Matt Gaetz Withdraws As Trump AG, Russia Fires IRBM Strike, Says UK At War w/Ami Kozak

Summary

Timcast IRL – Detailed Summary

Podcast Information:

• Title: Timcast IRL
• Host/Author: Timcast Media (Hosted by Tim Pool)
• Description: Timcast IRL offers hard-hitting news and analysis on politics, culture, and current events from an independent perspective. The show features a diverse range of guests and delves into topics such as government overreach, tech censorship, and political division, fostering uncensored discussions and sharp insights into today’s most controversial issues.
• Episode: Matt Gaetz Withdraws As Trump AG, Russia Fires IRBM Strike, Says UK At War w/Ami Kozak
• Release Date: November 22, 2024

---

1. Matt Gaetz Withdraws as Trump’s Attorney General Nominee (03:19 – 14:17)

Overview: The episode kicks off with a significant political development: Representative Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination to become Attorney General under President Trump, with Pam Bondi stepping in as the new nominee.

Key Discussions:

• Behind-the-Scenes Strategy:

  • Ian Crossland (03:37): Suggests that the withdrawal was part of a premeditated plan. "It really does sound like behind the scenes that this was the plan all along."
  • Elad Eliyahu (05:00): Notes that Pam Bondi has a history with Trump, serving as Florida’s Attorney General and defending him during impeachment trials, making her a strategic choice.

• Matt Gaetz’s Resignation:

  • Ian Crossland (07:00): Praises Gaetz as a "favorite member of Congress for standing up to the machine," but speculates his resignation was inevitable due to confirmation obstacles.

• Confirmation Challenges:

  • Ami Kozak (08:07): Emphasizes concerns about corruption within the DOJ and how Pam Bondi might address these issues differently than Gaetz.
  • Tim Pool (12:04): Questions the likelihood of Gaetz returning to Congress, pondering potential Senate strategies.

• Strategic Appointments:

  • Ian Crossland (13:03): Points out that appointing Gaetz might have been a tactic to pave the way for Bondi, ensuring that her nomination would face less resistance.

Notable Quotes:

• Ian Crossland (03:53): "Matt Gaetz is being reappointed to senator when Rubio comes out."
• Ami Kozak (14:31): "If the DOJ had the goods on him, I'm sure they would have had no problem going after him for it."

2. Russia Fires IRBM Strike at Ukraine (14:18 – 50:10)

Overview: A significant military escalation is discussed as Russia reportedly launched an Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) at Ukraine, initially mistaken for an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM).

Key Discussions:

• Initial Reports and Denials:

  • Ian Crossland (45:00): Highlights the confusion between IRBMs and ICBMs, noting the West’s denial to prevent escalation. "The west saying it's not an ICBM, calm down."

• Technical Analysis:

  • Elad Eliyahu (46:42): Explains that an IRBM is similar to an ICBM but with a shorter range, capable of carrying nuclear or conventional warheads.
  • Tim Pool (47:30): Clarifies that the distinction is purely based on range, not payload capacity. "Differential of ICBM and IR is not about payload capacity."

• Strategic Implications:

  • Ian Crossland (49:27): Discusses the potential devastation of modern nuclear weapons compared to those used in WWII, emphasizing the severity of such an attack.
  • Ami Kozak (51:33): Suggests that Russia's missile strike is a show of force rather than a necessity, hinting at saber-rattling rather than actual intent to escalate to nuclear war.

• Escalation Risks:

  • Ian Crossland (54:05): Explores the broader geopolitical tensions, including NATO’s involvement and the risk of a larger-scale conflict.
  • Elad Eliyahu (57:09): Analyzes Russia’s geopolitical interests, particularly their insistence on controlling strategic regions like Crimea and the Donbass.

Notable Quotes:

• Ian Crossland (49:27): "Modern nuclear weapons have around 1,250 times the explosive potential of Little Boy and Fat Man."
• Ami Kozak (50:10): "They did not want the Americans to confuse us for an attack on them."

3. Media Misreporting: CBS and Mar-a-Lago Ambulances (50:11 – 23:03)

Overview: The discussion shifts to media inaccuracies, focusing on a CBS report that incorrectly suggested ambulances leaving Mar-a-Lago indicated something sinister, later debunked.

Key Discussions:

• Misinterpretation of Events:

  • Ian Crossland (50:11): Criticizes CBS for hyping the sighting of ambulances, which were part of a routine motorcade. "They're just part of a normal motorcade."
  • Tim Pool (55:22): Highlights the lack of context provided by media outlets, leading to public misinformation.

• Media Accountability:

  • Phil Labonte (22:28): Discusses the broader issue of legacy media seeking sensational stories, neglecting factual reporting.
  • Ami Kozak (24:13): Argues that media outlets like CBS prioritize narratives over truth to maintain their agenda.

• Impact on Public Trust:

  • Ian Crossland (23:02): Explores how such misreporting erodes public trust in media, leading to skepticism and division.

Notable Quotes:

• Ian Crossland (23:02): "This is what happens when you take people who have no idea what's going on, put them outside."
• Phil Labonte (22:30): "They're all bad, dude."

4. Joe Rogan and Dragons: The View Clash (23:04 – 38:56)

Overview: A lighter yet controversial topic emerges as "The View" accuses Joe Rogan of believing in dragons, leading to humorous debates among the hosts.

Key Discussions:

• Accusation and Reaction:

  • Ian Crossland (31:11): Shows a clip where "The View" alleges Rogan believes in dragons, leading to mockery and skepticism.
  • Tim Pool (33:12): Engages in a playful debate about the plausibility of dragons, referencing real-life animals like the bombardier beetle and pistol shrimp.

• Media and Mythology:

  • Ian Crossland (37:07): Discusses how mythical creatures often have roots in misunderstood natural phenomena.
  • Phil Labonte (33:40): Critiques the conflation of mythological beliefs with scientific facts, emphasizing the absurdity of media accusations.

• Humor and Critique of Media Narratives:

  • Ian Crossland (37:07): Uses humor to undermine the credibility of "The View’s" claims, illustrating how myths evolve from misinterpretations.

Notable Quotes:

• Ian Crossland (33:09): "He's talking about dragons as if they're biological creatures. Do you believe in dragons?"
• Tim Pool (38:31): "If there was a flying lizard that spit this hydroquinones."

5. Immigration and Border Security (50:11 – 70:56)

Overview: The hosts dive into the contentious topic of immigration, discussing policies, border security, and the impact of illegal immigration on the United States.

Key Discussions:

• Current Immigration Policies:

  • Ami Kozak (69:18): Highlights the Refugee Resettlement Program's role in relocating immigrants to predominantly Democratic states to alter political landscapes.
  • Elad Eliyahu (77:05): Discusses the economic implications of illegal immigration and the exploitation by big businesses.

• Solutions and Strategies:

  • Phil Labonte (63:50): Suggests prioritizing the deportation of violent criminals while allowing legal immigration for skilled individuals.
  • Ami Kozak (70:46): Advocates for changing the incentive structures that allow businesses to exploit illegal immigrants.

• Impact on Society and Economy:

  • Ian Crossland (65:07): Explores how immigration affects labor markets, wages, and public services, emphasizing the need for controlled and lawful immigration processes.

• Policy Recommendations:

  • Ami Kozak (70:56): Proposes targeting businesses that hire illegal immigrants to reduce their incentives to exploit them.
  • Phil Labonte (69:01): Discusses the feasibility of enforcing stricter border controls without sparking widespread civil unrest.

Notable Quotes:

• Phil Labonte (63:50): "Intelligence is different than wisdom."
• Ami Kozak (70:46): "We need to stop that incentive structure."

6. Jaguar vs. Volvo Commercials: A "Woke" Advertising Debate (70:57 – 88:50)

Overview: A spirited debate unfolds over the effectiveness and messaging of Jaguar's new commercial compared to Volvo's acclaimed advertisement, critiquing what is perceived as "woke" marketing strategies.

Key Discussions:

• Jaguar's Controversial Ad:

  • Ian Crossland (73:43): Describes Jaguar's commercial as "painfully bad" and "cringe," criticizing its futuristic and avant-garde style.
  • Ami Kozak (82:31): Questions whether the ad is intentional baiting to generate controversy and attention.

• Volvo's Acclaimed Ad:

  • Ian Crossland (87:30): Praises Volvo’s ad for its heartfelt portrayal of family and safety, contrasting it sharply with Jaguar's approach.
  • Tim Pool (83:38): Commends Volvo's focus on practical safety features over abstract artistic expression.

• Impact of "Woke" Marketing:

  • Phil Labonte (86:38): Argues that "woke" marketing often prioritizes trendy ideas over genuine connection with consumers, leading to ineffective campaigns.
  • Ami Kozak (82:31): Suggests that retro companies use "woke" advertising to capture fleeting trends, which ultimately alienates their core audience.

• Consumer Reactions and Brand Loyalty:

  • Ian Crossland (85:39): Emphasizes the importance of clear and relatable advertising, noting that Volvo’s approach resonates more effectively with consumers compared to Jaguar’s experimental style.

Notable Quotes:

• Ian Crossland (78:24): "It's so freaking cringe."
• Phil Labonte (86:45): "Seemingly a TV, it's gonna look like what people in 1950s thought a TV in the year 2000 would look like."

7. Constitutional Interpretation and Judicial Appointments (88:50 – 101:12)

Overview: A deep dive into the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, contrasting originalism with the "living document" approach, and discussing the implications of judicial appointments under President Trump.

Key Discussions:

• Originalism vs. Living Constitution:

  • Ian Crossland (94:05): Advocates for originalism, arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the Founding Fathers’ intentions. "They wanted it to be very hard."
  • Phil Labonte (99:59): Debates the practicality of enforcing originalist principles in modern governance.

• Christian Roots of the Constitution:

  • Ian Crossland (99:12): Discusses how the Constitution is informed by Christian moral teachings, asserting that rights are depicted as "unalienable by Christians."
  • Ami Kozak (100:02): Challenges the notion that early American leaders were devout Christians, pointing out figures like Thomas Jefferson’s deism.

• Judicial Appointments Under Trump:

  • Super Chats (94:33 – 101:12): Listeners discuss potential FBI Director appointments, notably Mike Rogers and Cash Patel, emphasizing the political maneuvering behind confirmations and the importance of strategic appointments to influence the judiciary.

Notable Quotes:

• Ian Crossland (94:38): "I think it's a bad thing because you're changing the makeup of the states."
• Ami Kozak (100:03): "You think there are any other Cabinet positions likely to get held up?"

8. Listener Super Chats (101:13 – 120:55)

Overview: The hosts engage with listener comments (Super Chats), addressing various topics such as FBI Director nominations, immigration policies, and critiques of political figures.

Key Discussions:

• FBI Director Nomination:

  • Ian Crossland (108:57): Critiques the nomination of Mike Rogers and advocates for Cash Patel as a more suitable candidate, highlighting Patel’s outspoken stance against perceived corruption.

• Pam Bondi’s Nomination:

  • Ami Kozak (106:16): Discusses Pam Bondi’s background and speculates on her potential influence as Attorney General, noting her previous role and connections.

• Media Influence and Bias:

  • Ian Crossland (117:17): Analyzes media portrayal of Muslim communities and the challenges platforms face in addressing hate speech while avoiding overreach.

• Constitutional and Judicial Discussions:

  • Ian Crossland (101:17): Reiterates the importance of originalist interpretation of the Constitution and critiques the "living document" approach for its susceptibility to political manipulation.

Notable Quotes:

• Ian Crossland (108:57): "Rees’ appointment might be softening, but Cash is the man."
• Ami Kozak (110:01): "He also served on his first impeachment as his defense attorney."

9. Closing Remarks and Promotions (120:56 – End)

Overview: The episode concludes with promotional segments encouraging listeners to join the Timcast community through memberships and social media, while briefly touching on last-minute topics from Super Chats.

Key Points:

• Community Engagement:

  • Tim Pool (119:53): Encourages listeners to join the Timcast Discord server for uncensored content and community interactions.

• Upcoming Topics:

  • Phil Labonte (121:05): Promotes his stand-up comedy and music, inviting listeners to follow his social media for updates.

• Final Interactions:

  • Hosts: Wrap up with light-hearted banter and reminders to engage with the show’s platforms.

Notable Quotes:

• Tim Pool (120:46): "You can find me at Twitter and Instagram at Timcast."
• Phil Labonte (121:05): "We have a podcast called Ami's House Band, Distant cousins. You could check all that stuff out."

---

Conclusion: This episode of Timcast IRL offers a robust analysis of recent political developments, media scrutiny, and cultural debates. From the strategic withdrawal of Matt Gaetz’s AG nomination to the complexities of Russia’s military actions in Ukraine, the discussion provides insightful perspectives aimed at fostering informed discourse among listeners. Additionally, the show addresses the challenges of media reliability and the impact of corporate advertising strategies, all while engaging with the audience through interactive Super Chats.

For More Information:

• Visit: Timcast.com
• Join Discord: Accessible via the Timcast website for exclusive content and community interactions.
• Follow on Social Media: Stay updated by following Tim Pool and guest contributors on Twitter and Instagram.

Transcript

[Tim Pool]

This episode is brought to you by Netflix.

[Ian Crossland]

From the co director of Shrek and.

[Ami Kozak]

The visionary behind Toy Story comes Spellbound, a magical new animated adventure starring Rachel.

[Tim Pool]

Zegler, John Lithgow, Jennifer Lewis, Nathan Lane and Titus Burgess.

[Ami Kozak]

With Javier Bardem and Nicole Kidman.

[Tim Pool]

When a powerful spell turns her parents.

[Ami Kozak]

Into monsters, Princess Elian must journey into.

[Ian Crossland]

The wild to reverse the curse before it's too late.

[Tim Pool]

Watch Spellbound only on Netflix November 22nd.

[Ian Crossland]

It is a sad day for us here at Tim Cast, but I can't say I'm too surprised. You know, I bought champagne when we heard that Matt Gates would be potentially be the nominee or potentially be the ag. He was the nominee. He has withdrawn from the running for ag. Pam Bondi has now been chosen. So it really does sound like behind the scenes that this was the plan all along. Some have speculated that Matt Gaetz was Trump's big ask, a shocking and outrageous pick. So that way when Matt Gaetz is forced to say I can't do it, they bring in Pam Bondi, who is also great. But everyone feels a little more relaxed about someone who actually has experience and isn't as shocking as Matt Gaetz. Maybe. So then we'll talk about what this means. Matt Gaetz resigned, but he is still the congressman elect for his district. So there's nothing stopping him from going back to Congress. We'll talk about that and what it means. And then we get other other big news. In the wee hours of the morning, it was reported by Ukraine that Russia fire fired an ICBM at Ukraine. If that was true, it would be the first use of an intercontinental ballistic missile in warfare. However, shortly after the west denied this and reports now say that in fact it was an intermediate ranged ballistic missile on irbm. You know, it's basically what they're saying is it was modeled off of a Russian intercontinental ballistic missile, functionally the same or similar, but it didn't have nukes on it. So you know, we'll get into that to try and understand it and then we're not just going to be serious. Tonight we have a funny story. The View says Joe Rogan believes in dragons. I kid you not. They actually did a segment where they were like, people listen to Joe Rogan and he says dragons are real and he believes dragons have existed in the times of human they're making all of this up. Once again, Joe has made fun of them. So we'll talk about that plus a bunch of other stories. We'll talk about the Jaguar ad get woke, go broke. But of course we sponsor ourselves too. Over at Cast Brew.com you can pick up, stand you'd grounds or join the Cast Brew Coffee club. We've got a bunch of different blends. Medium, light dark roast. Appalachian Nights, of course is everybody's favorite. But when you sign up for the coffee club, you actually save money because you get three, three bags and it's only 40 bucks a month. So sign up today and of course go to timcast.com and click join us. Become a member because we've got a Discord server and a massive catalog of uncensored members only content. Last night we had Milo Yiannopoulos on and it was raucous to say the least. He's a very funny guy and he's very mean, but I mean that in he enjoys being mean for the sake of humor. But everybody gets it, right, right? So check out that if you didn't see it smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Ami Kozak.

[Phil Labonte]

Thank you for having me, Tim. Good to be here.

[Ian Crossland]

Who are you? What do you do?

[Phil Labonte]

I am a comedian, musician, impressionist and content creator. And more recently over the last year have been pretty outspoken on some political issues which has gotten me into some interesting debates and conversations out there online.

[Ian Crossland]

Right on. Well, it should be fun. So glad to have you. Elad is back.

[Ami Kozak]

Hey everybody, what's up? My name is A Lot Eliyahu. I am a journalist here at Timcast. Ami, it's great to have you. What's up, Ian?

[Tim Pool]

Hey man. I'm just looking forward to putting Milo Yiannopoulos in the crystal, bro. I'm coming for you, Milo. I love you, homie. It's good to see you. Thank you for all the nice things Milo was like.

[Ian Crossland]

He said something like, I'm quite upset that Ian's not here because I like being.

[Tim Pool]

We get along, we text, we're friends offline, we both have online Personas. Milo is one of the biggest hippies I know. So I really sad that I missed that show last night. Dude, I'll be here next time, I promise you. And also, I think dragons may have been real. I'll tell you more about it during the segment.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, if you'd like, I can channel some in a Milo for show, you know.

[Ian Crossland]

Aarian, you mean dude.

[Tim Pool]

And I told, I texted Milo during the show. I was like by I don't know if you actually realize how big of a deal Balers Gate three. It's like the biggest video game maybe ever made.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, it was. Probably is a game of the year.

[Tim Pool]

Game of the year. Was it arguably game of the decade.

[Ian Crossland]

But was it literally?

[Tim Pool]

Probably.

[Phil Labonte]

I don't know.

[Tim Pool]

Larry and Studios had Divinity 2 best studio. And so it's like really impressive that they modeled like their iconic character off of Milo. Like, that's a big fucking deal.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, but I also point out too, if you watch the Boys, it's very obvious that Stormfront is Laura Loomer. Right. Like there's, if you watch the boys, I'm watching it and I'm like, it is crazy how these shows are just ripping off personalities and taking their Personas. But anyway, we'll get into all that stuff. We got Phil hanging out.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I am Philabanti. How you doing? I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band all that Remains. I'm an anti communist and a counter revolutionary. Tim, let's go.

[Ian Crossland]

From Fox News, bad news. Matt Gates withdraws as Attorney general nominee. It is clear that my confirmation was unfairly becoming a distraction to the critical work of the Trump Vance transition. Matt Gates said, well, here's the tweet he put out. He said, I had excellent meetings with senators yesterday. I appreciate their thoughtful feedback and the incredible support of so many. While the momentum was strong, it is clear that my confirmation was unfairly becoming a distraction of the critical work of the Trump Vance transition. There is no time to waste on a needlessly protracted Washington scuffle. Thus, I'll be withdrawing my name from consideration to serve as Attorney General. Trump's DOJ must be in place and ready on day one. I remain fully committed to see that Donald J. Trump is the most successful president in history. I will be forever honored that President Trump nominated me to lead the Department of Justice, and I'm certain he will save America. Now, of course, the news is that Pam Bondi is the new Trump pick for attorney general. She's a former Florida attorney general and was part of Trump's defense during his first impeachment trial. Now, many people are speculating that this was always the plan. Matt Gaetz was going to come out as the big ask. Then when they, oh, we can't get Matt, so I'll never get confirmed, they pull him back. Pam Bondi steps up, the argument being that if Trump come, no matter who Trump chose, they'd send in the big guns. So if Trump came out first and we want Pam Bondi, they'd accuse her of everything. They'd call her a Nazi, whatever they had to do. So he goes with Matt Gaetz. Now, if they say the same thing about Pam Bondi, people are going to be like, whoa, hold on, hold on, hold on. Like, is every single person going to be like this? And then it makes it look bad on their side. I can't imagine Matt Gaetz resigned from Congress without realizing senators were not going to confirm him. I don't imagine a reality where Matt's sitting there being like, there will be no contest. I'm going to get in, it'll be easy. Plus, there was talk of recess appointments. I have to assume they had this planned.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't know about planned, but I do think that it should have been or would have been something that they were aware was a possibility. As for Pam Bondi, I'm not super familiar with her, but if she has worked on Team Trump before and she's willing to do the same job that Gates was, because that, I mean, at the end of the day, as far as I'm concerned, I want to see someone do the job right? It's, it would have been cool if it was Gates because, you know, he's a friend of ours and all that, but at the same time, just so long as it's someone that will go after the people that have broken the law and investigate people that are suspected of breaking the law, if she's willing to do that, it doesn't really matter. But I want someone that's a bulldog, someone that's actually going to go, go hard and actually use the Department of Justice to hopefully root out the massive, massive amounts of corruption in the United States federal government. Because it's clear that there is a huge amount of corruption. I mean, all of the investigations into Trump, every last one of them is suspect. So everything.

[Ian Crossland]

And Matt Gaetz.

[Elad Eliyahu]

What?

[Ian Crossland]

And Matt Gates.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Matt Gaetz, yeah, fair enough. You know, so it's clear that the bureaucracy and the former DOJ used, you know, abuse their power, or at least it's, it's highly likely, but I won't get into definitive terms, but it's highly likely. And it looks like the DOJ abused the hell out of their power and really have done a terrible disservice to the American people. Because your average person that pays attention to the inner world or the day to day stuff coming out of Washington, they're all looking at the stuff. They all look at the stuff that Trump was accused of and they're like, I'm not so sure that, you know, look, they went after Trump, but they didn't go after Biden and they didn't they decided not to prosecute Clinton, but they're gonna go after Trump. And they raided Mar A Lago. And you know, all of these things that the DOJ did the entire time that Biden was president and all of these things that were going on while Trump was president, all of the Steele dossier, the, you know, all of the Russiagate stuff, all that stuff, the average person has really lost faith in this justice system.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Ami Kozak]

So the five senators who I'm seeing floated that allegedly. I can't find it from an official account. It's only these parody accounts. Let's take this with a grain of salt. But the likely people would have been Susan Collins, the senator from Maine, who would have voted against Matt Gates, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska. They're saying, they're saying Mitch McConnell and then I'm not very familiar with John Curtis from Utah. Matt Gaetz made a lot of enemies when he was in Congress, when he tried to overthrow the majority leader. McCarthy tried to. Or, well, when he was, when he successfully overthrew McCarthy. And he made a lot of political.

[Phil Labonte]

Enemies, as you say, Trump's name instead of McCarthy, when they were casting, at.

[Ami Kozak]

Least at one point. And there's a lot of inside baseball going on about the timing of the resignation and all of this going down. Allegedly, Matt gaetz originally asked McCarthy to sweep the House investigation into his. There's some ethics complaint against Mat allegedly sleeping with a 17 year old that he wanted McCarthy to sweep under the rug. McCarthy refused. Matt Gaetz tried to overthrow him, upset the establishment, among other things. They've been enemies ever since. And this is some of the downstream effects we're seeing from there.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, are you familiar with like Scott Adams take on Trump's ab testing strategy? He used to talk about when he was. Ever since he even started run. Explain it in running in 2015. If you listen to Scott Adams, who wrote like the Dilber comic strips and has been calling Trump's basic like heroes arc story since the very beginning. He said in 2015, when everyone thought it was a laughing stock, that he would be running, that he would be winning. And he called Trump's victory all through. And he calls this the big third act. But his whole thing is that Trump has always had this strategy where people think he's just being a clown and being impulsive, but it's actually very calculated in that he'll say something that will be much more provocative or make choices that are provocative and everyone will react to it. And then when he walks it back to the actual position, he would. Was going to take to begin with. It seems like a reasonable compromise. And if he were to come out first with the appointment he has now, people would have brought out the guns. But in doing so, it's. It's like throwing out the a. See where people react, which is Gates and then pulling it back and. And nominating her. So it's been a pattern all along that is much more calculated than I think people realize.

[Ian Crossland]

She's famous for the big ask.

[Tim Pool]

That's it. The big ask.

[Ian Crossland]

Yep.

[Phil Labonte]

I make deals. I make so many deals.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I mean, if again, I don't know that there was a plan in it. If Trump was familiar with her anyways.

[Ian Crossland]

How could there not be?

[Tim Pool]

Well, I think.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, like I said, I think that the situation was like he probably had a backup because he. Because everyone does know that Matt Gaetz is a firebrand, but I don't know that it was his intent.

[Ian Crossland]

Matt Gaetz coming out and being like, we couldn't get the vote, so I have to withdraw. And I'm like, that doesn't seem to make sense. Yeah.

[Ami Kozak]

Because there was also rumors though that the House was going to come out with the House Ethics committees. A couple of. He ended up resigning.

[Ian Crossland]

So I think that's nonsense. Of course, they leaked these things no matter what.

[Ami Kozak]

Sure. And it did actually eventually get leaked to the New York Times.

[Ian Crossland]

So the report's been leaked.

[Ami Kozak]

Not the full report, but they said there was a hacker who fed part of it.

[Ian Crossland]

But now. And now some files have already been released showing his like Venmo transactions. Matt Gaetz leaving. This is a talking point from Democrats. Oh, he's leaving. So they can't do it. What do you mean they can't do it? They're voting. They want to. They tried to have a vote to release it anyway and it's going to. It would come up in the Senate hearings for confirmation either way. So I don't think that makes any sense.

[Ami Kozak]

I think the case closes once he resigns from Congress.

[Ian Crossland]

And they still said they were going to vote to release it. So what are they going to do?

[Tim Pool]

So this is generally. Gates thought if there are four Republican senators, they were going to vote no.

[Ian Crossland]

3.

[Tim Pool]

3. Then there's no way he could have been confirmed because the other side would.

[Ami Kozak]

Have had the majority, wasn't getting any from Democrats.

[Tim Pool]

And there's no way to re vote or revoke.

[Ian Crossland]

There is a recess appointment.

[Ami Kozak]

Well, they didn't vote at all, by the way, if.

[Ian Crossland]

Right. They went and talked. He claims he went and talked to senators too. Many of them, I think it was like four were like, we're not going to do it. And he's like, well, that's it, you can't do it. And so according to numerous reports, and I don't trust any of these people, I think it was Politico. I'm not sure they said that. A source familiar with what happened said Trump told them, look, you don't have the votes. That's not going to work. I don't buy it. Because as soon as they said Matt Gaetz, everyone said it's going to have to be a Reese's appointment. There's no way Donald Trump and Matt Gaetz and I know Matt and he's brilliant, he's a super smart guy. He saw this coming. So my only assumption is he goes back to Congress, maybe gets appointed to senator when Rubio comes out. But they had to have seen this coming. I'm a huge fan of Matt Gaetz. I've told him this to his face. He's been on the show favorite member of Congress for standing up to the machine, standing up to Kevin McCarthy. You got Mike Lawler out of New York saying he risked our majority by siding with Democrats. I'm like, no, he siding with the people who are fed up with your whole corrupt Congress that cuts deals behind to spend trillions of dollars on garbage. And we're proud of Matt Gaetz for having done that. That being said, my opinion is that he had a plan the whole time.

[Ami Kozak]

I will say if the DOJ had the goods on him, I'm sure they would have wouldn't have had any problem going after him for it. So there is something there with them not coming out. And again, it doesn't need to reach the threshold of being illegal to have done something that is bad or wrong.

[Tim Pool]

But does Rubio appoint his successor now?

[Ami Kozak]

I think no. DeSantis does.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, Ron DeSantis. He could just be like Gates. You're the guy.

[Ami Kozak]

He would never though because DeSantis ran against Trump in the primary and then Gates backed trump hard and DeSantis probably took that personally.

[Tim Pool]

Maybe. But I think DeSantis does support the Republican agenda in general and Gates is a good choice for senator. But what else could Gates do like in the Trump administration? Aren't there other roles in the Trump administration? He could get Gates.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Gates resigned now. Right. For during this Congress when the net he was elected for the next Congress so he could take his seat back. Because he was elected in January. He resigned for the. I think it's the 118th Congress. And when the 119th Congress goes in to take their seats, he can take that seat because he didn't resign saying, I'll never be in Congress again. He said, I'm resigning from the 118th Congress.

[Ami Kozak]

I think in worst case, there would be a special election and he'd definitely win the seed. I'm not sure why.

[Phil Labonte]

Go ahead.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The point.

[Ian Crossland]

He doesn't need a special election. He's the congressman elect for that district. That means come January 3rd, he's just in.

[Phil Labonte]

Was this more I was reading to Trump or vice versa? Why go through this roundabout process from his perspective, favorite of Trump? Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Part of the plan, part of the mission. You know, maybe he's senator. Yeah. You guys don't think that Rubio would do that?

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't know if Rubio. I mean, this would do that. I don't.

[Tim Pool]

I think he would. I don't see who else he would appoint. Well, I don't know.

[Ami Kozak]

The thing is that the Democrats have no credibility when it comes to any of these alleged sexual assault cases, especially when there isn't any criminal complaints. They did same thing to Kavanaugh. And I think the Republicans are. I think it's an important thing because they're going to come with similar allegations against. Well, they're going to other cabinets. Like, let's just. Which is the next guy?

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, Republicans can just say, look, this is standard procedure.

[Ian Crossland]

Right?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Like, Republicans can actually say that Hegsev, Kavanaugh, Gates. I mean, you can go down the list of at least. Probably, if I, If I sat and thought about it, we could come up with at least five different people that aren't. That are Republicans, and they've all been accused of some kind of sexual misconduct. Right? Like, that's. That's Donald Trump. You know, that's. That is normal. And I think that because there have been no, uh, there's been no arrests, investigations have gone nowhere. You know, with. With a massive majority, significant majority of these accusations, you can safely say, look, you know, that's just what the Democrats do. I think that it's more likely or it's more. The more important factor is what is Gates relationship with. With DeSantis, you know, because if DeSantis does like him and they get along, then it's, you know, it might be more. It might be more likely, but I don't know.

[Ami Kozak]

But there are White House positions that you could get appointed to, and you don't need to be confirmed to by the Senate. There's blood, bad blood between them from.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The primary, I believe DeSantis and Gates.

[Ami Kozak]

DeSantis and Gates, yeah.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Why?

[Ami Kozak]

Because Gates was a hardcore Trump backer and DeSantis thought he had a chance against.

[Phil Labonte]

But in a post Trump victory world, a lot of stuff gets washed under the bridge. Look at little Marco now next to Donald Trump and Lion Ted. Little Mark always called him, and now he's secretary.

[Ami Kozak]

I still think Trump's holding. If you guys like Trump is holding a grudge.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Trump does not hold DeSantis. Trump doesn't hold grudges.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, well, Trump doesn't. Trump. Famous Trump doesn't. And I think it's a problem. Trump, Trump, he's saying of Micah and Joe showing up to Mar A Lago, he's like, well, you know, I'll give people extra chances. He says, I'll give them 1, 2, 3, but I won't do 4.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Trump is so likely to not hold a grudge that even Cenk Uygur had made a tweet. You know, one of the good things about Trump is that he doesn't hold grudges. Like, it's so.

[Phil Labonte]

You will not speak over me.

[Ian Crossland]

It's such a.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's such a thing with Trump that, like, even people that are considered far left have to acknowledge. Yeah, he doesn't hold grudges as long.

[Phil Labonte]

As they're definitely not going to hold a grudge to.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Against. Against any.

[Ami Kozak]

You think there's any other Cabinet?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Of course. Yeah. Pardon me?

[Ami Kozak]

Do you think there's any other cabinet position that's likely to get held up here?

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think that they're going to go. I think the two that are most likely going to see the most resistance is Tulsi for DNI and I think Bobby Kennedy. Kennedy, yeah.

[Ami Kozak]

Because they're Democrats.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Pardon me.

[Ami Kozak]

Because they're a former Democrats. No, I think it would be difficult for Republicans to vote to confirm.

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. I think that. I think it's.

[Phil Labonte]

Kennedy is a different. I think it's because it's not a political thing. It's more about his unique kind of.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, well, Kennedy, Kennedy. It's because of his views. Kennedy, it's because of his views. And Tulsi Gabbard, it's because of her. Her outlook on the. The intelligence community overall.

[Ami Kozak]

We'll keep our eyes on those.

[Phil Labonte]

The thing that's difficult is that the, you know, you, Trump, when he said it on Rogan, that when he first got in, he's still surrounded by insiders and establishment people, and it was very hard for him to sift through that. And now he has sort of the authority to go outside that. But you still need this confirmation process. So it's this fine line of getting confirmed by people who are establishment while bringing people in who are from the outside.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's normal for a couple, like one or two to not make it.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Elad Eliyahu]

But at some point, like, they do say, look, the president gets to select his cabinet. And they. They are who? The people that the president. Well, the thing is the cat. It's with the consent of the Senate. But the Senate, like the Senate is generally considered. It's like, normally they're like, well, we may not like him, but the president gets to make his cabinet full of people that he likes. And it would be. It would be unprecedented if they were like four people that, if that were.

[Tim Pool]

To happen in the Senate, didn't confirm anybody and then Trump gets into office, what happens?

[Elad Eliyahu]

They have to. The positions have to be filled.

[Tim Pool]

By who?

[Ami Kozak]

No, I mean, it'd be recess appointments until they eventually.

[Ian Crossland]

During Trump's first administration, famously, many of these positions went unfilled because they would not. They were obstructing Trump every step of the way.

[Ami Kozak]

There would be acting. There would be like an acting ag and an acting secretary appointed by Trump. Appointed by Trump for a limited amount of time or something. And they don't have.

[Tim Pool]

Gates could be the acting agent.

[Ami Kozak]

They don't have all of the privileges of the. True.

[Ian Crossland]

This was the point. They were talking about racist appointments. Mike Johnson would call for an adjournment. Senate would say no. Trump would say, you're here by adjourned. And then he can resuspoint all of these people. But if you're. Let's. Let's jump to this next story from Lone Star Live. Trump Advisor calls CBS producer effing dummy after false alarm about ambulances leaving Mar? A Lago. This story is fascinating because earlier today, I don't know if you guys saw the breaking news. Two ambulances were seen leaving Mar A Lago surrounded by Secret Service. Everybody was losing their minds. This was it. Some people on Blue sky were actually posting these liberals that Trump had passed on. Well, as it turns out, this story is absolutely hilarious. What actually happened is these are part of a normal motorcade. They were not, as we know, in use. According to reports, journalists have formed an unofficial press pool swarming outside of Mar A Lago. So a press pool for us, I don't know is a pool report is. And I may be wrong about this because I think their whole practice is stupid. But there will be. Say there's an official government event. They'll say, we're only gonna have a pool reporter. It's one person who goes in and they film or whatever. And then that is relayed to all the agencies so they can all use it. Something like that. So they've created an unofficial pool where they're just hanging out outside of Mar a Lago waiting for news. And because they're stupid and don't fact check, when they saw ambulances leave, they reported as this big breaking story when literally nothing was happening, causing a panic and then getting roasted. Steven Chung, adviser to Trump, dismissed concerns about ambulances, saying the CBS producer overreacted. Pray for Trump. Pray for President Trump. Again, trending on X 3:30pm Central says 4:30 after a reporter tweeted a tip he said he received from a CBS producer about several ambulances and Secret Service vehicles seen entering and leaving Trump's Mar A Lago residence in Florida. What really happened? J.D. vance showed up. That's it. The press was has set up a fake unofficial pool because they want to feel important about themselves. In this case, some idiot at CBS overreacted and set off the fire alarm for no reason, thinking they weren't going to get the scoop of a lifetime. Effing dummy.

[Tim Pool]

So CBS is the new cnn.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, they're all bad, dude.

[Tim Pool]

They're all anti Trump network and eventually going to get divested in the next four years if they keep acting like this.

[Ian Crossland]

But it's not so much that they're being anti Trump, it's that they don't do anything substantial in terms of reporting. Everybody assumes these reporters must be telling the truth or I should say the default libs do. Meanwhile, the rest of us are like, I don't believe what you're saying. You got to show me a video and prove it. And so this is what happens when you take people who have no idea what's going on, put them outside. This is a perfect example of what would trigger a gel man amnesia effect. Even in us.

[Ami Kozak]

Even in us.

[Ian Crossland]

Because what do you do, right? You look at this story and you're like, oh, wow, that's crazy. Ambulances were leaving. Then it turns out, according to officials, the ambulances are a normal part of the motorcade. It's nothing special. It's like they're there for a variety of reasons, whatever it may be, emergencies maybe. And you're like, oh, but I didn't know that.

[Phil Labonte]

That's where Trump sleeps in. The next no one sees him.

[Ian Crossland]

The next time the CBS reporter reports something, taking a nap the next time the C Best reporter reports something, we're going to say, oh, wow, look at that. See, the CBS guy is going to say, oh, I just saw a giraffe leaving the property. We're going to go, wow, a giraffe. Instead of saying, this guy's full of it and he's probably lying or wrong. It wasn't a giraffe, it was a zebra.

[Tim Pool]

I'm a little more on guard against CBS now. I know that CNN has been apt to say weird things. MSNBC even. I don't know about Fox News lately. But CBS seems like they're more neutral. I guess that's. They're all owned by, I don't say the same people, but a lot of the same companies, I think own these media networks. I should check out who owns cbs. I'll do that.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, there's been a big humbling effect on a lot of the, on the legacy media outlets. So they're just kind of looking for anything they could point to, to like, you know, tip the narrative somewhere else where, like, things are not going well.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I mean, anything, anything.

[Phil Labonte]

So they're craving crumbs of like, oh, something wrong.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Anything that's like, I mean, look, if it were true, it would be a big story.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So the guy got. Got out over his skis. And that's fairly normal with, you know, with reporters. Like, if they, if they see something, they're just like, oh, you know, I want to go, and blah, blah, blah. Especially if it's, you know, if it's Donald Trump, if, because if something had happened, you know, the guy that breaks the news, like, look at me, I broke the news. I got, you know, But I mean, with, with X and stuff the way that it is, like if you report something and people can confirm that your reporting was right. And that's really all that happened is he reported this happened. You know, ambulances left with a bunch of Secret Service cars around it and then that picked up on X and then blah, blah, blah. Now what went on in Blue sky, that's a whole different thing. But the stuff that I, that I was seeing on X was all just people reporting what he reported. Ambulance. Two ambulances and multiple cars of Secret Service. Two ambulances and multiple cars of Secret Service. There's multiple accounts that were reporting that the fact that people on Blue sky took it and did a whole lot of, of the, what's it called, fan fiction stuff they do, you know.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, you know, jumping to conclusions.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Not just, no, not just jumping to conclusions. They want bad things to happen. So, you know, over at Blue sky, they're going to be like, man, wouldn't it be great if Donald Trump died? Wouldn't it be great if this happened? Wouldn't it be great if he, you know, he broke him, broke his leg or anything bad that can happen to Donald Trump, Blue sky is going to be throwing a party about. So, I mean, like I said, if you, when you were on ERA over here on X, like, it was fairly accurate reporting these, you know, it was, it was every, like I said, everything was a couple ambulances and a bunch of, a bunch of Secret Service. I didn't see Blue sky because I don't have a Blue sky account and I think I might have to make one just to go and collect some LOLs. But, but yeah, it doesn't surprise me that the, that the factual stuff went around. And it also doesn't surprise me that the people, like, you know, spun it into something, especially on Blue sky, man, they want, they really want him to be a bad guy. You know, they, they believe that he is the worst thing ever. I mean, there's even still some of the far left that are on X that are, you know, consistently saying things like, oh, look, you guys are going to regret it. There are, there are people that are, there's, there's a couple specific accounts that are already saying things like, look, you guys asked for this, you guys asked for this, you asked for this. And it's like, well, yeah, literally, we know, like, what are you saying? What are you. They're implying that there's terrible things happening. It's like the man hasn't even been inaugurated yet. Like, this, this is all, like, this is all just like setting up stuff. And yes, everyone knows that, like, most people in the country are comfortable with, well, that's like supporting people and stuff.

[Ian Crossland]

The funniest thing about Trump winning is you get, what was it Joe Walsh saying? Attorney General Matt Gaetz. That's what you voted for when you voted for Donald Trump. Congratulations. And literally all of us are like, yes.

[Phil Labonte]

As if. It's like, I gotcha.

[Ian Crossland]

Like, literally, we did. We actually are very happy with that choice. It's a bummer to see that he won't be. But, yeah, that we, we did vote for it. They don't seem to understand that we like Trump.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Like, we like Matt Gaetz.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

They're like, you must think the same way as me. So you are, you, this is what's happening now. And we're like, oh, thank heavens that's always here's. The other thing too about like Trump is going to use the military to deport people. When the, when the, when the migrants were shipped to, sent to Martha's Vineyard, they called the National Guard to round them up and bring them to a dorm housing at a military base.

[Tim Pool]

You mean a camp?

[Ian Crossland]

That's right. I'm being polite, but the National Guard rounded up these legal asylees.

[Tim Pool]

Biden's America.

[Ian Crossland]

That's right. And that's Biden's America.

[Ami Kozak]

And unfortunately it'll be other Republicans that block Trump from accomplishing things like this. We kind of, I don't know if we've mentioned this before, but Rand Paul broke with Trump and actually I think he came out against using the military for mass deportations, calling it a huge mistake. If Rand Paul thinks that they're going to be many other senators.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't know about many other Rand Paul's. Remember Rand Paul is very libertarian and.

[Ami Kozak]

So we could start with Murkowski, we could start with Susan Collins.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They're barely Republicans. They're the people that are. I mean, I think Collins is independent now, isn't she?

[Ami Kozak]

I think she's still a Republican.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Okay.

[Ami Kozak]

But the argument would be that she's the only one as a republic who could win in that area. As a Republican, I think it's from Maine for sure.

[Phil Labonte]

Sure has the unique civil liberties standpoint.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, that's the thing. It's like Rand Paul is going to do the libertarian stuff, but still most of the, and I genuinely believe this, most of the people that are, that are most of the Republicans, like they see what, you know, what happened on November 5 with the election. They know that Donald Trump has a mandate and they also know that if they are pushing back against the president too much and they're up for election, I mean senators are every six years. So there's some time in between it. But like they know that the Republicans want to get stuff done. There are things that need to happen and it's good for the country. Just like all, I'm sure you're aware of the, or maybe you're aware of the, one of the rules changes that they want to do. So that way you can get amendments back in to bills that are brought to the Senate. Right now everything is an up or down vote on a huge bill, whatever it is.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Like that's a bad thing. You have to be able to put amendments into bills and change stuff around. So that way you can take stuff out as well as put stuff in. And that gives power to the Senate, these things are important. And the Senate, if the Senate has that power, they can actually help to do good things. And Donald Trump is a deal maker. So if he gets what he wants and the senators can put amendments in and they get what they want, then you could see actual progress being made with some serious cutbacks on the, in the bureaucracy. And that's, that's something that the Republicans have been giving lip service to for ages. And honestly, it would be a good thing for America. So I don't, I don't know that there's going to be a lot of people that are going to fight Trump just to fight him. And when it comes to, you know, specifically like using the military for, for to help get, you know, deport people and stuff, that kind of stuff is something that Rand Paul would always be like, nah, man, nah.

[Tim Pool]

I've got stuff. To cap it off of CBS, owned by, it would merge with Viacom in 2019. Then it mer Viacom. CBS merged with Paramount Pictures in 2022 and it's owned now by a company called National Amusements, which is owned by a guy named Sumner Redstone.

[Elad Eliyahu]

National.

[Ian Crossland]

At some point there's going to be one media company called News. Yeah, dude.

[Tim Pool]

Sumner Redstone's daughter, Shari Redstone is the chair.

[Ami Kozak]

There's already News Corp.

[Ian Crossland]

Right?

[Ami Kozak]

It's News.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. It's not as big. Let's jump to this next story. Speaking of fake news, Joe Rogan mocks the View after co host accused him of believing in dragons. Okay, the first thing I want to do is show you the clip from these loot. I'm almost like, you know, if I was going to show you a bunch of clucking hands we can put on Chicken City. But I'll give you the View instead as they disparage Joe Rogan. People want us divided. And they aren't just here in this country. They're foreign. Foreign adversaries who are infiltrating our social media because it is prudent for us to stay that way.

[Ami Kozak]

But when you see something that really.

[Ian Crossland]

Pisses you off, you should triple check that one. Yeah, but I think that that's why people like our show because they know that we are checked by ABC News, everybody. Yeah. I mean, if we're wrong, we have, you know, the legal note here, that.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Is a new development.

[Ian Crossland]

Legal. We went from Walter Cronkite basically to this guy Joe Rogan, who believes in dragons. I checked it. He believes in dragons. He believes in dragons. Did you triple force back? Yes, I did. And he also Thinks that dragons, like, I guess, like dinosaur type, type of animals roam the earth when people did. So this is the type of really, really bad information that's going out there. Isn't it funny that she just said, we have legal disclaimers and we're checked by ABC News. Also, Joe Rogan believes in dragons. And so Joe Rogan changed his Twitter bio to Dragon Believer. And that's my new official X description. Rogan said changing his bio to Dragon Believer, he posted the clip. Where do they.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, I want to know what he said about dragons.

[Ami Kozak]

That.

[Ian Crossland]

He probably didn't say anything.

[Tim Pool]

There's like, terror.

[Phil Labonte]

No, there's terrible dragons, probably.

[Ian Crossland]

They probably found one of those meme clips where it's. People will edit podcasts to make jokes and, you know, was it Joy?

[Phil Labonte]

It was Pink trip or something.

[Ian Crossland]

They believe. Yeah. And they believe it and they go, wow, he believes in dragons.

[Phil Labonte]

Or he was talking about, like, animals. They're like, these are, like, legit. It's crazy.

[Ian Crossland]

Like, or he was smoking weed and it was called, like, they're just really. It's a. It's. It's a strain of weed called Dragons. With humans, it's like, oh, didn't you.

[Ami Kozak]

Know chickens are still considered dragons Men. And then he's just like, oh, yeah, totally. I believe that. There we go.

[Ian Crossland]

They're like little dinosaurs.

[Ami Kozak]

Little dinosaurs.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Maybe look that up.

[Phil Labonte]

The whole tone of these shows, it's amazing because they spend most of their time post election asking themselves what's wrong with the country? I don't understand what's wrong with everybody and not what's wrong with us.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, you know, I mean, that's something that I've said a bunch of times. Like, they hate America. Like, we were talking on PCC today. We were talking about Ellen DeGeneres and her wife are leaving. And it's like, well, you know, we. They hate America. They hate the fact that Donald Trump was elected by a majority of the American voting population and by, you know, the electoral college.

[Phil Labonte]

And they just look at elitism, a disdain for those. That's why they keep saying, listen, college educated women voted for Kamala.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I mean, so I have.

[Phil Labonte]

That's the facts. And I'm like, well, maybe college doesn't educate you.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That's true. Sort of. But it's not just. It is elitism, but there's also, like, there's people that don't feel any connection to, like, the United States. People that tend to be in, in, like, that tend to live in cities. Like, you can live in London or you could live in Paris or you could live in New York, or you could live in la, or you could live in, you know, any number of cities in the west. And it mostly feels the same. You'll get most of the same stuff. Like you'll get a little bit different food maybe, but otherwise it's the same thing. But if you live in the woods or in the, in like outside of the major cities, it's real different. Like if you live in the desert, if you live outside of Phoenix in the desert, it's totally different to living in New England outside of the city. So like that kind of stuff makes a difference. And people that are cosmopolitan like that, they're just like, whatever. It's all the same to me. I live in a city and I live in the city in the US or London or whatever. And it's like it's all the same. They don't, they don't have any connection to where they're from.

[Tim Pool]

I'm doing some fact checking on Rogan's beliefs on dragons. Joe Rogan's dragon believes. This is from a episode of his podcast with Adrien Lapoluchi, if you want to look into it. According to the snippets, he talked about ancient cultures like the Chinese, Japanese, ancient European cultures. They suggested dragons might have been real flying lizards or like flying crocodiles. He said he doesn't necessarily. He's not sold on the fire breathing aspect, but is convinced that there were large reptilian creatures that were referred to as dragons. Now I'll to go a step further and suggest it is possible that they had like flammable saliva and maybe it was like they clicked something in the back of their throat and could like make a spark.

[Ian Crossland]

This dragon believes.

[Phil Labonte]

Wait till Joey Behar comes after you. Like now you have this guy Tim.

[Ian Crossland]

Pull maybe saliva falling. As you know, I bet there probably were stuff like this. And then to turn that into. He believes that dragon suggested that these.

[Tim Pool]

Dragons might have been real. Might, might have been kimono.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Dragons are real. Like there's literal dragon, there are dragon there. There are giant lizards that are bad.

[Tim Pool]

You know, birds are like flying lizards. I mean at some point we had dinosaurs.

[Ian Crossland]

They were.

[Ami Kozak]

Don't prove Mika and Joe ended up making up with Donald Trump. Do you think there's any potential for the View to also make up with 100%?

[Tim Pool]

Trump does what?

[Phil Labonte]

He's a comedian. I could totally see her going on the show and like. But I don't know. At this point it's too far gone.

[Ian Crossland]

It's actually a real betrayal of sort.

[Phil Labonte]

Of the comedians understanding of things. Like she comes from that world, we forget because she's been on the show so long.

[Ian Crossland]

Joe's point. Joe's point is actually really, really simple. You go back 2,000 years or whatever and you've got a village of 100 people. And, you know, let's just say it's, I don't know, Rome. And what's a Rome? What's an old Latin name? I don't know, like Lucius or something. Is that Latin? There you go. And he's like, in Latin, I'm gonna go travel to the next town over to see if they've got metal of some sort. And as he's walking, he's like, boop, boop, boop. And he sees a big lizard and it's like a.

[Phil Labonte]

It's a.

[Ian Crossland]

It's huge. It's like, you know, probably a meter. And then he goes back, he's like, I swear it was as big as this, you know, it was massive. And then some guy was like, did you hear what Lucy said? There was a lizard. It was like 6ft tall.

[Tim Pool]

Oh yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And then some guy's like, I hear there's a six foot tall lizard walking around. And then someone's like, yeah. And it was spitting and screaming. Spitting, wow. Yeah. Spitting fire, they say. And he didn't mean literal fire. But my point is, you know, when you hear these stories about monsters, like the story of this, like, where does cyclops come from? They found an elephant skull and the, the nose socket or whatever looks one. Yeah. They thought it was a cyclops head. And so then they draw pictures.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

So you go back far enough and someone's gonna be like, I fought a giant beast. It was seven feet tall. Or they wouldn't say feet or whatever. And it was like a black bear, you know.

[Tim Pool]

And then Minotaur was like actually just a bull.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, it was a bull. A bullet stood up and like, you know, trampled somebody.

[Ami Kozak]

Did you see Richard pull into Maze?

[Phil Labonte]

The conversation between Richard Dawkins and Jordan Peterson, like, do you actually believe in dragons or not? You talk about dragons as if they're biological creatures. Do you believe in dragons?

[Ian Crossland]

What a Jord Peterson? Z.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, he, he went to the mythological. He was like, take, you know, the most terrifying things you can think of. You know, it's like, well, fire and wings and teeth that can soar through the heavens, you know, and destroy you. You've had your own dragons in your life, you know, to, to Richard, but he went to The. They were talking cross purposes.

[Ian Crossland]

And Jordan Peterson did say that you're a ch. Chimpanzee full of snakes.

[Tim Pool]

I wouldn't be surprised if there was glandular. Literally like glandular fire making.

[Ian Crossland]

I. I do not believe that.

[Tim Pool]

I don't think there would be any foss fossil records of the glands. So I don't know. All that stuff would decompose. Maybe stuff literally could spit flammable fluid.

[Phil Labonte]

More disturbingly is like they're conflating the idea and they're so threatened by. They're presenting it as if it's this threat that people have conversations.

[Ami Kozak]

Okay.

[Phil Labonte]

Talk loosely about things because. And the fact that they're like, we have to be the controlled, you know, center of what is true and not true. We are the ones who tell you. And the authority. This. This appeal in this clip that you could see this sort of elitism to. They're so threatened by the popularity of conversation.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't want to hear anyone on the View telling me that they're gonna judge Joe Rogan because he believes in dragons, because I bet at least one of them believes in astrology or that.

[Ian Crossland]

Men can get pregnant.

[Elad Eliyahu]

There you go.

[Ian Crossland]

But wouldn't it be funny if just like a couple thousand years ago, there's some, like, Chinese dude and he was, like, walking between towns and then there's like. I don't know where the Komodo dragons are native to, but let's just say there's like a big lizard somewhere.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And it runs out of the bush after having just tried to eat a piece of flaming refuse because a lightning strike happened, and so it runs up and just barfs and this ball of fire comes out.

[Tim Pool]

There are. But the bombardier beetle is a real animal that spits flammable liquid called hydroquinones.

[Ian Crossland]

It's not flammable.

[Elad Eliyahu]

This says boiling.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. It's a toxic boiling substance, and it doesn't spit.

[Tim Pool]

Well, there you go. The chemicals mix in the air and undergo the exothermic heat release and chemical reaction.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I was literally just looking at, like, in a bombardier beard.

[Tim Pool]

Boiling hot. Yeah. Irritating boiling hot fluids. So if there was a. If there was a flying lizard that spit this hydroquinones.

[Ian Crossland]

What's that? What's that shrimp that can snap so hard, it creates a plasma blast.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah. What is it?

[Ian Crossland]

What is it? Pistol shrimp? Yeah, it's. It's. It, like, it snaps its little claw so fast, it creates a vacuum which creates a burst of light.

[Phil Labonte]

Like street fighter shrimp.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, it's like a hadouken plasma. Yeah. That's right.

[Phil Labonte]

You sent us down a rabbit hole.

[Ian Crossland]

Dangerous shrimp. But this is, this is the nature of the media. They don't like Joe Rogan and they sit here telling how we tell the truth. Meanwhile, they just spit lies all day to the point where they have to have legal disclaimers. When she's like, we have a legal notice here, the human legal notice. I'm like, that's not a good thing to have to have. Did you see this? Indicative of how many lies you have just released.

[Tim Pool]

Another one.

[Ian Crossland]

Did another one.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. Today I disclaimer.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, another.

[Tim Pool]

Another one.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't think that it was about.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, it was Heg, Seth.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Oh, Fox News. They're just like, hey, you'll be hearing from our lawyers.

[Phil Labonte]

Sunny doesn't seem to be working whatever they keep doing because judging by the way the cultural tides have turned, I.

[Ami Kozak]

Think, well, I think they're going to go for Pete Hex, by the way.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They're only interested in getting there after the awfuls. They're after the awful. The awful viewership, just affluent white ladies.

[Phil Labonte]

That are siloing itself off more and more and more. The more they double down on it. So just it doesn't seem to be.

[Elad Eliyahu]

But I don't think that it matters. I don't think that, like, obviously they don't, they don't want to, you know, get sued. But beyond, like, legal ramifications, they don't have to say anything. That's true.

[Ami Kozak]

Well, they don't want to get Alex Jones door or Fox News.

[Ian Crossland]

Here's, here's, here's, here's the video. This is from this From Today at 1pm Sonny Hostin has to read another correction on air for false claims she made against Matt Gaetz and Pete Hegseth. Here you go.

[Ami Kozak]

I have a legal note.

[Ian Crossland]

Matt Gaetz has long denied all allegations and has not been charged with any crime. Gates previously dismissed allegations that he paid for sex, saying that, quote, someone is trying to recategorize my generosity to ex girlfriends as something more untoward. Another legal note, Pete Hegseth's lawyer said he paid the woman in 2023 to.

[Ami Kozak]

Head off the threat of a baseless lawsuit.

[Ian Crossland]

He has denied any wrongdoing. Just call the show Legal Note from now on. It is, I just gotta point this out. We don't have to do this. Like, we don't have to have a legal notice over the fake things that we say on this show because we don't say fake things.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. In fact, if a fake thing gets said on the show, we'll actually shut the show down for the integrity of the show or correct it in real time. But there have been instances where we've actually terminated the process because of integrity is more important than we have never.

[Ian Crossland]

Shut the show down for being wrong.

[Tim Pool]

Well, making baseless claims. I think I've done that once when you were like, it's over.

[Ian Crossland]

I see what you're saying this.

[Tim Pool]

Okay, I'm looking a little bit more at.

[Ami Kozak]

They're trying to avoid a lawsuit here and they're covering their bases. Obviously it's horrible to say wrong things about political people and not give their full comments and statements. But they saw what happened to Alex Jones and Sandy Hooks. They're seeing what's happening with Dominion and Fox News. I think there's another polling company that's also suing Fox News. So they don't want a multimillion dollar lawsuit from these very litigious. You know, I'm sure Matt Gaetz and Pete Hetseth have some of the greatest lawyers around. So.

[Ian Crossland]

So we have a correction. Official lucid traveler says it's the mantis shrimp. And if a human had the arm strength relative to our size, we could launch a baseball into orbit from a standing position. It's cool.

[Ami Kozak]

You're gonna get sued by those pistol shrimp now for lying about.

[Ian Crossland]

So it creates a vacuum underwater. It forces the water away from each other. So there's a vacuum and then there's a burst of light from plasma or something. It's so powerful now everybody cavitation.

[Ami Kozak]

Everyone in the boom is going to think these pistol shrimp are a threat now and a threat in a danger because Tim was spreading fake.

[Tim Pool]

Apparently there are huge hawks in Australia that carry smoldering sticks. Everything in Australia to intentionally spread brush fires.

[Ian Crossland]

Everybody knows they'll carry flame things. Everybody knows, Ian, that Australia is a high level zone for endgame players.

[Tim Pool]

So that's what these maybe people mistook flying hawks with carrying flaming sticks as dragons that fly down and light brush.

[Ian Crossland]

On fire to be careful. The United, the United States is basically Elwyn Forest. Ok. It's a start. It's like there's bores everywhere. They can't hurt you and everything's fine and you're comfortable and you just run around and it's very easy.

[Tim Pool]

That's the starting zone for the alliance in World of Warcraft.

[Phil Labonte]

You're going to get Joy Behar tomorrow just going after you talking about pistol shrimp.

[Ian Crossland]

Tim Pool thinks that there's a forest of boars where you get experience points and well, it's called World of Warcraft.

[Phil Labonte]

Then they're going to read a legal note. We have to say Tim Pool did not.

[Ian Crossland]

Actually I do want to just mention as we get into the next story too, like World of Warcraft has become a hodgepodge of nonsense. And you know, all of the like, everything has become hodgepodge nonsense because they're trying to interconnect it like the Marvel Cinematic Universe. There's a funny meme where it's like the first movie comes out and they're like, wow, a billionaire in a flying suit. And then it's like 2024 and the multiverse is collapsing. Gods are fighting on the planet. There's a giant hand reaching out from the ocean because the Earth is an egg. Like none of it makes sense. The governments are collapsing, there's bombs, just nuts. And then you get games like World of Warcraft where they're like, the new expansion comes out and they're like, now we're underground. And I'm like, you've gone to other dimensions. You've gone to the past, to the future, now underground. Like at a certain point it's just, you're not expanding the story, you're just throwing random things into the mix. But anyway, I digress. Let's jump to this next story from ABC News. Russia launches new IR BM at Ukraine. Zelensky says Putin is terrified. Officials in Kiev initially said an ICBM had been launched towards Nipro. Now here's what's interesting about, interesting about this. The initial reports were that it was a merv, a multiple independently targeting reentry vehicle. That's an intercontinental ballistic missile. If that's true, it's the first use of an intercontinental ballistic missile in, in, in war ever. The US later came out denying it, saying it was not an icbm, it was an intermediate ranged ballistic missile. They say it's modeled off of a, an ICBM that Russia has. But it's not a nuclear weapon. It's a intermediate range ballistic missile strike. So it's, it's much, much less powerful. But it may actually be very comparable if it is modeled off or off of. I think it's called like the res 26 or something like that. It would carry four warheads. So it's a smaller yield weapon. But it's a ballistic missile strike on Kiev. That could explain why Kiev thought it was an ICBM because it looks very, very much like an icbm. However, I'll also add the west NATO, US could be lying because they are scared that this would be a direct Escalation. So let me put it this way. Russia keeps saying, ooh, if you do this, I'll nuke you. But then they don't. The west similarly does not want escalation outside of their control. So if Russia actually did this time launch an icbm, the west, not wanting to enter the fray on their terms. It's Sun Tzu would say, no, no, don't worry, it's not an icbm. It was a ballistic missile strike. It could be.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Hold on. An IRBM is essentially the same thing as an icbm. It's just for a different range. Like it says. An IRBM is a type of ballistic missile with a range between 3,000 and 5,500 km. This category falls between medium range ballistic missiles and intercontinental ballistic missiles. IRBMs are designed for regional targets and often used for military and strateg strategic purposes. Payload capacity 707, several hundred kilograms. Speed of around Mach 20. A guidance system often using inertial navigation or terrain reference systems and the ability to carry conventional or nuclear warheads. So it's the same thing as an icbm. It's just that it doesn't have the. It doesn't go as far.

[Tim Pool]

Differential of ICBM and IR is not about payload capacity. It's not about does it have a nuke or does it not? Because you can have an ICBM without a nuke on board.

[Ian Crossland]

Right.

[Tim Pool]

But it's about how far can they travel. That's all this.

[Ian Crossland]

So the question is, have. Have IRBMs been used in war ever?

[Ami Kozak]

The reason why they haven't or. Well, the R part, I don't know. But I think this is significant because ICBMs or I think for IRCBMs, they're supposed to be nuclear. It was conventional attacks. This is the first nuclear.

[Ian Crossland]

This is. Sorry, the Department of Defense is saying this is the first time this weapon has been used. Oh, no, no, no. They're saying on the battlefield in Ukraine. Come on, get specific guys. This both ICBMs and. Yeah, they're the same thing. ABC News outright says that IRBMS can carry nuclear payloads. It's the RS26 Rubiz missile, not res.

[Tim Pool]

From Southeast Asia to Australia. You could hit it with an irbm. So it would be intercontinental. It's just a different term.

[Ami Kozak]

I think this is a message to us, not to the Ukrainians. This is overkill. The Russians didn't need this missile to hit Ukraine. They were just showing that they had the ability to.

[Ian Crossland]

This, this legit was a mirv. I'm telling you. The west saying it's not an icbm, calm down. Is to control public sentiment towards the war. If they come out right now and say this is no different, this was a mirv, this is the first time they've used it in combat. A multiple Independently Targeted reentry vehicle. So it's a, it's a, it's a ballistic missile that shoots in the air and then ejects several payload that can target independent things. So depending on the power of a MIRV, you can get one that can carry eight to 12 warheads. One rocket, it has a ridiculous amount of power. And I want to stress this, people need to understand the bombs we dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are incredibly, incredibly weak compared to technology that was developed in the 60s. So modern nuclear weapons have around 1,250 times the explosive potential of Little, Was it Little Boy and Fat Man. And those were gravity. Right? Those were, those were, those are gravity bombs. That's a bomber flies over the target and drops it and it whistles. Then the kinetic impact boom. Modern weapons are rockets that drop payloads that air burst and then spread all over and just. It's nuts.

[Phil Labonte]

And the megatons are way, way, way, way more.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, right. And the, and the RS26 has a payload range of 150 kilotons to 300 kilotons, which would if that, if a missile of that power, just one of its warheads were. Unless they're, unless they're multiplying by four. But assuming that each warhead is going to be in that range between 150 and 300 would eliminate the entire metro area of Washington D.C. i don't want to mince words.

[Ami Kozak]

This is obviously an escalation. I will say though I do think Russia is treading lightly though, because. Because according to Reuters at least a US official said Russia notified Washington before its strike. And while another official said the US has briefed Kiev and its allies to prepare for the possible use of such a weapon. They did not want the Americans to confuse us for an attack on them.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Exactly. That's.

[Ami Kozak]

They did not want them to.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, the whole point was they didn't because the US and other countries obviously, but because the US does have advanced monitoring systems. A missile like this, when it launches, it took like five minutes was the actual travel time. But a missile like that within one minute. I read a book by, I forget the woman's name, but she was talking about what happens in a nuclear war.

[Phil Labonte]

She saw her on just on Joe.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Rogan a couple months ago or whatever.

[Phil Labonte]

Nuclear War, what can happen.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So I read her book and terrifying and it's, it's, it's really good. But like they know about the launches within 30 seconds. They have a trajectory within the first few minutes, I think seven minutes or something like that. So the Russians use the existing communication lines for nuclear launches to connect with the, with the United States and say, hey, we're going to do this. Just so you know, it's not a.

[Ami Kozak]

Nuke and it's not coming to you. Yes, yes, it's hitting Ukraine also.

[Tim Pool]

It sounds like it was a warning shot from the Russians saying this could have had nukes on board, by the way.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, yeah, flex of capability to just show what they're capable of doing.

[Ami Kozak]

Well, that's all Russia has left this kind of nuclear saber rattling conventionally they, I think they are failing to achieve what their initial military goals were in Ukraine. And now Putin's best weapon right now is trying to scare people into thinking that he would use nuclear weapons and.

[Tim Pool]

Hold off for two months until Trump's in office. I just did post a thing, I wasn't able to confirm or deny it, but that Putin's basically saying when Trump's in office, I'm open to discussing the ceasefire, let's get this over.

[Ami Kozak]

Well, I don't think it's so interesting because I hope Trump will be able to come some sort of agreement between Putin and Zelensky in Ukraine, but I just don't see the interests lining up like that. I don't think the Ukrainians want to get, give up any of their sovereign territory. A lot of pro Ukrainian people still think they want to liberate, liberate Crimea, which I don't think is ever happening. While on the other side I think it's within Putin's geopolitical interest to continue pushing west. He didn't think he got enough of Ukraine. I think he wanted to go up until at least Kiev early on in the war. I think that was his objective.

[Tim Pool]

If he kept pushing, I would advocate for war against the Russians.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think he was successful.

[Tim Pool]

Wait, he kept conquering west.

[Ian Crossland]

Wait, wait.

[Ami Kozak]

If he got to Kiev of. I mean I think that was his goal.

[Tim Pool]

Donbass. I understand that he wants access to the Black Sea for portage.

[Ami Kozak]

You think he wants up until the Donbass though?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, I think they want to transport steel through the Black Sea into the Mediterranean.

[Ami Kozak]

They want to be satisfied with the Donbas.

[Tim Pool]

20 to 30% enhance in their GDP as a result of trade.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Ian and a lot. There is a reason that NATO exists Right. Ukraine is not NATO.

[Ami Kozak]

Oh, I didn't go to war with just.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Okay, so.

[Phil Labonte]

But.

[Ami Kozak]

But Ukraine there.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The. Poland is a NATO country now. Right. And it borders Ukraine. You do not need to go to war for Ukraine. You do not need to go to war with Russia. Like direct war with the United States and Russia for Ukraine. If they were to attack Poland, then things are different because of NATO.

[Tim Pool]

It's not.

[Ami Kozak]

You think Ukraine is going to war with Russia if they were to invade Poland? Because I think for most people you say that's a contractual agreement.

[Phil Labonte]

You'd have to.

[Ami Kozak]

I don't even know the difference.

[Phil Labonte]

The treaty alliance would require it.

[Elad Eliyahu]

People understand the difference between NATO and non NATO countries, at least I think.

[Phil Labonte]

Isn't that the crux of the issue?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, that's.

[Phil Labonte]

The Ukraine was.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The whole point of me saying this is because, like Ian said, go to war over Ukraine. The whole point is Russia doesn't want NATO expansion into Ukraine, doesn't want the United States to go and be defending Ukraine. That's. That's what Russia said. And so like, to. To go to war over Ukraine.

[Tim Pool]

It would be about the belligerence. If he was actually trying to conquer Europe, which I don't think he is. If it, if he showed his hands like, look, I really do want to conquer, then it's like, no, 3.0, we're not going there.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That's what I said, though. I think that's what I said. That's what I said when I said. Right.

[Ian Crossland]

I said, it doesn't matter if Putin wants to conquer Europe or not. The wars that we're facing are not just some evil guy toying his mustache. Vladimir Putin sitting in his chair being like, we will take all of Russia now. No, he's saying, we need access to Crimea. We are not giving up a multibillion dollar industrial port and where our Black Sea fleet is stationed. And this is where we do a lot of our trade. And we will secure a land bridge and we will secure the Sea of. What is it? The Sea of Azov? Is that what it's called?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And he says, we're going to have that. Then what happens is the US Gets involved and starts supplying weapons. Then we blow up their flagship. Then Russia says they're attacking us when we're trying to secure this resource. How do we stop them? We're going to have to push them beyond the borders of the regions we have to control. Then you get Belarus involved. Then all of a sudden, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland are saying, Belarus is mobilizing and they're transporting weapons in Belarus. So Poland starts mobilizing. Now you've got Germany calling up 800,000 troops. It's not because any one side is trying to conquer. It's because there's one point where both sides bump into each other and then they keep saying, I'm going to win. No, you're not. It's a game of chicken that both people are going to crash into each other. You don't need Putin saying, I want to take over Europe to get full scale World War Three. Putin can say to China, look, if we lose access to Sevastopol and to this base, it's going to decimate our economy and it's going to give NATO too much control. Give us weapons and troops and we'll end this quickly. China, now, they've detained a Chinese vessel in the Baltic that Denmark is accusing of severing communications cables, which people fear may be a precursor to a larger scale attack. If China is involved and trying to grab some plausible deniability, this could escalate. Then with the US Saying, now we're going to put sanctions on China because you did this, all of it is Domino's falling over. Nobody wants war. War is a last resort. And, and this is a fact, there's a lot of people gonna say no. The war machine, they want war. I get that. I get that the war machine makes money by selling weapons and all these things. What I'm saying is for governments, what they want is money for the military industrial complex, they don't necessarily want war. They want sales. And so for Russia, they're thinking, we want to increase our economy. We want to get more for our people. Putin's saying largely for himself. And how do you do that? Well, we need access here. NATO is saying Russia's charging us too much and we need cheaper energy to Europe so that we can get costs down and expand the European economic bloc so that we can compete with China. So they claim both sides are fighting over limited resources and it's going to be Domino's falling over and it could potentially bubble up into something crazy unless. And this one's easy, Donald Trump intervenes in two months and says, we are done. We, it is better to accept the loss of Luhans, the Nets, Mariupol and Zaporizhia. And I guess what is that also, Carson, if it means no World War 3, we don't care about Ukraine. Give step back. Russia takes this, this territory. There's sanctions, there's penalties, whatever it might be, but there's no reason to Do a tit for tat. That expands the point where they're going to start firing more icbm.

[Ami Kozak]

Do you believe that Russia would be satisfied with just the Donbas and Crimea? Okay.

[Phil Labonte]

Do you think there's some kind of, like, aspirational goal of Soviet bloc dominance that. That motivates Putin to have some sort of.

[Ami Kozak]

I think they want borders 100% this.

[Phil Labonte]

Like, greater Rus ideology, Soviet empire, very much into that.

[Ian Crossland]

Vladimir Putin is mad the Soviet Union collapsed. He didn't think it needed to happen, and he's been trying to rebuild it with the Russian federal. It's the Federation trade. What is it? Whatever it's called, the Russian Federation trade bloc or whatever. The conflict in Ukraine, as complicated as it is, one component is that before Yanukovych was ousted, NATO and the EU were offering up deals to Yanukovych, saying, hey, open up trade with Europe. Do these things. We're gonna normalize your economy. It's gonna be able to join the eu, the Schengen Zone, all that. Your citizens will come and go as they please. Vladimir Putin said, if you open up trade to Europe and you have free trade with us, that means Russian goods are gonna flood into Russia and displace our manufacturing base. We can't have free imports. There has to be some controls on European goods.

[Phil Labonte]

Ukraine.

[Ian Crossland]

So let me. Let me rephrase.

[Tim Pool]

You might have misspoke. You said Russian goods will flow into Russia.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, sorry. European goods will flow through Ukraine. And then, because Ukraine has free trade with Russia, into Russia. Russia is basically saying, if we make a T shirt here and they start making it cheaper over there, and then it comes into Russia, we lose jobs. We can't do that. So they said to Ukraine, you're gonna have to choose whether you want free trade with Europe or free trade with us. Yanukovych then says, oh, boy, we got some leverage. The west then says, yeah, and we've got the CIA. So you get bubbling up protests. I'm not saying the CIA directly orchestrated this. I'm saying they have soft power and manipulation, telling Ukraine, you're going to go this route. Yanukovych tried playing both. He gets ousted, flees to Russia. They install a more west positive government that favors NATO and the eu. Vladimir Putin says, okay, now we're going to lose access to our industrial port and our Black Sea Fleet staging area, which is the naval base in Sevastopol. You. They are not satisfied with a single bridge in the. In what? The Kerch. The Kerch Strait.

[Tim Pool]

That's east.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Right. And so that got bombed recently. So Russia's thinking we need stronger control and access to this region. So of course they're going to take these regions so they can secure Sevastopol. Many people have said, but, Tim, why don't they just build in Sochi and build a naval base there? You're telling Russia abandon military technology, engineering and a base they've been using since the Soviet Union. They're just going to say, no, it's hundreds of millions of dollars and it's control and access. They're not just giving up the technology, they're not just giving up the infrastructure. They're giving up this regional control, this regional port. So then they're going to try and take this. Now it's possible Russia tries to push in for more. I doubt it. And I think the issue is that, that already you have Estonia and Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, they're in there. They're in NATO. And Ukraine now is inching towards it and they're saying they want to do that. Russia is basically like, okay, so on our entire border is one military alliance. As many people have said, we would not tolerate it if Russia started arming Mexicans and the cartels were fighting and stuff either. I'm not saying Russia's right. Russia's invasion was wrong. I'm just saying they may stop with taking the Donbass. And it's not just that. It's Luhansk, Donetsk, Mariupol, Kirsten, Zaporizhia, and then they control Crimea already.

[Phil Labonte]

Russia's so big, man. They have all that other stuff.

[Ian Crossland]

They need energy.

[Tim Pool]

They got all that.

[Phil Labonte]

You ever look at the globe and be like, man, Russia's big.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

You know what I mean? There's a counter to what you just.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Most of it. There's a lot.

[Ian Crossland]

Big.

[Phil Labonte]

No, I know it is big.

[Ian Crossland]

It's got more surface air than Pluto.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And so I read on the Internet one time, well, let's do this. And they have Dragon as I'm talking about Russia and the conflict. We have this story from Fox news caravan of 1,500 migrants forms in Mexico. They hope to reach the US before President elect Trump takes office in January. My proposal right now is any one of these individuals, in fact, nay, any individual from the point that Trump was, was formally declared the winner, should get an aggravated criminal charge for entering the United States.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Because it is apparent now by popular mandate that immigration is a problem that people want stopped. The entire Rio Grande Valley, all the southern border counties, said voting Republican, major shift. Make this stop. These people have outright Said to themselves, the American people have rejected us. We better run full speed to kick the door in before they can stop us. I say, okay, you want to play hardball? Aggravated charges, escalated charges to some degree for knowingly coming in at this point trying to bypass the popular mandate of these, of these people.

[Ami Kozak]

It feels like we're at a crossroads when it comes to this immigration issue. Either we have a serious border that you legally, you cannot cross and there will be penalties for crossing, or you do not. It's the biggest insult. Is it such a spit in the face to every legal migrant that ever came to this country for you to just cross the line and then get privileged access to what? You come to New York City, you're going to get a free hotel, you're going to be well fed, come with your entire family. We'll treat you very well. Not only that, you want to leave to another state, even though you may have shoplifted or committed a crime in New York, we'll buy a bus ticket for you to leave the state and go to, I don't know, some random Midwestern state where you could go and assault and then murder a jogger, a young woman, a young female jogger. And, you know, nobody cares. This is the case of Lake and Riley that has been so pivotal and significant in this past election.

[Ian Crossland]

And that video they released of the. The mom being informed is an. It's an. It's. It's a. It's worse than any horror movie you've ever.

[Tim Pool]

It's a little off. Daniel Penny also, we can talk about that. Maybe on the after show, he was. His interrogation got released.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That wasn't, that wasn't.

[Tim Pool]

Different story completely, but interesting. Yeah, the Lake and Riley thing, the guy got found guilty on 10 counts.

[Ami Kozak]

He was found like guilty of multiple things before this. He came here illegally. He was given all of these accommodations in New York City. He committed crimes in New York City. He was given a bus ticket to leave New York City to. I forget which state he eventually went to. Georgia, I think. Georgia. No, I do believe it was Georgia where he was living next to a college campus where a jog in Lincoln Riley was.

[Tim Pool]

And now the American girl's dead because of that. I think. What's the ultimate deterrence force, a force on the border? You know, it's just about can the American people. I don't want to spark a revolution inside the country because people like you can't harm them.

[Ami Kozak]

Can an American stomach a mass deportation effort from Donald Trump? The associated protests?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Find out.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, here's the thing you have to also understand like, that you can make easily common sense distinctions between criminals and violent criminals and prioritize who you're going to deport.

[Ami Kozak]

Sure.

[Phil Labonte]

And because even practically speaking, there's only a certain thing you can do before you start. Not to say that crossing the border illegally is not a crime, but there is a prioritization of violent criminals and going in and being able to have that conversation. Honestly, I think we're at a point now where you can do that. What's interesting is that during the campaign, like, Kamala Harris was trying to outperform Trump on her stance on immigration. Out of nowhere, remember, what was interesting was back in the day, 2016, 2020, Trump's views on immigration were seen as totally controversial, xenophobic, racist. And then the common sense meter moved in his favor. And the Democrats are trying to say, say we're good on it now and now that he's won, but Biden's still president, what's happening? It's really interesting. Like, did they just drop that as a talking point? You sort of show your cards when you do.

[Elad Eliyahu]

In 2016, when Trump first started talking about immigration, I had no sense that immigration was a problem. Right. Like, I had no, like I was like, really? Is there, is there, there's a problem with immigration. I mean, being from New England.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You know, like, it wasn't something that, that touched my area, part of the country very, you know, at least very.

[Phil Labonte]

He spoke about it rather provocatively. But.

[Elad Eliyahu]

He did.

[Ian Crossland]

He did.

[Phil Labonte]

But they're bringing drugs, but the truth, they're bringing crime.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The truth of the matter is he was right. And not only was he right, then the Democrats doubled down on all their policies. And I talked about this multiple times, but I'm going to talk about it again. The, the hhs, the Department of Health and Human Services had a house, has a program called the Refugee Resettlement Program. You can go to their website and look it up. The last time it was updated was 2021. And this program, program that they use to take people that come to the country and say, I'm looking for asylum. And they, they put them on planes and put them on buses and they send them to places that are purple states. So they send them to, they were sending them to Ohio. That's why Springfield, Ohio got all the attention that it was because they were sending the, they were sending people using the, using tax money, using federal dollars to, to relocate these people to places with the intent, with the goal of turning them from purple to blue. And the, that's what Musk has talked about. And people, people were saying, oh, that's not true. Not true. And if you are interested in looking to find out about the program, like I said, you can go to the HHS website. It's called the Refugee Resettlement Program. It is as real as the, as all of us sitting around the table. And this is something that they, that the government is doing, not just Democrats, but the government is doing because the government is run by Democrats, essentially. And most bureaucrats are Democrats. It was 95% of DC voted for Kamala Harri. It is so unrepresentative of the United States. But it's because the Democrats want to have a permanent one party, permanent one party control of the United States. And the means that they're trying to do is by changing the makeup of the states.

[Ian Crossland]

And it's funny because they may have accidentally done the inverse.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, hopefully Hispanics voted for Trump right.

[Ian Crossland]

Now they've created we don't deport him. They've created this Republican coalition. Yeah, well, the people here who are Hispanic and can vote don't get deported. But the Democrats are literally making that argument. They're saying Trump's going to deport legal Latinos who live in this country. It's like what he's not going to deport.

[Phil Labonte]

They see everything through the lens of identity and not exactly people who are just thinking ideas generated.

[Ian Crossland]

But here's the best part. Democrats, we were terrified. We're trying to secure a permanent majority single party rule. But they have gone so insane that now there's a debate inside the Democratic Party that they're either too woke or not economically populous enough. And both sides don't agree turning on.

[Phil Labonte]

Each other in the.

[Ian Crossland]

They've basically split into two parties. The far left party that says we, we should be more woke, we should talk about helping people. And the more moderate side of traditional Democrats saying we need to focus on union workers. And the Republicans are like, you know what? We already do that and we're not crazy. So we're good and we just won. That's why.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, I know there are illegal immigrants that some of them that are just super legitimate humans who would make great citizens, have they come in the right way that are like, there are too many illegal immigrants in this country. I bet it's gotten to that point.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's unlikely that the, that illegal immigrants are people that are like extremely skilled or whatever. Most of the people that are here that are coming illegally are coming illegally because they don't have. They don't have money, they don't have means to get here, they don't have connections. If you're, if you're a really smart person that excels in your home country, you have some kind of means. Like the one of the people that want to come here legally, but the people that come here legally are the people that are doctors and, and, and have, have, you know, either a business mind or they, they, they own property in their, in their countries and they want to, they want to move from there to here. But the people that come here illegally, they're, they're not.

[Phil Labonte]

But isn't there sort of sick tongue.

[Tim Pool]

In cheek, like it would be a funny sketch for Seamus to do of a guy who came here illegally in 2015 who's like, I can't take all these illegal immigrants. Like he's, just because he's actually like, like not because not all of them are obviously stupid, dumb, idiot, useless.

[Ian Crossland]

Just.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, no, they're, no, they're just average.

[Tim Pool]

You don't want to generalize.

[Phil Labonte]

But, but isn't there something to be said about anyone who wants to leave the conditions of a country that they don't like is resourceful enough to say, like motivated enough to say, ambitious enough to say that they want better for their families.

[Ami Kozak]

Is it incumbent upon us to take them in without, you know, is it.

[Phil Labonte]

No, I'm not making the argument you got to go through legal ports of entries and go through the process and respect the process. But in general, someone who's willing to uproot themselves and leave does possess more likely than not a certain driver motivation to improve their situation.

[Tim Pool]

It did seem like that over the decade, you would think, but then when there's NGOs that are ushering them along and getting kind of making profit doing it, I wonder if they're just actually being trafficked.

[Phil Labonte]

It also just. Immigration is a very. Trafficking the term immigration. Immigrants, depending on where they come from, are completely different people. And it's a very complicated subject because immigrants and immigration is not a monolith. It all depends on the culture that people come from, the backgrounds, the things that they bring with them. And you, you have to assess that on a case by case basis. So to. I think we're in a period now which is the good thing is that in a post woke world people can like express opinions and not presumed to be malicious. They can express like their concerns without people presuming, you know, we need a moratorium, baby.

[Ami Kozak]

I think we need a decade long assimilation period for everybody who's here I.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Used to have a negative view about that. I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm more and more I've warmed to that view significantly.

[Ami Kozak]

I think we also need to address. It's not only mass deportations that need to happen. Big business is in cahoots with illegal immigrants because they are the ones who pay them. So if we went after the big businesses who were paying these illegal migrants, they wouldn't have as much incentive to come here. They wouldn't have the means to stay and remain here, and they'd have to leave. So there are multiple methods that we have to adjust this from. We won't be able to mass deport everybody. We need to change the incentive structure around them. We've been, we've been allowing big business to frankly take advantage of these illegal migrants and that's why they come and stay here. We need to stop that incentive structure.

[Phil Labonte]

And also, if you have a welfare state, you have a problem if you have mass immigration plus a welfare state which can, which can drain even without.

[Ami Kozak]

The welfare state, though. But I agree with you, it makes it worse.

[Elad Eliyahu]

But what is it, 30 $500 a month they get on a credit card of federal dollars, but generally that they give.

[Phil Labonte]

You need an enforced board for an sovereignty.

[Ami Kozak]

And if you're an illegal migrant and you come to New York, you will have all accommodation provided to you. And if you want to leave, they'll also provide accommodation for you to leave.

[Ian Crossland]

Let's jump to this story from Fox Business. Lifelong Jaguar customer troubled by baffling woke rebrand going in a very sad direction. What I really love about this commercial, if you guys haven't seen it, is that it's, I don't know if it's so much as woke as it tries to be like futurist, post modernist art style and just not Jaguar. So they've got a bunch of different people wearing weird clothes with weird makeup and I guess, no eyebrows. Some have eyebrows. And this, this image, for instance, is really funny because it says break molds. There's a you in molds. But we get it, you're British. And there's, there's another tag. It said copy nothing. And everyone's showing this image alongside the Apple 1984 ad where it's a woman wearing orange and white with a sledgehammer and blonde hair. And they're like, like it's, it's like the same thing.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think that's a man.

[Ian Crossland]

Okay, well, perhaps. So the issue now is. Oh, and they're comparing it to Bud Light. So here's the thing. I kind of feel like we should watch this video. It's a 3 minute and 50 second long video. And this is tough because I'm like, I can't show you the context of Volvo's commercial because it's a. It's a 350 minute long story. But perhaps we should just watch right now and react to it. It this commercial. Okay, so let me break it down. The Jaguar commercial was weird, cringe, and probably produced before the election. Now they probably regret it, but they launched it anyway. Everyone is singing the praises of this Volvo video. This guy, Julian Huynh says Volvo posted a 3 minute, 46 second long ad on Instagram shot by Hoyt Van Hoytema, the cinematographer of Interstellar and Oppenheimer. It goes against every single rule you can think of about, think about as a social lead length format, overproduced. Every comment under the ad said it immediately put Volvo in their consideration set. It's effing fantastic. Now it's an ad. And if I got to say it normally, I'd say, let's play some clips. You can understand it. No, no, no. I think we got to watch this in full because the context around this is extremely important, the video. This is a short film. It's tremendously important culturally for, for what the future of this country and the countries it's advertising to, what it, what it means. And it's a car commercial. So just watch this. And I will say this. When I first saw it, I'm going, yeah, yeah. Okay. I get where they're going. I get it. And then the ending hit and I went, holy crap. Check it out. Hey. Hey. Okay.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh. For those that are just listening, she pulls out a pregnancy test. Hey, Mom. How are you guys?

[Ami Kozak]

How you doing?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, yeah, we're.

[Phil Labonte]

We're good.

[Ian Crossland]

Something wrong? No, no, no, no. But we've. We've actually got something to tell you. Kate's pregnant. Oh, Andy. Just joking. You're going to be a grandma. Oh, my God. How does it. I'm scared. Why are you scared about it all? You know, the knights, the responsibility. Like, we're gonna need a bigger place. I know. Bless you. I'm so sweet. I've got this feeling that we're gonna have a daughter just as stubborn as her mom. Hopefully not. The family's lounge. That's a legacy she might have to live with. She might be the reason we tired or not.

[Elad Eliyahu]

What if I don't do good in class?

[Ian Crossland]

I just want to say and do the right things.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You know.

[Ian Crossland]

I want to see the world with her also. Be happy staying home, doing nothing, letting her be a kid. Are you awake?

[Tim Pool]

Number 32.

[Phil Labonte]

Thank you.

[Ian Crossland]

I want to see her fall in.

[Tim Pool]

Love.

[Phil Labonte]

But I also know what that.

[Ian Crossland]

Means, and I know she's just going to bend the rules, just like I did.

[Phil Labonte]

One day.

[Ian Crossland]

I have to let her go. I think it's going to be gotten every single. I'm excited to hear what she learns about the world herself. Yes. She adores, she hates. I hope she likes the name we give her. Have you thought of any? It all depends. We, like now it says sometimes the moments that never happen matter the most. And he's in a hospital and he's with his wife. She gave birth to their daughter. And then it shows the accident that didn't happen because Volvo has good brakes. This is so good.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's really, really good.

[Phil Labonte]

So choked up a little bit.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. When I. When I first started watching this commercial and the reason why we had to play it in full, the context, in order for us to comment on. We can't just tell you what happens. You have to sort of experience. I know for people listening, it was much more difficult. Difficult. But it starts off with, we're having a kid. And I was like, I get it. I get it. I know everybody likes it because we saw that one other commercial where the guy and the woman are having the kid, and everyone celebrated it, but they literally turned it into this ab plot where he's talking about how happy he is to finally have a child and how he's scared of the responsibility. And then the B plot is his wife, who's pregnant, buying food, about to cross a street. And then a car is about to hit her, and it's a Volvo, and it breaks her so good she doesn't die and his child lives. And the reason why I think it's so powerful is you. Like, you take a look at what Jaguar is doing with this weird, creepy, futuristic art garbage. You look at these companies that are telling people that families are bad or that you should be guilty for having kids. And Volvo's like, let's do a commercial that's a short film celebrating having a family and showing you that our vehicles are safe as the twist. And it's like. Like, that's what commercials should be. And so we should encourage more commercials like this. Now I want to buy a Volvo.

[Tim Pool]

Let's show the Jaguar commercial back now. Now that we have some reference. This is what you're up against.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Let me pull up the Jaguar Commercial.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The first thing I thought when I saw the Jaguar commercial was Grace Jones from the 80s.

[Tim Pool]

Like, exactly. Copy nothing.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah. Looks like copy nothing. But it's like, well, this is just androgyny from the 80s. You talking about copy.

[Tim Pool]

I see it early on and they make a statement, like, it's all about, like, joy and happiness and everyone looks miserable.

[Ian Crossland]

Is it 30 seconds? Is that it?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, it's a short one.

[Ian Crossland]

All right, here you go. And it's painfully bad. It's just. It's painfully bad. Here we go.

[Tim Pool]

Exuberant. That's it. And everyone looks miserable.

[Ian Crossland]

Live vivid. Delete Ordinary break molds.

[Phil Labonte]

Should have done the V up.

[Ian Crossland]

Otherwise, people listening just hear weird music.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And then it's a bunch of weird makeup people. Copy nothing on Mars. They changed the logo. I. I don't necessarily think it's fair to call it woke. You know, people are saying, go woke, go broke and all that. I'm like, well, there's nothing in it that says anything about gender, ideology or race or anything like that. It's just cringe.

[Phil Labonte]

I got choked up from that, too.

[Tim Pool]

That's choking. It's like the end.

[Phil Labonte]

The end.

[Tim Pool]

The people in the comments were like, where's the car? What does this have?

[Ian Crossland]

I know, like, what to do with cars. When I first saw it, I didn't know it was the car commercial or for the car company. I thought Jaguar was going to be some, like, other brand thing. I thought it be, like an art. Yeah. And then they're like, no. Like, people were like, look at the old logo. I was like, wait, that was the car? So apparently what's happening is they want to go all electric vehicle.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Oh.

[Ian Crossland]

Or they say a fully realized electric fleet or something. The language alluded to the fact they're going to do evs. And so they decided this is the route to go and should have put.

[Tim Pool]

A car in it at least. Like, I know, driving by in the background or something.

[Ian Crossland]

Meanwhile. Well. And, you know, I do kind of feel bad for him because they probably put a bunch of money into this from before the election. And then I wonder if after the election they're sitting there going, do we still run this ad? Meanwhile, Volvo was producing theirs well before the election. And they were like, look, people want safe cars because they have children.

[Tim Pool]

We should.

[Ian Crossland]

That's the commercial.

[Tim Pool]

If you pull it up on Twitter, the comments from Jaguar. In response to the comments of, like, what this Gar. They keep responding. Do you sell cars?

[Ian Crossland]

Elon's the first.

[Ami Kozak]

That's funny.

[Phil Labonte]

You love Incredible trolling.

[Ian Crossland]

We'd love to show you. Join us for a cuppa in Miami on 2nd of December. Warmest regards, Jaguar. Hello. Thanks. Crusader says boycott Jaguar along with any. Any other business that still doesn't get it. They said, thanks for the feedback. We'll be sure to pass on to the team best wishes. This is surely a joke that's at a pivotal moment. Let me just jump to the replies.

[Phil Labonte]

Maybe it's brilliant.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, good.

[Ami Kozak]

I saw all the vibrant colors and you're thinking, oh, maybe they're bringing one of these weird colors to one of the cars. You know, maybe they're doing something interesting. Maybe they're breaking the mold with like a weird, weird, vibrant orange or yellow. Nah, they're just. I don't know what's. What. What mold are they breaking?

[Tim Pool]

They should have had some indication of.

[Phil Labonte]

What they're doing, which should have been the opposite of the Volvo thing, where they all get hit by a Jaguar at the end instead of the brakes.

[Ian Crossland]

You know, look, look at this. Look at this image. Look what they're doing with this vehicle. Like, is this really what they think they're going to be selling fine Porsche from the 80s. But I'm telling. You know what happened?

[Ami Kozak]

Some.

[Ian Crossland]

Some millennial women came into the marketing department and they said, said jag. The company said, look, sales are down in this area. What can we do to revitalize the brand? And they brought in some woke millennial women with big glasses, the huge oval frames, and she, like, pushed them up and she's like, we're gonna go, he's post modern. Yo. Postmodern art.

[Tim Pool]

Warhol all the way. What would Andy Warhol do? It's gonna copy nothing. Let's copy him.

[Ian Crossland]

It's gonna look like a tv. It's gonna look like what they thought. And it's okay how I say this, it's going to look like a. Like what people in 1950s thought a TV in the year 2000 would look like. There you go.

[Ami Kozak]

You got to wonder if this stuff's bait. Nowadays, retro companies know they're going to get a ton of attention. There's going to be a bunch of news stories written about it. Oh, Jaguar's new car breaks the mold. And there was a anti. LGBTQ commentators say that, oh, no, they're still in the mold.

[Tim Pool]

We are talking about them now. Jaguar electric vehicles say, maybe it's brilliant.

[Phil Labonte]

Maybe it's like an anti.

[Ami Kozak]

No, we're being scoped. We're taking the bait. The world.

[Ian Crossland]

I will. I will tell you this. The One thing they have going for that them is that Democrats and liberals will do whatever the right. They'll do the opposite of whatever the right is doing. So when it came to like RFK Jr being like, I don't think we should eat poison, they're like, oh, yeah, now they're advocating for McDonald's as much. Well, you guys go to the gym?

[Ami Kozak]

No, I'm going to stay home, eat a bunch of hamburgers.

[Phil Labonte]

I just wanted to be subject to.

[Ian Crossland]

A nine study and blind study, non placebo trial. That's exactly it. Yes. And so now you've got. There's beef jerky here, but it's processed.

[Phil Labonte]

And I think we should subject it.

[Ian Crossland]

To a ball jerky, non placebo. But now you've got Chris Maurer, who is doing this video, is being like, it's not the chemicals in the food that are making people fat. It's that you're eating garbage and not exercising. It's because I got a. I'm in a box that makes small explosions in the back that propels me forward. And it's like, okay, dude, you are so incredibly wrong on all of this, but why are you defending butylated hydroxy toluene in our food? You don't even know what that is. I don't even know what that is. All I know is I don't need to eat it. And if you come to me and say, but the studies say it's safe, I don't care, how about I just eat, I don't know, meat and rice.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Just simple things. And they're gonna be like, but you know there's a chemical compound called this that. Yes, I know, but it came from the ground and I know I can eat it. They've got Democrats and liberals defending eating weird chemicals that are lab made like that New York Times fact check against RFK Jr. So what's likely gonna happen is a bunch of liberals are gonna be like, I'm buying a Jaguar now. Like these, these. Who was it who said these celebrities tweeted they sold their Teslas.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Then they bought other EVs.

[Phil Labonte]

So ridiculous.

[Tim Pool]

Ellen DeGeneres. She's moving to England.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah. Did you see the sh. Gillis Bud Light commercial?

[Ian Crossland]

What?

[Phil Labonte]

Shane Gillis new Bud Light commercial.

[Ian Crossland]

Better. But I'm not a fan. What did he do? No, I'm of.

[Phil Labonte]

Of the commercial. What they. What they're trying to do.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. So it's like Shane Gil sitting in a chair and he's like, I think I'm in the wrong commercial. And they're like, aren't you what? What did they say? Aren't you like this other guy? And he's like, no. And they're like, oh. And then shows another guy going woo. And drinking beer. And I was like, okay, yeah, you know, it's, I got to chuck a lot of it because Shane's just going like, what's going on? But there was no heavy jack joke. I feel like. I'm sorry, dude. Look, Shane Gillis is super funny, but they are desperately trying to rescue this dead brand and they think they're going to get by without actually addressing the fact that, hey, look, I said we should own it and take their money. But doesn't matter what I think. I'm one guy. The right has said never unless they apologize. And they think they're going to get through without apologizing.

[Phil Labonte]

It's more about what doing a commercial like that means about the culture. Because what they're trying to appeal to is what people actually resonate with, with. Whereas like in the woke advertising world in a lot of situations, it's not like these people really ideologically believe this stuff. They're just like, we think this is the trendy, resonant idea. So we're going to try to do this, you know, nonsensical far like postmodern approach, thinking it will resonate. And I think we're in a time now where it's like they're realizing it's being rejected. It's funny like when you see SNL trying to like go edgy, more right wing and being okay with certain things. And I don't buy it because it's like you're just, you know, you're trying to say, oh, you were, you were like self critical and self aware the whole time when you weren't. So it's this pandering kind of thing. But it more reflects what, that they're trying to appeal to what most common.

[Ian Crossland]

Sense people feel Volvo deserves to just make a billion dollars for doing a good ad that celebrates family and safety. They, they made a very basic commercial. There's no weird colors, there's no ideology. It's just literally a guy who's excited to have a kid, which is a normal human experience. And then there's like, the brakes work and you're, it's going to keep people safe and you're like, that's all we care about. That's that, that's it. You've, you've sold me. So I hope, I hope we reward marketing campaigns like that. And Jaguar I, you know, look, I want, I want Jaguar to do what Volvo did. So I hope they do lose money and realize this is a terrible campaign. I think it's fair to say it's not woke necessarily just because it's weird art stuff. It's just cringe.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, it reminds me of like, of an 80s movie that like had an advertisement in the movie. Like it's something that like you would see as a commercial like for. In Ro. In RoboCop 2 or something like dystopian 80s.

[Ian Crossland]

Exactly.

[Phil Labonte]

Or like Demolition man portrayal.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Exactly.

[Phil Labonte]

Like everything is just messed up.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Look, look, it's so futuristic and crazy and blah, blah, blah. Isn't it cool? And it's like the point of those commercials was to be like fifth element.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, that's the movie I was thinking of.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Ridiculous. The point of those, of those to be ridiculous and, and, and be beyond what people would kind of, you know, consider normal. And Hunger Games. I don't think that this makes anybody want to buy a car. I don't think that it makes Hunger Games. Yeah, I mean that's, that's very similar to the, to the idea, but I don't think that makes anyone want to buy a car.

[Phil Labonte]

I don't know who the demographic that they're after is. I thought Jaguars is like for like, you know, sort of dads who want a sportier car or like a fancy, like, I don't know, I thought it.

[Ian Crossland]

Was supposed to be like an up upscale, you know, six figure guy who's looking for a high end car so he can be like, I got a Jag. And you're like, oh, wow, that's a great vehicle. Now it's going to be this weird, like sleek, solid pastel.

[Tim Pool]

It's owned by Tata Motors, an Indian multinational automotive company. So that's interesting.

[Ami Kozak]

I'm getting David Bowie vibes from the person in the dress that I think. And in the dress, the dude with.

[Tim Pool]

The, with the sledgehammer.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah, yeah. Right, with the hair and the.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, the whole video.

[Ami Kozak]

I don't know. Was, was David Bowie gay too or lgbt?

[Tim Pool]

Bisexual, I think.

[Ami Kozak]

I don't know. I couldn't name.

[Tim Pool]

Had a thing. Allegedly, I believe.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Is that true?

[Tim Pool]

I don't know.

[Ami Kozak]

I'm a Jackson guy.

[Tim Pool]

That's what they wanted society to believe.

[Ian Crossland]

I'm gonna do just a. Before we go to super chats, we'll just do a quick, a quick little snippet so you know, we have time for a full segment. But Nick Sorter is reporting that Donald Trump is considering Mike Rogers for FBI Director. With Cash Patel as Deputy Director, the plan could please both Senate Republicans concerned about Trump's plan to disrupt the FBI and also appeasing the MAGA orbit who have been frustrated about why more of their allies have been placed in top jobs. Cash Patel. You know, right now there's this clip from Tim Cass Dirl going viral with Kanakoa. The great tweeted it. Elon Musk himself tweeted it. And it's Cash explaining about the two tier system of justice and these things. Things. It's got like 20 million views or some ridiculous amount. And I am honored to have hosted the show where Cash came on. But Cash has proven exactly why in that segment, why he needs to be the FBI director.

[Tim Pool]

Literally looking me in the eyes on that clip. That was. That it was. He was looking at me, telling me that info. That's me listening to him while we were all listening to him. That was. He's a. He is. He is beyond Deputy bro. He's the man.

[Ami Kozak]

Mike Cash money.

[Ian Crossland]

They're. Mike Rogers has not come near the depth of conversation and context on the issue that, that Cash Patel has.

[Tim Pool]

That guy.

[Ian Crossland]

And so cool. And the concern, of course, because this should have been announced a long time ago. Cash Patel is clearly the guy Trump had praised his book. Cash has been talking about it for some time and there's concerns about the Senate saying no. And I think that's ridiculous.

[Ami Kozak]

I think it would be a confirmed position. That's probably why they're trying to do Deputy.

[Ian Crossland]

And then he's not confirmed.

[Ami Kozak]

No, no, no. I think they're trying to put him as deputy because it'd be hard to have him be at the top.

[Ian Crossland]

But doesn't Deputy have to be confirmed as well or no?

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, Deputy would have, but it's not as this. Not a senior position.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah, right.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And then it's going to restrict what he can do and you're going to get Mike Rogers going to be like, well, let's not rock the boat too much. I think Cash, look, I, I'm not going to be surprised if this is what happens. Okay? We got RFK Jr. And HHS. I hope he gets in because that is still a nuclear bomb on the beltway and in the industries of this country as it pertains to food preservatives and all that stuff. It's still great. Tulsi as DNI is great. I think it's fair to say we want to win everything. But the reality would be, I suppose if we get a handful in I'll take what I can get, you know, but I still think it's a tremendous gain, even though I'm. What I'm saying is it should be cash.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, go for cash. Make them vote. Do it. Make the Senate do its job. If they say no, then appoint somebody else. But do cash.

[Ian Crossland]

Do.

[Tim Pool]

Dude, appoint Matt Gaetz. Like what? Make them do their job. Go. Make them say no. Put it on record.

[Ami Kozak]

The reason that they don't want to go through the confirmation process if they know they're not going to get in is that it just wastes time. The Trump administration. So you know, their first 18 months is when you actually get to.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Exactly.

[Ami Kozak]

Because the midterms are already around the corner. So if you're not in the first three months, if you're only acting as the acting AG or what have you, you're not going to be able to really affect as much change change than you'd be able to do if you were confirmed quickly. Moreover, once you're done with confirmation, Senate could start confirming judges and get onto other business. If they're stymied and stuck, you know, on these comfort, on these, you know, confirmation hearings that aren't going anywhere, it's just wasting Congress's time.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

The counter or you're, you're actually right, you're taking the non purist view, which is probably the right way in politics. The other idea is pointing the wrong guy is a waste of time. So, but I think you're, you're right.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You've got, if they like just like he said, 18 months is all they've got shot. And, and, and there's a lot of stuff that they want to get done in the first. And they can do it. If they get people in place that are going to do the job, they can do significant damage to the, to the, to the bureaucracy.

[Tim Pool]

If he was to appoint a guy, Mike Rogers or whatever, and then wasn't happy with the way he was doing, can he like remove him and then.

[Phil Labonte]

Appoint somebody happen in the first round all the time.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Ami Kozak]

Trump, all of these guys will likely get fired within. They're not going to serve all four years in the Cabinet. Nobody usually makes it all the way through.

[Tim Pool]

And then it would be the same process like they'd. Would he remove Mike Rogers? There'd be an act enacting.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yes, he may, he might have someone.

[Tim Pool]

Lined up right away and then they have to go to confirmation and that could take what, a month, a two week. Do they go right into the Senate like a week later? 5.

[Ami Kozak]

Depends on what the Senate has planned on their slate. If they're going through other things, you know, God willing, Trump might get another Supreme Court appointment in this term.

[Phil Labonte]

I so mayor got like, allegedly there's.

[Ami Kozak]

Something going on with her and a lot of libs were hoping that she didn't pull another RGB where she would die or where she's only in her.

[Phil Labonte]

70S, but she's apparently have some health issues. Apparently. I don't know for sure.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't want her to die, but it'd be nice if she stepped down.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Ami Kozak]

During Trump's.

[Phil Labonte]

It's nice. Yeah, that's nice.

[Tim Pool]

What about age limits? This is a whole other conversation. Age limits or just term limits first?

[Phil Labonte]

Well, term limits he talked about.

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, no, no, no. The point of, the point of not having term limits is so that way they're not political.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah, right.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You keep, they go, they get appointed for life. So that way they don't, they, you don't have people step out and then you have political appointments.

[Tim Pool]

Do you think they're not political?

[Elad Eliyahu]

They are, they are to a degree.

[Ami Kozak]

They don't need to be to the whims of the public. They don't need to worry about. Oh, I need a. They won't be political in deciding their cases because they don't need to worry about their political future. No reelection office ever.

[Tim Pool]

What if it was just one long term per justice? Eight years always.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That's what life is.

[Ami Kozak]

I think it could be 20 years. But like, I guess the idea is to have it be long term and if you want to have change, go to the House of Representatives.

[Phil Labonte]

You want to keep the judiciary as far removed from, from the executive legislative as possible. So they do get. It is political under a problem is.

[Tim Pool]

What, what's problem is when one president appoints half of the Supreme Court?

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, that's not a problem.

[Tim Pool]

That is a big problem.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Why?

[Tim Pool]

Because biases the court towards the whims of the President. The President picks who they know.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It doesn't bias. Bias to the, to the whims you're supposed to have. The court is not supposed to have politics.

[Phil Labonte]

But no people do.

[Tim Pool]

I know, but they're not.

[Phil Labonte]

No, but to be fair, if it's a Republican president, they're going to pick more right of center judges.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah, but then they need to get the President's elected, then they need to go to the Senate and they need to get confirmed in the Senate as well.

[Ian Crossland]

They're going to pick textual, constitutional, original.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Constitutional, and that's what they're supposed to Be you're not. Listen, the court is not supposed to make law from the bench. They're supposed to read the law and say this is what the law says.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, this is the living.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, that's what, that's the whole point. So all the people that are like, oh well the Constitution needs to be interpreted, know the hell it doesn't.

[Ian Crossland]

There is, it's right. So the issue is the Democrats go judicial. It says a well regulated militia. Well, as we know, regulated means government control. And then the originalists say no, regulated back then meant well equipped, like your guns are working and are in proper order.

[Phil Labonte]

And they're the same throughout the philosophical disagreement. Right, the.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, I don't, I don't think living.

[Phil Labonte]

Breathing document.

[Ian Crossland]

People lying for power.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The best argument for against a living document is in the Constitution itself. The fact that there is a stringent and rigorous amendment process indicates strongly that it was not intended to be interpreted. If it was intended to be interpreted, they wouldn't have put an amendment process in there at all. And the fact that it's so stringent indicates that they wanted it to be very hard.

[Ian Crossland]

They knew that it would be interpreted, which is why the second amendment does so. Second Amendment, easy argument. Anybody just read the original article on what they were intending and it's all written there. And the founding fathers wrote the intentions. They wanted people to own guns. That's it. There's a variety of reasons why they should. It's not just about government tyranny, it's about foreign invasion, foreign and domestic. The idea is, okay, if a government becomes tyrannical to these ends and people are being abused, citizenry need to be able to defend themselves. Most importantly, however, if we are invaded, militia is a strong portion of our defense. The regular citizens need to be able to defend their homes, arms and rise up if they're conscripted. Then they said, well let's put in there then that you don't need to be conscripted to have a gun because we want everybody to have guns. So they originally did. Then they were like, whoa, whoa, wait a minute. If we include this portion that says it is not a requirement to serve in order to bear arms, people will argue that the intention of the amendment was to make it so that people could dodge conscription. People have to be conscripted. Okay, let's take that out now. It's vague, but they knew interpretation was likely. That was the best they came up with because all the articles from the original there were, I believe 17 were incredibly wordy and, and funny enough the salary apportionment and the size of Congress, I think were the first two. And I think the first article didn't get amended until like the 90s or something. Something on salaries. It's kind of funny, actually. Let's, let's.

[Tim Pool]

There was a show talking about constitutional interpretation.

[Ian Crossland]

There was.

[Tim Pool]

I was watching the show last night. People were talking about whether or not the US Constitution was insinuating that it was the US Was a Christian nation or.

[Ian Crossland]

We talked about that.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah, it was this show. Yes, that was a good argument.

[Ian Crossland]

And the answer is that it is.

[Tim Pool]

Well, we'll go deeper on.

[Ami Kozak]

I wanted to fact check real quick earlier. I said the deputy director of the FBI did need Senate confirmation. I believe they don't actually need Senate comfort.

[Ian Crossland]

Deputy for deputy. That's why he's trying to. He's trying to make sure cash can get in something.

[Ami Kozak]

I wanted to get that right so we don't get sued by.

[Ian Crossland]

I'll make. I'll make one quick point on the discussion that we were having yesterday on the US As a Christian nation to clarify because a lot of people don't understand. Understand the Founding Fathers did not intend for the United States to be a theocratic government.

[Phil Labonte]

That's what I was watching and.

[Ian Crossland]

Right. And what people keep saying is, is it a Christian nation? The Democrats take the most direct and single ordered thinking imaginable by saying a Christian nation is a theocratic government where the church has say in government. No, they want a separation of church and state. Okay, guys, a Christian nation. What they meant was it was founded upon morals and teachings in the Christian faith. Jefferson may have been a deist, but his morals were largely built upon Christian faith.

[Tim Pool]

You know, my take was that it. They understood that religions evolve and that we may in the future have a religion that is even more moral than Christianity and that the country will still function as long as there is a moral religion behind it. That's. I mean, I think they're pretty widespread.

[Ian Crossland]

So very simply put, Hinduism was a religion they knew about at the time and it did not have a right to a jury trial or a belief in the protection of the innocent. Innocent. So when they said a moral and religious country, they weren't referring to any religion that.

[Phil Labonte]

No, but I think. I think the difference. What I was confused about watching last night was there was a. Like the idea that it's been informed by religious principles is different than Milo was saying that it's being prescribed to specific groups and only those groups. Like it's for Christians rather than the Principles themselves being animated and informed by and influenced by Christian principles, which is different. And then the separation of church and state. In other words, we do not have an enforceable religion that ever everyone has to subscribe.

[Ian Crossland]

But there is no formal separation of church and state.

[Phil Labonte]

What do you mean?

[Ian Crossland]

It was. The separation of church and Church and state is a written intent. It's not in any documents or anything like that.

[Phil Labonte]

Okay. That there's but the principle of a separation of a church and state, that we don't have an official church of the United States that people have to pay to.

[Ian Crossland]

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm fairly certain they did not write down, we hereby separate church and state.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, I think it is written down. I don't know. I could be wrong.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It was a letter.

[Ian Crossland]

Right.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Official thing.

[Phil Labonte]

That principle is a healthy one because it allows for peace, peaceful religions to exist under a bedrock of principles that are informed by Christian, Judeo, Christian values.

[Ian Crossland]

All right, so the point that Milo made, which I agree with, is that when you have a set of values that are rooted in Christian moral teachings, that 99.9% of the country follows and you say these rules are for a moral and religious people. They're not talking about Buddhism, they're not talking about Hinduism, they're not beefing with them. But they're saying the idea of the right to avoid self incrimination, a speedy trial, to jury lawsuits, to the sovereignty of states, these are rooted in the Christian moral tradition. It all. And it all stems back obviously because of the structure of European government and how it came to the United States and it was very much informed by Christianity. So my point was. Well, Milo may be saying it's prescribed.

[Phil Labonte]

For Christians, which to me sounded exclusionary.

[Ian Crossland]

Which was perhaps it's too much. But I think his point is correct that when you apply these things to people who have no moral virtue and do not abide by these, they're postmodernists of a different ideology. They weaponize them against good moral people.

[Ami Kozak]

I think a lot of people.

[Ian Crossland]

We.

[Ami Kozak]

Don'T need to get into it. Well, it's just that our founding fathers were like, these guys didn't accept Jesus Christ. A lot of modern day Christians.

[Ian Crossland]

How many of them? George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, a couple.

[Ami Kozak]

George Washington, our founding father, first president of the country. He didn't believe that Jesus Christ was a messiah, but they were deists.

[Ian Crossland]

The distinction was they didn't believe God was intervening in governmental affairs like many other countries did when they thought the heads of state were appointed by God. They still believed in the Christian world teachings. That's why Benjamin Franklin expanded upon Blackstone's formulation, which is rooted in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.

[Ami Kozak]

Are any of our modern day Christians calling George Washington a Christian? He didn't accept Jesus Christ. I don't think any of them.

[Ian Crossland]

Right, but he wasn't a Christian.

[Phil Labonte]

We're really talking about the. Where do individual rights and the concept of sovereign individual rights come from a Christian that's informed.

[Ami Kozak]

We need to make this a culture.

[Phil Labonte]

War, as you could say.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, but it is factually correct to say it was a Christian God. They said that we have rights bestowed to us. They are unalienable by Christians backpacked off.

[Ami Kozak]

Of the Jewish God. So I think Christian. It's a monotheistic God. Let's go monotheism.

[Phil Labonte]

Let's.

[Ami Kozak]

One God is what's important because the.

[Ian Crossland]

Country was 99.9% Christian. And the moral.

[Ami Kozak]

You're Christian if you don't accept Jesus Christ?

[Ian Crossland]

No.

[Phil Labonte]

Okay.

[Ami Kozak]

So I don't think 99% of the country was literally. Just look it up.

[Ian Crossland]

It's true.

[Phil Labonte]

We're talking a little. But they've called George Washington the deism. This idea of like, I'm not including.

[Ian Crossland]

Founding fathers were deists does not negate that the entire country was Christian.

[Ami Kozak]

I don't think it was 99.9. I think I'll look it up, Google it right now.

[Ian Crossland]

And so the issue that I'm pointing out is, yeah, they are saying here's a list of rights that we believe are unalienable that God has given us. They're not talking about, you know, Krishna or something or Shiva. They're talking about the Christian God. They believe that these and the moral.

[Ami Kozak]

What is a Christian God? Do the Muslims have a different direction Christian God? No, because I think it's about monotheism here. They believe in the one God.

[Ian Crossland]

Muslims have a different directive than Christians do. I don't think that the founding fathers were entertaining a religion that instructed its people to kill Jews. Do you think that the founding fathers were like a good moral and religious person who would follow the words of the hadith and attack Jews?

[Ami Kozak]

Jews.

[Ian Crossland]

That's what they were referring to. No, I don't think so either.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Muslims would say that it's a different God too. Because they say that the Christians are. They say that they're polytheists. They say that because they believe Christ in the Holy Spirit and God. They. They say the Christians believe it's a trinity.

[Ian Crossland]

Let's go to Super Chats.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, we're gonna head over to.

[Ian Crossland]

Okay, here's we're gonna do. We're gonna go. We're gonna go nuts in the members only where we can get deeper, dive into this stuff. So smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Right now you can go to timcast.com you can click join us to become a member. I see that on YouTube. We got 53 new members, but that's YouTube membership. And if you want to watch the uncensored show, that'[e-mail] where you'll sign up for the website, become a member and you'll get access to the Discord server where there are 21,000 people currently hanging out. And you can join the movement and be friends with them and they'll be friends with you. There's meetups. Some people got married. I don't know, I'm not trying to, you know.

[Phil Labonte]

And they were in a Volvo commercial.

[Ian Crossland]

Not in a Volvo commercial, but we've had, I think more and more than a few people who joined the Discord ended up meeting up and getting married. Married. So that's very cool. That's very cool. So timcast.com but we'll grab your super chats right now. Alpha Turkey says Mike Lawler, say goodbye to Congress. Well put attack in that note because we can't forget we got two years. Mike Lawler is gloating over Matt Gates stepping down and Elon Musk said anybody who's disrupted to Trump's agenda, you get the primary.

[Ami Kozak]

Can I say a tidbit on Mike Lawler? He was, I think this. He's a sophomore now in Congress from I believe, what was it, the 17th district of New. He's so revered by the establishment right now because he won in the New York 17th district against who was this? Sean Patrick Mahoney Maloney, who was like a ten time or seven or eight time elected congressman in the seat. He turned to a blue seat, red. And this was kind of the idea of a future type of Republican in the sort of northeast blue, purple areas that could really change the game moving forward. So I don't know if any sort of MAGA candidate would be able to win in this district is kind of what I'm getting at.

[Ian Crossland]

Jason Dixon says, hey, Tim, please shout out the Discord. Can you please point out the Discord is not a freedom of speech platform and no one is free to jeopardize the community because they want to say stupid ish. The Discord is a community. Community has rules and Those rules exist because we want to preserve and sustain this community so people can meet up. The Founding Fathers met in bars and pubs. That's how they were able to come to these ideas and these conclusions that ultimately birthed this once, this, this now great nation. I was going to say once because we're going to make it great again, but I want to correct myself and say it is great. It's been great and it's going to be greater than it's ever been before. And that was because of the meetings the Founding Fathers had. So we've got the Discord server. You can. For those that don't know what that is, it's a chat room. It's. You download an app, you sign up, and you're in this chat room with live shows, pre shows, meetups, and there's, there's actively right Now, I think, 21,000 active people who are in it. So it's massive. And you're probably going to find friends in your local area. I think it's very important that we link up, we make friends, we stay involved, and that's how we build these cultural bonds. Let's grab some more. Is this. Dom says Bondi is a Kushner hire. She's from the afpi, which is run by Brooks Rollins, Kushner's pal and Linda McMahon. Makes sense.

[Ami Kozak]

AFPI First Policy Institute. Sounds horrendous.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. All right. Mike Mo says nuclear war is bad for kittens. Indeed it is.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It is.

[Ian Crossland]

We have Seamus 3 on the production property. Maybe, maybe Ian should capture him.

[Tim Pool]

Seamus, sir?

[Ian Crossland]

Well, you know, because we named the cat Seamus. You know, he Seamus1 and the cartoonist is Seamus2. We just don't have names for any other other cat. So another cat popped up on the property and we just calm Seamus. Oh, so now he's Seamus 3.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, my gosh.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. Seamus the cartoonist can keep number two. I do like maybe, maybe in should capture number three.

[Tim Pool]

A lot of responsibility for a guy eating.

[Phil Labonte]

Eating the cats. You got to be careful.

[Ian Crossland]

You do indeed. All right, let's see what we got. Jacob Paul says Pam Bondi is a never Trumper. The lady was on Fox a year ago saying the party should do anything to stop Trump. She was also the AG of Florida that pushed Epstein stuff under the rug and let a lot of the crime limitations lapse. She's a deep neocon.

[Ami Kozak]

She also served on his first impeachment as his defense attorney. I did read something about her being a lobbyist for Qatar in between servings in office.

[Tim Pool]

So is that the AG nomination.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah, the shoe in for aging lobbyists for Qatar, lobbies for Qatar early days gigs.

[Phil Labonte]

You know, you got to take some money.

[Ami Kozak]

I've never lobbied for Qatar, but who said I wouldn't? Who says I wouldn't take the money? Surge my agent over here. Maybe he could. Hey, any Qataris want to reach out to Serge?

[Ian Crossland]

What do you think about Qatar?

[Ami Kozak]

It is.

[Ian Crossland]

Qatar is an Islamic nation.

[Ami Kozak]

No, I think it's bad. I think it's bad that any of our politicians are taking money from Qatar. I think it's bad to be in bed with. I think they hosted the recent FIFA World Cup. Nobody cares about any of their human rights abuses of anybody in the Middle East. It's really swept under the rug.

[Ian Crossland]

I want to point this out. There is a difficult contradiction for platforms like YouTube in their hate speech policies, in that the Islamic faith following the Hadith. The Hadith literally says that they have to kill Jews. That's insane. I'm sorry, I'm not going to.

[Phil Labonte]

What's the context? Kidding.

[Ian Crossland]

Do you know? Do you like, you know, I assume it says that the world. What is it? The end will not come until the rocks cry out. There is a Jew hiding behind me.

[Phil Labonte]

It's in the Hamas Charter, Article 7.

[Ian Crossland]

Exactly.

[Phil Labonte]

There is a Jew behind them. Oh, come and kill him.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. How do you reconcile this? Like, oh, you can't disparage a religion when the religion calls for death and murder of another religion. I mean, I got no beef with any of the individuals, but that in and of itself is dangerous.

[Ami Kozak]

And I think guitar is a very bad actor on the.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, that's fine. My point is that writing that was in the Hamas charter, that is in the Hadith, that targets a religious group for death and destruction is not good. And the contradiction is not great. How is YouTube supposed to handle this? Like, don't disparage a religion when the religion instructs its people to kill other people. If someone went on YouTube who was a Muslim and read that charter from Hamas and they read that line from the hadith. Hadith, what's YouTube's reaction? Are they going to be like, oh, it's a religion. We can't do anything about it.

[Ami Kozak]

I don't think they give a crap. You know, you never see any of, like, the right wing watch ever going after, like, Muslims or any of their extreme rhetoric.

[Ian Crossland]

No, they're left wing.

[Phil Labonte]

You mean left wing.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah, yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

You meant the left wing watch.

[Ian Crossland]

No, no.

[Phil Labonte]

Right wing watch.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Ami Kozak]

Right wing watch never goes after otherwise misogynistic transphobic but this is my point.

[Ian Crossland]

These, these right wing watch groups and leftist groups consider Muslims left wing despite the fact they're religious. Fundamental.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Anyway, anyway, we'll talk about this in the members.

[Ami Kozak]

One more thing on Qatar though. We need to keep our eyes on Qatar with, especially with their mass media project, Al Jazeera. They have a ton of influence and they're using it to undermine our values here in the West. I think it's just something to keep.

[Phil Labonte]

They employ Medi.

[Ami Kozak]

They'll hold us to double standards. AJ Talk about our human rights violations. Won't mention Qatar.

[Ian Crossland]

Let's grab, let's grab some more super chats. We've got Craig Charlton says Bondi should appoint Matt Gaetz as special counsel. That's a good idea. And maybe, maybe that happens.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

With. With Cash potentially being deputy director. So he doesn't. If he doesn't need to be confirmed for that. Is that what it is?

[Ami Kozak]

Yes, he does.

[Ian Crossland]

Then Mike Rogers might be a figurehead and then Cash actually gets to run the show. I mean, maybe. I think, I think Trump wants Cash and I think the reason he's wait is because he's like they're going to, they're going to launch attacks against them. How do we do this? Maybe that's the play.

[Ami Kozak]

Maybe they let Rogers in the scene seat for a year or so. Trump eventually gets rid of him and it looked like, oh, the deputy. Now he's been serving for over a year. Is it time to promote him?

[Ian Crossland]

He'll be acting director.

[Tim Pool]

He's balanced. We got Cash and like non remotely inflammat. That guy. I don't see any problem with him being.

[Ami Kozak]

I think the left paints him as a guy who would go after like a retribution type character is how he's viewed on the left.

[Ian Crossland]

All right, let's go. Saravia says DJT can draft invaders for war in Ukraine, asserting jurisdiction over them. Invaders will self deport. Donald J. Trump will get sued. SCOTUS will rule. Invaders and their children are not under US Jurisdiction. Maga.

[Ami Kozak]

Is he speaking about illegals? That is.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. Illegal. So I mean Democrats want that. Democrats have been saying we should conscript undocumented migrants to grant as a path to citizenship in the fall.

[Tim Pool]

Too many empires.

[Ian Crossland]

Yep.

[Phil Labonte]

Through military service.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. We had a way to grow your.

[Tim Pool]

Empire, but once your empire is established, it's kind of like asserting your downfall. Bringing in foreigners and then elevating them to position of citizenship without like assimilation through generations.

[Ian Crossland]

All right, Death magnet says on the topic of college educated, just because you're educated doesn't mean you're intelligent. There's a viral clip going around where this woman is like, she was saying something like, all of the liberal areas are from people who have college degrees.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And she's like, did it ever occur to them it's because people with degrees are smarter and so that's why they're voting that way or whatever? And it's like, dude, listen, I gotta tell you, if you took out 40 to 80 thousand dollars in loans to get a degree, that's not gonna get you a job and you can't pay them back, and 25 years later, you're still in debt. I'm not gonna call you intelligent or educated. I'm gonna say you were a rube. A rube.

[Tim Pool]

They are very low interest loans though, though. They're like 3% interest. So if you need 20 grand and you're in college, it's way better.

[Ami Kozak]

20 grand?

[Ian Crossland]

Yes. My, my point is, it's a very stupid thing to do.

[Elad Eliyahu]

How are they low interest loans? And at the same time people are saying that they'll pay back their entire principal and still owe.

[Ian Crossland]

It's because they're paying the minimums.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Elad Eliyahu]

And so are they really only like 3%, I believe.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, they're dirt cheap loans.

[Ian Crossland]

But. But dirt cheap. The problem is you take out 40, let's say 50k in loan loans, you get out, you can't find a job, you go work at Starbucks. You're like, well, I got to defer my loans again. And it keeps racking up and racking up. That's why these people, look, if you can't go to Florida, go to college. You shouldn't.

[Phil Labonte]

Intelligence is different than wisdom.

[Ian Crossland]

That's right. So I'll tell you what I did. Hey, let's talk about this. When I was 14, I stopped going to conventional high school and started getting homeschooled. I completed the entire high school course. We were doing two weeks of high school courses in one day, and it was a waste of my time. I completed all of my credits, submitted them, and then they said, if you would like to get your diploma and formally graduate high school, I said, they said, submit a letter, writing it out for your, you know, your final. I said, nah, not interested. And my dad got mad at me for not doing it, but I was like, what do I need? This is stupid. And then I went to a community college because you don't need a high school diploma to do it. And then I had some college on all of my applications and I did. I Had like two credits or something. And, and what happened was when I turned 18, I started looking at the math and I said, okay, how much is going to cost me to go to college? What do I need? And my dad was like, you definitely got to go to college. My mom said, you got to go to college. And then I said, wow, if I go get a job right now. I ended up reading this article from an economist who worked in the Bush administration who said, if you go to any investor and say, make an investment over four years and when you leave, you will owe me $40,000 with, you know, 3 or 4% interest, they would laugh in your face since it's the stupidest thing I ever heard. So what you should do is at 18 is get any job you can and work there for two to four years and save up as much money as you can and then consider if you want to advance. But the reality is if you do a job at McDonald's at 18 and worked for four years, four years later on average, and I can't remember the math at the time, but it was like, and this is 20 something years ago, 20 years ago actually. And it was like you'd be making 24,000, $25,000 a year. You are leaving after at 22, you are going to have, you know, $20,000 in savings. @ this rate, you are going to be an assistant manager making $2 more with an opportunity for moving up in other companies. You could reapply somewhere else, get training in advance. If you leave college at 20, 22, you're 40k in debt with no work history, no experience. You're only going to be able to get an entry level job somewhere. Most likely, if you can, your salary prospects will likely be lower and it'll take you an average of 10 years to climb out of that debt, where the person who worked at McDonald's is going to be net worth positive the moment they take the job, on average. And this was a few years ago we talked about in the show, the average net worth of a 30 year old in this country is $1,000. It is the first time in the life of a millennial that they actually had a positive net worth. So these women who are like, this lady's like, I'm gonna go to college because I'm smart, smart. And you got these, these stats where it's like, men aren't graduating college and women are. It's because men are doing the math.

[Tim Pool]

You know what looks really promising is the Peterson Academy, the Jordan Peterson.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, you know yes, super cheap.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, exactly.

[Phil Labonte]

I would say Michael Mouse, step into the abyss.

[Tim Pool]

There he is. Malice has did a course on the history of communism, I think just recently. That's super cheap.

[Ian Crossland]

So what is Peterson Academy? It's like a. I wish I could.

[Tim Pool]

Sell it, I don't know, class online school basically. And it's not accredited, but it gives you everything you need to get a college education. And it's cheap and it's through legitimate people like Jordan Peterson, Michael Malice, or are you going to say something to Phil about it?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Michael Malice is on the Soviet Union.

[Tim Pool]

On the Soviet Union the Rise Masterclass.

[Phil Labonte]

But like in his. In. In the world of various subjects.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Look, if you've ever seen the Tom Morello masterclass, Jordan Peterson is not selling anything like that.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, yeah. Yes. I mean the idea is like an online university that actually teaches you how to think and not what to think. It gives you stuff you won't get at the, at the neo Marxist postmodernist universities, you know.

[Ian Crossland]

But does he believe in dragons?

[Tim Pool]

Oh, I hope so.

[Phil Labonte]

Of course. But mythologically, yeah. Those that challenge your mythological truth is just as valuable to the West.

[Ian Crossland]

I met Jordan a few weeks ago.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

And we talked about having him coming on the show. He did briefly join us when we were on election night.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

But he's. I said we do Tim cast IRL or the culture war. IRL is topical news stories. Culture war is long free form discussion. He goes, the culture war seems like it's the good idea.

[Phil Labonte]

And I've been in it, you know, so it's not simple. It's not, you know, and.

[Ian Crossland]

But he was, he was basically saying like he and I having a philosophical. Philosophical conversation on how we see the world. And then, you know, I think he could teach me a lot of things and throw a lot of things at me, which would be really interesting. And I was like, that sounds like.

[Phil Labonte]

A really great Psychoanalyzed by Jordan.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. We gotta have Ian there for sure. Because I think Jordan Peterson might get flustered and confused and Ian might win.

[Tim Pool]

I'll let, I'll calm him down.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, I don't mean I'm not saying when, as in like Ian will come up with a more cohesive sense of reality. It's that Jordan Peterson will not understand how to navigate the ideas Ian's throwing at him.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Ian will break Jordan Peterson.

[Tim Pool]

He had such a good time on election broke.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Dr. Peterson.

[Phil Labonte]

I'm glitching, you know, Ian, I don't know how to answer that.

[Tim Pool]

He's really one of my favorite people on earth. He's such an amazing, inspirational dude, man.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. I'll tell you, the done well for me too. But there are a lot of people that I've met who I don't know if they're politics. And it's like some people I know. Yeah. And then they say, like they're huge fans of Jordan Peterson. And I'm like, oh, okay. You know, we're cool. They listen to the guy, they understand what he's trying to say. And the left has been trying to smear the guy relentlessly.

[Tim Pool]

And he wears banging suits.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, yes.

[Ami Kozak]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

When I met him, he had the dual color.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

You know, they're made for me half red. You know, it's for the fine line between order and chaos. When I saw him live in Miami, by the way, the first bet, the thing I noticed the most post was the lines out the door. And every kind of person you can imagine going to see Jordan Peterson. As much as you buy into this narrative that it's, you know, you know, lonely, incel white man. You know, it's actually everybody. It's all ages. It's like the most diverse crowd I've ever.

[Ian Crossland]

It's absolutely inspiring how powerful that like that voice is and how clarifying it is for so many people. It's a deeply impressive. Yeah, let's. Let's read this. We got Mary Evans says cash, FBI, Bongino, Secret Service, Brandon Herrera, ATF Director, Ken Paxton, AG Great addition to the Trump Justice League. Well, likely not Ken Paxton, but that would be a good idea. I do not see a reality where Dan Bongino takes Secret Service director. I've heard rumors already. Dan Bongino has the biggest live show in. I think he has the biggest live show, period.

[Tim Pool]

He got half a million live viewers during the election. Half a million.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. He regularly does like 170,000 concurrent viewers on his show. I don't know that. And so you can only estimate the amount of money he's making. I mean, IRL we do. We had 56, 57,000 tonight. We've been averaging around 60 or so. And people have a general idea of what we do. Bongino is doing triple that. I don't know how he gives that up for a 300, $400,000 a year. Not even that. It's probably 280,000 a year government job.

[Ami Kozak]

He has a bigger political impact in media using the bully pulpit than he would have as a Secret Service guy.

[Tim Pool]

But I could see him advising Secret Service for sure.

[Ami Kozak]

Sure. I think I think I'd see him advising something higher up the chain. Secret Service is important too, though. He obviously served as a secret.

[Ian Crossland]

George Washington was a Christian, Eric, but.

[Ami Kozak]

He didn't believe in callback. The what is it of Jesus Christ? The divinity of Jesus wouldn't be a Christian. So it's like maybe Matt Walsh could do what is a Christian next.

[Tim Pool]

That's a good idea.

[Ami Kozak]

As a Christian.

[Ian Crossland]

What is a Christian?

[Ami Kozak]

I didn't want everybody.

[Ian Crossland]

If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button? Subscribe to the channel and right now, if you haven't already, go to timcast.com, click join us, become a member because on the front page in a few, in about a minute, we're going to have the members only uncensored show. And it will say uncensored show and not so family friendly, but always fun and funny. And we usually go about 20 minutes on the uncensored segment before we jump into you guys as members calling in and talking to us and our guest. So we'll have more debates and more conversations and they'll be a little un family friendly, but as I mentioned, fun. So smash that like, like button. Share the show with everyone. You know, word of mouth really does help out. So if you like the show, tell people about it. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Amity, do you want to shout anything out?

[Phil Labonte]

It was great to be here. Great talking to everybody. Love the conversation. And yeah, if anybody wants to find me, I'm on Twitter at Amiko, on Instagram @aj-comedy and YouTube @aj-comedy as well.

[Tim Pool]

And yeah, you got a comedy special out.

[Phil Labonte]

Comedy special now. Lots of. I perform stand up all over New York City and, you know, stuff coming out.

[Tim Pool]

I'd love to see one of your comedies.

[Ian Crossland]

Thank you.

[Tim Pool]

So hot.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, yeah, maybe I'll do like a Peterson Tour or Alex Jones Tour or RFK Jr. A variety show with everybody coming out. Come, come to my show. It's gonna be amazing. Where to turn the frogs gay.

[Tim Pool]

When's your next show? Live show.

[Phil Labonte]

Keep up. Following me up, follow on my social media. I post dates there regularly, so that's the best way to do it. Got a podcast called Ami's House Band, Distant cousins. You could check all that stuff out.

[Ami Kozak]

Absolutely. Ami, it's been very fun talking to you guys. Trump supporters do not despair. Although Gates did have to withdraw, there's still a lot to be optimistic for and a lot of big things coming with the Trump administration. My name is Aloud Eliyahu. I'm a journalist here at Timcast News. You can find me at Twitter at all Yahoo and then on Instagram. Barely informed with a lot. Ian.

[Tim Pool]

Resident alien Ian Crossland reporting in for duty. Hello, everyone. Teleporting in from the Ethos Fear. Good to be here. I like to make up words, in case you didn't know, like Shakespeare.

[Ian Crossland]

I read a lot of that.

[Tim Pool]

Hey, follow me at Ian Crossland. Have a beautiful night. Take care of yourself. Heal your body, let yourself regenerate and you'll have a better day tomorrow.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I am Phil that remains on Twix. You can go and subscribe to me there. I am Phil that Remains official on Instagram. The band is all that remains. You can follow us on or you can check out our new videos, Forever Cold let you go know tomorrow and Divine. They're all available on YouTube. You can hear our music on Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora and Deezer. And don't forget, the left lane is for crime.

[Ian Crossland]

We will see you all [e-mail] in about one minute. Don't miss it. We'll see y'all there.