Tim Pool (43:35)
Yeah. Right now, specifically, I mean, there's so many elements of corruption in the Soros Inc. Story. One of the things that the RICO charge is obviously this kind of organized crime network. It's a very powerful weapon. It's a very big, heavy artillery weapon to use. And part of the issue is that. But the way the Soros machine works is that it's done through these philanthropic 501C3 fronts, and it's heavily lawyered up in order to basically use loopholes in the tax system, to use loopholes in the political influence machinery. But the Soros world really trades on national security secrets. I believe the best way to understand the Open Society Institute, the Open Society Foundations, is to look at it how we look at Harvard. Many people say that Harvard is a hedge fund with a university attached because it's a $56 billion endowment. And then you have the university, which is just a pittance compared to that in terms of what it actually requires in maintenance. It gets $9 billion in federal grants. Much of that has been trucked cut by the Trump administration. But then Harvard, their institutes and their centers, they go out and they take the actions that actually help the investments of the hedge fund, the Harvard Endowment, the Harvard Management Company. And so we saw this in the 1990s when Harvard was tasked by USAID, given actually hundreds of millions of dollars in USAID money to reorganize the economy of Russia, while the Harvard Endowment was investing in the. These Russian oil industries and steel industries. And so they were setting the policy inside Russia while profiting off of it. But these. And I do think that there needs to be an interrogation of the. The role of insider trading on national security secrets. Right now there's a lot of attention on the Nancy Pelosi stock trader side of things. Where you will invest. Members of Congress will have insider knowledge about a bill that will affect a business. And they will invest in the stock market to bet on the rise and fall of companies well before the market does well. The way Soros and many of these other big kind of oligarch sort of hedge fund slash philanthropy people work is they work with the State Department, usaid, NATO, their institutions serve as fronts for them. And then the hedge fund bets on those operations that they're facilitating. So the Open Society Institute will operate with the State Department in Mongolia to make sure that we get the rights to a copper or gold mine. But then the Soros Hedge fund will invest in the company that they are working with, the CIA and the State Department, the usaid, to get to get the rights to. They'll do the same thing in Eastern Europe, they'll do the same thing in South America. And I believe that there needs to be a full review of the Open Society foundation security clearance possession. Just this week, Tulsi Gabbard, I believe this is actually just yesterday. This is from the Wall Street Journal. Tulsi Gabbard blindsided CIA over revoking clearance of undercover officer. And this relates to, I think, something like 37 people had their security clearances cut along. The Wall Street Journal says this blindsided the CIA. Tulsi obviously is the head of the intelligence community. But how many people at the Open Society Institute have security clearances? Why has that not been reviewed? What was just, was just broke two weeks ago was actually this incredible revelation from 2016. At the very start of Russiagate in July 2016, Tulsi and the FBI declassified an annex that has been classified for years relating to intelligence from the very origins of Russiagate. And it started off essentially with a plot between Hillary Clinton and George Soros. And I'll read here from the actual annex itself, which was released by Chuck Grassley. And this related to the George Soros Eurasia center, the nonprofits Open Society foundation and Leonard Bernardo, who was the regional director for Eurasia at the Open Society foundation, as well as Jeff Goldstein there. And what they publish is this incredible section in here. Folks can see it. I'm not sure if we can control F in here, but there was a section that said that Hillary Clinton had just approved a plan from her foreign policy advisor to set Trump up to make it look like he was backed by the Russians, that the FBI would come and pour oil on it later, that CrowdStrike would do the media, that we'd come up with some reason, like our critical infrastructure is under attack. And this was an email purportedly from Leonard Bernardo, the head of the Open Society Institute foundation for Eurasia. So somehow George Soros's Open Society Institute knew that Hillary Clinton had approved this false flag plan to set up Trump, knew that the FBI was in on it, knew that CrowdStrike was in on it, to fake digital forensics and argue that Russia had hacked the DNC server. And so how did the Soros Institute know these deep details about the Hillary Clinton campaign to do this plot? Well, we know that they were meeting with the State Department at. When Hillary Clinton was the. I'm going to pull this up on screen here. When she was the Secretary of State, this was put who was in the room. So we know that Hillary Clinton met with George Soros personally at the State Department and they brought along with them the very people who turned up in the classified annex. Jeff Goldstein, the head of the, the senior policy advisor for Eurasia who was named in the FBI in the classified annex here. Does Jeffrey Epstein have a security clearance? Does Leonard Bernardo, how many other people. And I believe we need a full accounting. The same way we publish the JFK files, the MLK files, the Russiagate files. We need all USAID files, all CIA analyst memos that mention the Open Society Institute. Let's put on display for the world the full extent of US Government involvement in this. And I have one more thing to say about that. But what are you guys thoughts when I laid out.
