come from Strawberry Me. Be honest. Are you happy with your job? Are you stuck in a job you've outgrown or never wanted in the first place? Are your reasons for staying really just excuses for not leaving? Let a career coach from Strawberry Me help you get unstuck. Discover the benefits of having a dedicated career coach in your corner and claim a special offer at Strawberry Me. NPR this message comes from NPR sponsor Shopify. No idea where to sell? Shopify puts you in control of every sales channel. It is the commerce platform revolutionizing millions of businesses worldwide. Whether you're a garage entrepreneur or IPO ready, Shopify is the only tool you need to start, run, and grow your business without the struggle. Once you've reached your audience, Shopify has the Internet's best converting checkout to help you turn them from browsers to buyers. Go to Shopify.com NPR to take your business to the next level today.

[D]

Part 1 the collaborator when you think of the landscape of immigration at the turn of the 20th century, there's big immigration sites like Ellis Island. Maybe folks have heard of angel island in San Francisco. These are the US's kind of main immigration stations. But there's no real plan for what happens if they all start entering through some obscure little route in northern New York.

[C]

And this is the situation that the reporter Pulteney Bigelow stumbled across in 1903 when he discovered that the local jail in rural Franklin County, New York was overcrowded with Chinese migrants awaiting hearings to determine whether they'd be deported or allowed into the United States. And the local sheriff was happy to have them.

[D]

The sheriff is a guy named Ernest Douglas. He's a pretty standard, ordinary rural sheriff. He's got a big mustache and a big hat, and he's got a long career in law enforcement. But I think that his incentives are incredibly clear.

[C]

It was about money.

[D]

Sheriffs in most of the country at this point in history operated on something called a fee system. So they didn't get an annual salary. Your salary as sheriff would have depended on how many sort of sheriff related tasks you did. You get a payment for like how many summonses you send, but sort of the number. The backbone of your income was how many people you held in the local jail. So your salary was directly dependent on that. So once he finds that he can start detaining immigrants, right at the behest of the federal government, this is a pretty spectacular new income source for the sheriff.

[C]

Personally?

[D]

Yeah, personally, right. It's not even money going into the local economy at this point. It is money the sheriff is personally pocketing. So some reports say he makes like $20,000 in three years, which is a lot of money for a sheriff.

[E]

How long are these prisoners there?

[D]

The average detention in northern New York hovers around three months. It's way longer than migrants were detained on average. And when you think about the conditions that they were in, these are not spaces designed for long term detentions. They are not spaces that were ever designed to hold detention immigrants.

[C]

But not only was Sheriff Douglas making money for every person he held in jail, Pulteney Bigelow reported that it was easy money.

[D]

And he says, when I Talked to the sheriff. The sheriff didn't seem disturbed at all by the number of Chinese migrants coming through Malone. In fact, he seems delighted. His exact line is, he treats the Chinese migrants as pets.

[F]

The householders like them, and they would like to have more of them. My friends about the jail praised their general cleanliness, industry, docility. There are never any fights among them. No quarreling. They give no trouble to anyone.

[C]

These were people who were locked up not because they committed a violent crime. They were jailed for trying to enter the US Illegally. So they were kind of ideal inmates that were bringing in consistent cash for Sheriff Douglas.

[D]

The sheriff has very little incentive to make this a better situation.

[C]

But soon there would be a problem for Sheriff Douglas.

[D]

All of these Chinese migrants, basically, to the person while they're detained in Malone, are filing habeas corpus claims.

[C]

Habeas corpus claims are where detainees can challenge their detention in court, essentially saying they're being unlawfully detained. And how are they claiming that they.

[D]

Are saying that they are American citizens.

[E]

Oh, interesting.

[D]

And they're saying they are being illegally detained because they are American citizens.

[C]

This was actually a popular legal strategy at the time, even though very few of them were actually American citizens, But.

[D]

They realized the courts had very little sort of evidence to disprove that they were American citizens. So one of the other remarkable things that you can see in sort of the jail ledgers is that even though these people are being detained for so long, very few of them are actually being deported. Almost all of them win their legal cases and leave Malone and go into the United States. You can imagine that most migrants who were making this journey probably had in their minds that they would be jailed, that this jailing was part of what it took to get into the United States, but that eventually, if they could stop, stick through this miserable couple months, that the US Government actually didn't really have the ammunition to deny them entry.

[B]

Federal officials were upset at what was happening in Malone. They mostly blamed the commissioners making these decisions, but they also thought there might be some other kind of corruption happening, and they wanted other places to detain the growing number of Chinese migrants coming across the border.

[D]

What we start to see is that the immigration service starts calling sheriffs in neighboring communities and saying, would you guys also like to hold some Chinese migrants? And this is where things get really testy. We basically start to see these counties competing with each other and making arguments for, like, why you should send Chinese migrants to my county and not my neighbor. And one of the things that they do to sort of up the Ante and how they compete is that they start building separate segregated jails. So rather than putting Chinese migrants in the sort of regular local jail, they build what they call Chinese jails so they can say, look, we have this, like, brand new facility just for your detention needs. So, you know, please keep sending migrants through our county and not through our neighbors. So you really see the emergence of a market.

[B]

This market wasn't just the 50 cents a day that sheriffs got for each detainee. There was money going into the local economy for food, jobs, witnesses coming through, staying at hotels who would testify in the hearings. One newspaper estimated that Malone would lose around $50,000 a year if, quote, Chinese business moved east. And it did. During this period in the early 1900s, four New York counties were benefiting from these deals with the federal government.

[D]

It is actively commoditizing people. And, you know, the people who are making money off of this see that they are fighting for these contracts from the federal government.

[B]

But in 1904, things would start to change. The US government brought a case against 32 Chinese people detained in Malone, challenging their habeas corpus claims. The case made it to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the government giving the Department of Commerce and labor the power to deport them. The department had taken over Administration of U.S. immigration the year before. Since most immigration laws were meant to protect American workers, People have real ethical.

[D]

And moral quandaries about this. People are uncomfortable from the very beginning, even in places like Malone, about what is happening here. And I think that sort of public concern spikes when deaths happen while people are awaiting these hearings and deportations.

[F]

Three of the Chinamen detained here died last week at the detention house. There have been 120 or 130 in the place. And after two had died out of this number, which was a pretty large death rate, others being ill, Dr. Wildling was asked to investigate. He found three of them dangerously sick and a large number ailing. One of the three died the next morning after being removed to more favorable quarters.

[H]

The Malone Farmer.

[F]

January 1904.

[B]

Chinese men detained in the jail wrote a letter pleading for help that said, quote, there are many deaths in this wooden detention house. A total of 17 Chinese men would die in Franklin county facilities before the Supreme Court ruling.

[D]

So this is a quote from a newspaper called the Malone Farmer. The present Chinese exclusion law and its administration is a shame upon civilized government. And they go on to say there ought to be some other way of handling them other than placing them behind locked doors and barred windows as Illegal.

[C]

Entry slowed down along the northern New York border. Some counties which had relied on money from the federal government made pleas to bring back Chinese detainees. St. Lawrence county, just to the west of Franklin county, went as far as to adopt a resolution claiming they were being discriminated against by not receiving more Chinese immigrants. Franklin and other neighboring counties would continue detaining people into the early 20th century, but never at the level they first did.

[D]

Once enough people find out that this migration route is a thing, it's kind of a good indication that it's time to move on. So right around this period, too, we're gonna see most Chinese migrants are gonna start entering through Mexico rather than Canada.

[C]

What does it foreshadow about the future.

[E]

Of migrant detention in the United States?

[D]

I think what it foreshadows is that the immigration service in these years, but also today their mandate is gargantuan. Their task at the turn of the 20th century is to bar Chinese immigrants from this huge country. They're incredibly, incredibly small. As an agency, they realize that in order to make deportations happen, they need collaborators, and some of their best collaborators. The collaborators they are most interested in pursuing is sheriffs and local law enforcement.

[B]

Coming up, things get tense when the federal government opens its own sites in rural America.

[H]

Hello, this is Kendra from Hampton, Georgia, and you're listening to Throughline from npr. I love your show so much because I always feel like when I listen to the show, I'm getting a more complex understanding of the history, not just one side.

[I]

This message comes from Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort. Journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, destination focused dining and cultural enrichment on board and on shore. And every Viking voyage is all inclusive with no children and no casinos.

[A]

Discover [e-mail] this message comes from Progressive Insurance. Do you ever find yourself playing the budgeting game? Well, with the name your price tool from Progressive, you can find options that fit your budget and potentially lower your bills. Try [e-mail], progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Price and coverage match limited by state law. Not available in all states. This message comes from Progressive Insurance. Progressive makes it easy to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies. Try [e-mail] Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states.

[B]

Part 2 the prison business In August of 1948, a woman named Ellen Knopf was detained at Ellis Island. At first, no one knew why. Immigration officials considered her a security risk, and she wasn't given a hearing. It was the start of the Cold War and the United States was worried about who was coming into the country. The Department of Justice now oversaw immigration in the US Hoping it would provide better oversight than the Department of Labor.

[D]

The sort of Ellis island that we think of is of distant memory.

[B]

This is Brianna Nofil, author of the Migrants, An American History of Mass Incarceration.

[D]

It is basically by the forties, a site of long term detention for people.

[B]

Who the US Fears are subversive, communists, fascists, or people like Ellen Knopf. Noff was German born, but left when Hitler rose to power. She would eventually end up a refugee in England serving in the Royal Air Force, where she met and married an American serviceman and then found herself stuck on Ellis island and in the middle of a controversy. Why was the government detaining Knopf without disclosing why?

[D]

And she kind of becomes this celebrity, emblematic of the excesses of detention power.

[B]

Ellis island, by this time in the late 1940s had become less of a processing center granting access to the country and more of a detention center where people would stay months or in the case of Ellen Knopf, two years while awaiting a court hearing.

[D]

Activists are going to use the language of this is totally at odds with everything we are claiming about civil liberties in the United States in this early Cold War moment.

[B]

Knoff's case would eventually make it all the way to the US Supreme Court, which ruled that the US Government could deny Knopf entry and didn't have to disclose why. But pressure continued, and after almost two years of being detained, she was granted an immigration hearing where witnesses testified she was a communist spy. But the evidence didn't hold up. And In November of 1951, she left Ellis island, admitted for permanent residence, dressed.

[G]

In a powder blue suit and a dark blue topcoat, she boarded the ferry that left Ellis island at 7:30 o'.

[H]

Clock.

[G]

Ten minutes later, reporters and photographers gathered around her as the ferry berthed at the Manhattan Pier. The New York Times.

[B]

Knopf's story happened under President Harry truman. But in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower's administration would take immigration policy in a new direction.

[D]

And they make this statement. They say, we are only going to use immigration detention in very exceptional circumstances.

[B]

Those circumstances included detaining people who were, quote, likely to abscond or those whose freedom of movement could be adverse to the national security or the public's safety.

[D]

I've got the quote from Eisenhower. He says, through humane administration, the Department of Justice is doing what it legally can to alleviate hardships. And he says the imprisonment of aliens awaiting admission or deportation has been stopped.

[B]

Instead, immigrants coming to the US would be released on, quote, conditional parole or bond or supervision. Brianna says this move by Eisenhower reminded her of what happened after the Immigration act of 1924 was passed, which set quotas for how many people could enter from a particular country. At the time, the US was worried about the influx of immigrants after World War I, significantly from Eastern European countries, but also from Asian and other non white countries too.

[D]

But what we start to see changing is that many of these sheriffs and these jails are not excited about the prospect of, of incarcerating European migrants. And they are particularly not excited about the idea of incarcerating European women and children. They say this is bringing us all sorts of bad publicity. This isn't worth it. Right. The money is not worth all the negative publicity.

[B]

Money and bad publicity were reasons why Eisenhower wanted to stop long term immigration detention in the mid-50s.

[D]

This is a major sea change. And I think in a lot of ways, scholars have looked to this as a sort of hopeful moment. Right. If you're trying to kind of imagine what a world without immigration detention might look like, it's really quite powerful that the President essentially declared that he was discontinuing this practice altogether and instead paroling.

[B]

People into the US while their immigration status was pending.

[D]

But there is, you know, as there often is, right. A really big caveat. Even as Eisenhower is proclaiming this era of humane immigration administration, he is really only talking about places like Ellis island, places that mostly deal with Europeans. Detention is rapidly expanding on the southern border.

[C]

After World War II, Mexican migrants became a target of deportation. They had been encouraged to come to the US legally during the war through the Bracero program, which allowed them to work on farms, planting and harvesting crops. But the agricultural industry also hired Mexican migrants who had entered illegally so they could pay them less. Now, in 1954, the Eisenhower administration began what would become the largest deportation campaign in US history, known as Operation Wetback, a derogatory racial epithet widely used at the time.

[F]

The roundup of Wetback swung into its second day today with the first day's catch of more than 2,000 illegal immigrants termed Very Successful Evening Vanguard, June 18, 1954.

[D]

It kind of embodies the, I think some of like the hypocrisy at the core of this because the US invites tens of thousands of Mexican laborers to come to the country during the war, right. To sort of fill these absolutely critical agricultural labor needs. When it decides it does not need this group of people anymore. Right. Virtually overnight, they become illegal.

[C]

So then how did the Eisenhower administration claim that the United States government is ending detention?

[D]

So the Immigration Service is quite intentional.

[C]

The federal government data on Mexican detention was not consistent, and officials would sometimes categorize Mexican migrants separately to make the point that they'd abolished detention.

[D]

They're often seen as sort of not really immigrants. The immigration service sees immigrants as people who come and stay permanently, and they see Mexicans as seasonal workers. They see Mexicans as people who come and go. But the immigration service is able to say, this is like a separate category of person. That doesn't really count for what we're doing.

[C]

The Justice Department and its Immigration and naturalization service, or ins, had been trying for a few years to convince Congress to give them more money to ramp up the tensions and deportations of Mexican migrants along the border. And this included building federal detention centers. And they wanted to put one near the southern tip of Texas in the city of Brownsville, which already had contracts with the feds to hold migrants in its jail.

[D]

So when they announced plans to build this federal camp in Brownsville, the government is pretty shocked that they get so much pushback from localities. Some of it is about conditions. Some of it is about the morality, But a lot of it is localities saying, listen, we built bigger jails in our communities because the immigration service told us they needed that space.

[G]

Much of the opposition to the building of a federal detention camp is based on the claim that county jails have expended money to enlarge the jails and improve the facilities to meet federal requirements.

[C]

The Brownsville Herald Congressman Lynn and Lloyd Benson, whose district covered Roundsville, addressed Congress saying that counties will be, quote, left holding the bag because the immigration bureau decides it wants to increase its staff and duties and go into the prison business on a grandiose scale. It seemed like everything was working against the federal government's proposal in Brownsville. There were even contests in the local newspaper to name the detention center with names like mexicalcatraz or Sultry Siberia.

[D]

And then shortly after that, a newspaper in Odessa gives what I think is another just sort of incredibly prescient quote about what was to come. They say, quote, now apparently these counties are stuck with big jails and nobody to put in them but each other. The immigration Service and the Border Patrol prefer a concentration camp of their own.

[E]

In this case, this doesn't sound like an economic benefit to the local community or to any particular sheriff or one person. And it Also sounds like they're spending, the federal government spending a ton of money on this. Is it just for political reasons? Who is benefiting ultimately economically, or is anyone benefiting economically from this process?

[D]

It's a great question. Right? So they would. They would claim that this is an economically driven decision. They would claim they are protecting American farm workers. They would claim that this, you know, critical for the future of agricultural labor. But I think you see on the ground in terms of sort of how communities feel about this, it's really contentious. It's contentious not only because of the questions about we could be making all this money off our jail, but many growers in South Texas are incredibly resistant to these mass deportation efforts. There's sort of countless stories about growers like pulling guns on immigration agents or sort of putting boards with nails around their property to try to kind of puncture the tires of anyone who might try to carry out an immigration raid on their facilities. And some of the most critical voices of the conditions at these detention camps are these big agricultural players in South Texas. And, you know, I think we should always sort of look a little side eyed to them. Like they're often putting it in really moralistic terms, but they have a really strong financial incentive to keep this, you know, inexpensive labor that they have depended on for decades and decades.

[G]

No one has given a good reason, and certainly none has been advanced for the construction of a stockade in which to herd the aliens whose only crime has been their desire to come to this country to make a living working on valley farms and to aid in the economy of this area. The Brownsville Herald.

[C]

There was so much pushback to the site in Brownsville that the federal government backed out of the plan and looked for another location, which it found in the city of McAllen, about 60 mile drive west from Brownsville. McAllen welcomed the site, even paying for some of the infrastructure itself. And when it opened In April of 1953, it became a major hub of migrant detention and deportation for Operation Wetback.

[E]

How does this represent a turning point point in migrant detention in US History?

[D]

I think it's important that we see that the federal government is willing to build its own deportation infrastructure. They've also realized, I think really notably that these long term detentions of Europeans got a ton of sort of, you know, activists. The ACLU is involved. Like people are really upset about these folks. People are not as up upset about, you know, thousands of sort of nameless imagine is like faceless Mexican migrants who are cycling through these sites. That is seen as sort of not as. Not as offensive, I think, to a lot of Americans. So, you know, for an agency that is trying to figure out the boundaries of what is politically viable, what sort of administrative incarceration can you run without everyone accusing you of, like, having a gulag? I think they basically start to realize they have just more wiggle room on the southwest border. They can build this infrastructure and not have every American outraged about it.

[E]

What I take away, too, is like, this is a major insertion of the federal government into this game. By game, I mean this business. This is becoming a show now.

[D]

I think it is right. And I think the other thing that we start to see that's going to become really important in the years to come is that they start really imagining detention as something that might deter people from coming altogether. If people know that they're going to come here and they're going to have this sort of miserable limbo period where they are incarcerated, right, where they're going to suffer, that maybe this is a thing we can use to deter migration more broadly.

[E]

But what's fascinating about this, though, is that in Franklin county, many of the Chinese immigrants kind of just saw it as the right of passage into the United States. Why do they think that suddenly people are not going to view it that way, that are coming into the country from Mexico?

[D]

They say, well, these detentions are really short. And for the most part, they are really short. This is not the case at Franklin county where there's legal action, where you might be able to see a judge, where you might have seen some semblance of rights. So most of these people are only going to stay in these detention camps for like, you know, one, two, three nights. The US Is just deporting more people. It is more successful in removing people.

[C]

There was a period of more liberal immigration policy in the 1960s. The national quota law was abolished and deportations overall went down. But that didn't stop people from illegally entering the US and in just a couple of decades, illegal entry to the.

[E]

US Was about to blow up.

[D]

I think there's sort of a thread here that is like any of these things that the US Government does, whether it is a law barring every single person from a country or whether it is sort of unprecedented energy into these raids and mass deportations in the Southwest. Like, none of this actually fundamentally cuts off people's access to migrant labor, and none of this fundamentally completely stops people from migrating.

[B]

Coming up, the golden handcuffs of migrant attention.

[H]

Hi, this is Reza calling from Tehran, Iran. It's a blessing to listen to a proofread podcast at these turbulent times. This is through line from the NPR thank you.

[A]

This message comes from BetterHelp. It's only human to ask others for advice, like turning to your barista, hairdresser, or a taxi driver for life advice. But when you're looking for help about relationships, anxiety, depression or other clinical issues, they may not have all the right answers. Instead, get guidance from a licensed therapist online with BetterHelp. Visit betterhelp.com NPR for 10% off your first month.

[I]

This message comes from NPR sponsor 1Password Protect your digital life with 1Password if you're tired of family members constantly texting you for the passwords to streaming services, 1Password lets you securely share or remove access to logins access from any device anytime. 1Password lets you securely switch between iPhone, Android, Mac and PC with convenient features like autofill for quick sign ins. Right now, get a free two week trial for you and your [e-mail] NPR.

[D]

Part 3 A pillar of Mass Incarceration.

[B]

A standoff continues tonight in Oakdale, Louisiana, where hundreds of Cubans held at a federal detention center are holding at least 20 guards hostage.

[H]

The inmates have been communicating some of their demands on hand painted signs.

[F]

Officials don't know exactly how many hostages there are or even who they are. No list has been compiled.

[H]

There has been no change in negotiations. Talks are not yet scheduled to resume.

[B]

In 1980, 7, Cuban immigrants detained in two facilities, one in Atlanta and another in a small rural communication community of Oakdale, Louisiana, took over their detention centers, holding guards hostage in both locations.

[F]

Most of these Cubans came to this country seven years ago in the Mariel Boat Lift.

[B]

The US had welcomed refugees coming over on the Mariel boat lift in 1980, when tens of thousands of Cuban immigrants fled Castro's repressive government to seek asylum. Many of them had become permanent residents in the U.S. but one of the.

[D]

Populations that is going to sort of prove to be particularly troubling for the immigration service is Cubans who have an interaction with the criminal justice system in the US who are convicted of a crime. So in theory, the US Wants to deport these people back to Cuba, but Castro sort of hardline refuses to take them.

[B]

This is Brianna Nofil, author of the Migrants An American History of Mass Incarceration.

[D]

So what that means is that the US now has a population of people who have finished their criminal sentence who are now being held administratively as migrant detainees, but for whom there is no path to deportation, right? So it raises this really important and really thorny question of can the US hold people indefinitely?

[B]

The US Government had been preparing for something like this. A few years before these 1987 uprisings, the federal government, led by a young associate Attorney General named Rudy Giuliani, had secured funding to build permanent detention centers, a collaboration between the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Bureau of Prisons. Now they just needed somewhere to build them.

[F]

This week, the U.S. immigration and Naturalization Service opened a new detention center in rural Oakdale, Louisiana, about 200 miles from New Orleans.

[D]

The Oakdale mayor launches this all out effort to get this site for his community.

[B]

After the furniture factories left, the paper bag plant went out of business and the lumber mill closed, this town was dying.

[D]

This sort of town sees itself as needing a sort of financial silver bullet. And they say this immigration detention center is going to be it.

[F]

Helping to lower unemployment which had been the highest in the country.

[D]

Oakdale is hosting all night prayer vigils to pray that the Immigration Service puts the detention center in this community. They are hosting these like Cajun cookouts that they're inviting immigration officials to. And immigration officials basically cannot believe their luck. Right? They're like, this is not going to be as hard as we thought. If we can pitch this as a financial solution that made Mayor George Moad.

[B]

Fight hard to bring the Federal Government's new 17 and a half million dollar alien detention center to Oakdale.

[E]

The illegal alien problem is a problem that's here. It's going to get worse.

[D]

Something has to be done about it. And also, Ray, if we can pitch that these are immigrants, these are not, you know, people who are accused of murder. Right. These aren't. These aren't your typical criminals with big air quotes. Right? Then people are going to say, great. You know, this is actually a better alternative to hosting a state prison or a federal prison. Wow.

[E]

Yeah, because it doesn't have the sense of ugliness. Like you don't think there's murderers or rapists in these facilities. There's just people trying to get into the country. They'll be here temporarily. They'll be sent away. Why not?

[B]

But shortly after the Oakdale Detention center opened In April of 1986, it would receive a group of Cuban immigrants who were deemed excludable from residing in the U.S. these were Cubans who did commit crimes either before or after they arrived and some who had mental health problems. The US couldn't deport them because Fidel Castro refused to take them back. And the US didn't want them to stay either. So they sat in Oakdale in a kind of limbo.

[D]

If you are looking for kind of a powder keg of a situation, it is kind of hard to imagine people who feel more desperate than people for whom there is absolutely no clear plan. There is no path either to going back to where you're from or no clear path for being released into the United States.

[F]

Cuban authorities and the U.S. immigration Service reached an agreement that calls for the return to Cuba of 2,500 Cubans in US custody.

[D]

And then finally, in November 1987, they say, incredible, incredible news, right? We've got a deal. Castro has agreed to take a large number of these migrants back to Cuba. This news is going to filter in to this group of people who has been detained in these prisons for years. Many of these people feared retribution if they were sent back to Cuba. They imagined they would be seen as defectors from the regime. They imagined that they would spend life in perhaps you know, even more gruesome prisons if they were sent back. So when they hear the news, right, that this agreement is happening, that their sort of, you know, deportation is potentially imminent, people are explosively angry.

[F]

They fashioned some homemade machetes and swords.

[D]

First at Oakdale and took 28 hostages.

[C]

Many of them guards at the facility.

[D]

Then a couple days later at Atlanta.

[H]

We'Re still talking with the inmates. Just yesterday, negotiators were confident they'd reached an agreement. There was a handshake. All that was missing were Cuban signatures on a dotted line. Today those signatures are still missing.

[D]

And they say, we are not letting these people go until you promise us you will not send us back.

[H]

Federal authorities plan to wait out the.

[F]

Cuban army of officers outside the fence has agreed not to storm the compound.

[D]

It's this incredible, incredible sort of political action, and it is an incredible media spectacle.

[H]

This community of Oakdale is being worn down by the crisis.

[F]

This was supposed to be such a good thing for the local economy.

[H]

Supposed to be.

[D]

These end up being the longest hostage standoffs in American history. The Atlanta One is 11 days long, which is really remarkable because there's kind of so little memory of it.

[B]

The hostages were freed after the Cubans were promised that the US Government would review everyone's cases.

[D]

But in the meantime, right, they no longer want to hold people in two facilities. Right. They now have this idea that this was kind of a recipe for disaster, that if you hold too many people together, it is giving people ammunition for organizing. So they say, we're going to turn away from these two federal prisons and we're going to look back to our Old pals, our old allies, the county sheriffs. So they start calling county sheriffs throughout the country, but particularly in Louisiana, and they say a very similar deal to what sheriffs were pitched a hundred years ago.

[E]

So it was seen as a way out of this situation with these revolts, basically, to go back to the old model.

[D]

Yeah, it is something that the Immigration Service kind of continually goes back and forth with over its history. Like, there's a tension between do we want to have a few centralized sites of immigration detention, or do we want to sort of see. Scatter people among as many sites as possible? Right. And that maybe that decentralization, that lack of visibility, maybe that gives the Immigration Service more power, not only in kind of deterring organizing, but also, like, it's harder for the American public to get really angry about conditions at a detention center if people are at 300 detention centers versus two.

[B]

And one of the sheriffs that gets a call from the US Government is Sheriff Bill Belt.

[D]

He's in a community called Devoyles Parish, which is sort of perfectly in the heart of Louisiana. And Louisiana, as we saw in Oakdale, right. Had massive financial challenges in the 1980s. They had some of the highest unemployment in the country. The price of petroleum is absolutely plummeting, which has all these ramifications. So these are communities that are very, very desperate for sort of any economic lifeline. So they call Bill Belt and they say, you know, are you willing to hold these people in your jail? And he says, yes, absolutely.

[C]

Does it work out for them?

[E]

Like, does this actually create a sustained economic boost?

[D]

So he builds, over the course of his time in office, 1300 detention beds in a community of just over 40,000 people. The sheriff's office, within eight years, it is employing 400 people. And by the end of the 1990s, there are five detention facilities operating in Evoyles Parish, which is just absolutely staggering. They don't stay open forever, but many of them stay open for years. And people throughout the country start to pay attention. Folks are seeing what Bell is doing in his parish, and they are saying, huh, it doesn't seem like demand for immigration detention space is going away. Like, maybe this is the industry of the future.

[C]

After the Oakdale and Atlanta prison riots, dozens of local jails and correctional centers contracted with the federal government to detain Cuban. Cuban immigrants. Avoyo's Parish would detain the most. It wasn't just Cubans who were being detained in the 1980s. Crime rates were spiking. There was a crack epidemic. Mass incarceration in General was on the rise and Congress passed tougher immigration and crime laws. And soon private prisons started getting contracts with the federal government for detaining immigrants.

[D]

So private prison companies are going to say, the jails are great, the jails are all good and fine, but we can build you new special immigrant only facilities faster and cheaper. Why don't you also consider working with us?

[C]

One of the major private prison providers in the US at the time, known as Corrections Corporation of America, or cca, got its first federal contract ever for detaining immigrants.

[D]

I think there's like one version of the story where you go, okay, so we don't need sheriffs anymore, right? We just bring in all of these guys in suits who can run it for a fraction of the price. But that doesn't happen. Even as private prison companies are going to take on greater and greater shares of the market, the Immigration Service never seriously loses its dependence on jails. And I think that's for a few reasons. I think one is geographic, that idea that a jail gives you a footprint everywhere in the country. But the other thing we see is that these private prison companies are just wrecked with problems. Particularly in the 90s, there's massive scandals.

[E]

There were stories about escapes, about abuse.

[C]

Of guards and poor health care. In one infamous case at a detention center in Elizabeth, New Jersey, detainees alleged they were tortured and beaten by guards, lacked fresh air and sunlight, and lived with vermin.

[D]

Many of these companies think they are not even going to be able to kind of stay afloat financially. Their financial forecast looks so bad because there's high profile breakouts and there's uprisings. And people from both political parties start to say maybe this actually isn't something we should have privatized. So when these scandals happen, when these uprisings happen, the Immigration Service uses this, this basically strategy they've used for 100 years, which is that they say, we're going to take people out of the site where there's a problem and we're going to scatter them among these jails. So we're going to kind of take the focus or the heat off of this one site and we are going to, you know, decentralize. We are going to obscure people, we are going to hide people in this sort of network of sites that we have, rather than letting this one contentious site be the focus.

[C]

Brianna says that immigration officials often explain these decisions as a response to overcrowding, but that's not how many of the people who are detained see it.

[E]

And there's a ton of poor rural communities around the country.

[D]

Absolutely.

[E]

That are in desperate positions that might.

[D]

Be open to this for sure. And this is something that is so clear in Louisiana today. Right. Like many communities in Louisiana have said, you know, we could not afford to keep. Keep our jails open in these communities if we were not getting these deals with ice. This is not like a footnote to the story of mass incarceration. Right. It is a pillar of mass incarceration.

[E]

Okay. If federal government's spending all this money to detain and then deport people, and a lot of times they're coming back in the country and it's not actually achieving anything economically in terms of supporting American workers, and it's actually hurting American companies. Why, like, why are they doing this if there's no material benefit to the economy or to protecting workers?

[D]

To me, it is a core question of sort of who is an American. Immigration detention's roots are in this moment. That is so blatantly racist. That sort of, you know, the Chinese Exclusion act pulls no punches about what it is doing. It is targeted to a specific group of people. But that is where we get the legal precedence that undergird this entire system today. It is a system that has only really ever, to my opinion, receded. Immigration detention is only really ever rolled back when it is seen as threatening whiteness. And it is a system that has, you know, continually expanded and gained public support by, you know, targeting racialized people, by targeting people who Americans are encouraged to imagine as maybe kind of criminal anyway. Right. It is doing political work, and it is doing work that I think is like, really revealing about how the nation sees itself.

[E]

I guess I have trouble fully understanding that. I hear you about the origins of the. Of. Of this process being built in racism with the Chinese Exclusionary Act. But like, President Obama also expanded, you know, immigration, detention, et cetera, during his period. And, you know, you know, I don't think President Obama's policies in general were racist or that it was a racist approach, but I do think he saw a huge political advantage to pursuing this. Because every president, every politician wants to be appearing to protect the rights of the in group.

[C]

It seems to me this all comes.

[E]

Back to power and that it seems really easy. This is such an easy power.

[D]

I think the question is, right, it's like, who do you blame for problems? And that is the question that the federal government has been trying to answer. And it has continually come to the answer that the group to blame four problems. And that problem can look different, right? The problem can be health, it can be crime. It can be poverty, independence. But the immigrants, they are outsiders almost by design, right? That is, that is what defines them. They came from somewhere else. And so that has proven to be a very flexible category on which to kind of project whatever social crisis you Immigration detention is a deeply bipartisan project. Like, this is absolutely not a story about sort of Republicans expanding it and Democrats trying to roll it back. This is a story about both parties coming to a consensus, right, that migration is criminal and that it should be punished or administered through the same infrastructure and system that we use to punish, you know, people who we have have moved through the criminal legal system.

[B]

That's it for this week's show. I'm Rund Abdelfatah.

[C]

And I'm Ramtin Arablouei. You've been listening to throughline from npr.

[B]

This episode was produced by me and.

[C]

Me and Lawrence Wu, Julie Kane, Anya.

[D]

Steinberg, Casey Miner, Christina Kim, Devon Katayama, Sarah Wyman, Irene Noguchi.

[C]

Fact checking for this episode was done by Kevin Voelkel.

[B]

Thanks to Jonathan Bastian for their voiceover work.

[C]

Thank you to Johannes Durgi, Laura Schwartz, Edith Chapin and Colin Campbell. This episode was mixed by Jimmy Kim.

[B]

Music for this episode was composed by Ramtin and his band Drop Electric, which includes Anya Mizani, Navid Marvi, Sho Fujiwara.

[C]

And finally, if you have an idea or like something you heard on the show, please write [e-mail] and make sure to follow us on Apple, Spotify or the NPR app. That way you'll never miss an episode.

[B]

Thanks for listening.

[A]

This message comes from Mint Mobile. Mint Mobile took what's wrong with wireless and made it right. They offer premium wireless plans for less and all plans include high speed data, unlimited talk and text and nationwide coverage. See for [e-mail] Switch this message comes from Warby Parker. Prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable. Glasses designed in house from premium materials starting at just $95, including prescription lenses. Stop by a Warby Parker store near you.

[I]

This message comes from Bombas. You need better socks and slippers and underwear because you should love what you wear every day. One purchased equals one donated. Go to bombus.com NPR and use code NPR for 20% off.