Timcast IRL – Episode Summary
Episode Title: ABC Revives Jimmy Kimmel After Terror Attack On Station, Sinclair Refuses To Air Show w/ Augustus Doricko
Air Date: September 23, 2025
Host: Tim Pool
Guests: Augustus Doricko (Rainmaker), Shane Cashman, Tate Brown, Phil Labonte
Overview
This episode of Timcast IRL dives deeply into the political, media, and cultural fallout following a terror attack at an ABC affiliate, the controversial return of Jimmy Kimmel to late night television, the cancellation of a tribute to Charlie Kirk due to threats, and Trump’s designation of Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. The discussion is fueled by a mix of hard news analysis, cultural commentary, and passionate debate spanning topics from media strategy to free speech, tech influence, and societal violence. Augustus Doricko of Rainmaker also joins for a spirited discussion about cloud seeding, environmental intervention, and the ethics of tech solutions in crisis.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Jimmy Kimmel’s Return & ABC’s Decision
-
Background:
Kimmel was suspended from ABC following inflammatory comments about Charlie Kirk and faced advertiser and affiliate backlash. -
Media Response:
Speculation ensues as to why ABC reversed the suspension; Tim suggests the decision is less about ratings and more about responding to credible threats of terrorism and violence against ABC stations.“When faced with the threat of boycott, it's, you know, okay, that's a bad thing. ... But now they're receiving terroristic threats. ... A threat of a boycott means nothing. The threat of death means everything.” – Tim Pool [13:18]
-
Sinclair Broadcasting’s Position:
Pulled a planned Charlie Kirk tribute due to threats and announced they will preempt Jimmy Kimmel upon his return. Ongoing discussions with ABC over Kimmel’s future. -
Advertiser Pressure:
The group debates whether advertiser boycotts or physical security risks are more motivating for networks, with consensus forming that direct threats outweigh financial ones.
2. Violence Against Media & Political Tensions
-
ABC Affiliate Shooting:
Attacker left a note targeting Trump officials and referencing Charlie Kirk's assassination, intensifying fear and politicization of the media landscape. -
Political Interpretation:
Panel largely sees these attacks as left-aligned political violence, criticizing media and liberal figures for not condemning it.“Everyone still knows that it's the left and Democrats and Democrat politicians will not condemn it.” – Phil Labonte [16:29]
-
Civil Strife & Culture War:
The conversation draws analogies to revolutionary periods, historical unrest, and “civil strife,” arguing that violence is becoming normalized as a political tool.“It feels like reality is just hanging on by a thread.” – Shane Cashman [45:53]
3. Trump Designates Antifa a Domestic Terrorist Organization
-
Order & Implications:
Trump’s executive order gives law enforcement new levers (potentially RICO, social media bans). Question raised: Will tech and media companies comply by removing Antifa supportive material? -
Tech Company Compliance:
Mixed predictions—some expect compliance to avoid DOJ scrutiny; others doubt YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), and Facebook will actually follow through due to internal alignment and business calculations.“If YouTube keeps up these antifa videos, ... they are outright saying Trump's authority doesn't mean anything.” – Tim Pool [68:57]
"I don't think Zuckerberg is committed to an ideology. ... What does he care if ... a handful of users that are ... committed to their ideology [get] wrapped up? He's talking about the entire planet." – Phil Labonte [71:15]
-
Social Order Bifurcation:
Tim argues that failure to comply would demonstrate an irreparable split in the nation’s governing legitimacy and infrastructure.
4. Charlie Kirk Memorial & Media Narrative
-
Massive Memorial Broadcast:
Over 100 million watched the tribute; left-wing commentators derided it as a “Nazi rally."“...the Charlie Kirk Memorial is one of the greatest days in the history of this country. ...The response from people like Don Lemon and the left was to call it a Nazi rally.” – Tim Pool [74:07]
-
Media Criticism and Disbelief:
The panel expresses frustration at liberal figures celebrating Kirk’s death or downplaying the violence. -
Grief & Conspiracy Theories:
Discussion acknowledges conspiracy theories swirling around Kirk’s assassination, but the group—Tim especially—urges caution, more reliance on available evidence, and warns of distraction.
5. Society’s Normalization of Violence
-
Desensitization:
Cites the American public’s high tolerance for violence (e.g., crime headlines, entertainment trends), leading to a normalization of sporadic and political violence. -
Youth Perspective:
Augustus Doricko offers the insight that the Kirk assassination marks a "mass trauma event" for Gen Z, shifting perceptions about safety and political conflict."That feels like the first time I've ever been sensitized to ... political violence in the US. ... Now ... zoomers ... feel as though there is like imminent threat of violence..." – Augustus Doricko [47:18]
6. Debate: Cloud Seeding & Human Control Over Nature
-
Introduction of Augustus Doricko:
CEO of Rainmaker, leading US cloud seeding company, provides a technical explanation of cloud seeding’s role in agriculture and ecosystems. -
Debate with Shane Cashman:
Shane voices skepticism, likening weather manipulation to “playing God,” warning about unintended environmental side effects and the dystopian potential of tech intervention.“I think you are playing God.” – Shane Cashman [102:41]
“...the technical point ... is trying to live out the dominion mandate that God gave us ... to take dominion over the earth, ... not just for our benefit, but for the sake of creation’s well being...” – Augustus Doricko [102:56]
-
Ethics and Regulation:
Robust disagreement over whether cloud seeding should be banned, regulated, or embraced, with both sides referencing science, history, and theology."You don't have to be a climate alarmist to say...farms ... are going to collapse ... unless we produce more water. ...And even all of that said, we should scrutinize and regulate cloud seeding..." – Augustus Doricko [109:11]
-
Memorable Exchanges:
The debate is pointed but respectful, ending in mutual petitions for “meeting in the middle” (ironic, but unresolved).
7. Free Speech, Big Tech, and Government Power
-
Censorship Concerns:
The group examines how previous government pressure (DOJ, Biden admin) forced tech to censor conservative voices, and what would happen if Trump now exerts the same pressure in the opposite direction.“...there’s a very real question now. Declaration of a Terrorist Organization. ...If YouTube does not delete them, that shows ... our social order is formally bifurcated.” – Tim Pool [49:19]
-
Enforcement & Precedent:
Phil Labonte emphasizes the practical motivations for tech CEOs (“not ideologically committed to leftism”), suggesting that DOJ investigations would compel cooperation regardless of individual beliefs.“...the people that are higher ups, the people that actually have something to really lose if they don't comply with the DOJ. ...But the federal government can make their lives absolutely terrible.” – Phil Labonte [72:15]
Notable Quotes & Timestamps
-
On ABC's Motive for Kimmel's Return:
“A threat of a boycott means nothing. The threat of death means everything.”
— Tim Pool [13:18] -
On Cultural and Political Violence:
“It feels like reality is just hanging on by a thread.”
— Shane Cashman [45:53] -
On Normalization of Violence:
“The United States ... the threshold Americans have for violence is actually quite high.”
— Tate Brown [45:53] -
On Trump’s Antifa Declaration:
“There's a very real question now. Declaration of a Terrorist Organization... our social order is formally bifurcated.”
— Tim Pool [49:19] -
On Tech Compliance:
“...what does he care if there’s a handful of users that are ... committed to their ideology? ...His goals are far bigger than just ... what antifa’s after.”
— Phil Labonte [71:15] -
On Left’s Double Standards:
“The response from people like Don Lemon and the left was to call it a Nazi rally.”
— Tim Pool [74:07]
Section Timestamps
- Introduction, News Headlines, Kimmel Background:
[00:56–05:15] - Jimmy Kimmel’s Negotiations & Media Fallout:
[06:15–13:18] - Violence, Motivation, and ABC Shooting:
[13:18–16:23] - Civil Strife, Security Concerns:
[16:23–19:04] - Trump’s Executive Order on Antifa:
[49:19–53:16] - Tech, Free Speech, and Government Power:
[58:00–74:07] - Charlie Kirk Memorial & Grief Reaction:
[74:07–92:17] - Cloud Seeding & Environmental Ethics:
[99:46–112:28] - Closing, Super Chats:
[112:53–End]
Tone and Style
The episode is intensely conversational, often combative but with a sense of camaraderie. Political, cultural, and technological anxieties are at the forefront, expressed in blunt, sometimes irreverent language and humor. The tone is one of urgency, skepticism, and concern—punctuated by moments of dark comedy and shared exasperation.
Memorable Moments
-
Speculation on the Real Reason for Kimmel's Return:
Tim’s repeated assertion that ABC was motivated by fear, not business logic, and the group’s oft-cynical banter about media hypocrisy. -
Cloud Seeding Debate:
Passionate and at times theological back-and-forth between Augustus Doricko and Shane Cashman, each defending their philosophies of technology vs. "playing God". -
Reflections on Charlie Kirk’s Death:
Sober and personal reflections from Tim and guests about the real-world impact of losing a friend and the media’s reaction—an unusually emotional and raw segment for the show. -
Running Gags:
Tim’s dismissal of FCC conspiracy theories, jokes about secret shadow cabals, and playful ribbing about “fake rain from fake clouds”.
Conclusion
This episode of Timcast IRL offers a raw, unfiltered look at the mechanics of cultural and media power in a politically charged America. Centered on the strange story of Jimmy Kimmel’s return following terrorist threats, the show explores everything from the normalization of violence and media strategy to tech’s role in speech policing and ethical dilemmas with environmental manipulation. The panel’s sharp, sometimes abrasive honesty, and passionate debate keep the tone urgent, informed, and deeply engaged with the country’s most contentious debates.
