Trump Announces 25% Tariff On ALL CARS, Canada Begins MASS LAYOFFS Over Tariffs w/ Sharyl Attkisson

Summary

Timcast IRL Podcast Episode Summary Episode: Trump Announces 25% Tariff On ALL CARS, Canada Begins MASS LAYOFFS Over Tariffs w/ Sharyl Attkisson Release Date: March 27, 2025

---

Introduction: Trump’s New Car Tariffs and Economic Implications

At the outset of the episode, host Tim Pool announces a significant policy shift by former President Donald Trump: an additional 25% tariff on all imported cars. Pool highlights the corporate media's immediate negative reaction, labeling it as an escalation of the trade war. He contrasts this with Trump's complementary announcement to open multiple auto plants in the United States, particularly in Indiana, suggesting a strategic move to bolster domestic manufacturing.

Notable Quote:

Tim Pool [00:22]: "Donald Trump has just announced an additional 25% tariff on all imported cars... We're also seeing these viral posts where liberals are getting angry because prices are coming down."

Impact on the US Automotive Industry

Pool delves into the potential benefits of the tariffs for the American auto industry. He argues that the increased tariffs will level the playing field for domestic manufacturers by making imported cars more expensive, thereby encouraging consumers to purchase American-made vehicles. This, he asserts, will lead to job creation and economic growth within the sector.

Canadian Workforce Layoffs Amid Tariff Pressures

The discussion shifts to Canada, where the imposition of tariffs has resulted in mass layoffs within the steel and aluminum industries. Pool criticizes Canadian responses, portraying them as unfair demands for free trade between the two nations. He emphasizes Trump's focus on prioritizing American workers over international business relationships.

Notable Quote:

Tim Pool [02:30]: "Canada... getting mass layoffs... Why would we give those jobs to Canada? Now you guys have no jobs anymore. That was you getting sold out."

Guest Insight: Cheryl Atkisson on Tariffs and Economic Strategy

Cheryl Atkisson, a seasoned journalist and host of "Full Measure," joins the conversation to provide a nuanced analysis of the tariffs. She underscores the immediate positive economic activities spurred by Trump's policies and addresses concerns about short-term economic pain. Atkisson cites Trump's preference for job creation over mere financial gains, reinforcing the administration's commitment to revitalizing American manufacturing.

Notable Quote:

Cheryl Atkisson [07:34]: "President Trump... admitted what he would rather have of the two is not the tariffs. If it would simply just produce more jobs here."

Media Bias and the Corporate Press’s Portrayal of Trump

A significant portion of the episode critiques the corporate media's antagonistic stance towards Trump. Pool expresses intense frustration with how mainstream outlets portray Trump's policies as detrimental, labeling such coverage as opinion-based rather than factual reporting. He advocates for a more balanced understanding of the tariffs' benefits for American consumers and workers.

Notable Quote:

Tim Pool [05:18]: "I could not hate the corporate press more. This is not a news story. This is an opinion piece meant to make you hate Donald Trump."

Economic Theories and Long-Term Implications

The panel discusses the broader economic theories underpinning the tariffs, including the potential for increased competition within the US market and the reduction of reliance on foreign manufacturers. Ian Crossland introduces concepts like the materials revolution and the incorporation of advanced technologies (e.g., graphene and hydrogen fuel) into American car manufacturing, positioning the tariffs as a catalyst for innovation and modernization.

Notable Quote:

Ian Crossland [12:18]: "It's a good time to revitalize your national industry because of the materials revolution we're going through with discoveries like graphene..."

Secondary Topics: Media Manipulation, Mental Health, and International Relations

Beyond tariffs, the episode touches on various other topics:

• Media Manipulation: The hosts discuss potential strategies by the Trump administration to manipulate media narratives, including leaking pre-scripted messages to favorable journalists.

• Mental Health Crisis: Cheryl Atkisson and other guests highlight the growing mental health issues, attributing them to factors like poor diet and societal stressors.

• International Relations: The conversation briefly explores Trump's provocative statements about the British Commonwealth and Greenland, analyzing their geopolitical implications and public reception.

Notable Quote:

Tim Pool [30:22]: "I don't actually want Canada. It's cold. But Greenland's different story."

Controversial News Stories: Tesla Ramming Incident and Police Misconduct

The episode also covers shocking news stories, including:

• Tesla Ramming Incident: A viral video depicts a man intentionally ramming parked Teslas with a homemade four-wheeler, leading to discussions about public safety and mental health.

• Police Chief Misconduct: Reports emerge of a North Bergen police chief accused of defecating in the office and drugging officers with Viagra, raising concerns about police department integrity and administrative oversight.

Notable Quote:

Cheryl Atkisson [42:29]: "...this is mental illness. The stuff that you're seeing. These people are mentally ill..."

Advanced Technologies and Ancient Mysteries: Giza Pyramids Exploration

In an intriguing segment, Ian Crossland discusses recent claims of a vast, hidden city beneath the Giza Pyramids in Egypt. The conversation explores theories about ancient technologies, such as:

• Telluric Currents: Hypothetical earth currents that could have been harnessed by ancient civilizations for energy.

• Advanced Structures: Speculations about granite structures acting as power nodes or Tesla coils, suggesting that the pyramids may have served as ancient power sources.

Notable Quote:

Ian Crossland [67:08]: "They could be tapping into what's called the telluric current... Tesla was obsessed with tapping into the Earth's telluric current to produce power."

Fluoride in Drinking Water: Legal and Health Perspectives

The podcast addresses the contentious issue of fluoridation in public water supplies. Cheryl Atkisson discusses a recent federal court ruling in California that challenges the EPA's endorsement of fluoride, citing potential health risks. The conversation critiques the industry-driven propaganda that has historically promoted fluoride as beneficial, arguing for more transparent and science-based policies.

Notable Quote:

Cheryl Atkisson [76:03]: "The court agreed there's overwhelming scientific evidence as to the risks and dangers of fluoride in water."

Concluding Thoughts: Political Dynamics and Community Engagement

As the episode wraps up, the hosts reflect on the changing landscape of American politics, particularly the internal struggles within the Democratic Party and the perceived resilience of Republican strategies under Trump's influence. They encourage listeners to engage actively in political discourse and community building through platforms like Discord and Rumble.

Closing Remarks:

Tim Pool [93:24]: "Tell your friends about Tim Cast IRL can save their lives... Join the Tim Cast Discord server."

---

This episode of Timcast IRL offers a comprehensive analysis of Trump's latest tariff policies, their economic ramifications, and the broader political and social issues intertwined with these developments. Featuring insightful contributions from Cheryl Atkisson, Tim Pool and his co-hosts navigate through complex topics with a critical eye towards media representation and governmental policies, providing listeners with a detailed perspective on current events.

Transcript

[Tim Pool]

Donald Trump has just announced an additional 25% tariff on all imported cars. And the corporate press says he is ratcheting up the trade war. This will be interesting. He also announced it's going to be the opening of a bunch of auto plants in the country, namely in Indiana. So it seems like things are working. We're also seeing these viral posts where liberals are getting angry because prices are coming down. Oh, gas prices are down. Egg prices are down. Come on, guys. Isn't this the way it's supposed to go? Now, Canada, we got this report that they're laying off hundreds of workers in the steel and aluminum industries because of the tariffs. And this is why they were whinging, because they think that they deserve to do business with us to the benefit of Canada. Well, Trump is saying, I want the American people to do better. That's what we're getting. So let's talk about that. Should be interesting. But also, you know, that signal story won't go away. There's more developments, but I'm going to double down on, you know, my view of this, that I think the Trump admin likely knew what they were doing for a variety of reasons. We've got a viral video showing a woman, a pro Palestinian activist, being having a couple guys grab her. We don't know exactly what's going on, but guys in hoodies grab her, saying they're the police. And the assumption is this is immigration picking up US Visa holders who are here in support of Palestinian causes. That story and stories like it have disappeared from the news cycle, largely because the only thing anyone's talking about is that a signal message leaked. Head over to cast brew.com buy some coffee. Ian's graphine dream is back, baby. We've already. He's already sold what, 400 bags? I think Sheamus should be offended. He sold 300 one day. But I don't know that we have enough in stock because it's still sold out. So it was a small batch, but we've got more coming in. I don't know how you do it, Ian. I don't know how you do it, my friends. Don't forget to also smash that, like, button. Share the show with everyone you know. If you really do like the show, sharing really does support our work the most because that's how podcasts grow. Word of mouth. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Tim Cast. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Cheryl Atkinson.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Hello. So good to be here. It's been three years or something. Like that.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. Well, who are you? What do you do?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Why am I here at Said Admiral Stockdale? You guys, you're too young. Never mind too young, I guess. Well, I'm the host managing editor of the Sunday TV show Full Measure, which is going into its 11th year next fall. And unlike the other news organizations, we're seeing on ABC and cbs, Fox, depending on where you live, unlike other news organizations, our viewership is going through the roof this year as we continue to bring sort of under reported stories and off narrative stories. And I have a new book, follow the How Big Pharma Misleads, Obscures and Prevails.

[Tim Pool]

Well, right on. Should be fun. Thanks for hanging out.

[Ian Crossland]

You have an X account? I was looking for it.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Have an X account. Cheryl Aisson and a substack that I'm starting to get pretty active on.

[Phil Labonte]

Awesome.

[Ian Crossland]

Good to see you, man. It has been a while. I'm back as well. Ian crossing in the house and I'll.

[Tim Pool]

Tell you how I do it.

[Ian Crossland]

Tim, I'll tell you how I sell that coffee. It's with love. And I figured out according to the Greeks there were eight types of love.

[Tim Pool]

Okay, here we go.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, there's erotic love, there's love of family, there's friendship, there's love of self. I do it with all of them.

[Tim Pool]

Someone suggested we make a T shirt of that and all of our coffees. It's actually a really good idea. So instead it won't. It'll just be the actual art. So you'll have the Ian floating in the middle. Ooh, yeah. That's a chakra.

[Ian Crossland]

Still coffee for every chakra.

[Tim Pool]

Okay, Ian.

[Ian Crossland]

Hey, Tim. Love you. Hi, Phil. How you doing, baby?

[Phil Labonte]

I'm doing all right. Hello, everybody. My name is Phil Labonte. I'm the lead singer the heavy metal band all that Remains. I'm an anti communist and a counter revolutionary. Let's go.

[Tim Pool]

Here's the story from ABC news. Trump announces 25% tariffs on imported cars, ratcheting up global trade war. They say that major stock indexes closed down on Wednesday. I love that because it's not related to the news. But the corporate press always has to make sure that everything Trump does is wrong. So they're going to include that sub pattern. Quote, I think our automobile industry will flourish like it hasn't before. Trump said the auto tariffs are set to target a sector that employs more than a million US workers and relies on a supply chain closely intertwined with Mexico and Canada. Terrorists place in the auto industry risk raising car prices for US Consumers experts previously told ABC News, I despise these people so much, I don't want to start swearing right away. But I could not hate the corporate press more. I could not hate. Hate them more. This is not a news story. This is an opinion piece meant to make you hate Donald Trump. A news story would say, Trump announces 25% tariffs on imported cars. Here's a quote, end of story. Instead, every opportunity they get, they inject some stupid nonsense about how Trump is bad. Trump is bad. It's bad for you. The reality is this is good for you. It's good news. It's going to make your cars cheaper. It's going to give people jobs in this country, and it's going to cut off the freeloaders who been mooching off US Men. The corporate press really gets me going. But to be fair, I'm the one who chose that news story.

[Ian Crossland]

This is. So they're saying that all imports, like with steel or rubber or anything that are coming from other countries are now going to be charged. Is that what this. Like, what's going to get tariffed here?

[Tim Pool]

The cars.

[Ian Crossland]

The cars themselves.

[Tim Pool]

Cars themselves. So the idea is, you know, let's take a foreign car manufacturer. I'll use. I'll use a random one. We'll just. We'll just make up a fake one. We'll call it Crossland cars. And they manufacture in China. China. And the company has a base of operations in the US they make their cars in China, ship them here, import them, and then sell them to the American people. So they're using slave labor in China to make the car. Slave labor. Like, they're getting paid nothing. They have no health benefits, there's smog and smut everywhere, and they're walking off their buildings in mass suicide. Fox kind of get the point. You can't compete. The American worker can't compete with that. So these companies are like, we pay five bucks an hour. If we were going to hire these people in America, we have to pay them 50. It's too much, too expensive. Trump says, we put a tariff on those cars as soon as they. If that company tries to bring those cars in, they're going to have to pay 25% extra to import it. So that's the American base of operation, paying for it to come in. But these are companies operating in foreign countries, effectively selling to the American worker, extracting our labor force and our manufacturing base. What happens now is this 25% tariff will do two things. American auto manufacturers now get an opportunity to compete. They now have 20, a 25% margin to work with, because they're going to say anything you make your car for is going to be more expensive by virtue of the tariff. So if we can't lower our prices below a certain amount. So put it this way. Let's say Chinese car costs ten grand. An American car costs fifteen. The American car manufacturer says it's impossible to get that cost lower by putting a tariff on those cars. Maybe not 1500, but let's say. Let's say 1250. It now evens the playing field for the auto manufacturer in the US Because a Chinese manufacturer has to increase their costs to offset the cost of the tariffs coming in. They claim the cost is to you. But when it allows American companies to compete, this actually can bring prices down because the foreign manufacturers are forced to lower their prices. More importantly, it will create more economic activity. More people who have worked there will be a greater volume of cars sold from the United States with more people who have jobs. That's how costs come down. They're lying to you. They are evil, and they want to destroy this country's working class.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

And President Trump, I interviewed him a couple of weeks ago, and he admitted what he would rather have of the two is not the tariffs. If it would simply just produce more jobs here. In other words, if both sides drop the tariffs because they've been tariffing us without us equally tariffing them back, that would be fine. If they would drop the tariffs and just have more cars built here. He said he'd rather have the jobs here than the money, but he said the money's good, too.

[Phil Labonte]

Do you have the sense that if Trump's plan works out, do you think that the effect is gonna be, you know, that there will be a return of jobs, or do you think that it's gonna be something, do you think is gonna end up actually kind of like, you know, harpooning the economy?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Well, I'm not an economist, but we already have trillions of dollars of promised economic activity here in this country since Trump was elected. As a result, in part of the tariffs, maybe not entirely. Some of it is simply because he got elected and they see a better environment. But there is some direct activity linked to the tariff announcements already, which is what he predicted. I don't see how that's a bad thing. Now. One thing I questioned him about, is there going to be a period of pain in the short term because there will be belt tightening that has to be done or an immediate impact before the job? And impact is felt here because it's going to take time to build factories and so on. He pushed back on that and said no, he thinks that the economic benefit will be felt almost immediately because even as they're building the plants that starts almost right away.

[Phil Labonte]

That was actually going to be a follow up that I. Do you think that the, the economic activity that's going to be spurred, do you think that is going to take effect in time to protect the Republicans in the midterms?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Gosh, that's a great question. No idea. No idea.

[Ian Crossland]

They're looking at like Chinese company wants to sell in the U.S. so it's, they're going to have to either raise their prices, which means that American car companies are going to be relatively cheaper, which means they're going to get money and then that's going to enhance American companies. Then they'll hire more people, build more plants. That's going to happen over time. Initially China, China is going to be like, well, if we stop shipping our cars over the US because they're screwing us with tariffs, we lose 700 billion. If we just now charge more and we have to cut, eat that cost in loss or in expenditure, we'll make 500 billion.

[Tim Pool]

So it's like also consider this. You're right. But also consider this. Let's say a car costs 20 grand in the United States and their margin is 10% and China makes a car for 15 grand, sells it here for 20 grand matching the market price of American made cars. They get a massive margin where they're, they're extracting profit by using cheap labor. The putting that tariff on it will strip their profit margins down.

[Ian Crossland]

I would be, I guess there's a concern that if the, if the Chinese manufacturers raise their prices to keep up with tariffs, then the American companies will also raise their prices to keep up with other way because they can.

[Tim Pool]

The way around the foreign companies will not be able to compete with cheaper American products. So the idea with 25% tariff is that the foreign product needs to cost more than the American product and then that basically they're going to have to drop their prices to compete with us. So if, if it ends up costing them more to make it, they're not going to raise their prices. This is what the left keeps saying, they're just going to raise the prices and pass to the consumer. No it isn't. Take a look at our coffee company. So if we have Kona coffee made in Hawaii and it's 10 bucks a bag and then someone imports from somewhere else for 8 bucks a bag and makes a $2 profit. They still have to compete with our cost. So if their price goes up from the tariffs, they either stop and we sell all American or they have to keep their prices down somehow to compete with the American costs that are already.

[Ian Crossland]

And they won't stop. It's a huge, huge sector of their economy, I imagine they won't stop. They have to, they have to continue to compete. Like economics, it's not about your emotions.

[Tim Pool]

You know, I got to be honest, I don't, I don't even care if the cars end up costing more money. You know why? Because this just means we're going to get our auto manufacturing base back in Indiana and Michigan and Ohio. And it means that, you know, if, Remember the documentary from the 90s from Michael Moore about the shuttering of these auto plants? What happened to those people? Now they're sitting here screaming that Donald Trump's the bad guy when he's trying to bring back that middle class life Americans used to enjoy. Now you've got Gen Z. They can't afford a place to live. They can't find any jobs. The jobs they can find. Pay dirt. Imagine this, Gen Z, Donald Trump does this. Next thing you know, an ad pops up, auto manufacturing job paying $60,000 a year entry level or you know, 40, 50,000 entry level. Now you have a chance to get these jobs. It's going to create competition in the American market. It's going to create opportunity for Americans to have these jobs. Trump's deportation, all of this combined is going to raise the standard of living for the American.

[Ian Crossland]

I feel like it's a, it's also a time in history when it's a good time to revitalize your national industry because of the materials revolution we're going through with like subatomic you discoveries. Graphene, obviously hydrogen fuel, like we could really, I mean even a new car company and a new American car company that is like hydrogen graphene based. If they could get the cost low, it's this, that's the opportunity that we have right now.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Here's a problem though that I think you guys talked about before we went live here. People don't understand tariffs. I'm not saying I understand better than everybody else because I don't. But I think their eyes glaze over and they're being fed by most of the media a tale, a store, a one sided story really about what all this means without anybody explaining it to them in the way you're trying to do. They're not getting a full picture of it. So they're going to associate anything bad that happens economically in the next month or so, for sure, with this threat of tariffs, when that may or may not be to blame for anything that happens.

[Tim Pool]

But all that matters is, I would probably say September of 2026. That's, that's, that's all that matters. Trump. Trump. Trump could literally do anything. Well, not literally, but he could do most things right now and get away with it.

[Phil Labonte]

Just so long as the economy is okay in 18 months. Well, September, 12 months from now, 12, 12, 16 months from now, just so long as the economy's okay, then the Republicans have a shot in, in the midterms. And if the Republicans actually do well in the midterms, then the President gets to continue his, you know, his, his agenda with, you know, at least not a hostile Congress that's going to try and impeach him every chance.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Don't you think they Republicans weirdly underperform, though, in recent history at times when they should excel, when we're looking at what they ought to be able to do in Congress.

[Phil Labonte]

Absolutely.

[Tim Pool]

What about, is it. I mean, we won. So one issue people keep bringing up is the, the census issue that over counted Democrat blue states in 2020, and that's going to get corrected in 2030, and we're going to see a massive, massive shift in terms of college, Electoral college seat, electoral college votes and congressional seats. So it's going to get real Interesting after 2030. So that midterm, I don't know. I don't know when the census actually kicks in for, for districts, but Ezra Klein basically lays it out, Bill Maher lays it out. Democrats, it's game over. They're never going to win again.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, I heard. So long party's splitting. Is that, have you guys heard much about that?

[Phil Labonte]

Well, they're fighting, that's for sure.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah. I mean, they're in.

[Ian Crossland]

They're like a Tea Party coming out. Yeah, the Democratic Party.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, they're fighting each other. My favorite was, we talked about this yesterday. That cat, Abu Ghazale. Abu Ghazali, Is that her name? She's got a keffiyeh on her wall in Illinois's 9th district, which has the highest density of Jews in Illinois. So all these people are coming out being like, she's, she keeps talking about she's a progressive, she's going to primary the incumbent Democrat. And she's like, I'm not gonna use a consultant. We don't need any of these grifter class consultants. And it's like lady, you needed one to be like, you are trying to run for Congress in the densest Jewish population in Illinois, and you have a keffiyeh behind you. Her dad's Palestinian. I don't think she can win, but I certainly hope she runs. I hope AOC props her up. I hope all of the squad and the left progressives prop her up, because it will make all the moderate Democrats recoil and run to Donald Trump.

[Ian Crossland]

I'm open to seeing, like, the slithering, you know, vestige of whatever that Democratic Party had become, you know, kind of fade away because it was just big bureaucracy controlled. And I don't know even know if most of them even realize that they've been part of that. But, you know, inevitably, I'd like to see it fade away, whether or not, like, what's coming next. I guess that's a big.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

The biggest thing. They let the opportunity slip away during this transition where so many people on the traditional left started to merge with people on the right when it came to Covid issues. They still differ on key things like RFK Jr may not agree with a lot of conservatives on environmental issues, but on issues that they have deemed to be now more important and more impactful to their families, they have come together. And Kennedy wanted to work with the Democrat Party, as, you know. You know, a lot of these Democrats who've broken away wanted to work with the Democratic Party and were rejected, or the fate might have been totally different if those forces had joined on the left instead of on the right.

[Phil Labonte]

Do you think that that's going to be a phenomenon moving forward? Because we, you know, we talk about the kind of the civil war that's happening in the. In the Democrat Party between the actual progressives and the far left. And Tim was talking about some polling numbers that said the, the very far left and the like, 30% want to keep it what they're doing. Some think that the Democrats didn't go far enough, but there was a significant portion and probably a third that thought that they went too far and that was why they. They lost. Those people seem not ready to, you know, come over to vote for Republicans yet. But with the. The historic unpopular situation that the Democrats have, it, is it your sense that that's going to be something moving forward or.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I think it's a problem for them, the doubling down. I mean, that's a legitimate position for some people to take, that this is our true purpose and this is what we ought to do. But that's starting to look more and more fringe, and they see that they have, you know, Republicans have peeled off important support because of that, and I think that's going to continue. I was getting calls on C SPAN the other day. They have, I don't know if, you know, a Democrat line, Republican line and Independent line. They take calls. The Democrats sounded like Republicans when they were calling in and asking about media issues and the things I cover with the health and science stuff. And everybody sounded like they were almost on the same page and it was more on the middle or middle leaning to conservative side, even these Democrats who are calling in. So I think, I think that's a bad signal for them.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, back in the 80s, there used to be conservative Democrats and, and, you know, there were, there were Democrats that would actually be conservative, at least by their standards.

[Ian Crossland]

Do you.

[Phil Labonte]

I don't, I don't think that that's out of the question anymore, is it?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Well, I just think they're feeling more and more alienated. If they are. Yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

I'm wondering if, I'm wondering if the Democrats that don't want to be associated with the far left are going to become, are going to quit. Are they going to be like the Blue Dog Democrats like they used to be?

[Tim Pool]

Manchin quit.

[Phil Labonte]

Joe Manchin, he was, he's not the only one. Kristen Sinema is fairly moderate and she's. She didn't quit?

[Tim Pool]

No. She quit the Democratic Party.

[Phil Labonte]

Did she quit the Democratic Party?

[Tim Pool]

Yes.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, I didn't.

[Tim Pool]

A long time ago? Yes. Was it like two, two years ago she quit?

[Ian Crossland]

There's a desire to want to.

[Tim Pool]

Jeff Van Drew quit. But, like, if you're a Democrat and you are trying to be moderate in any way, you cannot win.

[Ian Crossland]

You cannot have super delegates.

[Tim Pool]

It's so crazy.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, that's override control their candidate.

[Tim Pool]

That's, that's for president. We're talking about everyone else. Let's jump to the story from the New York Post. Hundreds of Canadian steelworkers hit with layoffs as Trump's tariffs squeeze the industry. How's it going, Canada? What are you going to do about it? You do not get our business for free. That's just it. If, if the Canadians came out and they were just like, Trump, your tariffs are totally fine. Thank you and have a nice day. I would have been like, that was very, that was very honorable. Instead, they got all hissy and pissy, threatened to cut off our electricity to the, to the areas that, that use electricity, you know, in the northeast part of the country. And they wanted to make it a big thing. They were slighted, as if they are. They deserve our business. Well, this is what you get, Canada. This is what I've been talking about. So we've got at least 200 Canadian members of the United Steelworkers, North America's largest private sector union, lost their jobs thus far, according to Marty Warren, the group's national director. And Canadian companies have not been shy about placing the blame on Trump's stiff tariffs, a 25% levy imposed on all steel and aluminum imports. I'm going to say this, I feel bad for anybody who loses their job. But Canada, if you lost your job because you were dependent upon American business, that was a mistake on your country's part to put everything on the line in terms of an international negotiation, yet no guarantees. And the American people have been exploited and are fed up. And they said, we're not interested in this anymore. We need to manufacture our own steel, our own aluminum. So why would we give those jobs to Canada? Now you guys have no jobs anymore. That was you getting sold out. This is Trump correcting and taking care of his own people. Maybe your country should do the same for you.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

And he's doing this in part not because just of steel and aluminum. It's over the dairy tariffs, something like 260% in Canada that they're marking up if you want to sell milk, apparently. And the way we can get them is not, is getting them with something they want to sell here in the US What I don't get is what's so controversial about that here in America. It's not as though we're rolling in dough. We have a deficit and a debt and so many needs going on here to say that we deserve to make sure that we're doing the best economically for our people and we're doing these reciprocal tariffs or inviting businesses to do more manufacturing here. What's controversial about that?

[Ian Crossland]

I think people don't understand the level of debt. I think it's just kind of like the wool's been pulled over. Most, like most people don't know there's a US debt clock where you can watch the 36 trillion just go up, up, up. And we've over 100 years actually since the, since, you know, 1949, CIA, after World War II, they basically created America as the tit for everyone else to get their milk from. And no, in the British Empire, like in this whole five eyes organization. And we basically, it's just been accepted and people have now become accustomed to it. What's that?

[Phil Labonte]

You know, why?

[Ian Crossland]

Well, the Federal Reserve was very easy.

[Phil Labonte]

To, I mean you mentioned after World War II, do you know why the United States kind of became like, because.

[Ian Crossland]

It was the strongest military, because it.

[Phil Labonte]

Was because of nuclear nonproliferation, because the, the nuclear arms race. The United States didn't want to see every country in Europe all getting nuclear missiles because that would be, that would create, make a higher percentage chance of a nuclear war happening. So the US Said, look, if you, if you don't go after a nuclear arms program, we will protect you. That's the whole point of NATO. So it wasn't like, it wasn't like, I mean, I know you talk about like the, the, the global economic order and stuff like that, but it was, the most of it was we don't want the world to blow itself up because of nuclear.

[Ian Crossland]

That was I think the American military aspect of the situation. But NATO economic aspect was they made America like the bank for all these.

[Phil Labonte]

Other commonwealth economic aspect came after was.

[Ian Crossland]

Called the liberal economic order.

[Phil Labonte]

But it came after NATO. NATO came first. They started building bases. They said, look, don't, don't develop nuclear weapons. We'll build bases, we'll protect you, we will take care of you to make sure, we'll defend you from the Russians. And the response after that was then you had economic interest, you had companies deciding, okay, well we can go into these places because they're secure, because the United States military protects them.

[Ian Crossland]

But also Canada now gets a huge discount from this country as it's being siphoned off. And one, if they violate NATO, they don't no longer get the American money. So there's all these incentives to stay on, to stay on board with this, this ethos of the liberal economic order and you're going to keep getting money. And Trump comes in, he's like, I'm done with this, I'm done with this. We're not.

[Tim Pool]

Let me just give you a simple argument on the tariffs thing. Donald Trump says to Canada very simply, we think our business is worth more. Instantly, they laugh. 200 workers. I think that shows that there was an incongruence between the markets, Canada and United States. And then they're getting a free, they're getting a freebie off us. If Donald Trump can go and say we're going to charge, we're going to charge you to sell your product in our country and that destroys your business. I think that that just says it was an unfair arrangement from the get go. If the market actually made sense, you'd be like, okay, but the reality was America doesn't need it. And so I'LL put it this way. Donald Trump wants American steel back. The Steelers in Pittsburgh remember that there's no steel in Pittsburgh anymore. Maybe a little bit. Trump wants to bring those jobs back and give Americans good lives. We sold it off at a discount rate to China. I'm sorry, to China and Canada. And Trump just said, you have to pay more. And instantly they're out of business. We were getting ripped off.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Well, here's something just in simple terms. We've had leaders that for decades have been telling us, the American public, as we're rowing a kayak toward a waterfall, that we're never going to hit the waterfall and we're just gliding that way. And no one has the strength or the ability to explain to the public or the desire that hard things need to be done so that bigger things can happen. And the reason is they're all getting paid. Republicans and Democrats alike are getting the donations from the industries to make sure they don't do these things. And it never gives you votes, hardly if you spend it.

[Phil Labonte]

In fact, it costs you votes. Because if you say, no, we really do need to do something about our deficit and deficit spending, then you end up with people saying, oh, look, they want a real grand. Throw grandma off a cliff. The Paul Ryan thing takes a lot.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Of morality on the part of a political figure. And not just short term thinking, of course, but they have to think short term in a way, because they have to get elected every two years, four years, six years or whatnot. So.

[Tim Pool]

Yep. No, I think the problem for this country is that if, if you were to be honest in politics, you'd lose in two seconds. You'd go up and you'd say something like, guys, if we continue at this economic rate, we are going to be bankrupt. This country will collapse. We need harsh economic reforms. This is going to lower the GDP by X amount of percent for the first two years. After that, we'll see stability. After that, we may see a recovery. People are going to say, nope, don't do it. Because most people would rather say, give me the short term gain. I don't care about the long term.

[Ian Crossland]

That's what this is in Canada, too. This entanglement of trade that we've found ourselves in is, is being disentangled and the result is people are dependent on it. Like normal people that don't think about politics. They're just used to going in and making steel and now they're losing their. So there is like this short term, and this is what short term pain literally is, is people losing Jobs.

[Phil Labonte]

Do you have any? Is it Canadian?

[Ian Crossland]

In the U.S. i mean I generally cared about humanity in general and like if, if national entanglements like that is, we're somewhat responsible for. I care, but I care, you know, long term. We have to think at least 20 years ahead if we're talking about economy.

[Tim Pool]

There are indeed. Yeah, there's U S Steel, there's Cleveland, Cliff Steel Dynamics, CMC Gordon, North America, jw. There's a lot, there's a lot of steel companies.

[Phil Labonte]

I heard I, I read somewhere that a lot of the, the steel manufacturers left the United States and I'm, I'm not sure where I heard, you know.

[Tim Pool]

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these companies are actually just importing from Canada or China or Mexico. And so they're American companies but they outsource the manufacturing somewhere else and distribute through the United States which is short term gain, long term losses.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

But here's the thing, almost like we don't even need them, but we've been doing them a favor by buying their stuff, you know, at an elevated rate at the expense of our own people under the idea that we need to.

[Ian Crossland]

Have siphoning American money to the British Empire.

[Tim Pool]

Man, you know the funniest thing about this is the left should be cheering Trump on 100% because these, the outsourcing of jobs and they used to. Remember the battle in Seattle? Remember that one? Remember that one, Ian? The battle in Seattle, 1999.

[Ian Crossland]

Quickly tell me.

[Tim Pool]

The World Trade Organization protests people, leftists were upset about the US cutting deals, much like the Trans Pacific Partnership. What ends up happening is the CEO of a big company and its shareholders say we can increase our profit margins by 10% if we outsource the jobs to Mexico where we don't gotta pay healthcare benefits. The American workers get fired, we make a bigger profit. It makes the rich richer and the middle class poor. The left was protesting this today. They're protesting against Trump's, they're pressing for it.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

If Trump had run as a Democrat and done these same initiatives, but run and won as a Democrat, would the Democrats be behind him now?

[Tim Pool]

Well, I actually, you know, there's a.

[Phil Labonte]

Thing that we talk about like if Donald Trump had, if the Democrats had approached Donald Trump and, and basically stroked.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

His ego, he absolutely would have run.

[Phil Labonte]

His, he would have done anything they.

[Tim Pool]

Wanted and they would have won. Yeah, Democrat 2016, Trump on the same exact platform because he shared a lot with Bernie Sanders. If, if he ran this, he was pro gay marriage. If he ran on that and Hillary Clinton wasn't. If he ran on that, the Republicans would have had. Who? Rubio? Jeb Bush?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, yeah, Jeb Bush.

[Tim Pool]

And then he would have won and the Republicans would have nobody. Right.

[Ian Crossland]

It's a big if because they have super delegates and they probably would have been like, hillary Clinton's our candidate everywhere.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Right.

[Tim Pool]

We get that. If they approached Trump and said. But that was the problem. Hillary Clinton, it was her turn. Trump's only move was as a Republican, also because of the sentiment of Occupy and Trump being a billionaire with Bernie Sanders as a left populist. No, no, no populous going to elect a billionaire on the right. However, the right populists were like, Trump's right. He knows how the machine works. It's benefited him. He's going to fight for us. The left just says millionaires and billionaires are bad.

[Ian Crossland]

It's interesting to think if he had run as a Democrat and they groomed him to be a Democrat, if he would have just become evil, like, become part of that machine. But they got.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

They didn't get to him very much the same. He's. He's not changed. If you look at him over the decades, he's not changed a lot about anything.

[Tim Pool]

Could you imagine Trump today like, if it Was inverted in 2016? He runs and he's going. You know, I just think sometimes a man is a lady. Thinking a lot about it.

[Phil Labonte]

He literally. I just retweeted. He made it. He was making remarks from. I forget where he was, but he was making remarks specifically saying, you'll never be a woman if you're a man.

[Tim Pool]

You.

[Phil Labonte]

Doesn't matter how many operations you get. I get. Just retweeted that just before the show started.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

When. When was he saying that? You mean today?

[Phil Labonte]

Like this afternoon? Well, it was 17 minutes ago. I retweeted. It was from four hours ago. Breaking 91 1. Put it up.

[Tim Pool]

I hope you guys are ready for this one, because the United States is going to go back into the Commonwealth. That's right. The United States will bend the knee to King Charles. Apparently, Donald Trump suffers MAGA backlash over commonwealth proposal. Hell no. So Donald Trump suggested he could accept any potential invitation from King Charles III to join the Commonwealth has led to one fan to warn you will lose 95% of your support base. I mean, the left hates him already. He would lose everyone else. The whole country would be unified.

[Phil Labonte]

I don't even know what he meant, because he couldn't have actually meant, yes, the United States.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I don't even know what they're Offering. I don't get it.

[Ian Crossland]

It's an honorary position, is why he would consider it. Because they're not officially becoming a parliamentary. You know, we're not going to get a king because of this. If you go in the Commonwealth, you could very easily end up with a king.

[Tim Pool]

So, Alex Jones, I've got a message for Donald Trump. If you really try to make America join The British Commonwealth, 1776 will commence again.

[Ian Crossland]

It's shocking. Like, King Charles. So, Alex, also, Alex Jones went on to say, like, maybe Trump's going to troll this guy. Like, have the king come over to the United States, sit in the Oval Office and be like, yeah, we're not joining the Commonwealth. Welcome to my house. Like, could be something like that. Trump's probably like, has no idea what he's about to do. And it's like toying with the idea. And when he hears people complaining and being like, you better not even consider putting this country under the authority of the British Empire. And he'll, he'll, he'll not.

[Tim Pool]

He'll step back. He will not. He will not do it.

[Ian Crossland]

Will not.

[Tim Pool]

Trump kind of just says stuff sometimes.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I think, likes to be provocative. He likes to do, you know, But.

[Tim Pool]

I wonder how much of what we're seeing with all these stories is just Trump manipulating the press. Like, seriously, Trump could, if, if, if there was a negative story about Trump, he could just fart and story's gone.

[Ian Crossland]

I like about him that'll say crazy stuff like this and think about it, like, just because it's a bad idea doesn't mean it's, like, wrong to think about it and to voice it. He thinks out loud a lot of times. I like that about him, actually, that he, like, God's a 51st state. What other crazy stuff? Oh, making Canada state, making Greenland.

[Tim Pool]

I mean, Maragaza.

[Ian Crossland]

Beautiful, beautiful. So, but it's up to us to keep him in check. When he says really, really bad ideas, we gotta be vocal about it.

[Tim Pool]

You know, he's an ideas guy, right? Just sometimes you got to throw him out there. And then people say, yeah, we don't. We're not going to do that one.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

But what I, what I like about the conversation is he's a big ideas guy. You look at, he's right about a lot of the stuff of the Panama Canal. I didn't know what was going on. We've had reporters down there for my show and try to look into it. He's right about some of it, but I would have thought the answers were sort of like, oh, let's negotiate so that they don't raise the fees so much and let's work with them on not letting the Chinese get so much control. And he's all about, let's take it back, you know, like the big idea. And it may, that may not happen, but the conversation gets going.

[Tim Pool]

Just take a look at this. Hard to see because Bloomberg's website sucks. Look at this beautiful picture. Look at this absolutely beautiful image. Wouldn't you want to just hang out there? Yeah, these beautiful homes. Yeah, that's Greenland. And Trump says it must be ours. Trump insists the US will, must own Greenland as Vance heads there. So we don't need the British Commonwealth, we need our own Commonwealth. We need our own Greenland.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

It's another big idea. Who would have thought it was funny?

[Tim Pool]

Because I guess Joe Rogan. I don't know, whenever Joe Rogan has a thought on something, the media reports it as a headline story. I guess they're bored. But we love you, Joe. And I guess he was saying he doesn't care for the Canada's a 51st state thing. Look, if Donald Trump is actually serious about Canada being the 51st state, I am, I'm not for that. I jokingly said we're going to seize it. And I got more death threats than I've ever gotten. I don't actually want Canada. It's cold. I don't mind it for vacation, to get poutine and go up. But Greenland's different story.

[Ian Crossland]

Canada had a revolution and they, the people were like, we want statehood, we want first amendment right. We want American constitutionalism. Like, I would support them, but I don't want any kind of like military seizure of British territory.

[Tim Pool]

Would you join the volunteer force to fight in the war of Canada?

[Ian Crossland]

I would be an information guy. I would, I would, I don't know, man, move data.

[Tim Pool]

I wouldn't, I wouldn't have any interest in anything to do with Ukraine. But if there was like calling all support, we're, we're taking Canada, I'd say, what can I do? I'm kidding. The Canadians are going to kill me.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, I mean the Canadians that I don't, I don't think, I mean it's a genuine conversation, you know, American. The idea of United States isn't insulated to this landmass. The idea of a bunch of states that are united could be global, it could be solar, could be multi, planetary.

[Tim Pool]

You know what the, the actual name of Mexico is?

[Ian Crossland]

United States of Mexico.

[Tim Pool]

Indeed it is.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. And so just extrapolate that idea like localized governance is the way to go. So you have.

[Phil Labonte]

That was.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Sounds so crazy when you first hear these things, especially if you're not read in like I'm not sometimes. But he was talking about Greenland his first term. It didn't get a lot of coverage. He was talking about doing this during his first term. And there's a method to it. There's a reason, strategic reasons that look pretty important, that make it look pretty smart.

[Phil Labonte]

Greenland. It's Denmark that actually Kingdom of Denmark.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

But we already have a lot of authority there given to us in a military sense.

[Phil Labonte]

That's because Denmark can't take care of it.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Right. We're responsible in part for their security. We already have presence there. They already rely on us in part for some things. There is a relationship that exists.

[Phil Labonte]

They actually had to take. We had to take stewardship of Greenland during World War II because Denmark couldn't protect Denmark from the Nazis. So instead. And we couldn't have the Nazis building a beachhead on our side on, you know, in our hemisphere.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

So we're still responsible for their protection.

[Phil Labonte]

The United. Well, I mean the United. The United States is the entity that keeps the entire North American continent safe. Right? So we talk about Canada. If you look at what Canada's military is actually comprised of, it is a joke. It is an absolute joke. They have almost nothing. They rely entirely on the United States for their defense. And the same thing goes for Greenland. Greenland. The reason Greenland has, you know, doesn't get taken by Russia is because of the United States. And anyone that says anything different is lying to you.

[Tim Pool]

You know, that is. That is interesting because now that I think about it, it's like the defund. The police, feminists and leftists, they don't understand that their ideology can only exist in a state that keeps you secure. If there was no, let's say the United States didn't exist and it was just a land mass, feminism wouldn't exist. There'd be barbarian gangs on motorcycles going around taking what they want. There would be small pocket communities that were run brutally. If we ever saw an actual economic like governmental collapse, yo, it's going to be the most brutal guys who take over. But because of the police and because of our system of laws which protect the rights of everybody, feminism and the far left are able to exist in the system. Canada is a good example of this. If the United States didn't exist, Canada wouldn't exist. Absolutely. Canada. I hope you hear this. If the US wasn't a psychotic war machine and there was literally nothing Here but a spattering of states. Canada would be occupied and taken over and, and all the, all someone else would come and claim the land mass. Canada's fringe far left garbage only exists because the US Won't tolerate anybody going near Canada.

[Phil Labonte]

Like right. So I'm, this is a, a meme that it's just a picture that I'm, that I'm looking at that I'm going to retweet right now. But Canada's active military, they have 1.9 active military per 1,000 people. The US have 4.

[Tim Pool]

4.

[Phil Labonte]

The Air Canada has 375 aircraft. The US has 13,209 75. 375 aircraft naval destroyers. Canada has 0. The United States has 75. The United States has 64 submarines. Canada has 4. The United States has 11 aircraft carriers. Canada has 0. Canada has 74 tanks. The United States has 4,657. There is no competition between the United States military and Canada. The reason Canada is a free country is because the United States wants candidates almost free.

[Ian Crossland]

Look up King of Canada. Like search it right now. King of Canada. It's Charles. Like they're there. He's their king. And they, you compare the British and Crossland. Well I will be one day.

[Phil Labonte]

I will be the British military. United States. It's, it's not quite as laughable, but it's still laughable.

[Ian Crossland]

Britain has no military. They're like, I mean not known to military. Britain has military, but they have insignificant compared to the United States along with what you're saying. And Canada is part of this United.

[Phil Labonte]

States military is larger than all of the rest of NATO, all of the rest of the country, all of NATO combined.

[Tim Pool]

You know I love this. You know the largest air force in the world is. Do you know who that's Air Force. Do you know who has the. So, so who has the largest Air Force? It's U.S. air Force.

[Phil Labonte]

United States.

[Tim Pool]

Do you know who has the second largest air force?

[Phil Labonte]

U. S. Navy.

[Tim Pool]

That's right. I kind of love that about this.

[Phil Labonte]

I love it. Absolutely.

[Ian Crossland]

I think it was that they were the largest. If the US Military was a corporation, it would be the largest polluter on the planet because it's just so much hot activity in the ocean. Just dumping, dumping, dumping all day. Burning global trade.

[Tim Pool]

Possible.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

If the U.S. navy wasn't patrolling the seas, pirates would take everything. I mean, come on, let's be real. If you got a cargo ship, like if there wasn't for the US Navy, there would just be pirates literally everywhere. And these ships would be armed to the teeth. And a lot of them are actually. But it's wild to me. You ever see those videos where the cargo ship just sprays water on these guys?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

The speedboats are pulling up and they blast them with water. They turn on the thing and water sprays off the sides. And I'm like, okay, I saw another video. You saw the one where they unload on the pirates.

[Ian Crossland]

I've seen a few of those.

[Tim Pool]

There's a viral video where the pirates are coming up and the dudes are just going like, I'm just shooting at.

[Ian Crossland]

Apparently there's a Russian tourism. This is what I heard this yesterday. Was it on this show you guys might have talked about where they. You can pay like $15,000 to go get on a Russian boat and sail where there's pirates. And if they come, you're allowed to open up?

[Tim Pool]

No.

[Phil Labonte]

What is what I heard previously? It was. I don't know what the show was, but it was Mark Cuban that was being.

[Ian Crossland]

Someone was telling your mom's house with Mark Cuban. Yeah, it was Christina Piti and Tom.

[Tim Pool]

Pirate hunting cruises. Hilarious Russian luxury yachts offer private hunting. Pirate hunting cruises from 2009. I don't know if it's real, but there you go. Wealthy punters pay fifteen hundred dollars per day to patrol the most dangerous waters, hoping to be attacked by raiders.

[Phil Labonte]

What the would you do.

[Ian Crossland]

Would you do that? I mean, that's a question they asked Mark Cuban because they'll fire back. You know, you're not like, yeah, they're going to be. You're going to have superior.

[Tim Pool]

That's terrible, man. I mean, I don't understand why you have to pay to go stop evil people.

[Ian Crossland]

No, it's like the inverse of hiring mercenaries.

[Tim Pool]

They figured it out. They were like, guys, guys, we got a pirate problem. We don't got to hire people to deal with it. Let's get rid of the. Pay us to then go deal with it. That's kind of creepy. I gotta be honest. People who would pay money to go ride around in boats to shoot at.

[Ian Crossland]

People, I suppose the Russians, man, that's a hard people over there. What are you gonna say?

[Tim Pool]

It's better than them murdering people or whatever.

[Ian Crossland]

It's an interesting philosophy that people that want to be vigilantes bad enough would pay money to a government to go hunt their enemies.

[Tim Pool]

That's creepy.

[Phil Labonte]

I. I mean, that's not in a government.

[Tim Pool]

Let's jump to the story, my friends. Ladies and gentlemen, we have breaking news. We got him. We got him. The morbidly obese man and the four wheeler who rammed the cyber truck. We got him. It's finally over. Man on homemade four wheeler caught purposefully ramming parked Teslas. Yeah. More than one. Here's the video.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

That's a woman.

[Tim Pool]

No, that's a guy. That's a guy. That is a man.

[Ian Crossland]

He's definitely got a lot of estrogen flowing through his system.

[Tim Pool]

Look at this.

[Ian Crossland]

It's just an opinion.

[Phil Labonte]

All that.

[Tim Pool]

I just don't get it, man.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

He's giving himself a concussion while he's doing it, too.

[Tim Pool]

So his name was demarca. You. Cox. And he's been accused of purposely ram. Ramming and damaging several Teslas across The City on March 25. Apparently he didn't realize they have security cameras when none of these people do. Dude, this is really weird. People are stupid. Is it? Has. Have people always been this stupid?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Honestly, this is. I really mean this when I say this is mental illness. The stuff that you're seeing. These people are mentally ill, like eroded.

[Ian Crossland]

Brains from dietary and stress and stuff.

[Tim Pool]

Have people always been this dumb?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

No. I think we've got a serious mental health crisis related to drugs and food, bad food and all kinds of stuff the last decade or two.

[Tim Pool]

You know, I. This is like 20 years ago. I was hanging out in Chicago and I was. I was having this, like, philosophical debate with a friend, and I was talking about. We were talking about, like, NPCs. This is kind of crazy that it became a meme later on, but, like, solipsism and things like this. And I said. I was like, dude, there are some people who are just not real. I. I swear. Because either they're just too dumb. And then so I asked random people on the street, as we were. We were talking, are you sentient? Not a single person said yes.

[Ian Crossland]

Did they say no?

[Tim Pool]

They said no. They all said no. All them just outright no. And I was like, are you. Are you joking? Like, come on. I was expecting for them to be like, yeah, and we were at a college, so it's not like people are gonna say people don't know what you mean. I was like, we were outside of DePaul University. I just genuinely think these people. There's no lights on upstairs.

[Ian Crossland]

I guess they call it intelligence for a reason, because it's actually something. Like it isn't everywhere. Like, it's a unique phenomenon when someone actually has it.

[Tim Pool]

Do you think that if we asked these people, do you have an inner monologue? They'd all say no or Would they say, what's that?

[Phil Labonte]

They would say, what? What's that?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, like, you don't know what you don't know. Yeah, that's like.

[Tim Pool]

Well, if you don't have one, I'm not sure that telling you would actually help you understand it.

[Ian Crossland]

Some people think in, like, images. Some people think in sounds. Some people think in words. Some people just don't really think.

[Phil Labonte]

I guess I can't imagine thinking.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Some do what the voices tell them to do.

[Phil Labonte]

Right. I mean, I can visualize. Visualize things, but I like. I mean, I. I'm constantly, like, kind of walking around muttering to myself or, like, thinking out loud, talking to myself, so I can't. And so anytime I think ever, it's in words. I can't imagine thinking only in concepts or have not having the ability to think in words.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

And I think in pictures. I think.

[Phil Labonte]

Do you?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I think so.

[Ian Crossland]

Like, you picture something happening.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Someone's explaining something to me. I'm putting together a little movie in my head, and if there's a gap, I stop them and have to make them fill that in so I can continue the movie and understand it.

[Ian Crossland]

That's kind of. That's kind of how it is with me. And then there's, like, color, which is, like, warm. Like, there's a temperature of color around the imagery happening. Like, the jacket will be, like, a brighter red that's warmer, indicating, like, a. A feeling, like an emotion. That's kind of how I visualize.

[Phil Labonte]

Do you feel like that's an asset? My sense is that would be an asset when you're doing.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I thought that's how everybody sees it, because you don't really analyze it yourself until I have heard other people, and clearly my husband doesn't think that way. So when you talk to other people and you realize they're not following the same train of thought as you, you realize there's.

[Phil Labonte]

Does it help you when you're interviewing people?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Probably because I make people explain things very clearly, and I think that helps.

[Tim Pool]

I think that there's also something called. What is it? What is it? What's the word for when people can't visualize things?

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, I don't know.

[Tim Pool]

It starts with an A. Aphantasia. Oh, yeah. So I actually think that there's different modes of thinking, and there's probably a bunch of different ones. Some people might think in sounds. They actually. They almost hear the sound. You don't literally hear the sound, but you can. I don't know what's. What's the sound version of visualize Audio Lies. I don't know.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, I mean, yeah, I mean, you can. You can.

[Tim Pool]

Some people in their minds hear it. Yeah, Some people can think almost in text. So there's. There's different ways of thinking. There's like audio, video, conceptual. And then I think what you end up with is a lot of people who have the most rudimentary. They can't visualize anything. And there's no inner monologue. There's probably not a lot going on there.

[Ian Crossland]

And that inner monologue is important because that's what will keep you from doing that stupid shit. Like, you need to be able to see yourself in the future potentially doing something and questioning it and be like, hold on, there's consequences. Think about all the possible outcomes of that action.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Edit your actions.

[Tim Pool]

It's. It's not. It's. It's. That's it. But there's another component in that. People who have the ability to not just visualize an image of things, but to imagine what it could be. So there's. There's remembering something, then there's visualizing anything, which allows you to make predictions of the future consequence. Right, so you are right about this guy can't think ahead. But it's not just that. It's that he doesn't, because he can't. He has no reason for what he's doing. That's why people like us don't go around ramming Teslas.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, that's interesting. The age of reason. Yeah, that's a big deal. Reason wasn't always part of our norm. Like we kind of are in the age of reason for the most part right now. And there's a big diffusion.

[Tim Pool]

The reason I do. So there's a couple different. There's many different motivations for action. This is pure impulse. Someone told them to be angry, they got angry, they took an action. There's no rhyme or reason. It's just impulse. It's the lowest order of thinking.

[Ian Crossland]

That lizard brain, the amygdala.

[Tim Pool]

That's right. Then there's reason. There's reasoning, meaning. I think about the action. I visualize what will happen if that action is taken out. And then I decide how to address that circumstance. Sane, rational people do things like start companies and build houses and design trains. Everybody else rams Teslas.

[Ian Crossland]

And they also question their purpose. With reason, you're able to think, why do I want.

[Tim Pool]

Why am I drawing Sam Cedar? He can't.

[Ian Crossland]

He doesn't question his purpose.

[Tim Pool]

He can't even Google the word.

[Phil Labonte]

He doesn't believe Sam in free will.

[Tim Pool]

I said to drag the guy.

[Ian Crossland]

Free will. That's a whole other conversation. Free will versus fate. I wonder.

[Phil Labonte]

No, no, he doesn't believe that people have free will. He thinks that. He thinks that people don't actually have free will.

[Ian Crossland]

They're all starting, like, an automated system. He thinks external.

[Phil Labonte]

He thinks that you're re. That everyone. It's kind of pre. Predestined, depending on your. Your. I guess, your inclination and whether or not you've had enough food today and stuff.

[Tim Pool]

I don't care what he thinks because he's not smart enough to Google search basic philosophical. Philosophical concepts. He. He lacks not just the capability to understand, but the desire to try.

[Ian Crossland]

Interesting.

[Tim Pool]

But I don't want to talk about that guy. I was just dragging him.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, okay.

[Tim Pool]

Okay. Let's talk about the guy who got arrested for ramming a Tesla and all the rest of them.

[Ian Crossland]

What happened? Did he get charged with.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, I think he's getting felonies.

[Ian Crossland]

I mean, that's right.

[Tim Pool]

What do they give him multiple felonies?

[Phil Labonte]

You need.

[Tim Pool]

No, I. I got to be honest. This video is ridiculously funny. I mean, it's dumb.

[Ian Crossland]

Is it playing now?

[Tim Pool]

It is playing. Okay.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, my God. Well, that's the momentum, yo.

[Tim Pool]

We're. We're in trouble as. As a species.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

And the homemade. The homemade four wheeler. That's pretty cool.

[Tim Pool]

It's homemade. Is that what they said?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Wow.

[Ian Crossland]

We always have been in trouble as a species.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah. Weird. Homemade four wheeler.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

A lawnmower and a bicycle or something there.

[Tim Pool]

Wow. It's this.

[Phil Labonte]

Gosh.

[Ian Crossland]

How do you even describe single.

[Tim Pool]

A single felony for criminal mischief and failure to identify. These people are so dumb, bro. Teslas have cameras. I. I just don't get it, man.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Who doesn't know that now? There's still. People are still keying the cars on camera every day.

[Ian Crossland]

I don't. I don't.

[Tim Pool]

I think I get. Christians get mad when I say this, but I'm like, is it just that not every person is ensouled? Like, when you have a soul, you're there and you're present in the moment, and if you're not, you're just, like, milling about, scratching cars.

[Ian Crossland]

There's an interface between the brain and the soul. I think, like, the neural activity in the brain is electromagnetic activity, and the soul's probably, like your magnetic field or has some connection to that. But then there's that interface between the area around you, the energy field, and then the actual matter, and then there can be collusion. There can Be like diffraction. There can be all sorts of interference. And that maybe is just genetic from birth. Like it just wasn't built to be able to connect to that external source or it's diet. It's the way you were beat when you were a kid and you don't want to ever feel that again. And so you're shut off your brain just like your neurons just shrivel up and they aren't awakened. I don't know, man. It's almost like there's multiple species of human hominid. And like.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, there. There have been.

[Ian Crossland]

There sure have been. And like, why not now? Only in retrospect, maybe we'll measure it and be like, actually, yeah, there were people, were. Some species just got it and some didn't.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, yeah, I mean that's what did happen.

[Ian Crossland]

Like imagine. Because the hot. I wonder if they even thought they were different at the time. Like the Neanderthals.

[Phil Labonte]

And there's evidence that Neanderthals and Homo sapiens actually did produce some offspring because people from Europe have Neanderthal DNA.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. And Denisovans were like these big tall people from North Asia. There were the, the little people from the like, were those Australia?

[Phil Labonte]

Those were those Homo sapiens or Homo.

[Ian Crossland]

It was called Homo florencis was the little one. And then Denisovan was a. Was a hominid also a big tall, big guys.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Doesn't 23andMe are one of those. They tell you if you have any Neanderthal in you?

[Phil Labonte]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, wow. Well, they're back up now.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Chinese owned or something.

[Tim Pool]

I don't know. But all that, all that. All those DNA samples are up for sale and.

[Phil Labonte]

Yep.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Dang it.

[Ian Crossland]

That's.

[Tim Pool]

They plug those DNA samples and all that medical data into AI and they are going to have a lot of power, bro. You plug all you. If. If they were to take every human's medical data, DNA and current like blood levels and put it into AI, they'd be able to cure any disease overnight.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

They don't want that.

[Tim Pool]

The. Well, they can. The control they do, they can give to themselves.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So the, the. The thing right now with all this AI stuff is we're sitting here making pictures of ourselves fighting dragons or whatever. Like I made the kung fu.

[Ian Crossland]

Should highlight that tonight too.

[Tim Pool]

The kung fu thing. I tweeted about it.

[Ian Crossland]

That's pretty funny.

[Tim Pool]

I'll pull it up now so I can explain to people basically what happened. Let me see if I can find it. Oh, there's the bike lock thing. So I Tweeted this. I told Chat GPT to make an image of me debating a liberal. I didn't really. I said, make. Make him doing kung fu and fighting a demon.

[Ian Crossland]

And you just put a picture of you. Your face or something.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. So when I do the shows, the screenshots we have, I have. We have the. Produce the. The. The obs program, and I look at the camera, and then I just hit the command for. For screenshot. So I look at the camera, hit it, grab it, paste it into ChatGPT. And it was just my head. There was nothing else. Just that. And it made that. It made that picture. And that's. That's. That's crazy.

[Ian Crossland]

So go on to that. You're talking about the medical. Now, if they have this.

[Tim Pool]

So if they. Once they get access to everybody's medical information, the AI will see things you cannot. Yeah, it's gonna. It's gonna be able to correlate weird things where it's like everybody with lupus has low magnesium. You know, that's like, pretty overt. We would. We would notice that. We'd be like, hey, we've gone through all of these different charts of people with lupus. We keep finding low magnesium. That's a really obvious thing to find. But what the AI would find is, hey, every time someone has lupus, they're minus 1% magnesium, plus 2% iron, minus 3% vitamin, you know, K, plus 4% vitamin D. And it's like that specific combination results in this form of lupus. And then it can create a pill to balance out all those problems. And it can also do behavioral stuff.

[Ian Crossland]

Like, people that are depressed tend to face north three hours a day. And we found that if you face south three hours a day, your depression letens by 27%. And like, control people's behavior and get. People fall into this.

[Tim Pool]

Has known for a decade when you're going to poop.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Not a joke. Not being funny. Facebook already had the data because they've got a billion users and the computers easily mapped out that every human takes specific actions which show a likelihood of about to go to the bathroom. So it's like within a certain time of eating, within a certain amount of movement. They got your GPS data. There's a story on it, like, eight years ago that Facebook was actually. They actually knew when a person would go to the bathroom. That's crazy.

[Ian Crossland]

It's what concerns me is if they. If it starts lying, I mean, you know, without being hyperbole. Yeah. Really? Because if they. If they tell you, hey, we have all your medical data. It's such a tried and. And, you know, trusted service. And then they just give you something that's a little.

[Tim Pool]

Here's another image. I. I took my screenshot and said to make it anime. You want to pull that up, Serge? I said. I said this is the latest chat GPT update. I mean, it's kind of nuts. It's getting the hands right. That's a. That's a crazy image.

[Ian Crossland]

That's the best AI iteration of you I've seen so far.

[Tim Pool]

It is. It is ridiculous how good things have gotten in. Insane. So I took a pictures of pictures of my buddies, and I uploaded a chat GPT and I said, make them into anime. And it. Even the background and everything was perfect. It's nuts. It's really crazy to see.

[Ian Crossland]

You think? I was thinking we should do, like, a promo for IRL where it's a bunch of us in that genre. Yeah. Anime. I don't know. It's like, do you use the. You have to use the tech. It's like nuclear weapons. Like, if they. If the Americans didn't. It's too dangerous. It's too evil. We can't.

[Tim Pool]

It's too.

[Ian Crossland]

Too, Too powerful. We can't use it. No, you got to use it, and you got to be the best at it.

[Tim Pool]

While we're here, let's get. Let's get freaky with it. I actually. I don't know if I want to go to this one other story first. No, maybe we shouldn't. We'll go to that one next. We'll start with this one. You guys saw that one. Let me see if I can find a better story. All right, this. This headline's not good. This. I'll pull it up anyway. Holy crap, guys. All right, here we go. From Hoboken, N.J. patch.com Police chief defecated in office. Put Viagran. Office coffee. New Jersey cops claim several police officers filed tort claims against a New Jersey police chief saying he defecated on the office floor, according to legal paperwork. What's wrong with bringing you the stories that matter most?

[Ian Crossland]

Is he the guy that spiked Viagra, the chief? Or did someone else spike him and then.

[Tim Pool]

No, this is a North Bergen pooped. This is like the New York Metro.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Hypodermic needle into an officer's penis.

[Tim Pool]

This is great.

[Phil Labonte]

Stuck.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Why wasn't that in the headline?

[Ian Crossland]

Spike.

[Tim Pool]

Is that Viagra?

[Phil Labonte]

Everything is about. This is bad.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

What?

[Tim Pool]

So this is. This is. This is like Hoboken, isn't it? No, no, no, this is not Hoboken, is it? It's. What area is that? It's. What is that? That's not Union City, is it? Gutenberg, Bergenwood. It's right next to Manhattan. It's literally across the river. This is basically New York City.

[Ian Crossland]

So that's a really influential position to be the police chief of a borough of New York City. How is this guy in this position? Did he just have a psychotic break?

[Tim Pool]

It's right by West New York. Where's Hoboken's further south. Yeah. Jersey City, man. I used to live right here. That's crazy. I lived in Union City.

[Ian Crossland]

Our, our, this quote. Our clients now genuinely fear for their on job safety. On the job they're clients. I don't know.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yes, after you've been jabbed in the wing Wang.

[Tim Pool]

What? Another cop spiked coffee with Viagra. Attorney Patrick Toscano of Fairfield has requested in a letter to Attorney General Matt Platkin dated March 26, that the state take over the police department in the Hudson county town saying the officers now fear for their safety.

[Phil Labonte]

I would.

[Tim Pool]

No, there's photos.

[Ian Crossland]

Well.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh no.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh snap.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

What is wrong with him?

[Tim Pool]

I don't. I don't know if I'm mad or I like the guy.

[Phil Labonte]

Did this person have like a psychotic break or something?

[Ian Crossland]

I gotta know.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Mental illness is real.

[Ian Crossland]

He must have spiked the Viagra so that he could get the specimen in order to inject the thing.

[Tim Pool]

In all seriousness, the point of this story I've been telling people, when all these Republicans come out saying back the blue, this is who you're backing? Because Democrats appoint these people. These are corrupt cities. The guy who crashed into the Tesla in that car, no different than these psychotic cops that are running these departments doing insane things. I'm not saying all cops are bad. I don't think so. I'm saying the people running these departments are appointed by Democrats who get elected by psychopaths.

[Ian Crossland]

He's an appointee. The chief is an appointee.

[Tim Pool]

I'm assuming he's an appointee. But in most big cities the people who are on the police department are appointed by the. By the Democratic mayor. So what do you think is going to happen?

[Ian Crossland]

Spike the Viagra? Well, probably others are. My audio here myself talking about Viagra. What's going to happen? This guy's going to get arrested. If he has, sure. He's been arrested. He's going to get charged. He's probably going to spend see some time. I mean if he hurt a bunch of cops, he's really Going to get in trouble. It sounds like he, like, terrorized police officers on the job, so. Yeah. I hope you see some real punishment.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

This is on silent. I don't know why it's.

[Tim Pool]

You gotta turn the vine down, I guess. I don't know. Yeah, Your phone's just yelling.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

That's weird.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. You want to give it up?

[Phil Labonte]

This is. It's troubling. It's a troubling story that.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

That opening paragraph, who supports him or who appointed him? That's the question.

[Phil Labonte]

I don't know.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I mean, this didn't happen in one day.

[Tim Pool]

No.

[Ian Crossland]

No.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

List of things.

[Phil Labonte]

And he clearly should lose his job.

[Tim Pool]

How did he keep doing this stuff?

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, he kept doing it.

[Tim Pool]

You know, it's crazy. Remember that. Remember that cop who banged all his other cops? It was that lady cop.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

That story would not go away.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, that's.

[Tim Pool]

I kind of a feeling like this story is going to be in the news all the time because let's be honest, tariffs are boring. Sure, it's going to change your life, but it's boring. So when that, that lady cop was going on banging those other cops, every outlet was running at front page 24 7. And I was getting frustrated, like, dude, I don't care. But the people want what the people want. The market dictates. That's why I'm not a libertarian. They do.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. They like that girl because she was cute. And the idea of her having sex with a bunch of guys, a bunch of probably simps were like, oh, I love this.

[Tim Pool]

No, they were thinking, maybe she'll have sex with me.

[Ian Crossland]

Share the story. Maybe she'll see it.

[Tim Pool]

That's so creepy.

[Phil Labonte]

It's so creepy. That's.

[Tim Pool]

That's why stories like this take off, though.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, yeah. I mean, God, I don't. I mean, I don't know.

[Tim Pool]

How did this guy not. Not. Oh, whoa. What? He's been accused of being a homophobe before as well. Well, now you got big problems.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, that's. That's going to get the Democrats up and all in the area up. All up in arms.

[Ian Crossland]

We have to follow up on this if we don't get to the bottom today, because I got to know what happened to this guy.

[Tim Pool]

Well, they're scared of their jobs. They accuse. What is this? What is this? The claims also accuse Farley of sending a pride flag and masturbation cream to another officer's home, which his family saw exposing himself at work at random times and dropping drugs, drugs believed to be Viagra and Adderall, into Coffee Acclaim also says one officer's fish were believed to have been poisoned with drugs.

[Phil Labonte]

Good lord. I mean, he's. He's gotta lose his job.

[Tim Pool]

Poisoning someone's fish.

[Ian Crossland]

I mean, it's not. It's not attempted homicide, dude.

[Tim Pool]

I'm sorry.

[Ian Crossland]

Murder?

[Tim Pool]

No one's gonna write a movie about this. Like, it's like super Troopers, but the guys in super troopers are actually not bad dudes.

[Ian Crossland]

Because if it happened in a movie, I'd be like, that's just so unrealistic. If you walked in. If the guy walked into the chief's office and he's, like, bent over the table and you're like, come on, that would never happen. Apparently, reality is stranger than fiction.

[Phil Labonte]

Jeez. Like I said, he's got to lose his job. He's absolutely got to lose his job.

[Tim Pool]

But this is the state of liberal cities, right? This is just outside of New York City. I do not understand why people still want to live there.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, I don't.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Doesn't we need to search who appointed. And his name and his name is.

[Tim Pool]

But outside of this guy. What's his name?

[Ian Crossland]

I think it's Robert Farley. Is this the guy? North Bergen police Chief. Yeah, Robert Farley.

[Tim Pool]

But outside of this guy, this is New York, right? This. This is the New York metro. This is where people want to live. This is where tons of people choose to be. I do not understand. I mean, look, I remember I went to New York for the first time. It was crazy to see all these buildings. And I'm from Chicago, and I was there for, like, five years. And then eventually I moved out of the city and moved to Union City, which is just on this other side of Lincoln Tunnel. And I was there for a little while, and I slowly just moved farther and farther away the more I realized how awful it was. The prices are too high. The laws are insane. The police departments are appointed by psychopathic Democrats. People are planting bombs.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, apparently because the chief Bergen, or the chief was appointed by mayor Nick Saccko on February 1, 2024, to answer that question.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

He's only been there. He's done all that in a year.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. And as for why I live in New York, for me, it was the 90s, and I was like. It was. I was from a small town, so there's the excitement of a big city. And of course, New York has all that publicity.

[Phil Labonte]

It was also much safer in the 90s.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, it was big time.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Because here in the 90s, too. And that's when it went downhill before. Right before Giuliani came in.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, that was early 90s, right?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yes.

[Phil Labonte]

Okay.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

And it was, it was better, apparently, when I moved away by the time Giuliani was there. But the taxi drivers, when I would go back for work, would say, everything's better, everything is different with Giuliani.

[Ian Crossland]

I got there in 2001. I got there September, right before 9, 11. And I ended up working at ground zero. It was a crazy time, but it was exciting. That was why I wanted to live there. And then it was because before the Internet, if you wanted to be rich or famous or successful, you couldn't be in a small town. There was. You had to go to a big city. And so I think people are still brainwashed to think that they need to go to one of these hubs to make it. And you don't.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, I mean, you don't have to, but there is something to be said for. If you're trying the. There is something to be said for the networking aspect if you're around people. And this is something that, that Tim has talked about too. If you're around people and you're spending time with them at work. And so. And it's why remote working is bad or is not as productive as going to a job. Like if you're working on a team with, on a. If you're working on a project with a team, it's. You'll go to lunch together, you'll. You'll inevitably talk about the project and it'll. You'll actually get more done because you're in the presence of other people. And when it comes to, you know, from my, my experience from being in a band. If you're going to shows, right? If you're going to shows during the week, you go two, three shows a week, you're hanging around with people that are in the music industry. You're making connections. Bands that come through, you'll. You'll meet that. Those bands. You'll end up getting more tour opportunities. You'll know people in the music industry, as in, like in press, in the, in the media. You'll know people that are working at labels. A ton of people are like, well, I'm going to move to California, in la, because there is so much going on in the music industry. And the same thing can be said for New York City. And I assume that's the same in many industries. The reason people that are in the tech industry want to live in, you know, in Silicon Valley, they'll be around other people in the tech industry. They'll be around other people that have similar ideas, similar experiences, similar, similar jobs. There is something to be said for having the access to an infrastructure of people or networking of people.

[Ian Crossland]

Cheryl, did you like move there and then develop a networking and like establish your career and then leave and go somewhere smaller? What was your flow?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I went from local news to CNN back when it was a News organization in 1990 and 93. Then all the networks offered me jobs in New York. Kind of had to go there if I wanted to try the next thing. Did not like New York. Lived there, didn't live there very long working for CBS News. They gave me a choice to stay there or move overseas to report or move to Washington D.C. and report. Which is. I took the latter. Washington D.C. but living in New York, I think it's cute at first because you're living the New York life and everybody's rude and mean. It's funny because I'm from the south, so my husband used to say it's like a circus. Every day you get up and you go out and see the carnival. Then to me it gets tiring. After you live that way for a while, it ceases to become cute. And it's just tiring.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh God. Literally.

[Tim Pool]

Because the break dust smells like sour milk.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. That brake dust comes off the brakes in cars. It's so small fine particulates that it gets through the avola and the lungs right into your bloodstream. Talk about exhaust. Like you're literally exhaust. Physically, it will exhaust your body.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

You can, you can wipe your apartment down. If you live in Manhattan and you try to open the windows and wipe it down twice a day, you'll never get rid of the dirt.

[Ian Crossland]

It's like black stuff on the windowsill.

[Tim Pool]

Let's jump to this next story. Ladies and gentlemen. We covered this last week. Experts now even more confident a vast city exists under Giza Pyramids in Egypt after new discovery Scientists on a mission to prove a vast city sits more than 4, 000ft below Egypt's keys of pyramids have released a new analysis they say proves the findings to be true. Take a look at this. This is what they're. They're claiming. Let's zoom out. They're claiming that under the pyramids. Look at this. The Great Pyramid of Giza. How do you pronounce that? Khafra Kafra and Mankare Menkari.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Underneath it they say there's giant vertical shafts. Eight vertically aligned cylindrical structures arranged in two parallel rows from north to south. Descends to a depth of more than 2100ft. And look at this. This is what they're claiming. So now you've got people like Ian claiming that they're, that they're giant batteries or something.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, I'll tell you the truth. I made a video yesterday about this and I've been doing research on it all week. There's no corroborating evidence that I can find. This is just some Italian scientists said.

[Tim Pool]

They say a confidence level above 85%.

[Ian Crossland]

That's awesome because I want it to be true. It's just I need to see the scientific paper before I start to throw weight behind it. But if it was real and they had wells underneath the pyramids that were that deep down to the aquifers underneath, they might have been tapping into what's called the telluric current. It's T E L L U R.

[Tim Pool]

I C. That sounds like something you made up.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, but in fact, I didn't. It's called a telluric current, it means Earth current. And it's this, this low voltage current that travels around the planet and follows water, electrical current.

[Tim Pool]

Make it up. In fact.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Here's the current that flows underground or through the sea, resulting in the natural. From natural and human induced causes. Extremely low frequency.

[Ian Crossland]

And it'll actually go out of the earth out into the sun. And it goes into the sun and then comes back to the Earth through the poles and there's this flow. And so Tesla, Nikola Tesla, was obsessed with tapping into the Earth's telluric current to produce power. So if these guys had water down there, they're tapping into this electrolyte of salt water. And then they had a conductor in these wells. It could have been sending a charge up to the top, which is where they've got these granite buildings, these what they call the King's chamber in the Great Pyramid. It's one of them. It's granite. Everything else is limestone. In the pyramid, it's made of granite, essentially everything else. And why? Granite's a crystal. It vibrates, it's very dense, it's very strong. So they have these identical five granite structures that look like powered nodes, like power station nodes. And it's possible that they were vibrating and creating an electrical charge that was like a Tesla coil. If you hold an incandescent light up near an active Tesla coil, it lights up. So that these pyramids might have been lighting up the vicinity.

[Tim Pool]

And they were lighting up.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, maybe. I mean, there's no fire in the pyramids.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

The oil companies have had the technology for a long time to See, pretty deep, with precision into the ocean floor and into the ground. This seems like it'd be pretty easy to figure out.

[Tim Pool]

Just I think that's what they did.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Okay.

[Tim Pool]

They're using penetrating technology.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

We could get a second party to come in and do ask BP to go in there and take a look or something.

[Ian Crossland]

The problem they'd had before is they were using photons, I believe, to measure. And if you have lots of different objects, you can't penetrate all the objects properly. They diffract and they bounce and they stop each other. But now what this guy claims to have done, these scientists, is that they are converting photonic data into phonons, which are sound, lower frequency. And they're able to measure seismic data, seismic activity. And so they can see around everything that's inside. And they said literally these were transparent. With, with their technology, the pyramids become transparent. And they can. But I'm, I'm waiting on the, the scientific.

[Tim Pool]

I'm just wondering how nobody found these before. Just by digging. I mean, like people have gone in the pyramids.

[Ian Crossland]

We're so early.

[Tim Pool]

Didn't Mr. Beast go in the pyramids?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, he went under the pyramids. Jimmy Corsetti posted about that. He said this is it. It basically debunks this claim. Mr. Beast was under Jimmy. I don't know what Jimmy's Last name is. Mr. Beast.

[Tim Pool]

Beast.

[Ian Crossland]

But I'm talking about Jimmy.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, Jimmy Beast.

[Ian Crossland]

Jimmy Beast was down there in the waterways under the pyramids. Apparently. I guess. I don't know. I don't know if he was. I got to ask him.

[Phil Labonte]

Just the idea that.

[Tim Pool]

Yo, what. Look at this.

[Phil Labonte]

You know, if, if they did have electricity, if they had access to some kind of electricity like that, I mean that really would end up changing everything we know about, about history.

[Tim Pool]

What if they. What if they're gigantic? Like copper cylinders with wire winding all around them and then.

[Ian Crossland]

Or they could have.

[Tim Pool]

Because they said terrifying.

[Ian Crossland]

They said those were spiral staircases. So they might have went down to those cubes.

[Tim Pool]

The cubes.

[Ian Crossland]

Apparently I think they're hollow. And the water was flowing through the cubes.

[Tim Pool]

Right. There's a. Stairs.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, that's what they said is if.

[Tim Pool]

There'S spirals in 100 foot tall spiral staircases.

[Ian Crossland]

That's what they said.

[Tim Pool]

That's a long stair.

[Ian Crossland]

No, because I thought they were coils at first. I was like, what you said that it was. They were made of like a conductor and those were the coils. But maybe they dipped the conductor into the. Well, it's One of the two, if that were the direction they were heading. But then in ancient Egypt, they talked about the underworld under the pyramids, where souls would go. I think it's Aminath or something in the book of Gosh. It's the book of the Dead. Yeah, they talk about it and people would go under the pyramids and their souls would get washed away into this flow, perhaps the telluric current. And from the flow would come the souls. And they would teach people, like, when you're about to die, these are the things you say to the spirits. This is how you navigate that realm.

[Tim Pool]

Because you're saying that electricity doesn't exist. It's actually souls of all the dead people in the ground and their energy is being harnessed.

[Ian Crossland]

Maybe it's the same thing.

[Phil Labonte]

My car runs on ghosts. Maybe shoving ghosts into my car. But what's weird is get around.

[Ian Crossland]

I had originally said it's an ancient culture before Egypt, before the Egyptians. 10,000, 15,000 years ago. They had this technology, Atlantis, and it was washed away. And then the, then the Egyptians came and they built on top of it and they didn't know what the hell was going on. But these underground, the pyramids is limestone and everyone's like, where did they get the limestone for the pyramids? Well, they dug it from underneath, apparently. If this is true. So it would have been the Egyptians that built on top would have mind it then. But if the Egyptians built the mine, then it wouldn't have been the ancient culture that built the mine.

[Tim Pool]

It'd be cool if they like dig into there and there's this massively advanced city, but like abandoned. Just been there for 4,000 years.

[Phil Labonte]

Hope it's abandoned.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Hope there is no.

[Tim Pool]

There's dinosaurs down there and they're trying to press the buttons, but their arms aren't long enough and they're like, sucks.

[Ian Crossland]

What if there's like ancient batteries? Because it's called the Baghdad Battery. This is where really got the idea. And it's a copper or it's like a clay pot and they'll fill it with an electrolyte, like vinegar, orange juice or something or, or wine or something like that. And then they'll do the iron rod with the copper wiring or. Copper rod. It's an iron rod with copper wiring and they get electrical charge and then they can link the. So I was, it's best of my submission, man. I, I, I hope it's real.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, this is pretty crazy. It's true though.

[Phil Labonte]

It is, you know, apparently it is real. It's just A matter of, you know, can we actually figure out what it is?

[Ian Crossland]

Because if those scientists lied, their reputations are destroyed forever and no one will ever take them seriously for the rest of eternity. So why would they lie about this?

[Tim Pool]

Why don't they scan.

[Ian Crossland]

They did in 2022. They scanned under the great. They scanned the Great Pyramid with the same technology. And they. That they have an interesting.

[Tim Pool]

But what about the other pyramids in like Central America?

[Ian Crossland]

I don't know yet.

[Phil Labonte]

Look, there are people that make mistakes. There are people out there that will swear up and down the earth is flat.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

So listen, there was, there was a story a couple years ago that cracked me up and reminds me about when people talk about science as if it's something you can say is exact. They we reported on CBS when I was working there that they had found what appeared to be the oldest man that was still intact. And they gave some date of, you know, billions, millions of years old. He was naked, wearing no clothes. Found him at the top of the mountain. Some foreign countries. So we did a little reader on that on the news the next day. There was a little correction on Associated Press that said the daughter of the man recognized that as her father who had disappeared a couple years ago climbing up the mountain. I'm like, okay. The scientists said this was the oldest guy that they'd ever seen preserved in ice. And it was really just this woman's father.

[Tim Pool]

Well, I remember back in the day, every, every other day, coffee either caused or cured cancer. News would be like, coffee will help prevent cancer. The next day, coffee may actually cause cancer. And it's like cholesterol too.

[Ian Crossland]

Cholesterol good, cholesterol bad.

[Tim Pool]

Remember, you know, fat was bad. Everybody had low fat, everything.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yes.

[Tim Pool]

Now sugar's bad.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, they did that sugar, sugar free.

[Tim Pool]

Craze where they just what, you know, they claim that, that the sugar industry ran a propaganda campaign against fat, blaming fat for weight.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I think there's good evidence about Katie.

[Ian Crossland]

Couric's documentary Fed Up.

[Tim Pool]

Wouldn't it be funny if in 20 years they're like, actually fat was bad the whole time. And the fat industry ran a campaign against the sugar industry accusing them of a.

[Phil Labonte]

It's so frustrating, but it's hard to believe. Shocked.

[Tim Pool]

To be fair though, you like, you need fat to regulate hormones. And so when people were cutting all that fat out of their diets and eating gelatin and other garbage like gum.

[Ian Crossland]

Especially saturated fats, those are good. The unsafe fair.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

You look at cows getting fat, not eating fat, but eating hay and grass they eat grass, corn. That's what makes them fat.

[Tim Pool]

Actually, I think cows eat bacteria. Isn't that what they do? They. Yeah, they chew on the cud. They do. The bacteria then starts growing on it. So they eat the grass. It goes in their stomach, they spit it up, chewing it again. The bacteria grows on it and their body digests the bacteria.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Is that the good stuff we want in our gut? You know how they say we have to have the good. All right, we should chew our cud.

[Ian Crossland]

Haven't you been, like, doing deep dives on health and.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Not that, but. Yeah, I've been doing deep dives on some of the stuff you guys are alluding to about the manipulation of the health information and why. Well, all these chronic health.

[Tim Pool]

Well, you saw the West Virginia banning artificial dyes.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yes, I reported on that. In fact, I think. I think a lot of bans are about to come because this has been on the precipice of it with the FDA taking action. Finally, on the eve of Donald Trump taking office, they finally have decided to take action on a couple of these things, like red dye number three. I think they're going to ban fluoride. You know, everybody says that's a conspiracy theory.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, you. You think the government's going to ban fluoride and water?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Why do you think that?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

There's been a court decision in California that I don't know why more people haven't reported it. But based on the scientific evidence that has established that fluoride at levels typically found in water, the judge agreed.

[Tim Pool]

When was this ruling?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

In the last six months, September. Ish. And the court ordered the EPA to make a determination as to what should be done to make it safe. And since there's no way to make it safe because you can't regulate how much fluoride a person gets because you don't know how much water an individual's drinking or getting in all of their products.

[Tim Pool]

Let's start from the top because I pulled this up. This is from CBS News. Federal court rules against EPA in lawsuit over fluoride and water. Is this the story that you're talking about?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

But you could look at Full Measure with Cheryl Atkison and see an even better story.

[Tim Pool]

Let's pull that up.

[Phil Labonte]

Excuse me.

[Tim Pool]

So what's the gist of this?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

The gist is the court agrees there's overwhelming scientific evidence as to the risks and dangers of fluoride and water. And the EPA is under an order now to come up with some kind of policy decision that there seems to be no way out. The EPA cannot certify that fluoride is safe in the water. So as a result, they're going to have to likely admit that it's not safe, which will then mean states can't. States, communities, cities and so on can't use it.

[Tim Pool]

So CBS says. A federal court in California ruled late Tuesday against the EPA ordering officials to take action over concerns of potential health risks from currently recommended levels of fluoride in American drinking water supply. The ruling by D.C. judge Edward Chen and appointee of Obama deals a blow to public health groups in the growing debate about whether the benefits of continuing to add fluoride of the water outweighs. Outweighs the risk. I am confused. Are they saying public health groups want fluoride in water?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yes, because they're bought out by the fluoride industry, which is a very well funded and orchestrated propaganda campaign that began when it was discovered that fluoride was a byproduct of industrial processes and was too dangerous to dispose of in the ground. I think we're talking 1920s, 1930s industries were going to have to figure out a way and it was going to be expensive to dispose of the dangerous fluoride. And instead they found a way to market it to communities as something that we should put. Not they're supposed to keep it out of the environment, but then they sold it to communities as a way to put it in your environment and in your food and in your water and make your teeth better. And the evidence was dubious. And there are questions over whether the studies actually even showed that was the case. But there's no doubt now. I think if you look at it, the overwhelming body of science, particularly the independent science that's not connected to industry, shows there's all kinds of health risks with putting this medication in water. When people are, you know, used to be a time when we weren't getting a lot of fluoride, but now it's in toothpaste, it's in your drinks that you get because that's fluoridated. Now it's in the water. And if you get too much of this medicine drug and think about children, little babies and so on, it can have all kinds of.

[Tim Pool]

It can affect your. We've got this from SF Chronicle. This California city is fluoride free. Dentists there worry about the trend spreading. I've always, I've always loved this because it's like I have Florida in my toothpaste. I don't need to eat it.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

You don't.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

You're supposed to eat it, whether you're not supposed to eat it and how bad it may be when you're drinking it, how much benefit that can be.

[Tim Pool]

To your story from Rose.

[Ian Crossland]

That's what I was thinking.

[Tim Pool]

EPA must address fluoridated water's risk to children's IQs. U. S. Judge rules. So I got. I got a story for you guys. I had a friend 20 years ago, his sister had a kid, and I walked through his kitchen and it had nursery water with added fluoride. And I said, why? Why are you giving fluoride water to the baby? And they said, it's nursery water. It's for babies. And I said, no, you don't give. Babies don't have teeth. And they're like, no, no, babies need fluoride. And I was like, no, they don't. They don't need fluoride. She didn't believe me. So I just googled fluoride babies, and everything that popped up was a warning. Do not give your baby fluoride. And I said, why are they giving fluoridated water to babies? This is, this is currently, right now, they sell this in stores. Extra fluoride water for babies. Babies don't have teeth.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Should not be legal.

[Ian Crossland]

Is it just pure profit or what did you find?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Well, it's. It's a propaganda campaign that's bolstered by the industry that then teaches dentists who some. Some of them may not know better because, like, med schools, that dental schools are conflicted by industry teachings and so on. And it's just become this thing. But again, if you look, there's quite a body of science that undercuts any notion that this is something where the benefits outweigh the risks. And finally, now that a court has agreed, an important federal court, the EPA has to make a decision. And this was said before Trump took office. But now with Trump in office, there's a chance they may do the logical, scientific thing.

[Ian Crossland]

It's important to know that fluoride, as far as I know, and this could be wrong, but what I've learned is it is good. Well, good maybe for the enamel, for tooth enamel. It mineralizes enamel.

[Tim Pool]

If you're an adult and you have teeth and you're brushing your teeth with it, you spit it out and don't swallow it.

[Ian Crossland]

But even then, it gets on your gums and goes into the bloodstream through the gum.

[Tim Pool]

Sure.

[Ian Crossland]

So that's toxin.

[Tim Pool]

A lot of things are. Okay. You. You put a lot of things on your skin that you don't Actually want.

[Ian Crossland]

Exactly. Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Well, you don't. You shouldn't put pegs on your skin, but there are chemicals you can put your skin you can't eat. Right. You're not going to eat deodorant, Correct?

[Ian Crossland]

Correct. You don't get much if you spit it out, you're not getting it all. You don't want to.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

How about this? They outlawed red dye number three in cosmetics a couple decades ago, but left it in the food under a technicality where they just didn't process the safe. That part of the FDA said, we don't have enough money to move on that to look at it.

[Tim Pool]

Well, you saw that RFK Jr wants to get rid of the grass exceptions. The generally recognized as safe.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Oh, yes.

[Tim Pool]

So we talked about propylene glycol, which is used as. I forgot the word is. But it's to make food seem moist. It's this jelly garbage. It's an antifreeze. They say it's fine to eat, so they put it in. If you go to a gas station to buy a bakery product, it's probably got propylene glycol in it. It simulates moistness because otherwise they dry out. Then there's trisodium phosphate. Some guy had a viral video where he said, this is in Cinnamon Toast Crunch. But if you look at the bag of trisodium phosphates as harmful if ingested. So how is it in our food also generally recognized as safe? RFK Jr says he's gonna get rid of this exception and that anybody who wants to put any kind of chemicals in food has to get them tested for the health effects on humans.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I mean, it makes sense. I don't understand. It's one of the most important things that we could be doing. It's what we're feeding our kids. I made. I'm older than you guys, but as a kid, we used to read cereal boxes in the morning because there was nothing else to do. We didn't have phones, and we would read the ingredients and we'd quiz each other. And I always saw BHA and BHT added for freshness. And as a joke, before I started covering these things, maybe a decade or two ago, I would say to my siblings, what if we find out BHA and BHT added for freshness is actually, like, causing cancer or bad for us? It is. These are preservatives that they now recognize have all kinds of issues that they've been shoving into cereal that we've been spooning to ourselves and our kids. Why is that allowed? You know the generally recognized safe.

[Ian Crossland]

That's what I wonder why. Because obviously it's profitable. So there they paying people off to not to look the other way. But it's like just in the US a lot of these and they're banned in Europe. So is this like European bankers that are like let's destroy America from the inside. We'll profit and we'll poison them. This is great.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

It just seems to be that the US has been easier for whatever reason. It probably happens in Europe as well. But we've been the kings at being able to be captured by industry. When I'm talking about our political parties and our agencies, do you think it's.

[Ian Crossland]

Really, I mean it's impossible to derive if it's what kind of malfeasance is going on. But you think it's mostly profit from your research?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yeah, I mean I think they control these special interests have figured out how to control our information landscape. That's where the realm in which I work and I've written a lot about this and as such have been able to control a lot about any kind of regulation and hearings and you know, rules that would take place in laws. So it's just sort of a free for all for them. And then the media, because we're captured, we're not doing the proper oversight. We used to kind of be the equalizer. We could step in if maybe members of Congress were corrupt and the federal agencies weren't doing their job there were we. But now we've stepped back too because starting in my view around the 2005, 2006 time period, we got captured worse than ever before. And now you don't see the media doing the fair dual sided stories.

[Phil Labonte]

Abolish the FDA too. I mean if they exist and all these things have happened that, that are, you know, negatively affecting, impacting people, then the FDA is not fit for purpose.

[Ian Crossland]

I'd be open to like retrofitting the fda like if it actually worked.

[Phil Labonte]

Not scared of it.

[Ian Crossland]

But some oversight might be nice because.

[Phil Labonte]

What if that's what insurance companies are for?

[Tim Pool]

I, I disagree. I think we need more regulation.

[Ian Crossland]

Like you got to protect the dumb asses. I don't know.

[Tim Pool]

It's not about the dumb masses. It's that, you know, the average person doesn't understand when they put yellow five on, on a food box. What is that? And the average person just thinks yellow dye is like not a big deal if they were forced to actually put the name of that product. And they should be. How about we play this game? Don't Ban the artificial dyes. Name them. So Yellow five, they would put tartrazine, parentheses, coal tar derivative. See if people want to eat that.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Okay. Do you guys know about the Yuca app? So it does kind of what you're saying, Why I love it. You can use this and scan anything at the grocery store, even cosmetics. I accidentally scan something or stuff you put on your face, and it not only tells you the health stuff, which I think a lot of apps do, like what's good or what's bad, it tells you these additives and chemicals and preservatives and what they cause. So instead of having that cute little name, you can click the button, it rates the food. Good, bad, you know, poor, whatever. But then it tells you why. And when I'm looking at food now, if it's got. If it says, oh, maybe it's got a little too much fat in it, I'm okay with that. I'm looking for the chemical stuff in there and the cancer causing stuff.

[Tim Pool]

I got bad news for Maha. I got bad news.

[Phil Labonte]

Philosopher Ruh Roh.

[Tim Pool]

We can tell people that we want to make food better. We can ban artificial dyes. We can do all those things. But there is a commercial on tv, several of actual. Several actually, where a man eats a slice of pizza and then goes, oh, and then it's like your favorite food's causing you pain. Take this pill. I'm not gonna name what drug it is. He then takes the pill and smiles and eats the pizza. Yeah. And I'm just sitting there thinking like, dude, if doing something is hurting you, you're supposed to stop doing it. But imagine there's a guy putting his hand on electric stove and going, oh, it burns. But I really want to.

[Ian Crossland]

So we take this painkiller, this novocaine in your hand.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. He's like, ah, now I can keep doing this thing. It's like, bro, you're hurting yourself. People will choose to eat things that kill them and take drugs to mask the pain.

[Phil Labonte]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

So I don't think that actually labeling the food's gonna save the average person. That being said, there's a mom out there who doesn't know when she buys cereal that she's giving her kids some pesticide or some other garbage. And if she did, she wouldn't buy it.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Right?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. Like hyperlinks, if you. We're not there yet, we're still using paper where you just. You can't touch a piece of paper and get a hyperlink. But soon, maybe with graphene. You know, if our. If Our labels are also have a electrical current going through them. They can store a little bit of charge and they have WI FI access. You can tap the label on the ingredient and it will take you to show you the issues and it'll be read if there's health concerns associated with the ingredients.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

But here's the thing. A lot of these products are already less adulterated in Europe, for example. And I think all Kennedy needs to do, and I think he has plans to do this, is require more disclosure and warnings. And some will just change the recipe. I mean, a lot of them will choose not to put the warning on there, but to adopt a recipe that they're already using in Europe because they don't allow it there.

[Tim Pool]

I think, you know, West Virginia is banning artificial dyes. At first I was thinking this could shift the national food supply, as big companies are going to say it's probably cheaper just to change our product than lose West Virginia entirely as a market. But then I remembered what these companies said about why they use these dyes in the first place. When they tried using the natural food dyes, which are actually, in some instances cheaper, they didn't sell as well. People wanted the brighter, vibrant colors. So they tried using blueberries and carrots. They switched back to artificial dyes. They're gonna say if we switch to these dull colors through, you know, this using fruit dyes, we're gonna lose a billion dollars.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Well, West Virginia is not the only one. I think there's a dozen states or more that are looking at the same. It's a trend because people are starting to recognize it. And maybe there's some hope in the idea that you're right. A lot of people are still gonna choose to do what they want to do, regardless of the disclosure. But I think a lot of people aren't. You talk about the moms that wouldn't be giving their kids that cereal. They're either going to have to change the formula cereal or at least offer some better choices. I think it'll be. There will be a big difference for a lot of people.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, I saw an episode of, I think it was Diary of a CEO and they were talking about that alcohol with Gen z is like 20% what it used to be like this. This generation is awake when it comes to health.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah, yeah. People aren't drinking sodas anymore. That's why they're doing all these soda commercials now where they're bragging about how they have low sugar options. But it's because the younger generations are not drinking sodas.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Do you know I drank a Coke every day at least once since I was a kid? Because that's my coffee in the morning. And I stopped, I think, three and a half weeks ago today.

[Tim Pool]

Wow.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

That's no Coke.

[Tim Pool]

Awesome.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I listened to a podcast about sugars and sucrose and fructose and I'm like, oh, dang. Something else I gotta cut out. But it's, it's so bad.

[Ian Crossland]

Just shocking the liver and turning into fat.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

And the insulin and your metabolism.

[Tim Pool]

And you'll also notice that millennials tend to say, how come people look so much older back then? Like, they show pictures of the Seinfeld cast and they're like, these people were in their early 30s, late, like late 20s, early 30s. And they looked like their 40s, late 40s. What was causing it? I think it's actually pretty easy. Three things. The first is the obvious. They drank a lot more back then, they smoked a lot more back then. But more importantly, they also went outside a lot more. And the sun damages your skin. So you combine those things. The reason why I think that the current, you know, millennials and Gen Z look a lot younger. Even Gen X looks a lot younger. Lot less time spent outdoors, a lot less sun damage on the skin.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

What is your theory about Donald Trump? So he's 78 years old. My husband's 78 years old. He's got a lot of health issues and problems. But I know a lot of 78 year old guys. I don't know any of them that move and act like Donald Trump, never drank like him. Okay. I'm wondering.

[Tim Pool]

He claims to have never had a.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Drink and you know it's true because if, if anyone had ever seen him sip anything, we'd know about it.

[Tim Pool]

Well, they've claimed it, but his story is that he's never had a drink. His brother was an alcoholic and it terrified him and so he was just, he stayed away from it. Some people have argued they've seen him holding drinks at parties and that's their proof. Bs. You'll see me holding a drink at a party. It's going to be a club soda with, with a splash of cranberry, and it's not alcoholic. So they may have seen Trump holding something. It could have been, it could have been apple juice for all they know.

[Ian Crossland]

He's got to.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Even as. So the other, the other day during the interview, which I mentioned, he was three hours late because he was talking to NATO and dealing with Russia. And he walks in having not had dinner yet because I Asked him late. And he strolls in like a guy who's 30 years old. I know he doesn't look like he's 30. I'm not saying that, but he moves like a boss. And I'm thinking, I don't know, 78 year old guys. And I do wonder if, is it true that you destroy all the brain cells when you, you know, you heard when you were a kid, I did. You destroy 10,000 brain cells every time you get drunk. Do you ever hear that?

[Tim Pool]

Something like that?

[Ian Crossland]

There's a phenomenon called neurogenesis where your body recreates neurons and grows new neurons. And Trump might, just because, you know, he's living his best self. He's like, truly in line with God, whether you like him or not. He's like being his ultimate version of who he can be. So he's aligned, he's not stressed. He doesn't seem stressed about secrets and all these. He's like, just doing so there. That keeps you young, you know, doing what you love. Also, and this is maybe too hot for tv, but a lot it comes down to prostate health and guys that, you know the word is ejaculate five times a week. There's science about, like, that can keep you extremely healthy.

[Tim Pool]

You're saying Donald Trump's getting it on.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. He might just be like, Melania, you are the hottest, like, and, you know, she's down and the reason she always.

[Tim Pool]

Looks so frumpy, because she's tired.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. I mean, can you imagine keeping up with that guy?

[Tim Pool]

All right, we're gonna go to super chats and rumble rants, my friends. Thank God. Smash that, like, button. Share the show with everyone you know because it's the right thing to do. Telling your friends about Tim Cast IRL can save their lives. I'm exaggerating, but it's a good thing to do because it helps us. It's possible. Yeah, maybe. Maybe they're sitting there, they're sad, they're overweight, and they just one day watch the show and they see Phil's guns and they're just like, I want to be as ripped as he is gonna fit.

[Phil Labonte]

Cast irl.

[Tim Pool]

We're gonna have that uncensored calling show coming up for you about a half an [e-mail] Timcast IRL. So join Rumble Premium promo code TIM. 10 bucks off, and we're gonna take your calls. So join the Tim Cast Discord server. Go to timcast.com, click join us. Get in our Discord server. Because if you're just sitting around Watching the news. I'm asking you to be an active participant in this culture war with us. You will join tens of thousands of individuals. There's a FIT chat room where it's a. It's a room dedicated to getting in shape. People are going to talk to you. They cheer you on. You're going to make friends. There's. There's rooms dedicated to starting new projects, writing music, doing all this cool stuff. And more importantly, you just hang out in the IRL chat where you can discuss these political ideas and contribute your thoughts to this moment. We need you. If everybody who voted for Trump in 2024 stayed politically active, we would have no problem winning 26 and 28. Let's grab some chats from you guys. Let's see what we got going on over here. Insert generic names as obligatory. We are in labor with Tim cast in the background. Oh, wow. Congratulations. Hopefully welcoming our baby girl into the world soon. Congratulations. I recommend it. Recommend it. As a new father myself, very inspiring. You know, it's funny is I can't speak for all parents, but I see these movies where the baby's crying and the parents are getting frustrated. Like, I don't understand why you're crying. I do not feel any annoyance or any anger or anything. When the baby cries, we. It's usually just, you know, she's hungry. And then when Allison's like, either getting a bottle ready because we're. We're trying not to do formula, but we do a little bit, and she's just screaming. I just got a smile on my face. You know, baby's crying, she's screaming like, the world's ending, but it's okay. In one minute, your bottle will be here, and then she stops.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Does Allison have. So as a mom, I had a involuntary reaction of just sweat and I need to help the baby. I didn't even mean to. My husband was very calm and collected, and I would just be like, I got to help the baby. Got to help the baby.

[Tim Pool]

I just need to say this, okay? Because as a new father again, there's a lot of dads out there and a lot of moms who already know everything well and way more than I do. I am shocked by the pro life arguments, missing some of the most important points. I've been watching pro life, pro choice debates my whole life, and it was only, I think, I don't know, within the past few years that I learned why formula was so important. When the formula shortage happened, I was like, we need formula for. I had never experienced it, and There are parents who are like, sometimes mom doesn't produce enough milk. And then baby goes hungry and is screaming and needs that food because baby can lose weight very quickly. And I was like, really? I never considered that. So I see these, these arguments, and there was one recently where the woman said, you know, a baby's. A baby's not alive. It's the mother's body. It's just a fetus. And the woman said, at what point is the baby alive? The woman then says, once it's able to survive on its own. And the woman said, well, babies can't. Can't take care of themselves, right? Someone's gonna take care of them. Wrong. Babies literally need mother's milk. Like, babies can't eat food. How about that? You tell the pro choice people, like, when the, when the baby's born and it's able to survive on its own. Oh, you, what, you mean it like six, seven months maybe, when it could start eating mashed fruits. For that whole period, the baby can literally only have breast milk. We only recently invented formula because babies can't digest real food. So that meant up until the mid-1900s, babies were literally eating nothing but. But mother's breast milk. So when they say things like, oh, once the baby's born and now it's. It's on its own, that's not true. The mother, the baby is still very much attached to that mother. So I think I, I was just surprised that that's not a principal argument that pro lifers make right away, off the bat. They say things like, the baby needs its mother, but they don't explain. No, literally, I was going to say.

[Ian Crossland]

It'S almost like there's still one organism. There's still a connected organism. Even though they're separated by space, they're still kind of. I mean, I'm still connected to my mother, you know.

[Tim Pool]

This is why I said, after the instructions from the doctor, I was immediately against surrogacy. The doctor explained that mothers produce breast milk specifically formulated for the baby. The baby's saliva triggers a reaction in the breast, and the breast produces a specific balance of fats, proteins, and sugars. And I went, what? Because the nurse, the doctor was explaining that sometimes you'll see different fat concentrations. And then when we asked about it, she was like, well, for instance, premature babies, there'll be a thick layer of fat in the breast milk after the mother pumps. And I'm like, why is that? Because the mother's body is reacting to the premature baby's saliva and producing a Specific formula. And I'm like, so then what is formula? We give babies a baseline generic. We hope it works. And I'm like, whoa, okay. So the baby could be lacking fats and sickly, and your formula is not doing enough for it. And if it was breastfeeding from the mother, it's getting the proper balance of nutrients.

[Ian Crossland]

You know, that's similar to if a husband and a wife were about to have a baby and they used a sperm donor. You might think like, is this still my child? Even though that wasn't my sperm, is it still my child if it's not my wife's breast milk? It's is. If it's some corporation's thing, is that still my offspring?

[Tim Pool]

And then I started reading about this. Milk siblings. Do you know what that is back in the day? Because it is true. Today we use formula because we're a very antisocial society. Wet nurses.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I was just going to see if you knew about wet nurses.

[Tim Pool]

Women were all. Were typically always nursing because they're having lots of babies. So if a mother was not producing enough or a new mother wasn't producing at all, it was just colostrum. They would actually give the baby to another mother to provide milk for someone else's baby, and they would be called milk siblings. So.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

And my mom said that when she would have to go do something, she had friends that had babies, they would just breastfeed each other's babies while the one was out.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, milk slippings. It was a normal thing for hundreds of thousands of years of humanity today. We invented formula, and now we're very antisocial. We don't talk to our neighbors. This concept doesn't exist. And formula does not give your baby everything you need. Let me tell you guys, to all the guys out there who've already been through there who are chuckling right now. I had to go to the store to buy formula, and I'm looking at the ingredients, and I was just like, absolutely not. Corn syrup and soy.

[Ian Crossland]

Would you make your own? Is that. Have you looked into making your own? Is that.

[Tim Pool]

So we got the best. This is why the European stuff is so popular. The stuff that we got is the best you can get. And we were trying to find not necessarily hypoallergenic stuff, but there's like, sensitive formulas. And then I look at it. It's like soybean oil, corn syrup. And our doctors were telling us, don't give that to your kid.

[Ian Crossland]

Whoa.

[Tim Pool]

And we're like, what do we do? That's crazy.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

You know, About Operation Stork Speed.

[Tim Pool]

Yes.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

So there is, I can't remember the name of it, but there is. There are things in baby formula that are forbidden in adult food, but baby formula has an exemption because the baby formula makers want to have it in there so badly and did some kind of lobbying. So something that's not safe for adults is now in allowed in baby formula and Insane. He's trying to fix all that.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. I just want to stress one more time, like the best pro life argument I heard, the best anti surrogacy argument I've heard is that mothers produce a specific formula for the babies and that. And that store bought formula does not give the baby what it needs. That's, that's very, very important. Not to mention if someone is having a surrogate baby and, and I don't mean this for women who are unable to have children so they get a surrogate and the woman can still lactate. I'm talking about when it's like two guys going to another country having the baby and then bringing it back to their country. But we'll formula feed the baby. That baby is not getting its nutrients. It's. It's. Babies can't eat food anyway. We should read more chats. What do we got over here with the rumble rants? All right. Concrete Hades says why is the government of Canada allowed to buy ads crying about tariffs in the U.S. i'll help end foreign influence as Governor Jesse for Ohio. I got no problem with them buying ads. Let them buy the ads and then we'll rag on them. I don't know, just tv. H. Charles Foster III says, ian, the Dems have been the party of blooded bureaucracy and of burdening constitutional rights over 150 years.

[Ian Crossland]

Is that true?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Ian Crossland]

I mean, yep. I guess that was the old Republican Party. No, no other way around. The old Democratic party became the Republicans.

[Tim Pool]

Nope. What the hell?

[Ian Crossland]

What am I thinking about propaganda? Abraham Lincoln.

[Tim Pool]

Abraham Lincoln was a Republican.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And he's. And the Republicans still very much have very similar ethos.

[Ian Crossland]

Didn't say the parties flipped at some point.

[Tim Pool]

Never happened.

[Ian Crossland]

Not literally, but.

[Tim Pool]

Nope. Never.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

That's a story that's told, that's disputed. You know, that's just not true.

[Ian Crossland]

Okay.

[Tim Pool]

Yep.

[Ian Crossland]

I like your comment. Thank you.

[Tim Pool]

The actual story I prefer is that Democrats in the civil rights era realized that their, their racist policy. Okay. The Democrats of the party of Jim Crow segregation. The Democrats were the pro parties, were for slavery. The Confederates were the Democrats. After the end of the Civil War, the Democrats were the ones that Maintained racism and all of these things into the 1950s. The Democrats were the ones that were supporting segregation. And the theory is, at some point they realized, wait a minute, we are going about this the wrong way. We can't be the party that's antagonistic. It's not working. We've continually been on the outside. We've got to flip this around. So the Democrats decided to adopt welfare policies and the destruction of the black family as a me and. And Planned Parenthood and abortion as a means of destroying the black community and keeping them down. That actually aligns much better with history. As far as, from what I've read, this idea that at some point, the Democrats just had an epiphany. Well, we've been for segregation for 150 years. Let's be against racism. All of a sudden, makes literally no sense. When you look at the results of what Democrat policy does to minority communities, you're kind of going, I think they don't like minorities.

[Ian Crossland]

I know that the black.

[Tim Pool]

They're just pretending.

[Ian Crossland]

The Black Panthers had, like, the government really went after weed in order to keep the Black Panthers and the hippies down because they were afraid of political revolution. So it might be that they don't want an underclass revolution. So they've kind of separated and controlled them with bureaucracy.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Plan Planned Parenthood.

[Tim Pool]

And did you know that most Planned Parenthoods are in minority neighborhoods?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

But Sanger, you know her. She. They disavowed the founder on the Planned Parenthood website now, because she talked about. You know, because it was.

[Phil Labonte]

It was eugenics.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Yeah, eugenics.

[Tim Pool]

Alex Gray says Alex Rosen is in jail. He's charged with disturbing the peace and trespassing for exposing a pedophile at a Steak and shake who employs and is protecting him. Peto not arrested. You know, I will say this, though. You got to be careful, because sooner or later, someone's going to get. They're going to manipulate this. They're. They're going to. They're going to catfish him, and they're going to set him up so that he gets arrested. He's going to. He's going to find some random guy. He's going to have messages that he's pretty sure are from this guy, but this guy is not the person who's on. It was a catfish, and they're gonna get him arrested.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, that's a good point. You got to be careful about that. It could very well be like, I'll be sitting in a booth at the restaurant, and then they go there, and there's Some guy sitting at a booth at a restaurant. It's like, not the guy, but they.

[Tim Pool]

Could set somebody up, too, so they could take pictures of you. And then here's me. And then they show up and you're sitting there like, bro, I know you're talking about. I didn't message anybody. And then you can get.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

People can get arrested being swatted. But with there.

[Tim Pool]

There have been stories if you watch these videos. Not Alex Rosen, because he's. He's more meticulous, but there was a video recently where some guys were attacking a guy, and it was the wrong guy. And then the cops came up, and then they were like, matt, we're sorry we got the wrong guy. And that's why vigilante justice is scary, scary stuff. But I like Alex Rosen, you know? All right, the quiet part. Pod says, tim, as far as strength goes, the U. S. Has already conquered the world. Think about it. We literally have bases everywhere, supplemented by our naval fleet, which is mobile. Nobody can stand against us. Indeed, that's correct.

[Ian Crossland]

I don't know. Not everywhere. Not literally everywhere, obviously. Do we have a base? Beijing? No.

[Tim Pool]

Well, the reality, though, is if Russia, if the brics nations rose up all at once, we lose. Well, maybe we don't lose, but the United States can't stand, can't stand alone. If, if, if, if we got a bricks versus NATO, it'll be interesting to see who wins. The US Is very powerful in that regard, but the US Is not stronger than all of its adversaries. So. All right, let's see. We got in the old super chat department. Robert Romano says, tariffs are medicine. Take your medicine. Well, okay, I like that. What do we have here? Zero noose, says Tim. I saw Canadian government paid for advertising on i75 that say tariffs are attacks on your groceries. Well, they're lying.

[Phil Labonte]

Whatever.

[Tim Pool]

Yep. Kelly Adams says, Tim, Congrats on your baby girl. I usually watch IRL the morning after, but tonight I'd like to join in the fun and announce the birth of my second son, Elijah. God bless. Congratulations. More go to the gym posts.

[Phil Labonte]

Fair enough. I've been moving, so we've been slacking.

[Ian Crossland]

Do you document your gym activity normally on Twitter?

[Phil Labonte]

Usually I'll just go and I'll. I'll post it. Like, if I go to the gym, I'll just put a little quick video, like, go to the gym. You know, just something to keep people motivated.

[Tim Pool]

Matthew Morell says, did anyone hear that we bombed Yemen again? Like, for the millionth time.

[Phil Labonte]

We've been bombing them for days.

[Ian Crossland]

Oh, man.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. The funny thing is, I think, I think the whole story is a hoax. I think Yemen. No, no, I think the signal story is intentional. There's not gonna be any resignations. There was no hard. So there's. Everyone's debating whether the information should have been classified or was classified. It wasn't classified because they deemed it not classified. They announced to Jeffrey Goldberg, a journalist, two hours before the strikes, the time in which F18s would launch. They did not describe specific weapons other than that they'll be delivered the vehicles. And they did not specify targets. So there was nothing absolutely critical. More importantly, governments looping journalists on this stuff all the time. If the Trump administration had come out and said, when asked, like, why did Jeffrey Goldberg get on this? If Tulsi Gabbard just chuckled and went, we were trying to loop a journalist in on our thought process for the strikes on Yemen and he was invited to our chat. We, we wanted to have an adversarial journalist access to the decision making process. We did not include confidential information. We wanted them to see our process. The confidential discussion of sources, targets and otherwise was held in a skiff. There'd be no story whatsoever.

[Ian Crossland]

Did they end up following through with the plans from the chat in?

[Tim Pool]

But, but to clarify, nothing was specified. Yeah, because it just said the target will be hit.

[Ian Crossland]

One thing you could do if you were like, we talked about this a little bit on the Green show, if you were about to plan a military operation, say we're going to invade from the east, you go and you get a journalist and you tell them we'll be invading from the West. And then they go out and they spill the beans and tell the world fake information that you intended the world because you don't want your enemy to know where you're coming. So you want the journalists to be confused.

[Tim Pool]

And actually they don't do that. The military often invites journalists to ride along with them on operations. That's why I'm like, this is not a story at all. The only story is that Jeffrey Goldberg's an adversarial journalist. So I think it's possible that they accidentally added him. But that seems so weird. Then you look at what was actually said in these messages and it's exactly the Trump, the message that Trump wanted to get out. We're reluctant to strike the Houthis. We don't want to. Our trade doesn't work there. Egypt and Europe must remunerate. We're the only ones who can do it. We have no choice. I'm like What? That's the greatest messaging on a missile strike I've ever heard from any, any, any administration in my life. When Obama was blowing up kids, they just said, well, they're military age males, so they're enemy combatants. And we were like, what? Or when. When Luke asked them about killing Anwar Al Awki and Abdul Rahman Alaki. And it was. Who was it? It was the Obama administration guy said he should have had a better father.

[Phil Labonte]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

Now the Houthis and the narrative is J.D. vance saying, we're making a mistake here, guys. We shouldn't do this. And people are praising the Trump administration.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Let me ask you this, because I didn't read all the messages, but I heard a whole bunch of them read. And all of them were saying they agree it doesn't have to be done now. But then they went ahead and did it.

[Tim Pool]

No, only a couple.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Okay.

[Tim Pool]

A couple people were saying we could wait a month. And then I think Hegseth was saying, we are the only ones who can do this. We need to move now. But the president has final say. The only thing questionable about. Questionable about it was that it said F18s will launch and it named the vehicles. It didn't name specific weapons or targets. So I don't buy it.

[Ian Crossland]

I do. Well, I don't know what it is exactly, but I think there was malfeasance. Someone screwed up and should be fired.

[Tim Pool]

How do you accidentally analyst into it? How do you accidentally do that?

[Ian Crossland]

Or maybe someone intentionally.

[Tim Pool]

Exactly.

[Ian Crossland]

No, someone intentionally sabotaged, which is like not just firing. That's no prosecution. If they.

[Phil Labonte]

No firing. No one gets fired. No one loses their job.

[Tim Pool]

Yet.

[Phil Labonte]

The. The. The Biden administration got 13 Marines killed, and there was no repercussions for anyone in any position.

[Tim Pool]

But that. I don't even know. I don't even care.

[Phil Labonte]

The Republican. The do not.

[Tim Pool]

I want to throw that talking point in the garbage. We don't need it. We don't need it. If this. Then that Biden did bad thing. Therefore, excuse us here. No, literally nothing happened. That Richard Engel was on the ground in Syria during military operations. He knows exactly where they're going, when they're going there a day in advance. He brought his iPhone with him to Syria. And I actually asked him this, this is NBC News foreign correspondent. Why would you bring your personal device into Syria? You know, the Assad regime probably scanned and copied all of that information and he was shocked. He didn't understand. So when they say two hours before a journalist had access to the information, I say, what else is new. They often loop in journalists all the time. If the argument is it was an accidental ad and it could have been some random person. That's. That's an argument. If you want to make an argument, they shouldn't be conducting these conversations on signal which delete the messages. That I completely agree with. These should be in the public record that we should be able to go back to when we subpoena at a certain point in time. Disappearing messages are bad for government. But the idea that a journalist got access to information, I'm like, I've, I've reported on stories where the government's giving me a heads up.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

I just want to know who in that group had the Trump hating editor of Atlantic on speed dial on a signal. In other words, because you can't loop them. I would be concerned if I were Trump that there are people. He's notorious for having people that were turncoats in the first term working against him while pretending to work for him. I'm sure there's still. There is still.

[Tim Pool]

I have got probably 50 adversarial journalists in my phone.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

You're not Donald Trump or a political figure that's been fighting that. Like that was. That was really the downfall of a lot of initiatives he tried to make the first term.

[Tim Pool]

If the argument is at this point we realize the pitfalls of being in communication with these guys. Maybe we should remove them from these work phones. Fine. But I am not surprised to hear that Mike Waltz had the editor in chief of the Atlantic in his phone. That Trump gives comments to these news organizations all the time. I think I cannot, I'm sorry, I'm hearing this from almost nobody. But I really do think Trump did it on purpose. Maybe. Maybe. I don't know. But you had this story about a judge and Donald Trump and blocking trend Aragua and the deportations. Leftists were fundraising off it like crazy. They're launching lawsuits. All of a sudden a not a nothing burger story pops up and it's the apocalypse for the left. People should be fired. Democrats argue this all the time and did during his first term. Trump intentionally makes scandals to distract from his actual operations. The Houthi strikes were were was last week and now only thing the media can do is talk about it. There's nothing in the messages. Literally nothing except for positive pro Trump messaging. The Atlantic now published all of Donald Trump, all the messaging from Trump's cabinet and these and the security personnel that make him look good. He's being praised by Trump supporters who were before attacking him for bombing The Houthis. When Donald Trump bombed Yemen, everybody started sharing the video of my interview with him where he said. I said, why are. Why are they bombing Yemen? And he said, we shouldn't be doing that. Now all of a sudden, everyone's saying, trump did a good job. Look at the messaging. JD Vance is a patriot. He's saying, we shouldn't be doing this. They're expecting remuneration. It's making Trump look good. You look at these messages. Who did get leaked to an adversary journalist they knew would publish it, knew would make it a big story? Why are they having these conversations? Why does it sound so canned? Why is there no shorthand in text messages? Come on. Everybody who texts and you're in a group text knows that there's a lot of shorthand. Now, granted, there were some emojis, but this read like it was scripted, like they were sitting there laughing, like you think Jeffrey Goldberg's buying it. And then a week after the strike, they made Trump the good guy on the Yemen strike story.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

But who's the audience? Because I would argue if you walked around on the streets, almost nobody you ask will know who the Houthis are or anything.

[Tim Pool]

And they say that in the messages. They say, literally, why are we going to strike them? It's a mistake. Most Americans don't even know who the Houthis are. Then what happens? The Atlantic publishes a story explaining exactly what Trump wanted explained. Maybe not Trump, but his team. It sounds to me like this was manufactured.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Vance is smart enough to do that.

[Tim Pool]

Look at it this way. Trump goes, we're going to strike the Houthis. J.D. vance says, Mr. President, with all due respect, this goes against your messaging. This is in private. We do this, your base will be mad at you. So, okay, what do we do? We can put out a statement. We can try and explain why we got to do it. Nobody will run that. Nobody's. If we make a statement, it's going to get picked up by the right wing press, and they're going to attack the president and say, don't do it. It's wrong. We have to do it, and we have to get the story out. Here's one idea, right? Let's make a phone, a group text, loop in a journalist so that he publishes our messaging the way we want it, and then we'll see how that story goes. They give them. They give them the information right before the strike happens, which Trump could have put out in a press release. Strikes have commenced. This guy waits a little while, publishes a story. It's national news for a week. Instead of talking about trend, instead of talking about the Mahmoud Khalil and all these other people where Democrats use the PR to fundraise, you end up with them talking about a nothing burger text message to a journalist where I will stress if the response from Tulsi Gabbard and Pete Hegseth was right at the gate. What do you mean we invited Jeffrey Goldberg to our chat? Well, he's saying you accidentally looped him in. What? No. No, we intentionally looped him in. I'm sorry, I don't quite understand. We. We let a journalist into our chat as we were. We were discussing our plans for Yemen. We routinely disclose information to journalists when it's not classified. Jeffrey Goldberg would look like a. Instead, they went whoopsie daisy, and now it's a national story for a week.

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Maybe what'll bolster that is if there is, and this is probably the case, because it doesn't look like anybody's going to be, you know, punished for it. If, if nobody's punished for it, if they don't say, we got to the bottom of who added it and here's who did it and here's who's fired, then that bolster.

[Tim Pool]

They already said it.

[Phil Labonte]

No one should.

[Tim Pool]

But they already said it. Trump already said no one will be fired. We're done. Story's over.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And I'm like, this is fake. And the left eats it up because they want the story of Trump to be a moron. If I was. Look, this is, this is PR101. This is like entry level public relations. Do you guys remember Tucker Max? Yep. Yeah, we had Tucker Max bought a billboard for his book, and then he was working with Ryan Holiday. And the story goes. I don't know if exactly all the credit goes to Ryan Holiday for this because I think someone. There was an argument over it. But Tucker Max had a book. I think it was Ryan Holiday. They defamed their own billboard. Then the next morning, they called a radio station and said, yo, someone graffitied up this billboard. They organized their own protests. That way the news would report protests had started. It's like Kevin Smith went outside during the filming of Dogma and gave interviews at the protests of his own film. This is really low tier, basic PR manipulation stuff. Hey, Lupin, who's a journalist we hate, get Goldberg. He'll do it. Write down exactly what the message needs to be. He'll publish it. No one's going to get fired. The Democrats are saying Hegseth should be fired. He's not even the one who started the group chat. That makes sense.

[Ian Crossland]

It'd be the guy if anybody got fired, be whoever added the journalist. And that's only if it was a.

[Tim Pool]

They're saying it might be, it might be. It might have been an intern. In which case there is the scapegoat. Trump's message is espoused by the Atlantic to everybody. They talk about it for a week. Everybody on the right sees J.D. vance saying we can't do this. We're reluctant. Pete Hexa saying we have no choice, then reminding the American people, don't worry, Egypt and Europe must remunerate on this. I'm like that. That is Donald Trump giving a speech at a rally. All of his talking points, the talking points before was Trump should not bomb Yemen. Now it's look at this deep, thoughtful communication. The statement from the spokesperson was hilarious. This appears to be a genuine communication of deep and thoughtful communications on this. A military strike or something like that. Anyway, that's just my thoughts. I don't know, maybe I'm crazy. That's just me, my friend. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone. You know we got that uncensored Call in show coming up in about a minute. You don't want to miss it. Go to rumble.com timcast IRL and use promo code TIM10 to get 10 bucks off an annual membership to watch our Green Room podcast, feature length documentaries and the uncensored Call in show. Now if you want to call into the show, you've got to join the Discord server. That's our community. That'[e-mail] they're separate. So the Rumble Premium is where you get to watch everybody from Steven Crowder, Russell Brand, Dave Rubin, et cetera, et cetera. But if you want to join our community, go to timcast.com click join us and we hope to see you there. Follow me on Accident Instagram at Timcast. Cheryl, do you want to shout anything out?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

Well, I'd love for people to look at my national bestseller five stars and Amazon Follow the Science. All the proceeds from from these things that I do go to independent reporting causes. I give ION awards for independent off narrative reporting to professionals and at two colleges because in my industry and I judge the Emmys every year, a lot of times what wins is not the original good kind of reporting that I think we need to be encouraging. So if you want to support that kind of stuff and look up my show full measure after hours.

[Ian Crossland]

What is it that Follow the Science about?

[Cheryl Atkisson]

It's about how sort of explaining behind the scenes with anecdotes and documentation and citations, how we have had this explosion of chronic health disorders for 20 years that we all recognize that our doctors pretend not to notice or don't notice. Either one's equally as bad, but for the opportunity that they have to try to treat it with expensive treatments. But there's a big story behind follow the science.

[Ian Crossland]

All right, well, check it out on Amazon or wherever, anywhere books are sold. I'm Ian Crossland and follow me on the Internet at Ian Crossland. I do videos from time to time, sometimes daily and I did one on the Pyramids yesterday. So check it out at ian Crossland on YouTube X All the all the social networks. Find me. Hit me up. See you later.

[Phil Labonte]

I am Phil that remains on Twix. I'm Filler remains official on Instagram. The band is all that remains. Our new record dropped on January 31st. It's entitled Anti Fragile. You can check it out on YouTube, Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, Spotify and Deezer. Don't forget, the left lane is for crime.

[Tim Pool]

We will see you all over at the uncensored calling show, rumble.com timcast IRL in about 30 seconds. Thanks for hanging out.